Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Commentary | Clinical Science and Epidemiology

Pig Movement and Antimicrobial Use Drive Transmission of Livestock-Associated Staphylococcus aureus CC398

Tara C. Smith, Meghan F. Davis, Christopher D. Heaney
Tara C. Smith
aKent State University College of Public Health, Kent, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meghan F. Davis
bDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
cDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher D. Heaney
bDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
dDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
eDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02459-18
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus has changed considerably over the last 3 decades, including the recognition of lineages associated with the community and with livestock exposure, in addition to nosocomial strains. A recent study by R. N. Sieber, R. L. Skov, J. Nielsen, J. Schulz, et al. (mBio 9:e02142-18, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02142-18) demonstrates the importance of multisectoral cooperation at the intersection of occupational health, genomics, veterinary medicine practitioners, and farmers in order for us to better understand the epidemiology of antibiotic-resistant organisms.

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.

COMMENTARY

The epidemiology of the opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus aureus has changed substantially over the last 3 decades. S. aureus was originally considered chiefly a hospital-associated organism, but new classes of strains that emerged outside of the hospital setting were identified in the 1990s (community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus [CA-MRSA]) and in the 2000s (livestock-associated MRSA [LA-MRSA]). The latter was first associated with a single multilocus sequence type, ST398, and other closely related strains within clonal complex 398 (CC398). While CC398 strains were first identified in Europe (1, 2), they now are known to have a global distribution (3).

The application of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has enabled better understanding of the potential origins of CC398 (4), and in the study discussed here, Sieber et al. (5) have applied this tool to better understand how animal movement within the Danish pig production system drives the spread of CC398. This work has important implications for control efforts to combat LA-MRSA within the Danish pig production system and may inform surveillance and intervention efforts globally.

Examining over 17,000 pig movements on 273 farms, Sieber and coauthors were able to determine that farms receiving animals from positive herds had a >4-fold-higher incidence rate than farms receiving animals from negative herds. They also noted that the dominant CC398 lineages (termed L1, L2, and L3 based on clustering within the phylogenetic tree) were those which contained multiple resistance genes, including those conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, lincosamides, and quinolones (antimicrobial drugs), as well as cadmium and zinc (metals). Finally, they demonstrated that the percentage of L1 to L3 cases in humans (skin and soft tissue infections [SSTI] and bloodstream infections [BSI]) also increased during the same temporal period, with L3 strains in particular demonstrating strong concordance with increases in pig prevalence and human SSTI (6).

This study’s integration of WGS and epidemiologic time-trend data from pigs and humans at a national level represents a significant knowledge advancement, beyond what has been achievable by typical studies in this field worldwide. Such studies typically employ less-granular molecular epidemiologic data (culture-based, PCR-based, or spa or multilocus sequence typing of S. aureus) collected from pigs or humans (not often from both), which can limit understanding of the relatedness and direction of transmission pathways. Although it is possible that the epidemic of LA-MRSA in humans in Denmark has been driven by factors besides pig movement and production activities, such as a common environmental reservoir for both people and animals or person-to-person transmission pathways, this study’s depth and breadth of epidemiologic and WGS data analysis from pig production networks and human carriage and infection isolates provide some of the strongest evidence to date of the relatedness of animal and human LA-MRSA carriage and infection isolates.

Of course, animal transportation has long been known to be a factor affecting the spread of disease, locally and internationally. The components of the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus appear to have been in place due to the international movement of swine (7). Early work suggested that importation of swine from Canada may have brought MRSA CC398 to the United States (8), though WGS methods were not employed to test this hypothesis. What is unique about this new work is the fine-grained detail provided about not only genomic sequences of bacteria isolated from the farms and the ability to track those from donor to recipient farms but also the possible ways that antimicrobial use on these farms may have influenced their survival and evolution. This includes uses of tetracycline and zinc supplementation of feed, which have previously been suggested to be drivers of MRSA evolution (9–11).

