Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Applied and Environmental Science

Engineering Kluyveromyces marxianus as a Robust Synthetic Biology Platform Host

Paul Cernak, Raissa Estrela, Snigdha Poddar, Jeffrey M. Skerker, Ya-Fang Cheng, Annika K. Carlson, Berling Chen, Victoria M. Glynn, Monique Furlan, Owen W. Ryan, Marie K. Donnelly, Adam P. Arkin, John W. Taylor, Jamie H. D. Cate
Sang Yup Lee, Editor
Paul Cernak
aDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raissa Estrela
aDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Snigdha Poddar
aDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
bInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey M. Skerker
cDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
dBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ya-Fang Cheng
eEnergy Biosciences Institute, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annika K. Carlson
cDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Berling Chen
fDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria M. Glynn
gDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monique Furlan
hDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Owen W. Ryan
aDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie K. Donnelly
iDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam P. Arkin
cDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
dBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
jEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John W. Taylor
iDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie H. D. Cate
aDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
fDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
kMolecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sang Yup Lee
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01410-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing and mating-type switching in K. marxianus. (A) CRISPRNHEJ and CRISPRHDR systems. K. marxianus transformed with the pKCas plasmid generates small indels near the cut site, a common product of nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) repair of the DNA double-strand break. When transformed with both the pKCas plasmid and a donor DNA, homologous recombination products are seen in the target site. (B) Yeast life cycle. Haploid MATa and MATα switch mating type by transposases α3 and Kat1 in K. lactis. Haploid cells conjugate to form MATa/MATα diploids. Diploids undergo meiosis to form haploid spores that germinate to complete the life cycle. (C) Mature a- and α-pheromones from K. marxianus aligned with the S. cerevisiae and K. lactis sequences. Red indicates nonconserved amino acids between K. marxianus a- and α-factors. Amino acids are marked as identical (*), with similar polarity (:), or with different polarity (.). (D) Incubation of putative heterothallic MATa and MATα strains with a cocktail of both mature α-factor pheromones (KmMfα1 and -2) results in mating projections from the MATa strain only (*).

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Creation of heterothallic K. marxianus strains. (A) Auxotrophic mating assay of Km1 strains. Shown are results from strains Km1 MATα α3– kat1– leu2–, Km1 MATa α3– kat1– leu2–, and homothallic Km1 leu2–, streaked through strain Km1 MATa α3– kat1– trp1– on 2% glucose plates and replica plated onto SCD − (Leu, Trp) plates after 2 days. Diploid growth is seen only upon sexual crossing between strains with opposite mating types or with homothallic haploid strains. (B) Auxotrophic mating assay of several α3– kat1– leu2– triple-inactivation strains and Km1 MATa α3– kat1– trp1– or Km1 MATα α3– kat1– trp1–. Putative heterothallic strains were spotted over the negative control (−), the Km1 MATa α3– kat1– trp1– reference (a), or the Km1 MATα α3– kat1– trp1– reference (α) on glucose plates for mating. Replica plating onto SCD − (Leu, Trp) results in diploid growth. (C) The wild homothallic isolate Km18 was made trp– by UV mutagenesis and crossed with heterothallic Km1 MATa α3– kat1– leu2–. Diploids were sporulated, 16 spores were isolated (a through p) and germinated, and the resulting haploids were screened for heterothallic strains by crossing with Km1 MATa α3– kat1– trp1– or Km1 MATα α3– kat1– trp1–. Screened haploids were auxotrophic strains unable to mate (c, d, f, i, j, and o), possible trp– revertants (h, k, n, and p), homothallic (g), or heterothallic (a, b, e, l, and m).

