Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Molecular Biology and Physiology

ORBIT: a New Paradigm for Genetic Engineering of Mycobacterial Chromosomes

Kenan C. Murphy, Samantha J. Nelson, Subhalaxmi Nambi, Kadamba Papavinasasundaram, Christina E. Baer, Christopher M. Sassetti
Carol A. Nacy, Editor
Kenan C. Murphy
aDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samantha J. Nelson
aDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Subhalaxmi Nambi
aDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kadamba Papavinasasundaram
aDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina E. Baer
aDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher M. Sassetti
aDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol A. Nacy
Sequella, Inc.
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01467-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Two efficient recombination systems were combined to produce a versatile method for chromosomal engineering that obviates the need to prepare double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) recombination substrates. A synthetic “targeting oligonucleotide” is incorporated into the chromosome via homologous recombination mediated by the phage Che9c RecT annealase. This oligonucleotide contains a site-specific recombination site for the directional Bxb1 integrase (Int), which allows the simultaneous integration of a “payload plasmid” that contains a cognate recombination site and a selectable marker. The targeting oligonucleotide and payload plasmid are cotransformed into a RecT- and Int-expressing strain, and drug-resistant homologous recombinants are selected in a single step. A library of reusable target-independent payload plasmids is available to generate gene knockouts, promoter replacements, or C-terminal tags. This new system is called ORBIT (for “oligonucleotide-mediated recombineering followed by Bxb1 integrase targeting”) and is ideally suited for the creation of libraries consisting of large numbers of deletions, insertions, or fusions in a bacterial chromosome. We demonstrate the utility of this “drag and drop” strategy by the construction of insertions or deletions in over 100 genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. smegmatis.

IMPORTANCE We sought to develop a system that could increase the usefulness of oligonucleotide-mediated recombineering of bacterial chromosomes by expanding the types of modifications generated by an oligonucleotide (i.e., insertions and deletions) and by making recombinant formation a selectable event. This paper describes such a system for use in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis. By incorporating a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) version of the phage Bxb1 attP site into the oligonucleotide and coelectroporating it with a nonreplicative plasmid that carries an attB site and a drug selection marker, we show both formation of a chromosomal attP site and integration of the plasmid in a single transformation. No target-specific dsDNA substrates are required. This system will allow investigators studying mycobacterial diseases, including tuberculosis, to easily generate multiple mutants for analysis of virulence factors, identification of new drug targets, and development of new vaccines.

INTRODUCTION

Following the use of the laborious plasmid cointegration schemes that dominated the early days of gene replacement in bacteria, recent advances in genetic engineering of bacteria have largely relied on phage recombination systems, including both site-specific and homologous systems. For example, it was recognized in 1993 that a nonreplicating plasmid containing the mycobacterial phage L5 attP site could be incorporated into the Mycobacterium smegmatis chromosome via integration into the bacterial attB site (1); a similar system was described a year later for Escherichia coli (2). Such events are dependent on the expression of phage integrases (Int). Thus, genes expressed from endogenous or regulatable promoters could be delivered into the stable confines of the chromosome in single-copy form, without the physiological artifacts of excessive gene copy numbers or the instability of self-autonomous replication vectors. Site-specific recombination (SSR) systems were the basis for development of the Lambda InCh method for transferring exogenous genes to the E. coli attB site (3); development of the series of conditional-replication, integration, and modular (CRIM) plasmids that take advantage of a variety of different phage attB sites in E. coli (4); development of mycobacterial phage vectors for delivery of exogenous sequences to mycobacterial chromosomes (5–7); and for many technical modifications of these SSR systems and their substrates for use in metabolic and genetic engineering protocols in a variety of organisms (8–12).

In addition to these site-specific recombination systems, general homologous recombination (HR) systems of phage, such as the Red system of phage lambda, and the RecET systems of Rac prophage and mycobacterial phage Che9c, have been widely used for genetic engineering in a variety of bacteria (13–19; for reviews, see reference 20, 21, and 22). Termed “recombineering,” these procedures have used both double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides for generating bacterial chromosomal modifications in E. coli and in various bacterial pathogens, including enterohemorrhagic E. coli (23), Salmonella enterica (20, 24–26), Shigella flexneri (27), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28, 29), Yersinia pestis (30, 31), and M. tuberculosis (18, 19). The Che9c RecT system has been especially useful for the verification of drug-resistant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the search for new drug targets for tuberculosis (32, 33). These general phage recombination systems have also been used for the development of new methodologies for metabolic engineering of industrial microorganisms (34–43). In particular, the Red system annealase, λ Beta protein, has been employed in many protocols for the systematic modification of E. coli. For example, oligonucleotides have been electroporated into cells expressing λ Beta to target the promoter regions of genes, allowing accelerated evolution of E. coli for specific metabolic engineering purposes (44). In concert with these homologous recombination systems, the SSR systems described above have been employed to remove selectable drug cassettes for the construction of markerless gene deletions and fusions (14, 16, 45).

The new system described in this report couples the recombinogenic annealing of an oligonucleotide and the site-specific insertion of a nonreplicating plasmid into a one-step procedure for generating chromosomally tagged genes, deletions, or promoter replacements in M. smegmatis or M. tuberculosis. It takes advantage of a voluminous amount of work done in the laboratory of G. Hatfull on both the Bxb1 phage integration system (5, 46–52) and the Che9 RecET recombineering system (17, 19), without which the development of this methodology would not be possible. It is the first general chromosomal engineering technique that produces a drug-selectable recombinant that does not require the use of either target-specific dsDNA plasmids or PCR-generated recombination substrates. The only target-specific substrate requirement for gene modification is a chemically synthesized oligonucleotide. This “targeting oligo” carries the ssDNA version of the Bxb1 phage attP site (48 bases) flanked by 45 to 70 bases of homology to the chromosomal target and is coelectroporated with a nonreplicating “payload plasmid” that contains a Bxb1 attB site. The host (M. smegmatis or M. tuberculosis) contains a plasmid that expresses both the Che9c phage RecT annealase and the Bxb1 phage integrase. RecT promotes annealing of the targeting oligonucleotide to the lagging strand template of the replication fork, thus placing the attP site into a precise location in the chromosome dictated by the oligonucleotide sequence. In the same outgrowth period, Bxb1 integrase promotes site-specific recombination between the coelectroporated attB-containing payload plasmid and the oligonucleotide-derived attP site. In this system, the sequence of the oligonucleotide defines the position of the insertion site and the plasmid delivers the payload. For knockouts, the oligonucleotide is designed such that attP replaces the target gene. For C-terminal tags, the oligonucleotide is designed to insert attP at the end of the coding sequence. In this case, the type of C-terminal tag desired is defined by the selection of the plasmid to be coelectroporated with the oligonucleotide from a library of preexisting payload plasmids. Inherently in this system, a single oligonucleotide designed to create a C-terminal tag can be used with multiple plasmids to create fluorescent, degradation, and epitope-tagged fusions. This new gene modification scheme is called ORBIT (for “oligonucleotide-mediated recombineering followed by Bxb1 integrase targeting”). We describe the use of the system to generate over 100 gene knockouts and fusions in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis at high efficiency. This system could easily be employed in other bacteria as well, provided that an ssDNA annealing protein (most likely from an endogenous phage system) is available for use (see Discussion).

RESULTS

RecT-promoted oligonucleotide-mediated recombineering—60-bp insertion.Two different types of recombineering methodologies have been applied to mycobacteria, but neither represents a broadly generalizable approach for genome engineering. Target-specific dsDNA substrates can be used to make diverse and selectable mutations. However, while PCRs with long oligonucleotides can extend homologous regions to lengths of 100 to 150 bp, the most efficient recombinant frequencies are obtained with a selectable marker containing ∼500 bp of flanking homology. When many genes are being interrogated, these dsDNA constructs can be cumbersome to generate for each desired mutation. In contrast, single-stranded oligonucleotides are easily synthesized and can be used to alter one or a few bases of the chromosome at high efficiency. However, these mutations are generally not selectable and are therefore difficult to isolate. An ideal method would leverage easily synthesized and highly efficient oligonucleotide substrates to make selectable mutations. We sought to accomplish this by encoding a phage attachment site (attP) in the oligonucleotide that could be used to integrate a selectable marker at a specific chromosomal site via site-specific recombination.

