Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Editor's Pick Research Article

The Assimilation of Diazotroph-Derived Nitrogen by Scleractinian Corals Depends on Their Metabolic Status

Vanessa N. Bednarz, Renaud Grover, Jean-François Maguer, Maoz Fine, Christine Ferrier-Pagès
Douglas G. Capone, Editor
Vanessa N. Bednarz
a Marine Department, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Principality of Monaco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renaud Grover
a Marine Department, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Principality of Monaco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-François Maguer
b LEMAR-UMR 6539 UBO/CNRS/IRD, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, Plouzané, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maoz Fine
c The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
d The Interuniversity Institute for Marine Science, Eilat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Ferrier-Pagès
a Marine Department, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Principality of Monaco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas G. Capone
University of Southern California
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02058-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Tropical corals are associated with a diverse community of dinitrogen (N2)-fixing prokaryotes (diazotrophs) providing the coral an additional source of bioavailable nitrogen (N) in oligotrophic waters. The overall activity of these diazotrophs changes depending on the current environmental conditions, but to what extent it affects the assimilation of diazotroph-derived N (DDN) by corals is still unknown. Here, in a series of 15N2 tracer experiments, we directly quantified DDN assimilation by scleractinian corals from the Red Sea exposed to different environmental conditions. We show that DDN assimilation strongly varied with the corals’ metabolic status or with phosphate availability in the water. The very autotrophic shallow-water (~5 m) corals showed low or no DDN assimilation, which significantly increased under elevated phosphate availability (3 µM). Corals that depended more on heterotrophy (i.e., bleached and deep-water [~45 m] corals) assimilated significantly more DDN, which contributed up to 15% of the corals’ N demand (compared to 1% in shallow corals). Furthermore, we demonstrate that a substantial part of the DDN assimilated by deep corals was likely obtained from heterotrophic feeding on fixed N compounds and/or diazotrophic cells in the mucus. Conversely, in shallow corals, the net release of mucus, rich in organic carbon compounds, likely enhanced diazotroph abundance and activity and thereby the release of fixed N to the pelagic and benthic reef community. Overall, our results suggest that DDN assimilation by corals varies according to the environmental conditions and is likely linked to the capacity of the coral to acquire nutrients from seawater.

IMPORTANCE Tropical corals are associated with specialized bacteria (i.e., diazotrophs) able to transform dinitrogen (N2) gas into a bioavailable form of nitrogen, but how much of this diazotroph-derived nitrogen (DDN) is assimilated by corals under different environmental conditions is still unknown. Here, we used 15N2 labeling to trace the fate of DDN within the coral symbiosis. We show that DDN is assimilated by both the animal host and the endosymbiotic algae. In addition, the amount of assimilated DDN was significantly greater in mesophotic, bleached, or phosphorus-enriched corals than in surface corals, which almost did not take up this nitrogen form. DDN can thus be of particular importance for the nutrient budget of corals whenever they are limited by the availability of other forms of dissolved nutrients.

INTRODUCTION

Corals are multipartite symbiotic organisms (holobionts) formed by the coral host and a diverse microbiota consisting of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates, endolithic algae, bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses (1, 2). The associated microbial community is specific to both the coral species and the microhabitat within the coral host (i.e., surface mucus layer, coral tissue, and coral skeleton); this highly diverse coral microbiome provides important services to the coral holobiont, such as nutrient acquisition and recycling or antimicrobial defense, among many others (3–5).

Nutrient, especially nitrogen (N), acquisition is of particular importance for corals thriving in oligotrophic reef waters, where N availability often limits primary productivity (6). Corals have therefore evolved an efficient internal recycling of N between the coral host and its dinoflagellate symbionts (7). Model calculations suggest that the symbiotic dinoflagellates can acquire up to 80% of their N from the animal host, indicating that recycling of the internal N pool plays a key role in holobiont functioning (8). Nevertheless, corals also require external N resources to match carbon (C) uptake and sustain net growth, which is gained via heterotrophic consumption of plankton by the coral host (9, 10), via dissolved inorganic N uptake by the dinoflagellates (11), as well as via the association with dinitrogen (N2)-fixing microbes (diazotrophs). A wide variety of diazotrophs has been discovered within the surface mucus layer, or the coral tissue, and skeleton, each harboring a distinct diazotrophic community (12, 13). Studies that used the natural δ15N signature of coral tissue demonstrated qualitatively that diazotroph-derived N (DDN) was assimilated by the coral when the δ15N signature of the coral was close to the δ15N value (0‰) of atmospheric N2 (14, 15). Other studies have quantitatively measured the N2 fixation activity of coral-associated diazotrophs (15–22). Most of these studies used the acetylene reduction assay that measures the nitrogenase activity of diazotrophs indirectly (15–19, 21). However, this approach does not provide quantitative insight into the net assimilation of DDN by the coral host or dinoflagellates. Instead, the use of labeled 15N2 gas measures net N2 fixation directly, thus allowing tracing of the fate and assimilation of DDN within the different coral compartments. So far, only two studies have applied the 15N2 technique to tropical scleractinian coral species (22, 23). The first study, which used the gas bubble method to enrich seawater with 15N2, found 15N enrichment only in the suspended particles of the incubation medium (i.e., particles released by the coral) and not within the coral tissue or dinoflagellates (22). Heterotrophic diazotrophs were thus mainly active in the coral-surrounding seawater, likely benefiting from the high availability of organic C contained in the mucus and released by corals during incubation (24). On the contrary, the second study used the 15N2-enriched seawater addition method and was able to trace DDN assimilation by the dinoflagellates (23). It also experimentally showed that corals could obtain DDN through the ingestion (heterotrophic feeding) of planktonic diazotrophs. The difference between the two studies might be due to the different methods used (15N2 gas bubble versus 15N2-enriched seawater addition), as it was suggested that the gas bubble method could, in some cases, underestimate N2 fixation rates (25, 26). In addition, other environmental factors, such as the diazotroph community composition, the corals’ metabolic status, or the N availability in the environment, may have also been involved.

The corals’ metabolic status (i.e., autotrophic, heterotrophic) is one of the main factors affecting both the rates of mucus release and the rates of organic particle uptake from the surrounding seawater (27). For example, heterotrophy will be high when the autotrophic C input by the symbiotic dinoflagellates is insufficient (i.e., bleached or deep corals [28, 29]). This might subsequently influence the coral’s DDN assimilation since heterotrophy is also linked to the predation of diazotroph particles (23). Both the corals’ metabolic status and the overall activity of coral-associated diazotrophs strongly depend on the current environmental conditions (17, 19, 29, 30), but to the best of our knowledge, no study has directly quantified the assimilation of DDN by corals under different environmental conditions so far. Furthermore, as coral mucus contains a high number of diazotrophs and corals are known to take up diazotrophs from the surrounding seawater (23, 31), the specific role of mucus in providing new bioavailable N to the coral host under different environmental conditions requires further investigation.

Therefore, the present study applied the 15N2-enriched seawater addition method in a series of incubation experiments with scleractinian corals from the northern Red Sea to better understand the importance of DDN assimilation for the coral holobiont. The aims were (i) to quantify DDN assimilation by corals (i.e., animal tissue and dinoflagellates) with different metabolic statuses, i.e., exposed to different environmental conditions (i.e., shallow, deep, bleached, and phosphate-enriched corals) and (ii) to investigate mucus-associated net N2 fixation and its potential contribution to the DDN assimilation by corals.