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Lipogenesis of K. marxianus strains. (A) Nile red fluorescence flow cytometry of 11 wild-type isolates after 24, 48, 72, and 96 h at 42°C in lipogenesis medium. Experiments were carried out in biological triplicate, with means and standard deviations shown. (B) DIC images superimposed with epifluorescence microscopy of Nile red-stained cells. Little or no fluorescence is seen after 24 h in 2% glucose. After 24 h in 8% glucose at 42°C (Km19 and Km6) and 48 h (Km18), fluorescence is seen encompassing the majority of the cell volume. (C) TLC analysis of Km19 total lipids after 24 h in 8% glucose at 42°C. Lane 1, ladder of standards containing steryl ester (SE), fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), triacylglycerols (TAG), and free fatty acids (FFA). Lane 2, Km19 lipids.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Genetic dissection of lipogenesis of a high-producing K. marxianus strain, Km6. (A) General overview of lipid-related metabolism. Genes in red were inactivated with CRISPRNHEJ, and genes in green were overexpressed using plasmids. (B) Percentage of fatty acids in dry cell weight (DCW) after 24 h under lipogenic conditions at 42°C for several variants of Km6 (wild type and mutants). (C) Percentage of fatty acids in dry cell weight for several Km6 variants containing ACC1, DGA1, and ACL1/2 overexpression plasmids. In panels B and C, all experiments were carried out in biological triplicate, with mean values and standard deviations shown. Lipogenesis medium in panels B and C contained monosodium glutamate instead of ammonium sulfate.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Selection of K. marxianus strains with combined beneficial traits. (A) Selection strategy. Km19 and Km17 were crossed, sporulated, and then germinated at 44°C to select for thermotolerant segregants. Single segregants were isolated and tested for lipid production, transformability, and high-temperature growth. (B) Fatty acid percentage in dry cell weight (DCW) for several segregants from the Km17 × Km19 cross and the parental strains. Three segregants have similar profiles to the more lipogenic parental strain (Km19). Experiments are from biological triplicates with mean and standard deviation shown. (C) Growth curves at 45°C for the segregants 4B, 5E, and 2G, as well as parental strains Km17 and Km19, in biological triplicate. Km19 is unable to grow at this temperature. Growth curves for parental strains at 30, 37, and 42°C can be found in the supplemental material (Fig. S7A), as well as for segregants at 30 and 37°C (Fig. S7B). (D) Transformation efficiency for several segregants normalized by Km17 transformation efficiency. Experiments are from 2 to 4 biological replicates with normalized mean and standard deviations shown.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • TABLE 1

    List of wild-type K. marxianus strains used in this work

    StrainaDesignation no. by:
    ATCCNCYCCBSNRRL
    Km1
    Km2100221006432Y-665
    Km546537851397Y-2415
    Km6143608Y-8281
    Km92654825976556Y-7571
    Km1136907587
    Km1610606396Y-1550
    Km178635/28910Y-1190
    Km181089Y-2265
    Km1926348
    Km20
    Km21
    • ↵a Km1, Km20, and Km21 were isolated from sugarcane bagasse piles. Km1 was isolated at Raceland Raw Sugar Corporation, Raceland, LA. Km20 and Km21 were isolated at the Sugarcane Growers’ Cooperative, Belle Glade, FL.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • FIG S1

    Cas9 editing outcomes and efficiency for several K. marxianus genes. (A) CRISPRNHEJ results for KmURA3-targeting experiments in the absence of donor DNA. Three regions were targeted, and small insertions and deletions were found upon repair of double-strand breaks by the NHEJ machinery. (B) Small indels can also be observed when targeting KmKAT1 and KmALPHA3 genes. (C) Editing efficiency across 10 different K. marxianus genes is around 75%, with some genes more editing prone than others. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 2.66 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Cernak et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S1

