Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Observation

Novel Insights into Staphylococcus aureus Deep Bone Infections: the Involvement of Osteocytes

Dongqing Yang, Asiri R. Wijenayaka, Lucian B. Solomon, Stephen M. Pederson, David M. Findlay, Stephen P. Kidd, Gerald J. Atkins
Mark S. Smeltzer, Invited Editor, Richard P. Novick, Editor
Dongqing Yang
aCentre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asiri R. Wijenayaka
aCentre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucian B. Solomon
aCentre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen M. Pederson
bBioinformatics Hub, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Findlay
aCentre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen P. Kidd
cAustralian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Ecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
dResearch Centre for Infectious Disease, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen P. Kidd
Gerald J. Atkins
aCentre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark S. Smeltzer
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Roles: Invited Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard P. Novick
Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University Medical Center
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00415-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a potentially devastating complication of orthopedic joint replacement surgery. PJI with associated osteomyelitis is particularly problematic and difficult to cure. Whether viable osteocytes, the predominant cell type in mineralized bone tissue, have a role in these infections is not clear, although their involvement might contribute to the difficulty in detecting and clearing PJI. Here, using Staphylococcus aureus, the most common pathogen in PJI, we demonstrate intracellular infection of human-osteocyte-like cells in vitro and S. aureus adaptation by forming quasi-dormant small-colony variants (SCVs). Consistent patterns of host gene expression were observed between in vitro-infected osteocyte-like cultures, an ex vivo human bone infection model, and bone samples obtained from PJI patients. Finally, we confirm S. aureus infection of osteocytes in clinical cases of PJI. Our findings are consistent with osteocyte infection being a feature of human PJI and suggest that this cell type may provide a reservoir for silent or persistent infection. We suggest that elucidating the molecular/cellular mechanism(s) of osteocyte-bacterium interactions will contribute to better understanding of PJI and osteomyelitis, improved pathogen detection, and treatment.

IMPORTANCE Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are increasing and are recognized as one of the most common modes of failure of joint replacements. Osteomyelitis arising from PJI is challenging to treat and difficult to cure and increases patient mortality 5-fold. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen causing PJI. PJI can have subtle symptoms and lie dormant or go undiagnosed for many years, suggesting persistent bacterial infection. Osteocytes, the major bone cell type, reside in bony caves and tunnels, the lacuno-canalicular system. We report here that S. aureus can infect and reside in human osteocytes without causing cell death both experimentally and in bone samples from patients with PJI. We demonstrate that osteocytes respond to infection by the differential regulation of a large number of genes. S. aureus adapts during intracellular infection of osteocytes by adopting the quasi-dormant small-colony variant (SCV) lifestyle, which might contribute to persistent or silent infection. Our findings shed new light on the etiology of PJI and osteomyelitis in general.

OBSERVATION

Joint arthroplasty is a common and highly successful procedure; however, more than 1% of primary hip (1) and 1 to 3% of primary knee (2) arthroplasties fail due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). PJI carries a high risk of in-hospital and 5-year mortality (3, 4), and the cure rate after 2 years has been reported to be as low as 67% (5). These poor outcomes are due in part to incomplete knowledge of PJI disease etiology (6). In bone, osteoblasts (7) and osteoclasts (8) have been investigated in relation to bacterial infection. However, insufficient attention has been given to the role of the osteocyte in bone infection, despite this cell type constituting approximately 90 to 95% of cells in bone (9, 10). It has been reported that bacteria can reside in osteocytes in vivo (11, 12), and a recent study (13) demonstrated the ability of Staphylococcus aureus to invade the lacuno-canalicular spaces of cortical bone in an experimental osteomyelitis model, although infection of osteocytes per se was not reported in that study. The result of direct interaction between human osteocytes and bacteria remains to be investigated.

