Article Figures & Data
- TABLE 1
Overview of A. flavus GPCRs
Gene Gene ID (AFLA_x) No. of amino acids Class Conserved domain (note) No. of TM domainsa gprA 060740 374 I STE2 GPCR (S. cerevisiae pheromone receptor) 6/7 gprB 061620 465 II STE3 GPCR (S. cerevisiae pheromone receptor) 7/7 gprC 074150 444 III Git3; Git3_C (S. pombe glucose receptor) 7/6 gprD 135680 415 III Git3; Git3_C (S. pombe glucose receptor) 7/7 gprF 006880 300 IV PQ loop repeat (S. pombe nitrogen sensor) 4/5 gprG 067770 426 IV PQ loop repeat (S. pombe nitrogen sensor) 7/7 gprH 006920 428 V Secretin family (signal through cAMP pathways) 7/7 gprJ 127870 322 IV PQ loop repeat (S. pombe nitrogen sensor) 7/7 gprK 009790 560 VI RGS domain (regulator of G protein signaling) 7/7 gprM 075000 490 VII [No conserved domains] 7/7 gprO 032130 282 VIII Hemolysin III related (broad range of ligands) 6/7 gprP 088190 502 VIII Hemolysin III related (broad range of ligands) 7/7 gprR 023070 523 VI RGS domain (regulator of G protein signaling) 7/7 gprS 006320 266 IV PQ loop repeat (S. pombe nitrogen sensor) 7/7 nopA 117970 312 IX Bacteriorhodopsin-like (photoreactive) 7/7 ↵a The first number is predicted by TMHMM; the second is predicted by TopPred.
- TABLE 2
Developmental phenotypes of A. flavus Δgpr mutantsa
a GPCR mutants were assayed for germination rate at 4 to 9 h postinoculation and for aflatoxin (AF) production on AF-promoting (YES) and AF-repressing (YEP) media. For both assays, shaded squares represent data points that were significantly different from those for the wild type (WT). The color of each box indicates the amount of germinated spores or AF produced as a percentage of WT germination or AF produced. The ratios of spores produced under light and dark conditions (L/D), as well as spores and sclerotia produced by high-density (H) and low-density (L) inocula, were determined, and any data point that did not exhibit the same pattern as the WT is shaded gray. For all four experiments, statistical significance was determined by a Student t test, with P < 0.05. Deletions are shown in the “Strain” column.
- TABLE 3
Growth of A. flavus Δgpr mutants on various carbon and nitrogen sourcesa
a Strains were grown on a variety of media with different sources of carbon and nitrogen. The radial growth was measured, and mutants were compared to the WT on the same medium. The carbon sources were glucose (Glu), galactose (Gal), xylose (Xyl), sucrose (Suc), corn oil, and corn oil with glucose. The nitrogen sources were peptone (Pep), ammonium chloride, and proline (Pro). Shaded boxes indicate data points that were significantly different from those for the WT, with the color representing the degree of growth inhibition compared to the WT. Significance was determined by a Student t test, with P < 0.05. Deletions are shown in the “Strain” column.
- TABLE 4
Stress responses of A. flavus Δgpr mutantsa
a Strains were exposed to a variety of stresses, including reactive oxygen species (ROS), cell wall stress, osmolarity stress, and high and low pHs. Percent inhibition of growth under stress versus growth on control medium (GMM) was measured. Shaded boxes indicate data points in which the percent inhibition of the mutant differed significantly from that of the WT, and the degree of the difference is indicated by the different colors. Darker red tones indicate mutants with greater sensitivity to the stressor, while darker blue tones denote the opposite. Significance was determined by a Student t test, with P < 0.05. Deletions are shown in the “Strain” column.
- TABLE 5
A. flavus Δgpr mutant responses to fatty acids and oxylipinsa
a Strains were incubated with or without MeJA, a repressor of AF biosynthesis, and AF was extracted and measured by HPLC. Strains were also exposed to disks soaked with the sporulation inducers 13(S)-HpODE and linoleic acid or the negative control ethanol (EtOH), and spores surrounding the disks were counted. Shaded boxes represent data points that did not exhibit the WT response, and the mutant response is indicated (“NR” means “no response”). Statistical significance was determined by a Student’s t test with P < 0.05. Deletions are shown in the “Strain” column.
