Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article

Contrasting Life Strategies of Viruses that Infect Photo- and Heterotrophic Bacteria, as Revealed by Viral Tagging

Li Deng, Ann Gregory, Suzan Yilmaz, Bonnie T. Poulos, Philip Hugenholtz, Matthew B. Sullivan
Mary Ann Moran, Editor
Li Deng
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USAa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann Gregory
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USAa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzan Yilmaz
Microbial Ecology Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USAb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bonnie T. Poulos
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USAa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Hugenholtz
Microbial Ecology Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USAb
Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences & Institute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australiac
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew B. Sullivan
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USAa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Ann Moran
University of Georgia
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00373-12
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Contrasting Life Strategies of Viruses That Infect Photo- and Heterotrophic Bacteria, as Revealed by Viral Tagging - January 08, 2013

ABSTRACT

Ocean viruses are ubiquitous and abundant and play important roles in global biogeochemical cycles by means of their mortality, horizontal gene transfer, and manipulation of host metabolism. However, the obstacles involved in linking viruses to their hosts in a high-throughput manner bottlenecks our ability to understand virus-host interactions in complex communities. We have developed a method called viral tagging (VT), which combines mixtures of host cells and fluorescent viruses with flow cytometry. We investigated multiple viruses which infect each of two model marine bacteria that represent the slow-growing, photoautotrophic genus Synechococcus (Cyanobacteria) and the fast-growing, heterotrophic genus Pseudoalteromonas (Gammaproteobacteria). Overall, viral tagging results for viral infection were consistent with plaque and liquid infection assays for cyanobacterial myo-, podo- and siphoviruses and some (myo- and podoviruses) but not all (four siphoviruses) heterotrophic bacterial viruses. Virus-tagged Pseudoalteromonas organisms were proportional to the added viruses under varied infection conditions (virus-bacterium ratios), while no more than 50% of the Synechococcus organisms were virus tagged even at viral abundances that exceeded (5 to 10×) that of their hosts. Further, we found that host growth phase minimally impacts the fraction of virus-tagged Synechococcus organisms while greatly affecting phage adsorption to Pseudoalteromonas. Together these findings suggest that at least two contrasting viral life strategies exist in the oceans and that they likely reflect adaptation to their host microbes. Looking forward to the point at which the virus-tagging signature is well understood (e.g., for Synechococcus), application to natural communities should begin to provide population genomic data at the proper scale for predictively modeling two of the most abundant biological entities on Earth.

IMPORTANCE Viral study suffers from an inability to link viruses to hosts en masse, and yet delineating “who infects whom” is fundamental to viral ecology and predictive modeling. This article describes viral tagging—a high-throughput method to investigate virus-host interactions by combining the fluorescent labeling of viruses for “tagging” host cells that can be analyzed and sorted using flow cytometry. Two cultivated hosts (the cyanobacterium Synechococcus and the gammaproteobacterium Pseudoalteromonas) and their viruses (podo-, myo-, and siphoviruses) were investigated to validate the method. These lab-based experiments indicate that for most virus-host pairings, VT (viral tagging) adsorption is equivalent to traditional infection by liquid and plaque assays, with the exceptions being confined to promiscuous adsorption by Pseudoalteromonas siphoviruses. These experiments also reveal variability in life strategies across these oceanic virus-host systems with respect to infection conditions and host growth status, which highlights the need for further model system characterization to break open this virus-host interaction “black box.”

Introduction

The oceans cover more than 70% of the Earth’s surface and are dominated by complex and dynamic microbial communities, both in terms of biomass and metabolism (reviewed in reference 1). Phototrophic microorganisms harvest solar energy and produce the organic matter that fuels nearly all processes in the ocean (2, 3), while their heterotrophic counterparts respire this fixed organic carbon. While global carbon cycling is fundamental to predictive modeling of climate change and represents one of the best-studied elemental cycling processes on Earth, our understanding of the balance between fixed and respired carbon on a global scale remains poorly understood (reviewed in reference 4).

