Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article

Complete Biosynthesis of Anthocyanins Using E. coli Polycultures

J. Andrew Jones, Victoria R. Vernacchio, Shannon M. Collins, Abhijit N. Shirke, Yu Xiu, Jacob A. Englaender, Brady F. Cress, Catherine C. McCutcheon, Robert J. Linhardt, Richard A. Gross, Mattheos A. G. Koffas
Sang Yup Lee, Editor
J. Andrew Jones
a Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
d Department of Chemistry, Hamilton College, Clinton, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria R. Vernacchio
a Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannon M. Collins
a Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abhijit N. Shirke
c Department of Chemistry, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu Xiu
a Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
e State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China
f Beijing Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Functional Food, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob A. Englaender
b Department of Biological Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brady F. Cress
a Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine C. McCutcheon
d Department of Chemistry, Hamilton College, Clinton, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert J. Linhardt
a Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
b Department of Biological Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
c Department of Chemistry, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Gross
c Department of Chemistry, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mattheos A. G. Koffas
a Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
b Department of Biological Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sang Yup Lee
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00621-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Fermentation-based chemical production strategies provide a feasible route for the rapid, safe, and sustainable production of a wide variety of important chemical products, ranging from fuels to pharmaceuticals. These strategies have yet to find wide industrial utilization due to their inability to economically compete with traditional extraction and chemical production methods. Here, we engineer for the first time the complex microbial biosynthesis of an anthocyanin plant natural product, starting from sugar. This was accomplished through the development of a synthetic, 4-strain Escherichia coli polyculture collectively expressing 15 exogenous or modified pathway enzymes from diverse plants and other microbes. This synthetic consortium-based approach enables the functional expression and connection of lengthy pathways while effectively managing the accompanying metabolic burden. The de novo production of specific anthocyanin molecules, such as calistephin, has been an elusive metabolic engineering target for over a decade. The utilization of our polyculture strategy affords milligram-per-liter production titers. This study also lays the groundwork for significant advances in strain and process design toward the development of cost-competitive biochemical production hosts through nontraditional methodologies.

IMPORTANCE To efficiently express active extensive recombinant pathways with high flux in microbial hosts requires careful balance and allocation of metabolic resources such as ATP, reducing equivalents, and malonyl coenzyme A (malonyl-CoA), as well as various other pathway-dependent cofactors and precursors. To address this issue, we report the design, characterization, and implementation of the first synthetic 4-strain polyculture. Division of the overexpression of 15 enzymes and transcription factors over 4 independent strain modules allowed for the division of metabolic burden and for independent strain optimization for module-specific metabolite needs. This study represents the most complex synthetic consortia constructed to date for metabolic engineering applications and provides a new paradigm in metabolic engineering for the reconstitution of extensive metabolic pathways in nonnative hosts.

INTRODUCTION

Microbial communities are ubiquitous in nature. In much the same way that multicellular eukaryotic organisms have evolved to contain specialized organelles that work together to seamlessly perform specialized tasks, communities of unicellular organisms have evolved similar divisions within their populations, such that microbial consortia amount to more than simply a sum of individual parts (1–5). These complex consortia allow for a cellular specialization, enabling the community to withstand larger environmental perturbations and perform more complex tasks than any of its individual constituents. Employment of this “division of labor” approach allows for a burden to be distributed across the population, permitting increased efficiency and more complex behavior than is possible in monoculture.

The study and application of natural microbial consortia have been topics of interest in the scientific literature for decades (6–8); however, the development of synthetic consortia, specifically consortia for metabolic engineering applications, has gained significant traction in the past few years (9–13). Several excellent examples of employing microbial communities for metabolic engineering have resulted in significant improvements over monoculture efforts (14). These gains were realized through utilization of the key advantages of microbial consortia, including (i) selection of the most efficient organism for the bioconversion (i.e., mixing bacterial and fungal hosts in a single consortium), (ii) use of traditional metabolic engineering principles (“push, pull, block”) to optimize each module for its specific cofactor and precursor needs, (iii) taking advantage of consortium modularity such that individual strains can be genetically optimized in monoculture and then applied in mixed culture without the need to reperform the genetic optimization, and (iv) capitalizing on the natural transportation of intermediate pathway metabolites in and out of the cells. The latter point could be considered a disadvantage of the polyculture strategy when transport does not occur naturally and is not easily engineered. Given the benefits of microbial consortia, however, this presents a unique motivation for researchers to vigorously investigate and engineer both natural and novel transport systems for targeted pathway intermediates.

