Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article

The Integrative Conjugative Element (ICE) of Mycoplasma agalactiae: Key Elements Involved in Horizontal Dissemination and Influence of Coresident ICEs

Eric Baranowski, Emilie Dordet-Frisoni, Eveline Sagné, Marie-Claude Hygonenq, Gabriela Pretre, Stéphane Claverol, Laura Fernandez, Laurent Xavier Nouvel, Christine Citti
Paul Keim, Editor
Eric Baranowski
aIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilie Dordet-Frisoni
aIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eveline Sagné
aIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie-Claude Hygonenq
aIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriela Pretre
aIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stéphane Claverol
bCentre de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Pôle Protéomique, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Fernandez
aIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurent Xavier Nouvel
aIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Citti
aIHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Keim
Northern Arizona University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00873-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The discovery of integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) in wall-less mycoplasmas and the demonstration of their role in massive gene flows within and across species have shed new light on the evolution of these minimal bacteria. Of these, the ICE of the ruminant pathogen Mycoplasma agalactiae (ICEA) represents a prototype and belongs to a new clade of the Mutator-like superfamily that has no preferential insertion site and often occurs as multiple chromosomal copies. Here, functional genomics and mating experiments were combined to address ICEA functions and define the minimal ICEA chassis conferring conjugative properties to M. agalactiae. Data further indicated a complex interaction among coresident ICEAs, since the minimal ICEA structure was influenced by the occurrence of additional ICEA copies that can trans-complement conjugation-deficient ICEAs. However, this cooperative behavior was limited to the CDS14 surface lipoprotein, which is constitutively expressed by coresident ICEAs, and did not extend to other ICEA proteins, including the cis-acting DDE recombinase and components of the mating channel whose expression was detected only sporadically. Remarkably, conjugation-deficient mutants containing a single ICEA copy knocked out in cds14 can be complemented by neighboring cells expressing CDS14. This result, together with those revealing the conservation of CDS14 functions in closely related species, may suggest a way for mycoplasma ICEs to extend their interaction outside their chromosomal environment. Overall, this report provides a first model of conjugative transfer in mycoplasmas and offers valuable insights into understanding horizontal gene transfer in this highly adaptive and diverse group of minimal bacteria.

IMPORTANCE Integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) are self-transmissible mobile genetic elements that are key mediators of horizontal gene flow in bacteria. Recently, a new category of ICEs was identified that confer conjugative properties to mycoplasmas, a highly adaptive and diverse group of wall-less bacteria with reduced genomes. Unlike classical ICEs, these mobile elements have no preferential insertion specificity, and multiple mycoplasma ICE copies can be found randomly integrated into the host chromosome. Here, the prototype ICE of Mycoplasma agalactiae was used to define the minimal conjugative machinery and to propose the first model of ICE transfer in mycoplasmas. This model unveils the complex interactions taking place among coresident ICEs and suggests a way for these elements to extend their influence outside their chromosomal environment. These data pave the way for future studies aiming at deciphering chromosomal transfer, an unconventional mechanism of DNA swapping that has been recently associated with mycoplasma ICEs.

INTRODUCTION

Integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) are self-transmissible mobile genetic elements that are key mediators of horizontal gene flow in bacteria (1). These self-transmissible elements encode their excision and transfer by conjugation and integration into the genome of the recipient cell, where they replicate as a part of the host chromosome. Recently, a new family of self-transmissible integrative elements was identified in the genome of several mycoplasma species and confers conjugative properties to this important group of bacteria (2–8).

Mycoplasmas are well known for having some of the smallest genomes thus far characterized in free-living organisms, with many species being successful human and animal pathogens (9, 10). Mycoplasmas belong to the class Mollicutes, a large group of atypical bacteria that have evolved from low-GC, Gram-positive common ancestors (11). For decades, their evolution has been considered to be marked by a degenerative process, with successive losses of genetic material resulting in current mycoplasmas having no cell wall and limited metabolic capacities (9). The recent discovery of massive horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in mycoplasmas has shed new light on the dynamics of their reduced genomes (12, 13). Evidence for HGT in these minimal bacteria came from the identification of putative ICEs in several species together with in silico data suggesting that mycoplasma species of distant phylogenetic groups have exchanged a significant amount of chromosomal DNA (14).

Conjugative properties of mycoplasmas were further demonstrated using the ruminant pathogen Mycoplasma agalactiae as a model organism (7, 12). In this species, mating experiments and associated next-generation sequencing analyses established that mycoplasma ICEs (MICEs) are self-transmissible mobile elements conferring to recipient cells the capacity to conjugate (Fig. 1). These uncovered at the same time an unconventional conjugative mechanism of chromosomal transfers (CTs) which involved large chromosomal regions and were independent of their genomic locations (12). While ICE self-dissemination from ICE-positive to ICE-negative cells was documented, CTs were observed in the opposite direction, resulting in the incorporation of large genomic regions (Fig. 1). Remarkably, CTs can mobilize up to 10% of the mycoplasma genome in a single conjugative event generating complex progeny of chimeric genomes that may resemble conjugative distributive transfers in Mycobacterium smegmatis (15). While ICE and CTs appeared to represent two independent events, CTs most likely rely on ICE factors for providing the conjugative pore.

FIG 1 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1 

ICEA-mediated horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in M. agalactiae. (A) Schematic illustrating the two mechanisms of gene exchanges occurring upon mating experiments involving strain 5632 as ICE donor and strain PG2 as ICE recipient cells (7, 12). One of the three chromosomal ICEA copies of 5632 is transferred to PG2 and integrates randomly in the recipient genome (ICEA transfer). ICEA self-dissemination is associated with a second mechanism of gene exchange that occurs in the opposite direction from the recipient to the donor cells and involves large chromosomal DNA movements (chromosomal transfer). ICEA transfer confers conjugative properties to the PG2 recipient cells (7). (B) The 23 genes identified in ICEA are represented with their respective orientations and approximate nucleotide sizes. The two inverted repeats (IRs) flanking the ICEA are represented by black diamonds. The genes encoding predicted surface lipoproteins and those encoding proteins with putative transmembrane domains are in black and gray, respectively. Hypothetical functions were deduced from putative conserved domains found in several ICEA products (Table S1). ssDNA, single-stranded DNA; T4SS, type IV secretion system.