With respect to carbon cycling, viruses have largely been ignored due to lack of data. This is in spite of the fact that, at least in the oceans, viruses are abundant (~106 to 108 ml−1 water), kill ~20 to 40% of bacteria per day, and are responsible for large carbon fluxes in the oceans at 150 Gt year−1 (5). However, their carbon cycling impact is likely much larger. For example, cyanobacterial viruses (cyanophages) also contain photosynthesis genes, including the core photosystem gene psbA and sometimes psbD (6–10), as well as other auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs [11]; e.g., pebS and talC) that are expressed during infection (12–15) and are likely critical to ocean cyanophage infection. In fact, psbA is modeled to increase phage fitness (16, 17), and in ocean surface microbial metagenomes, viral versions, rather than microbial versions, dominate the psbA signal—at least where organismal origin can be informatically identified (8). Thus, while no quantitative community proteomic data are yet available, ocean photosynthetic carbon fixation is at least partly mediated by virus-encoded core photosynthesis proteins, thereby furthering the viral impact on global biogeochemistry.

As ocean ecology attempts to advance from observations to predictions, modeling becomes of fundamental importance. While two decades of viral ecology research has focused on community level understanding through measuring viral abundance, production/decay, and frequency of infected cells (for example, see references 18 to 24), little is known about the fundamental issue of “who infects whom.”

While cultivation-based methods directly link a virus strain to its host, it is impossible to characterize millions of viruses per milliliter of seawater and thousands to hundreds of thousands of viral types per sampling site (25) using traditional low-throughput cultivation methods. Fortunately, new methods are on the way. First, microfluidic digital PCR now allows a researcher to document colocalized host and viral gene products, as long as genetic information is available for primer design for both virus and host (26). Second, Escherichia coli O157-specific immunomagnetic beads coated with fluorescently labeled viruses use the virus-host interaction to fluorescently label E. coli for detection using flow cytometry (27, 28), but this method currently requires high cell concentrations (104 cells ml−1) for detection and the availability of immunomagnetic beads specific to individual host strains (27, 28). Third, fluorescently labeled viruses (FLVs) have been used as probes to tag their host cells for examination under the microscope (29–31), a method that is limited only by the fact that it is low throughput. Additionally, while FLVs and flow cytometry have been combined to increase throughput (32), labeling of nonhost cells has plagued these experiments even when a thymidine analog (EdU [5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine]) was used as an alternative virus-labeling agent (32).

Here we expand upon the above-described use of FLVs to tag host cells by (i) optimizing staining, (ii) incorporating flow cytometry to enable high-throughput detection of infected host cells (and sequencing in future work), and (iii) validating the methods by comparison against infection assays via controlled laboratory experiments. We then applied the optimized viral tagging (VT) method to two marine model virus-host systems—the slow-growing (doubling time ~ 24 h), photoautotrophic cyanobacterium Synechococcus and the fast-growing (doubling time ~ 1 h), heterotrophic alphaproteobacterium Pseudoalteromonas and their specific viruses—to investigate how they are affected by various infection and growth conditions. These two model systems make ideal candidates for this study, as they are widespread and ecologically important in the oceans (for example, see references 5, 19, and 33 to 37).

RESULTS

The objective of this study was to couple the use of FLVs for tagging their host cells (29–31) with high-throughput flow cytometry for rapid, culture-independent assessment of host-virus pairings initially in controlled, laboratory studies (this study) for eventual application in natural complex communities (future work). Here we developed and tested VT on multiple viral isolates from each of two well-studied marine virus-host model systems.

Optimizing the viral tagging method.To develop a robust method, we first optimized all three steps of the VT process: (i) viral staining, (ii) viral washing, and (iii) examining the mixture of bacteria and viruses using flow cytometry.

To optimize viral staining, we evaluated three stains (SYBR gold, SYBR green II, and SYBR Safe) and three previously described incubation conditions (80°C for 10 min, room temperature for 10 min, and 4°C overnight [38]) using the cyanophage Syn33 and the host strain Synechococcus WH7803 (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). SYBR gold at 80°C for 10 min (38) demonstrated the highest fluorescence intensity and least background noise (data not shown); thus, these conditions were chosen as the standard for the rest of the study. As in a previous study (32), we found that the SYBR gold-labeled cyanophages produced a number of plaques on host lawn agarose plates equivalent to that obtained with unlabeled phage (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material).