To test the feasibility of this idea, an assay was designed to measure the frequency of incorporation of an oligonucleotide containing an insertion of approximately the size of a 48-bp attP site into the mycobacterial chromosome. For this purpose, a hygromycin resistance (Hygr) gene, with an internal 60-bp deletion, was integrated into the L5 phage attachment site of the M. smegmatis chromosome. Oligonucleotides (180-mers) targeting the lagging strand template of the impaired Hygr marker and containing the missing 60 bases (as well as 60 bases flanking the deletion site) were electroporated into M. smegmatis expressing the Che9c RecT annealase from the anhydrotetracycline (ATc)-inducible Ptet promoter (pKM402) (32). The frequency of oligonucleotide incorporation was determined as the number of Hygr transformants among the survivors of electroporation (Fig. 1a). The number of Hygr transformants generated ranged from fewer than 10 to over 300, depending on the amount of oligonucleotide used (Fig. 1b). At about 1 μg of oligonucleotide, the total number of Hygr recombinants plateaued at approximately 350 transformants/ml, which corresponds to a frequency of 2 × 10−6 recombinants per survivor of electroporation. In an experiment where the target contained a 1-bp change creating a premature stop codon in the hyg resistance gene, a 60-base oligonucleotide was used to restore Hyg resistance at a frequency of 4 × 10−4 recombinants per survivor of electroporation. Thus, the RecT annealase is capable of integrating an oligonucleotide that contains a 60-base insertion into the mycobacterial chromosome, albeit at a frequency which is ∼500-fold lower than that seen with a single base pair change.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

RecT-promoted oligonucleotide-mediated 60-base insertion. (a) Diagram of oligonucleotide-mediated recombineering of a chromosomal target in M. smegmatis. An integrating plasmid (pKM433) at the L5 phage attachment site contains a mutated hyg resistance gene due to an internal 60-bp deletion (red square). Electroporation of an oligonucleotide containing the 60 bases missing in the target gene, along with 60 bp of flanking DNA on each side, was electroporated into cells expressing the Che9c RecT function from pKM402. (b) After induction of RecT and preparation of the cells for transformation (as described in Materials and Methods), the cells were electroporated with various amounts of an oligonucleotide (180 mer) that spans the 60-bp deletion of the Hyg resistance cassette in pKM433. Cells were grown overnight in 7H9 broth, and half the culture volume was plated on LB-Hyg plates. The experiment was performed in triplicate; standard errors are shown.

Development of ORBIT.To convert the recombineering of an oligonucleotide into a selectable event, we determined if coelectroporation of the attP-containing oligonucleotide with an attB-containing nonreplicating vector (Hygr) into a cell that expresses both the RecT annealase and the phage Bxb1 integrase would allow both homologous and site-specific recombination events to occur within the same outgrowth period. Since the oligonucleotide is designed to direct the integration of the genetic information contained in the nonreplicating plasmid, these elements were termed “targeting oligonucleotide” and “payload plasmid.”

Two plasmids were generated to test this methodology. pKM444 produces the recombination functions. This mycobacterial shuttle vector expresses both the Che9c phage RecT annealase and the Bxb1 phage integrase (Int) from an anhydrotetracycline (ATc)-inducible Ptet promoter (Fig. 2a). pKM446 is a payload plasmid that does not replicate in mycobacteria. This vector includes a hyg resistance marker for selection in mycobacteria and a Bxb1 attB site (Fig. 2b). Adjacent to the attB site is a sequence encoding both a Flag tag and a DAS+4 peptide tag designed to be in frame with a targeted chromosomal gene following integration of the plasmid. The DAS+4 tag directs a fusion protein for degradation via the ClpXP system upon expression of the SspB adapter protein (53, 54). Targeting oligonucleotides were designed to direct the integration of attP to the 3′ ends of the M. smegmatis recA, divIVA, and leuB genes, immediately before the stop codon. A site-specific recombination event between the inserted attP and the coelectroporated pKM446 would generate a DAS+4 fusion to these target genes (see Table S1 in the supplemental material for the list of oligonucleotides used in this study). Targeting oligonucleotides, which anneal to the lagging strand template of the replication fork, were coelectroporated with the pKM446 payload plasmid into M. smegmatis expressing both Che9c RecT annealase and Bxb1 integrase. Among the Hygr colonies resulting from these transformations, 9 of 12 candidates tested by PCR contained the expected recombinant structure, in which pKM446 was inserted between attR and attL sites at the predicted oligonucleotide-directed integration site (Fig. 2c to e). The fusion of the target genes to the Flag-DAS+4 degradation tag was verified by sequencing the PCR products of the 5′ junctions. The design of the ORBIT oligonucleotide used to create the recA–Flag-DAS+4 fusion is described in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material; the relevant sequence of the pKM446-integrating plasmid is shown in Fig. S2, and the sequence of a generic chromosomal Flag-DAS+4 fusion in shown in Fig. S3.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Plasmids constructed for ORBIT. (a) Construct pKM444 expresses the Che9c phage RecT annealase and the Bxb1 phage integrase, both driven from the Ptet promoter. A similar construct (pKM461) additionally contains the sacRB counter-selectable marker for curing the plasmid following gene modification. (b) One of the ORBIT payload plasmids (pKM446) used for integration into the chromosomal attP site created by an oligonucleotide. In this case, the plasmid payload contains a Flag-DAS+4 inducible degradation tag that is ultimately going to be fused to the 3′ end of the target gene. Camr, chloramphenicol resistance. (c) Three genes in M. smegmatis were targeted for C-terminal tagging. Following the ORBIT protocol for each target gene, the total numbers of colonies obtained (from multiple trials) ranged between 20 to 200 CFU/transformation. Electroporations performed with payload plasmid only (no targeting oligonucleotides) produced, on average, 5-fold-lower total numbers of colonies. The number of correct recombinants (of 4 candidates tested) for each target gene is shown. (d) PCR analysis of the 5′ junctions of each candidate tested. (e) Primer positions for verification by PCR of the recombinants are shown. Blue arrows, 5′ junction; brown arrows, 3′ junction. In each case where a 5′ junction was verified, the 3′ junction was also verified (not shown). The 5′ junctions were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

FIG S1

Design of the ORBIT oligonucleotide. The Bxb1 attP sequence is placed between the last codon and the stop codon of the M. smegmatis recA gene. The attP site (brown) is flanked by 70 bases of recA C-terminal sequence (blue) and 70 bases of downstream sequence (black), including the recA stop codon (red). Given the rules for selecting the lagging strand for efficient recombineering (see Fig. S4), the reverse complement of the sequence shown here was used as the ORBIT oligonucleotide. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 3.0 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Murphy et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

ORBIT integrating plasmid pKM446. The integrating pKM446 plasmid contains an attB site, the Flag tag, and the DAS+4 tag. A “CG” base pair is inserted between attB and the Flag tag to ensure that the tags are in frame with the target gene following integration of the plasmid. For this to occur, the ORBIT oligonucleotide has to be designed as described in the Fig. S1 legend. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.5 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Murphy et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Chromosomal layout of an ORBIT-promoted Flag-DAS+4 fusion. The sequence shown contains the last codon of the target gene (NNN), the 43-bp attL site (orange-brown) created by a crossover between attP and attB (the crossover core sequence is underlined) and a CG base pair (violet), which was included in the ORBIT integrating plasmid to fuse the 43-bp attL site to both the Flag tag (green) and the DAS+4 tag (blue). Finally, a double stop codon for the chromosomal fusion is supplied by the payload plasmid (red). Note that, as required, the attL site lacks a stop codon. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.5 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Murphy et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

ORBIT oligonucleotides for M. tuberculosis target genes and M. smegmatis target genes. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.05 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Murphy et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

To test the functionality of the tag and to verify that the mutated locus represented the only copy of the targeted gene in the cell, we took advantage of the DAS+4 sequence, which promotes degradation of the tagged proteins upon induction of SspB in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis (55–57). Two different sspB expression systems were used, both of which induce degradation of the target protein either by adding ATc (Tet-OFF) or by removing ATc (Tet-ON).

