Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article

Deciphering Clostridium tyrobutyricum Metabolism Based on the Whole-Genome Sequence and Proteome Analyses

Joungmin Lee, Yu-Sin Jang, Mee-Jung Han, Jin Young Kim, Sang Yup Lee
Michael G. Katze, Editor
Joungmin Lee
aMetabolic and Biomolecular Engineering National Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 Plus Program), KAIST, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu-Sin Jang
aMetabolic and Biomolecular Engineering National Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 Plus Program), KAIST, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mee-Jung Han
bDepartment of Biomolecular and Chemical Engineering, Dongyang University, Yeongju, Gyeongbuk, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jin Young Kim
cMass Spectrometry Research Center, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju, Chungbuk, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sang Yup Lee
aMetabolic and Biomolecular Engineering National Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 Plus Program), KAIST, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, South Korea
dBioinformatics Research Center, KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea
eBioProcess Engineering Research Center, Center for Systems and Synthetic Biotechnology, KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea
fInstitute for the BioCentury, KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael G. Katze
University of Washington
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yin Li
Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Roles: Solicited external reviewer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe Soucaille
INSA-Toulouse
Roles: Solicited external reviewer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00743-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Clostridium tyrobutyricum is a Gram-positive anaerobic bacterium that efficiently produces butyric acid and is considered a promising host for anaerobic production of bulk chemicals. Due to limited knowledge on the genetic and metabolic characteristics of this strain, however, little progress has been made in metabolic engineering of this strain. Here we report the complete genome sequence of C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387 (ATCC 25755), which consists of a 3.07-Mbp chromosome and a 63-kbp plasmid. The results of genomic analyses suggested that C. tyrobutyricum produces butyrate from butyryl-coenzyme A (butyryl-CoA) through acetate reassimilation by CoA transferase, differently from Clostridium acetobutylicum, which uses the phosphotransbutyrylase-butyrate kinase pathway; this was validated by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) of related genes, protein expression levels, in vitro CoA transferase assay, and fed-batch fermentation. In addition, the changes in protein expression levels during the course of batch fermentations on glucose were examined by shotgun proteomics. Unlike C. acetobutylicum, the expression levels of proteins involved in glycolytic and fermentative pathways in C. tyrobutyricum did not decrease even at the stationary phase. Proteins related to energy conservation mechanisms, including Rnf complex, NfnAB, and pyruvate-phosphate dikinase that are absent in C. acetobutylicum, were identified. Such features explain why this organism can produce butyric acid to a much higher titer and better tolerate toxic metabolites. This study presenting the complete genome sequence, global protein expression profiles, and genome-based metabolic characteristics during the batch fermentation of C. tyrobutyricum will be valuable in designing strategies for metabolic engineering of this strain.

IMPORTANCE Bio-based production of chemicals from renewable biomass has become increasingly important due to our concerns on climate change and other environmental problems. C. tyrobutyricum has been used for efficient butyric acid production. In order to further increase the performance and expand the capabilities of this strain toward production of other chemicals, metabolic engineering needs to be performed. For this, better understanding on the metabolic and physiological characteristics of this bacterium at the genome level is needed. This work reporting the results of complete genomic and proteomic analyses together with new insights on butyric acid biosynthetic pathway and energy conservation will allow development of strategies for metabolic engineering of C. tyrobutyricum for the bio-based production of various chemicals in addition to butyric acid.

INTRODUCTION

As agreed at the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP-21) meeting in Paris, France, on urgent action to be taken for addressing climate change, it is necessary to reduce our dependence on fossil resources and move toward bio-based production of chemicals, fuels, and materials from renewable resources. Among the chemicals that can be produced by microorganisms, butyric acid is an important industrial chemical that has been used for the production of short-chain esters for perfume and food flavoring agents (1). In addition, butyric acid can be used to produce various pharmaceuticals such as vasoconstrictor drugs, anticancer agents, and antioxidants (2).

Clostridium tyrobutyricum is a Gram-positive, strictly anaerobic bacterium that most efficiently produces butyric acid. This organism has received much attention in the dairy industry because contamination by C. tyrobutyricum spores in cheese fermentation processes often causes the late-blowing defect, resulting in inferior cheese quality mainly due to the undesirable flavor of butyric acid (3–5). C. tyrobutyricum can be employed as a great microbial cell factory for the production of various chemicals due to several advantages including its ability to grow on a minimal medium, high metabolic flux toward butyric acid, and tolerance to the product at high concentrations (6). Despite such potential, C. tyrobutyricum has received less attention as an industrial host strain compared to other clostridial species, mainly due to our limited understanding on its genotypic and metabolic characteristics at the genome level or scale. Most studies of this bacterium so far have been focused on the optimization of fermentation processes (7–10). To date, only a few metabolic genes of C. tyrobutyricum have been knocked out (11–13). It has been reported that deletion of the pta gene encoding phosphotransacetylase (PTA) resulted in reduction of PTA activity up to 60%, and consequently increased butyric acid titer by 68% (12). Deletion of the ack gene encoding acetate kinase (AK) led to a similar result, increasing the butyric acid titer and yield (14). More recently, deletion of the ptb gene encoding phosphotransbutyrylase (PTB) has been demonstrated, but the butyric acid yield of the ptb mutant was similar to that of the wild-type strain despite its reduced PTB activity (13).

In addition to butyric acid, C. tyrobutyricum has great potential to be employed for the production of other chemicals. A recent study on the metabolic engineering of C. tyrobutyricum suggested that overexpression of C. acetobutylicum adhE2 in an ack-deleted C. tyrobutyricum strain resulted in production of 10 g liter−1 of 1-butanol from glucose (15). It was demonstrated that C. tyrobutyricum could tolerate 1-butanol at the initial concentration of 15 g liter−1, at which a native 1-butanol producer Clostridium beijerinckii ATCC 55025 was not able to grow (15). More recently, optimizing the expression of Clostridium acetobutylicum adhE2 in C. tyrobutyricum led to the production of 20 g liter−1 of 1-butanol from mannitol without manipulating the competing pathways (16); this 1-butanol concentration is higher than those obtained by native 1-butanol producers (17, 18). Even though mannitol is a more-reduced substrate than glucose, this result suggests that further improvement could be achieved in C. tyrobutyricum through systems metabolic engineering (19, 20). More recently, a draft genome sequence of C. tyrobutyricum has been reported (21, 22). Based on the draft genome sequence, proteomic studies of the wild-type and mutant strains of C. tyrobutyricum have been performed (23). However, the lack of complete genome sequence and transcriptomic and/or proteomic studies during the course of fermentation has limited our understanding of the physiological characteristics of C. tyrobutyricum for subsequent metabolic engineering at the systems level.

In this study, we report the complete genome sequence of C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387 (ATCC 25755) and its proteome profiles during the course of batch fermentation. Strikingly, the complete genome sequence suggested that this bacterium does not use PTB and butyrate kinase (BK) for butyric acid production; instead, a coenzyme A (CoA) transferase (CoAT) mediates butyric acid production from butyryl-CoA by reassimilation of acetic acid, which is produced by PTA and AK. Also, several energy conservation mechanisms in C. tyrobutyricum, which are responsible for its capability to efficiently produce butyric acid and tolerate toxic products, were identified by proteomic analyses during the course of fermentation.

