Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article

Shigella flexneri Regulation of ARF6 Activation during Bacterial Entry via an IpgD-Mediated Positive Feedback Loop

Anna Cristina Garza-Mayers, Kelly A. Miller, Brian C. Russo, Dipal V. Nagda, Marcia B. Goldberg
Jeff F. Miller, Editor
Anna Cristina Garza-Mayers
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly A. Miller
bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian C. Russo
bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dipal V. Nagda
bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcia B. Goldberg
aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeff F. Miller
UCLA School of Medicine
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02584-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1 

    ARF6 is required for efficient entry of S. flexneri. (A) Efficiency of infection of HeLa cells transfected with ARF6-HA or dominant negative ARF6 N122I-HA. Number of intracellular bacteria per cell at 2 h of infection, by differential staining. (B) S. flexneri recovered after infection (1 or 2 h) of ARF6K/D or ARF6+ MEFs, by gentamicin protection assay. (C and D, left graph) Early infection (40 min) of ARF6K/D or ARF6+ MEFs, with differential staining of extracellular versus intracellular bacteria. Extracellular bacteria stained with antibody to LPS (green) and all bacteria identified by DAPI (DNA, blue). Phalloidin staining of polymerized actin (red). Images are representative. Arrows, intracellular bacteria. Arrowheads, extracellular bacteria. Bar, 10 µm. (D, right graph) Rescue of S. flexneri entry by transient transfection of ARF6K/D MEFs with ARF6-HA. Efficiency of entry into ARF6-HA-transfected cells was for the subset of cells that expressed ARF6-HA. Mean ± standard error of the mean of at least 3 independent experiments.

  • FIG 2 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2 

    Virulent S. flexneri activates ARF6 early during infection. (A) ARF6 activation determined by pulldown of GTP-bound ARF6 from HeLa cells 20 or 40 min after initial contact of WT or noninvasive S. flexneri (top panel) with cells, versus total ARF6 in each lysate (bottom panel). GTPγS or GDP added to lysates of uninfected cells and uninfected cells alone (uninfect) are positive and negative controls. Ratio of ARF6-GTP to total ARF6 for blots shown, by densitometry. Blots are representative. (B and C) ARF6-HA recruitment to AFA-I-expressing WT or noninvasive S. flexneri in HeLa cells infected (40 min), fixed, and stained with antibody to HA (green), DAPI (blue), and phalloidin (red). ND, not detectable. Mean ± standard error of the mean for 3 independent experiments. Images are representative. Arrows, ARF6 recruitment to entering bacteria. Arrowheads, bacteria without ARF6 recruitment. Bar, 10 µm.

  • FIG 3 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3 

    The phosphoinositide phosphatase activity of Shigella T3SS effector IpgD is required for efficient ARF6 activation at entry sites. (A) ARF6 activation determined by pulldown of GTP-bound ARF6 from HeLa cells infected with indicated S. flexneri strains for 40 min after initial bacterial contact with cells (top panel) versus total ARF6 in each lysate (bottom panel). Ratio of ARF6-GTP to total ARF6 for blots shown, by densitometry. Uninfect, uninfected; Non-invas, noninvasive strain; ΔipgB1 ΔB2, ΔipgB1 ΔipgB2 mutant. Blots are representative. (B to E) Infection of ARF6-HA-transfected HeLa cells (40 min) with WT, ΔipgD, ΔipgD pIpgD, or ΔipgD pIpgD C438S S. flexneri, fixed and labeled with antibody to HA (green), DAPI (blue), and phalloidin (red). (B) Percentage of cells with bacteria associated that show ARF6 recruitment to bacteria. (C) Representative images. Arrows, bacteria with ARF6 recruitment. Arrowheads, bacteria without ARF6 recruitment. Bar, 10 µM. (D and E) Percentage of cells infected or with ruffles. Mean ± standard error of the mean of at least 3 independent experiments.

  • FIG 4 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4 

    Efficient ARF6 recruitment to entering S. flexneri requires cytohesin GEFs. Recruitment of ARF6-HA to HeLa cells infected with S. flexneri for 40 min in the presence of SecinH3 or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). (A) Percentage of cells infected. (B) Percentage of cells with ruffles. (C) Percentage of cells with bacteria associated showing ARF6 recruitment to bacteria. Mean ± standard error of the mean of at least 3 independent experiments. (D) Representative images with labeling with antibody to HA (green), DAPI (blue), and phalloidin (red). Arrows, bacteria with ARF6 recruitment. Arrowheads, bacteria without ARF6 recruitment. Bar, 10 µm.