Although successful, these efforts have primarily focused on utilizing two strains in coculture. The development of polycultures, defined as the combination of three or more strains in a single coculture, is an important next step toward the goal of developing synthetic consortia that can rival the complexity of systems found in nature. In the present study, we discuss the development and application of a modular polyculture system for the production of high-value flavonoid products. Specifically, we leverage the power of microbial polycultures to demonstrate, for the first time, the de novo production of flavan-3-ols and anthocyanidin-3-O-glucosides in microbial hosts (Fig. 1). To accomplish this task, we built upon our previous coculture demonstration (9) by developing a phenylpropanoic acid production module capable of the highest-titer production of p-coumaric and caffeic acids to date. Combining this module with the previously developed C5 and p168 modules (9) enabled production of 26.1 mg/liter (+)-afzelechin from glucose. Finally, we further demonstrate the modularity of our system through production of anthocyanidin-3-O-glucosides from glucose by introduction of a fourth module for anthocyanin production to the system, resulting in a de novo titer of 9.5 ± 0.6 mg/liter pelargonidin-3-O-glucoside (callistephin), the predominant red pigment in strawberries (15). Critically, this production was obtained with only minimal fermentation optimization at the polyculture level. This work exemplifies the potential of mixed cultures to expand what is currently attainable for metabolic engineering applications and lays the groundwork for the development of more complex, higher-order polyculture communities capable of reconstituting extensive natural product pathways in nonnatural hosts.

FIG 1 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1 

Polyculture schematic representing the realized 4-strain polyculture. Inclusion of a fifth strain shows the potential for extension through addition of sequential modules.

RESULTS

Expanding upon previous coculture efforts, the development of two additional bioconversion modules has been accomplished to realize the de novo production of both flavan-3-ols and anthocyanidin-3-O-glucosides for the first time outside of plants.

Development of TAL module.Significant efforts have been focused on improving the de novo production of phenylpropanoic acids in Escherichia coli. Similar endeavors have enabled production of flavan-3-ols and anthocyanins by supplementing phenylpropanoic acids or flavanones, but connection of the entire pathway in microbes has remained elusive (16, 17), possibly due to low outputs of the upstream pathway segments. Recent efforts from two labs have, however, enabled the near-gram-scale de novo production of both p-coumaric and caffeic acids (18, 19). The development of the tyrosine-overproducing E. coli strain rpoA14(DE3) represents a major milestone for the de novo production of phenylpropanoic acids (20, 21), while the discovery and optimization of the natively silenced E. coli non-P450 hydroxylase HpaBC enabled, for the first time, efficient production of caffeic acid through the ortho-hydroxylation of p-coumaric acid (18, 22–24). Building off of these efforts, we first set out to develop a phenylpropanoic acid production module that was compatible with our previously described “C5” and “p168” modules to enable the de novo production of flavan-3-ols in vivo (9).

To accomplish this task, we collected the most efficient plasmids and strains from recent literature reports (18, 20, 25) and, along with several plasmids constructed in our lab, built 28 strain-plasmid combinations for screening of phenylpropanoic acid production (Table 1). Of the 28 strains, 20 were designed for p-coumaric acid production (tyrosine ammonia lyase [TAL] overexpression), while the remaining 8 were targeted for caffeic acid production (TAL and HpaBC overexpression). The effect of the endogenous gene supplementation plasmid pCS-TPTA was also tested but did not show significant titer improvements for any of the tested combinations (Fig. 2). This is in contrast with previous findings (18, 24); however, it is important to note that the screening was not completed under identical conditions. From the strain combinations, strain R4 represented the best p-coumaric acid producer, while strain R2 was selected as the best caffeic acid producer. It is interesting to note that neither R2 nor R4 represents a strain configuration that had been previously published, indicating that significant improvements can be attained through basic literature review and combinatorial screening of available modules.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1 

Phenylpropanoic acid production modules assessed in this work

FIG 2 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2 

Screening of phenylpropanoic acid production modules. Initial screening was completed under optimal conditions for C5 and p168 coculture (9) (AMM–2% glycerol, 5-h induction point, 30°C fermentation temperature postinduction with 1 mM IPTG). Constitutive expression modules (Q11 to Q14 and R11 to R14) did not require induction with IPTG. The titers reported are after 2 days of cultivation in 48-well plates.