TABLE S1 

Relevant features of ICEA products. Download TABLE S1, DOCX file, 0.05 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Baranowski et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Among the MICEs described so far, the ICE of M. agalactiae (ICEA) has been most extensively studied (3, 16). ICEA and MICEs in general belong to a new family of self-transmissible integrative elements that rely on a DDE transposase of the prokaryotic Mutator-like family for their mobility (7, 17). Mainly associated with small and simple transposons such as insertion sequences, DDE transposases are also encoded by some more complex mobile elements, such as streptococcal TnGBS conjugative transposons (17). Unlike TnGBS conjugative transposons, which have a preferential insertion location upstream of σA promoters, ICEA integration occurs randomly in the host chromosome, generating a diverse population of ICEA transconjugants (7, 17). This situation also contrasts with the more conventional ICEs, which encode site-specific tyrosine recombinases (1). ICEA occurrence varies among M. agalactiae strains, with strain 5632 containing three nearly identical ICEA copies and strain PG2 containing no ICE or a vestigial form (14, 16). Functional ICEAs are about 27 kb long and are composed of 23 genes (Fig. 1), most of which encode proteins of unknown function (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) with no homologue outside the Mollicutes (3). Among the few exceptions are CDS5 and CDS17, two proteins with similarity to conjugation-related TraG/VirD4 and TraE/VirB4, respectively (Table S1). Both proteins are energetic components of the type IV secretion systems, which are usually involved in DNA transport (18).

The establishment of laboratory conditions in which ICE transfer can be reproduced and analyzed in M. agalactiae (7), together with the development of specific genetic tools for the manipulation of this species (19), offers a unique opportunity to further investigate the detailed mechanisms underlying HGTs in mycoplasmas. In the present study, a transposon-based strategy was devised to knock out individual ICEA genes and to decipher ICEA functions in M. agalactiae. Data showed that the minimal ICEA chassis required for conferring conjugative properties to M. agalactiae was influenced by the occurrence of additional ICEA copies that can trans-complement conjugation-deficient ICEAs. Complementation studies further unveiled the complexity of this interplay, which can even extend to neighboring cells, and the key role played by the coresident ICEA expression pattern. This report is a first step toward understanding HGT in Mollicutes and provides a valuable experimental framework to decipher the mechanisms of DNA exchange in more-complex bacteria associated with this new category of mobile elements.

RESULTS

Conjugative properties of mutated Mycoplasma agalactiae ICEA.To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying ICE conjugative transfer in M. agalactiae, a library of 1,440 individual mutants was generated by random insertion of a minitransposon (mTn) into the genome of strain 5632, which contains three nearly identical copies of a functional ICEA (Fig. 1). Mating experiments were conducted using pools of 96 individual 5632 mutants as donors and a pool of 5 PG2 recipient clones to avoid possible bias associated with a particular variant. Donors and recipients were chosen to carry compatible antibiotic markers (see Materials and Methods), and the resulting transconjugants were obtained with a frequency ranging from 2 × 10−9 to 8 × 10−8 transconjugants/total CFU, as expected for the 1:10 ratio (5632/PG2) that favors ICEA transfer from 5632 to PG2 (7). Doubly resistant colonies were further subjected to detailed genetic analysis to (i) identify ICEA-positive PG2 versus 5632 that had acquired PG2 genomic materials by CTs and (ii) map the mTn position within ICEA-positive PG2 transconjugants. This strategy allowed the identification of 27 unique mutant ICEAs (Fig. 2A; see also Table S2 in the supplemental material). Remarkably, mTn insertions were found to cluster within a 6.4-kb ICEA region spanning cdsE to cdsH, with the exception of three inserted in the noncoding regions ncr1/A and ncr36/22 (Fig. 2A, mutants 3, 5, and 47) and one inserted in cds11 (Fig. 2A, mutant 7).

TABLE S2 

Mutant ICEAs generated in M. agalactiae strain 5632. Download TABLE S2, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Baranowski et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG 2 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2 

Functional analysis of mutant ICEAs in the 5632 and PG2 genetic backgrounds. (A and B) Schematic illustrating the 51 mutant ICEAs generated by transposon mutagenesis in M. agalactiae strain 5632 (B) and the mutant ICEAs selected in PG2 upon mating with 5632 (A). Individual mutant ICEAs are designated according to Table S2. The genes with no mTn insertion are indicated in white. ICEA genes found essential (red) or dispensable (green) were identified according to their genetic backgrounds, which differ with respect to ICEA content (Fig. 1). (C and D) Conjugative properties of selected mutant ICEAs in PG2 (C) and 5632 (D). Mating frequencies were calculated as the number of dually resistant transconjugants per total CFU (mating frequencies per singly resistant CFU are provided in Table S3). Donor cells were mated with a pool of 5 ICEA-negative PG2 clones encoding resistance to puromycin (mating PG2 ICEA × PG2) or tetracycline (mating 5632 × PG2). Dually resistant colonies were selected by using a combination of gentamicin and puromycin (mating PG2 ICEA × PG2) or of gentamicin and tetracycline (mating 5632 × PG2). For PG2 ICEA × PG2 matings (C), the data represent means of results from at least three independent assays, with the exception of mutant ICEA 23 (nine independent assays). Since mutant ICEAs can be found integrated at different genomic positions, two PG2 ICEA transconjugants were used for mutant ICEA 7 (ICEA at genomic positions 395291 and 433901). Standard deviations are indicated by error bars. The asterisk indicates a mating frequency below the detection limit (1 × 10−10 transconjugants per total CFU). For 5632 × PG2 matings (D), the data represent averages of results from two independent assays. The genetic profile of the transconjugants was determined using 10 to 166 dually resistant colonies per mating, which, for lower mating frequencies, represented nearly all the progeny.

TABLE S3 

Mating frequencies per singly resistant CFU. Download TABLE S3, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Baranowski et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Since PG2 transconjugants contain no coresident ICEA copies (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), mating experiments were performed to evaluate the conjugative properties of selected mutant ICEAs (Fig. 2A). Individual PG2 transconjugants (further designated PG2 ICEA) were mated with a pool of five ICEA-negative PG2 clones as recipient cells (Fig. 2C). The PG2 ICEA cells carrying an mTn inserted in ncr1/A, ncr19/E, and ncr36/22 (Fig. 2A and C, mutants 3, 22, 23, and 47) displayed comparable mating frequencies (1.9 × 10−6 to 3.5 × 10−6 transconjugants/total CFU), suggesting that mTn insertions in these regions had no or minimal effect on conjugation. Conversely, mating experiments involving cds14 knockout ICEAs in PG2 (Fig. 2A and C, mutants 28, 31, and 33) confirmed the essential role previously recognized for this gene (7) and further indicated that cds14 can be complemented in trans by coresident ICEA copies, such as in 5632. The insertion of an mTn in cds11, cdsE, cdsF, and cdsH (Fig. 2A and C, mutants 7, 25 to 26, 35 to 36, and 43 to 44) did not abrogate ICEA transfer, but several mutant ICEAs displayed a reduced capacity to self-disseminate. Whether the conjugative properties of these PG2 ICEA cells can be influenced by the chromosomal position of the integrated ICEA is unknown. However, similar mating frequencies (4 × 10−8 to 5 × 10−8 transconjugants/total CFU) were observed for two PG2 transconjugants sharing the same mutant ICEA (Fig. 2C, mutant 7) integrated at different chromosomal sites (genomic positions 395291 and 433901). These results identified cdsE, cdsF, cdsH, and, to a lesser extent, cds11 as dispensable for ICEA self-dissemination.