Figure S1

Schematic overview of VT staining optimizations: three dyes (SYBR gold, SYBR green II, and SYBR Safe) were compared under various incubation conditions (80°C for 10 min, room temperature for 10 min, and 4°C for overnight) to identify the optimal VT conditions. All experiments were conducted with the cyanomyovirus Syn33 and the host strain Synechococcus WH7803. Download Figure S1, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2012 Deng et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Figure S2

PFU of SYBR gold-labeled (80°C, 10 min) viruses and unlabeled ones on their host lawns. Each test was done in triplicate (error bars show standard deviations). Download Figure S2, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2012 Deng et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

We next optimized washing conditions to remove unincorporated dye molecules in the viral suspension that might stain host cellular DNA and result in an upward green fluorescence shift in the absence of viruses or viral tagging. Initially, recovery of viral particles after washing was <20% efficient when it was carried out with a commonly used 100-kDa ultrafiltration device, but lower-cutoff devices (10 kDa) increased recovery rates to 29% ± 2% (n = 15; see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Two treatments improved recovery further (details are presented in Materials and Methods). Briefly, pretreating the ultracentrifugal devices with bovine serum albumin (BSA) increased viral recovery >2-fold (see Fig. S3), while posttreating the ultrafiltration devices with sonication to remove adhering viral particles increased viral recovery ~3-fold (see Fig. S3). The final, optimized washing protocol recovered 89% ± 5% (n = 15) of viral particles per wash and required stained viruses to be washed six times with Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer to ensure adequate removal of residual SYBR.

Figure S3

Recovery rate of viruses (cyanomyoviruses Syn33 and S-SM1; Pseudoalteromonas viruses myovirus PSA-HM3, podovirus PSA-HP1, and siphovirus PSA-HS4) using ultracentrifugal devices (Nanosep with low-protein-binding membranes; Pall, New York, NY) with a 10,000 or 100,000 molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) under various conditions. Treatments include pretreatment with bovine serum albumin (BSA) and posttreatment by sonication (for details, see Materials and Methods). Each test was done in triplicate (error bars show standard deviations). Download Figure S3, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2012 Deng et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Given these staining and washing optimizations, we next mixed the FLVs with host cells (29, 27, 30, 31) and screened them with flow cytometry (Fig. 1A and B). Single-cell observations of a single virus-host pair (cyanophage Syn33 and Synechococcus WH7803) using an Amnis ImageStreamX imaging flow cytometer confirmed that FLVs had labeled only the population of cells with increased green fluorescence. These data from >105 cells showed that green-shifted, virus-tagged cells contained autofluorescent cyanobacterial chlorophyll (red) and DNA-stained virus (green pinpoints), while green-negative cells contained only chlorophyll (red; Fig. 1C). Further, a known host (Synechococcus WH7803) was mixed with fluorescently labeled viruses (Syn33) and nonhost cells (Synechococcus WH8020) at equivalent concentrations (WH7803-Syn33-WH8020 = 1:1:1), or the host cells were flooded with viruses or nonhost cells at a 100-fold-higher density (WH7803-Syn33-WH8020 = 1:100:100). Virus-tagged and nontagged cells were sorted separately using flow cytometry and subjected to viral and bacterial DNA extraction. PCR (40 cycles) targeting rpoC1 genes in bacteria WH7803 and WH8020, and the portal protein gene in virus Syn33 was used to assay specificity of the virus-tagged and nontagged cells. Our results demonstrated that VT is specific and sensitive, as the virus-tagged population was composed exclusively of the known host cells, as determined by PCR, even when the known host was greatly outnumbered by virions (Fig. 1D).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Overview and initial data for viral tagging (VT). (A) Viruses are fluorescently labeled green and then mixed with potential host bacteria which are flow-cytometrically green negative and incubated until the cells are tagged by fluorescently labeled viruses. (B) Flow cytometry data triggered on forward scatter for the fluorescently labeled virus Syn33 (107 ml−1) and axenic Synechococcus WH7803 (106 ml−1) coincubated for 20 min at a VBR of 1. (C) Representative micrographs of virus-tagged (green-positive) and nontagged (green-negative) cells examined by an Amnis ImageStreamX scanning flow cytometer to show colocalization of the green VT signal to the red-autofluorescing cyanobacterial cells. Notably, >105 cells for each green-positive and green-negative population were examined in a 10-min experiment. (D) Discrimination by PCR (40 cycles) of the host strain Synechococcus WH7803 from the mixture of WH7803, the virus Syn33 and nonhost WH 8020 in the virus-tagged population (red) and a nontagged population (black). The first experiment used strains in equal concentrations (WH7803-Syn33-WH8020 = 1:1:1, 105 cells ml−1; lanes 1 and 3), while the second kept the host at 105 cells ml−1 but employed viruses or nonhost cells at a 100-fold-higher density (WH7803-Syn33-WH8020 = 1:100:100; lanes 2 and 4).