Cells containing the recA-DAS+4 fusion were transformed with pGMCgS-TetON-18, allowing the induction of SspB in the absence of ATc; RecA function was then quantified using a UV resistance assay. Grown in the presence of ATc, the recA-DAS+4-tagged strain containing the SspB-expressing plasmid and a strain containing a control plasmid showed nearly identical levels of UV sensitivity (Fig. 3a, right). In contrast, the sensitivity of the tagged strain with SspB was enhanced in the absence of ATc (Fig. 3a, left). The divIVA and leuB DAS+4-tagged strains were transformed with pGMCgS-TetOFF-18, which produces SspB upon ATc addition. In both cases, addition of ATc inhibited the growth of these mutants, consistent with the essentiality of these genes on the media used in this study (Fig. 3b and c). The defect of LeuB depletion could be reversed by the addition of leucine to the plates, verifying that that this phenotype was linked to the engineered mutation (data not shown). Thus, the ORBIT method could generate function-altering mutations without the need to construct either target-specific plasmids or long dsDNA recombineering substrates.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Knockdown phenotypes of ORBIT-generated DAS+4-tagged strains. The growth phenotypes of the Flag-DAS+4 tagged strains constructed as described in the Fig. 2 legend were analyzed after transformation of an SspB-expressing plasmid. (a) The recA–Flag-DAS+4 strain was transformed with an SspB-producing plasmid, pGMCgS-TetON-18 (streptomycin resistance [Strepr]), under the control of the reverse TetR repressor. In this scenario, RecA is degraded in the absence of anhydrotetracycline (ATc). Ten-fold serial dilutions of the cells grown overnight without ATc were spotted on LB-streptomycin plates, either with or without ATc, and the cells were exposed to 20 J/m2 of UV. Preferential UV sensitivity of the recA–Flag-DAS+4 strain in the absence of ATc was determined by comparing the levels of growth seen with and without the inducer. (b) The divIVA–Flag-DAS+4 strain was transformed with an SspB-producing plasmid, pGMCgS-TetOFF-18 (Strepr), under the control of the wild-type TetR repressor. In this case, DivIVA is expected to be depleted in the presence of ATc. Preferential growth of the DivIVA–Flag-DAS+4 strain on LB plates in the presence of ATc was determined by comparing the levels of growth seen with and without the inducer. (c) The experiment was performed as described for panel B, except that leuB was the target and the cells were plated on 7H10-AD plates.

The scheme of using RecT and Bxb1 integrase simultaneously to promote modification of a chromosomal target gene is diagrammed in Fig. 4; the process is called ORBIT (for “oligonucleotide-mediated recombineering followed by Bxb1 integrase targeting”). In theory, targeting oligonucleotides could also be designed to delete a portion of the chromosome during the ORBIT reaction (Fig. 4, right side) to create knockouts. Demonstrations of such ORBIT-promoted knockouts are described below.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

ORBIT-promoted gene alteration. The ORBIT process is initiated at the replication fork. An oligomer containing a single-stranded version of the Bxb1 attP site (top pictures, red lines) is coelectroporated with an attB-containing nonreplicating plasmid into a mycobacterial host cell expressing both RecT annealase and Bxb1 integrase. RecT promotes annealing of the oligonucleotide to the lagging strand template. Following DNA replication through this region, an attP site is formed in the chromosome (middle pictures). In the same outgrowth period, Bxb1 integrase promotes site-specific insertion of the plasmid into the chromosome (attB × attP). (Left side) The oligonucleotide is designed such that attP is inserted just before the stop codon. The integration event fuses the GFP tag in frame to the 3′ end of the target gene (with an attL site in frame between them); the recombinant is selected for by Hygr. (Right side) The oligonucleotide is designed such that attP replaces the target gene and the plasmid integration event allows hygromycin resistance to be used to select for the knockout.

Parameters of ORBIT-promoted gene targeting.Two features of ORBIT that were optimized were the length of the homologous arms (HAs) in the targeting oligonucleotide and the relative amounts of oligonucleotide and nonreplicating plasmid used for coelectroporation. The HAs of a polA-targeting oligonucleotide were adjusted to lengths of 50 to 70 bases (oligonucleotide lengths, including attP, were 148 to 188 bases in length). In each case, the attP sequence was placed between the last codon of polA and its stop codon (similarly to the recA oligonucleotide used as described above; see Fig. S1). The oligonucleotides were mixed with 200 ng of payload plasmid pKM446 and transformed into M. smegmatis containing pKM444 induced with ATc; a gentamicin-resistant integrating plasmid was included as a transformation control. While there was variability with respect to the number of Hyg-resistant transformants from each electroporation, oligonucleotides containing longer HAs produced more transformants (Fig. 5a). For HAs with sequences below 40 bp in length, no Hygr transformants were observed above the number seen in the no-oligonucleotide control (data not shown).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Parameters of the ORBIT process. (A) The amount of target homology flanking the attP site in an oligonucleotide designed to create a polA–Flag-DAS+4 fusion in M. smegmatis was examined as a function of recombinant formation (Hygr). One microgram of each oligonucleotide was electroporated with 200 ng of pKM446. The frequency of targeting is expressed as the percentage of Hygr transformants following integration of pKM446 relative to a transformation control (20 ng of gentamicin resistance [Genr] plasmid pKM390). Experiments were performed in triplicate; standard errors are shown. Gent, gentamicin. (B) Colony counts were determined after electroporation of 1 μg of an oligonucleotide with 70-base flanks (designed to create a polA–Flag-DAS+4 fusion) with various amounts of pKM446. CFU counts per milliliter were determined following overnight growth of the electroporation mixtures in 2 ml LB. Experiments were performed in triplicate; standard errors are shown.

We also examined the optimal ratio of oligonucleotide to plasmid. Targeting oligonucleotide (1 μg) was coelectroporated with various amounts of the pKM446 payload plasmid. More Hygr transformants were observed when more plasmid was used, but there was also a small increase in the number of oligonucleotide-independent transformants that presumably represent illegitimate recombinants (Fig. 5b). PCR screening confirmed that 39/40 Hygr transformants recovered in this experiment (using 8 candidates of each transformation) represented the desired oligonucleotide-directed recombination events. As a rule, we generally combined 1 μg of oligonucleotide with 200 ng of plasmid in the transformations described below.

ORBIT-promoted knockdowns and knockouts in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis.To determine if ORBIT-promoted modifications could be generally engineered throughout the chromosome, we targeted a variety of genes in M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis. For C-terminal tags, the attP site was placed between the last translating codon of the target gene and its stop codon (see Fig. S1 for how attP is placed within the M. smegmatis recA gene to create a C-terminal fusion). The ORBIT system is designed such that all oligonucleotides used for any type of C-terminal fusion are constructed in a similar manner (i.e., with the attP site placed as indicated in Fig. S1). This is important, as all ORBIT-integrating plasmids that are designed to generate C-terminal fusions have a 2-bp sequence (CG) placed between the attB site and the relevant tag (see Fig. S2). These 2 bp, together with the 43 bp of the attL site created after integration, ensure that all target genes are translationally fused to the tag supplied by the integrating vector (see Fig. S3 for details). For knockouts, the attP site was flanked by 60 to 70 bases, which typically included the first and last 10 codons of the target gene (including the start and termination codons), which is expected to result in the deletion of intervening chromosomal sequence. Overall, we have made over 100 strains where the target genes were either deleted or C-terminally tagged (see Fig. 6 and Tables 1 and 2). For most of these targets, between 5 to 50 colonies typically arose after plating 25% of the overnight outgrowth (0.5 ml), though in some cases, plates contained over 100 colonies. Usually, only 2 to 4 Hygr candidates were analyzed by PCR to identify at least one strain that contained the payload plasmid integrated into the site designated by the targeting oligonucleotide. Most of the targeting oligonucleotides used for these genomic modifications contained either 60 or 70 bases of flanking homology. An oligonucleotide targeting the aceE gene containing only 45 bases of homology on each side of attP also produced the desired recombinant in 4 of 6 clones. However, lowering flanking homologies to below 40 bases decreased the percentage of correct recombinants dramatically, largely as a result of an increased number of illegitimate recombination events.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

ORBIT-generated insertions and deletions in M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis. Gene deletions and modifications were performed at a variety of positions in the chromosomes of both M. tuberculosis (a) and M. smegmatis (b) using ORBIT. In most cases, the oligonucleotides contained an attP site flanked by 70 bases of target homology. Insertions (C-terminal DAS+4 or His-Flag tags) are shown in red, deletions are shown in blue, and GFP tags are shown in green. Descriptions of all the modifications performed by ORBIT are provided in Table 1 (for M. smegmatis) and Table 2 (for M. tuberculosis).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

ORBIT-promoted M. smegmatis modifications

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

ORBIT-promoted M. tuberculosis modifications

In order to cure recombinants of the RecT-Int-producing plasmid following modification, pKM461, a sacB-containing derivative of pKM444, was constructed. A number of genes were tagged in a pKM461-bearing strain (including M. smegmatis recG, dnaN, and ftsK) and were then plated directly on Hyg-sucrose plates both to select for the recombinant and to cure the strain of the RecT-Int producer. This process appears to produce moderately fewer colonies than had been observed previously with pKM444 but can more rapidly produce plasmid-free mutants.

Genetic modifications with ORBIT should be stable. An excision event promoted by the Bxb1 SSR system requires an additional factor (called gp47 [49]) which is not present in the hosts used for these experiments. The stability of ORBIT-mediated modifications was verified by observing that the pKM468 integrated payload plasmid, after integration into the M. smegmatis MSMEG_3596 and MSMEG_0250 genes, was not lost after more than 100 generations of growth in the absence of drug selection, as shown by detection of equal numbers of colonies on LB plates with and without ATc. In addition, both PCR analysis and fluorescence microscopy were employed to verify the continued presence of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) tag in both strains.