RESULTS

Features of the complete C. tyrobutyricum genome.The general features of the C. tyrobutyricum genome are summarized in Table 1. The important statistics are generally in agreement with the draft sequences reported recently (21, 22). The genome of C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387 contains one circular 3.07-Mbp chromosome and one circular 63-kbp plasmid (designated pCTK01; Fig. 1A). The strand bias of the chromosomal genes is one important characteristic in Firmicutes (24), and the origin and terminus of replication of the chromosome are located at nearly 0° and 180°, respectively; about 80% of the chromosomal genes are carried on the leading strand. The locations of the chromosomal replication origin and terminus are consistent with those predicted by GC skew analysis (Fig. 1). There are two 52-kbp duplicated regions at 116° and 122° on the chromosome; the majority of the genes in these clusters are those with unknown functions, and some of them encode phage-related proteins.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1 

General features of C. tyrobutyricum genome and comparison with other closely related clostridial species

FIG 1 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1 

Genome atlas view of the C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387 (ATCC 25755) chromosome and the pCTK01 plasmid. The outermost ring shows the coordinates of the chromosome or plasmid. The coding sequences in the forward and reverse strands are colored blue and orange, respectively. tRNAs and rRNAs are indicated by red and green, respectively. The fourth and fifth rings represent the deviations of GC content and GC skew, i.e., (G − C)/(G + C), from their average values, respectively; purple, negative deviation (below average); green, positive deviation (above average).

Like pCKL555A in Clostridium kluyveri (25), a species taxonomically close to C. tyrobutyricum, the genes on the pCTK01 plasmid have no clearly known functions, except for those encoding a DNA topoisomerase (CTK_P00130), a sigma factor (CTK_P00210), an arsenite transporter (CTK_P00580-610), and those encoding putative proteins for conjugal plasmid transfer (CTK_P00290-410). Plasmid pCTK01 shows neither the strand bias of the genes nor a clear transition of GC skew, suggesting that this plasmid might replicate via rolling-circle mechanism rather than theta-type mechanism (26). However, we could not find those known genes in pCTK01 for its replication, and thus, further studies are needed to understand how this plasmid replicates.

The genes in C. tyrobutyricum were functionally annotated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) automatic annotation server (27), and the annotation results were compared with those for C. kluyveri and Clostridium ljungdahlii. Among the 3,138 protein-coding genes, 49.4% of them (1,552 genes) could be assigned with KEGG Orthology (KO) numbers. This result is slightly better than those of C. kluyveri (42.2%) and C. ljungdahlii (45.7%). Despite its smaller genome size, the number of KO categories assigned to C. tyrobutyricum genes was 1,257, which was comparable to those in C. kluyveri (1,248 KOs) and C. ljungdahlii (1,370 KOs).

Shotgun proteomic analyses of C. tyrobutyricum.In order to better understand metabolic characteristics of C. tyrobutyricum, protein expression profiles were examined during batch fermentation on glucose. Samples from duplicated batch fermentations of C. tyrobutyricum were subjected to shotgun proteomic analyses (Fig. 2A). About 100 g liter−1 of glucose was completely consumed within 30 h, and the maximum optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached was about 38. The major fermentation products were acetic acid (11.1 g liter−1) and butyric acid (32.9 g liter−1), and larger or higher-carbon-numbered (>C5) fatty acids were not produced. While the butyric acid yield (0.32 g g−1 glucose) was similar to that reported in a previous study (23), the acetic acid yield was slightly higher in our result (0.11 versus 0.074 g g−1), possibly due to the different composition of the culture media. As expected from its genome sequence, acetone and butanol were not detected throughout the fermentation, but small amounts of formic acid (3.1 g liter−1) and ethanol (0.7 g liter−1) were produced.

FIG 2 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2 

Summary of the C. tyrobutyricum shotgun proteomics. (A) Batch fermentation profiles used for the sample preparation. Symbols: closed circles, glucose; closed squares, OD600; closed diamonds, acetic acid; closed triangles, butyric acid; open squares, ethanol. (B) A Venn diagram of proteins identified at each sampling point for label-free shotgun proteomic data. The number of proteins is shown in each area. (C) Histograms that present relative protein fold changes at C4 and C6 compared to C2 based on TMT-tagged proteome samples.

Samples for proteome profiling were taken at early exponential (C2), late exponential (C4), and stationary (C6) phases (Fig. 2A). Proteins isolated from two independent samples at the same phase were mixed and fragmented using trypsin. The resulting peptide fragments were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). All unique peptide sequences identified were compared to the predicted amino acid sequences of C. tyrobutyricum genes. Estimated false-positive rates of peptides were 0.3% for C2, 0.7% for C4, and 1.0% for C6. A total of 1,263 proteins were identified during the course of C. tyrobutyricum fermentation, and of these proteins, 774 proteins were identified at all phases (Fig. 2B; see Data Set S1 in the supplemental material). The numbers of identified proteins at C2, C4, and C6 were 1,046, 1,082, and 963, respectively, which were categorized based on KO assignment in Table 2.

Data Set S1

Proteins identified by label-free shotgun proteomics. Download Data Set S1, XLS file, 0.6 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2 

C. tyrobutyricum proteins identified by label-free shotgun proteome during the course of batch fermentation

From the label-free proteome data obtained, the relative abundance of the proteins were calculated using the normalized spectral abundance factors (NSAF; Data Set S1). Compared to C2, about 85% and 66% of proteins at C4 and C6, respectively, showed changes in their expression levels within twofold. Highly abundant proteins in all phases included 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12 (CTK_28970), 60-kDa chaperonin GroEL (CTK_C26260), elongation factor Tu (CTK_C28900 and CTK_C29040), thiolase (CTK_01450), and 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase (CTK_26330). These results are similar to those obtained from the shotgun proteomic analyses of C. acetobutylicum (28). One exceptional case was flavodoxin (CTK_C21890), which was only the 465th most abundant at C2, but the most abundant at C4 and the 5th most abundant at C6.

For more accurate determination of protein fold changes between the samples, we additionally performed relative quantification of the peptides labeled by Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) isobaric tags in duplicates for each sampling point (Fig. 2C; see Data Set S2 in the supplemental material). In this case, 587 proteins were identified. Proteins with significant fold changes (P value of 0.05) are shown in Table 3. Significantly upregulated genes include the genes involved in flagellar formation, iron transport, cofactor biosynthesis, stress response, and sporulation, whereas downregulated genes include genes encoding a transcription elongation factor, an ABC transporter, enzymes involved in fructose metabolism, and carbon monoxide dehydrogenase.

Data Set S2

Protein changes determined by TMT isobaric tagging. Download Data Set S2, XLS file, 0.3 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3 

Proteins with significant changes identified by TMT-labeled shotgun proteome

Central metabolism of C. tyrobutyricum.An overview of the metabolic pathway in C. tyrobutyricum and changes in the expression levels of proteins involved in key metabolism are shown in Fig. 3. Shotgun proteomic data suggested that the phosphotransferase system (PTS) is mainly used in C. tyrobutyricum for glucose uptake. During the batch fermentation of C. tyrobutyricum on glucose, PTS enzyme I (CTK_C28440) and phosphocarrier protein Hpr (CTK_C17590) were identified at all phases. The results of genome sequence analysis suggest that there are two putative glucose-specific PTS enzyme II genes in C. tyrobutyricum: CTK_C27920 encoding only the IIA domain and CTK_C20580 encoding the entire set of IIA, IIB, and IIC domains. CTK_C27920 expression was not observed at any phase, while CTK_C20580 expression was observed in all three phases. Thus, the latter might be the major PTS II enzyme for glucose uptake. The expression levels of PTS II enzyme and HPr increased at C4 and C6, whereas PTS I decreased gradually.

FIG 3 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3 

Protein changes of the central metabolic pathway in C. tyrobutyricum. The protein changes are from TMT-labeled identification results. Genes which products were identified are indicated in blue. Genes indicated in black are those genes whose products were not identified in TMT-labeled samples but were identified in label-free samples. Genes indicated in red are those genes whose products were not identified both in TMT-labeled and label-free peptide samples. Glucose-6-P, glucose-6-phosphate; Fdox, oxidized ferredoxin.