Viral adsorption and infection.Given an optimized VT method, we next sought to document whether a positive VT signal from diverse virus-host systems correlated with the results two existing gold standard infection assays (plaque and liquid infection assays). Five lytic cyanophages (two myo-, two podo-, and one siphoviruses) and six heterophages (viruses that infect heterotrophic Pseudoalteromonas bacteria; one lytic myovirus, one lytic podovirus, and four siphoviruses) were challenged with 12 cyanobacterial and 12 Pseudoalteromonas strains in VT, plaque infection, and liquid infection assays (Fig.  2). For the 264 possible bacterium-virus pairings (24 bacteria × 11 viruses), VT adsorption results matched infection results from plaque and liquid infection assays with the exception of bacterial pairings involving all four Pseudoalteromonas siphoviruses tested. Thus, when the VT signal was positive, so were the infection results, and vice versa, which suggests that for the bulk of the phage-host pairs under the conditions tested, adsorption equals infection. Infection assays indicated that the four exceptional Pseudoalteromonas siphoviruses four siphoviruses infected their specific known host strains, but their VT signals indicated that adsorption was more promiscuous and included both recognized and unrecognized host strains of Pseudoalteromonas. Monitoring adsorption kinetics with one of these Pseudoalteromonas siphoviruses on multiple host strains showed that it adsorbed to both host and nonhost strains (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material), consistent with the VT signals observed.

Figure S4

Adsorption kinetic experiments of Pseudoalteromonas siphovirus PSA-HS6 against four Pseudoalteromonas strains revealed that this siphovirus adsorbs to all four strains. As inferred from traditional plaque and liquid infection assays, this siphovirus infects two of these cell strains (host; solid lines), 11-68 and 13-15, but not the other two (nonhost; dashed lines), 10-33 and H106. Each test was done in duplicate (error bars show standard deviations) using a ratio of 1 virus per 10 bacteria at cell concentrations of 106 cells ml−1. Download Figure S4, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2012 Deng et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Host ranges of five cyanobacterial viruses (two myo-, two podo-, and one siphoviruses) and six Pseudoalteromonas viruses (one myo-, one podo-, and four siphoviruses) estimated using three methods: VT, liquid infection (L), and plaque assay (P). Each test was done in triplicate using a ratio of 10 viruses per bacterium at cell concentrations of 105 cells ml−1.

Infection conditions and host cell physiology.We next explored how five hosts and their specific viruses responded to infection conditions that included various virus-to-bacterium ratios (VBR) and host growth phases. All host cells were acclimatized through three inoculations and showed reproducible growth curves before use in the physiology experiments (Fig. 3A).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Percentage of tagged bacteria quantified using VT. Slow-growing photoautotrophic Synechococcus strains (WH7803 and WH6501) and fast-growing heterotrophic Pseudoalteromonas strains (H100, H71, and H105) were acclimatized through three inoculations (A; note that some cultivation times are in hours and some are in days). These strains were infected by their specific viruses under different infection conditions (B; VBR = 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, or 10) or host growth physiologies (C; logarithmic-, late-logarithmic-, and stationary-phase samples were taken for all three; phases are indicated in the growth curves in panel A; the VBR was 10 for Synechococcus-virus pairs and 1 for Pseudoalteromonas-virus pairs). In experiment B, percentages of tagged cells were documented at the time point after FLVs were inoculated for 20 min at various VBR, while in experiment C, percentages of tagged cells were documented along the inoculation time of FLVs. Each test was done in triplicate (error bars show standard deviations) at cell concentrations of 106 cells ml−1 and various VBR and a virus-host mixture time of 20 min in the first experiment but at a VBR of 1 or 10 in the host growth physiology experiments.