All the ORBIT-promoted gene modifications described in Tables 1 and 2 were done with M. smegmatis or M. tuberculosis already transformed with either pKM444 or pKM461. In order to investigate the possibility that transient expression of RecT and Bxb1 integrase would be sufficient to promote recombinant formation by ORBIT, we deleted the oriM sequence from pKM444 and electroporated the resulting plasmid with pKM446 and an ORBIT oligonucleotide designed to fuse the Flag-DAS+4 tag to the C-terminal end of dnaN. In standard ORBIT experiments, this target typically gave the highest number of colonies relative to other M. smegmatis genes, possibly as a result of its close proximity to the chromosomal origin of replication. However, in experiments performed using the pKM444 derivative missing oriM, the numbers of colonies observed were no greater than the numbers of colonies observed with cells that were transformed with the plasmids but not with the oligonucleotide. Furthermore, results of PCR analyses of eight candidates from this experiment were negative for the presence of the 5′ junction of the expected recombinant. It seems likely that RecT is required to be present in abundance prior to entry of the oligonucleotide into the cell to protect the oligonucleotide from digestion by cellular nucleases and/or to efficiently deliver the oligonucleotide to the replication fork.

Expanding the library of ORBIT-mediated modifications.In order to expand the types of modifications that can be made via ORBIT, we built a set of payload plasmids containing the Bxb1 attB site fused to different types of tags. In addition to the Flag-DAS+4 plasmids, we generated plasmids to create C-terminal targeted fusions with combinations of enhanced GFP (eGFP), mVenus, SNAP, CLIP, Myc and His epitopes and tobacco etch virus (TEV) cleavage sites. These tags facilitate both protein localization studies performed by fluorescence analysis and affinity purifications (Table 3). In addition, we created plasmids to generate chromosomal knockouts and promoter replacements using either hygromycin resistance or zeocin resistance (Zeor) as a method of selection for the recombinant (see Table 3). Any number of payload plasmids can be matched with a single targeting oligonucleotide to generate a variety of functional gene modifications.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

ORBIT integration plasmidsa

As with any chromosomal engineering method, one must consider the effect of the modification on expression of downstream functions, especially if the target gene is within an operon. The pKM464 ORBIT knockout plasmid was designed such that once integrated, the hyg gene is positioned at the junction of the insertion site, allowing downstream genes to be transcribed by the hyg promoter. In our experience, this is generally sufficient for the generation of most mutations (see Table 1 for knockouts generated in M. smegmatis). For additional options, pKM495 (for Flag-DAS+4 tags) and pKM496 (for knockouts) contain an additional promoter (PGroEL) to drive higher transcription levels downstream of the insertion site (Table 3). Similar plasmids can be generated with promoters of various strengths, as needed.

GFP fusions.To demonstrate the functionality of these additional tags, ORBIT was used to construct eGFP fusions with a number of M. smegmatis genes. We tagged DnaN (the beta subunit of DNA polymerase III) and MmpL3 (the essential mycolate transporter suspected to reside at the pole), two proteins known to be located in discrete cytoplasmic foci, and three genes with unknown distribution patterns. The pKM468 eGFP payload plasmid (Table 3) was used to tag each gene in situ at the endogenous chromosomal locus. MmpL3-eGFP and DnaN-eGFP were concentrated at the predicted localization site of each protein (Fig. 7). For DnaN-GFP, the punctate spots identify positions of the replication forks that occurred in nonpolar regions of the cell (see Fig. 7), in accordance with previous observations (58). eGFP-tagged alleles of MSMEG_3596, SppA, and ClpC were found at distinct sites, a result which differed from the diffuse cytosolic distribution of unfused eGFP. Overall, ORBIT is a rapid and efficient method to modify native genes in the chromosome with functionally distinct tags without having to create target- and modification-specific dsDNA recombination substrates. Also, by expressing each gene at its native level, aberrant localization or complex formation due to overexpression can be avoided.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

ORBIT-generated GFP fusions. M. smegmatis cells containing GFP-tagged target genes were grown in 7H9-AD-Tween 80 to an optical density of 0.8. One microliter of the culture was spotted on an agarose pad for microscopy. Each bacterial strain was imaged using differential interference contrast (DIC) and GFP channels, as described in Material and Methods.

Promoter replacements.One can also integrate attB-containing ORBIT plasmids to change the endogenous levels of expression of a chromosomal gene. We constructed a series of ORBIT plasmids containing promoters of different strengths that can be used to drive the expression of genes downstream of the plasmid insertion site (see the promoter replacement plasmids listed in Table 3). To use these plasmids, the ORBIT oligonucleotide is designed to replace the endogenous promoter with attP. The target gene’s ribosome-binding site, if recognized, can also be deleted, replaced, or left intact, depending on the final level of expression desired. To test this scheme, we performed ORBIT in an M. smegmatis strain where a chromosomal lacZ gene is under the control of the mycobacterial PAg85 promoter containing a weak ribosome-binding site.

ORBIT was used to replace PAg85 with one of three different promoters: Pimyc, PGroEL, or P38. Plasmids containing these promoters are listed according to increasing strength of expression (D. Schnappinger, personal communication). The promoters were transferred to ORBIT integration plasmids and placed upstream of the Bxb1 attB site (see Fig. 8a). An optimized ribosome-binding site (rbs: AGAAAGGAGGAAGGA) was included between the promoters and the attB site to increase the overall level of expression of β-galactosidase relative to the starting strain, where an endogenous Shine-Delgarno sequence could not be recognized. In this arrangement, the final recombinant had an attR site situated between the promoter-SD sequence and the translational start site of the target gene (see Fig. 8a). (Alternatively, an altered SD sequence can be included in the oligonucleotide sequence, thereby placing it closer to the start codon of the target gene.) ORBIT recombinants were identified by resistance to zeocin and verified by chromosomal PCR analysis as described above. The total amount of β-galactosidase in each extract increased in accordance with the expected strengths of the three promoters used in these assays (Fig. 8b). Thus, endogenous promoters can be easily replaced to modify the expression level of a chromosomally located target gene.

FIG 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8

Promoter replacements. (a) Diagram of ORBIT-generated promoter replacements. In the nonreplicating plasmid, the promoter to be inserted into the chromosome is placed to the left of the attB site. A TrrnB terminator is placed upstream of this promoter to prevent read-through from the plasmid backbone. The oligonucleotide is designed to place attP just upstream of the target gene in place of the endogenous promoter. Following integration, the promoter and inserted ribosome-binding site drive expression of the chromosomal target gene (lacZ). (b) ORBIT was carried out with plasmids pKM496 (PGroEL), pKM508 (Pimyc), and pKM509 (P38) with an oligonucleotide that deletes the endogenous promoter. Extracts of the cells were made, and beta-galactosidase assays were performed in triplicate (standard error bars are shown). The higher amounts of beta-galactosidase present in the engineered strains, relative to the starting strain, were likely due to the presence of the optimized ribosome-binding site following each promoter.

Markerless gene deletions.The ORBIT protocol represents a unique way to construct markerless gene deletions in a process involving reversal of plasmid integration step. The Bxb1 phage produces the gp47 protein, which has been shown to be a recombination directionality factor (RDF) (49). Along with the Bxb1 integrase, gp47 acts to promote site-specific recombination between attL and attR, restoring the attP site. By replacing recT with gp47 in pKM461 and exchanging the Hygr gene with a Zeor cassette (ble), a plasmid was generated that expresses both gp47 and integrase under the control of Ptet (pKM512). The M. smegmatis ORBIT-generated deletion strain ΔMSMEG_4392, not yet cured of the Kanr plasmid pKM461, was transformed with pKM512 (Zeor), grown in the presence of anhydrotetracycline (ATc), and plated on 7H10-sucrose plates as described in Materials and Methods. Of 37 colonies of strain ΔMSMEG_4392 treated in this manner, 7 were sensitive to hygromycin; in addition, all of them were sensitive to both kanamycin and zeocin. Site-specific recombination between the attR and attL sites replaces the deleted portion of MSMEG_4392 with the attP site, creating an in-frame deletion, which was verified by sequencing in 4 of the 7 HygS colonies described above. Thus, mutants of mycobacteria devoid of any antibiotic resistance can be generated following construction of ORBIT-generated deletions.

