Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Editor's Pick Research Article

Vaccine-Induced Measles Virus-Specific T Cells Do Not Prevent Infection or Disease but Facilitate Subsequent Clearance of Viral RNA

Wen-Hsuan W. Lin, Chien-Hsiung Pan, Robert J. Adams, Beth L. Laube, Diane E. Griffin
Rino Rappuoli, Editor
Wen-Hsuan W. Lin
aW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chien-Hsiung Pan
aW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert J. Adams
bDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth L. Laube
cDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diane E. Griffin
aW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rino Rappuoli
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01047-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1 

    MeV-specific T-cell responses after nebulized (Neb) and intramuscular (IM) immunization with LAV. T-cell responses were assessed by IFN-γ ELISpot assays. PBMCs were stimulated with overlapping peptides from the hemagglutinin (H) (A) or fusion (F) (B) proteins. Numbers of MeV-specific spot-forming cells (SFCs) were determined by averaging spots in duplicate peptide-stimulated wells and subtracting spots in unstimulated wells. Data are presented as average numbers of SFCs/106 PBMCs + the standard error of the mean (SEM) for each group (n = 3). No significant differences were detected (H-specific responses, 2 weeks, P = 0.13; 4 weeks, P = 0.35; Student’s t test).

  • FIG 2 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2 

    MeV-specific antibody responses after nebulized (Neb) and intramuscular (IM) immunization with LAV. Total MeV-specific IgG (A) and MeV H-, F-, and N-specific IgG (D to F) were determined by enzyme immunoassays using plates coated with lysates from MeV-infected Vero cells (A), MeV H-expressing L cells (D), MeV F-expressing L cells (E), or baculovirus-expressed MeV N (F). Values are plotted as means + SEM of optical density (OD). (B) Neutralizing antibody determined by plaque reduction neutralization test. The predicted protective level of antibody (120 mIU/ml) is indicated with a dashed line. Values are plotted as geometric means + SEM. (C) Avidity of MeV-specific IgG assessed by disruption of antibody binding with 0.5 to 3.0 M ammonium thiocyanate (NH4SCN). Values are plotted as means ± SEM of the avidity index, calculated as the concentration of NH4SCN at which 50% of the bound antibody was eluted. ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05 (Student’s t test).

  • FIG 3 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3 

    Viremia, blood leukocyte counts, antibody responses, and levels of viral RNA after wild-type MeV challenge. (A) Infectious virus in the blood quantified by cocultivation of PBMCs with B95-8 or Vero/hSLAM cells. Infectious MeV was not detected in i.m.-immunized (IM) animals but was cleared by 14 days in nebulizer-immunized (Neb) animals and by 17 days in naive macaques. TCID50, 50% tissue culture infectious dose. Differences between the naive and nebulizer-immunized groups were not significant. (B and C) Absolute numbers of circulating lymphocytes and monocytes. (D) MeV-specific IgM determined by enzyme immunoassay using plates coated with MeV-infected Vero cell lysate. IgM was detected in the nebulizer-immunized and naive animals but not in i.m.-immunized animals. (E) Neutralizing antibody determined by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). Values are plotted as geometric means + SEM. Titers were higher in nebulizer-immunized than naive and i.m.-immunized animals on day 14 (nebulizer immunized versus naive, P < 0.05; nebulizer immunized versus i.m. immunized, P < 0.01). Titers were higher in i.m.-immunized than in nebulizer-immunized and naive animals on days 0 and 7 (P < 0.001, two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest). (F) MeV RNA quantified by qRT-PCR on total RNA extracted from 2 × 106 PBMCs. RNA was amplified with MeV N-specific primers and measured with an N-specific probe. Results were normalized to GAPDH. No MeV RNA was detectable in i.m.-immunized macaques. MeV RNA was cleared by 24 days in nebulizer-immunized macaques and by 70 days in naive macaques. Values are shown as means + SEM.

  • FIG 4 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4 

    MeV-specific T-cell responses after challenge with wild-type MeV. Shown are T-cell responses 7 (A), 14 (B), and 35 (C) days after challenge as assessed by IFN-γ ELISpot. PBMCs were stimulated with overlapping peptides from the hemagglutinin (H), fusion (F), or nucleocapsid (N) proteins. Numbers of MeV protein-specific spot-forming cells (SFCs) were calculated by averaging duplicate wells and subtracting nonspecific responses. Nebulizer-immunized macaques had a more robust T-cell response than i.m.-immunized (IM) or naive macaques 14 and 35 days after infection (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison tests). ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05. (D) Correlation of the dynamics of the N-specific T-cell response and MeV RNA load. Shown is the group average of the number of N-specific SFCs (blue, orange, and green symbols) plotted against MeV N RNA load in PBMCs (gray symbols). Nebulizer-immunized animals showed a biphasic pattern of IFN-γ-producing T cells with a first peak at 14 days and a second peak at 35 days after challenge. The MeV RNA load and magnitude of T-cell responses showed an inverse relationship.