- TABLE 6
Expression of GPCR-encoding genes under various conditionsa
a Expression data from several different studies were mined for expression levels of the GPCRs under various conditions. For each data set, the log2-fold change (FC) value and P value (p val.) are reported. The first four data sets contain microarray data, while the last two contain RNA-seq data. The first data set (“Maize/mycelia”) reports the FC in expression from A. flavus grown as mycelia in liquid culture to A. flavus grown on maize. The second (“Wheat/maize”) reports the FC in expression from A. flavus growing on maize to A. flavus growing on wheat. The third (“Germ/endosperm”) reports the FC in expression from A. flavus growing on the corn kernel endosperm to growth on the kernel germ. The fifth and sixth data sets (“Mycelia/sclerotia”) report the FC in expression from A. flavus growing as mycelia to producing sclerotia. The final data set reports the FC in expression from untreated A. flavus cultures to those exposed to 5-AC.
- TABLE 7
Potential roles of A. flavus GPCRs
Strain description Predicted role(s) Observed role(s) ΔgprA Mating Germination; AF repression; carbon source sensing; oxylipin sensing ΔgprB Mating Germination; quorum sensing; MeJA sensing ΔgprC Glucose sensing Germination; carbon and nitrogen sensing; 13(S)-HpODE sensing ΔgprD Glucose sensing Nitrogen sensing; ROS, cell wall, acidic pH stress response; 13(S)-HpODE sensing ΔgprF Nitrogen sensing Light sensing; quorum sensing; acidic pH stress response; oxylipin sensing ΔgprG Nitrogen sensing ROS and acidic pH stress responses; oxylipin sensing ΔgprH Methionine sensing Germination; ROS stress response ΔgprJ Nitrogen sensing Germination; carbon sensing; 13(S)-HpODE sensing ΔgprK Unknown Germination; carbon sensing; cell wall, osmotic, and acidic stress response, MeJA sensing ΔgprM Unknown Carbon sensing; osmotic and pH stress responses; MeJA sensing ΔgprO Unknown Oxylipin sensing ΔgprP Unknown Germination; AF repression; carbon sensing; oxylipin sensing ΔgprR Unknown Germination; light sensing; carbon and nitrogen sensing; osmotic and alkaline pH stress responses; lipid and oxylipin sensing ΔgprS Nitrogen sensing Germination; cell wall stress response; MeJA sensing ΔnopA Light sensing Unknown
Supplemental Material
Figure S1
Alignment of fungal GPCRs. GPCR protein sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega, and a phylogenetic tree was generated using Phylogeny.fr. A. flavus GPCRs are colored red. Download Figure S1, TIF file, 0.8 MB.
Copyright © 2014 Affeldt et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Figure S2
Confirmation of disruption of GPCR-encoding genes. Disruption of each GPCR was confirmed by Southern blotting. For all blots, strain TKJA13.1 was used as the wild type, though for several blots, the probe did not hybridize to the wild-type DNA. The expected band sizes are as follows: gprA, WT = 8.5, 2.8 kb; Δ = 7.8, 2.8, 1.6 kb; gprB, WT = 10.4, 4.0 kb; Δ = 8.9, 4.0, 1.8 kb; gprC, WT = 5.3, 2.1 kb; Δ = 4.9, 2.1, 1.1 kb; gprD, WT = 6.1, 2.3 kb; Δ = 5.8, 2.3, 1.1 kb; gprF, WT = 4.0 kb; Δ = 2.9, 2.2 kb; gprG, WT = 10.3 kb; Δ = 9.0, 3.3, 2.3 kb; gprH, WT = 6.1 kb; Δ = 4.9, 1.9 kb; gprJ, WT = 7.4 kb; Δ = 5.2, 2.8 kb; gprK, WT = 7.1 kb; Δ =5.3, 2.2 kb; gprM, WT = 6.9 kb; Δ = 5.1, 2.2 kb; gprO, WT = 6.6 kb; Δ = 4.3, 3.3 kb; gprP, WT = 5.8 kb; Δ = 3.9, 2.4 kb; gprR, WT = 5.6 kb; Δ = 4.1, 2.4 kb; gprS, WT = 6.7 kb; Δ = 5.9, 1.8 kb; nopA, WT = 7.6 kb; Δ = 5.7, 2.9 kb. Download Figure S2, TIF file, 1.8 MB.