FIG S1 

PG2 ICEA cells harbor a single ICEA copy randomly integrated into the host chromosome. Southern blotting experiments (E. Dordet-Frisoni, M. S. Marenda, E. Sagné, L. X. Nouvel, R. Guérillot, P. Glaser, A. Blanchard, F. Tardy, P. Sirand-Pugnet, E. Baranowski, and C. Citti, Mol Microbiol 89:1226–1239, 2013, doi:10.1111/mmi.12341) performed with PG2 ICEA transconjugants failed to reveal multiple ICEA integrations. (A and B) Mycoplasma genomic DNAs were restricted with EcoRV and hybridized with mTn gentamicin (Gm)-specific (A) or ICEA cds22-specific (B) probes. The identification of a single Gm-positive DNA fragment in PG2 ICEA transconjugants was in agreement with genomic DNA sequencing data indicating a single mutant ICEA insertion in the PG2 chromosome. This result was further supported by the results of DNA hybridization with the cds22-specific probe that also discarded any wild-type ICEA copy in PG2 ICEA transconjugants. Differences in size between cds22-positive DNA fragments are consistent with the random insertion of ICEA in the host chromosome. The digested ICEA circular form is indicated by an arrow. (C) For each of the PG2 ICEA transconjugants, the size of the Gm-positive DNA fragments was in agreement with predicted values. The number in parenthesis indicates the size of the ICEA fragment with an inserted mTn. The Gm- and cds22-positive fragments are indicated by asterisks (*, Gm-specific probe; **, cds22-specific probe). Dashed lines indicate a fragment overlapping ICEA and genomic DNA. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 2.1 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Baranowski et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The minimal ICE chassis that confers conjugative properties to Mycoplasma agalactiae.As shown above, mutant ICEs recovered in PG2 transconjugants displayed a biased distribution of their mTn insertions (Fig. 2A). This raised the issue of the representativeness of the 5632 library, and thus a PCR-based screening strategy for the direct identification of mutant ICEAs in 5632 was developed: mTn insertions across the entire ICEA were searched by a series of PCR assays using one primer matching each end of the mTn and one specific-ICEA primer selected from a set of oligonucleotides spanning the whole ICEA region. Amplifications were performed using pools of 96 individual mutants until one mTn insertion event per gene was detected, and positive pools were further characterized down to the single-mutant level. For each mutant, the mTn insertion was mapped by genomic DNA sequencing, which also confirmed the presence of a single mTn per chromosome. Finally, the distribution of mTn insertions among the three ICEA copies of 5632 was determined by long-range PCR amplifications using mTn-specific primers and a panel of oligonucleotides that are complementary to genomic DNA regions surrounding each ICEA copy. This strategy led us to identify 35 unique mutants (Table S2) among the three ICEA copies of 5632 (ICEA-I [29%], ICEA-II [37%], and ICEA-III [34%]). This time, mTn insertions were found broadly distributed throughout the ICEA locus with the exception of several genes (cds12, cdsB, cdsD, cds13, cds27, and cds36), all characterized by small sizes ranging from 0.20 to 0.65 kb. These findings indicate that the particular set of mutant ICEAs selected in PG2 as described above cannot be explained simply by the poor representativeness of the 5632 mutant library.

The 51 mutant ICEAs identified in 5632, either by PCR screening or by mating experiments, are illustrated in Fig. 2B. Of 35 mutant ICEAs identified by PCR, 24 did not correspond to detectable PG2 transconjugants previously obtained (compare Fig. 2A and B), suggesting that these mutant ICEAs have lost their capacity to disseminate from 5632 to PG2. This was confirmed by mating performed using each of these 5632 mutants individually as an ICEA donor (Fig. 2D) and by further analyses of their progeny. Results showed that when transconjugants were obtained, all displayed the 5632 genomic backbone of the mutant and corresponded to 5632 having acquired the second PG2 antibiotic marker upon CT. This was true for all except 5632 mutant 23 (mTn inserted in ncr19/E with no influence on conjugation), which was used as a positive control for ICEA transfer and which generated up to 97% PG2 transconjugants (Fig. 2D, mutant 23).

Overall, these results indicate that ICEA transfer can be abrogated or strongly affected by disrupting the genes encoding CDS1, CDSA, CDSC, CDS5, CDS7, CDS15, CDS16, CDS17, CDS19, CDS30, CDSG, and CDS22 in 5632 (Fig. 2B). Unlike the results seen with cds14 knockout ICEAs, the conjugative properties of these mutant ICEAs cannot be restored by coresident ICEA copies. Finally, ICEA transfer was also abrogated by mTn insertion in ncrD/5 and ncr16/27 (Fig. 2B, mutants 10 and 18), raising questions about the presence of regulatory and/or cis-acting elements (e.g., oriT) in these regions. Whether short genes (<0.65 kb) with no mTn insertion may encode essential functions remains to be further investigated.

ICEA transfer in Mycoplasma agalactiae requires the CDS14 surface lipoprotein.The CDS14 lipoprotein is essential for mycoplasma conjugation and contains a 27-amino-acid (aa) signal sequence (Fig. S2) that is characteristic of surface-exposed lipoproteins in M. agalactiae. The CDS14 surface location was confirmed in ICEA-positive cells by colony blotting assays using a specific antiserum (Fig. 3A), and the results are in agreement with proteomic data showing an association of CDS14 with the Triton X-114 hydrophobic fraction obtained after mycoplasma partitioning (16). Western blot analyses of 5632[ICEA cds14::mTn]G28 (mutant 28 in Fig. 2B; see also Table S2), which has one of the three ICEA copies with a knockout cds14, further demonstrated that this lipoprotein can be expressed by coresident ICEAs (Fig. 3B). This explains the capacity of cds14 knockout ICEAs to be horizontally transferred from the 5632 cells as described above.

FIG S2 

Global alignment of CDS14 lipoproteins found in ICEs of M. agalactiae strain 5632 (5632) and M. bovis strain PG45 (PG45). The alignments of CDS14 lipoprotein sequences derived from 5632 (MAGa5010) and PG45 (MBOVPG45_0187) were performed by using Needleman-Wunsch global alignment. The 27-aa sequence characteristic of surface-exposed lipoproteins is underlined. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 2.8 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Baranowski et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG 3 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3 

Protein expression of PG2-ICEA mutants. (A) Immunostaining of M. agalactiae colonies showing CDS14 lipoprotein expression at the surface of 5632 cells. Colony blotting was carried out by using a specific serum (anti-CDS14), and ICEA-negative PG2 cells (PG2) were used as a negative control. (B) Western blot analysis of CDS14 lipoprotein expression in 5632 and PG2 ICEA cells. CDS14 lipoprotein expression in strain 5632 containing three chromosomal ICEA copies (lane 1) was not abrogated in a 5632 mutant harboring a cds14 knockout ICEA copy (lane 2). CDS14 lipoprotein expression was detectable in PG2 transconjugants that had acquired a mutant ICEA harboring an mTn inserted in ncr19/E (lane 4) but not in strain PG2 (lane 3) or in PG2 transconjugants harboring a cds14 knockout ICEA (lane 5). Transformation of PG2 transconjugants harboring a cds14 knockout ICEA with a plasmid expressing CDS14 restored the expression of the lipoprotein (lane 6). A specific serum raised against lipoprotein P80 was used as a control (P80). (C) Schematic illustrating the protein expression profiles of selected mutant ICEAs in PG2 cells. Mutant ICEAs are identified according to Table S2, and ICEA products detected by proteomics (Table S4) are indicated (closed arrows).

