Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article

Deacetylation of Fungal Exopolysaccharide Mediates Adhesion and Biofilm Formation

Mark J. Lee, Alexander M. Geller, Natalie C. Bamford, Hong Liu, Fabrice N. Gravelat, Brendan D. Snarr, François Le Mauff, Joseé Chabot, Benjamin Ralph, Hanna Ostapska, Mélanie Lehoux, Robert P. Cerone, Stephanie D. Baptista, Evgeny Vinogradov, Jason E. Stajich, Scott G. Filler, P. Lynne Howell, Donald C. Sheppard
Joseph Heitman, Editor
Mark J. Lee
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander M. Geller
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalie C. Bamford
cProgram in Molecular Structure & Function, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
dDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Liu
bDivision of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Medical Institute at Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabrice N. Gravelat
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
gInfectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brendan D. Snarr
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
gInfectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
François Le Mauff
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
gInfectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseé Chabot
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
gInfectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Ralph
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
gInfectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanna Ostapska
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
gInfectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mélanie Lehoux
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
gInfectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert P. Cerone
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie D. Baptista
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evgeny Vinogradov
eNational Research Council, Ottawa, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason E. Stajich
fDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jason E. Stajich
Scott G. Filler
bDivision of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Medical Institute at Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Lynne Howell
cProgram in Molecular Structure & Function, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
dDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald C. Sheppard
aDepartments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
gInfectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Heitman
Duke University
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00252-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1 

    Bacterial polysaccharide biosynthetic operons and the putative GAG biosynthetic gene cluster. (A to C) Schematic of the ica operon responsible for the synthesis of polysaccharide intercellular adhesion (PIA) (A), pga operon responsible for the synthesis of PNAG [poly-(β1-6)-N-acetyl-d-glucosamine] (B), and the putative GAG gene cluster (C). (D) Heatmap showing differential gene expression of the A. fumigatus ΔmedA and ΔstuA regulatory mutants compared to wild-type A. fumigatus, highlighting the coregulation of the genes in the GAG biosynthesis gene cluster. Fold induction is shown in red (upregulation), green (downregulation), black (no change), and gray (missing data point). Locus ID, locus identification.

  • FIG 2 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2 

    Comparative models and in silico analysis. (A) Comparative models of exopolysaccharide synthesis in bacteria and fungi. The numbered steps are as follows: (step 1) polymerization of sugar residues by the glycosyltransferases indicated in green (Gtb3, IcaA, and PgaC), (step 2) extrusion of the elongating polysaccharide from the cytosolic side to the extracellular side (or periplasm in Gram-negative bacteria) by the dual action of the glycosyltransferase (Gtb3, IcaA, and PgaC) and associated protein for the bacterial species (IcaD and PgaD), and (step 3) deacetylation of the N-acetylhexosamine unit of the nascent polysaccharide by the de-N-acetylase indicated in dark red (Agd3, IcaB, and PgaB). The extracellular matrix (ECM), cell wall (CW), plasma membrane (M), peptidoglycan (PG), outer membrane (OM), and inner membrane (IM) are shown. CoA, coenzyme A. (B) Predicted domains and conserved regions in the Agd3 protein. From the N terminus, these domains include signal peptide (SS), a serine-rich region, a glutamine amidotransferase domain (reductase), metal-coordinating linear motifs (MT1/MT2), β/α barrel, a carbohydrate esterase-4 like domain (CE 4), and a β-strand-rich region. (C) Multiple-sequence alignment showing conserved DXD/DD motif located within the MT1 and MT2 conserved sites. Sequences include S. epidermidis IcaB, E. coli PgaB, P. aeruginosa PelA, and Sinorhizobium meliloti NodB. Highly conserved and similar residues are highlighted in dark and light gray, respectively. Gaps introduced to maximize alignment are indicated by hyphens.

  • FIG 3 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3 

    Deletion of agd3 blocks deacetylation of GAG. (A) Detection of primary amine of purified GAG from the strains indicated in the figure as measured by evolution of colorimetric byproduct of the TNBS reaction. O.D., optical density. (B) 1H NMR analysis of purified GAG from the indicated strains. Black arrows indicate the detection of the hydrogen resonance peak originating from galactosamine. (C) Total secreted GAG production by the indicated strains. (D) Comparison of relative expression of GAG cluster genes between wild-type Af293 and Δagd3 mutant as measured against reference gene tef1 under various growth conditions (RPMI 1640 supplemented with MOPS [RPMI-MOPS], Brian medium, Aspergillus minimal medium [AspMM]). For anaerobic growth, additional reference genes, actin 1, and β-tubulin were also used. For all graphs, data are represented as means plus standard errors of the means (SEM) (error bars). The values of the wild-type A. fumigatus Af293 and the Δagd3 mutant strain were significantly different (P < 0.05 by analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Tukey’s test for pairwise comparison) as indicated by the asterisk.