DISCUSSION

The λ Red recombineering system has been critical for genome engineering of E. coli and related bacteria. While λ Red does not function well in bacteria more distantly related to E. coli, endogenous phage recombination systems have been identified and employed to promote recombineering in these organisms. One of the more notable examples of a phage recombination system utilized in this way is the Che9c mycobacterial RecET system, identified by Van Kessel and Hatfull and used for recombineering of the M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis chromosomes (18, 19, 22). This recombineering system has been used to construct numerous knockouts and modifications of mycobacterial targets (22, 32, 59, 60). However, unlike λ Red recombineering in E. coli, PCR substrates of 50-bp flanking homology do not work efficiently for recombineering in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis, though longer homologies can be added by PCRs performed with long oligonucleotides containing 50 to 100 bp of additional target homologies (61). To increase recombination efficiency further, one needs to construct recombineering substrates containing ∼500 bp of flanking homology for each specific modification. Similarly, specialized transduction also requires the laborious construction and packaging of a different recombination substrate-containing phagemid for each genome modification (62).

ORBIT overcomes the limitations of existing methods by combining components of two different efficient recombination systems from mycobacteria: the Che9c annealase from the general homologous recombination system and the Bxb1 integrase from the site-specific recombination system. The construction of long dsDNA recombination substrates is replaced by the synthesis of a targeting oligonucleotide, and the availability of a library of payload plasmids allows a single oligonucleotide to be used to generate a wide variety of functional modifications. The ability to direct the insertion of functionally distinct payloads creates a precise and versatile “drag and drop” strategy for genome engineering.

The utility of ORBIT extends beyond the simple generation of mutants. Since targeting oligonucleotides are easily generated, the system is well suited for the construction of libraries of mutants. The targeting oligonucleotide loop containing the 48-bp attP site can be extended to 60 bp (Fig. 1) to include a nearly infinite number of unique DNA barcode sequences, which would allow each mutant in a large ORBIT-generated pool to be monitored independently by PCR or next-generation sequencing. The variety of modifications that can be made with the existing collection of payload plasmids opens new avenues for functional screening of mutant libraries that are generated using this method. ORBIT can also be used for genome reduction strategies in M. tuberculosis. The largest deletion generated in this study was the one-step 12-kb deletion of the pks12 gene, and it is likely that larger deletions are possible. Finally, though most of the payload plasmids described in this report were designed to modify endogenous genes, one could also use this strategy to place exogenous elements, such as large clusters of biosynthetic genes, into any specified position in the mycobacterial chromosome.

The paradigm of ORBIT is likely to be useful in many different bacterial species. The Bxb1 integrase requires no host functions to carry out the site-specific and directional (attB × attP) recombination reaction. It is for these reasons that Bxb1 integrase has been selectively employed for genetic manipulations in both bacterial and mammalian cells (63, 64). Thus, the key to the development of ORBIT for other microbial systems would be to find a λ Beta or RecT-like annealase that promotes some level of oligonucleotide-mediated recombineering. Datta et al. (65) have tested a number of single-stranded annealing proteins (SSAPs) from both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria for oligonucleotide-mediated recombineering in E. coli. While the recombineering efficiency ranged over 3 orders of magnitude, some SSAPs from distant species worked as well as the λ Beta protein in E. coli, suggesting that some annealases are easily transferable between species. An annealase appropriate for use in ORBIT would have to be able to promote annealing of an oligonucleotide containing a 48-bp attP insertion. Note, however, that even if oligonucleotide recombineering were to occur at low frequencies (∼10−6) with such a substrate, the number of attP sites generated could very well be adequate for the Bxb1 integrase to promote integration of a nonreplicating plasmid, thus making integration of the oligonucleotide a selectable event.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.The M. smegmatis strains used in this study were derived from mc2155; the M. tuberculosis strains were all derived from H37Rv.

Media.M. smegmatis was grown in Middlebrook 7H9 broth with 0.05% Tween 80, 0.2% glycerol, 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.2% dextrose, and 0.085% NaCl; transformants were selected on LB plates (Difco) with appropriate drugs. M. tuberculosis was grown in 7H9 broth with 0.05% Tween 80, 0.2% glycerol, and OADC (oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase; Becton, Dickinson); transformants were selected on 7H10 plates with 0.5% glycerol and OADC. When needed, the following antibiotics (concentrations) were added: kanamycin (20 μg/ml), streptomycin (20 μg/ml), hygromycin (50 μg/ml), and zeocin (25 μg/ml).

Plasmids.Plasmids containing the Pimyc promoter (66), the PGroEL promoter, and P38 promoter were obtained from D. Schnappinger and S. Ehrt, as were plasmids pGMCgS-TetOFF-18 and pGMCgS-TetON-18, where the E. coli SspB adapter protein is under the control of the wild-type and reverse TetR repressors, respectively. Plasmids constructed for this study are described in Tables 3 and 4 and are available at the Addgene plasmid repository site. Details of plasmid constructions are available upon request.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

ORBIT-testing and RecT-Int-expressing plasmids

Oligonucleotides.Oligonucleotides used for ORBIT were obtained from IDT as Ultramers at a concentration of 100 uM and delivered in 96-well plates; they were supplied desalted with no further purification. Oligonucleotides were diluted 10-fold in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and final concentrations (250 to 350 ng/ml) were determined by analysis of absorbance maxima at 260 nm (Abs260) using a conversion factor of an optical density (OD) of 1 = 20 μg/ml oligonucleotide. ORBIT plasmids (200 ng) were mixed with 1 μg of oligonucleotide prior to electroporation, unless stated otherwise in figure legends.

Design of the ORBIT oligonucleotide.The sequence of oligonucleotides flanking the attP site used for ORBIT must be derived from the lagging strand of the replication fork. For design of an ORBIT oligonucleotide, a dsDNA sequence file of a target gene was created, starting 200 bp upstream of the initiation codon and ending 200 bp downstream of the stop codon. The Bxb1 attP site (shown in Fig. S4 in the supplemental material) was inserted into the target sequence file for the type of modification required (i.e., knockout, C-terminal tag, or promoter replacement) as described in Results. For selection of the lagging strand, the rules are as follows: if the transcriptional direction of the target gene is pointing toward the chromosomal origin in either replicore (green arrows in Fig. S4), then select the top strand (5′ to 3′) of the “target sequence + attP” file as the lagging strand DNA in the oligonucleotide. If the transcriptional direction of the target gene is pointing away from the chromosomal origin in either replicore (red arrows in Fig. S4), then select the bottom strand (5′ to 3′) of the “target sequence + attP” file as the lagging strand in the oligonucleotide. The example shown in Fig. S4 is for M. smegmatis. Apply the same rules for M. tuberculosis, but assume that the dif region occurs at 2.2 Mb. For further details, see reference 22.

FIG S4

Design of the ORBIT oligonucleotide. To identify the lagging strand from a sequence file of a target gene (reading 5′ to 3′ from the start codon), the attP site is first inserted into the desired position. The ORBIT oligonucleotide sequence will correspond to the top strand if the target gene is transcribed toward the ori sequence (see, e.g., the green arrows) or to the bottom strand if the target gene is transcribed toward the dif region (see, e.g., the red arrows). Download FIG S4, TIF file, 1.5 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Murphy et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

ORBIT electroporations.A culture of M. smegmatis containing plasmid pKM444 (or pKM461) was started overnight by adding 100 to 150 μl of a fresh saturated stock culture to 20 ml of 7H9 media containing 20 μg/ml kanamycin in a 125-ml flask. Cells were grown on a swirling platform at 37°C. The next day, at an OD (600 nm) of 0.5, anhydrotetracycline (ATc) was added to reach a final concentration of 500 ng/ml. The culture was placed back on the swirling platform at 37°C for 2.5 to 3 h until the culture OD was ∼1.0. The culture was then placed on ice (with swirling) for 10 min and centrifuged in 50-ml conical tubes at 4,000 rpm for 10 min in a chilled centrifuge. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was gently resuspended in 2 ml of 10% cold glycerol and then brought up to 20 ml with 10% cold glycerol. The tube was inverted a few times to promote mixing. The centrifugation and washing steps were repeated. After the second wash, the cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 2 ml of 10% cold glycerol. Aliquots (380 μl) of electrocompetent cells were added to sterile Eppendorf tubes containing 1 μg of an attP-containing oligonucleotide and 200 ng of an attB-containing plasmid (except where noted otherwise in figure legends). The cells and DNA were mixed by pipetting and transferred to ice-cooled electroporation cuvettes (0.2 cm path length). The cells were shocked with an electroporator at settings of 2.5 kV, 1,000 Ω, and 25 μF. Following electroporation, the cells were resuspended in 2 ml 7H9 media and rolled at 37°C overnight. The following day, two 0.5-ml portions of the culture were spread on LB plates containing 50 μg/ml hygromycin (or 25 μg/ml zeocin). Plates were incubated for 4 to 5 days at 37°C, and recombinant candidate colonies were picked and suspended in 2 ml 7H9 media containing 50 μg/ml hygromycin (or 25 μg/ml zeocin) and grown overnight at 37°C. Control electroporations with plasmid but without oligonucleotides were also performed.

