Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Molecular Biology and Physiology

Roles of Cholesteryl-α-Glucoside Transferase and Cholesteryl Glucosides in Maintenance of Helicobacter pylori Morphology, Cell Wall Integrity, and Resistance to Antibiotics

Majjid A. Qaria, Naveen Kumar, Arif Hussain, Shamsul Qumar, Sankara N. Doddam, Ludovico P. Sepe, Niyaz Ahmed
Indranil Biswas, Editor
Majjid A. Qaria
aPathogen Biology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naveen Kumar
aPathogen Biology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arif Hussain
aPathogen Biology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shamsul Qumar
aPathogen Biology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sankara N. Doddam
aPathogen Biology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ludovico P. Sepe
bDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max-Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niyaz Ahmed
aPathogen Biology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India
cInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Indranil Biswas
KUMC
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshio Yamaoka
Oita University Faculty of Medicine
Roles: Solicited external reviewer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mun Fai Loke
University of Malaya
Roles: Solicited external reviewer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Motiur Rahman
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit
Roles: Solicited external reviewer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mrutyunjay Suar
KIIT School of Biotechnology
Roles: Solicited external reviewer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01523-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Deletion of the hp0421 gene perturbs H. pylori cell morphology. (A to C) Confocal microscopy profiles depicting morphological patterns of the Hp76Δ421 (A), Hp76 (B), and Hp76Δ421-reconstituted (C) strains. (D) Scatter plots arraying Hp76wt, Hp76Δ421, and Hp76Δ421-reconstituted cells (recons) based on x-size and y-size analyses performed using CellTool software. (E) CellTool analysis output based on plots representing the distribution of Hp76wt, Hp76Δ421, and Hp76Δ421-reconstituted cell populations (recons) according to the aspect ratio. (F to H) Confocal microscopy images for Hp76Δ421 (F), Hp76 (G), and Hp76Δ421-reconstituted (H) cells when the cells were treated with the filamenting drug aztreonam.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Flow cytometry analysis of H. pylori cell populations based on their shape. Representative contour plots of H. pylori populations depicted based on flow cytometry analyses. Forward scatter (FSC) plotted on the x axis and side scatter (SSC) on the y axis are presented with mean. (A and B) The Hp26695 strain was grown in the presence and absence of cholesterol for 48 h (A) and 72 h (B). (C and D) The Hp26695 and Hp26695Δ421 strains were grown for 48 h (C) and 72 h (D).

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Absence of cholesteryl glucosides increased H. pylori cell wall permeability. (A and B) Flow cytometry analysis based on influx rates of EtBr as depicted in the form of PE-A histograms delineating the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) for Hp26695 strain grown in the presence and absence of cholesterol (A). (B) Influx rates of EtBr for Hp26695 and Hp26695Δ421 strains grown for 48 h. (C to F) The bars represent MFIs for wild-type, knockout, and reconstituted strains (as annotated) when treated/incubated with EtBr for 5, 10, and 30 min using cultures grown either at 48 h or 72 h (*, P < 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001).

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Analysis of LPS expression and biofilm formation. (A) Silver-stained SDS-PAGE gel (15%) depicting profiles of LPS from Hp76, Hp76Δ421, and Hp76Δ421-reconstituted strains. (B) Bar graph representing quantification of biofilm formation by H. pylori after 5 days of incubation. The Hp26695 strain data were analyzed by Student’s t test. The Hp76 strain data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison tests. (C and D) qRT-PCR analyses of wecA and wzk genes using RNA isolated from wild-type (Hp26695 and Hp76), knockout (Hp26695Δ421 and Hp76Δ421), and Hp76Δ421-reconstituted strains grown for 48 h. (E) Relative mRNA expression of luxS from 2-day-old broth cultures [ns, nonsignificant difference(s); *, P < 0.05, **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001].

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • TABLE 1

    MICs of wild-type, Δ421 mutants, and Δ421-reconstituted H. pylori strains

    AntibioticMIC (μg/ml) of the following strain(s)a:
    Hp26695Hp26695Δ421Hp76Hp76Δ421Hp76Δ421-
    reconstituted
    Fosfomycin≥1,024 (R)≤1.5 ± 0.5 (S)≥1,024 (R)≤0.064 ± 2 (S)≥1,024 (R)
    Colistin≥256 (R)≤12 ± 3 (S)≥256 (R)≤10 ± 5 (S)≥256 (R)
    Polymyxin B≥256 (R)≤8 ± 4 (S)≥256 (R)≤10 ± 4 (S)≥256 (R)
    Ciprofloxacin≤0.38 ± 0.5 (R)≤0.064 ± 0.02 (S)≤0.50 ± 0.5 (R)≤0.19 ± 0.2 (S)≤0.047 ± 0.08 (R)
    Tetracycline≤10 ± 3 (R)≤0.01 ± 0.02 (S)≤0.50 ± 0.1 (R)≤0.01 ± 0.09 (S)≤0.38 ± 0.18 (R)
    Amoxicillin≤0.47 ± 0.01 (R)≤0.016 ± 0.01 (S)≤0.016 ± 0.01 (S)≤0.016 ± 0.01 (S)≤0.016 ± 0.01 (S)
    Clarithromycin≤0.001 (S)≤0.001 (S)≤0.001 (S)≤0.001 (S)≤0.001 (S)
    • ↵a The letters in parentheses after the MICs indicate whether the strain is resistant (R) or sensitive (S) to the respective antibiotic.