  • FIG 4 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4 

    Deletion of agd3 is associated with loss of adherence and changes in the cell wall. (A) Formation of adherent biofilms by the strains indicated in the figure on either positively charged (poly-d-lysine-treated [PDL]) or negatively charged (tissue culture-treated polystyrene [TC]) surfaces. Biofilms were washed and visualized by staining with crystal violet (gray). (B) Confocal microscopy images of hyphae stained with FITC-tagged soybean agglutinin lectin (top) and corresponding differential interference contrast (DIC) (bottom). (C) Scanning electron micrographs of hyphae grown for 24 h. The white arrows point to hyphal surface decorations associated with GAG production. (D) Confocal microscopy images of hyphae stained with Fc-dectin-1 detected by FITC-tagged Fc-receptor antibody (top) and corresponding DIC (bottom).

  • FIG 5 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5 

    Agd3 activity augments the positive charge on the surfaces of hyphae. The graph shows the percentage of negatively charged Sephadex beads bound by hyphae of the indicated strains. Data are presented as means plus standard errors of the means (SEM) (error bars). The values for the indicated mutant strains were significantly different (P < 0.05 by ANOVA with Tukey’s test for pairwise comparison) from the value for wild-type A. fumigatus Af293 strain as indicated by the asterisk. The value for the Δagd3::agd3 strain was not significantly different (n.s.) from the value for the wild-type A. fumigatus Af293 strain.

  • FIG 6 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6 

    Agd3 is required for full virulence in a mouse model of invasive aspergillosis. (A) Survival of BALB/c mice treated with cortisone and cyclophosphamide and then infected with the indicated conidial strains. Graphs are the combined results of two independent experiments with 26 mice per group for all groups of mice infected with fungal strains and 24 mice in the PBS sham infection group. There was a significant difference in the survival of mice infected with wild-type Af293 or Δagd3::agd3 strain compared to those infected with the Δagd3 strain as determined by the Mantel-Cox log rank test with pairwise comparison applying Bonferroni’s correction as indicated by the asterisk. (B) Pulmonary histopathology sections from BALB/c mice infected with indicated strains and stained with PAS for visualization of fungal elements. Black arrows indicate fungal elements found within pulmonary lesions. Bars, 100 µm. (C) Pulmonary fungal burden of mice infected with the indicated strains, as measured by quantitative PCR. There were 8 mice in each group. (D) Pulmonary fungal burden of mice infected with the indicated strains, as measured by determination of pulmonary galactomannan content. There were 8 mice in each group. (E) Pulmonary injury as measured by lactose dehydrogenase activity in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of mice infected with the indicated strains. There were 8 mice in each group. Values are medians plus interquartile ranged (error bars). There was a significant difference in either the fungal burden or lung injury in mice infected with wild-type Af293 strain and those infected with the Δagd3 mutant strain as determined by the Mann-Whitney test as indicated by the § symbol.

  • FIG 7 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7 

    Culture filtrates from the Δuge3 mutant complement the defects in adherence and cell wall morphology of Δagd3 mutant. (A) Biofilm formation by the indicated strains grown alone or in coculture. After the biofilm was washed, adherent biofilm was visualized by crystal violet staining. (B) Biofilm formation by the indicated strains grown in the presence of culture filtrates (C/F) from the Δuge3 or Δagd3 mutant. After the biofilm was washed, adherent biofilm was visualized by crystal violet staining. (C) Scanning electron microscopy visualization of cell wall morphology of the indicated strains grown in the presence of culture filtrates from the Δuge3 mutant. The white arrows indicate cell wall decorations associated with cell wall-bound GAG.

  • FIG 8 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 8 

    Agd3 localizes to the surfaces of hyphae. Hyphae expressing an Agd3-RFP fusion protein are visualized by confocal microscopy and indirect immunofluorescence.

  • FIG 9 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 9 

    Agd3 orthologs are found within a wide range of Ascomyces species. A gene tree is shown categorized by taxonomic class of Agd3 orthologs found in the 28 fungal species that possess the GAG gene cluster. The gene tree was built by aligning and trimming Agd3 ortholog sequences, followed by maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis with 100 bootstrap replicates. The outgroup was rooted with sequences of Arthrobotrys species. The scale bar is the genetic distance representing amino acid substitutions per site.