Besides the PTS genes, three genes (CTK_C04350, -C07580, and -C21040) were predicted to encode sugar:H+ symporters, which might be used as alternative routes for glucose transport as in C. beijerinckii (29). However, only CTK_C04350 was weakly expressed at the stationary phase, suggesting that the PTS system described above is the major route for glucose transport in C. tyrobutyricum. In addition to glucose transporters, fructose-specific PTS (CTK_C06320; enzyme IIABC [EIIABC]) was abundantly expressed at the early exponential phase (C2), but its expression level decreased dramatically at the later phases (Table 3). This transient expression of the fru operon genes might be independent of catabolite repression in that the expression levels of catabolite control proteins, CcpA and histidine protein (HPr) kinase, were decreased at C6.

C. tyrobutyricum is found to catabolize glucose into pyruvate mainly via glycolysis. Genes related to the Entner-Doudoroff pathway and the oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate (PP) pathway are not present. Interestingly, a cluster (CTK_C23730 to -C23750) consisting of the rpi (ribose 5-phosphate isomerase), tal (transaldolase), and tkt (transketolase) genes was found in the genome, but none of their products were identified in the proteome. Additional rpi (CTK_C01400) and tkt (CTK_C09210) genes were found to be actively expressed, but no additional tal gene was found in the C. tyrobutyricum genome. As in other clostridial species, C. tyrobutyricum converts pyruvate into acetyl-CoA and CO2 using pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase. Of the two genes encoding pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (CTK_C21650 and CTK_C25530), CTK_C21650 was constitutively expressed (20th, 24th, and 30th most abundant at C2, C4, and C6 phases, respectively), while CTK_C25530 was weakly expressed only at the C2 phase. Formic acid is produced by pyruvate:formate lyase (PFL); the genes encoding PFL (CTK_C22190) and PFL-activating enzyme (CTK_C22180) were expressed at all of the sampling points, but its expression level decreased as cells grew.

Fermentative pathways in C. tyrobutyricum.Previously, the pta (12), ack (11), and ptb (13) knockout mutant strains of C. tyrobutyricum ATCC 25755 have been reported. Based on the complete genome sequence of the KCTC 5387 (same as ATCC 25755) strain determined in this study, the fermentative pathways in C. tyrobutyricum were revisited. As expected, acetic acid is produced mainly through PTA and AK; the pta (CTK_C18230) and ack (CTK_C18220) genes are present in the C. tyrobutyricum genome. As in C. acetobutylicum, the expression of pta and ack was constitutive (30, 31). PTA was not identified after TMT labeling, but AK gradually increased from C2, reaching 1.5-fold increase at C6 (Fig. 3).

Our biggest surprise was that the genes encoding PTB and BK are missing in the whole genome of the KCTC 5387 strain and in the draft genome sequences of the ATCC 25755 strain that were previously reported (21, 22). Consistent with this finding, our numerous attempts to amplify the partial ptb fragment according to the previous study (13) were not successful (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). This result suggests that the ptb and buk genes are indeed absent in the C. tyrobutyricum genome, and butyric acid is produced by C. tyrobutyricum using a pathway that is different from PTB-BK pathway used by C. acetobutylicum and C. beijerinckii (Fig. 4A). To further confirm this, the enzyme activities of PTB and BK were measured in the crude extracts of C. tyrobutyricum and C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 (as a positive control). The crude extract of C. tyrobutyricum showed much lower activities of PTB and BK compared to those of C. acetobutylicum (Fig. 4B), strongly supporting the absence of PTB and BK in C. tyrobutyricum. The PTB and BK activities in the C. tyrobutyricum extract were 0.144 and 0.061 U/mg protein, which were only 2.7% and 1.6% of those in the C. acetobutylicum extract, respectively; the residual weak PTB/BK activities seem to come from the cross-activities of PTA/AK.

Figure S4 

Determination of the ptb gene in the C. tyrobutyricum genome. Download Figure S4, DOC file, 0.7 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG 4 
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4 

Butyric acid production in C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387 (ATCC 25755) depends on butyrate:acetate CoA transferase, not phosphotransbutyrylase (PTB) and butyrate kinase (BK). (A) Hypothesized pathway of butyric acid production in C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387. (B) Specific activities of PTB and BK in the crude extracts of C. tyrobutyricum (Cty) and C. acetobutylicum (Cac) ATCC 824. C. acetobutylicum was chosen as the positive control, as it has PTB and BK activities. (C) Specific activities of butyrate:acetate CoA transferase in the C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387 crude extract. The assay was performed in the presence (+) or absence (−) of sodium acetate (SA). (D) RT-PCR of four candidate CoA transferase genes in the wild-type (WT) and cat1::int strains of C. tyrobutyricum. The thiolase gene was chosen as the internal control.

It was suggested that butyrate:acetate CoAT is required for butyrate biosynthesis in C. kluyveri (25). There are four genes encoding different CoA transferases in the C. tyrobutyricum genome. Products of two genes (CTK_C06520 and CTK_C07660) are homologous to C. kluyveri CoAT (25), and the other two genes (CTK_C16610 and CTK_C28060) share homology with the propionate:acetate CoAT from C. propionicum (32). There were no orthlogs of C. acetobutylicum CtfAB in C. tyrobutyricum as previously suggested (23). As the cell extract of C. tyrobutyricum clearly showed CoAT activity (Fig. 4C), we aimed to identify the key CoAT responsible for butyrate formation. Based on both reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) (Fig. 4D) and proteome analyses, it was concluded that the cat1 (CTK_C06520) gene is the only gene responsible for butyrate biosynthesis. To see whether CoAT encoded by the cat1 gene is truly responsible for butyrate formation, this gene was knocked out using a mobile group II intron. However, insertion of a mobile group II intron into the coding sequence (CDS) in the sense direction (cat1::intS strain) did not decrease butyric acid production during batch fermentation (data not shown). RT-PCR of the cat1::intS strain suggested that the other putative CoAT genes were not turned on in consequence of cat1 inactivation either (Fig. 4D); in fact, only the wild-type mRNA of the cat1 gene was observed, suggesting that the active Cat1 was still produced after the resplicing of the mutant mRNA due to the presence of the knockout plasmid. To solve this problem, we tried plasmid curing in the cat1::intS strain and inserting the intron in the antisense direction, both of which were not successful. Insertion of the intron in the antisense direction into the pta and ack genes was also not successful; as well-known in the field, knocking out certain genes in clostridial strains can be extremely difficult, which was the case in this study.

Energy conservation.There are three energy conservation mechanisms found in the C. tyrobutyricum genome (Fig. 3): Rnf complex (CTK_C13030-CTK_C13080), NfnAB (CTK_C26320 and CTK_C26310), and pyruvate-phosphate dikinase (CTK_C24060). The Rnf complex generates NADH and proton gradient using reduced ferredoxin (25, 33). The proton gradient generated can be used to generate ATP via FoF1 ATPase. The NfnAB complex was first characterized in C. kluyveri, and it generates two NADPH molecules by the oxidation of one reduced ferredoxin and one NADH (34). Pyruvate-phosphate dikinase (PPDK) can generate ATP using phosphoenolpyruvate, AMP, and pyrophosphate (35).

Based on the proteomic analysis, the major energy conservation mechanisms when using glucose involve NfnAB and PPDK. The expression of the Rnf complex was apparently weak; only RnfC was identified in the label-free shotgun proteome. Both NfnA and NfnB were strongly expressed at early exponential phase; NfnA and NfnB were the 82nd and the 38th most abundant proteins, respectively, in the label-free proteome at C2. However, expression of NfnAB gradually decreased as cells grew; both NfnA and NfnB in the TMT-labeled proteome decreased by about 50% at C6 compared to C2. Expression of PPDK was not strong at C2 (the 741st most abundant); it was upregulated at C4 (1.6-fold compared to C2) and C6 (2.2-fold increase compared to C2).

Sporulation.Sporulation is a key characteristic of Bacillus and Clostridium species (30, 36). Even though Clostridium shares many proteins involved in the sporulation process with Bacillus, the mechanism of sporulation initiation in Clostridium is known to be different from that in Bacillus. The clostridial sporulation program has recently been reviewed thoroughly (36), but it might be different even among clostridial species. Since C. tyrobutyricum is able to undergo the sporulation process as well, the expression patterns of the sporulation genes were compared with those in other clostridial species.