TABLE S4 

Proteomic analysis of PG2 ICEA mutants. Download TABLE S4, DOCX file, 0.05 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Baranowski et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The role of the CDS14 lipoprotein was further investigated by using conjugation-deficient PG2E[ICEA cds14::mTn]G28, which has only one ICEA copy with an mTn inserted in cds14. Complementation studies confirmed that the conjugative properties of this mutant can be restored upon transformation with plasmid pO/T-CDS14, which expresses the wild-type CDS14, but not with the empty vector (Table 1, matings A and B). Remarkably, transformation of ICE-negative recipient cells with pO/T-CDS14 also restored the conjugative properties of PG2E[ICEA cds14::mTn]G28 (Table 1, mating C) with only a (ca. 20-fold) reduction in mating frequency. This result provides the first evidence of ICE complementation by neighboring cells and suggests that CDS14 lipoprotein may initiate ICEA transfer in M. agalactiae by promoting a contact between the donor cells and the recipient cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1 

Complementation studies with cds14, cds5, and cds22 knockout ICEAs

Interestingly, global alignment of CDS14 lipoprotein with its homologue in ICEB, the conjugative element occurring in the closely related M. bovis species, revealed 86.9% sequence similarity (Fig. S2). To test whether these differences might influence the conjugative transfer of ICEA in M. agalactiae, PG2E[ICEA cds14::mTn]G28 was transformed with plasmid pO/T-CDS14bov expressing the ICEB CDS14 lipoprotein. This plasmid was able to restore the conjugative properties of cds14 knockout ICEA with a 2-fold reduction in mating frequency (Table 1, mating D). This suggests that one of the CDS14 functions is conserved between ICEA and ICEB.

Taken together, these results unveiled the critical role played by ICE-encoded surface lipoproteins in the exchange of genetic information within mycoplasma species and most likely across species.

CDS5 expression from coresident ICEAs is a key factor for cds5 knockout ICEA complementation.In contrast to the cds14 mutants that can be complemented by coresident ICEAs, or even by neighboring cells expressing CDS14, a large number of mutant ICEAs were unable to disseminate from 5632 to PG2 (Fig. 2; see also Table S2). Several of these mutant ICEAs were knocked out in genes whose products were not detected by proteomics (see below), raising the issue of whether the level of gene expression in coresident ICEAs can influence their cooperative behavior. To address this issue, complementation studies were performed using plasmid DNA constructs expressing CDS5.

While cds5 knockout ICEAs have been shown to lose their capacity to disseminate from 5632 to PG2 (Fig. 2D, mutants 11 and 12), mating of 5632 complemented with cds5 (plasmid pO/T-CDS5) with ICEA-negative PG2 recipient cells resulted in a ca. 10-fold increase in mating frequency (Table 1, matings E and G). Analysis of the mating progeny revealed that 64% to 78% of these transconjugants displayed a PG2 genomic profile, indicating conjugative transfer of the cds5 knockout ICEA from 5632 to PG2. Transformation with the empty vector (plasmid pO/T) as a negative control resulted in no detectable event of transfer (Table 1, matings F and H). These data showed that cds5 knockout ICEAs can be complemented in trans, at least partially, when cds5 is expressed from the expression vector, while, paradoxically, coresident ICEAs were unable to restore the conjugative properties of cds5 knockout ICEAs. Finally, these complementation studies allowed us to rule out any lethal effect resulting from integration of cds5 knockout ICEAs in the PG2 chromosome.

The CDS5 is a putative membrane-bound hexamer with ATPase activity displaying some similarity to the TraG/VirD4 conjugative channel component found in the more classical bacteria (3). The formation of a hexameric structure by cds5 products remains to be confirmed, but this multimeric organization may provide an alternative scenario for the inactive cds5 knockout ICEAs in 5632. Indeed, mTn insertion in cds5 could lead to the expression of truncated products interfering with the hexamer complex formation and thus inducing a dominant-negative effect on coresident ICEAs. To address this issue, truncated versions of cds5 were cloned into the pO/T expression vector, leading to plasmids pO/T-CDS5N1, pO/T-CDS5N2, pO/T-CDS5C1, and pO/T-CDS5C2, expressing, respectively, CDS5 N- and C-terminal regions resulting from mTn insertion in cds5 mutants 11 and 12 (Fig. S3). Transformation of 5632[ICEA ncr19/E::mTn]G23 (mTn inserted in ncr19/E with no influence on conjugation) with constructions carrying truncated forms of cds5, the full-length cds5, or the empty vector had no influence on mating efficacy (Table 1, matings I to N), indicating that the expression of CDS5 truncated products did not inhibit ICEA transfer and that the conjugation-deficient phenotype of cds5 knockout mutants was not the result of a dominant-negative effect.

FIG S3 

Plasmid constructions carrying cds5 or truncated versions of cds5. Schematics illustrate plasmid constructions carrying full-length cds5 (pO/T-CDS5) or truncated versions of cds5 (pO/T-CDS5 N1, C1, N2, and C2). The truncated sequences are CDS5 N- and C-terminal regions resulting from mTn insertion in 5632[ICEA cds5::mTn]G11 and 5632[ICEA cds5::mTn]G12 (Fig. 2B; see also Table S2). Coding sequences were cloned downstream of the M. agalactiae lipoprotein P40 gene (MAG2410) promoter region (arrow). Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.2 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Baranowski et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

CDS22 expression is unable to trans-complement cds22 knockout ICEAs.A second series of complementation studies were performed with the cds22 knockout ICEA mutant 5632[ICEA cds22::mTn]G50. That gene encodes a DDE recombinase that was previously shown to mediate ICEA excision and circularization (7). Transformation with pO/T-CDS22 did not increase mating frequency compared to the level seen with empty vector, and no PG2 transconjugants were identified upon analysis of the mating progeny (Table 1, matings O and P). Transformation of 5632[ICEA ncr19/E::mTn]G23 (mTn inserted in ncr19/E with no influence on conjugation) with pO/T-CDS22 or the empty vector had no or minimal influence on the mating frequencies (Table 1, matings Q and M). These results suggest that the cds22 knockout ICEA cannot be complemented in trans either by coresident ICEAs or by a CDS22-expressing plasmid. This result is consistent with the longstanding observation that DDE transposases show a cis preference for their activities (20–22).