  • FIG 10 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 10 

    Trichosporon asahii produces a GAG-like exopolysaccharide. Hyphae of T. asahii were stained with FITC-tagged soybean agglutinin (SBA) lectin binding for the detection of GalNAc-rich exopolysaccharide.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Figure S1 

    Deletion of agd3 does not affect susceptibility to caspofungin or nikkomycin. Hyphae of the indicated strains were grown in the presence of caspofungin and nikkomycin. No difference in sensitivity to antifungal agents was observed between the indicated strains, and no morphological differences were observed between hyphae of these strains at subinhibitory concentrations of caspofungin (0.25 µg/ml) or nikkomycin (0.032 µg/ml). The magnification for all images is ×200. Download Figure S1, TIF file, 2 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • Figure S2 

    Deletion of agd3 increase dectin-1 binding on the hyphal surface. The average pixel quantification of fluorescence in Fig. 4D was measured using ImageJ. Download Figure S2, TIF file, 2 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • Figure S3 

    Culture filtrates from the Δuge3 mutant complement the defects in the production of functional GAG of the Δagd3 mutant. Adherent, deacetylated GAG in culture supernatants of the indicated strains was detected by indirect ELISA. Values are means plus standard errors of the means (SEM) (error bars). The values for strains that are significantly different from the value for wild-type A. fumigatus Af293 strain (P < 0.05 by ANOVA with Tukey’s test for pairwise comparison) are indicated by an asterisk. The values for wild-type A. fumigatus and the other Δagd3 mutant strain were not statistically significantly different (n.s.). Download Figure S3, TIF file, 1.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • Figure S4 

    Detection of Agd3 in mycelia and culture supernatants by Western blotting. Culture supernatant or biomass was harvested from cultures of the indicated strains after 24-h growth. Proteins from each fraction were immunoblotted for detection of RFP. Samples obtained from two independent growth and extraction experiments are shown. Lanes: 1, wild-type Af293 culture supernatant; 2, wild-type Af293 biomass; 3, Agd3-RFP strain culture supernatant; 4, Agd3-RFP strain biomass; 5, recombinant RFP; 6, Agd3-RFP strain culture supernatant; 7, Agd3-RFP strain biomass. The positions of molecular weight (MW) markers (in thousands) are indicated to the right of the blot. Download Figure S4, TIF file, 2 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • Figure S5 

    Schematic of the GAG biosynthetic cluster in multiple fungi illustrating the degree of synteny of the cluster genes. Each arrow represents a predicted gene product required for GAG synthesis (yellow) or another putative functional or hypothetical protein (blue). A star indicates a small peptide/protein typically less than 100 amino acids with a predicted open reading frame. The direction of the arrow indicates the direction of predicted transcription. Download Figure S5, TIF file, 2.4 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • Table S1 

    List of pathogenic species in which the GAG gene cluster was identified. Table S1, XLSX file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • Table S2 

    List of primers. Table S2, XLSX file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2016 Lee et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • Supplementary Data

    Supplementary Data

    • Figure sf1, TIF - Figure sf1, TIF
    • Figure sf2, TIF - Figure sf2, TIF
    • Figure sf3, TIF - Figure sf3, TIF
    • Figure sf4, TIF - Figure sf4, TIF
    • Figure sf5, TIF - Figure sf5, TIF
    • Table st1, XLSX - Table st1, XLSX
    • Table st2, XLSX - Table st2, XLSX
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Deacetylation of Fungal Exopolysaccharide Mediates Adhesion and Biofilm Formation
Mark J. Lee, Alexander M. Geller, Natalie C. Bamford, Hong Liu, Fabrice N. Gravelat, Brendan D. Snarr, François Le Mauff, Joseé Chabot, Benjamin Ralph, Hanna Ostapska, Mélanie Lehoux, Robert P. Cerone, Stephanie D. Baptista, Evgeny Vinogradov, Jason E. Stajich, Scott G. Filler, P. Lynne Howell, Donald C. Sheppard
mBio Apr 2016, 7 (2) e00252-16; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00252-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Deacetylation of Fungal Exopolysaccharide Mediates Adhesion and Biofilm Formation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Deacetylation of Fungal Exopolysaccharide Mediates Adhesion and Biofilm Formation
Mark J. Lee, Alexander M. Geller, Natalie C. Bamford, Hong Liu, Fabrice N. Gravelat, Brendan D. Snarr, François Le Mauff, Joseé Chabot, Benjamin Ralph, Hanna Ostapska, Mélanie Lehoux, Robert P. Cerone, Stephanie D. Baptista, Evgeny Vinogradov, Jason E. Stajich, Scott G. Filler, P. Lynne Howell, Donald C. Sheppard
mBio Apr 2016, 7 (2) e00252-16; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00252-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511