Optimization of phenylpropanoic acid production.Three p-coumaric acid production strains (R4, R11, and R13) and one caffeic acid production strain (R2) from the initial screen were subjected to further optimization to determine the full potential of these modules in monoculture. Through course optimization of the induction point, inducer concentration, production temperature, and carbon source, the highest-titer production to date was realized for both p-coumaric and caffeic acids at 2.51 ± 0.03 and 1.03 ± 0.02 g/liter, respectively (Fig. 3). The production of p-coumaric acid was found to be highly sensitive to nearly all optimization parameters, with the highest titer achieved using glycerol as a primary carbon source (Fig. 3). Interestingly, caffeic acid production by strain R2 was found to be relatively insensitive to all factors. The titers presented here represent 157% and 34% improvements for p-coumaric and caffeic acid, respectively, over the highest titers reported in the literature to date (18, 19). Significant black coloration, indicative of polymeric melanin formation through the l-3,4-dihydroxyphyenylalanine (l-DOPA) intermediate, was observed from all caffeic production modules both on solid as well as in liquid media. This observation is consistent with current literature and is assumed to be the primary factor limiting caffeic acid production (26, 27). Future efforts to scale up to fed-batch fermentation are under way to further improve phenylpropanoic acid titers, yields, and productivity.

FIG 3 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3 

Analysis of top phenylpropanoic acid production modules. (a) Glucose carbon source at 37°C with induction for 3 h (R2 and R4 only). (b) Glycerol carbon source at 37°C with induction for 8 h (R2 and R4 only).

Production of flavan-3-ols de novo.Combining the previously published coculture system for the efficient production of flavan-3-ols from phenylpropanoic acids with the best phenylpropanoic acid production module described above enables the production of flavan-3-ols from glucose. Highlighting the drop-in modularity of polyculture systems, we conserved the previously optimized ratio of C5 to p168 of 8:2 (9) and varied only the proportion of the TAL module over several induction points in the range of the predicted optimum from previous work. Using this optimization strategy, we were able to demonstrate the de novo production of afzelechin for the first time in a microbial host (Fig. 4). Furthermore, we achieved production titers of 26.1 ± 0.8 mg/liter without extensive optimization. These successes supported the further expansion of flavonoid production using the polyculture platform.

FIG 4 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4 

Production landscape of three-strain polyculture for the de novo production of (+)-afzelechin. All data were obtained in AMM-glucose medium at a production temperature of 30°C. Error bars represent 1 standard deviation from at least biological duplicate.

Production of anthocyanidin-3-O-glucosides de novo.Our previous successes using polycultures for the production of flavonoids motivated the further application of this technology to expand what is currently possible in vivo. Previous efforts in our lab have developed strains capable of high-titer anthocyanidin-3-O-glucoside production from flavan-3-ols, but efforts to further connect the pathway with the upstream phenylpropanoic acid precursors have not been successful. Building off of these efforts, we selected the previously characterized pETM6-3GT-ANS plasmid for the expression of our flavan-3-ol–to–anthocyanin bioconversion pathway (28). Transformation of this plasmid into our baseline host BL21star(DE3) resulted in our “Antho” module to be combined with the previously described TAL, C5, and p168 modules for the de novo production of anthocyanidin-3-O-glucosides in vivo. In a similar fashion as before, the previously determined optimum ratio of 8:8:2 TAL to C5 to p168) was conserved, with the fraction of the new module being varied to result in the first account of a functional synthetic four-strain polyculture. This microbial consortium enabled, for the first time outside of plants, the production of the anthocyanidin-3-O-glucoside callistephin from glucose (Fig. 5).