Taken together, these results illustrate the complex interactions taking place among coresident ICEAs in 5632 and elucidate some of the mechanisms underlying their noncooperative behavior.

Protein expression profiles of PG2-ICEA mutants.A previous study showed that three ICEA products in 5632, namely, CDS14 and, to a lesser extent, CDS17 and CDS30, are detectable by proteomic analysis under laboratory conditions (16). To further characterize ICEA expression in different genomic contexts, a proteomic analysis was conducted using a set of PG2 transconjugants that had acquired a mutated ICEA copy from 5632 (Fig. 3C; see also Table S4). Data revealed that up to 9 ICEA products, namely, CDSC, CDSD, CDS7, CDS15, CDS19, CDSE, CDS14, CDSF, and CDS30, were detected in PG2T[ICEA ncr19/E::mTn]G23 (mTn inserted in ncr19/E with no influence on conjugation). CDS17 was also detected in PG2T[ICEA ncr19/E::mTn]G23 but at levels below the cutoff value. CDSE, CDS14, and CDSF were not detected in PG2T[ICEA cdsE::mTn]G25, PG2T[ICEA cds14::mTn]G28, or PG2T[ICEA cdsF::mTn]G35, in all of which the corresponding genes are disrupted. Besides confirming the disruption of these genes, these data also indicate that mTn insertion in cdsE has no polar effect on the expression of the downstream cds14 gene.

Interestingly, the data suggested that some ICEA loci might be downregulated to undetectable levels in the conjugation-deficient PG2T[ICEA cds14::mTn]G28 mutant. These corresponded to CDSC, CDSD, CDS7, and CDS19 detected in other mutants, whose genes are located upstream of cds14. Overall, the PG2 ICEA mutants that were tested here and disrupted in identified coding genes, versus ncr19/E, had a simplified ICEA protein expression profile.

DISCUSSION

Since their discovery in mycoplasma species of the hominis phylogenetic group, MICEs have been found broadly distributed across the members of Mollicutes (2–6, 8) and their pivotal role in HGTs is emerging (7, 12, 13). Taking advantage of the M. agalactiae ICE prototype, this report provides the first functional analysis of MICE factors involved in conjugative transfer. Because MICEs, such as ICEA, are often found in multiple copies, this report points toward their complex interplay in the mycoplasma host environment.

The functional ICEA backbone.The minimal ICEA chassis conferring conjugative properties to M. agalactiae was identified by random transposon mutagenesis. Of the 23 genes reported in ICEA, 17 were found to be disrupted by the insertion of an mTn and 13 were found essential for self-dissemination, since a single mTn insertion in any of these regions abrogated the conjugative properties of M. agalactiae. These data point toward the minimal ICEA machinery being composed of (i) a cluster of 7 proteins with predicted transmembrane domains that most likely represents a module associated with the conjugative channel (CDS5 to CDS19), (ii) a surface-exposed lipoprotein (CDS14), (iii) a putative partitioning protein (CDSG), (iv) a DDE transposase (CDS22), and (v) several other proteins with no predicted function (CDS1, CDSA, CDSC, and CDS30). The conjugation-deficient phenotype of the ICEA mutants is unlikely to be the result of a polar effect since (i) mTn insertions were identified in close proximity to essential ICEA regions with no influence on conjugation (cds1, cds14, cds30, and, to a lesser extent, cdsA and cdsG); (ii) cds14 knockout ICEAs can be complemented in trans; (iii) ICEA mutants that have the putative channel module disrupted by an mTn inserted in cds5 can be plasmid complemented; and (iv) mTn insertions in the cdsE-cdsH region have no influence on protein expression from surrounding genes. Whether additional essential ICEA functions may be encoded by several of the 6 short genes (0.20 to 0.65 kb) with no mTn insertion remains to be further investigated.

The minimal ICEA chassis was consistent with the conservation of cds5, cds17, cds19, and cds22 across documented ICEs of ruminant mycoplasma species (8) and with the occurrence of cds1, cds14, and cds16 at very similar locations in a majority of MICEs (2, 4–6, 23). Interestingly, the conjugative properties of M. agalactiae were also abrogated by mTn insertion in NCRs, raising questions regarding the presence of regulatory elements and/or key motifs, such as an oriT, in these regions. The identification of the occurrence of such sequences in the NCR1/A (1,238 nucleotides) is supported by the identification of a hairpin motif (TGGCTCAT-N5-ATGAGCCA) at positions 2046 to 2066 (S. Torres-Puig, personal communication). Whether mTn insertion in NCRs may influence the expression surrounding ICEA regions is unknown.

Accessory ICEA functions were found associated with only 4 genes, namely, cds11, cdsE, cdsF, and cdsH. These accessory functions are all encoded by genes within a 6.4-kb ICEA region spanning cdsE to cdsH, with the exception of cds11, which belongs to a cluster of 6 genes (cdsA to cdsD) located upstream from the putative channel module (Fig. 1). Although dispensable, an important reduction of the mating frequency was observed for several mutants with an mTn inserted in these ICEA regions (Fig. 2C). For PG2T[ICEA cds11::mTn]G7 (Fig. 2A, mutant 7), this reduction was not influenced by the position of the mutant ICEA in the PG2 chromosome. Finally, BLASTP analyses with CDSE revealed significant (≥90%) similarity to a putative prophage gene product found in the chromosomes of PG2 (MAG6440) and 5632 (MAGa7400). The presence of this chromosomal cdsE homologue is puzzling, and its role in ICEA transfer remains to be confirmed.

A minimal genome able to cope with multiple ICEA copies.Unlike classical ICEs, ICEA has no preferential insertion specificity and multiple copies can be found at different loci of the host chromosome. This raised questions regarding their maintenance in the small mycoplasma genomes and the deleterious effect that can be associated with their random insertion, in particular, because they were found within coding sequences (7, 16). Whether ICEA may confer any advantage in vivo is unknown, but PG2 ICEA transconjugants displayed reduced fitness under laboratory conditions (unpublished data). Many bacterial ICEs and some prokaryotic transposable elements carry cargo genes implicated in accessory functions, such as antibiotic resistance, which confer a selective advantage to their host (1). Such cargo genes have never been reported in MICEs, but ICE-mediated CTs likely contribute to the acquisition of new phenotypic traits upon chromosomal exchanges.