Staphylococci, in particular S. aureus and the coagulase-negative species Staphylococcus epidermidis, have been identified as the most common causative pathogens in bone infection (14, 15). In this study, S. aureus was investigated because of its common association with bone infection and its well-characterized ability to exist in the quasi-dormant small-colony variant (SCV) lifestyle, which potentially contributes to a chronic disease state (16). The interaction between human osteocytes and S. aureus was investigated first by experimental infection using the WCH-SK2 strain (17), a methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strain, at defined multiplicities of infection (MOIs). We utilized our well-characterized model of human-osteocyte-like cells generated by differentiation of human primary osteoblastic cultures to a mature, osteocyte-like state (18, 19). Day 28 differentiated osteocyte-like cells (Fig. S1) were cocultured with WCH-SK2 for 2 h, after which time extracellular bacteria were lysed using lysostaphin and washed to remove debris, leaving only internalized bacteria. There was no effect of infection on osteocyte-like cell viability, evidenced by the similar total cell numbers between the control and infected groups 30 days postinfection (Fig. 1A). Using live-cell imaging, uninfected osteocyte-like cells were observed to be relatively quiescent (see Movie S1 in the supplemental material), whereas cells exposed to green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing S. aureus (strain RN6390 [20]) were measurably active, with cell membranes and dendritic processes moving on average 25 µm nondirectionally in a 19-h time frame (Movie S2; Fig. 1B). Osteocyte-like cells were observed to have internalized WCH-SK2 cells; by 24 h postinfection, both dying bacteria with compromised cell walls (Fig. 1C) and actively proliferating S. aureus cells were observed in host cells (Fig. 1D to F). Among the proliferating S. aureus cells, distinctive phenotypes of dividing bacteria, including those with symmetrical and completely separated cell walls (Fig. 1D) and those with asymmetrical and incompletely separated cell walls (Fig. 1E and F), were observed. S. aureus cells with uneven and/or incomplete division were previously characterized as an adaptation to stress and, possibly, the initiation of SCV development. SCVs have a lower growth rate and lower virulence than normal cells but are able to persist inside host cells (16), avoiding immune and therapeutic antimicrobial interventions. Indeed, distinct bacterial colony types were grown from osteocyte-like lysates of cells of large (>1-mm) or small (<0.2-mm) sizes, the latter appearing as unpigmented (Fig. 1G). Overall, the total number of recovered CFU decreased from ~105 per well at day 1 to ~1,500 per well at day 5 (Fig. 1H). At day 5, approximately 80% of the total recovered colonies were of the small, unpigmented phenotype (Fig. 1G and H). A comparison of the gene expression profiles of the small and large colonies (in pools of 10 colonies of each type) showed that the metabolism-related genes accessory gene regulator A (agrA), staphylococcal accessory regulator A (sarA), and alkaline shock protein 23 (asp23) and the bacterial-virulence-related genes alpha-hemolysin (hla) and delta-hemolysin (hld) were not different between colony types, whereas the stress adaptation-related gene sigma factor B (sigB) was found to be increased 50-fold in small colonies (Fig. 1I). These data are consistent with those of previous studies showing that the formation of SCV cell types is strongly associated with sigB expression level (21, 22). Our finding suggests that the development of SCVs was initiated following internalization by human-osteocyte-like cells. In response to S. aureus invasion, the expression of a number of chemokine genes, including the neutrophil chemoattractants CCL5, CXCL1, and CXCL8 and chemokines related to T cell activation, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, was strongly upregulated. The elevation of these chemokines was dependent on exposure to live S. aureus and did not occur in the presence of heat-killed cells (Fig. 1J). The protein production of CCL5 (regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted [RANTES]) and CXCL10 (interferon gamma-induced protein 10 [IP10]) but not CXCL8 (interleukin-8 [IL-8]) were confirmed to be secreted by exposed osteocyte-like cells in an MOI-dependent manner (Fig. 1K). A comprehensive transcription profile of the osteocyte-like cell response to S. aureus WCH-SK2 exposure in vitro was determined by microarray and bioinformatics analyses. These revealed a large set of 1,526 differentially expressed genes (Fig. S2A). Network analysis revealed numerous gene ontology (GO) term “communities” relating to a variety of host innate immune responses and cell metabolic activities (Fig. S2B).

FIG S1 

Validation of the phenotype of osteocyte-like cells. (A) Presence of osteocytic markers, including OCN, DMP1, SOST, RANKL, and FGF23, in osteocyte-like cells differentiated for 28 days in comparison with the reference 18S mRNA gene in a real-time PCR of the cDNA sample of the control group from the microarray experiment. (B) Our previous characterization of one of the donors of primary osteocyte-like cells used in the microarray experiment, demonstrating the fold change in mRNA levels of the osteocyte markers DMP1 and SOST over a 4-week differentiation period. Data are presented normalized to day 0 values (means ± SEM from 3 independent biological replicates); the effect of differentiation time on each mRNA species was tested by one-way ANOVA, with relevant P values indicated. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.3 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Yang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2 

Bioinformatics profiling of the osteocyte response to S. aureus. (A) Volcano plot showing all 1,526 differentially expressed (DE) genes and cutoff values for inclusion in the gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis (the x axis represents the log2 values of mRNA fold changes [FC], and the y axis represents the −log10 values of significance [P values]). (B) The 202 enriched GO terms formed into communities based on the proportions of common DE genes between each pair of nodes. Each node represents a single GO term, with edges denoting the degree of connectedness between terms. Thicker edges correspond to a higher proportion of shared DE genes. Community hubs were defined as those with the most connections within each community and were used as community labels. The network layout and edge lengths were generated using a variation of the force-directed model. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 1.8 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Yang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

MOVIE S1 

Continuous imaging for 24 h of cell movements in the control group (related to Fig. 1B). Download MOVIE S1, AVI file, 16.8 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Yang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

MOVIE S2 

Continuous imaging for 24 h of cell movements in the infected group (related to Fig. 1B). Download MOVIE S2, AVI file, 16.8 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Yang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG 1 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1 