  • FIG 5 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5 

    Functionality of MeV-specific T cells after challenge of nebulizer-immunized and naive macaques with wild-type MeV analyzed by intracellular cytokine staining and multicolor flow cytometry. A total of 106 fresh PBMCs were stimulated with medium or pooled H (A and B) or N (C and D) peptides (1 µg/ml) in the presence of anti-CD107a antibody, brefeldin A, and Golgistop for 12 h. Cells expressing IFN-γ, TNF, IL-2, or CD107 were gated from CD3+ CD4+ cells and CD3+ CD8+ cells. Subsets of cells expressing each functional marker were analyzed by Boolean gating. Seven CD4+ subsets and 15 CD8+ subsets were identified. Subsets that express one (gray), two (yellow), three (orange), or four (red) different functional markers were grouped. The frequency of each subset within CD4+ or CD8+ T cells was calculated by subtracting nonspecific responses and averaging results from animals in the naive (A and C; orange) or nebulizer-immunized (B and D; blue) groups and shown in the bar chart. The functional composition of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses is shown in pie charts. More polyfunctional H- and N-specific CD4+ and N-specific CD8+ T cells were present in nebulizer-immunized than naive macaques.

  • FIG 6 
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6 

    Longitudinal analysis of the functionality of MeV-specific T cells in nebulizer-immunized macaques after infection. PBMCs from nebulizer-immunized animals collected at various times after wild-type MeV challenge were stimulated with medium or with pooled H or N peptides. Subsets that simultaneously express one (gray), two (yellow), three (orange), or four (red) different functional markers were grouped. Each pie chart shows the functional composition of the CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses at a given time point. Polyfunctional N-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and H-specific CD4+ T cells were stably maintained between 14 and 24 days postinfection (dpi) and then waned gradually, while polyfunctional H-specific CD8+ T cells waned more rapidly.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1 

    Detection of rash and MeV RNA in nasal swab samples

    Immunization groupMacaqueRashViral shedding on day:
    7101417/1823/2435
    Nebulizer1TNo−−+−−−
    18TYes−−+−−−
    22TYes−++++−
    i.m.38TNo−−−−−−
    47TNo−−−−−−
    67TNo−−−−−−
    Naive15UYes+++−−−
    46UYes−++−−−
    55UYes++++−−
    67UYes++++++
    40VYes++−−−NAa
    43VYes++++−NA
    • ↵a NA, not available.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure S1

    A no. 646 nebulizer with a Pulmo Aid compressor (DeVilbiss Health Care) and a standard mouthpiece were used to deliver a single-dose of the live attenuated Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine to macaques in the nebulizer-immunized group (1T, 18T, and 22T). Download Figure S1, EPS file, 2.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2014 Lin et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

  • Figure S2

    Flow cytometry analysis of T-cell function after wild-type MeV challenge. MeV-specific T cells were analyzed by intracellular cytokine staining and multicolor flow cytometry. A total of 106 fresh PBMCs were stimulated with medium alone, pooled H or N peptides (20-mers overlapping by 11 amino acids [1 µg/ml]) in the presence of anti-CD107a antibody, brefeldin A, and Golgistop for 12 h. After elimination of doublets and dead cells, cells expressing IFN-γ, TNF, IL-2, or CD107 were gated from CD3+ CD4+ cells and CD3+ CD8+ cells. Download Figure S2, EPS file, 2 MB.

    Copyright © 2014 Lin et al.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • Supplementary Data

    Supplementary Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Figure sf01, EPS - Figure sf01, EPS
    • Figure sf02, EPS - Figure sf02, EPS
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Vaccine-Induced Measles Virus-Specific T Cells Do Not Prevent Infection or Disease but Facilitate Subsequent Clearance of Viral RNA
Wen-Hsuan W. Lin, Chien-Hsiung Pan, Robert J. Adams, Beth L. Laube, Diane E. Griffin
mBio Apr 2014, 5 (2) e01047-14; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01047-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vaccine-Induced Measles Virus-Specific T Cells Do Not Prevent Infection or Disease but Facilitate Subsequent Clearance of Viral RNA
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Vaccine-Induced Measles Virus-Specific T Cells Do Not Prevent Infection or Disease but Facilitate Subsequent Clearance of Viral RNA
Wen-Hsuan W. Lin, Chien-Hsiung Pan, Robert J. Adams, Beth L. Laube, Diane E. Griffin
mBio Apr 2014, 5 (2) e01047-14; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01047-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511