Backup functions associated with coresident ICEAs.Our data suggest that coresident ICEAs are able to cooperate by complementing essential functions in mutant ICEAs. This was shown by using cds14 knockout ICEAs, which can self-disseminate in the context of strain 5632 but not in the context of PG2, which contains no additional ICEA copy. The complementation of cds14 by coresident ICEAs was further confirmed by the constitutive expression of the CDS14 lipoprotein in 5632 mutants with 1 of the 3 ICEA copies knocked out in cds14 but not in PG2 cells that had acquired a cds14 knockout ICEA. Remarkably, this cooperative behavior was found to extend to neighboring cells, since transformants of ICEA-negative cells containing a plasmid vector expressing CDS14 were able to complement cds14 knockout ICEAs in neighboring cells. Besides providing the first example of ICE complementation by neighboring cells, this result has deep implications for the dissemination of MICEs within and across mycoplasma species. This idea was further supported by complementation studies showing that the CDS14 lipoprotein in M. agalactiae can be substituted by its homologue in M. bovis ICEB and by the results of our previous study showing ICEA-mediated CTs between M. agalactiae and M. bovis (12).

Interestingly, the cooperative behavior documented with cds14 knockout ICEAs did not extend to other critical ICEA regions. Complementation studies with cds22 knockout ICEAs confirmed that several critical ICEA functions can be associated with cis-acting elements that cannot be complemented by coresident ICEAs. However, studies with cds5 mutant ICEAs suggested that interactions among coresident ICEAs can be more complex. Indeed, cds5 knockout ICEAs can be trans-complemented upon transformation with a CDS5-expressing plasmid but not by coresident ICEAs. Since ICEA transfer from 5632 to PG2 occurs at only a low frequency, ICEA activation is expected to be a rare event. It is thus reasonable to speculate that only one of the three chromosomal ICEA copies in 5632 can be stochastically activated. This hypothesis provides a simple scenario to explain the lack of complementation of cds5 mutants by coresident ICEAs, since this component of the mating channel is expected to be expressed only upon ICEA activation. It is further supported by proteomic analysis showing a simplified ICEA protein expression profile that contrasted with the constitutive expression of the CDS14 surface lipoprotein.

Conclusions.The results generated in the present study were combined with current knowledge to propose the first working model of horizontal ICE dissemination in mycoplasmas, including cooperation among coresident ICEs (Fig. 4). These data, together with the large collection of ICEA mutants generated in this study, pave the way for future studies aiming at deciphering ICE-mediated CTs within and among mycoplasma species. These simple organisms also provide a valuable experimental frame to decipher the mechanisms of DNA exchange in more-complex bacteria in association with this new category of mobile elements.

FIG 4 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4 

Overview of conjugative ICE transfer in M. agalactiae. This schematic illustrates the 5 key steps in ICEA transfer based on current knowledge in other bacteria (1, 18). Under normal conditions, ICEA copies are found integrated into the host chromosome and most ICEA genes are not expressed. Among the few proteins expressed by chromosomal ICEAs is the CDS14 lipoprotein, which is surface exposed and plays a critical role in initiating the conjugative process (step 1). When ICEA gene expression is induced, under specific cellular conditions or stochastically, the cis-acting DDE transposase is produced and one of the three ICEA copies excises from the chromosome and forms a circular double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) molecule (step 2). ICEA circularization induces the expression of the conjugative module, whose products assemble into the mating pore, a simplified form of type IV secretion system (T4SS) found in more-complex bacteria (step 3). A protein complex known as a relaxosome recognizes the origin of transfer (oriT) on the circular ICEA, and a relaxase generates a linear single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) by nicking the ICEA DNA (step 4). Finally, the relaxosome complex interacts with the TraG-like (VirD4 homologue) energetic component found at the inner side of the membrane that facilitates the transfer of the ssDNA bound to the relaxase through the mating channel (step 5). Once in the recipient strain, the ICEA recircularizes, becomes doubly stranded, and integrates randomly into the host chromosome. The minimal functional ICEA encompasses 80% of the coding sequence and includes a gene cluster (cds5 to cds19, encoding proteins with transmembrane domains) that most likely represents a module associated with the conjugative channel. Additional essential ICEA determinants included the CDS14 surface lipoprotein, the CDSG putative partitioning protein, and the DDE transposase (CDS22), together with several proteins of unknown function (CDS1, CDSA, CDSC, and CDS30).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mycoplasmas and culture conditions.M. agalactiae strains PG2 and 5632 have been previously described (14, 16), and the sequence of each genome is available in databases (GenBank accession numbers CU179680.1 and FP671138.1, respectively). These two strains differ in their ICE content, with strain 5632 having three almost identical chromosomal copies of ICEA (ICEA-I, ICEA-II, and ICEA-III), while strain PG2 contains only a severely degenerated, vestigial ICE (14, 16). M. agalactiae was grown at 37°C in SP4 medium supplemented with 500 µg/ml cephalexin (Virbac). When needed, gentamicin (50 µg/ml), tetracycline (2 µg/ml), and puromycin (10 µg/ml), alone or in combination, were added to the medium. Due to their small cell size and colony size, growth of mycoplasmas cannot be monitored by optical density. Mycoplasma titers were thus determined based on colony counts on solid media after 4 to 7 days of incubation at 37°C performed by the use of a binocular stereoscopic microscope (19).

Transposon mutagenesis and genetic tagging of mycoplasmas with antibiotic markers.A similar approach was used for transposon mutagenesis and genetic tagging of M. agalactiae. Selective antibiotic markers were introduced randomly in the mycoplasma genome as previously described by transforming mycoplasma cultures with plasmid pMT85 or its derivatives (7, 19, 24). The pMT85 carries a minitransposon (mTn) derived from the Tn4001 gentamicin resistance transposon. The transposase gene (tnpA) is located outside the mTn to prevent re-excision events once it is inserted in the host chromosome (19). Two derivatives, pMT85-Tet and pMT85-Pur, were constructed as previously described by replacing the gentamicin resistance gene with a tetracycline resistance marker and a puromycin resistance marker, respectively (7).

PCR-based screening of mycoplasma mutant library.A set of 19 oligonucleotides spanning the whole ICEA region (see Table S5 in the supplemental material) was used to develop a PCR-based screening of the mutant library and to identify 5632 mutants with an mTn inserted within ICEA regions. Each ICEA-specific primer was used in combination with the SG5 transposon-specific oligonucleotide priming at both inverted repeats (IRs) that define the extremities of the integrated transposon (Table S5). PCR amplifications were performed according to the recommendations of the Taq DNA polymerase supplier (New England Biolabs). For each mutant, the position of the mTn insertion in the M. agalactiae chromosome was determined by sequencing the junction between M. agalactiae genomic DNA and the 5′ end or 3′ end of the transposon using oligonucleotides SG6_3pMT85E (specific to the 5′ end of the gentamicin-tagged version of the mTn), SG9pMM21-7mod (specific to the 5′ end of the tetracycline-tagged version of the mTn), and EB8 (specific to the 3′ end of all mTn constructions) as primers (Table S5). Genomic DNA sequencing was performed at the GeT-Purpan genomic platform (Toulouse, France). The distribution of mTn insertions among the three ICEA copies was determined by long-range PCR amplifications (Expand long-template PCR system; Roche Life Sciences) using mTn-specific primers and a panel of oligonucleotides corresponding to genomic DNA regions surrounding each ICEA locus (Table S5).