Electroporations with M. tuberculosis were performed in a similar manner, with the following modifications. Cells containing pKM444 (or pKM461) were grown in 30 ml 7H9 media containing OADC, 0.2% glycerol, 0.05% Tween 80, and 20 μg/ml kanamycin. At an OD of ∼0.8, ATc was added to the culture to reach a final concentration of 500 ng/ml. After ∼8 h of swirling at 37°C, 3 ml of 2 M glycine was added to the culture. The cells were shaken at 37°C overnight (16 h to 20 h in total following induction), collected by centrifugation, and processed as described above, except that all steps were performed at room temperature. Recombinant candidate colonies were picked after 3 weeks into 5 ml 7H9-OADC-Tween containing 50 μg/ml hygromycin and grown with shaking for 4 to 5 days at 37°C.

PCR analysis for verification of recombinants.Recombinants were verified by PCR analysis; Taq polymerase was obtained from Denville Scientific, Inc. PCRs were performed with 30-μl volumes and contained 125 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DSMO), 1 μM primers, 2 μl of an M. smegmatis overnight culture (or of a heat-inactivated M. tuberculosis culture), and 0.2 μl of Taq polymerase. M. tuberculosis cells (OD around 1.5) were heat inactivated at 85°C for 50 min prior to removal from the biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory. The PCR program consisted of an initial step of 95°C for 5 min (to lyse the cells); 30 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 1 min at 72°C; and a final polymerization step of 5 min at 72°C. Correctly sized PCR fragments were generated from both junctions of the payload plasmid inserted into the chromosome (see Fig. 2e). In each case, the 5′ junction was verified by the use of a target-specific primer and an “oriE” primer (CCTGGTATCTTTATAGTCCTGTCG); the 3′ junction was verified by the use of a target-specific primer and a “HygC-out” primer (TGCACGGGACCAACACCTTCGTGG or GAGGAACTGGCGCAGTTCCTCTGG). In some cases, the 5′ junction PCR was verified by sequencing. Target-specific primers contained sequences at least 100 bp upstream (5′) and downstream (3′) of the chromosomal sequences flanking the attP site in the ORBIT oligonucleotide. For knockouts, an additional PCR was performed to verify the absence of the target gene in the recombinant.

Spot titer assays.Following ORBIT-promoted C-terminal tagging of M. smegmatis recA, divIVA, and leuB genes, cells were transformed with either pGMCgS-TetOFF-18 or pGMCgS-TetON-18 (SspB-producing plasmids) by selection for streptomycin resistance (20 μg/ml); ORBIT plasmid pKM444 (Kanr) was not cured beforehand. Cells were grown overnight in 7H9-AD-Tween broth containing 20 μg/ml streptomycin. Ten-fold serial dilutions of the cultures were made in phosphate-bufferd saline (PBS)-Tween, and 10-μl volumes of the dilutions were spotted on LB or 7H10-AD-Tween plates containing 20 μg/ml streptomycin, either with or without 500 ng/ml anhydrotetracycline. Plates were wrapped in aluminum foil and incubated for 3 to 4 days at 37°C. For the recA strains, plates were exposed to UV prior to incubation. See the Fig. 3 legend for additional details.

Fluorescence microscopy.Bacterial cells were mounted on 1% agar pads and imaged with a DeltaVision Personal DV microscope followed by deconvolution using SoftwoRx software (Applied Precision). Further processing was performed using FIJI software (67). Image brightness and contrast were adjusted for visibility, and the files were converted to 600 dots per inch (dpi). Representative cells are shown from multiple images of each strain.

Beta-galactosidase activity assay.A 5-ml volume of culture at an OD of 0.8 to 1.0 was pelleted and resuspended in 1 ml of freshly prepared Z buffer (50 mM Na2HPO4 [pH 7.0], 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol). Cells were lysed by bead beating 4 times at 6.5 m/s for 30 s followed by centrifugation for 10 min to harvest the supernatant. Protein concentrations were measured with a NanoDrop instrument. For the activity assay, 10-μg volumes of protein and Z buffer (total volume of 100 μl) were added in triplicate to a 96-well microplate. The reaction was started with 20 μl of 4 mg/ml o-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (ONPG) mixed with sodium phosphate buffer (0.1 M; pH 7.0). Once sufficient yellow color had developed, the reaction was terminated with 50 μl of 1 M sodium carbonate. Final absorbance of the sample was measured at 420 nm in a plate reader.

Markerless gene deletions.The M. smegmatis ORBIT-generated deletion strain ΔSMEG_4392 harboring the pKM464 plasmid (Hygr) was transformed with pKM512 (Zeor), a plasmid expressing the Bxb1 excisionase functions (gp47 and Int) and SacRB. The selection for zeocin resistance allows curing of pKM461 (Kanr) by plasmid incompatibility. After overnight growth of the Zeor transformant in 7H10 containing 500 ng/ml anhydrotetracycline, cells were plated on 7H10 plates containing 10% sucrose. Single colonies from these plates were streaked on 7H10, 7H10-Hyg, and 7H10-Zeo plates. Colonies found sensitive to hygromycin were also sensitive to both kanamycin and zeocin.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Angélica Maria Rivera, Desmond Goodwin, and Sookyung Kim for technical support. We thank Graham Hatfull for the gift of the pJV53 plasmid and the pJL37 derivative containing gp47, Dirk Schnappinger and Sabine Ehrt for plasmids and for sharing unpublished observations, and Eric Rubin for early discussions on the concept of this technology. We also thank Michelle Bellerose, Yi Cai, and Clare Smith for sharing results of ORBIT modifications performed.