    List of engineered K. marxianus strains. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Cernak et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    K. marxianus mating. (A) K. marxianus a- and α-factor protein sequences. Mature pheromones (in red) derive from precursor proteins, mating factor a (MFA1 and MFA2) and mating factor α (MFα1). We identified two putative MFA genes as well as the MFα gene (KmMFα1 encoding 2 isotypes, KmMFα1 and KmMFα2) in the K. marxianus genome by reciprocal BLASTp using the S. cerevisiae and K. lactis protein sequences as queries. (B) Proposed architecture of K. marxianus MATa, MATα, HMRa, and HMLα loci. Black arrows indicate annealing sites for the genotyping primers (Table S2). PCR of an a-type strain yielded an ∼3,480-bp product, while the α-type yielded an ∼6,500-bp PCR product. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.56 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Cernak et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    DNA sequences for sgRNA spacers, primers, and genes. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.05 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Cernak et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    Kat1 and α3 rescue of mating-type switching. Plasmid-based ectopic expression of Kat1 and α3 restores mating-type switching in MATa α3– kat1– and MATα α3– kat1–, respectively. SCD − (Leu, Trp) plates are shown where only diploid strains are able to grow. (A) Ectopic expression of Kat1 allowed a stable MATa α3– kat1– leu2– strain to switch to MATα and mate with the MATa α3– kat1– trp1– reference strain. (B) Similarly, ectopic expression of α3 allowed some MATα transformants to switch to MATa and mate with the MATα reference strain. Note that some MATα transformants did not switch to MATa, keeping the ability to mate with MATa. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.70 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Cernak et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S4

    Lipogenesis of K. marxianus strains. (A) Strains grown on 8% cellobiose. Shown is mean Nile red fluorescence flow cytometry of 11 wild-type isolates after 24, 48, 72, and 96 h at 42°C in lipogenesis medium containing 8% cellobiose. Maximum values do not surpass 30% of the value obtained for the top lipid-producing strain grown on glucose. Experiments were carried out in biological triplicate, with means and standard deviations shown. (B) Lipid accumulation in K. marxianus strains. Shown are Km19, Km17, and Km6 percentages of fatty acids in dry cell weight after 24 h in 8% glucose at 42°C and 250 rpm. Lipogenesis medium contained ammonium sulfate instead of monosodium glutamate for this set of measurements. Measurements were from biological triplicates, with mean and standard deviation shown. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 0.35 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Cernak et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S5

    Fatty acid composition of Km6-derived strains. Eight fatty acids were measured using GC-FID; no appreciable difference in composition was seen among the strains, except for mutant Km6 eht1– bearing the ACC1 overexpression plasmid. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 0.95 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Cernak et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S6

    Nile red staining and flow cytometry for each single segregant from the Km17 × Km19 cross. The diploids from this cross were sporulated, and spores were germinated at high temperature (44°C). Ninety-one spores were collected, grown under the lipogenesis condition, treated with Nile red, and subjected to flow cytometry. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 0.29 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Cernak et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S7

    Temperature dependence of the growth of K. marxianus strains tested for lipogenesis. (A) Growth curves of Km17 and Km19 in 50 ml YPD medium at 30, 37, 42, and 45°C and 250 rpm. Experiments are from biological triplicates. (B) Growth curves of the highly lipogenic isolates from mating Km17 and Km19. Cells were grown in 50 ml YPD medium at 250 rpm at 30 and 37°C. Experiments are from biological triplicates. Download FIG S7, TIF file, 0.80 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Cernak et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Engineering Kluyveromyces marxianus as a Robust Synthetic Biology Platform Host
Paul Cernak, Raissa Estrela, Snigdha Poddar, Jeffrey M. Skerker, Ya-Fang Cheng, Annika K. Carlson, Berling Chen, Victoria M. Glynn, Monique Furlan, Owen W. Ryan, Marie K. Donnelly, Adam P. Arkin, John W. Taylor, Jamie H. D. Cate
mBio Sep 2018, 9 (5) e01410-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01410-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Engineering Kluyveromyces marxianus as a Robust Synthetic Biology Platform Host
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Engineering Kluyveromyces marxianus as a Robust Synthetic Biology Platform Host
Paul Cernak, Raissa Estrela, Snigdha Poddar, Jeffrey M. Skerker, Ya-Fang Cheng, Annika K. Carlson, Berling Chen, Victoria M. Glynn, Monique Furlan, Owen W. Ryan, Marie K. Donnelly, Adam P. Arkin, John W. Taylor, Jamie H. D. Cate
mBio Sep 2018, 9 (5) e01410-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01410-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

CRISPR-Cas9
Kluyveromyces marxianus
lipogenesis
mating
renewable chemicals
thermotolerant yeast

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511