FIG 5 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5 

Production of anthocyanidin-3-O-glucosides from glucose using a four-strain polyculture. All data were obtained using a 5-h induction point and 30°C induction temperature. Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation from the mean of biological quadruplicates. All differences between MatBC and no-MatBC pairs are statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Addition of two additional enzyme overexpressions, MatBC, to the previously published C5 module further highlights the flexibility of the polyculture platform for rapid expansion and modification. These enzymes enable the uptake of externally supplemented malonate and subsequent activation to malonyl coenzyme A (malonyl-CoA), a key and limiting substrate for the chalcone synthase (CHS) enzyme (29). Significantly higher production (P < 0.05) of callistephin from glucose was achieved across a wide range of inoculation ratios, while conserving the optimum fermentation conditions from previous experiments.

DISCUSSION

The rapid success of polycultures to realize the de novo production of various late-pathway flavonoid metabolites demonstrates the power of such approaches over traditional monoculture metabolic engineering efforts (30, 31). Additionally, the ease with which these pathways were reoptimized through conservation of the previously optimized inoculation ratio further highlights the benefits of polyculture modularity over that of traditional monoculture techniques (31). In traditional monoculture techniques, extension of the current heterologous overexpression pathway would require additional genes to be cloned and expressed in the previously optimized strain, consequently deoptimizing the strain from both a genetic and fermentation perspective. Genetic reoptimization is a cumbersome task. Oftentimes, it is impossible to regain the fluxes previously achieved due to either increased metabolic burden (32) or altered natural precursor and cofactor availability, thus limiting the overall titer, yield, and productivity of the process. Polycultures, however, enable the genetic optimization of each module to be preserved, requiring only minor fermentation optimization to adjust the inoculation ratio of the new strain (14). The simplicity of this optimization and the smooth trends observed in corresponding production landscapes support the hypothesis that these cultures are relatively stable through the production phase of the fermentation.

These positive polyculture attributes, however, are not gained without associated costs. The feasibility of our polyculture system hinges on the ability of the intermodule metabolites to be efficiently transported between strains. In the present study, no transporter engineering was required to achieve a functioning system. Careful selection of the pathway division points (e.g., avoiding CoA intermediates as intermodule metabolites) is key to minimizing difficulty in this area. We do envision future applications, especially with products that are membrane associated or lipophilic, where significant effort will need to be performed to ensure transport to and from strain modules. Additionally, in systems where transport must be engineered, this limitation can also be used as an advantage to limit substrate availability to promiscuous enzymes in off-target strain modules.

We have shown high sensitivity to small (less than 5%) changes in initial community composition, which readily facilitates fine-tuning of consortium productivity but could also lead to many unknowns upon scale-up to fed-batch, high-cell-density cultures. Additionally, as subsequent microbial modules are appended to the polyculture, its further expansion is limited by a fixed total biomass to be distributed across all modules. This shortcoming of polyculture-based strategies is minimized when an obvious rate-limiting module is identified, but it can be more pronounced when multiple limiting/bottlenecking modules exist and deplete space available for the more efficient modules in the pathway. Despite these limitations, we have demonstrated the ability of our polyculture-based approach to outperform previously reported efforts to enable the de novo production of high-value specialty flavonoids and anthocyanin chemicals.

Conclusion.In conclusion, we have constructed and demonstrated the scalability of a high-titer phenylpropanoic acid module that has potential for commercial value if scaled further to a bioreactor. Utilizing this module along with the previously published modules (C5 and p168), we demonstrate the de novo production of flavan-3-ols for the first time outside of the native plant hosts. Further expanding on this polyculture theme, we incorporated a fourth module (Antho) containing the anthocyanadin synthase (ANS) and 3-O-glycosyltransferase (3GT) genes. Using all four modules, we also showcased, for the first time outside of plants, the production of the anthocyanidin-3-O-glucoside callistephin from glucose. This complicated feat was facilitated by the modularity of the polyculture platform, which conserves the genetic optimization of each module and only requires basic fermentation optimization to achieve peak production. The use of this polyculture-based approach has enabled a system complexity only rivaled by a few other success stories in the metabolic engineering literature (33, 34). Our overexpression of 15 unique heterologous or modified (feedback-resistant) enzymes has enabled the de novo production of anthocyanins at titers several orders of magnitude higher than those in studies with similar numbers of overexpressed enzymes sourced from eukaryotic organisms. Additionally, the consortium-based approach presented in this proof-of-principle study is not limited to flavonoids but in principle could be applied to a variety of other high-value natural and synthetic products. In summary, coculture and polyculture techniques have demonstrated their potential to rapidly expand what is deemed to be possible with metabolic engineering, but this power comes with additional complexities that must be systematically addressed to achieve the highest titers, yields, and productivities possible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, vectors, and media. E. coli DH5α was used to propagate all plasmids. BL21star(DE3), BL21star(DE3)ΔsucC ΔfumC (35), rpoA14(DE3) (20), and QH4 (18) were used as the hosts for flavonoid production. The expression vectors pETM6 and pXPA were the basis for all plasmid construction and pathway expression. Luria broth (LB) Lennox modification (Sigma) and Andrew’s Magic medium (AMM) (36) were used where noted. All plasmid constructs will be made available through addgene.org.