Several genes for the initiation of sporulation were found in the genome, and the changes in the expression levels of some of these genes during the fermentation are shown in Fig. S3 in the supplemental material. The initiation of sporulation appears to be similar to those in other clostridial species. The expression level of Spo0A (CTK_C1943), the master regulator of sporulation, increased as fermentation proceeded. The expression level of AbrB protein (CTK_00640), which represses the sigH gene (CTK_29050) encoding σH and is repressed by phosphorylated Spo0A, decreased. This further promotes increased expression of Spo0A. It has been reported that orphan histidine kinases (HKs) directly phosphorylate Spo0A in clostridia (14, 37, 38). Two genes encoding putative orphan HKs (CTK_02350 and CTK_C04290) are present in the genome. Also, there is evidence in clostridial species that σK is involved at the early sporulation cascade (39, 40).

Figure S3 

Schematic diagram of the clostridial sporulation cascade and corresponding protein changes in C. tyrobutyricum. Download Figure S3, DOC file, 0.3 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Once the forespore is developed, expression of the sporulation genes is spatially differentiated (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). While the early sporulation proteins could be identified in the proteome, those involved in the later stages seemed to be expressed rather weakly. It is known that in the forespore, spoIIAA (CTK_C08840), spoIIAB (CTK_C08850), and spoIIE (CTK_C29350) are involved in the control of σF (CTK_C08860) activity. The abundance of these proteins was much lower than that of Spo0A. Even though SpoIIAA and SpoIIE were not identified at some or all phases in nonlabeled experiments, it was possible to observe their relative changes after TMT tagging. SpoIIAB was induced at C4 and showed strongest expression at C6, whereas SpoIIE slightly decreased at C4 and increased at C6 compared to C2. This pattern is similar to previous cDNA microarray studies in C. acetobutylicum (31, 41). The expression levels of SpoIIAA and σF in the total protein pool were much lower than SpoIIAB (Fig. S3 in the supplemental material), which is unexpected as spoIIAA, spoIIAB, and sigF constitute an operon in C. tyrobutyricum as in other species. Both σE and σF were identified only at C6. Other key proteins including SpoIIGA (CTK_C18750), σG (CTK_C18730), and σK were not identified.

DISCUSSION

C. tyrobutyricum is a potentially versatile microbial cell factory for the production of various chemicals due to its proven ability to produce butyric acid to a high titer with high-level product tolerance. It is however difficult to perform metabolic engineering of this strain due to the lack of understanding of its genotypic and metabolic characteristics at the genome level. This is why we decided to determine the complete genome sequence beyond an available draft genome sequence and perform genome-wide proteomic studies during the course of batch fermentation. One interesting feature of the C. tyrobutyricum genome is its compactness; its genome size is about 78% and 65% of that of its closest relatives C. kluyveri and C. ljungdahlii, respectively (Table 1). The C. tyrobutyricum genome contains 20 multiplicated genes encoding putative transposases, whereas at most, 5 genes are present in the C. ljungdahlii genome. This large number of insertion sequence (IS) elements might contribute to the loss of genes in C. tyrobutyricum via homologous recombination (42). A region with inverted GC skew located from 318° to 322° of the chromosome strongly supports our hypothesis (Fig. 1). This inverted region is flanked by two duplicated transposase genes (CTK_C27190 and CTK_C27510) oriented in the opposite direction, indicating that this inversion is due to homologous recombination.

From the whole-genome and shotgun proteome data, most genes involved in central metabolism could be identified. On the basis of the genome information, C. tyrobutyricum depends on the nonoxidative PP pathway to synthesize precursors of nucleotides and amino acids. However, transaldolase was not identified in the shotgun proteome; additional rpi and tkt genes, distantly located from the rpi-tal-tkt operon, were actively expressed (Fig. 3). It was suggested in Clostridium stercorarium, which does not have a transaldolase gene but utilizes xylose as the sole carbon source, that 3-deoxy-d-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase might replace the role of transaldolase (43). In C. tyrobutyricum, this gene (CTK_C27090) was strongly expressed (see Data Set S1 in the supplemental material), supporting this hypothesis.

As clostridial species do not have an oxidative phosphorylation mechanism, a major role of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle might be the generation of precursors for various building blocks including amino acids. It is suggested that C. acetobutylicum uses a bifurcated TCA cycle (44, 45). Several key enzymes, including (Re)-citrate synthase, pyruvate carboxylase, NAD-dependent malic enzyme and malate dehydrogenase, were identified in the shotgun proteome of C. tyrobutyricum. Unlike C. acetobutylicum, however, α-ketoglutarate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase, which is required for the synthesis of succinyl-CoA from α-ketoglutarate, is absent in the C. tyrobutyricum genome and also in the genomes of C. kluyveri and C. ljungdahlii. Since these strains have only homoserine O-succinyltransferase, how succinyl-CoA is synthesized for methionine biosynthesis remains a question.

In many clostridial species, ferredoxin mediates the electron transfer of several enzymes including hydrogenase and pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase. Pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase uses ferredoxin as the major electron acceptor under high-iron conditions, but flavodoxin is an alternative electron acceptor when iron is limited (46). The expression of one flavodoxin protein (CTK_C2203) dramatically increased from the late exponential phase (ca. 10-fold); in fact, estimated abundance of the flavodoxin protein based on its NASF value indicated that this protein constituted ca. 3% of the total proteins identified. This result is in agreement with the previous findings using Clostridium formicoaceticum (46).

One of the most striking findings was that C. tyrobutyricum uses the CoAT pathway for butyric acid production, rather than the PTB-BK pathway. The strain employed for genome sequencing in this study was C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387, which is the same strain as ATCC 25755 that has been draft sequenced before. The partial sequence of the pta gene reported for ATCC 25755 (12) is almost identical to that of the KCTC 5387 strain (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material for amino acid sequence alignment). In the case of ack (11), however, neither nucleotide nor amino acid sequence is similar to that of the KCTC 5387 strain (see Fig. S2 for amino acid sequence alignment). In fact, the partial AK sequence reported by X. Liu et al. (11) is exactly the same as that of the Acinetobacter sp. strain AK. Y. Zhang et al. (13) have reported inactivation of the ptb gene in C. tyrobutyricum ATCC 25755. However, there were neither ptb nor buk in the complete genome of the C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387 strain, which was further supported by in vitro enzyme assay (Fig. 4B). Just in case the KCTC 5387 strain deposited at the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC) is different from ATCC 25755, we ordered a new ATCC 25755 strain from ATCC and examined the newly obtained strain for the presence of ptb; the ptb fragment could be amplified neither from KCTC 5387 nor from ATCC 25755 and DSM 2637 (Fig. S4). Thus, the previous results reported on the presence and knockout of ptb (13) need to be validated.

Figure S1 

Sequence alignment of the C. tyrobutyricum Pta protein. Download Figure S1, DOC file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Figure S2 

Sequence alignment of the C. tyrobutyricum Ack protein. Download Figure S2, DOC file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Despite the absence of ptb and buk, C. tyrobutyricum is still capable of producing a large amount of butyric acid using butyrate:acetate CoAT (Fig. 4C; see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material). Based on our results of homology-based search, RT-PCR, and proteome analyses, the cat1 gene was found to be responsible for this activity (Fig. 3 and 4D). We tried disrupting the pta, ack, and cat1 genes using a mobile group II intron, but all of these attempts were not successful. On the basis of our hypothesis (Fig. 4A), elimination of acetate biosynthesis would lead to no fermentation end product; thus, the pta and ack genes are essential. It is known that electron transfer from NADH to ferredoxin is thermodynamically infeasible in clostridial species, and butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase bifurcates electrons from two NADHs to crotonyl-CoA and ferredoxin (47). Reduced or lack of butyric acid production seems to affect the electron bifurcation, which makes the cells unable to oxidize NADH; this is most likely why the cat1 gene could not be knocked out. The ATP yield obtainable through the use of butyrate:acetate CoAT is equivalent to that obtainable with PTB-BK because butyrate formation by CoAT is coupled with acetate formation during which ATP is generated.