In vitro interaction between primary human-osteocyte-like cells and S. aureus. (A) Viability of osteocyte-like cells determined by DAPI staining of nuclei in the control (Ctrl) and infected (Inf) groups 30 days postinfection. (B) Time-lapse recording (13 to 18 h) of in vitro-differentiated human-osteocyte-like cell movement under S. aureus (strain RN6390; GFP labeled) infection. The sum of plasma membrane movements during the observation period was determined; data shown represent means ± standard errors of the means (SEM) for a pool of 10 cells from each of the Ctrl and Inf groups (P < 0.0001). TEM images of infected osteocyte-like cells showing dying S. aureus cells with compromised cell walls (C), proliferating S. aureus cells with evenly and completely divided cell walls (D), and proliferating S. aureus cells with unevenly and incompletely divided cell walls (E and F). (G) Recovered intracellular S. aureus on days 1, 3, and 5 featured with large and small (red arrowheads) sizes. (H) Quantification of intracellular and extracellular viable S. aureus CFU from days 1 to 5 (left y axis) and the percentage of small colonies recovered from host cells (right y axis) (graphs represent results from 3 independent biological replicates; values are means of results from the pool ± SEM). (I) Relative mRNA levels (normalized to 16S rRNA) of agrA, sarA, asp23, hla, hld, and sigB in recovered small and large colonies (values represent means from 3 independent biological replicates ± SEM). (J) Relative mRNA (normalized to 18S mRNA) levels of CCL5, CXCL1, CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 at 24 h in osteocyte-like cells under control, killed-S. aureus WCH-SK2 and live-S. aureus WCH-SK2 treatments with an MOI of 100. Data shown are means of normalized expression ± SEM from 4 independent biological replicates. Comparisons (t tests) and P values are indicated. ND, nondetectable. (K) Production of the chemokines RANTES, IL-8, and IP10 by osteocyte-like cells after 24 h of exposure to S. aureus WCH-SK2 at MOIs of 0, 1, 10, and 100 (mean levels ± SEM from 3 independent biological replicates); the effect of each MOI on chemokine production was tested by one-way ANOVA, with relevant P values indicated.

To investigate whether S. aureus is capable of penetrating human cancellous bone to contact osteocytes, fresh bone specimens were tested for susceptibility to bacterial infection ex vivo. Following a 12-h culture period, the presence of S. aureus in both occupied (Fig. 2A and B) and empty (Fig. 2C) osteocyte lacunae was observed by immunostaining. The specificity of antibody staining was validated by the use of a primary, isotype-matched control antibody (Fig. 2D). Consequently, the mRNA levels of CXCL1, CLCX8, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 were shown to be elevated following S. aureus invasion (Fig. 2E). The presence of intracellular S. aureus in osteocytes and the above-described host cell response were also confirmed in bone retrieved from PJI patients. Acetabular bone specimens from two patient cohorts, 24 with PJI (15 males and 9 females; age range, from 39 to 89 years) and 13 control patients with femoral neck fracture and no evidence of infection (3 males and 10 females; age range, from 22 to 87 years) were collected for examination. All members of the PJI cohort were S. aureus culture positive, as determined by routine diagnostic analysis of surgical biopsy specimens, and all were undergoing treatment by staged-revision total hip replacement surgery. A specimen from the iliac wing was also obtained from each patient to be able to compare the biopsy specimens with a skeletal site that was distal from the infected region and displayed no clinical signs of infection. All biopsy procedures were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of the Royal Adelaide Hospital and the University of Adelaide. Immunostaining (Fig. 2F), as well as intense staining of individual osteocyte lacunae and apparently viable osteocytes (Fig. 2F′), was carried out to examine specimens for the presence of S. aureus within bone tissue, and it identified S. aureus within the bone marrow. A three-dimensional reconstruction video of in situ confocal microscopy, scanning to a depth of 9 µm, was generated to confirm intracellular, cytoplasmic immunostaining of S. aureus (Movie S3). The specificity of staining was validated using isotype-matched antibody (Fig. 2G and G′). No positive staining was detected either in the corresponding iliac wing sample from the same patient or in acetabular samples from the femoral fracture cohort (Fig. S3A and S3B). Consistent with the presence of S. aureus in the PJI cohort bone, mRNA levels of a number of chemokines stimulated by infection, including CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 (Fig. 2H), were upregulated in bone specimens from the infected acetabulum site of PJI patients but not the uninfected iliac wing. Significantly elevated levels of these mRNA species were not observed in specimens from either acetabulum or iliac sites from the fracture cohort.

MOVIE S3 

Three-dimensional reconstruction video of an infected osteocyte in Fig. 2F′, with the confocal microscope scanning to a depth of 9 µm. Download MOVIE S3, AVI file, 2.4 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Yang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3 

Anti-S. aureus antibody staining. (A) Antibody staining targeting S. aureus in a PJI patient iliac wing bone; (B) antibody staining targeting S. aureus in a femoral fracture patient acetabular bone. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 1.7 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Yang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG 2 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2 