RESULTS

N2 fixation by suspended particles.All 15N2 incubation experiments resulted in a significant 15N excess enrichment of the suspended particles compared to control samples, to which no 15N tracer was added (Table 1). N2 fixation by suspended particles (ng N liter−1 h−1, Fig. 1) was significantly different among the coral, mucus, and unfiltered seawater incubations (permutational multivariate analysis of variance [PERMANOVA]: pseudo-F5,27 = 42.11, Monte Carlo [MC] test P < 0.001). The lowest N2 fixation rates were observed in the unfiltered seawater control containing the natural community of planktonic diazotrophs (9.80 ± 1.90 ng N liter−1 h−1). As a reminder, in all of the other incubations, the natural community of planktonic diazotrophs was excluded by seawater filtration before the incubations and only the activity of diazotrophs that were associated with the coral mucus or had been expelled by the coral was measured. In this case, suspended particles released during coral incubations [except those with Stylophora pistillata (deep); 26.29 ± 8.96 ng N liter−1 h−1; pairwise MC tests, P > 0.05] and during mucus incubations (deep or shallow) showed significantly enhanced N2 fixation rates compared to natural planktonic diazotrophs of the unfiltered seawater control (pairwise MC tests, P < 0.05, Fig. 1). Highest N2 fixation by suspended particles was observed after incubation of S. pistillata (bleached) with 324.64 ± 64.55 ng N liter−1 h−1. The separate comparison of Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow) revealed significant differences as well (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F1,8 = 19.08, P [MC] = 0.006).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1 

15N excess enrichment of suspended particles, animal tissue, and dinoflagellates exposed to different environmental conditionsa

FIG 1 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1 

N2 fixation by suspended particles (ng N liter−1 h−1; mean ± SE) after incubation of Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow, bleached, and deep) coral colonies (black bars), of coral mucus collected from shallow and deep S. pistillata (gray bars), and of unfiltered seawater samples (white bar). Different letters (a to d) above the bars indicate significant differences between the incubations (one-factor PERMANOVA with pairwise MC tests; significance level, P < 0.05). A separate PERMANOVA was conducted to compare N2 fixation by suspended particles between Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow) incubations.

When N2 fixation by suspended particles was normalized to the coral surface area (ng N cm−2 h−1, Fig. 2A), it showed significant differences between the S. pistillata incubations (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F3,15 = 63.62, P [MC] < 0.001), with the highest rates during the S. pistillata (bleached) incubation and the lowest during the S. pistillata (deep) incubation. Also the comparison of Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow) revealed significant differences (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F1,8 = 19.08, P [MC] = 0.003). Overall, both normalizations gave the same trends.

FIG 2 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2 

N2 fixation by suspended particles (A), as well as DDN assimilation by animal tissue (B) and dinoflagellates (C) after incubation of Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow, 72 h, phosphate, bleached, and deep) coral colonies (ng N cm−2 h−1; mean ± SE). The suspended particles from the S. pistillata (phosphate) incubation were not sampled (n.s.) for analysis. Different letters (a to d) above the bars indicate significant differences between the S. pistillata incubations (one-factor PERMANOVAs with pairwise MC tests; significance level, P < 0.05). A separate PERMANOVA was conducted to compare N2 fixation by suspended particles between Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow) corals (no significant 15N excess enrichment, and thus no DDN assimilation, was detected in the animal tissue and dinoflagellates of these corals).

DDN assimilation in coral tissue and dinoflagellates.The 15N excess enrichment of the dinoflagellates always exceeded that of the animal tissue, but in both coral compartments, it was 10- to 100-fold lower than the enrichment of the suspended particles (Table 1). Compared to the coral controls (no 15N2 exposure), we detected a significant 15N excess enrichment of the coral tissue and dinoflagellates in all 15N2 incubation experiments, except for Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow). Although we detected no 15N excess enrichment of S. pistillata (shallow) after an incubation period of 24 h, the animal tissue and dinoflagellates were significantly enriched after repeated incubation of the corals in 15N2-enriched seawater over 3 consecutive days [S. pistillata (72 h)], indicating slow but continuous DDN assimilation by the corals. Taking the N content of the animal tissue and dinoflagellates into account, the net DDN assimilation into the two coral compartments was calculated (ng N cm−2 h−1). This showed significant differences in DDN assimilation by the corals exposed to different environmental conditions for both the tissue (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F4,18 = 79.08, P [MC] < 0.001, Fig. 2B) and the dinoflagellates (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F4,20 = 19.64, P [MC] < 0.001, Fig. 2C). A significant assimilation in the animal tissue and dinoflagellates was detected in all corals except again in Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow), which showed no 15N excess enrichment. S. pistillata incubated for 72 h presented the lowest DDN assimilation, in both the animal tissue and dinoflagellates. Compared to S. pistillata (72 h), the assimilation significantly increased in the animal tissue of S. pistillata (phosphate), S. pistillata (bleached), and S. pistillata (deep), as well as in the dinoflagellates of S. pistillata (phosphate) and S. pistillata (deep). The highest assimilation was detected in the dinoflagellates of S. pistillata (deep).

Total net N2 fixation.The total net N2 fixation of the coral incubations represents the sum of N2 fixation by suspended particles (normalized to the coral surface area; ng N cm−2 h−1) and the amount of DDN assimilated into the animal tissue and dinoflagellates. It was significantly different between the S. pistillata incubations (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F3,15 = 35.30, P [MC] < 0.001), with the lowest rates for the shallow S. pistillata corals incubated for either 24 h (5.14 ± 0.38 ng N cm−2 h−1) or 72 h (5.21 ± 0.08 ng N cm−2 h−1). Compared to these corals, the total N2 fixation was ~3- and ~2-fold higher in bleached S. pistillata (15.67 ± 0.38 ng N cm−2 h−1) and deep S. pistillata (10.44 ± 1.26 ng N cm−2 h−1), respectively. Furthermore, S. pistillata (72 h) assimilated only ~25% of the total fixed N into the animal tissue and dinoflagellates, while the assimilation increased to ~35% in S. pistillata (bleached) and up to ~90% in S. pistillata (deep).

DISCUSSION

Using 15N2 isotopic labeling, this study provides new insights into the assimilation of DDN by tropical corals exposed to different environmental conditions. The results indicate that DDN assimilation strongly varies with the autotrophic/heterotrophic status of the coral holobiont and with the phosphate availability in seawater, revealing an increased assimilation of DDN by corals that rely more on heterotrophy (i.e., bleached and deep corals) or are exposed to increased phosphate levels. Furthermore, we also demonstrate that mucus can be a major source of new N for the coral host (via feeding on diazotrophs contained in the mucus) and for the coral reef community (via the release of mucus, enriched in diazotrophs and fixed N compounds, to the surrounding seawater).

N2 fixation by suspended particles.N2 fixation by suspended particles quantified in unfiltered seawater samples (containing the natural planktonic diazotroph community) averages 9.80 ± 1.90 ng N liter−1 h−1. This rate is higher than those previously measured in other 15N2-labeling studies (<1.1 ng N liter−1 h−1) for seawater of the northern Gulf of Aqaba (32, 33) but is in the range of those measured (10.8 ± 0.6 ng N liter−1 h−1) in coastal waters of New Caledonia (34). N2 fixation rates vary significantly with the abundance and activity of diazotrophs, themselves depending on environmental factors such as temperature, depth, light, and nutrient and trace metal availability (35). Here we show that N2 fixation rates in coral mucus samples are 12 times as high as those in unfiltered natural seawater (without mucus). This is likely due to a high diazotroph abundance in the mucus, which can be up to 400-fold higher than that in the surrounding seawater (31). Coral mucus is rich in dissolved organic C and inorganic phosphate, which is required for bacterial growth (36, 37). Once released into seawater, it stimulates the activity of both mucus- and seawater-associated bacteria by providing a suitable energy and nutrient source (37–39). Thus, the increased N2 fixation observed in our mucus incubations could be the result of both the net release of diazotrophs into seawater and the stimulation of their activity. Our results are more pronounced than those of Camps et al. (31), who found only an insignificant 2-fold increase in N2 fixation when coral mucus was added to seawater samples. This may result from more active diazotrophs associated with the coral mucus in the present study. Those authors also measured up to 70-fold lower planktonic N2 fixation rates than previous measurements in the same area and season (34), also indicating that planktonic diazotrophs were less active.