For the first set of experiments, a constant concentration (~106 cells ml−1) of late-logarithmic-growth-phase cells was mixed with various fold numbers of their specific viruses (VBRs = 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, and 10) (Fig. 3B). We found that viruses adsorbed to heterotrophic Pseudoalteromonas cells and cyanobacterial cells differently. Pseudoalteromonas viruses adsorbed nearly proportionally to the amount added, until the cells were 100% virus tagged (VBRs > 2) after only 20 min of mixing. In contrast, the cyanophages never tagged more than ~40 to 50% of their host cells even at high VBRs (up to 10) and lengthened adsorption times (up to 60 and 120 min) (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material).

Figure S5

Percentage of Synechococcus WH7803 cells tagged by phage Syn33 using VT at a VBR of 10 at 0, 30, 60, and 120 min after mixture of bacteria and viruses. Each test was done in triplicate (error bars show standard deviations) at concentrations of 106 cells ml−1. Download Figure S5, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2012 Deng et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

In the second set of experiments, cells from three physiological growth phases (early log, late log, and stationary) were challenged with their specific viruses using a constant cell concentration of ~106 ml−1 and VBRs of 1 and 10 for Pseudoalteromonas-virus pairs and Synechococcus-virus pairs, respectively (Fig. 3C). Again, we found contrasting results between these two virus-host systems; host cell growth phase was relatively constant in cyanobacterium-virus pairs but not in Pseudoalteromonas-virus pairs, where the percentage of tagged cells was lower in both early log and stationary phases than in the late log phase.

DISCUSSION

Here we built on previous studies that specifically label bacterial host cells (including Cyanobacteria and E. coli in complex microbial communities using FLVs [30, 31, 39]) by coupling flow cytometry analyses to FLV washing conditions, which enabled specific, high-throughput linkage between viruses and the microbes to which they adsorb.

For ocean viruses, does adsorption equal infection?For most of the viruses tested (all cyanophages and myo- and podovirus heterophages), VT signals were equivalent to infection assay results, suggesting that adsorption of these ocean viruses might always lead to infection. However, for all four heterosiphoviruses this was not the case. We envision two possible mechanistic explanations for this. First, these viruses may adsorb more promiscuously to nonhost cells. There is, however, some specificity to these interactions, as heterosiphoviruses bound only to Pseudoalteromonas strains, not to cyanobacteria (Fig. 2). Some viruses bind irreversibly to a single receptor (e.g., podovirus N4 to NfrA [40]), while other viruses reversibly bind primary receptors that then trigger structural rearrangements of the virus to irreversibly bind a second receptor (e.g., myovirus T4 [41]). Perhaps the Pseudoalteromonas siphovirus-positive VT signals capture the reversible adsorption step. Alternatively, adsorption may be specific but not result in lytic infection under our plaque or liquid infection assay conditions. Given that siphoviruses are commonly temperate (i.e., capable of entering the lysogenic or prophage state), though at least one of these lacks a readily identifiable integrase gene (PSA-HS4 [42]), they may form nonlytic infections with some or all of the hosts to which they adsorb. While prophage states present a complex VT signal, such cryptic temperate phage infections remain one of the most challenging aspects of phage biology to study in spite of their documented importance in the wild (e.g., 40 to 60% of marine bacteria contain inducible prophage [43]). If follow-up work demonstrates that these siphoviruses indeed form lysogenic infections, we posit that VT coupled to traditional growth assays may aid in highlighting potential lysogenic infections that are undetectable by conventional infection assays. If such studies suggest the opposite, then one must cautiously interpret the relationship of adsorption and infection for these more challenging virus-host groups.