This work was supported by the TB gift program of The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, and by the National Institutes of Health (AI132130 and AI064282 to C.M.S.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 10 July 2018
    • Accepted 19 October 2018
    • Published 11 December 2018
  • Copyright © 2018 Murphy et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lee MH,
    2. Hatfull GF
    . 1993. Mycobacteriophage L5 integrase-mediated site-specific integration in vitro. J Bacteriol 175:6836–6841. doi:10.1128/jb.175.21.6836-6841.1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hasan N,
    2. Koob M,
    3. Szybalsk W
    . 1994. Escherichia coli genome targeting, I. Cre-lox-mediated in vitro generation of ori− plasmids and their in vivo chromosomal integration and retrieval. Gene 150:51–56. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(94)90856-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Boyd D,
    2. Weiss DS,
    3. Chen JC,
    4. Beckwith J
    . 2000. Towards single-copy gene expression systems making gene cloning physiologically relevant: lambda InCh, a simple Escherichia coli plasmid-chromosome shuttle system. J Bacteriol 182:842–847. doi:10.1128/JB.182.3.842-847.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Haldimann A,
    2. Wanner BL
    . 2001. Conditional-replication, integration, excision, and retrieval plasmid-host systems for gene structure-function studies of bacteria. J Bacteriol 183:6384–6393. doi:10.1128/JB.183.21.6384-6393.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kim AI,
    2. Ghosh P,
    3. Aaron MA,
    4. Bibb LA,
    5. Jain S,
    6. Hatfull GF
    . 2003. Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 integrates into the Mycobacterium smegmatis groEL1 gene. Mol Microbiol 50:463–473. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03723.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Morris P,
    2. Marinelli LJ,
    3. Jacobs-Sera D,
    4. Hendrix RW,
    5. Hatfull GF
    . 2008. Genomic characterization of mycobacteriophage Giles: evidence for phage acquisition of host DNA by illegitimate recombination. J Bacteriol 190:2172–2182. doi:10.1128/JB.01657-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Pham TT,
    2. Jacobs-Sera D,
    3. Pedulla ML,
    4. Hendrix RW,
    5. Hatfull GF
    . 2007. Comparative genomic analysis of mycobacteriophage Tweety: evolutionary insights and construction of compatible site-specific integration vectors for mycobacteria. Microbiology 153:2711–2723.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gaj T,
    2. Sirk SJ,
    3. Barbas CF, III..
    2014. Expanding the scope of site-specific recombinases for genetic and metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 111:1–15. doi:10.1002/bit.25096.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Krappmann S
    . 2014. Genetic surgery in fungi: employing site-specific recombinases for genome manipulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:1971–1982. doi:10.1007/s00253-013-5480-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Nkrumah LJ,
    2. Muhle RA,
    3. Moura PA,
    4. Ghosh P,
    5. Hatfull GF,
    6. Jacobs WR, Jr.,
    7. Fidock DA
    . 2006. Efficient site-specific integration in Plasmodium falciparum chromosomes mediated by mycobacteriophage Bxb1 integrase. Nat Methods 3:615–621. doi:10.1038/nmeth904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Olorunniji FJ,
    2. Rosser SJ,
    3. Stark WM
    . 2016. Site-specific recombinases: molecular machines for the genetic revolution. Biochem J 473:673–684. doi:10.1042/BJ20151112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Srivastava V,
    2. Thomson J
    . 2016. Gene stacking by recombinases. Plant Biotechnol J 14:471–482. doi:10.1111/pbi.12459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Murphy KC
    . 1998. Use of bacteriophage lambda recombination functions to promote gene replacement in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 180:2063–2071.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Buchholz F,
    3. Muyrers JP,
    4. Stewart AF
    . 1998. A new logic for DNA engineering using recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat Genet 20:123–128. doi:10.1038/2417.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Yu D,
    2. Ellis HM,
    3. Lee EC,
    4. Jenkins NA,
    5. Copeland NG,
    6. Court DL
    . 2000. An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:5978–5983. doi:10.1073/pnas.100127597.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Datsenko KA,
    2. Wanner BL
    . 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6640–6645. doi:10.1073/pnas.120163297.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Marinelli LJ,
    2. Hatfull GF,
    3. Piuri M
    . 2012. Recombineering: a powerful tool for modification of bacteriophage genomes. Bacteriophage 2:5–14. doi:10.4161/bact.18778.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. van Kessel JC,
    2. Hatfull GF
    . 2007. Recombineering in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Methods 4:147–152. doi:10.1038/nmeth996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. van Kessel JC,
    2. Hatfull GF
    . 2008. Efficient point mutagenesis in mycobacteria using single-stranded DNA recombineering: characterization of antimycobacterial drug targets. Mol Microbiol 67:1094–1107. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06109.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sawitzke JA,
    2. Thomason LC,
    3. Costantino N,
    4. Bubunenko M,
    5. Datta S,
    6. Court DL
    . 2007. Recombineering: in vivo genetic engineering in E. coli, S. enterica, and beyond. Methods Enzymol 421:171–199. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(06)21015-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Murphy KC
    . 11 January 2016, posting date. λ recombination and recombineering. EcoSal Plus 2016. doi:10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0011-2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Murphy KC,
    2. Papavinasasundaram K,
    3. Sassetti CM
    . 2015. Mycobacterial recombineering. Methods Mol Biol 1285:177–199. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2450-9_10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Murphy KC,
    2. Campellone KG
    . 2003. Lambda Red-mediated recombinogenic engineering of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic E. coli. BMC Mol Biol 4:11. doi:10.1186/1471-2199-4-11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Czarniak F,
    2. Hensel M
    . 2015. Red-mediated recombineering of Salmonella enterica genomes. Methods Mol Biol 1225:63–79. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1625-2_4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Nasvall J,
    2. Knoppel A,
    3. Andersson DI
    . 2017. Duplication-insertion recombineering: a fast and scar-free method for efficient transfer of multiple mutations in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 45:e33. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1078.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Uzzau S,
    2. Figueroa-Bossi N,
    3. Rubino S,
    4. Bossi L
    . 2001. Epitope tagging of chromosomal genes in Salmonella. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:15264–15269. doi:10.1073/pnas.261348198.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ranallo RT,
    2. Barnoy S,
    3. Thakkar S,
    4. Urick T,
    5. Venkatesan MM
    . 2006. Developing live Shigella vaccines using lambda Red recombineering. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 47:462–469. doi:10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00118.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Lesic B,
    2. Rahme LG
    . 2008. Use of the lambda Red recombinase system to rapidly generate mutants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BMC Mol Biol 9:20. doi:10.1186/1471-2199-9-20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Liang R,
    2. Liu J
    . 2010. Scarless and sequential gene modification in Pseudomonas using PCR product flanked by short homology regions. BMC Microbiol 10:209. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Derbise A,
    2. Lesic B,
    3. Dacheux D,
    4. Ghigo JM,
    5. Carniel E
    . 2003. A rapid and simple method for inactivating chromosomal genes in Yersinia. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 38:113–116. doi:10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00181-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sun W,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Curtiss R. III.
    , 2008. Highly efficient method for introducing successive multiple scarless gene deletions and markerless gene insertions into the Yersinia pestis chromosome. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:4241–4245. doi:10.1128/AEM.00940-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Ioerger TR,
    2. O’Malley T,
    3. Liao R,
    4. Guinn KM,
    5. Hickey MJ,
    6. Mohaideen N,
    7. Murphy KC,
    8. Boshoff HIM,
    9. Mizrahi V,
    10. Rubin EJ,
    11. Sassetti CM,
    12. Barry CE,
    13. Sherman DR,
    14. Parish T,
    15. Sacchettini JC
    . 2013. Identification of new drug targets and resistance mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One 8:e75245. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075245.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Singh V,
    2. Dhar N,
    3. Pató J,
    4. Kolly GS,
    5. Korduláková J,
    6. Forbak M,
    7. Evans JC,
    8. Székely R,
    9. Rybniker J,
    10. Palčeková Z,
    11. Zemanová J,
    12. Santi I,
    13. Signorino-Gelo F,
    14. Rodrigues L,
    15. Vocat A,
    16. Covarrubias AS,
    17. Rengifo MG,
    18. Johnsson K,
    19. Mowbray S,
    20. Buechler J,
    21. Delorme V,
    22. Brodin P,
    23. Knott GW,
    24. Aínsa JA,
    25. Warner DF,
    26. Kéri G,
    27. Mikušová K,
    28. McKinney JD,
    29. Cole ST,
    30. Mizrahi V,
    31. Hartkoorn RC
    . 2017. Identification of aminopyrimidine-sulfonamides as potent modulators of Wag31-mediated cell elongation in mycobacteria. Mol Microbiol 103:13–25. doi:10.1111/mmi.13535.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kolisnychenko V,
    2. Plunkett G, III.,
    3. Herring CD,
    4. Feher T,
    5. Posfai J,
    6. Blattner FR,
    7. Posfai G
    . 2002. Engineering a reduced Escherichia coli genome. Genome Res 12:640–647. doi:10.1101/gr.217202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Alper H,
    2. Fischer C,
    3. Nevoigt E,
    4. Stephanopoulos G
    . 2005. Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:12678–12683. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504604102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Gross F,
    2. Ring MW,
    3. Perlova O,
    4. Fu J,
    5. Schneider S,
    6. Gerth K,
    7. Kuhlmann S,
    8. Stewart AF,
    9. Zhang Y,
    10. Muller R
    . 2006. Metabolic engineering of Pseudomonas putida for methylmalonyl-CoA biosynthesis to enable complex heterologous secondary metabolite formation. Chem Biol 13:1253–1264. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.09.014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Miao V,
    2. Coëffet-Le Gal M-F,
    3. Nguyen K,
    4. Brian P,