During the coral incubations, suspended particles particularly released by the shallow corals showed up to 2-fold higher N2 fixation rates than suspended particles during the mucus-alone incubations (without corals). Corals continuously release approximately half of their photosynthetically acquired C as organic matter into the surrounding seawater (40, 41). This continuous supply of fresh mucus during coral incubations may have further increased the abundance of diazotrophs and stimulated their activity, while the availability of C was likely much reduced during the 24-h incubation with mucus alone. Mucus is indeed rapidly degraded (7 to 10% h−1) by bacteria (42), which, in particular, draw down its content in essential molecules such as phosphate and N (43). Our results are in agreement with the previous findings of Grover et al. (22), who also detected significant rates of N2 fixation by suspended particles released after the incubation of coral colonies, but the rates were much lower than those in the present study. The discrepancies between the two studies might be explained by the use of the 15N2 bubble rather than the 15N2-enriched seawater addition method, but also by seasonal variations (end of summer versus autumn) in diazotroph composition/activity, in the seawater nutrient concentrations, or in the N needs of the coral colonies, respectively. N2 fixation stimulated by corals is indeed highly variable on a seasonal scale, with the highest rates measured during the nutrient-depleted warm summer season (18, 19). We found the highest rates of N2 fixation by suspended particles after the incubation of S. pistillata (bleached). This may result from a higher abundance/activity of mucus-associated diazotrophs and may be linked to an increased release of labile mucus compounds by the coral (44). Interestingly, N2 fixation by suspended particles did not increase when a deep-water coral colony was incubated. Deep corals show reduced photosynthesis rates as a result of decreased light availability (45, 46). This may be accompanied by less C translocation from the symbiotic dinoflagellates to the host and reduced rates of organic matter release, as previously demonstrated in shallow-water corals exposed to reduced light levels (47, 48). Together, these processes may have affected the activity of diazotrophs, leading to decreased N2 fixation rates by suspended particles. In addition, deep corals rely more on heterotrophy because of reduced photosynthesis (46). Increased heterotrophic feeding on organic matter and on diazotrophs in the mucus may all have lowered the amount of fixed N in suspended particles. Also, we detected in deep corals a higher 15N enrichment in both the animal tissue and the dinoflagellates compared to shallow corals (see discussion below). This further supports the idea that deep corals may have assimilated more suspended particles (containing diazotrophs and fixed N) from seawater as a result of increased heterotrophic feeding that, in turn, lowered the amount of fixed N in the suspended particles. Overall, it was suggested that mucus-associated diazotrophs, once released into seawater, provide an additional source of N to the pelagic and benthic reef compartments (31). In addition, our results indicate that this input of N to the coral reef may strongly differ between shallow and deep reef habitats, in relation to the autotrophic or heterotrophic status of corals.

DDN assimilation by shallow-water corals.All corals assimilated DDN into the animal tissue and the dinoflagellates, except for Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow). This confirms the first observations of Grover et al. (22) on tropical corals that, under some conditions, corals do not assimilate fixed N, although this additional N source would be particularly beneficial for shallow corals. Shallow corals receive photosynthetically derived C in excess and are thus N rather than C limited. To cope with this N deficiency, shallow corals have an efficient uptake of dissolved inorganic N from seawater that is energetically fueled by high light availability (49; L. Ezzat and C. Ferrier-Pagès, unpublished data). Although we observed no DDN assimilation by shallow corals after 24 h, S. pistillata (72 h) assimilated approximately 30% of the total fixed N into the animal tissue (0.97 ± 0.14 ng N cm−2 h−1) and dinoflagellates (0.39 ± 0.08 ng N cm−2 h−1) after an incubation period of 72 h. This suggests that assimilation of DDN by shallow corals is a slow process and that N2 fixation is associated with the released coral mucus rather than with the corals, at least in shallow reef environments. A recent study using the 15N2-enriched seawater addition method on shallow S. pistillata corals from New Caledonia detected DDN assimilation exclusively in the dinoflagellates (~330 ng N cm−2 h−1) with assimilation rates up to 3 orders of magnitude higher than in the present study (23). Although both studies used the same incubation technique, different 15N2 enrichment percentages (10% versus 20%) at the start of incubation and different incubation times (4 h versus 24 h) may have affected both the diazotrophic activity and the transfer of DDN into the different coral compartments. Dinoflagellates assimilate ammonium (the end product of N2 fixation) much faster than the coral host (50). Also, Kopp et al. (51) observed a time lag of 6 h between N assimilation by the dinoflagellates and subsequent N translocation to the coral host, suggesting that incubation periods of >4 h are necessary to detect DDN assimilation in the animal tissue. Also, S. pistillata from the Red Sea may be associated with a diazotroph community that is different from or less active than that of corals from New Caledonia. Last, N2 fixation, as well as the assimilation of dissolved inorganic N from the surrounding seawater, can strongly vary with the current environmental conditions (19, 49, 52) and can be a reason for the observed differences. In the following, we provide new insights into DDN assimilation by shallow-water corals exposed to increased phosphate levels in seawater, as well as after bleaching.

(i) Effect of phosphate availability.Phosphate availability in seawater can positively affect the N2 fixation activity of planktonic diazotrophs (53). The high phosphorus demand for N2 fixation can be explained by the high ATP requirements for nitrogenase function, as previously demonstrated on plants (54, 55). This phosphorus constraint can occur either because fixation uniquely requires phosphorus-rich metabolites (56–58) or because fixation allows fixers to grow and thus creates phosphorus demand (59). In addition, it was previously shown for S. pistillata that ammonium uptake from seawater increases up to 2.5-fold in the presence of 0.5 or 3.0 μM phosphate because one nutrient is limiting the use of the other (52). Since ammonium is the final product of N2 fixation, it may explain the up to 5-fold higher DDN assimilation by the coral holobiont when it is exposed to pulses of 3 μM phosphate. Also, N2 fixation can be significantly reduced under low-phosphate conditions (60), and background phosphate levels in the Gulf of Eilat are very low (<0.1 μM) throughout the year (32, 61). This low availability of phosphate in seawater may also explain the significant effect we found on N2 fixation rates upon exposure to 3 μM phosphate. We cannot calculate the total N2 fixation under increased phosphate availability because of the lack of quantification of 15N enrichment in the suspended particles released by the coral. However, total N2 fixation by S. pistillata (phosphate) likely increased since the amount of DDN assimilated in the animal tissue and dinoflagellate compartment of S. pistillata (phosphate) already exceeded the total N2 fixation by S. pistillata (shallow).

(ii) Effect of bleaching.In the present study, incubations of bleached coral colonies revealed the highest total N2 fixation. The N2 fixation by suspended particles in this experiment was twice as high as the N2 fixation by suspended particles in the S. pistillata (shallow) incubation. Also, the DDN assimilation into tissue and dinoflagellates was greatly increased by S. pistillata (bleached) similarly to what was found for S. pistillata (phosphate). This enhanced activity of total (net) N2 fixation is similar to what was recently found for overall (gross) N2 fixation activities in bleached corals with the acetylene reduction assay (30). An increased seawater temperature also increases the abundance and diversity of coral-associated diazotrophs, shifting toward a more heat-resistant diazotroph community (62). Also, the bacterial community associated with the mucus undergoes drastic changes when exposed to heat stress (63). In the present study, 15N2 incubations with S. pistillata (bleached) were conducted after the heat stress period under normal temperature conditions. Thus, increased activity of the nitrogenase enzyme due to higher temperature can be excluded, but the corals most likely experienced a shift in the diazotrophic community that could be one reason for the increased N2 fixation rates seen (62). Furthermore, decreased photosynthesis rates in bleached corals lead to reduced O2 levels in the animal tissue and mucus layer. This, in turn, favors the activity of the O2-sensitive nitrogenase enzyme and can result in increased N2 fixation rates (64). Decreased photosynthesis reduces not only the O2 levels around the corals but also the autotrophic C supply to the host. This makes the coral more dependent on heterotrophic food sources, although the heterotrophic capacity (i.e., grazing) in bleached corals was also found to be impaired. A shift from catching larger high-energy prey items (i.e., nanoflagellates) to smaller low-energy prey (i.e., bacteria and picoflagellates) was observed in bleached S. pistillata because of the reduced energy required for catching nonmotile bacteria (65). Consequently, increased grazing on bacteria from the surrounding water may explain the higher DDN assimilation into the tissue of bleached corals observed here. Moreover, net organic matter fluxes in S. pistillata (bleached) changed from net uptake toward net release likely to reduce the effects of photoinhibition or cell membrane disruption (65–67). Increased release of organic matter can provide additional energy to seawater and mucus-associated diazotrophs, subsequently stimulating their abundance and/or N2 fixation activity in the surrounding water. Overall, the results show not only that total N2 fixation increases in incubations with bleached versus nonbleached corals but also that bleached corals assimilate more DDN. To what extent this additional N is beneficial for the recovery of the coral host after a bleaching event needs further investigation.