  • FIG 5 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5 

    ARNO is recruited to entering S. flexneri independent of ARF6. (A and B) Recruitment of Myc-ARNO 3G to AFA-I-expressing WT or noninvasive S. flexneri in HeLa cells, infected for 30 min. Representative images labeled with antibody to Myc (green), DAPI (blue), and phalloidin (red). (C and D) Recruitment of Myc-ARNO 2G or Myc-ARNO 3G to S. flexneri entering ARF6K/D or ARF6+ MEFs, infected for 25 min. Labeling as in panel B. Arrows, entering bacteria with ARNO recruitment. Arrowheads, bacteria without ARNO recruitment. ND, not detectable. NS, not significant. Mean ± standard error of the mean of at least 3 independent experiments. Bars, 10 µm.

  • FIG 6 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6 

    IpgD phosphatase activity is required for ARNO recruitment to entry sites, and PI 3-kinase contributes to ARNO 2G but not ARNO 3G recruitment. (A and B) WT, ΔipgD, ΔipgD pIpgD, and ΔipgD pIpgD C438S S. flexneri infection for 30 min of HeLa cells transfected with Myc-ARNO 3G. (A) Percentage of cells with ARNO recruitment to entering bacteria. (B) Representative images, labeled with antibody to Myc (green), DAPI (blue), and phalloidin (red). (C and D) Recruitment of PI(3,4,5)P3 to bacterial entry sites upon WT or ΔipgD infection for 40 min of HeLa cells transfected with BTK-PH-GFP, which specifically binds PI(3,4,5)P3. (C) Percentage of cells with BTK-PH-GFP recruitment to entering bacteria. (D) Representative images, labeled with DAPI (blue), and phalloidin (red), and with GFP signal. (E and F) Inhibition of recruitment of ARNO 2G, but not ARNO 3G, upon treatment with LY294002 upon WT infection of ARF6K/D MEFs for 25 min. (E) Percentage of cells with ARNO recruitment to entering bacteria. (F) Representative images, labeled as in panel B. Arrows, bacteria with ARNO recruitment. Arrowheads, bacteria without ARNO recruitment. Bars, 10 µm. NS, not significant. Mean ± standard error of the mean of at least 3 independent experiments. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; LY, LY294002.

  • FIG 7 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7 

    Model of IpgD-dependent positive feedback loop that amplifies ARF6 activation during entry of S. flexneri. Extracellular S. flexneri recruits ARNO to the plasma membrane in part via IpgD-induced local accumulation of PI(3,4,5)P3. ARNO-dependent activation of ARF6 induces PIP5K-mediated changes in phosphoinositide composition at the membrane that promote additional ARNO recruitment, mediating further activation of ARF6. Solid arrows, relationships supported by data presented here or previously published. Dashed arrows, postulated relationships.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1 

    Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

    Strain or plasmidGenotype or descriptionReference or source
    Bacterial strains
         Wild typeSerotype 2a S. flexneri strain 2457t68
         NoninvasiveBS103 (2457T cured of its virulence plasmid)71
         Wild type with adhesin2457T pIL22, AmprLab stock
         Noninvasive with adhesinBS103 pIL22, AmprLab stock
         ΔipgD mutant2457T ipgD::FRT-Kmr-FRTaGift of C. Lesser
         ΔipgD pIpgD mutant2457T ipgD::FRT-Kmr-FRT pACYC184 ipgD-ipgEThis study
         ΔipgD pIpgD C438S mutant2457T ipgD::FRT-Kmr-FRT pACYC184 ipgD C438S-ipgEThis study
         ΔipgB1 mutant2457T ipgB1::FRTLab stock
         ΔipgB1 ΔipgB2 mutant2457T ipgB1::FRT ipgB2::FRTLab stock
         ΔipaJ mutant2457T ipaJ::FRTLab stock
    Plasmids
         pACYC184CmrLab stock
         pIpgDpACYC184 ipgD-ipgE, CmrThis study
         pIpgD C438SpACYC184 ipgD C438S-ipgE, CmrThis study
         pIL22pBR322 encoding Escherichia coli afimbrial adhesin AFA-I, Ampr72
         ARF6-HApcDNA HA-tagged ARF6, Ampr21
         ARF6 N122I-HApcDNA HA-tagged ARF6 defective for nucleotide binding, Ampr21
         BTK-PH-GFPpEGFP-N1-BTK-PH-GFP, Kmr51
         Myc-ARNO 3GpcDNA3 Myc-tagged ARNO, 3G variant, Ampr29
         Myc-ARNO 2GpcDNA3 Myc-tagged ARNO, 2G variant, AmprGift of L. Santy
    • ↵a FRT, FLP recombination target.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure S1 