Plasmid construction.Preexisting flavonoid modules were used directly or with slight modification for this work. All plasmids used are summarized in Table S1 in the supplemental material, and all plasmid modifications are described below. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed to silently remove an internal NdeI restriction site from the open reading frame of Rhodotorula glutinis tyrosine ammonia lyase (RgTALsyn) on pTrc-RgTALsyn (20) using standard methods and primers 3 to 4 (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). The mutagenized RgTALsyn was PCR amplified from pTrc-RgTALsyn using primers 1 to 2 (Table S2). The resulting PCR product was digested (FastDigest; Thermo Scientific) with NdeI and SpeI, gel purified (EZNA MicroElute gel extraction kit; Omega Bio-Tek), and ligated with pETM6 backbone also digested with NdeI and SpeI and gel extracted using standard methods to create pETM6-RgTALsyn (no. 10 in Table S1). The corresponding plasmid was sequence verified (Genewiz, Inc.) and used together with pETM6-HpaBC (no. 12 in Table S1) (22) to create pETM6-RgTALsyn-HpaB-HpaC through standard ePathBrick cloning protocols (37).

TABLE S1 

Strains and plasmids used in this study. Download TABLE S1, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2017 Jones et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

TABLE S2 

Primers used in this study. Download TABLE S2, DOCX file, 0.04 MB.
Copyright © 2017 Jones et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

We replaced the T7-lac feature on pETM6 with the PxylA promoter from Bacillus megaterium found on the commercial vector pMM1522 (Mobitec) to create the constitutive expression plasmid pXylA. The PxylA promoter, although xylose inducible in B. megaterium, was shown previously to be constitutively expressed in E. coli (38). To this end, a gBlock (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. [sequence available in Text S1 in the supplemental material]) was synthesized containing the multiple-cloning site (MCS) of pETM6 under the control of the PxylA promoter sequence, flanked by AvrII and SpeI restriction sites on the 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively. The PxylA fragment was then cloned into pETM6 and sequence verified. Two constitutive TAL expression plasmids were obtained by subcloning RgTALsyn from pETM6-RgTALsyn into pXylA and replacing enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) in pXPA-FapO-eGFP (PGAP promoter) (39) at restriction sites NdeI and SpeI using standard methods.

TEXT S1 

gBlock sequence for cloning pXylA. Download TEXT S1, DOCX file, 0.05 MB.
Copyright © 2017 Jones et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

Fermentation protocol.The small-scale cultivation protocol was adapted from Jones et al. (9) with only minor modification. Except where noted, the cultures were grown in AMM with 20 g/liter glucose as the primary carbon source. The cultures were first grown at 37°C and transitioned to 30°C upon induction with 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside). In the case of the phenylpropanoic acid production strains, 125-ml nonbaffled shake flasks containing 25 ml of medium were used to confirm small-scale screening studies, allow for more frequent sampling, and limit evaporation effects on final titer.

Metabolite analysis.Analysis methods were slightly adapted from Jones et al. (9). A 25-μl injection was used for all polyculture fermentations. Analysis of phenylpropanoic acid titers in monoculture required a 10-fold dilution of culture broth and a 5-μl injection volume to reach the linear region for UV detection. Absorbance at 280 nm was monitored in all cases, except for anthocyanidin-3-O-glucosides, where 518 nm was used. A representative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatogram for anthocyanin quantification is shown in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material. Product titers were determined using authentic standards, while (+)-afzelechin was quantified using the (+)-catechin standard curve in accordance with previous literature, because (+)-afzelechin is not commercially available (22, 40). All experiments were performed in at least biological duplicate, with key high-titer conditions reproduced in biological and experimental triplicate. Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation from the mean. Significance of data was determined using a two-tailed unpaired t test with a 95% confidence interval.