DDN assimilation by deep-water corals.Overall, the total N2 fixation was ~2-fold higher in incubations of S. pistillata (deep) than in incubations of S. pistillata (shallow or 72 h). One explanation for the increased N2 fixation activity with depth may be reduced light availability (350 versus 20 μmol m−2 s−1) leading to reduced O2 production via photosynthesis in corals (46). On a diurnal scale, coral-associated N2 fixation was found to be highest during twilight, when O2 production is not too high to inhibit nitrogenase, the enzyme responsible for N2 fixation (68, 69), but high enough for corals to deliver photosynthetic energy to the diazotrophs (15). Thus, the diurnal window with optimal O2 levels for N2 fixation may be greatly increased with increasing water depth, leading to higher N2 fixation rates. Previously, the abundance of scleractinian corals (Montastraea cavernosa, Bahamas) associated with diazotrophs was found to correlate positively with increasing water depth (15). This suggests that the diazotrophic community composition associated with corals may vary with depth and that the assimilation of DDN by corals may increase with depth as well. Also, the natural δ15N isotopic signature of scleractinian corals tends to be depleted as depth increases (70, 71). This can result from the assimilation of isotopically depleted DDN or from the uptake of isotopically depleted nitrate derived from atmospheric deposition, as for the Gulf of Aqaba/Eilat (72, 73). Here we show not only that the total N2 fixation increased in the incubations with deep versus shallow corals but also that deep corals assimilated 80% (8.65 ng N cm−2 h−1) of the total fixed N into the animal tissue or dinoflagellates. In contrast, shallow corals assimilated only 0% or 30% (1.36 ng N cm−2 h−1) of the total fixed N when incubated for 24 or 72 h, respectively. The higher assimilation by deep corals may result from a shift in the heterotrophic status of the coral. Corals in mesophotic reef environments generally rely more on other trophic strategies (i.e., heterotrophy) than their shallow counterparts in order to meet their metabolic demand and to compensate for the reduced photosynthetic C supply from their symbiotic dinoflagellates (45, 74). We found that the DDN assimilation by shallow and deep corals is inversely correlated with the amount of fixed N quantified in suspended particles in the coral incubation. Furthermore, the amount of fixed N in suspended particles was much smaller after the incubation of deep coral colonies than after the incubation alone of mucus extracted from deep coral colonies. This indicates that the high DDN assimilation into the tissue and dinoflagellates of deep corals is derived mainly via increased heterotrophic feeding on suspended particles rich in fixed N and diazotrophs that have been associated with the mucus. Although deep corals are considered to be less N limited by receiving both C and N from heterotrophic sources, they assimilate more DDN than their shallow counterparts. This could be explained by the fact that deep corals are light limited not only for photosynthesis but also for the uptake of dissolved inorganic N (49; Ezzat and Ferrier-Pagès, unpublished). Therefore, the increased DDN assimilation by deep corals may help to compensate for the reduced inorganic N uptake and may be particularly beneficial during periods when organic particles in seawater are insufficient to fully cover their N demand. The ingestion of planktonic free-living diazotrophs can also provide a substantial amount of N to the coral host, even exceeding the N input from coral-associated diazotrophs (23). Thus, it will be interesting to also investigate the importance of planktonic free-living diazotrophs for the N budget of mesophotic corals.

Contribution of DDN to the coral N budget.Tropical corals are generally well adapted to flourish in nutrient-poor waters by efficiently recycling ammonium between the animal host and symbiotic dinoflagellates, by heterotrophic feeding on organic N sources, and by actively scavenging dissolved inorganic N from seawater even at very low dissolved N concentrations. In order to estimate the importance of DDN in relation to other inorganic N sources, we compared the present results with data on rates of inorganic N uptake by corals. The rate of ammonium uptake by S. pistillata at nearly natural ambient concentrations (0.2 μM) was ca. 30 ng N cm−2 h−1, taking into account the animal and dinoflagellate assimilation rates, except for highly fed corals, for which the uptake was lower (49). In addition, the total rate of nitrate uptake by S. pistillata at the same low concentrations was equal to 1.5 ng N cm−2 h−1 (75). Overall, dissolved inorganic N contributes for a mean of 30 to 32 ng N cm−2 h−1, although these rates are an approximation, as they vary with light or temperature levels, as well as with other physicochemical and biological factors. If we assume similar inorganic N uptake rates for all of the corals in the present study, DDN can contribute up to ~1.4 ng N cm−2 h−1 in shallow corals or ca. 5% of the inorganic N uptake. This contribution increases up to ~6 ng N cm−2 h−1 in bleached or phosphate-enriched corals and up to ~9.5 ng N cm−2 h−1 in deep corals, representing ca. 20 and 30% of the inorganic N uptake, respectively. In deep corals, with respect to their reduced inorganic N uptake capacity, this contribution is likely to be higher, underlining the importance of DDN for the N requirements of deep corals in relation to other inorganic N sources. As the ambient inorganic N concentrations on tropical coral reefs are often too low to sustain net growth of the coral holobiont (49), the association with diazotrophs likely serves as additional adaptation of corals to overcome N limitation in oligotrophic reef environments. In order to calculate the contribution of DDN to cover the N demand of deep and shallow corals, we used gross photosynthesis rates, C/N ratios, and assimilation rates of photosynthetically acquired C from previous studies with S. pistillata corals from the Red Sea exposed to high- and low-light conditions (45, 48, 70). This shows that DDN contributes only ~1% of the total N demand of shallow corals, while it can increase up to ~15% in deep corals (Fig. 3). Furthermore, in deep corals, DDN satisfies the N demand of dinoflagellates (~26%) to a greater extent than the N demand of the animal host (~9%), likely because of more efficient DDN assimilation by the former. Dinoflagellates can use N2 fixation products in the form of ammonium much faster than the coral host, as previously demonstrated for ammonium uptake from seawater (50). Instead, the coral host assimilates DDN after the synthesis of host macromolecules deriving from prey digestion or after translocation of recycled DDN by dinoflagellates (23). The higher contribution in deep corals is likely a product of both their higher DDN assimilation and their lower N demand, indicating that deep corals are likely less N limited than shallow corals (76). Overall, the present study shows that DDN can contribute importantly to the overall N budget of mesophotic corals, but whether this additional N is beneficial for the resistance and recovery of deep corals from environmental disturbances requires further investigation.

FIG 3 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3 

Overview of the percent contribution of DDN assimilation to the N demand (ND) of the animal host (CAND), the dinoflagellates (CDND), and the total symbiotic association (CTND) from shallow and deep S. pistillata corals. The ND was calculated from gross photosynthesis (Pgross) measurements (45), from values of C incorporation into the animal host and the dinoflagellates (48), and from C/N ratios (70) of S. pistillata corals at 5- and 50-m water depths in the Red Sea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Coral collection and experimental setup.This study was conducted during November 2014 at the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Science (IUI), northern Gulf of Aqaba/Eilat. By using scuba gear, corals with fragment sizes with a 10- to 30-cm2 surface area were collected from the reef at both 5-m and 40- to 50-m water depths. While light conditions decreased from 200 to 400 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 at 5 m to 20 to 40 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 at 40 to 50 m, the seawater temperature (24.3 ± 0.1°C) and phosphate (338 ± 145 nM) and total dissolved inorganic N (ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate; 507 ± 131 nM) concentrations remained stable throughout the investigated depth range (mean ± standard error [SE]). Environmental data were provided by the Israel National Monitoring Program at the Gulf of Eilat (http://www.iui-eilat.ac.il/Research/NMPMeteoData.aspx ) and represent average values collected during November 2014 at three coastal sampling stations (Taba, Japanese Gardens, Water Control Station) close to our study site.