Figure S5 

Fed-batch fermentation profile of C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387. Download Figure S5, DOC file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Endospore formation is one of the important characteristics of clostridia. For the initiation of sporulation, clostridial strains directly phosphorylate Spo0A by orphan HKs. As in other clostridial species, spo0F and spo0B are not present in the C. tyrobutyricum genome, suggesting that the Spo0A protein might be directly phosphorylated by orphan HKs. However, even though two genes encoding putative orphan HKs (HKs; CTK_02350 and CTK_C04290) are found in the C. tyrobutyricum genome, the products of these two genes were not identified in the proteome samples. The current clostridial sporulation model is based on the transcriptional changes, and our result does not necessarily suggest that C. tyrobutyricum has a different mechanism for sporulation initiation. This should be addressed in the future by construction of various mutant strains and comparison of transcriptional and translational level changes in these mutants.

In this paper, we reported the complete genome of C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387 (ATCC 25755). On the basis of genomic and accompanying proteomic analyses during the course of batch fermentation, we were able to provide new insights on its butyric acid production pathway, energy conservation mechanisms, sporulation processes, and other metabolic characteristics. The results and data presented in this paper will be valuable in better understanding the physiological characteristics of C. tyrobutyricum and developing metabolic engineering strategies for constructing high-performance strains capable of producing various chemicals of interest. As stated above, it will also be important to validate previous results of butyric acid production through the reported PTB-BK pathway (13), as our results suggest that this pathway does not exist in the same strain examined (KCTC 5387 or ATCC 25755); instead, butyric acid is produced through the CoAT pathway in C. tyrobutyricum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Batch fermentation of C. tyrobutyricum.C. tyrobutyricum spores suspended in 2× YTG medium (glucose, 5 g liter−1; NaCl, 4 g liter−1; Bacto yeast extract, 10 g liter−1; Bacto tryptone, 16 g liter−1) supplemented with 15% (wt/vol) glycerol were inoculated in 10 ml of 2× YTG medium and heat shocked at 80°C for 10 min to kill the vegetative cells remaining in the suspension. After the heat shock, the test tube was incubated at 37°C in an anaerobic cabinet (Coy Laboratory Products, MI). A 500-ml capped flask containing 200 ml of the SP2 medium was inoculated with 5 ml of the 2× YTG culture grown overnight and incubated at 37°C until the OD600 reached to 1.0 to 2.0. This flask culture was used to inoculate a 5-liter bioreactor (LiFlus GX; Biotron, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) containing 1.8 liters of SP2 medium. The SP2 medium contains the following ingredients (all per liter): glucose, 100 g; KH2PO4, 0.5 g; K2HPO4, 0.5 g; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.2 g; MnSO4·5H2O, 0.014 g; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g; (NH4)2SO4, 2 g; Bacto yeast extract, 5 g; CH3COONa·3H2O, 5 g. During the fermentation, agitation speed and temperature were controlled at 200 rpm and 37°C, respectively. The pH of the fermentation medium was maintained at 6.0 by automatic addition of 7.5 M ammonia solution.

Isolation of genomic DNA and genome sequencing.For genomic DNA isolation, C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387 grown in 2× YTG medium was harvested at late exponential phase. Total DNA from C. tyrobutyricum KCTC 5387 used for the genome sequencing was extracted using a G-Spin total DNA extraction minikit (Intron Biotechnology, Seongnam, South Korea) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA prepared was fragmented to construct the library which was read using an Ion Torrent PGM 316 Chip sequencer at Genotech (Daejeon, South Korea). A total of 3,024,966 reads with the average length of ca. 230 bp were obtained and assembled into 96 contigs by a CLC Genomics Workbench 5.5.2 software (CLC Bio, Denmark). The maximum and average sizes of the contigs were ca. 190 kb and 31 kb, respectively. The complete genome sequence was assembled by comparing our contig sequences to other shotgun genome sequences of C. tyrobutyricum DSM 2637 and ATCC 25755 (21, 22) and performing PCR analysis. The ambiguous sequences compared to other draft genomes were further confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing.

Sample preparation for proteome analysis.C. tyrobutyricum cells (about 10 OD600/ml) were homogenized in 1 ml of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 0.5 mM Pefabloc SC, and 0.1% SDS) using Precellys 24 (Bertin Technologies, France) three times for 20 s each time at 6,500 rpm with a 5-min pause between homogenization cycles to prevent overheating. The supernatant was separated by centrifugation at 18,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C, the protein concentration was determined using a Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad), and aliquots were stored at −80°C. Each protein extract (100 µg) was reduced with 500 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) at room temperature for 60 min and then alkylated with 500 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) at room temperature in the dark for 60 min. The samples were desalted using a membrane filter of 10 kDa cutoff and dissolved in 200 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) buffer to a final concentration of 1 µg/µl. Sequencing-grade trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) was added at 1:20 (wt/wt) into proteins in TEAB buffer and incubated overnight at 37°C.

TMT labeling.Each peptide sample of individual proteins extracted from three C2, C4, and C6 sample points of Escherichia coli was divided into two fractions and was individually labeled using a TMTSixplex (TMT stands for tandem mass tag) reagents kit (catalog no. 90064, Thermo Scientific, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. TMT-126 and TMT-129 were used to label C2, TMT-128 and TMT-131 were used to label C4, and TMT-127 and TMT-130 were used to label C6. Aqueous hydroxylamine solution (5%, wt/vol) was added to quench the reaction. The six samples were then combined, speed vacuum dried, and then dissolved in 50 µl of Milli-Q−water containing 0.1% formic acid for liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis.

2D-LC-MS/MS analysis.The TMT-labeled or label-free samples were analyzed using a two-dimensional LC-MS/MS (2D-LC-MS/MS) system consisting of a nanoACQUITY ultraperformance LC system (Waters, USA) and an LTQ Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) equipped with a nanoelectrospray source. The 2D-LC-MS/MS analysis was performed as previously reported by M. P. Washburn et al. (48) with slight modifications. Briefly, a strong cation exchange (SCX) (5 µm, 3 cm) column was placed just before the C18 trap column (inner diameter [i.d.], 180 µm; length, 20 mm; particle size, 5 µm; Waters). Peptide solutions were loaded in 5-µl aliquots for each run. Peptides were displaced from the SCX phase to the C18 phase by a salt gradient that was introduced through an autosampler loop and desalted for 10 min at a flow rate of 4 µl/min. The trapped peptides were then separated on a 200-mm homemade microcapillary column consisting of C18 (Aqua; particle size, 3 µm) packed into 100-µm silica tubing with an orifice i.d. of 5 µm. A 10-step salt gradient was performed using 3 µl of 0, 25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 mM ammonium acetate (0.1% formic acid in 5% acetonitrile [CAN]) and 4, 5, 9, and additional 9 µl and 500 mM CAN (0.1% formic acid in 30% ACN). The mobile phases A and B were composed of 0 and 100% acetonitrile, respectively, and each contained 0.1% formic acid. The LC gradient began with 5% mobile phase B for 1 min and was ramped to 20% mobile phase B over 5 min, to 50% mobile phase B over 80 min, to 95% mobile phase B over 4 min, and remained at 95% mobile phase B over 10 min and 5% mobile phase B for another 5 min. The column was reequilibrated with 5% mobile phase B for 15 min before the next run. The voltage applied to produce an electrospray was 2.0 kV. During the chromatographic separation, the LTQ Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer was operated in a data-dependent mode. The MS data were acquired using the following parameters: five data-dependent collision-induced dissociation-high energy collision dissociation (CID-HCD) dual MS/MS scans per full scan; CID scans acquired in linear trap quadrupole (LTQ) with two-microscan averaging; full scans and HCD scans were acquired in Orbitrap at a resolution of 60,000 and 15,000, respectively, with two-microscan averaging; 35% normalized collision energy (NCE) in CID and 45% NCE in HCD; ±1-Da isolation window. Previously fragmented ions were excluded for 60 s. In CID-HCD dual scan, each selected parent ion was first fragmented by CID and then by HCD.

