Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article

Immune Protection against Lethal Fungal-Bacterial Intra-Abdominal Infections

Elizabeth A. Lilly, Melanie Ikeh, Evelyn E. Nash, Paul L. Fidel Jr., Mairi C. Noverr
Michael Lorenz, Editor
Elizabeth A. Lilly
aCenter of Excellence in Oral and Craniofacial Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Centre School of Dentistry, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melanie Ikeh
aCenter of Excellence in Oral and Craniofacial Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Centre School of Dentistry, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evelyn E. Nash
aCenter of Excellence in Oral and Craniofacial Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Centre School of Dentistry, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul L. Fidel Jr.
aCenter of Excellence in Oral and Craniofacial Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Centre School of Dentistry, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mairi C. Noverr
aCenter of Excellence in Oral and Craniofacial Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Centre School of Dentistry, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
bDepartment of Prosthodontics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Centre School of Dentistry, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Lorenz
University of Texas Health Science Center
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01472-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1 

    Role of NAC species in protection against lethal polymicrobial IAI. Mice (n = 10/group) were injected i.p. with 3.5 × 107 CFU of C. dubliniensis (Cd) C. glabrata (Cg), C. tropicalis (Ct), or C. krusei (Ck) alone (standard inocula) or in combination with 8 × 107 CFU of S. aureus (Sa) (standard inocula) as a primary challenge, and then rechallenged with C. albicans/S. aureus after 14 days (A) or injected i.p. with C. dubliniensis/S. aureus as the primary challenge and rechallenged with C. albicans (Ca), C. tropicalis, or C. krusei in combination with S. aureus after 14 days (standard inocula) (B). Animals receiving no primary challenge served as the positive (lethal) control. Mice were monitored for 10 days post-rechallenge. Data are representative of 2 separate experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.0001 (significantly different from control by log rank Mantel-Cox test).

  • FIG 2 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2 

    Limits of C. dubliniensis-mediated protection against lethal polymicrobial IAI. Mice (n = 10/group) were injected i.p. with different permutations of viable and nonviable C. dubliniensis and S. aureus as the primary challenge followed by rechallenge with C. albicans/S. aureus (standard inocula). Animals receiving no primary challenge served as the positive (lethal) control. Mice were monitored for 10 days post-rechallenge. Data are representative of 3 separate experiments. *, significantly different from control (P < 0.05) by log rank Mantel-Cox test.

  • FIG 3 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3 

    C. dubliniensis induces long term protection against polymicrobial IAI. Mice (n = 10/group) were injected i.p. with C. dubliniensis and S. aureus as the primary challenge 14, 30, and 60 days prior to rechallenge with C. albicans / S. aureus (standard inocula). Animals receiving no primary challenge served as the positive (lethal) control. Mice were monitored for 10 days post-rechallenge. *, significantly different from control (P < 0.05) by log rank Mantel-Cox test.

  • FIG 4 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4 

    Role of T and B cells in C. dubliniensis-induced protection. RAG mice (deficient in T and B cells) (n = 10) and the background congenic strain, C57BL/6J mice (n = 10) were given the primary challenge of C. dubliniensis and S. aureus 30 days or 14 days prior to rechallenge with C. albicans/S. aureus (standard inocula). Animals receiving no primary challenge served as the positive (lethal) controls. Mice were monitored for 10 days post-rechallenge. *, significantly different from control (P < 0.05) by log rank Mantel-Cox test.

  • FIG 5 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5 

    Role of macrophages in C. dubliniensis-induced protection. Mice (n = 10/group) previously given the primary challenge of C. dubliniensis/S. aureus (14 days prior) were injected i.p. with liposome-encapsulated clodronate (which results in ~90% depletion of resident peritoneal macrophages), liposomes only, or PBS 1 day prior to rechallenge with C. albicans/S. aureus. Animals receiving no primary challenge also served as the positive (lethal) controls. Mice were monitored for 10 days post-rechallenge. *, significantly different from control (P < 0.02) by log rank Mantel-Cox test.

  • FIG 6 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6 

    Presence of PMNLs in C. albicans/S. aureus rechallenged, protected animals. Mice (n = 10/group) were given the primary challenge of C. dubliniensis/S. aureus and rechallenged with C. albicans/S. aureus 14 days later. Control mice (n = 10) received no primary challenge. (A) H&E-stained smears of PMNLs from peritoneal lavage fluid collected 4 h after rechallenge. The illustration is representative of several individual mice evaluated. (B) Flow cytometry analysis results of PMNLs from peritoneal lavage fluid prior to rechallenge through 96 h post-rechallenge with C. albicans/S. aureus. Percentages indicate proportions of Gr-1hi PMNLs present in the total cell population. MFI of Gr-1hi PMNLs within the encircled areas are shown in red. The illustration is representative of results for several individual mice evaluated. (C) Microbial burden (C. albicans and S. aureus) in peritoneal lavage fluid of mice 4 h post-rechallenge through 10 days post-rechallenge with C. albicans/S. aureus in those that remained alive. Data are cumulative for all animals from each group. Mφ, macrophage(s).