Interaction between osteocytes and S. aureus ex vivo and in clinical PJI specimens. (A and B) Presence of S. aureus (white arrowheads) in osteocyte (Ot)-occupied lacunae in bone tissue after ex vivo infection; (C) presence of S. aureus (white arrowhead) in empty lacunae (EL); (D) isotype-matched control immunostaining of infected bone tissue; (E) upregulation of mRNA levels of CXCL1, CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 in infected bone samples in comparison to control samples (the y axis represents log2 values of mRNA fold change [FC] and mean normalized expression ± SEM from 3 independent biological replicates); (F) immunostaining targeting S. aureus (red fluorescence) in the acetabular bone of a PJI patient, with the box marked by a broken red line indicating the enlarged area in panel F′; (F′) high-magnification image of S. aureus staining of osteocytes/osteocyte lacunae (white arrowheads); (G) isotype-matched control immunostaining of PJI patient acetabular bone; (G′) high-magnification image of control staining of osteocytes/osteocyte lacunae; (H) boxplots (median with interquartile range) showing relative mRNA levels (normalized to that of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [GAPDH] gene) of CCL5 (P = 0.026), CXCL9 (P = 0.038), CXCL10 (P = 0.054), and CXCL11 (P = 0.0070) in bone specimens from the iliac wing and acetabulum of the PJI cohort (n = 23) and femoral fracture cohort (n = 13). P values indicate the comparisons between acetabulum bone and iliac wing bone from PJI patients. BM, bone marrow.

In summary, we have confirmed that S. aureus is capable of infecting human osteocytes both in in vitro cell cultures and in ex vivo-infected bone tissue. We also demonstrate the presence of S. aureus antigens in viable osteocytes present in regions of infected PJI patient bone. Our findings extend previous observations that undifferentiated osteoblasts can become infected by S. aureus (7) and that S. aureus can invade the lacuno-canalicular spaces of mouse cortical bone in an experimental infection model (13). Our in vitro and clinical findings demonstrate that osteocytes are capable of responding robustly to S. aureus invasion by producing immune mediators, consistent with previous findings with other nonprofessional antigen-presenting cell types, including osteoblasts (23). Some of the upregulated chemokines in this study, such as RANTES (24) and IP10 (25), were previously shown to have direct antimicrobial activity to clear extracellular bacteria. In our osteocyte-like cell model, whether the reduced live intracellular S. aureus cell number is associated with chemokine production, production of another mediator, or lysosomal digestion by the host cell or a combination of all three is an important question that needs to be addressed. This might potentially give rise to a novel therapeutic approach, stimulating osteocytes to clear the viable intracellular bacteria that are refractory to the effects of antibiotics. The bony location of the infected osteocyte may render them refractory to clearance by immune cells, and, as such, osteocytes may be an immune-privileged cell type. The osteocyte may therefore serve as a reservoir of bacteria for future reinfection, perhaps explaining the high prevalence of infections that become apparent only after long periods of time or recur following surgical/medical management.

Our findings also demonstrate the capacity for planktonic-phase S. aureus to rapidly switch to an SCV lifestyle upon interaction with osteocytes, indicative of an adaptation to stress from the host cell. A previous study identified the presence of S. aureus SCVs in fibroblasts in tissue from chronic PJI patients and suggested that infections with SCVs represented a problematic subset of cases (26). Our findings suggest that SCVs form upon interaction with osteocytes, and, as such, all S. aureus PJIs have the potential to become chronic if this occurs. SCVs have been demonstrated to be significantly less sensitive to most antibiotic treatments, and this mechanism of dormancy has been suggested to be a strategy for bacteria to survive, either in biofilm or inside host cells in chronic diseases (27). Other cell types, such as fibroblasts (26) and osteoclasts (8), have been proposed as reservoirs for S. aureus infection in PJIs; however, these are relatively short-lived cells. Osteoblast infection has also been proposed, and while the nature of this cell type is transient, the cell type is capable of differentiating into osteocytes, and infected osteoblasts have been shown to retain the ability to differentiate in vitro (7). Given that differentiated osteocytes are the most numerous and long-lived cell type encountered by bacteria in hard-bone tissue and demonstrate viability upon infection with intracellular S. aureus, osteocytes might be the ideal host cell type for S. aureus to survive in the long term. We propose that further investigation of the role of the osteocyte in PJI is warranted.

Human-osteocyte-like cell model.Isolation and maintenance of primary human osteoblasts were performed as previously established (18). Cells were then differentiated in alpha minimal essential medium (αMEM; Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 5%, vol/vol, fetal calf serum (FCS; Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Scoresby, VIC, Australia), 1.8 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 100 µM ascorbate-2-phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), and standard tissue culture l-glutamine–antibiotics (Life Technologies, Inc.). Cells were allowed to differentiate for 4 weeks in a humidified incubator in an atmosphere of 5% CO2–normoxia at 37°C.

Bacterial strains.The clinical isolate of S. aureus used, unless otherwise stated, was WCH-SK2 (17). S. aureus stain RN6390 engineered with green fluorescent protein (GFP) (20) was kindly provided by Clare Cooksley (Basil Hetzel Institute, SA, Australia). All bacterial-suspension cultures were maintained in Terrific broth (ThermoFisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37°C with agitation, and bacterial colonies were grown on Terrific broth with 1.2%, wt/vol, agar.