Protein identification and quantification.MS/MS spectra were analyzed using the following software analysis protocols with the protein sequence set of all C. tyrobutyricum proteins. The reversed sequences of all proteins were appended into the database for calculation of the false-discovery rate (FDR). ProLucid (49) was used to identify the peptides, with a precursor mass error of 25 ppm and a fragment ion mass error of 600 ppm. Trypsin was selected as the enzyme, with three potential missed cleavages. TMT modification (+ 229.1629) at the N terminus and lysine residue by the labeling reagent and carbamidomethylation at cysteine were chosen as static modifications. Oxidation at methionine was chosen as a variable modification. The CID and HCD tandem MS spectra from the same precursor ion are often combined by software to allow better peptide identification and quantification (50). We used a homemade software program where reporter ions from the HCD spectrum were inserted into the CID spectrum with the same precursor ion at the previous scan. Reporter ions were extracted from small windows (±20 ppm) around their expected m/z in the HCD spectrum. The output data files were filtered and sorted to compose the protein list using the DTASelect (51) with two and more peptide assignments for a protein identification and a false-positive rate of less than 0.01.

A quantitative analysis was conducted using Census in the IP2 pipeline (Integrated Proteomics, USA). The intensity at a reporter ion channel for a protein was calculated as the average of this reporter ion’s intensities from all constituent peptides from the identified protein (52). The measured intensity ratios of proteins were transformed to log2 scale. The resulting ratios were log transformed (base 2) in order to achieve a normal distribution.

In order to control quality in protein quantification, we labeled the same sample with two different TMT reagents. Since every protein was expected to have an abundance ratio of 1:1, in comparisons of different TMT-labeled samples for the same sample, data with more than 30% variation was excluded (for example, TMT-126 and TMT-129 for the C2 sample). TMT ratios for proteins were calculated over average reporter ion intensities over all peptides assigned to a protein subgroup. Proteins with P < 0.05 were defined as significantly changed in abundance. The false-discovery rate was performed by selecting a P value from the two biological replicates and ensuring that the fold change was significant in the other two conditions.

Inactivation of the cat1 gene using a mobile group II intron.A retargeted intron fragment was amplified using primers in Table S1 in the supplemental material and cloned into pCACYS3 according to the previous studies (17, 53). After verification of the intron sequence, the retargeted pCACYS3 plasmid was digested with XmaI, and the 3.9-kb fragment containing the whole L1.LtrA cassette was subcloned into the XmaI-digested pMTL82251 plasmid. The resulting plasmid was transferred to E. coli CA434 (donor strain) and finally transferred to C. tyrobutyricum by conjugation according to the previous reports (15, 54). After 12-h mating, transconjugants were selected onto 2× YTG agar containing 240 µg ml−1 of d-cycloserine and 50 µg ml−1 of erythromycin. Transconjugant colonies were streaked again onto selective agar to exclude donor E. coli cells, and gene disruption was confirmed by colony PCR.

Table S1 

Primers for gene knockout experiments. Table S1, DOC file, 0.04 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Preparation of cell-free extracts.Either C. tyrobutyricum or C. acetobutylicum cells were grown in 200 ml of the SP2 medium at 37°C. When OD600 reached about 1.0, the cells were harvested by centrifugation of 40 ml of the culture at 2,200 × g and 4°C for 15 min. The cells were washed once using distilled water, resuspended in 1 ml of 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4), and finally homogenized using a VC 750 sonicator (Sonics & Materials, CT). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 16,100 × g and 4°C for 10 min, and clear supernatants were used for enzyme assay. Total protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay.

Enzyme assay.Phosphotransbutyrylase activity was determined by measuring liberation of free CoA from butyryl-CoA (55). Butyrate kinase activity was determined in the butyryl-phosphate-forming direction by measuring butyrohydroxamic acid (56, 57). CoAT activity was measured in the acetyl-CoA-forming direction by the method of W. Buckel et al. (58), using butyryl-CoA and acetate as the substrates; formation of acetyl-CoA was determined by liberation of free CoA by a coupled citrate synthase reaction (58). An Ultrospec 3100 Pro spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare, United Kingdom) was used for the enzyme assay. One unit of the enzyme was defined as conversion of 1 μM substrates per min.

RNA isolation and RT-PCR.For RNA isolation for reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), all strains were cultivated in the anaerobic chamber at 37°C. An overnight 2× YTG culture of each C. tyrobutyricum strain was diluted 50 times into 200 ml of the SP2 medium (100 g liter−1 of initial glucose) contained in a 500-ml screw-cap flask and kept at 37°C until the OD600 reached 0.9 to 1.1. One milliliter of each SP2 culture was collected, and cells were harvested for 5 min at 4°C and 8,000 × g. RNA was isolated according to a hybrid protocol of an acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method using Easy-Red BYF (IntronBio, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea) and a spin column purification method using RNeasy mini (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Reverse transcription was performed using RocketScript RT premix (Bioneer, Daejeon, South Korea) according to the manufacturer’s protocol; 1 µg of total RNA and 100 pmol of random nonadeoxynucleotides (dN9) were subjected to a 20-µl RT reaction. When using gene-specific primers, 20 pmol of the reverse primer, which can bind to the target mRNA, was used instead of dN9. If required, DNase I was used to treat total RNA prior to RT reactions to destroy residual genomic DNA fragments. PCR was performed using the AccuPower PCR premix (Bioneer; 20-µl total reaction mixture volume). A T100 thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was used for all RT and PCRs throughout the study. The thiolase gene was chosen as an internal control of RT-PCR based on our shotgun proteome data (see Data Set S1 in the supplemental material). Primer sequences for PCR are described in Table S2 in the supplemental material.

Table S2 

Primers for RT-PCR. Table S2, DOC file, 0.03 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.The genome sequence for C. tyrobutyricum has been deposited at GenBank under the following accession numbers: CP014170 (chromosome) and CP014171 (plasmid).