TABLE S5 

Oligonucleotides used in the present study. Download TABLE S5, XLSX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Baranowski et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Mycoplasma mating experiments and genetic characterization of transconjugant progenies.Mating experiments were conducted as described previously by coincubation of ICE-positive and ICE-negative cells (7). Mycoplasma growth may considerably vary from batch to batch using the rich SP4 medium, which contains serum and yeast extract. To reduce potential bias in the comparisons of the mating frequencies observed between experiments, a single batch of medium was used in this study. Cultures of donor and recipient mycoplasmas (109 CFU) were mixed in a 1:1 ratio (matings PG2 ICEA × PG2) or a 1:10 ratio (matings 5632 × PG2) to increase the chances of recovering PG2 ICEA transconjugants. The mating frequency was calculated by dividing the number of doubly resistant colonies obtained on selective solid media by the number of mycoplasma colonies obtained on nonselective media. M. agalactiae transconjugants were characterized by PCR amplification using genomic DNA prepared from individual colonies (7). The presence of antibiotic resistance genes and ICEA in transconjugants was confirmed by using specific oligonucleotides (Table S5). The nature of the genetic backbone was addressed by using a set of primer pairs that covers the M. agalactiae genome and produces PCR fragments specific to 5632 or PG2 (Table S5), as previously described (7, 12).

DNA constructs for protein expression in mycoplasmas.Protein expression in M. agalactiae was performed as previously described by using plasmid p20-1miniO/T (designated "pO/T" in the present study) (19, 25). Briefly, mycoplasma coding sequences were cloned downstream of the lipoprotein P40 gene (MAG2410) promoter region. These two regions were assembled by PCR amplification using overlapping primers (Table S5). The resulting PCR product was cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega) before subcloning at the NotI site of the pO/T was performed. PCRs were performed using Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). DNA constructions were verified by DNA sequencing and introduced in M. agalactiae by transformation, as previously described (19).

Proteomic analyses and immunodetection of ICEA products.M. agalactiae grown under normal and mating growth conditions was subjected to proteomic analyses. Cells were collected by centrifugation of mycoplasma cultures (8,000 × g), washed, and resuspended in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS). Proteins were separated by one-dimensional (1D) SDS-PAGE, and gel sections were subjected to trypsin digestion. Peptides were further analyzed by nano liquid chromatography coupled to a nanospray Q-Exactive hybrid quadruplole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were identified as previously described by using a database consisting of M. agalactiae strain 5632 entries (26). ICEA products were detected by specific antiserums on Western and colony blots (25, 27). Triton-X114-soluble proteins were extracted from M. agalactiae as previously described (28). The anti-CDS14 lipoprotein rabbit serum was produced by animal immunization with a recombinant CDS14 protein (pMAL protein fusion and purification system; New England Biolabs). A sheep serum raised against the M. agalactiae P80 surface antigen was used as a control (25). Western and colony blotting was developed by using swine anti-rabbit or rabbit anti-sheep immunoglobulin G conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (DAKO) and 4-chloro-naphthol substrate or SuperSignal West Dura extended-duration substrate (Thermo Scientific).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Richard Herrmann and Sebastien Guiral for providing pMT85 and pMT85-Tet plasmid constructions. We also thank Philippe Giammarinaro for his help in producing the anti-P80 sheep serum, as well as Emilie Houssin and Abdel Touré for excellent technical assistance. Finally, we also thank Oscar Q. Pich and Sergi Torres-Puig for helpful discussions.