This work is one piece of a larger effort to identify how strains enter animal production (e.g., through pig breeding farms), disseminate through the production system, and ultimately expose humans through occupational or other animal contact, by residence in proximity to production facilities or fields impacted by animal manure, or via retail meat pathways. Sieber et al. comment that their WGS data suggest that early strains detected in the Danish production system were heterogeneous but that clonal expansion of a few strains led to the dominance of these lineages in the detected isolates in 2014 (5). Whether the early heterogeneity of strains reflects multiple introduction events onto breeding farms cannot be confirmed in the current work, but prior studies have suggested the potential for feed to play a role in the introduction of not just LA-MRSA strains (12) but also other animal pathogens (13). While the current work suggests that animal production systems—and animal movement within these systems—is a critical target for intervention, more work is needed to clarify the various upstream factors that likely contribute to introduction and reintroduction of LA-MRSA strains into the production chain.

Through identifying the importance of animal movement to the prevalence of LA-MRSA in the Danish pig production sector, this work highlights the critical importance of a One Health approach to understand and control anthropozoonotic pathogens. One Health approaches target not only human transmission pathways but also animal transmission networks, food production supply chains, and environmental reservoirs. Such efforts are inherently multidisciplinary and require careful harmonization of laboratory and data analysis methods (14). Given this, veterinary involvement and leadership will be needed in multiple sectors, from farm production through policy efforts, for intervention efforts to be successful and to prevent unintended consequences to animal health and well-being from implementation of these interventions. Equally, engagement of stakeholders in many related sectors, particularly those involving animal breeding and animal transportation and distribution, is essential to ensure that challenges that producers and distributors may face are addressed as part of any intervention effort.

As researchers endeavor to fill similar knowledge gaps in the United States, this study creates an exciting yet equally daunting prospect because it makes plain the resources and multisectoral cooperation that are needed to achieve knowledge advancements. What knowledge gains would be possible if similar or greater access and resources were available to answer these questions in pig and human populations in other leading global markets of pork production (e.g., North and South America and China)? This study serves as an excellent example of the important role of cross-sector cooperation whereby occupational health, public health, medical, veterinary, and agricultural researchers pursue studies with similar questions that are designed with an understanding of principles of molecular microbiology and epidemiology that must recognize how microbes know no borders, and that antimicrobial selective pressures and bacterial evolutionary patterns represent global public health challenges that will require our most advanced analytical and interdisciplinary cooperation to solve.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We were supported by the NIH NIAID (grants R21AI133492 to M.F.D., R01AI130066 to M.F.D. and C.D.H., and R43AI141265 and R21AI139784 to C.D.H.), the NIH (grant K01OD019918 to M.F.D.), the Northeast Center for Agricultural Health (grant to M.F.D.), the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics (grant to M.F.D. and C.D.H.), a Lipitz Public Health Policy Faculty award (to M.F.D.), the NIH NIEHS (grant R01ES026973 to C.D.H.), the AHRQ (grant R18 HS019966 to T.C.S.), and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (AFRI food safety grant 2011-67005-30337 to T.C.S.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Published 11 December 2018
  • For the article discussed, see https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02142-18.