    5. Penn J,
    6. Whiting A,
    7. Steele J,
    8. Kau D,
    9. Martin S,
    10. Ford R,
    11. Gibson T,
    12. Bouchard M,
    13. Wrigley SK,
    14. Baltz RH
    . 2006. Genetic engineering in Streptomyces roseosporus to produce hybrid lipopeptide antibiotics. Chem Biol 13:269–276. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.12.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Murphy KC
    . 2009. Chromosomal engineering strategies, chapter 7, p 7-1 to 7-28. In Smolke CD (ed), The metabolic pathway engineering handbook: tools and applications. CRC Press—Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
  39. 39.↵
    1. Hu S,
    2. Fu J,
    3. Huang F,
    4. Ding X,
    5. Stewart AF,
    6. Xia L,
    7. Zhang Y
    . 2014. Genome engineering of Agrobacterium tumefaciens using the lambda Red recombination system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:2165–2172. doi:10.1007/s00253-013-5412-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Gust B,
    2. Challis GL,
    3. Fowler K,
    4. Kieser T,
    5. Chater KF
    . 2003. PCR-targeted Streptomyces gene replacement identifies a protein domain needed for biosynthesis of the sesquiterpene soil odor geosmin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:1541–1546. doi:10.1073/pnas.0337542100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Wenzel SC,
    2. Gross F,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Fu J,
    5. Stewart AF,
    6. Muller R
    . 2005. Heterologous expression of a myxobacterial natural products assembly line in pseudomonads via red/ET recombineering. Chem Biol 12:349–356. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.12.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Fu J,
    2. Wenzel SC,
    3. Perlova O,
    4. Wang J,
    5. Gross F,
    6. Tang Z,
    7. Yin Y,
    8. Stewart AF,
    9. Muller R,
    10. Zhang Y
    . 2008. Efficient transfer of two large secondary metabolite pathway gene clusters into heterologous hosts by transposition. Nucleic Acids Res 36:e113. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Katashkina JI,
    2. Hara Y,
    3. Golubeva LI,
    4. Andreeva IG,
    5. Kuvaeva TM,
    6. Mashko SV
    . 2009. Use of the lambda Red-recombineering method for genetic engineering of Pantoea ananatis. BMC Mol Biol 10:34. doi:10.1186/1471-2199-10-34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Wang HH,
    2. Isaacs FJ,
    3. Carr PA,
    4. Sun ZZ,
    5. Xu G,
    6. Forest CR,
    7. Church GM
    . 2009. Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature 460:894–898. doi:10.1038/nature08187.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Cherepanov PP,
    2. Wackernagel W
    . 1995. Gene disruption in Escherichia coli: TcR and KmR cassettes with the option of Flp-catalyzed excision of the antibiotic-resistance determinant. Gene 158:9–14. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(95)00193-A.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Mediavilla J,
    2. Jain S,
    3. Kriakov J,
    4. Ford ME,
    5. Duda RL,
    6. Jacobs WR, Jr.,
    7. Hendrix RW,
    8. Hatfull GF
    . 2000. Genome organization and characterization of mycobacteriophage Bxb1. Mol Microbiol 38:955–970.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Ghosh P,
    2. Kim AI,
    3. Hatfull GF
    . 2003. The orientation of mycobacteriophage Bxb1 integration is solely dependent on the central dinucleotide of attP and attB. Mol Cell 12:1101–1111. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00444-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Ghosh P,
    2. Pannunzio NR,
    3. Hatfull GF
    . 2005. Synapsis in phage Bxb1 integration: selection mechanism for the correct pair of recombination sites. J Mol Biol 349:331–348. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Ghosh P,
    2. Wasil LR,
    3. Hatfull GF
    . 2006. Control of phage Bxb1 excision by a novel recombination directionality factor. PLoS Biol 4:e186. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Savinov A,
    2. Pan J,
    3. Ghosh P,
    4. Hatfull GF
    . 2012. The Bxb1 gp47 recombination directionality factor is required not only for prophage excision, but also for phage DNA replication. Gene 495:42–48. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2011.12.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Singh S,
    2. Ghosh P,
    3. Hatfull GF
    . 2013. Attachment site selection and identity in Bxb1 serine integrase-mediated site-specific recombination. PLoS Genet 9:e1003490. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003490.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Keenholtz RA,
    2. Grindley ND,
    3. Hatfull GF,
    4. Marko JF
    . 2016. Crossover-site sequence and DNA torsional stress control strand interchanges by the Bxb1 site-specific serine recombinase. Nucleic Acids Res 44:8921–8932. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw724.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. McGinness KE,
    2. Baker TA,
    3. Sauer RT
    . 2006. Engineering controllable protein degradation. Mol Cell 22:701–707.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Kim J-H,
    2. O'Brien KM,
    3. Sharma R,
    4. Boshoff HIM,
    5. Rehren G,
    6. Chakraborty S,
    7. Wallach JB,
    8. Monteleone M,
    9. Wilson DJ,
    10. Aldrich CC,
    11. Barry CE,
    12. Rhee KY,
    13. Ehrt S,
    14. Schnappinger D
    . 2013. A genetic strategy to identify targets for the development of drugs that prevent bacterial persistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:19095–19100. doi:10.1073/pnas.1315860110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Klotzsche M,
    2. Ehrt S,
    3. Schnappinger D
    . 2009. Improved tetracycline repressors for gene silencing in mycobacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 37:1778–1788. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    1. Kim JH,
    2. Wei JR,
    3. Wallach JB,
    4. Robbins RS,
    5. Rubin EJ,
    6. Schnappinger D
    . 2011. Protein inactivation in mycobacteria by controlled proteolysis and its application to deplete the beta subunit of RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res 39:2210–2220. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Schnappinger D,
    2. Ehrt S
    . 17 January 2014. Regulated expression systems for mycobacteria and their applications. Microbiol Spect doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.MGM2-0018-2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. 58.↵
    1. Santi I,
    2. Dhar N,
    3. Bousbaine D,
    4. Wakamoto Y,
    5. McKinney JD
    . 2013. Single-cell dynamics of the chromosome replication and cell division cycles in mycobacteria. Nat Commun 4:2470. doi:10.1038/ncomms3470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Meniche X,
    2. Otten R,
    3. Siegrist MS,
    4. Baer CE,
    5. Murphy KC,
    6. Bertozzi CR,
    7. Sassetti CM
    . 2014. Subpolar addition of new cell wall is directed by DivIVA in mycobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E3243–E3251. doi:10.1073/pnas.1402158111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    1. Wei JR,
    2. Krishnamoorthy V,
    3. Murphy K,
    4. Kim JH,
    5. Schnappinger D,
    6. Alber T,
    7. Sassetti CM,
    8. Rhee KY,
    9. Rubin EJ
    . 2011. Depletion of antibiotic targets has widely varying effects on growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:4176–4181. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018301108.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Marinelli LJ,
    2. Piuri M,
    3. Swigoňová Z,
    4. Balachandran A,
    5. Oldfield LM,
    6. van Kessel JC,
    7. Hatfull GF
    . 2008. BRED: a simple and powerful tool for constructing mutant and recombinant bacteriophage genomes. PLoS One 3:e3957. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003957.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Bardarov S,
    2. Bardarov S, Jr.,
    3. Pavelka MS, Jr.,
    4. Vasan Sambandamurthy V,
    5. Larsen M,
    6. Tufariello J,
    7. Chan J,
    8. Hatfull G,
    9. Jacobs WR, Jr..
    2002. Specialized transduction: an efficient method for generating marked and unmarked targeted gene disruptions in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. bovis BCG and M. smegmatis. Microbiology 148:3007–3017. doi:10.1099/00221287-148-10-3007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. 63.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Tang B,
    3. Ye Y,
    4. Mao Y,
    5. Lei X,
    6. Zhao G,
    7. Ding X
    . 2017. Bxb1 integrase serves as a highly efficient DNA recombinase in rapid metabolite pathway assembly. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 49:44–50. doi:10.1093/abbs/gmw115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Xu Z,
    2. Thomas L,
    3. Davies B,
    4. Chalmers R,
    5. Smith M,
    6. Brown W
    . 2013. Accuracy and efficiency define Bxb1 integrase as the best of fifteen candidate serine recombinases for the integration of DNA into the human genome. BMC Biotechnol 13:87. doi:10.1186/1472-6750-13-87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.↵
    1. Datta S,
    2. Costantino N,
    3. Zhou X,
    4. Court DL
    . 2008. Identification and analysis of recombineering functions from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and their phages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:1626–1631. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709089105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    1. Kaps I,
    2. Ehrt S,
    3. Seeber S,
    4. Schnappinger D,
    5. Martin C,
    6. Riley LW,
    7. Niederweis M
    . 2001. Energy transfer between fluorescent proteins using a co-expression system in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Gene 278:115–124. doi:10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00712-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. 67.↵
    1. Schindelin J,
    2. Arganda-Carreras I,
    3. Frise E,
    4. Kaynig V,
    5. Longair M,
    6. Pietzsch T,
    7. Preibisch S,
    8. Rueden C,
    9. Saalfeld S,
    10. Schmid B,
    11. Tinevez J-Y,
    12. White DJ,
    13. Hartenstein V,
    14. Eliceiri K,
    15. Tomancak P,
    16. Cardona A
    . 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
ORBIT: a New Paradigm for Genetic Engineering of Mycobacterial Chromosomes
Kenan C. Murphy, Samantha J. Nelson, Subhalaxmi Nambi, Kadamba Papavinasasundaram, Christina E. Baer, Christopher M. Sassetti
mBio Dec 2018, 9 (6) e01467-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01467-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
ORBIT: a New Paradigm for Genetic Engineering of Mycobacterial Chromosomes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
ORBIT: a New Paradigm for Genetic Engineering of Mycobacterial Chromosomes
Kenan C. Murphy, Samantha J. Nelson, Subhalaxmi Nambi, Kadamba Papavinasasundaram, Christina E. Baer, Christopher M. Sassetti
mBio Dec 2018, 9 (6) e01467-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01467-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Mycobacterium smegmatis
bacteriophage genetics
gene replacement
genetic fusions
metabolic engineering
promoter replacements
recombineering
tuberculosis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511