In total, three different substrates (i.e., unfiltered seawater samples, coral fragments, and coral mucus samples) were collected for the following 15N2 incubation experiments (Table 2). Unfiltered seawater samples (without corals or mucus) were incubated in order to investigate net rates of N2 fixation by the natural planktonic diazotroph community (i.e., particles suspended in seawater). It must be noted that, except in incubations with unfiltered seawater, coral and coral mucus incubations were performed with 0.2-µm-filtered seawater. Therefore, all of the fixed N in the suspended particles of these incubations was derived from coral-associated diazotrophs (probably from bacteria within the mucus layer). For the mucus incubation, six large colonies of S. pistillata were collected from 5-m and 40- to 50-m depths, respectively. Mucus samples were extracted by gently spraying 500 ml of 0.2-µm-filtered seawater onto colonies maintained in air. This mucus mixture was subsequently incubated as described below to investigate rates of N2 fixation by mucus-associated diazotrophs in the absence of corals (i.e., particles suspended in mucus). Mucus samples collected from shallow and deep corals will be referred to as mucus (shallow) and mucus (deep), respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2 

Summary of the different 15N2 incubation experiments conducted with coral fragments, coral mucus, and unfiltered seawater samples to quantify DDN assimilation and/or N2 fixation rates by the different incubated substrates

The coral incubations were used to quantify the assimilation of DDN by animal tissue and dinoflagellates and to investigate net rates of N2 fixation by suspended particles within the incubation medium in the presence of corals. Compared to the mucus incubation, the suspended particles in this experiment represent mucus and other particles continuously released by the coral. Three different sets of corals were collected (Table 2). (i) The first set represents shallow-water corals that were directly incubated (right after sampling) as described below without further treatment. Fragments of Alveopora species (n = 4) and S. pistillata (n = 5) were collected from a 5-m water depth. These fragments will be referred to Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow). Additional S. pistillata fragments (n = 3) from a 5-m depth were incubated for 3 days to determine long-term DDN assimilation. In order not to incubate the corals in the same water for 72 h, the incubation water was renewed every 24 h and filtered for 15N analysis, while the coral fragments were only sampled for 15N analysis at the end of the 3 days. These fragments will be called S. pistillata (72 h). (ii) The second set represents shallow-water corals that were treated as described below prior to the 15N2 incubation experiments. Fragments of S. pistillata collected at a 5-m depth and transferred to six aquaria in outdoor water tables (natural light) with temperature and photosynthetic photon flux density (PFD) sets that corresponded to those found at 5 m. Ambient PFD was obtained by applying layers of black mesh above the tables. The ambient seawater temperature (24 to 25°C) was kept constant by using high rates of seawater renewal in the aquaria. For this set of corals, two treatments were applied in triplicate aquaria (with two fragments per aquarium). Three tanks maintained with a continuous seawater renewal rate of 20% h−1 were submitted to a thermal stress in which the temperature was gradually increased to 30°C for a week (1°C/day) with aquarium heaters connected to electronic controllers. After coral fragments visually bleached [here called S. pistillata (bleached)], the temperature was returned to 25°C within a week for the following incubation experiments. Three other tanks were maintained for 2 days in a closed circuit under elevated phosphate levels achieved by enriching the aquaria with a pulse of 3 µM H2PO4 twice a day [here called S. pistillata (phosphate)]. In the latter condition, the seawater was changed every day and the following incubations were conducted in phosphate-enriched seawater. (iii) The last set represents fragments of mesophotic S. pistillata (n = 5) collected from a 40- to 50-m depth and incubated directly after sampling. These fragments will be called S. pistillata (deep).

15N2 incubation experiments.We used the 15N2-enriched seawater addition method and produced 15N2-enriched seawater prior to the incubation experiment by injection of 10 ml of 15N2 gas (98% Eurisotop) into degassed, 0.2-μm-filtered seawater, followed by vigorous shaking for at least 12 h. This procedure theoretically ensures 90 to 100% 15N2 equilibration (26). Afterward, each coral fragment was individually placed into a 500-ml gas-tight glass bottle completely filled with 450 ml of seawater (0.2 μm filtered) and 50 ml of 15N2-enriched seawater. Additional 500-ml bottles containing either 450 ml of the mucus mixture or 450 ml of the unfiltered seawater were incubated similarly after adding 50 ml of 15N2-enriched seawater. On the basis of the volume of the incubation bottle and the quantity of 15N2-enriched seawater added, this resulted in a theoretical enrichment of ~9.8 atom% 15N in the incubation medium of all bottles, similar to previous 15N2 studies of corals and sponges (22, 31, 77, 78). The addition of 15N2-enriched seawater can potentially contaminate the sample with trace metals that can affect N2 fixation rates, particularly in areas were trace metals are limiting (79). As the Gulf of Aqaba/Eilat is known to receive relatively large amounts of trace metals compared to other areas (80), a potential effect of contamination was considered to be insignificant. All bottles were closed gastight and incubated for 24 h [except for Stylophora (72 h)]. Additional coral, mucus mixture, and unfiltered seawater incubations without 15N2 addition served as control samples (15N background). During the incubations, bottles were continuously shaken in water baths equipped with agitator plates. Water baths were maintained under the right light and temperature conditions as described above by applying the same filters to shade the solar irradiance to the desired level and using temperature controllers.

At the end of the incubation, coral fragments were collected from the chambers, rinsed with filtered seawater to remove their mucus, and stored frozen until 15N analysis of the animal tissue and dinoflagellate fractions. The water of all incubations (coral, mucus, and unfiltered seawater) was filtered onto precombusted (400°C, 4 to 5 h) GF/F filters, and filters were also stored frozen until 15N analysis of suspended particles from the incubation water.

Sample analysis.The coral tissue was completely removed from the skeleton with an air brush and homogenized with a potter tissue grinder. Homogenates were then separated in several centrifugation steps into the animal and algal fractions according to reference 49, and each fraction was subsequently freeze-dried. All GF/F filters were dried in an oven (60°C, 48 h) prior to 15N analysis of the suspended particles. Finally, the organic N content together with its 15N enrichment in the animal tissue, dinoflagellates, and suspended particles was quantified with a mass spectrometer (Delta Plus; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) coupled via a type III interface to a C/N analyzer (Flash EA; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The standard deviation obtained from repeated measurements of control samples was better than 0.5 µg for PN in the range used (5 to 50 µg N) and was <0.0001 atom% for 15N enrichment. The 15N excess enrichment for each sample was calculated with the formula atom% 15Nexcess = (atom% 15Nsample − atom% 15Ncontrol), where atom% 15Nsample is the 15N enrichment of samples after exposure to 15N2-enriched seawater and atom% 15Ncontrol is the natural 15N enrichment of control samples without 15N2 exposure. The atom% 15Nexcess was considered significant when it was at least three times as high as the standard deviation of the atom% 15Ncontrol obtained. We assumed that the 15N enrichment of the animal tissue and dinoflagellates results entirely from the net assimilation of fixed N by the coral (i.e., DDN assimilation). Finally, the net N2 fixation by suspended particles and the DDN assimilation into the different coral compartments were calculated according to reference 81 by the equation net N2 fixation or DDN assimilation = (atom% 15Nexcess/[t × 9.8]) × (μg PNsample/cm2 or liter), where t is the incubation time, 9.8 is the 15N enrichment of the incubation water at the beginning (atom% 15N), and PNsample/cm2 or liter is the particulate N content of the sample at the end of the incubation normalized either per cm2 of coral skeletal surface area or per liter of incubation water. The skeletal surface area of the coral colonies was determined by the wax technique (82).

Statistical analyses.Statistical analyses were carried out with Primer-E version 6 software (83) with the PERMANOVA+ add-on (84). To look for differences in N2 fixation and DDN assimilation by S. pistillata corals exposed to different environmental conditions, one-factor PERMANOVAs based on Euclidian distance were conducted for the individual compartments (suspended particles, animal tissue, and dinoflagellates), as well as for the sum of all three compartments (total N2 fixation). An additional one-factor PERMANOVA was conducted to investigate differences in rates of N2 fixation by suspended particles after incubation of Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow) corals. Type III (partial) sum of squares was used with permutation of residuals under a reduced model (999 permutations). The significance for the main test, as well for the pairwise comparisons, was based on MC tests because of the low number of unique permutations.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank D. Allemand, Director of the Centre Scientifique de Monaco, for scientifique support, and Leïla Ezzat, Dan Tchernov, and the staff of the IUI for help with the experiments and sample analysis. We also thank Sophie Rabouille and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that helped a lot improving the quality of the manuscript.