  • Copyright © 2018 Smith et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Voss A,
    2. Loeffen F,
    3. Bakker J,
    4. Klaassen C,
    5. Wulf M
    . 2005. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerg Infect Dis 11:1965–1966. doi:10.3201/eid1112.050428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Armand-Lefevre L,
    2. Ruimy R,
    3. Andremont A
    . 2005. Clonal comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy pig farmers, human controls, and pigs. Emerg Infect Dis 11:711–714. doi:10.3201/eid1105.040866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Fluit AC
    . 2012. Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:735–744. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03846.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Price LB,
    2. Stegger M,
    3. Hasman H,
    4. Aziz M,
    5. Larsen J,
    6. Andersen PS,
    7. Pearson T,
    8. Waters AE,
    9. Foster JT,
    10. Schupp J,
    11. Gillece J,
    12. Driebe E,
    13. Liu CM,
    14. Springer B,
    15. Zdovc I,
    16. Battisti A,
    17. Franco A,
    18. Zmudzki J,
    19. Schwarz S,
    20. Butaye P,
    21. Jouy E,
    22. Pomba C,
    23. Porrero MC,
    24. Ruimy R,
    25. Smith TC,
    26. Robinson DA,
    27. Weese JS,
    28. Arriola CS,
    29. Yu F,
    30. Laurent F,
    31. Keim P,
    32. Skov R,
    33. Aarestrup FM
    . 2012. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. mBio 3:e00305-18. doi:10.1128/mBio.00305-18.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sieber RN,
    2. Skov RL,
    3. Nielsen J,
    4. Schulz J,
    5. Price LB,
    6. Aarestrup FM,
    7. Larsen AR,
    8. Stegger M,
    9. Larsen J
    . 2018. Drivers and dynamics of methicillin-resistant livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in pigs and humans in Denmark. mBio 9:e02142-18. doi:10.1128/mBio.02142-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Larsen J,
    2. Petersen A,
    3. Larsen AR,
    4. Sieber RN,
    5. Stegger M,
    6. Koch A,
    7. Aarestrup FM,
    8. Price LB,
    9. Skov RL,
    10. Danish MSG
    . 2017. Emergence of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections in Denmark. Clin Infect Dis 65:1072–1076. doi:10.1093/cid/cix504.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mena I,
    2. Nelson MI,
    3. Quezada-Monroy F,
    4. Dutta J,
    5. Cortes-Fernandez R,
    6. Lara-Puente JH,
    7. Castro-Peralta F,
    8. Cunha LF,
    9. Trovao NS,
    10. Lozano-Dubernard B,
    11. Rambaut A,
    12. van Bakel H,
    13. Garcia-Sastre A
    . 2016. Origins of the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic in swine in Mexico. Elife 5:e16777. doi:10.7554/eLife.16777.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Smith TC,
    2. Male MJ,
    3. Harper AL,
    4. Kroeger JS,
    5. Tinkler GP,
    6. Moritz ED,
    7. Capuano AW,
    8. Herwaldt LA,
    9. Diekema DJ
    . 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain ST398 is present in midwestern U.S. swine and swine workers. PLoS One 4:e4258. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004258.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Nair R,
    2. Thapaliya D,
    3. Su Y,
    4. Smith TC
    . 2014. Resistance to zinc and cadmium in Staphylococcus aureus of human and animal origin. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35(Suppl 3):S32–S39. doi:10.1086/677834.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Aarestrup FM,
    2. Cavaco L,
    3. Hasman H
    . 2010. Decreased susceptibility to zinc chloride is associated with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in Danish swine. Vet Microbiol 142:455–457. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.10.021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Cavaco LM,
    2. Hasman H,
    3. Aarestrup FM
    . 2011. Zinc resistance of Staphylococcus aureus of animal origin is strongly associated with methicillin resistance. Vet Microbiol 150:344–348. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ferguson DD,
    2. Smith TC,
    3. Hanson BM,
    4. Wardyn SE,
    5. Donham KJ
    . 2016. Detection of airborne methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus inside and downwind of a swine building, and in animal feed: potential occupational, animal health, and environmental implications. J Agromedicine 21:149–153. doi:10.1080/1059924X.2016.1142917.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Dee S,
    2. Clement T,
    3. Schelkopf A,
    4. Nerem J,
    5. Knudsen D,
    6. Christopher-Hennings J,
    7. Nelson E
    . 2014. An evaluation of contaminated complete feed as a vehicle for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection of naive pigs following consumption via natural feeding behavior: proof of concept. BMC Vet Res 10:176. doi:10.1186/PREACCEPT-5213019221299203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Davis MF,
    2. Rankin SC,
    3. Schurer JM,
    4. Cole S,
    5. Conti L,
    6. Rabinowitz P,
    7. Gray G,
    8. Kahn L,
    9. Machalaba C,
    10. Mazet J,
    11. Pappaioanou M,
    12. Sargeant J,
    13. Thompson A,
    14. Weese S,
    15. Zinnstag J
    , COHERE Expert Review Group. 2017. Checklist for One Health Epidemiological Reporting of Evidence (COHERE). One Health 4:14–21. doi:10.1016/j.onehlt.2017.07.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Pig Movement and Antimicrobial Use Drive Transmission of Livestock-Associated Staphylococcus aureus CC398
Tara C. Smith, Meghan F. Davis, Christopher D. Heaney
mBio Dec 2018, 9 (6) e02459-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02459-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pig Movement and Antimicrobial Use Drive Transmission of Livestock-Associated Staphylococcus aureus CC398
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Pig Movement and Antimicrobial Use Drive Transmission of Livestock-Associated Staphylococcus aureus CC398
Tara C. Smith, Meghan F. Davis, Christopher D. Heaney
mBio Dec 2018, 9 (6) e02459-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02459-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • COMMENTARY
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

agriculture
antibiotics
Staphylococcus aureus
swine
antibiotic resistance

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511