Human bone biopsy specimens.Bone specimens from two cohorts, namely, patients identified with S. aureus-related PJI following total hip replacement or a femoral fracture, were collected for immunohistochemistry and gene expression analyses. Samples from two different skeletal sites, the acetabulum and iliac wing, were included. Bone samples from femoral fracture patients were also utilized for ex vivo infection experiments. All the usage and operation procedures for collecting human bone biopsy specimens were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of the Royal Adelaide Hospital and the University of Adelaide.

In vitro and ex vivo infection of osteocytes and bacterial colony recovery.S. aureus WCH-SK2 actively growing in its log-phase stage was used for in vitro and ex vivo infection experiments, except for the live-cell imaging observation. A colorimetric method measuring light absorption of a bacterial suspension at 600 nm was employed to determine the number of CFU per volume for standardizing a multiplicity of infection (MOI). Bacterial suspensions were adjusted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to achieve an MOI of 1, 10, or 100 for the purposes of testing the dosage-dependent effects of MOIs on the production of chemokine levels; otherwise, an MOI of 100 was used. Bacterial suspensions were then used to inoculate differentiated osteocyte-like cultures. After an initial infection period of 2 h, media were aspirated and replaced with antibiotic-free differentiation medium supplemented with 20 µg/ml lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich) to lyse remaining extracellular bacteria. An estimation of total host cell number 30 days postinfection in both control and infected cultures was carried out by counting the eukaryotic nuclei number using DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining and fluorescence microscopy (Olympus IX71 microscope) and by image analysis using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Osteocyte-like cultures were lysed in TRIzol reagent 24 h postinfection before performance of gene expression analyses as described below, and cell culture supernatants were collected for measuring secreted protein levels of RANTES (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] kit; Caribbean Park, VIC, Australia), IL-8 (ELISA kit), and IP10 (DIP100; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) by ELISA. For ex vivo infection experiments, bone specimens from femoral fracture patients were dissected into 1-mm3 pieces and washed with PBS to remove the bone marrow fraction. Cleaned bone pieces were then cultured without bacteria as a control and with S. aureus adjusted to 103 CFU per mm3 of bone volume as the infected group for 12 h. Specimens from both groups were then processed both for total RNA extraction using the TRIzol method and for immunostaining to detect S. aureus.

For the recovery of intracellular bacteria, osteocyte-like cultures were lysed in sterile water. Cell lysates were evenly distributed on Terrific broth/agar plates and cultured overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2. Agar plates were then kept at room temperature under aerobic conditions for 48 h to develop a gold pigmentation in resultant colonies, which is a typical feature of planktonic S. aureus. Following such growth development, colonies with a 0.2-mm diameter or less were counted as SCVs; both total colony counts and percentages of cells that were SCVs were recorded from each of the retrieval time points.

Live-cell imaging of osteocyte-like cell infection.For live-cell imaging, primary human osteoblasts were seeded in 8-well chamber slides (ibidi GmbH, Martinsried, Germany) and differentiated for 4 weeks, as described above. GFP-expressing S. aureus RN6390 was used to inoculate osteocyte-like cultures at an MOI of 10 for 2 h, followed by removal of extracellular bacteria by lysostaphin digestion. A Nikon TiE microscope with live-cell culturing components was utilized for imaging the interaction between host cells and bacteria over a 24-h time course. Osteocyte-like cells were visualized using the differential interference contrast (DIC) channel, and S. aureus cells were visualized using the GFP channel (excitation at 475 nm, emission collection between 520 and 560 nm). Images of identical regions within control and infected groups were taken every 5 min, and all serial images were stitched to generate video files for each treatment group. The video files in Movie S1 and S2 demonstrated the cell activities from 4 to 24 h. The movements of one infected cell from 13 to 18 h are depicted in Fig. 1B. Osteocyte-like cell plasma membrane movement was quantified from serial static images with a 30-min interval, using ImageJ software.

TEM visualization of intracellular S. aureus.Osteocyte-like cultures were infected with S. aureus WCH-SK2 in T75 flasks. Cells were harvested in pellet form 24 h postinfection and sequentially stabilized in fixative comprising 4%, wt/vol, paraformaldehyde–1.25%, wt/vol, glycolaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.2) and then in 2%, wt/vol, osmium tetroxide in water. Cell pellets were embedded in resin blocks, and 5-µm sections were taken for transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Philips CM200) imaging.

Preparation of total RNA and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis.Total RNA samples were prepared from ex vivo bone tissue, in vitro osteocyte-like cultures, and bacterial colonies by using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. For RNA isolation from bacteria, 30 min of lysostaphin (20 µg/ml) digestion at 37°C was performed prior to the addition of TRIzol (28). cDNA was synthesized using the iScript kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, USA). The mRNA expression of genes of interest was measured by real-time PCR using the RT2 SYBR Green quantitative PCR (qPCR) master mix (Qiagen, Limburg, the Netherlands), and relative expression was analyzed using the ΔCT method (where CT is threshold cycle). The efficiency of all primer pairs used (Table S1) was close to optimal, since a 10-fold dilution of the template resulted in an increase in CT by 3.3-fold (data not shown).