This work was supported by grant ANR09MIE016 (MycXgene) from the French national funding research agency (ANR) and by financial support from INRA and ENVT.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 23 April 2018
    • Accepted 13 June 2018
    • Published 3 July 2018
  • Copyright © 2018 Baranowski et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Johnson CM,
    2. Grossman AD
    . 2015. Integrative and Conjugative Elements (ICEs): what they do and how they work. Annu Rev Genet 49:577–601. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-055018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Calcutt MJ,
    2. Lewis MS,
    3. Wise KS
    . 2002. Molecular genetic analysis of ICEF, an integrative conjugal element that is present as a repetitive sequence in the chromosome of Mycoplasma fermentans PG18. J Bacteriol 184:6929–6941. doi:10.1128/JB.184.24.6929-6941.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Marenda M,
    2. Barbe V,
    3. Gourgues G,
    4. Mangenot S,
    5. Sagne E,
    6. Citti C
    . 2006. A new integrative conjugative element occurs in Mycoplasma agalactiae as chromosomal and free circular forms. J Bacteriol 188:4137–4141. doi:10.1128/JB.00114-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Pinto PM,
    2. Carvalho MOd,
    3. Alves-Junior L,
    4. Brocchi M,
    5. Schrank IS
    . 2007. Molecular analysis of an integrative conjugative element, ICEH, present in the chromosome of different strains of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Genet Mol Biol 30:256–263. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572007000200014.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wise KS,
    2. Calcutt MJ,
    3. Foecking MF,
    4. Röske K,
    5. Madupu R,
    6. Methé BA
    . 2011. Complete genome sequence of Mycoplasma bovis type strain PG45 (ATCC 25523). Infect Immun 79:982–983. doi:10.1128/IAI.00726-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Thiaucourt F,
    2. Manso-Silvan L,
    3. Salah W,
    4. Barbe V,
    5. Vacherie B,
    6. Jacob D,
    7. Breton M,
    8. Dupuy V,
    9. Lomenech AM,
    10. Blanchard A,
    11. Sirand-Pugnet P
    . 2011. Mycoplasma mycoides, from “mycoides Small Colony” to “capri”. A microevolutionary perspective. BMC Genomics 12:114. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Dordet-Frisoni E,
    2. Marenda MS,
    3. Sagné E,
    4. Nouvel LX,
    5. Guérillot R,
    6. Glaser P,
    7. Blanchard A,
    8. Tardy F,
    9. Sirand-Pugnet P,
    10. Baranowski E,
    11. Citti C
    . 2013. ICEA of Mycoplasma agalactiae: a new family of self-transmissible integrative elements that confers conjugative properties to the recipient strain. Mol Microbiol 89:1226–1239. doi:10.1111/mmi.12341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tardy F,
    2. Mick V,
    3. Dordet-Frisoni E,
    4. Marenda M,
    5. Sirand-Pugnet P,
    6. Blanchard A,
    7. Citti C
    . 2015. Integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) are widespread in field isolates of Mycoplasma species pathogenic for ruminants. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1634–1643. doi:10.1128/AEM.03723-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Razin S,
    2. Yogev D,
    3. Naot Y
    . 1998. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:1094–1156.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Citti C,
    2. Blanchard A
    . 2013. Mycoplasmas and their host: emerging and re-emerging minimal pathogens. Trends Microbiol 21:196–203. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2013.01.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Woese CR,
    2. Maniloff J,
    3. Zablen LB
    . 1980. Phylogenetic analysis of the mycoplasmas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77:494–498. doi:10.1073/pnas.77.1.494.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Dordet-Frisoni E,
    2. Sagné E,
    3. Baranowski E,
    4. Breton M,
    5. Nouvel LX,
    6. Blanchard A,
    7. Marenda MS,
    8. Tardy F,
    9. Sirand-Pugnet P,
    10. Citti C
    . 2014. Chromosomal transfers in mycoplasmas: when minimal genomes go mobile. mBio 5:e01958-14. doi:10.1128/mBio.01958-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Citti C,
    2. Dordet-Frisoni E,
    3. Nouvel LX,
    4. Kuo CH,
    5. Baranowski E
    . 2018. Horizontal gene transfers in mycoplasmas (Mollicutes). Curr Issues Mol Biol 29:3–22. doi:10.21775/cimb.029.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sirand-Pugnet P,
    2. Lartigue C,
    3. Marenda M,
    4. Jacob D,
    5. Barré A,
    6. Barbe V,
    7. Schenowitz C,
    8. Mangenot S,
    9. Couloux A,
    10. Segurens B,
    11. de Daruvar A,
    12. Blanchard A,
    13. Citti C
    . 2007. Being pathogenic, plastic, and sexual while living with a nearly minimal bacterial genome. PLoS Genet 3:e75. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030075.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gray TA,
    2. Krywy JA,
    3. Harold J,
    4. Palumbo MJ,
    5. Derbyshire KM
    . 2013. Distributive conjugal transfer in mycobacteria generates progeny with meiotic-like genome-wide mosaicism, allowing mapping of a mating identity locus. PLoS Biol 11:e1001602. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Nouvel LX,
    2. Sirand-Pugnet P,
    3. Marenda MS,
    4. Sagné E,
    5. Barbe V,
    6. Mangenot S,
    7. Schenowitz C,
    8. Jacob D,
    9. Barré A,
    10. Claverol S,
    11. Blanchard A,
    12. Citti C
    . 2010. Comparative genomic and proteomic analyses of two Mycoplasma agalactiae strains: clues to the macro- and micro-events that are shaping mycoplasma diversity. BMC Genomics 11:86. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Guérillot R,
    2. Siguier P,
    3. Gourbeyre E,
    4. Chandler M,
    5. Glaser P
    . 2014. The diversity of prokaryotic DDE transposases of the mutator superfamily, insertion specificity, and association with conjugation machineries. Genome Biol Evol 6:260–272. doi:10.1093/gbe/evu010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Alvarez-Martinez CE,
    2. Christie PJ
    . 2009. Biological diversity of prokaryotic type IV secretion systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73:775–808. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00023-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Baranowski E,
    2. Guiral S,
    3. Sagné E,
    4. Skapski A,
    5. Citti C
    . 2010. Critical role of dispensable genes in Mycoplasma agalactiae interaction with mammalian cells. Infect Immun 78:1542–1551. doi:10.1128/IAI.01195-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Nagy Z,
    2. Chandler M
    . 2004. Regulation of transposition in bacteria. Res Microbiol 155:387–398. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2004.01.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chandler M,
    2. Fayet O,
    3. Rousseau P,
    4. Ton Hoang B,
    5. Duval-Valentin G
    . 2015. Copy-out-paste-in transposition of IS911: a major transposition pathway. Microbiol Spectr 3:MDNA3-0031-2014. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0031-2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Duval-Valentin G,
    2. Chandler M
    . 2011. Cotranslational control of DNA transposition: a window of opportunity. Mol Cell 44:989–996. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.027.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Shu HW,
    2. Liu TT,
    3. Chan HI,
    4. Liu YM,
    5. Wu KM,
    6. Shu HY,
    7. Tsai SF,
    8. Hsiao KJ,
    9. Hu WS,
    10. Ng WV
    . 2012. Complexity of the Mycoplasma fermentans M64 genome and metabolic essentiality and diversity among mycoplasmas. PLoS One 7:e32940. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032940.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Zimmerman CU,
    2. Herrmann R
    . 2005. Synthesis of a small, cysteine-rich, 29 amino acids long peptide in Mycoplasma pneumoniae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 253:315–321. doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2005.09.054.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Skapski A,
    2. Hygonenq MC,
    3. Sagné E,
    4. Guiral S,
    5. Citti C,
    6. Baranowski E
    . 2011. Genome-scale analysis of Mycoplasma agalactiae loci involved in interaction with host cells. PLoS One 6:e25291. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Crouzet M,
    2. Claverol S,
    3. Lomenech AM,
    4. Le Sénéchal CL,
    5. Costaglioli P,
    6. Barthe C,
    7. Garbay B,
    8. Bonneu M,
    9. Vilain S
    . 2017. Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells attached to a surface display a typical proteome early as 20 minutes of incubation. PLoS One 12:e0180341. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180341.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Nouvel LX,
    2. Marenda M,
    3. Sirand-Pugnet P,
    4. Sagné E,
    5. Glew M,
    6. Mangenot S,
    7. Barbe V,
    8. Barré A,
    9. Claverol S,
    10. Citti C
    . 2009. Occurrence, plasticity, and evolution of the vpma gene family, a genetic system devoted to high-frequency surface variation in Mycoplasma agalactiae. J Bacteriol 191:4111–4121. doi:10.1128/JB.00251-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Baranowski E,
    2. Bergonier D,
    3. Sagné E,
    4. Hygonenq MC,
    5. Ronsin P,
    6. Berthelot X,
    7. Citti C
    . 2014. Experimental infections with Mycoplasma agalactiae identify key factors involved in host-colonization. PLoS One 9:e93970. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093970.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Integrative Conjugative Element (ICE) of Mycoplasma agalactiae: Key Elements Involved in Horizontal Dissemination and Influence of Coresident ICEs
Eric Baranowski, Emilie Dordet-Frisoni, Eveline Sagné, Marie-Claude Hygonenq, Gabriela Pretre, Stéphane Claverol, Laura Fernandez, Laurent Xavier Nouvel, Christine Citti
mBio Jul 2018, 9 (4) e00873-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00873-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Integrative Conjugative Element (ICE) of Mycoplasma agalactiae: Key Elements Involved in Horizontal Dissemination and Influence of Coresident ICEs
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Integrative Conjugative Element (ICE) of Mycoplasma agalactiae: Key Elements Involved in Horizontal Dissemination and Influence of Coresident ICEs
Eric Baranowski, Emilie Dordet-Frisoni, Eveline Sagné, Marie-Claude Hygonenq, Gabriela Pretre, Stéphane Claverol, Laura Fernandez, Laurent Xavier Nouvel, Christine Citti
mBio Jul 2018, 9 (4) e00873-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00873-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

evolution
functional genomics
horizontal gene transfer
integrative conjugative element
Mycoplasma

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511