This study was funded by the Centre Scientifique de Monaco. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 8 November 2016
    • Accepted 15 December 2016
    • Published 10 January 2017
  • Copyright © 2017 Bednarz et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Rohwer F,
    2. Seguritan V,
    3. Azam F,
    4. Knowlton N
    . 2002. Diversity and distribution of coral-associated bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser243:1–10. doi:10.3354/meps243001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ainsworth TD,
    2. Thurber RV,
    3. Gates RD
    . 2010. The future of coral reefs: a microbial perspective. Trends Ecol Evol25:233–240. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rosenberg E,
    2. Koren O,
    3. Reshef L,
    4. Efrony R,
    5. Zilber-Rosenberg I
    . 2007. The role of microorganisms in coral health, disease and evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol5:355–362. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1635.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kimes NE,
    2. van Nostrand JD,
    3. Weil E,
    4. Zhou J,
    5. Morris PJ
    . 2010. Microbial functional structure of Montastraea faveolata, an important Caribbean reef-building coral, differs between healthy and yellow-band diseased colonies. Environ Microbiol12:541–556. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02113.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Krediet CJ,
    2. Ritchie KB,
    3. Paul VJ,
    4. Teplitski M
    . 2013. Coral-associated micro-organisms and their roles in promoting coral health and thwarting diseases. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20122328. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2328.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Howarth RW
    . 1988. Nutrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst19:89–110. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.000513.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Wang JT,
    2. Douglas AE
    . 1999. Essential amino acid synthesis and nitrogen recycling in an alga-invertebrate symbiosis. Mar Biol135:219–222. doi:10.1007/s002270050619.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tanaka Y,
    2. Grottoli AG,
    3. Matsui Y,
    4. Suzuki A,
    5. Sakai K
    . 2015. Partitioning of nitrogen sources to algal endosymbionts of corals with long-term 15N-labelling and a mixing model. Ecol Modell309–310:163–169. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.017.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ayukai T
    . 1995. Retention of phytoplankton and planktonic microbes on coral reefs within the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs14:141–147. doi:10.1007/BF00367231.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Anthony KRN,
    2. Fabricius KE
    . 2000. Shifting roles of heterotrophy and autotrophy in coral energetics under varying turbidity. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol252:221–253. doi:10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00237-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Miller DJ,
    2. Yellowlees D
    . 1989. Inorganic nitrogen uptake by symbiotic marine cnidarians: a critical review. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci237:109–125. doi:10.1098/rspb.1989.0040.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Lema KA,
    2. Willis BL,
    3. Bourne DG
    . 2012. Corals form characteristic associations with symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol78:3136–3144. doi:10.1128/AEM.07800-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. D Ainsworth T,
    2. Krause L,
    3. Bridge T,
    4. Torda G,
    5. Raina JB,
    6. Zakrzewski M,
    7. Gates RD,
    8. Padilla-Gamiño JL,
    9. Spalding HL,
    10. Smith C,
    11. Woolsey ES,
    12. Bourne DG,
    13. Bongaerts P,
    14. Hoegh-Guldberg O,
    15. Leggat W
    . 2015. The coral core microbiome identifies rare bacterial taxa as ubiquitous endosymbionts. ISME J9:2261–2274. doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Yamamuro M,
    2. Kayanne H,
    3. Minagawao M
    . 1995. Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes of primary producers in coral reef ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr40:617–621. doi:10.4319/lo.1995.40.3.0617.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lesser MP,
    2. Falcón LI,
    3. Rodríguez-Román A,
    4. Enríquez S,
    5. Hoegh-Guldberg O,
    6. Iglesias-Prieto R
    . 2007. Nitrogen fixation by symbiotic cyanobacteria provides a source of nitrogen for the scleractinian coral Montastraeacavernosa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser346:143–152. doi:10.3354/meps07008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Shashar N,
    2. Cohen Y,
    3. Loya Y,
    4. Sar N
    . 1994. Nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) in stony corals: evidence for coral-bacteria interactions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser111:259–264. doi:10.3354/meps111259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Rädecker N,
    2. Meyer FW,
    3. Bednarz VN,
    4. Cardini U,
    5. Wild C
    . 2014. Ocean acidification rapidly reduces dinitrogen fixation associated with the hermatypic coral Seriatoporahystrix. Mar Ecol Prog Ser511:297–302. doi:10.3354/meps10912.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bednarz VN,
    2. Cardini U,
    3. van Hoytema N,
    4. Al-Rshaidat MMD,
    5. Wild C
    . 2015. Seasonal variation in dinitrogen fixation and oxygen fluxes associated with two dominant zooxanthellate soft corals from the northern Red Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser519:141–152. doi:10.3354/meps11091.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Cardini U,
    2. Bednarz VN,
    3. Naumann MS,
    4. van Hoytema N,
    5. Rix L,
    6. Foster RA,
    7. Al-Rshaidat MMD,
    8. Wild C
    . 2015. Functional significance of dinitrogen fixation in sustaining coral productivity under oligotrophic conditions. Proc Biol Sci 282:20152257. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.2257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Lesser MP,
    2. Mazel CH,
    3. Gorbunov MY,
    4. Falkowski PG
    . 2004. Discovery of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in corals. Science305:997–1000. doi:10.1126/science.1099128.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Williams WM,
    2. Viner AB,
    3. Broughton WJ
    . 1987. Nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) associated with the living coral Acroporavariabilis. Mar Biol94:531–535. doi:10.1007/BF00431399.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Grover R,
    2. Ferrier-Pagès C,
    3. Maguer JF,
    4. Ezzat L,
    5. Fine M
    . 2014. Nitrogen fixation in the mucus of Red Sea corals. J Exp Biol217:3962–3963. doi:10.1242/jeb.111591.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Benavides M,
    2. Houlbrèque F,
    3. Camps M,
    4. Lorrain A,
    5. Grosso O,
    6. Bonnet S
    . 2016. Diazotrophs: a non-negligible source of nitrogen for the tropical coral Stylophorapistillata. J Exp Biol219:2608–2612. doi:10.1242/jeb.139451.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Riemann L,
    2. Farnelid H,
    3. Steward GF
    . 2010. Nitrogenase genes in non-cyanobacterial plankton: prevalence, diversity and regulation in marine waters. Aquat Microb Ecol61:235–247. doi:10.3354/ame01431.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Großkopf T,
    2. Mohr W,
    3. Baustian T,
    4. Schunck H,
    5. Gill D,
    6. Kuypers MMM,
    7. Lavik G,
    8. Schmitz RA,
    9. Wallace DWR,
    10. LaRoche J
    . 2012. Doubling of marine dinitrogen-fixation rates based on direct measurements. Nature488:361–364. doi:10.1038/nature11338.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Mohr W,
    2. Grosskopf T,
    3. Wallace DW,
    4. LaRoche J
    . 2010. Methodological underestimation of oceanic nitrogen fixation rates. PLoS One5:e12583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012583.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Falkowski PG,
    2. Dubinsky Z,
    3. Muscatine L,
    4. Porter JW
    . 1984. Light and the bioenergetics of a symbiotic coral. BioScience34:705–709. doi:10.2307/1309663.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Anthony KRN,
    2. Hoogenboom MO,
    3. Maynard JA,
    4. Grottoli AG,
    5. Middlebrook R
    . 2009. Energetics approach to predicting mortality risk from environmental stress: a case study of coral bleaching. Funct Ecol23:539–550. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01531.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Grottoli AG,