  • TABLE 2

    Primers used in this study

    Target gene of the primerNucleotide sequence of the primer
    hp0421 US FGTGGATTATGACTCTTTAGAGACTTG
    hp0421 US RGTGCCATGGCTCGAGTTAACTACTCTTCTTTAAAATTGAAT
    hp0421 DS FGTGCCATGGCTCGAGTGAAAGGATAAAAAATGCAAGAA
    hp0421 DS RCCAATTTTAGGGCAGGCTAAAAAC
    wecA FATGGTGCTTGGGTTTATGGTG
    wecA RGGCTTTCTGGCGTTTTATTTTG
    wzk FAAACTCAAAGACAACCACGAAG
    wzk RCGACCGCTAAAATCAACAAG
    16s rRNA FGGTAAAATCCGTAGAGATCAAGAGG
    16s rRNA RACAACTAGCATCCATCGTTTAGG
    cds1 FGGATGAATTTTTAGACGATTTGC
    cds1 RCCCTCTTCTTTTTCTTCTTCAGG
    cds3 FCTAAACATGGCAGCTTGATCC
    cds3 RAATGGATTTCAACCACCTTCC
    luxS FTTTGATTGTCAAATACGATGTGC
    luxS RTGTGAGATAAAATCCCGTTTGG

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • FIG S1

    Morphology of H. pylori in the absence of cholesterol in culture and upon deletion of hp0421. (A and B) Confocal microscopy images depicting H. pylori grown in the absence (A) and presence (B) of cholesterol. (C) Scatter plots showing Hp26695 and Hp26695Δ421 cell populations by x size and y size as analyzed by CellTool. (D) Graphical profiles representative of the distribution of Hp26695 and Hp26695Δ421 cell populations according to the aspect ratio and as analyzed by CellTool are shown. (E and F) RNA isolated from and the relative mRNA expression analyses of log-phase cultures of Hp26695 and Hp76 strains as quantified by qRT-PCR of csd1 and csd3 gene loci (ns denotes nonsignificant differences at P ≥ 0.05). Download FIG S1, TIF file, 2.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Qaria et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Morphology of Hp76 strains presented by flow cytometry. Representative contour plots of H. pylori populations when analyzed by flow cytometry; FSC and SSC are shown on the x and y axes, respectively, with mean and median. Hp76Δ421 displayed high FSC and SSC compared to the Hp76 and Hp76Δ421-reconstituted strains grown for 48 h (A) and 72 h (B). Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Qaria et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    The absence of cholesteryl glucosides caused increased cell wall permeability. (A to D) PE-A histograms delineating the influx rates of EtBr represented as MFI for different wild-type and knockout strains grown in culture for different periods and when treated with EtBr at different time points as shown. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Qaria et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Roles of Cholesteryl-α-Glucoside Transferase and Cholesteryl Glucosides in Maintenance of Helicobacter pylori Morphology, Cell Wall Integrity, and Resistance to Antibiotics
Majjid A. Qaria, Naveen Kumar, Arif Hussain, Shamsul Qumar, Sankara N. Doddam, Ludovico P. Sepe, Niyaz Ahmed
mBio Nov 2018, 9 (6) e01523-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01523-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Roles of Cholesteryl-α-Glucoside Transferase and Cholesteryl Glucosides in Maintenance of Helicobacter pylori Morphology, Cell Wall Integrity, and Resistance to Antibiotics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Roles of Cholesteryl-α-Glucoside Transferase and Cholesteryl Glucosides in Maintenance of Helicobacter pylori Morphology, Cell Wall Integrity, and Resistance to Antibiotics
Majjid A. Qaria, Naveen Kumar, Arif Hussain, Shamsul Qumar, Sankara N. Doddam, Ludovico P. Sepe, Niyaz Ahmed
mBio Nov 2018, 9 (6) e01523-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01523-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

H. pylori
cholesteryl glucosides
morphology
membrane permeability
antibiotic susceptibility
biofilm formation
Helicobacter pylori
antibiotic resistance
cell wall integrity

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511