TABLE S1 

Primer sets used in this study. Download TABLE S1, PDF file, 0.04 MB.
Copyright © 2018 Yang et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Gene microarray and bioinformatics analysis.For each sample, 400 ng total RNA was amplified using the Ambion whole-transcript (WT) expression kit (ThermoFisher), and the Affymetrix GeneChip WT terminus-labeling kit (ThermoFisher) was employed to produce biotin-labeled fragmented cDNA. Each labeled cDNA sample was hybridized to the Affymetrix human gene 2.0 ST array for 17 h at 45°C. Experimental triplicates of gene chip hybridization were carried out for both the control and infected groups. Microarray chips were washed and stained with a fluorescence-labeled antibody using a model 450 Affymetrix fluidics station. Gene chips were scanned using an Affymetrix 3000 7G scanner. Microarray analysis was performed using Partek Genomics Suite v6.5. The generated raw data as .Cel files were processed using the multiarray average (RMA) method (29). Comparisons between treatments were performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), with Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple tests (30). Genes were considered significantly differentially expressed (DE) using an FDR-adjusted P value of <0.01 and an estimated log2 fold change (log2FC) beyond ±1, giving 1,526 unique Entrez Gene identifiers considered to be DE. The set of DE identifiers was tested for enrichment of Gene Ontology (GO) terms using the Fisher exact test and a set of background genes, defined as those included on the array but with an unadjusted P value of >0.05. GO terms with fewer than 4 steps back to the ontology roots were discarded, leaving 8,607 GO terms tested for enrichment. GO terms were considered enriched in the set of DE genes if they received a Bonferroni-adjusted P value of <0.05, yielding 202 enriched GO terms. For the purposes of visualization, GO terms were formed into communities using the common genes within each term (31), with the “hub” or most-connected GO terms labeled in Fig. S1B.

Immunohistochemistry analyses on human bone biopsy specimens.Bone specimens for immunohistochemistry analysis were stabilized and decalcified in TheraLin tissue fixative (Grace Bio-Labs, Bend, OR, USA) at room temperature for 3 days. Samples were then embedded in paraffin, and 10-µm sections from each of the samples were taken to perform immunohistochemistry staining. Antibody targeting S. aureus (AB37644; Abcam, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) was used at a 1:100 dilution for staining at 4°C for 1 h to detect the pathogen. Primary antibody signals were tagged by Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (H+L) secondary antibody (A-21239; Life Technologies, Inc.) for visualization. The specificity of antibody staining was validated by following the same staining procedures, using matched-isotype control antibody (14-4742-81; ThermoFisher) for primary detection. DAPI was employed to label nuclei of cells through all sections. All samples were imaged with an Olympus FV3000 confocal microscope. The underlying bone structure was visualized using the transmission detection function, which generates a gray-scale image of the tissue section surface.

Statistical analyses.One-tailed t tests with Welch’s correction were used for examining the differences in cell movements in Fig. 1B, mRNA levels of the chemokine gene panel in Fig. 1J, and gene expression in bone biopsy specimens between infection and iliac wing sites from the PJI cohort in Fig. 2H. One-tailed tests were used in the case of membrane movement because cells clearly changed from an inactive to an active state and in the case of host cell gene expression responses, because gene microarray analysis indicated that the genes examined were strongly induced. Two-tailed t tests with Welch’s correction were employed for examining the differences in total cell numbers in Fig. 1A and sigB mRNA levels in Fig. 1I, because no assumption was made for the behavior of either host cells or bacteria. One-way ANOVA tests were used for determining the effects of various MOIs on chemokine production levels in Fig. 1K. Exact P values for each test are shown on the respective figure, where applicable. Statistical analysis was not applicable for data sets containing nondetectable (ND) values.

Accession number(s).Microarray experiment raw files have been deposited in the server of ArrayExpress (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-6700/) and made available to the public.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We sincerely appreciate the willingness of all patients to participate in this study and the kind assistance of clinical staff from the Royal Adelaide Hospital with collection of the bone specimens. We thank Agatha Labrinidis from Adelaide Microscopy, the University of Adelaide, for assistance with microscopy imaging.

This study was funded in part by a project grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC; grant 1106029) and by a grant-in-aid from the Royal Adelaide Hospital Research Fund. G.J.A. was supported by an NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship.