    2. Rodrigues LJ,
    3. Palardy JE
    . 2006. Heterotrophic plasticity and resilience in bleached corals. Nature440:1186–1189. doi:10.1038/nature04565.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Cardini U,
    2. van Hoytema N,
    3. Bednarz VN,
    4. Rix L,
    5. Foster RA,
    6. Al-Rshaidat MMD,
    7. Wild C
    . 2016. Microbial dinitrogen fixation in coral holobionts exposed to thermal stress and bleaching. Environ Microbiol18:2620–2633. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13385.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Camps M,
    2. Benavides M,
    3. Lema KA,
    4. Bourne DG,
    5. Grosso O,
    6. Bonnet S
    . 2016. Released coral mucus does not enhance planktonic N2 fixation rates. Aquat Microb Ecol77:51–63. doi:10.3354/ame01787.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Foster RA,
    2. Paytan A,
    3. Zehr JP
    . 2009. Seasonality of N2 fixation and nifH gene diversity in the Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Limnol Oceanogr54:219–233. doi:10.4319/lo.2009.54.1.0219.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Rahav E,
    2. Herut B,
    3. Mulholland M,
    4. Belkin N,
    5. Elifantz H,
    6. Berman-Frank I
    . 2015. Heterotrophic and autotrophic contribution to dinitrogen fixation in the Gulf of Aqaba. Mar Ecol Prog Ser522:67–77. doi:10.3354/meps11143.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Bonnet S,
    2. Berthelot H,
    3. Turk-Kubo K,
    4. Fawcett S,
    5. Rahav E,
    6. L'Helguen S,
    7. Berman-Frank I
    . 2015. Dynamics of Ns> fixation and fate of diazotroph-derived nitrogen in a low-nutrient, low-chlorophyll ecosystem: results from the VAHINE mesocosm experiment (New Caledonia). Biogeosciences13:2653–2673. doi:10.5194/bg-13-2653-2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    1. Cardini U,
    2. Bednarz VN,
    3. Foster RA,
    4. Wild C
    . 2014. Benthic N2 fixation in coral reefs and the potential effects of human-induced environmental change. Ecol Evol4:1706–1727. doi:10.1002/ece3.1050.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Van Duyl F,
    2. Gast G
    . 2001. Linkage of small-scale spatial variations in DOC, inorganic nutrients and bacterioplankton growth with different coral reef water types. Aquat Microb Ecol24:17–26. doi:10.3354/ame024017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Nakajima R,
    2. Yoshida T,
    3. Azman BAR,
    4. Zaleha K,
    5. Othman BHR,
    6. Toda T
    . 2009. In situ release of coral mucus by Acropora and its influence on the heterotrophic bacteria. Aquat Ecol43:815–823. doi:10.1007/s10452-008-9210-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Allers E,
    2. Niesner C,
    3. Wild C,
    4. Pernthaler J
    . 2008. Microbes enriched in seawater after addition of coral mucus. Appl Environ Microbiol74:3274–3278. doi:10.1128/AEM.01870-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Naumann MS,
    2. Richter C,
    3. El-Zibdah M,
    4. Wild C
    . 2009. Coral mucus as an efficient trap for picoplanktonic cyanobacteria: implications for pelagic–benthic coupling in the reef ecosystem. Mar Ecol Prog Ser385:65–76. doi:10.3354/meps08073.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Crossland CJ,
    2. Barnes DJ,
    3. Borowitzka MA
    . 1980. Diurnal lipid and mucus production in the staghorn coral Acroporaacuminata. Mar Biol60:81–90. doi:10.1007/BF00389151.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Tremblay P,
    2. Grover R,
    3. Maguer JF,
    4. Legendre L,
    5. Ferrier-Pagès C
    . 2012. Autotrophic carbon budget in coral tissue: a new 13C-based model of photosynthate translocation. J Exp Biol215:1384–1393. doi:10.1242/jeb.065201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Wild C,
    2. Huettel M,
    3. Klueter A,
    4. Kremb SG,
    5. Rasheed MY,
    6. Jørgensen BB
    . 2004. Coral mucus functions as an energy carrier and particle trap in the reef ecosystem. Nature428:66–70. doi:10.1038/nature02344.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Fonvielle JA,
    2. Reynaud S,
    3. Jacquet S,
    4. LeBerre B,
    5. Ferrier-Pagès C
    . 2015. First evidence of an important organic matter trophic pathway between temperate corals and pelagic microbial communities. PLoS One10:e0139175. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Tremblay P,
    2. Weinbauer MG,
    3. Rottier C,
    4. Guérardel Y,
    5. Nozais C,
    6. Ferrier-Pagès C
    . 2011. Mucus composition and bacterial communities associated with the tissue and skeleton of three scleractinian corals maintained under culture conditions. J Mar Biol Assoc91:649–657. doi:10.1017/S002531541000130X.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    1. Mass T,
    2. Einbinder S,
    3. Brokovich E,
    4. Shashar N,
    5. Vago R,
    6. Erez J,
    7. Dubinsky Z
    . 2007. Photoacclimation of Stylophorapistillata to light extremes: metabolism and calcification. Mar Ecol Prog Ser334:93–102. doi:10.3354/meps334093.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. 46.↵
    1. Lesser MP,
    2. Slattery M,
    3. Stat M,
    4. Ojimi M,
    5. Gates RD,
    6. Grottoli A
    . 2010. Photoacclimatization by the coral Montastraeacavernosa in the mesophotic zone: light, food, and genetics. Ecology91:990–1003. doi:10.1890/09-0313.1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Crossland CJ
    . 1987. In situ release of mucus and DOC-lipid from the corals Acroporavariabilis and Stylophorapistillata in different light regimes. Coral Reefs6:35–42. doi:10.1007/BF00302210.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    1. Tremblay P,
    2. Grover R,
    3. Maguer JF,
    4. Hoogenboom M,
    5. Ferrier-Pagès C
    . 2014. Carbon translocation from symbiont to host depends on irradiance and food availability in the tropical coral Stylophorapistillata. Coral Reefs33:1–13. doi:10.1007/s00338-013-1100-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.↵
    1. Grover R,
    2. Maguer JF,
    3. Reynaud-Vaganay S,
    4. Ferrier-Pagès C
    . 2002. Uptake of ammonium by the scleractinian coral Stylophorapistillata: effect of feeding, light, and ammonium concentrations. Limnol Oceanogr47:782–790. doi:10.4319/lo.2002.47.3.0782.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Pernice M,
    2. Meibom A,
    3. Van Den Heuvel A,
    4. Kopp C,
    5. Domart-Coulon I,
    6. Hoegh-Guldberg O,
    7. Dove S
    . 2012. A single-cell view of ammonium assimilation in coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis. ISME J6:1314–1324. doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Kopp C,
    2. Pernice M,
    3. Domart-Coulon I,
    4. Djediat C,
    5. Spangenberg JE,
    6. Alexander DTL,
    7. Hignette M,
    8. Meziane T,
    9. Meibom A
    . 2013. Highly dynamic cellular-level response of symbiotic coral to a sudden increase in environmental nitrogen. mBio4:e00052-13. doi:10.1128/mBio.00052-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Godinot C,
    2. Grover R,
    3. Allemand D,
    4. Ferrier-Pagès C
    . 2011. High phosphate uptake requirements of the scleractinian coral Stylophorapistillata. J Exp Biol214:2749–2754. doi:10.1242/jeb.054239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Mills MM,
    2. Ridame C,
    3. Davey M,
    4. La Roche J,
    5. Geider RJ
    . 2004. Iron and phosphorus co-limit nitrogen fixation in the eastern tropical North Atlantic. Nature429:292–294. doi:10.1038/nature02550.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Al-Niemi TS,
    2. Kahn ML,
    3. McDermott TR
    . 1997. P metabolism in the bean-Rhizobium tropici symbiosis. Plant Physiol113:1233–1242. doi:10.1104/pp.113.4.1233.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  55. 55.↵
    1. Batterman SA,
    2. Wurzburger N,
    3. Hedin LO
    . 2013. Nitrogen and phosphorus interact to control tropical symbiotic N2 fixation: a test in Inga punctata. J Ecol101:1400–1408. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12138.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    1. Gutschick VP
    . 1981. Evolved strategies in nitrogen acquisition by plants. Am Nat118:607–637. doi:10.1086/283858.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Israel DW
    . 1987. Investigation of the role of phosphorus in symbiotic dinitrogen fixation. Plant Physiol84:835–840. doi:10.1104/pp.84.3.835.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Gentili F,
    2. Huss-Danell K
    . 2003. Local and systemic effects of phosphorus and nitrogen on nodulation and nodule function in Alnusincana. J Exp Bot54:2757–2767. doi:10.1093/jxb/erg311.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Robson A,