FIG S1 

HPLC chromatogram for callistephin quantification. Traces for the commercially available standard (Std) and 4-strain polyculture supernatant are shown. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.2 MB.
Copyright © 2017 Jones et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

J.A.J., B.F.C., and M.A.G.K. designed the study and wrote the draft. J.A.J., V.R.V., S.M.C., A.N.S., Y.X., J.A.E., B.F.C., and C.M.C. performed and analyzed the experiments with input from R.J.L., R.A.G., and M.A.G.K. All authors edited and revised the manuscript.

As a potential conflict of interest, J.A.J. and M.A.G.K. have filed a patent (U.S. patent application no. 15/341,911) on the use of microbial polycultures for high-value chemical production.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 14 April 2017
    • Accepted 19 May 2017
    • Published 6 June 2017
  • Copyright © 2017 Jones et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hays SG,
    2. Patrick WG,
    3. Ziesack M,
    4. Oxman N,
    5. Silver PA
    . 2015. Better together: engineering and application of microbial symbioses. Curr Opin Biotechnol36:40–49. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2015.08.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lindemann SR,
    2. Bernstein HC,
    3. Song HS,
    4. Fredrickson JK,
    5. Fields MW,
    6. Shou W,
    7. Johnson DR,
    8. Beliaev AS
    . 2016. Engineering microbial consortia for controllable outputs. ISME J10:2077–2084. doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.26.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Grosskopf T,
    2. Soyer OS
    . 2014. Synthetic microbial communities. Curr Opin Microbiol18:72–77. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2014.02.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hatcher BG
    . 1997. Coral reef ecosystems: how much greater is the whole than the sum of the parts?Coral Reefs16:S77–S91. doi:10.1007/s003380050244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Teague B,
    2. Weiss R
    . 2015. Synthetic communities, the sum of parts. Science349:924–925. doi:10.1126/science.aad0876.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brown EJ,
    2. Pignatello JJ,
    3. Martinson MM,
    4. Crawford RL
    . 1986. Pentachlorophenol degradation: a pure bacterial culture and an epilithic microbial consortium. Appl Environ Microbiol52:92–97.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Olson JB,
    2. Steppe TF,
    3. Litaker RW,
    4. Paerl HW
    . 1998. N2-fixing microbial consortia associated with the ice cover of Lake Bonney, Antarctica. Microb Ecol36:231–238. doi:10.1007/s002489900110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Rabaey K,
    2. Boon N,
    3. Siciliano SD,
    4. Verhaege M,
    5. Verstraete W
    . 2004. Biofuel cells select for microbial consortia that self-mediate electron transfer. Appl Environ Microbiol70:5373–5382. doi:10.1128/AEM.70.9.5373-5382.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Jones JA,
    2. Vernacchio VR,
    3. Sinkoe AL,
    4. Collins SM,
    5. Ibrahim MHA,
    6. Lachance DM,
    7. Hahn J,
    8. Koffas MAG
    . 2016. Experimental and computational optimization of an Escherichia coli co-culture for the efficient production of flavonoids. Metab Eng35:55–63. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2016.01.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Pereira B,
    3. Li Z,
    4. Stephanopoulos G
    . 2015. Engineering Escherichia coli coculture systems for the production of biochemical products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A112:8266–8271. doi:10.1073/pnas.1506781112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Li Z,
    3. Pereira B,
    4. Stephanopoulos G
    . 2015. Engineering E. coli-E. coli cocultures for production of muconic acid from glycerol. Microb Cell Fact14:134. doi:10.1186/s12934-015-0319-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Zhou K,
    2. Qiao K,
    3. Edgar S,
    4. Stephanopoulos G
    . 2015. Distributing a metabolic pathway among a microbial consortium enhances production of natural products. Nat Biotechnol33:377–383. doi:10.1038/nbt.3095.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Willrodt C,
    2. Hoschek A,
    3. Bühler B,
    4. Schmid A,
    5. Julsing MK
    . 2015. Coupling limonene formation and oxyfunctionalization by mixed-culture resting cell fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng112:1738–1750. doi:10.1002/bit.25592.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Wang X