D.Y., A.R.W., and G.J.A. framed this study and designed experiments in detail. D.Y. and A.R.W. conducted the experiments and collected data. D.Y., A.R.W., and G.J.A. analyzed and interpreted data. L.B.S. directed the collection of clinical bone specimens and provided clinical insight into the study. S.M.P. performed bioinformatics analysis. S.P.K. provided guidance for the microbiological aspects of the study. D.M.F. provided scientific insight.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 20 February 2018
    • Accepted 29 March 2018
    • Published 24 April 2018
  • Copyright © 2018 Yang et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Dale H,
    2. Hallan G,
    3. Espehaug B,
    4. Havelin LI,
    5. Engesaeter LB
    . 2009. Increasing risk of revision due to deep infection after hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 80:639–645. doi:10.3109/17453670903506658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kurtz SM,
    2. Ong KL,
    3. Lau E,
    4. Bozic KJ,
    5. Berry D,
    6. Parvizi J
    . 2010. Prosthetic joint infection risk after TKA in the Medicare population. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:52–56. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1013-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Shahi A,
    2. Tan TL,
    3. Chen AF,
    4. Maltenfort MG,
    5. Parvizi J
    . 2017. In-hospital mortality in patients with periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 32:948–952.e1. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.027.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zmistowski B,
    2. Karam JA,
    3. Durinka JB,
    4. Casper DS,
    5. Parvizi J
    . 2013. Periprosthetic joint infection increases the risk of one-year mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:2177–2184. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00789.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wimmer MD,
    2. Friedrich MJ,
    3. Randau TM,
    4. Ploeger MM,
    5. Schmolders J,
    6. Strauss AA,
    7. Hischebeth GT,
    8. Pennekamp PH,
    9. Vavken P,
    10. Gravius S
    . 2016. Polymicrobial infections reduce the cure rate in prosthetic joint infections: outcome analysis with two-stage exchange and follow-up ≥two years. Int Orthop 40:1367–1373. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2871-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Henderson RA,
    2. Austin MS
    . 2017. Management of periprosthetic joint infection: the more we learn, the less we know. J Arthroplasty 32:2056–2059. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.023.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tuchscherr L,
    2. Medina E,
    3. Hussain M,
    4. Völker W,
    5. Heitmann V,
    6. Niemann S,
    7. Holzinger D,
    8. Roth J,
    9. Proctor RA,
    10. Becker K,
    11. Peters G,
    12. Löffler B
    . 2011. Staphylococcus aureus phenotype switching: an effective bacterial strategy to escape host immune response and establish a chronic infection. EMBO Mol Med 3:129–141. doi:10.1002/emmm.201000115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Trouillet-Assant S,
    2. Gallet M,
    3. Nauroy P,
    4. Rasigade JP,
    5. Flammier S,
    6. Parroche P,
    7. Marvel J,
    8. Ferry T,
    9. Vandenesch F,
    10. Jurdic P,
    11. Laurent F
    . 2015. Dual impact of live Staphylococcus aureus on the osteoclast lineage, leading to increased bone resorption. J Infect Dis 211:571–581. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiu386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Prideaux M,
    2. Findlay DM,
    3. Atkins GJ
    . 2016. Osteocytes: the master cells in bone remodelling. Curr Opin Pharmacol 28:24–30. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2016.02.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bonewald LF
    . 2011. The amazing osteocyte. J Bone Miner Res 26:229–238. doi:10.1002/jbmr.320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bosse MJ,
    2. Gruber HE,
    3. Ramp WK
    . 2005. Internalization of bacteria by osteoblasts in a patient with recurrent, long-term osteomyelitis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1343–1347.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Reilly SS,
    2. Hudson MC,
    3. Kellam JF,
    4. Ramp WK
    . 2000. In vivo internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by embryonic chick osteoblasts. Bone 26:63–70. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00239-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. de Mesy Bentley KL,
    2. Trombetta R,
    3. Nishitani K,
    4. Bello-Irizarry SN,
    5. Ninomiya M,
    6. Zhang L,
    7. Chung HL,
    8. McGrath JL,
    9. Daiss JL,
    10. Awad HA,
    11. Kates SL,
    12. Schwarz EM
    . 2017. Evidence of Staphylococcus aureus deformation, proliferation, and migration in canaliculi of live cortical bone in murine models of osteomyelitis. J Bone Miner Res 32:985–990. doi:10.1002/jbmr.3055.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Guo G,
    2. Wang J,
    3. You Y,
    4. Tan J,
    5. Shen H
    . 2017. Distribution characteristics of Staphylococcus spp. in different phases of periprosthetic joint infection: a review. Exp Ther Med 13:2599–2608. doi:10.3892/etm.2017.4300.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Tong SY,
    2. Davis JS,
    3. Eichenberger E,
    4. Holland TL,
    5. Fowler VG, Jr..
    2015. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:603–661. doi:10.1128/CMR.00134-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Proctor RA,
    2. von Eiff C,
    3. Kahl BC,
    4. Becker K,
    5. McNamara P,
    6. Herrmann M,
    7. Peters G
    . 2006. Small colony variants: a pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:295–305. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1384.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bui LM,
    2. Hoffmann P,