    Arf6 knockdown. Whole-cell lysates of ARF6K/D and ARF6+ MEFs, transfected with ARF6-HA where indicated. Immunoblotting with ARF6 or β-actin antibodies. Download Figure S1, TIF file, 0.6 MB.

    Copyright © 2015 Garza-Mayers et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

  • Figure S2 

    S. flexneri recruits ARF6 to entry sites in MEFs. (A) Recruitment of ARF6-HA to WT or noninvasive S. flexneri in ARF6+ MEFs infected for 25 min. ND, not detectable. Mean ± standard error of the mean of 3 independent experiments. (B) Representative images, labeled with antibody to HA (green), DAPI (blue), and phalloidin (red). Arrows, entering bacteria with ARF6 recruitment. Arrowheads, bacteria without ARF6 recruitment. Bar, 10 µm. Download Figure S2, TIF file, 2.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2015 Garza-Mayers et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

  • Figure S3 

    IpgD production in complemented ΔipgD S. flexneri. Congo red-induced secretion of S. flexneri strains. Pellets and precipitated supernatants immunoblotted with antibodies to IpgD or DnaK. Download Figure S3, TIF file, 0.2 MB.

    Copyright © 2015 Garza-Mayers et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

  • Figure S4 

    Recruitment of ARF6-HA to entering bacteria following siRNA depletion of ARNO in HeLa cells. (A) Depletion of ARNO by siRNA. Immunoblotting with ARNO or β-actin antibodies. (B) Percentage of cells with bacteria associated showing ARF6-HA recruitment to bacteria. Mean ± standard error of the mean of at least 3 independent experiments. NS, not significant. Download Figure S4, TIF file, 1.4 MB.

    Copyright © 2015 Garza-Mayers et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

  • Figure S5 

    In cells transfected with ARNO constructs, IpgD phosphatase activity is required for efficient S. flexneri entry and ruffle formation. (A) Percentage of cells infected. (B) Percentage of cells with ruffles. Mean ± standard error of the mean of at least 3 independent experiments. Download Figure S5, TIF file, 0.3 MB.

    Copyright © 2015 Garza-Mayers et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

  • Figure S6 

    LY294002 treatment that inhibits recruitment of ARNO 2G is associated with inhibition of Akt activation. Levels of phospho-Akt S473 and total Akt under conditions used for data presented in Fig. 6. Western blotting with β-actin as loading control. Download Figure S6, TIF file, 0.2 MB.

    Copyright © 2015 Garza-Mayers et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • Supplementary Data

    Supplementary Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Figure sf1, TIF - Figure sf1, TIF
    • Figure sf2, TIF - Figure sf2, TIF
    • Figure sf3, TIF - Figure sf3, TIF
    • Figure sf4, TIF - Figure sf4, TIF
    • Figure sf5, TIF - Figure sf5, TIF
    • Figure sf6, TIF - Figure sf6, TIF
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Shigella flexneri Regulation of ARF6 Activation during Bacterial Entry via an IpgD-Mediated Positive Feedback Loop
Anna Cristina Garza-Mayers, Kelly A. Miller, Brian C. Russo, Dipal V. Nagda, Marcia B. Goldberg
mBio Mar 2015, 6 (2) e02584-14; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02584-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Shigella flexneri Regulation of ARF6 Activation during Bacterial Entry via an IpgD-Mediated Positive Feedback Loop
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Shigella flexneri Regulation of ARF6 Activation during Bacterial Entry via an IpgD-Mediated Positive Feedback Loop
Anna Cristina Garza-Mayers, Kelly A. Miller, Brian C. Russo, Dipal V. Nagda, Marcia B. Goldberg
mBio Mar 2015, 6 (2) e02584-14; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02584-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511