Table S3 

Primers for amplifying the ptb gene from C. tyrobutyricum genomic DNA. Table S3, DOC file, 0.03 MB.
Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Nigel P. Minton at the University of Nottingham for kindly providing the E. coli CA434 strain and pMTL80000 modular plasmids.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation or the decision to submit the work for publication.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 28 April 2016
    • Accepted 4 May 2016
    • Published 14 June 2016
  • Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zhang C,
    2. Yang H,
    3. Yang F,
    4. Ma Y
    . 2009. Current progress on butyric acid production by fermentation. Curr Microbiol 59:656–663. doi:10.1007/s00284-009-9491-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Blank-Porat D,
    2. Gruss-Fischer T,
    3. Tarasenko N,
    4. Malik Z,
    5. Nudelman A,
    6. Rephaeli A
    . 2007. The anticancer prodrugs of butyric acid AN-7 and AN-9, possess antiangiogenic properties. Cancer Lett 256:39–48. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2007.05.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. D’Incecco P,
    2. Faoro F,
    3. Silvetti T,
    4. Schrader K,
    5. Pellegrino L
    . 2015. Mechanisms of Clostridium tyrobutyricum removal through natural creaming of milk: a microscopy study. J Dairy Sci 98:5164–5172. doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9526.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Morandi S,
    2. Cremonesi P,
    3. Silvetti T,
    4. Castiglioni B,
    5. Brasca M
    . 2015. Development of a triplex real-time PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of Clostridium beijerinckii, Clostridium sporogenes and Clostridium tyrobutyricum in milk. Anaerobe 34:44–49. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.04.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lavilla M,
    2. Marzo I,
    3. de Luis R,
    4. Perez MD,
    5. Calvo M,
    6. Sánchez L
    . 2010. Detection of Clostridium tyrobutyricum spores using polyclonal antibodies and flow cytometry. J Appl Microbiol 108:488–498. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04435.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Michel-Savin D,
    2. Marchal R,
    3. Vandecasteele JP
    . 1990. Butyrate production in continuous culture of Clostridium tyrobutyricum: effect of end-product inhibition. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:127–131. doi:10.1007/BF00176512.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Wu Z,
    2. Yang ST
    . 2003. Extractive fermentation for butyric acid production from glucose by Clostridium tyrobutyricum. Biotechnol Bioeng 82:93–102. doi:10.1002/bit.10542.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Zhu Y,
    2. Yang ST
    . 2004. Effect of pH on metabolic pathway shift in fermentation of xylose by Clostridium tyrobutyricum. J Biotechnol 110:143–157. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.02.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Jiang L,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Liang S,
    4. Wang X,
    5. Cen P,
    6. Xu Z
    . 2009. Butyric acid fermentation in a fibrous bed bioreactor with immobilized Clostridium tyrobutyricum from cane molasses. Bioresour Technol 100:3403–3409. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.032.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jiang L,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Liang S,
    4. Cai J,
    5. Xu Z
    . 2011. Control and optimization of Clostridium tyrobutyricum ATCC 25755 adhesion into fibrous matrix in a fibrous bed bioreactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 165:98–108. doi:10.1007/s12010-011-9236-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Zhu Y,
    3. Yang ST
    . 2006. Construction and characterization of ack deleted mutant of Clostridium tyrobutyricum for enhanced butyric acid and hydrogen production. Biotechnol Prog 22:1265–1275. doi:10.1021/bp060082g.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Zhu Y,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Yang ST
    . 2005. Construction and characterization of pta gene-deleted mutant of Clostridium tyrobutyricum for enhanced butyric acid fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 90:154–166. doi:10.1002/bit.20354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Yu M,
    3. Yang ST
    . 2012. Effects of ptb knockout on butyric acid fermentation by Clostridium tyrobutyricum. Biotechnol Prog 28:52–59. doi:10.1002/btpr.730.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wörner K,
    2. Szurmant H,
    3. Chiang C,
    4. Hoch JA
    . 2006. Phosphorylation and functional analysis of the sporulation initiation factor Spo0A from Clostridium botulinum. Mol Microbiol 59:1000–1012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04988.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Yu M,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Tang IC,
    4. Yang ST
    . 2011. Metabolic engineering of Clostridium tyrobutyricum for n-butanol production. Metab Eng 13:373–382. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2011.04.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yu M,
    2. Du Y,
    3. Jiang W,
    4. Chang WL,
    5. Yang ST,
    6. Tang IC
    . 2012. Effects of different replicons in conjugative plasmids on transformation efficiency, plasmid stability, gene expression and n-butanol biosynthesis in Clostridium tyrobutyricum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93:881–889. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3736-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Jang YS,
    2. Lee JY,
    3. Lee J,
    4. Park JH,
    5. Im JA,
    6. Eom MH,
    7. Lee J,
    8. Lee SH,
    9. Song H,
    10. Cho JH,
    11. Seung DY,
    12. Lee SY
    . 2012. Enhanced butanol production obtained by reinforcing the direct butanol-forming route in Clostridium acetobutylicum. mBio 3:e00314-12. doi:10.1128/mBio.00314-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hou X,
    2. Peng W,
    3. Xiong L,
    4. Huang C,
    5. Chen X,
    6. Chen X,
    7. Zhang W
    . 2013. Engineering Clostridium acetobutylicum for alcohol production. J Biotechnol 166:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.04.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lee SY,
    2. Kim HU
    . 2015. Systems strategies for developing industrial microbial strains. Nat Biotechnol 33:1061–1072. doi:10.1038/nbt.3365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Lee JW,
    2. Na D,
    3. Park JM,
    4. Lee J,
    5. Choi S,
    6. Lee SY
    . 2012. Systems metabolic engineering of microorganisms for natural and non-natural chemicals. Nat Chem Biol 8:536–546. doi:10.1038/nchembio.970.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bassi D,
    2. Fontana C,
    3. Gazzola S,
    4. Pietta E,
    5. Puglisi E,
    6. Cappa F,
    7. Cocconcelli PS
    . 2013. Draft genome sequence of Clostridium tyrobutyricum strain UC7086, isolated from Grana Padano cheese with late-blowing defect. Genome Announc 1:e00614-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00614-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jiang L,
    2. Zhu L,
    3. Xu X,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Li S,
    6. Huang H
    . 2013. Genome sequence of Clostridium tyrobutyricum ATCC 25755, a butyric acid-overproducing strain. Genome Announc 1:e00308-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00308-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ma C,
    2. Kojima K,
    3. Xu N,
    4. Mobley J,
    5. Zhou L,
    6. Yang ST,
    7. Liu XM
    . 2015. Comparative proteomics analysis of high n-butanol producing metabolically engineered Clostridium tyrobutyricum. J Biotechnol 193:108–119. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.10.036.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Rocha EP
    . 2004. The replication-related organization of bacterial genomes. Microbiology 150:1609–1627. doi:10.1099/mic.0.26974-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Seedorf H,
    2. Fricke WF,
    3. Veith B,
    4. Brüggemann H,
    5. Liesegang H,
    6. Strittmatter A,
    7. Miethke M,
    8. Buckel W,
    9. Hinderberger J,
    10. Li F,
    11. Hagemeier C,
    12. Thauer RK,
    13. Gottschalk G
    . 2008. The genome of Clostridium kluyveri, a strict anaerobe with unique metabolic features. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:2128–2133. doi:10.1073/pnas.0711093105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Saillard C,
    2. Carle P,
    3. Duret-Nurbel S,
    4. Henri R,
    5. Killiny N,
    6. Carrère S,
    7. Gouzy J,
    8. Bové JM,
    9. Renaudin J,
    10. Foissac X
    . 2008. The abundant extrachromosomal DNA content of the Spiroplasma citri GII3-3X genome. BMC Genomics 9:195. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Moriya Y,
    2. Itoh M,
    3. Okuda S,
    4. Yoshizawa AC,
    5. Kanehisa M
    . 2007. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W182–W185. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Sivagnanam K,
    2. Raghavan VG,
    3. Shah M,
    4. Hettich RL,
    5. Verberkmoes NC,
    6. Lefsrud MG
    . 2011. Comparative shotgun proteomic analysis of Clostridium acetobutylicum from butanol fermentation using glucose and xylose. Proteome Sci 9:66 doi:10.1186/1477-5956-9-66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lee J,
    2. Mitchell WJ,
    3. Tangney M,
    4. Blaschek HP
    . 2005. Evidence for the presence of an alternative glucose transport system in Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052 and the solvent-hyperproducing mutant BA101. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3384–3387. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.6.3384-3387.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Paredes CJ,
    2. Alsaker KV,