Impact of infection conditions on viral tagging.Modeling suggests that fast-growing bacteria may exist in low abundances in the wild due to intensified viral predation (e.g., 44). Indeed, both mesocosm experiments and observations of ocean viral abundances support these results. In mesocosms, reduced viral abundance correlates with rare bacterial lineages becoming dominant (45), while broad ocean surveys show that viral abundances are commonly negatively correlated with (presumably fast-growing) heterotrophic bacteria and positively correlated with slow-growing cyanobacteria (for example, see references 19, 22, 23, and 46 to 48).

Mechanistically, one could imagine fast growers outcompeting co-occurring microbes for nutrients using a high-affinity nutrient transporter that doubles as a viral receptor. Indeed, marine microbial genomes and metagenomes suggest increased transporter diversity among fast-growing relative to slower-growing bacteria (34, 49–51), and new naming conventions have been proposed, such as “opportunitroph” and “passive oligotroph” (51) and “oligotroph” and “copiotroph” (50). Relevant to the host strains examined here, 18 marine cyanobacterial strains (7 Synechococcus and 11 Prochlorococcus) and the only Pseudoalteromonas strain (Pseudoalteromonas atlantica T6c) analyzed in this way are defined as oligotrophs and copiotrophs, respectively (50). In the viral literature (for example, see the review in reference 36), it is posited that such fast-growing microbes are r-selected species (52), with high metabolic rates and rapid response times but low natural abundances due to increased top-down pressures from grazers and viruses. In contrast, slower-growing, K-selected passive oligotrophs are thought to be more resistant to viral and grazing predation, which was empirically measured for cyanobacteria and their viruses decades ago (48). While they are based upon limited data, and clearly not the focus of this study, our observations here that all Pseudoalteromonas cells and only a portion of cyanobacterial cells could be virus tagged are consistent with copiotrophs’ susceptibility and oligotrophs’ resistance to their co-occurring viruses.

Impact of host cell physiology on viral tagging.Our observation that the number of Pseudoalteromonas-virus pairs, assessed as the percentage of tagged cells, is lower in both early log and stationary phases than late log phase is consistent with previous research with other heterotrophic virus-host systems (53). In these systems (E. coli and Pseudomonas), increases in viral adsorption with host growth rate is thought to be due to a change in the abundance and structure of the cell surface receptor sites. Perhaps similar mechanisms underpin our observations.

In contrast, host growth phase did not impact the cyanobacterium-virus interaction in one of the virus-host systems studied and only minimally impacted it in the other. Two surveys of wild populations in marine systems reported constant viral adsorption rates irrespective of the physiological status of cells (30, 33), which was later interpreted as a “bet-hedging strategy” (54). Such bet-hedging implies that some viruses may attach to host cells regardless of the host’s physiological state, to maximize the probability of the viral population’s producing progeny under starved or challenging conditions when few host cells are proximal. If such a bet-hedging strategy exists and implicates genetic variation in the pool of viral progeny, then perhaps that may explain why not all cyanobacterial cells could be virus tagged. In the oceans, where cyanobacterial cells are abundant, the fraction that are hosts for any particular virus is likely to be very low, with contact rate estimates, guided by likely imperfect culture-dependent strain-specific cyanophage titers, suggesting that every virus-host contact leads to infection (5, 47, 48, 55). Perhaps the overall cyanophage population engages in bet hedging, given the relatively low abundances of cyanobacteria that serve as host cells in open ocean environments.

Alternatively, two methodological issues may have resulted in the observed patterns among cyanobacterial virus-host systems. First, we may have failed to accurately recognize the later stages of cyanobacterial host cell growth. We used fluorescence as a proxy for cyanobacterial biomass, which is susceptible to changes in chlorophyll per cell over different growth phases in batch culture (56). While subsequent comparison of fluorescence-based and cell count-based growth curves suggests that we did not assay stationary-phase cells in our VT experiments (see Fig. S6 in the supplemental material), it remains a robust and intriguing observation that one virus-host pairing showed that early-log-phase cells are virus tagged differently than late-log-phase cells, while the other did not (Fig. 3C). Second, our studies were conducted with host cells grown under continuous light, as opposed to natural, diurnal varying light levels or even on-off light-dark cycles. Light quality impacts adsorption of myovirus S-PM2 to Synechococcus WH7803 (57), and photosynthesis is commonly required for productive cyanophage infections (58, 59). While we achieved consistent growth rates for the cyanobacteria in this study (Fig. 3A), the conditions were not optimized for maximal cell growth or photosynthesis. Future work focusing on evaluating the VT signal in cyanobacterium-virus model systems with axenic cells grown under a light-dark cycle should help differentiate biology from artifact.