    . 2016. Modular co-culture engineering, a new approach for metabolic engineering. Metab Eng37:114–121. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2016.05.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Bridle P,
    2. García-Viguera C
    . 1997. Analysis of anthocyanins in strawberries and elderberries. A comparison of capillary zone electrophoresis and HPLC. Food Chem59:299–304. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00176-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yan Y,
    2. Kohli A,
    3. Koffas MAG
    . 2005. Biosynthesis of natural flavanones in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol71:5610–5613. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.9.5610-5613.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lim CG,
    2. Wong L,
    3. Bhan N,
    4. Dvora H,
    5. Xu P,
    6. Venkiteswaran S,
    7. Koffas MAG
    . 2015. Development of a recombinant Escherichia coli strain for overproduction of the plant pigment anthocyanin. Appl Environ Microbiol81:6276–6284. doi:10.1128/AEM.01448-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Huang Q,
    2. Lin Y,
    3. Yan Y
    . 2013. Caffeic acid production enhancement by engineering a phenylalanine over-producing Escherichia coli strain. Biotechnol Bioeng110:3188–3196. doi:10.1002/bit.24988.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kang SY,
    2. Choi O,
    3. Lee JK,
    4. Hwang BY,
    5. Uhm TB,
    6. Hong YS
    . 2012. Artificial biosynthesis of phenylpropanoic acids in a tyrosine overproducing Escherichia coli strain. Microb Cell Fact11:153. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-11-153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Santos CNS,
    2. Koffas M,
    3. Stephanopoulos G
    . 2011. Optimization of a heterologous pathway for the production of flavonoids from glucose. Metab Eng13:392–400. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2011.02.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Santos CNS
    . 2010. Combinatorial search strategies for the metabolic engineering of microorganisms. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jones JA,
    2. Collins SM,
    3. Vernacchio VR,
    4. Lachance DM,
    5. Koffas MA
    . 2016. Optimization of naringenin and p-coumaric acid hydroxylation using the native E. coli hydroxylase complex, HpaBC. Biotechnol Prog32:21–25. doi:10.1002/btpr.2185.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Lin Y,
    2. Yan Y
    . 2014. Biotechnological production of plant-specific hydroxylated phenylpropanoids. Biotechnol Bioeng111:1895–1899. doi:10.1002/bit.25237.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lin Y,
    2. Yan Y
    . 2012. Biosynthesis of caffeic acid in Escherichia coli using its endogenous hydroxylase complex. Microb Cell Fact11:42. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-11-42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Stephanopoulos G
    . 2013. Engineering E. coli for caffeic acid biosynthesis from renewable sugars. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol97:3333–3341. doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4544-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Santos CNS,
    2. Stephanopoulos G
    . 2008. Melanin-based high-throughput screen for l-tyrosine production in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol74:1190–1197. doi:10.1128/AEM.02448-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Lagunas-Muñoz VH,
    2. Cabrera-Valladares N,
    3. Bolívar F,
    4. Gosset G,
    5. Martínez A
    . 2006. Optimum melanin production using recombinant Escherichia coli. J Appl Microbiol101:1002–1008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03013.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Cress BF,
    2. Leitz QD,
    3. Kim DC,
    4. Amore TD,
    5. Suzuki JY,
    6. Linhardt RJ,
    7. Koffas MAG
    . 2017. CRISPRi-mediated metabolic engineering of E. coli for O-methylated anthocyanin production. Microb Cell Fact16:10. doi:10.1186/s12934-016-0623-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Leonard E,
    2. Yan Y,
    3. Fowler ZL,
    4. Li Z,
    5. Lim CG,
    6. Lim KH,
    7. Koffas MAG
    . 2008. Strain improvement of recombinant Escherichia coli for efficient production of plant flavonoids. Mol Pharm5:257–265. doi:10.1021/mp7001472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Jones JA,
    2. Toparlak ÖD,