    3. Papoutsakis ET
    . 2005. A comparative genomic view of clostridial sporulation and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:969–978. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Jones SW,
    2. Paredes CJ,
    3. Tracy B,
    4. Cheng N,
    5. Sillers R,
    6. Senger RS,
    7. Papoutsakis ET
    . 2008. The transcriptional program underlying the physiology of clostridial sporulation. Genome Biol 9:R114. doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Selmer T,
    2. Willanzheimer A,
    3. Hetzel M
    . 2002. Propionate CoA-transferase from Clostridium propionicum. Cloning of gene and identification of glutamate 324 at the active site. Eur J Biochem 269:372–380. doi:10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02659.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Schmehl M,
    2. Jahn A,
    3. Meyer zu Vilsendorf A,
    4. Hennecke S,
    5. Masepohl B,
    6. Schuppler M,
    7. Marxer M,
    8. Oelze J,
    9. Klipp W
    . 1993. Identification of a new class of nitrogen fixation genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus: a putative membrane complex involved in electron transport to nitrogenase. Mol Gen Genet 241:602–615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Wang S,
    2. Huang H,
    3. Moll J,
    4. Thauer RK
    . 2010. NADP+ reduction with reduced ferredoxin and NADP+ reduction with NADH are coupled via an electron-bifurcating enzyme complex in Clostridium kluyveri. J Bacteriol 192:5115–5123. doi:10.1128/JB.00612-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Evans HJ,
    2. Wood HG
    . 1968. The mechanism of the pyruvate, phosphate dikinase reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 61:1448–1453. doi:10.1073/pnas.61.4.1448.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Al-Hinai MA,
    2. Jones SW,
    3. Papoutsakis ET
    . 2015. The Clostridium sporulation programs: diversity and preservation of endospore differentiation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79:19–37. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00025-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Steiner E,
    2. Dago AE,
    3. Young DI,
    4. Heap JT,
    5. Minton NP,
    6. Hoch JA,
    7. Young M
    . 2011. Multiple orphan histidine kinases interact directly with Spo0A to control the initiation of endospore formation in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Mol Microbiol 80:641–654. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07608.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Underwood S,
    2. Guan S,
    3. Vijayasubhash V,
    4. Baines SD,
    5. Graham L,
    6. Lewis RJ,
    7. Wilcox MH,
    8. Stephenson K
    . 2009. Characterization of the sporulation initiation pathway of Clostridium difficile and its role in toxin production. J Bacteriol 191:7296–7305. doi:10.1128/JB.00882-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Kirk DG,
    2. Dahlsten E,
    3. Zhang Z,
    4. Korkeala H,
    5. Lindström M
    . 2012. Involvement of Clostridium botulinum ATCC 3502 sigma factor K in early-stage sporulation. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4590–4596. doi:10.1128/AEM.00304-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Al-Hinai MA,
    2. Jones SW,
    3. Papoutsakis ET
    . 2014. σK of Clostridium acetobutylicum is the first known sporulation-specific sigma factor with two developmentally separated roles, one early and one late in sporulation. J Bacteriol 196:287–299. doi:10.1128/JB.01103-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Alsaker KV,
    2. Papoutsakis ET
    . 2005. Transcriptional program of early sporulation and stationary-phase events in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 187:7103–7118. doi:10.1128/JB.187.20.7103-7118.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Nagy Z,
    2. Chandler M
    . 2004. Regulation of transposition in bacteria. Res Microbiol 155:387–398. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2004.01.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Schellenberg JJ,
    2. Verbeke TJ,
    3. McQueen P,
    4. Krokhin OV,
    5. Zhang X,
    6. Alvare G,
    7. Fristensky B,
    8. Thallinger GG,
    9. Henrissat B,
    10. Wilkins JA,
    11. Levin DB,
    12. Sparling R
    . 2014. Enhanced whole genome sequence and annotation of Clostridium stercorarium DSM8532T using RNA-seq transcriptomics and high-throughput proteomics. BMC Genomics 15:567. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-567.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    1. Amador-Noguez D,
    2. Feng XJ,
    3. Fan J,
    4. Roquet N,
    5. Rabitz H,
    6. Rabinowitz JD
    . 2010. Systems-level metabolic flux profiling elucidates a complete, bifurcated tricarboxylic acid cycle in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 192:4452–4461. doi:10.1128/JB.00490-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Crown SB,
    2. Indurthi DC,
    3. Ahn WS,
    4. Choi J,
    5. Papoutsakis ET,
    6. Antoniewicz MR
    . 2011. Resolving the TCA cycle and pentose-phosphate pathway of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824: isotopomer analysis, in vitro activities and expression analysis. Biotechnol J 6:300–305. doi:10.1002/biot.201000282.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Ragsdale SW,
    2. Ljungdahl LG
    . 1984. Characterization of ferredoxin, flavodoxin, and rubredoxin from Clostridium formicoaceticum grown in media with high and low iron contents. J Bacteriol 157:1–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Li F,
    2. Hinderberger J,
    3. Seedorf H,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Buckel W,
    6. Thauer RK
    . 2008. Coupled ferredoxin and crotonyl coenzyme A (CoA) reduction with NADH catalyzed by the butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase/Etf complex from Clostridium kluyveri. J Bacteriol 190:843–850. doi:10.1128/JB.01417-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Washburn MP,
    2. Wolters D,
    3. Yates JR, III.
    . 2001. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol 19:242–247. doi:10.1038/85686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Carvalho PC,
    2. Xu T,
    3. Han X,
    4. Cociorva D,
    5. Barbosa VC,
    6. Yates JR, III.
    . 2009. YADA: a tool for taking the most out of high-resolution spectra. Bioinformatics 25:2734–2736. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp489.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Li N,
    2. Wu S,
    3. Zhang C,
    4. Chang C,
    5. Zhang J,
    6. Ma J,
    7. Li L,
    8. Qian X,
    9. Xu P,
    10. Zhu Y,
    11. He F
    . 2012. PepDistiller: a quality control tool to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of peptide identifications in shotgun proteomics. Proteomics 12:1720–1725. doi:10.1002/pmic.201100167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Tabb DL,
    2. McDonald WH,
    3. Yates JR, III.
    . 2002. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res 1:21–26. doi:10.1021/pr015504q.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Raso C,
    2. Cosentino C,
    3. Gaspari M,
    4. Malara N,
    5. Han X,
    6. McClatchy D,
    7. Park SK,
    8. Renne M,
    9. Vadalà N,
    10. Prati U,
    11. Cuda G,
    12. Mollace V,
    13. Amato F,
    14. Yates JR, III.
    . 2012. Characterization of breast cancer interstitial fluids by TmT labeling, LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometry, and pathway analysis. J Proteome Res 11:3199–3210. doi:10.1021/pr2012347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Heap JT,
    2. Pennington OJ,
    3. Cartman ST,
    4. Carter GP,
    5. Minton NP
    . 2007. The ClosTron: a universal gene knockout system for the genus Clostridium. J Microbiol Methods 70:452–464. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2007.05.021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Heap JT,
    2. Pennington OJ,
    3. Cartman ST,
    4. Minton NP
    . 2009. A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids. J Microbiol Methods 78:79–85. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2009.05.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    1. Wiesenborn DP,
    2. Rudolph FB,
    3. Papoutsakis ET
    . 1989. Phosphotransbutyrylase from Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 and its role in acidogenesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:317–322.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Rose IA
    . 1955. Acetate kinase of bacteria (acetokinase). Methods Enzymol 1:591–595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Huang KX,
    2. Huang S,
    3. Rudolph FB,
    4. Bennett GN
    . 2000. Identification and characterization of a second butyrate kinase from Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2:33–38.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Buckel W,
    2. Dorn U,
    3. Semmler R
    . 1981. Glutaconate CoA-transferase from Acidaminococcus fermentans. Eur J Biochem 118:315–321. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb06404.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Deciphering Clostridium tyrobutyricum Metabolism Based on the Whole-Genome Sequence and Proteome Analyses
Joungmin Lee, Yu-Sin Jang, Mee-Jung Han, Jin Young Kim, Sang Yup Lee
mBio Jun 2016, 7 (3) e00743-16; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00743-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Deciphering Clostridium tyrobutyricum Metabolism Based on the Whole-Genome Sequence and Proteome Analyses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Deciphering Clostridium tyrobutyricum Metabolism Based on the Whole-Genome Sequence and Proteome Analyses
Joungmin Lee, Yu-Sin Jang, Mee-Jung Han, Jin Young Kim, Sang Yup Lee
mBio Jun 2016, 7 (3) e00743-16; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00743-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511