    3. Turnidge JD,
    4. Zilm PS,
    5. Kidd SP
    . 2015. Prolonged growth of a clinical Staphylococcus aureus strain selects for a stable small-colony-variant cell type. Infect Immun 83:470–481. doi:10.1128/IAI.02702-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Atkins GJ,
    2. Rowe PS,
    3. Lim HP,
    4. Welldon KJ,
    5. Ormsby R,
    6. Wijenayaka AR,
    7. Zelenchuk L,
    8. Evdokiou A,
    9. Findlay DM
    . 2011. Sclerostin is a locally acting regulator of late-osteoblast/preosteocyte differentiation and regulates mineralization through a MEPE-ASARM-dependent mechanism. J Bone Miner Res 26:1425–1436. doi:10.1002/jbmr.345.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kogawa M,
    2. Wijenayaka AR,
    3. Ormsby RT,
    4. Thomas GP,
    5. Anderson PH,
    6. Bonewald LF,
    7. Findlay DM,
    8. Atkins GJ
    . 2013. Sclerostin regulates release of bone mineral by osteocytes by induction of carbonic anhydrase 2. J Bone Miner Res 28:2436–2448. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Qazi SN,
    2. Harrison SE,
    3. Self T,
    4. Williams P,
    5. Hill PJ
    . 2004. Real-time monitoring of intracellular Staphylococcus aureus replication. J Bacteriol 186:1065–1077. doi:10.1128/JB.186.4.1065-1077.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Tuchscherr L,
    2. Bischoff M,
    3. Lattar SM,
    4. Noto Llana M,
    5. Pförtner H,
    6. Niemann S,
    7. Geraci J,
    8. Van de Vyver H,
    9. Fraunholz MJ,
    10. Cheung AL,
    11. Herrmann M,
    12. Völker U,
    13. Sordelli DO,
    14. Peters G,
    15. Löffler B
    . 2015. Sigma factor SigB is crucial to mediate Staphylococcus aureus adaptation during chronic infections. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004870. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004870.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Tuchscherr L,
    2. Geraci J,
    3. Löffler B
    . 2017. Staphylococcus aureus regulator sigma B is important to develop chronic infections in hematogenous murine osteomyelitis model. Pathogens 6. doi:10.3390/pathogens6030031.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Gasper NA,
    2. Petty CC,
    3. Schrum LW,
    4. Marriott I,
    5. Bost KL
    . 2002. Bacterium-induced CXCL10 secretion by osteoblasts can be mediated in part through Toll-like receptor 4. Infect Immun 70:4075–4082. doi:10.1128/IAI.70.8.4075-4082.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Tang YQ,
    2. Yeaman MR,
    3. Selsted ME
    . 2002. Antimicrobial peptides from human platelets. Infect Immun 70:6524–6533. doi:10.1128/IAI.70.12.6524-6533.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Cole AM,
    2. Ganz T,
    3. Liese AM,
    4. Burdick MD,
    5. Liu L,
    6. Strieter RM
    . 2001. Cutting edge: IFN-inducible ELR-CXC chemokines display defensin-like antimicrobial activity. J Immunol 167:623–627.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Sendi P,
    2. Rohrbach M,
    3. Graber P,
    4. Frei R,
    5. Ochsner PE,
    6. Zimmerli W
    . 2006. Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants in prosthetic joint infection. Clin Infect Dis 43:961–967. doi:10.1086/507633.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ou JJ,
    2. Drilling AJ,
    3. Cooksley C,
    4. Bassiouni A,
    5. Kidd SP,
    6. Psaltis AJ,
    7. Wormald PJ,
    8. Vreugde S
    . 2016. Reduced innate immune response to a Staphylococcus aureus small colony variant compared to its wild-type parent strain. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:187. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2016.00187.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Atshan SS,
    2. Shamsudin MN,
    3. Lung LT,
    4. Ling KH,
    5. Sekawi Z,
    6. Pei CP,
    7. Ghaznavi-Rad E
    . 2012. Improved method for the isolation of RNA from bacteria refractory to disruption, including S. aureus producing biofilm. Gene 494:219–224. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2011.12.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Irizarry RA,
    2. Hobbs B,
    3. Collin F,
    4. Beazer-Barclay YD,
    5. Antonellis KJ,
    6. Scherf U,
    7. Speed TP
    . 2003. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4:249–264. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Benjamini Y,
    2. Hochberg Y
    . 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B Stat Methodol 57:289–300.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Mäkinen VP,
    2. Forsblom C,
    3. Thorn LM,
    4. Wadén J,
    5. Kaski K,
    6. Ala-Korpela M,
    7. Groop PH
    . 2009. Network of vascular diseases, death and biochemical characteristics in a set of 4,197 patients with type 1 diabetes (the FinnDiane Study). Cardiovasc Diabetol 8:54. doi:10.1186/1475-2840-8-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Novel Insights into Staphylococcus aureus Deep Bone Infections: the Involvement of Osteocytes
Dongqing Yang, Asiri R. Wijenayaka, Lucian B. Solomon, Stephen M. Pederson, David M. Findlay, Stephen P. Kidd, Gerald J. Atkins
mBio Apr 2018, 9 (2) e00415-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00415-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel Insights into Staphylococcus aureus Deep Bone Infections: the Involvement of Osteocytes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Novel Insights into Staphylococcus aureus Deep Bone Infections: the Involvement of Osteocytes
Dongqing Yang, Asiri R. Wijenayaka, Lucian B. Solomon, Stephen M. Pederson, David M. Findlay, Stephen P. Kidd, Gerald J. Atkins
mBio Apr 2018, 9 (2) e00415-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00415-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • OBSERVATION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Staphylococcus aureus
bone infection
osteomyelitis
periprosthetic joint infection
small-colony variant
stress adaptation

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511