Figure S6

Comparison of fluorescence-based and flow cytometry (FCM) cell count-based growth curves of photoautotrophic Synechococcus strain WH7803. Download Figure S6, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2012 Deng et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Implications for marine viral ecology.Contrasting trophic strategies (r- and K-selected copiotrophs and oligotrophs) among marine bacteria are now suggested by genomic and metagenomic analyses (3, 36, 50, 51, 60). Our data suggest similarly divergent strategies for their viruses that may reflect adaptation to the fundamentally opposing ecological lifestyles of their hosts. Clearly, future work with other model systems will determine whether such inferences about viral life strategies can be generalized. Further, interactions between cyanobacteria and their cocultured heterotrophs were recently highlighted as being critical to cyanobacterial growth (61–63), likely by heterotrophs protecting cyanobacteria from photosynthesis-generated oxygen radicals (61), an evolutionary scenario described as the “Black Queen hypothesis” (64). How viruses play into such coculture experiments would add a new layer to this emerging research trajectory, and VT provides a method that would be invaluable for high-throughput study of these interactions.

The viral ecologist’s toolkit is stronger than ever. For example, the process from source waters to viral metagenome is more robust, as new concentration methods capture nearly all SYBR-stainable particles (65), as well as providing solutions for the limiting DNA problem (66) and empirical data for making decisions about replication and commonly used concentration and purification methods (67). Looking forward, we now envision that VT in combination with other emerging experimental tools in viral ecology—e.g., single viral genomics (68), phageFISH (E. Allers, C. Moraru, M. Duhaime, E. Beneze, N. Solonenko, J. B. Canosa, R. Amann, and M. B. Sullivan, submitted for publication), and microfluidic digital PCR (26)—will prove transformative for the field. These emerging methods, and undoubtedly others, along with parallel innovative informatic solutions should lead to powerful and complementary new windows into viral biology and unprecedented insights into the population structure of viruses in nature, including directly linking viruses to their hosts en masse. We can finally begin to determine “who infects whom” on a scale that allows the development of predictive models of the foundational biological entities (microbes and viruses) in ocean and earth systems. In clinical settings, quantifying viral diversity linked to a particular host is critical for understanding disease progression (69), designing vaccines (70), and developing antiviral drug therapy (71), and VT offers potential contributions to these clinical endeavors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Culturing conditions.Bacteria and viruses used in this study are listed in Table 1. For details on the culture conditions used, see Text S1 in the supplemental material.

Text S1

Supplemental materials and methods. Download Text S1, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.
Copyright © 2012 Deng et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1 

Summary information about the cyanobacterial and Pseudoalteromonas strains and the viruses used in this study

Phage enumeration.Viral particles were enumerated as previously described (72). In all samples, at least 500 viral or bacterial particles were counted to get accurate numbers for estimating VBR.

Host range experiments.Phage isolates were screened (in triplicate) for their ability to grow on 12 cyanobacterial and 12 Pseudoalteromonas hosts using three different methods. First, liquid infection host range analyses were performed in a volume of 300 μl (VBR = 10; concentrations determined by SYBR gold) in 96-well microtiter plates and analyzed using an Appliskan plate reader as described in the “Culturing conditions” section in Text S1 in the supplemental material. Second, plaque assays at a VBR of 10 were used to confirm the observed host range under liquid infection experimental conditions. Host cell suspensions immobilized in agarose (for Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus hosts) or agar (for Pseudoalteromonas) were incubated under host growth conditions either overnight (Pseudoalteromonas) or 3 weeks (Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus). Third, the VT assay was conducted with each phage-host pair as described below but at a VBR of 10 and bacterial concentrations of 106 ml−1.