    3. Koffas MA
    . 2015. Metabolic pathway balancing and its role in the production of biofuels and chemicals. Curr Opin Biotechnol33:52–59. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Jones JA,
    2. Koffas MAG
    . 2016. Optimizing metabolic pathways for the improved production of natural products. Methods Enzymol575:179–193. doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2016.02.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Wu G,
    2. Yan Q,
    3. Jones JA,
    4. Tang YJ,
    5. Fong SS,
    6. Koffas MAG
    . 2016. Metabolic burden: cornerstones in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering applications. Trends Biotechnol34:652–664. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Smanski MJ,
    2. Bhatia S,
    3. Zhao D,
    4. Park Y,
    5. Woodruff LBA,
    6. Giannoukos G,
    7. Ciulla D,
    8. Busby M,
    9. Calderon J,
    10. Nicol R,
    11. Gordon DB,
    12. Densmore D,
    13. Voigt CA
    . 2014. Functional optimization of gene clusters by combinatorial design and assembly. Nat Biotechnol32:1241–1249. doi:10.1038/nbt.3063.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Galanie S,
    2. Thodey K,
    3. Trenchard IJ,
    4. Filsinger Interrante M,
    5. Smolke CD
    . 2015. Complete biosynthesis of opioids in yeast. Science349:1095–1100. doi:10.1126/science.aac9373.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Xu P,
    2. Ranganathan S,
    3. Fowler ZL,
    4. Maranas CD,
    5. Koffas MA
    . 2011. Genome-scale metabolic network modeling results in minimal interventions that cooperatively force carbon flux towards malonyl-CoA. Metab Eng13:578–587. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2011.06.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. He W,
    2. Fu L,
    3. Li G,
    4. Jones JA,
    5. Linhardt RJ,
    6. Koffas M
    . 2015. Production of chondroitin in metabolically engineered E. coli. Metab Eng27:92–100. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.11.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Xu P,
    2. Vansiri A,
    3. Bhan N,
    4. Koffas MAG
    . 2012. ePathBrick: a synthetic biology platform for engineering metabolic pathways in E. coli. ACS Synth Biol1:256–266. doi:10.1021/sb300016b.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Knobloch D,
    2. Clemens A,
    3. Ostermann K,
    4. Rödel G
    . 2011. The xylA promoter of Bacillus megaterium mediates constitutive gene expression in Escherichia coli. Eng Life Sci11:458–462. doi:10.1002/elsc.201000225.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. Xu P,
    2. Li L,
    3. Zhang F,
    4. Stephanopoulos G,
    5. Koffas M
    . 2014. Improving fatty acids production by engineering dynamic pathway regulation and metabolic control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A111:11299–11304. doi:10.1073/pnas.1406401111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Zhao S,
    2. Jones JA,
    3. Lachance DM,
    4. Bhan N,
    5. Khalidi O,
    6. Venkataraman S,
    7. Wang Z,
    8. Koffas MAG
    . 2015. Improvement of catechin production in Escherichia coli through combinatorial metabolic engineering. Metab Eng28:43–53. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2014.12.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Complete Biosynthesis of Anthocyanins Using E. coli Polycultures
J. Andrew Jones, Victoria R. Vernacchio, Shannon M. Collins, Abhijit N. Shirke, Yu Xiu, Jacob A. Englaender, Brady F. Cress, Catherine C. McCutcheon, Robert J. Linhardt, Richard A. Gross, Mattheos A. G. Koffas
mBio Jun 2017, 8 (3) e00621-17; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00621-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Complete Biosynthesis of Anthocyanins Using E. coli Polycultures
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Complete Biosynthesis of Anthocyanins Using E. coli Polycultures
J. Andrew Jones, Victoria R. Vernacchio, Shannon M. Collins, Abhijit N. Shirke, Yu Xiu, Jacob A. Englaender, Brady F. Cress, Catherine C. McCutcheon, Robert J. Linhardt, Richard A. Gross, Mattheos A. G. Koffas
mBio Jun 2017, 8 (3) e00621-17; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00621-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

anthocyanins
Bacteriological Techniques
Escherichia coli
metabolic engineering
Escherichia coli
anthocyanins
coculture
de novo
flavonoids
pelargonidin 3-O-glucoside
polyculture
recombinant production

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511