    2. O’hara G,
    3. Abbott L
    . 1981. Involvement of phosphorus in nitrogen fixation by subterranean clover (Trifoliumsubterraneum L.). Funct Plant Biol8:427–436.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.↵
    1. Karl D,
    2. Michaels A,
    3. Bergman B,
    4. Capone D,
    5. Carpenter E,
    6. Letelier R,
    7. Lipschultz F,
    8. Paerl H,
    9. Sigman D,
    10. Stal L
    . 2002. Dinitrogen fixation in the world’s oceans, p 47–98. InBoyer EW, Howarth RW (ed), The nitrogen cycle at regional to global scales. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  61. 61.↵
    1. Bednarz VN,
    2. van Hoytema N,
    3. Cardini U,
    4. Naumann MS,
    5. Al-Rshaidat MMD,
    6. Wild C
    . 2015. Dinitrogen fixation and primary productivity by carbonate and silicate reef sand communities of the northern Red Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser527:47–57. doi:10.3354/meps11224.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. 62.↵
    1. Santos HF,
    2. Carmo FL,
    3. Duarte G,
    4. Dini-Andreote F,
    5. Castro CB,
    6. Rosado AS,
    7. van Elsas JD,
    8. Peixoto RS
    . 2014. Climate change affects key nitrogen-fixing bacterial populations on coral reefs. ISME J8:2272–2279. doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.70.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    1. Lee STM,
    2. Davy SK,
    3. Tang SL,
    4. Fan TY,
    5. Kench PS
    . 2015. Successive shifts in the microbial community of the surface mucus layer and tissues of the coral Acroporamuricata under thermal stress. FEMS Microbiol Ecol91:289–296. doi:10.1093/femsec/fiv142.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. 64.↵
    1. Postgate JR
    . 1982. The fundamentals of nitrogen fixation.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  65. 65.↵
    1. Tremblay P,
    2. Naumann MS,
    3. Sikorski S,
    4. Grover R,
    5. Ferrier-Pagès C
    . 2012. Experimental assessment of organic carbon fluxes in the scleractinian coral Stylophorapistillata during a thermal and photo stress event. Mar Ecol Prog Ser453:63–77. doi:10.3354/meps09640.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.↵
    1. Niggl W,
    2. Glas M,
    3. Laforsch C,
    4. Mayr C,
    5. Wild C
    . 2009. First evidence of coral bleaching stimulating organic matter release by reef corals, p 905–911. Proc 11th Int Coral Reef Symp, 7 to 11 July 2008, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
  67. 67.↵
    1. Wooldridge SA
    . 2009. A new conceptual model for the enhanced release of mucus in symbiotic reef corals during ‘bleaching’ conditions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser396:145–152. doi:10.3354/meps08310.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. 68.↵
    1. Berman-Frank I,
    2. Lundgren P,
    3. Chen YB,
    4. Küpper H,
    5. Kolber Z,
    6. Bergman B,
    7. Falkowski P
    . 2001. Segregation of nitrogen fixation and oxygenic photosynthesis in the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Science294:1534–1537. doi:10.1126/science.1064082.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    1. Stal LJ
    . 2009. Is the distribution of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in the oceans related to temperature?Environ Microbiol11:1632–1645. doi:10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00016.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. 70.↵
    1. Alamaru A,
    2. Loya Y,
    3. Brokovich E,
    4. Yam R,
    5. Shemesh A
    . 2009. Carbon and nitrogen utilization in two species of Red Sea corals along a depth gradient: insights from stable isotope analysis of total organic material and lipids. Geochim Cosmochim Acta73:5333–5342. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2009.06.018.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. 71.↵
    1. Muscatine L,
    2. Kaplan I
    . 1994. Resource partitioning by reef corals as determined from stable isotope composition II. δ15N of Zooxanthellae and animal tissue versus depth. Pac Sci48:304–312.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.↵
    1. Wankel SD,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Kendall C,
    4. Post AF,
    5. Paytan A
    . 2010. Sources of aerosol nitrate to the Gulf of Aqaba: evidence from δ15N and δ18O of nitrate and trace metal chemistry. Mar Chem120:90–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  73. 73.↵
    1. Slattery M,
    2. Lesser MP,
    3. Brazeau D,
    4. Stokes MD,
    5. Leichter JJ
    . 2011. Connectivity and stability of mesophotic coral reefs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol408:32–41. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2011.07.024.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  74. 74.↵
    1. Muscatine L,
    2. Porter JW,
    3. Kaplan IR
    . 1989. Resource partitioning by reef corals as determined from stable isotope composition. Mar Biol100:185–193. doi:10.1007/BF00391957.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. 75.↵
    1. Grover R,
    2. Maguer J,
    3. Allemand D,
    4. Ferrier-Pagès C
    . 2003. Nitrate uptake in the scleractinian coral Stylophorapistillata. Limnol Oceanogr48:2266–2274. doi:10.4319/lo.2003.48.6.2266.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. 76.↵
    1. Dubinsky Z,
    2. Jokiel PL
    . 1994. Ratio of energy and nutrient fluxes regulates symbiosis between zooxanthellae and corals. Pac Sci48:313–324.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.↵
    1. Ribes M,
    2. Dziallas C,
    3. Coma R,
    4. Riemann L
    . 2015. Microbial diversity and putative diazotrophy in high- and low-microbial-abundance Mediterranean sponges. Appl Environ Microbiol81:5683–5693. doi:10.1128/AEM.01320-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. 78.↵
    1. Middelburg JJ,
    2. Mueller CE,
    3. Veuger B,
    4. Larsson AI,
    5. Form A,
    6. van Oevelen D
    . 2015. Discovery of symbiotic nitrogen fixation and chemoautotrophy in cold-water corals. Sci Rep5:17962. doi:10.1038/srep17962.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    1. Klawonn I,
    2. Lavik G,
    3. Böning P,
    4. Marchant HK,
    5. Dekaezemacker J,
    6. Mohr W,
    7. Ploug H
    . 2015. Simple approach for the preparation of (15-15)N2-enriched water for nitrogen fixation assessments: evaluation, application and recommendations. Front Microbiol6:769. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00769.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  80. 80.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Paytan A,
    3. Chase Z,
    4. Measures C,
    5. Beck AJ,
    6. Sañudo-Wilhelmy SA,
    7. Post AF
    . 2008. Sources and fluxes of atmospheric trace elements to the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. J Geophys Res113:D05306. doi:10.1029/2007JD009110.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  81. 81.↵
    1. Montoya JP,
    2. Voss M,
    3. Kähler P,
    4. Capone DG
    . 1996. A simple, high-precision, high-sensitivity tracer assay for N2 fixation. Appl Environ Microbiol62:986–993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. 82.↵
    1. Stimson J,
    2. Kinzie RA
    . 1991. The temporal pattern and rate of release of zooxanthellae from the reef coral Pocilloporadamicornis (Linnaeus) under nitrogen-enrichment and control conditions. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol153:63–74. doi:10.1016/S0022-0981(05)80006-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  83. 83.↵
    1. Clarke KR,
    2. Gorley RN
    . 2006. Primer version 6: user manual/tutorial primer-E. Plymouth, England.
  84. 84.↵
    1. Anderson MJ
    . 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol26:32–46. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Assimilation of Diazotroph-Derived Nitrogen by Scleractinian Corals Depends on Their Metabolic Status
Vanessa N. Bednarz, Renaud Grover, Jean-François Maguer, Maoz Fine, Christine Ferrier-Pagès
mBio Jan 2017, 8 (1) e02058-16; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02058-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Assimilation of Diazotroph-Derived Nitrogen by Scleractinian Corals Depends on Their Metabolic Status
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Assimilation of Diazotroph-Derived Nitrogen by Scleractinian Corals Depends on Their Metabolic Status
Vanessa N. Bednarz, Renaud Grover, Jean-François Maguer, Maoz Fine, Christine Ferrier-Pagès
mBio Jan 2017, 8 (1) e02058-16; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02058-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anthozoa
Nitrogen
nitrogen fixation
Prokaryotic Cells

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511