  • FIG 7 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7 

    PMNL depletion abrogates protection. Mice (n = 10/group) given the primary challenge of C. dubliniensis/S. aureus were injected i.p. with 200 µg anti-Gr-1 (Ly6G/C) antibodies to deplete PMNLs or isotype control antibodies 48 h prior to and 2 h after rechallenge with C. albicans/S. aureus. Antibodies were given every 2 days to the remaining live animals for the duration of the study. Mice were monitored for 10 days post-rechallenge. *, significantly different from control (P = 0.02) by log rank Mantel-Cox test.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • TABLE 1 

    NAC species (with or without S. aureus coinfection) primary challenge survival

    Primary challenge% survivalc after
    primary challenge
    MTDd (days)
    NAC speciesaS. aureusb
    C. dubliniensis−100NA
    C. glabrata−100NA
    C. krusei−100NA
    C. tropicalis−100NA
    C. dubliniensis+903
    C. glabrata+100NA
    C. krusei+504
    C. tropicalis+406
    • ↵a Inoculum of 1.75 × 107 live Candida sp. cells injected i.p.

    • ↵b Inoculum of 8 × 107 live S. aureus cells injected i.p.

    • ↵c Results are cumulative from 5 studies with a 14-day observation period.

    • ↵d MTD, median time to death of mice that succumbed to infection. NA, not applicable.

  • TABLE 2 

    Limits of C. albicans-mediated protection

    Primary challenge% survival after:
    C. albicansaS. aureusbPrimary
    challengec
    Rechallenge with
    C. albicans/S. aureus
    −−NA25
    Live C. albicans−40 (9)50
    Killed C. albicans−1000
    −Live S. aureus10025
    −Killed C. albicans10020
    Live C. albicansKilled S. aureus60 (5)15
    Killed C. albicansLive S. aureus10090
    Killed C. albicansKilled S. aureus1000
    • ↵a Inoculum of 1.75 × 107 live or killed C. albicans was injected i.p.

    • ↵b Inoculum of 8 × 107 live or killed S. aureus was injected i.p.

    • ↵c Results are cumulative from 6 studies with a 14-day observation period. NA, not applicable. Values in parentheses indicate the median time to death of mice that succumbed to infection.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • FIG S1 

    Limits of C. albicans-mediated protection. Mice (n = 10/group) were injected i.p. with the standard 2.5× inocula of viable Ca (1.75 × 107), a 1× inocula (7 × 106), or a 0.14× inocula of 1 × 106 as the primary challenge followed by re-challenge with Ca/Sa (standard inocula) after 14 days. Animals receiving no primary challenge served as the positive (lethal) control. Mice were monitored for 10 days post re-challenge. Data are representative of 4 separate experiments. (A) Survival of animals in the 14-day primary challenge. (B) Survival of animals after re-challenge with Ca/Sa. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Lilly et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2 

    Confirmation of macrophage and PMNL depletion. (A) Cd/Sa mice (n = 10/group) were injected i.p. with liposome-encapsulated clodronate one day prior to re-challenge with Ca/Sa to deplete macrophages. Empty liposomes or PBS alone were administered to control animals. Peritoneal lavage fluid was analyzed by flow cytometry to confirm depletion with red arrows indicating F4/80+ cells (macrophages). (B) Mice (n = 10/group) given the primary challenge of Cd/Sa were injected i.p. with 200 μg anti-Gr-1 (Ly6G/C) antibodies to deplete PMNLs or isotype control antibodies 48 h prior to and 2 h after re-challenge with Ca/Sa. Peritoneal lavage fluid was analyzed by flow cytometry to confirm depletion just prior to re-challenge with Ca/Sa. PMNLs are shown within the red encircled areas. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2018 Lilly et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Immune Protection against Lethal Fungal-Bacterial Intra-Abdominal Infections
Elizabeth A. Lilly, Melanie Ikeh, Evelyn E. Nash, Paul L. Fidel Jr., Mairi C. Noverr
mBio Jan 2018, 9 (1) e01472-17; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01472-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immune Protection against Lethal Fungal-Bacterial Intra-Abdominal Infections
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Immune Protection against Lethal Fungal-Bacterial Intra-Abdominal Infections
Elizabeth A. Lilly, Melanie Ikeh, Evelyn E. Nash, Paul L. Fidel Jr., Mairi C. Noverr
mBio Jan 2018, 9 (1) e01472-17; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01472-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Candida albicans
immune protection
Staphylococcus aureus
innate immunity
intra-abdominal infection

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511