Copyright © 2014 Affeldt et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Figure S3
Impact of uridine and uracil on ΔgprR strain stress responses. (A) ΔgprR mutants in two different genetic backgrounds (CA14 and NRRL3357) were compared on neutral pH (pH 6.5) versus alkaline pH (pH 8) with and without supplementation of uridine and uracil (UU). After 3 days, radial growth was measured. (B) The same strains were also compared on glucose minimal medium (GMM) versus GMM amended with the cell wall stressor Congo red, both with and without UU. After 3 days, radial growth was measured. In both panels A and B, the percent growth inhibition caused by the stressor was calculated, and a two-tailed Student t test (P < 0.05) was carried out to assess differences between percent inhibition with and without UU supplementation. Differences that were not significant are denoted “n.s.,” and significant differences are marked with an asterisk (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). Download Figure S3, TIF file, 0.6 MB.
Copyright © 2014 Affeldt et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Figure S4
Impact of uridine and uracil on the stress responses of three independent ΔgprM transformants. (A) Three independent ΔgprM transformants in the CA14 background were compared to the wild type (WT) on neutral pH (pH 6.5) versus alkaline pH (pH 8) with and without supplementation of uridine and uracil (UU). After 3 days, radial growth was measured. (B) The same strains were also compared on glucose minimal medium (GMM) versus GMM amended with the cell wall stressor Congo red, both with and without UU. After 3 days, radial growth was measured. In both panels A and B, the percent growth inhibition caused by the stressor was calculated, and a two-tailed Student’s t test (P < 0.05) was carried out to assess differences between percent inhibition with and without UU supplementation. Differences that were not significant are denoted “n.s.,” and significant differences are marked with an asterisk (P < 0.05). Download Figure S4, TIF file, 0.6 MB.
Copyright © 2014 Affeldt et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Figure S5
Impact of uridine and uracil on the stress responses of mutants that do not exhibit a marker gene effect. (A) Independent ΔgprD and ΔgprH transformants in the CA14 background were compared to the wild type (WT) on neutral pH (pH 6.5) versus alkaline pH (pH 8) with and without supplementation of uridine and uracil (UU). After 3 days, radial growth was measured. (B) The same strains were also compared on glucose minimal medium (GMM) versus GMM amended with the cell wall stressor Congo red, both with and without UU. After 3 days, radial growth was measured. In both panels A and B, the percent growth inhibition caused by the stressor was calculated, and a two-tailed Student’s t test (P < 0.05) was carried out to assess differences between percent inhibition with and without UU supplementation. Differences that were not significant are denoted “n.s.,” and significant differences are marked with an asterisk (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). Download Figure S5, TIF file, 0.7 MB.
Copyright © 2014 Affeldt et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Table S1
Stress responses of multiple isolates of a subset of Δgpr mutants; strains were exposed to alkaline pH (pH 8) and cell wall stress (Congo red); percent inhibition of growth under stress versus growth on control medium (GMM) was measured; shaded boxes indicate data points in which the percent inhibition of the mutant differed significantly from that of the WT, as determined by a two-tailed Student’s t test (P < 0.05), and the degree of the difference is indicated by the different colors; darker red tones indicate mutants with greater sensitivity to the stressor, while darker blue tones denote the opposite. Table S1, TIF file, 0.3 MB.
Copyright © 2014 Affeldt et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Table S2
All strains used in this study and their genotypes Table S2, XLSX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2014 Affeldt et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Table S3
Oligonucleotide primers used for strain construction and confirmation Table S3, XLSX file, 0.04 MB.
Copyright © 2014 Affeldt et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Additional Files
Supplementary Data
Supplementary Data
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Figure sf1, TIF - Figure sf1, TIF
- Figure sf2, TIF - Figure sf2, TIF
- Figure sf3, TIF - Figure sf3, TIF
- Figure sf4, TIF - Figure sf4, TIF
- Figure sf5, TIF - Figure sf5, TIF
- Table st1, TIF - Table st1, TIF
- Table st2, XLSX - Table st2, XLSX
- Table st3, XLSX - Table st3, XLSX