Adsorption kinetics experiments.Viruses were mixed with bacteria in late logarithmic phase at concentrations of ~108 cells ml−1 and a VBR of 0.1 to optimize adsorption of all viruses. Subsamples were taken at 0, 5, 10, and 30 min after virus addition and immediately filtered (0.2 μm) to remove bacteria, and the filtrate was used in plaque assays to determine the number of free viruses in the medium at each time point. The percentage of free viruses was calculated from the decline in free viruses at each time point relative to the number at time zero.

VT experimental details.Viral lysates were purified using a cesium chloride step gradient (2 ml of 1.65 g ml−1, 3 ml of 1.4 g ml−1, 3 ml of 1.3 g ml−1, and 1 ml of 1.2 g ml−1 in 0.02-μm-filtered and autoclaved SNAX medium). Gradients were ultracentrifuged in a Beckman LM-80M with an SW28 rotor at 24,000 rpm for 4 h at 4°C. The resulting purified virus fraction was dialyzed into modified TM storage buffer (600 mM NaCl, 100 mM MgCl2, 100 mM Tris-HCl; pH 7.5). Purified, dialyzed viral samples were used for optimizing staining and washing procedures, and all stains, reagents, and buffers were filter sterilized using 0.02-μm-pore-size Anotop disposable syringe filters (catalog no. 09-926; Whatman Inc.).

See Results for a description of the optimization of the VT stain and washing conditions. To maximize viral recovery from washing steps, two treatments were required: (i) pretreating ultracentrifugal devices (10-kDa cutoff; Nanosep, catalog no. 29300-608; Pall, New York, NY) with 0.5 ml of 0.2-μm-filter-sterilized 1% BSA (catalog no. E531-1.5ML; Bioexpress, Kaysville, UT) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) incubated for 1 h at room temperature; and (ii) posttreating the ultrafiltration devices by adding back 50 μl TE buffer and sonicating (VWR Signature ultrasonic cleaner; B1500A-DTH) for 3 min using settings of 50 W at 42 kHz.

Stained and washed viruses were mixed with bacteria at the concentrations and ratios desired for flow cytometer analysis as the second component of the VT assay. All VT experiments were done with a negative control, which was prepared identically to the stained and washed virus samples except without viruses; this controlled for the appearance of cells that were false-positive for virus tagging as a result of free dye.

Flow cytometer analyses.Bacterial and viral samples were examined using an iCyt Reflection flow cytometer equipped with a 200-mW 488-nm air-cooled solid-state laser. Fluorescence was detected using a 520/40 band pass filter with an amplified photomultiplier tube. Events were detected using a forward scatter trigger, and data were collected in logarithmic mode and then analyzed with WinList 6.0 software (Verity Software House). Fluorescent polystyrene Flow Check microspheres (1 µm yellow-green beads; catalog no. 23517-10; Polysciences Inc., Warrington, PA) were used as an internal standard.

In separate experiments, single cells were imaged and documented using an ImageStreamX imaging flow cytometer with two lasers (488 nm and 10 mW; 785 nm and 5 mW; Amnis Corporation). Images were collected and analyzed using IDEAS 4.0 software (Amnis Corporation).

PCR screening to evaluate specificity of VT.For a description of the PCR screening, see the supplemental material.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Biosphere 2, BIO5, NSF OCE0940390, and a Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation grant to M.B.S. The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute was supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

We thank J. B. Waterbury and A. Wichels for Synechococcus and Pseudoalteromonas strains, respectively; Tucson Marine Phage Lab members for discussions and comments on the manuscript; and B. Nankivell for help with figures. We acknowledge Brian Hall and Amnis Corporation for data generation and iCyt and AZCC/ARL-Division of Biotechnology Cytometry Core Facility for cytometry support (Cancer Center Support Grant CCSG–CA 023074).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 18 September 2012
    • Accepted 8 October 2012
    • Published 30 October 2012
  • Copyright © 2012 Deng et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    1. DeLong EF
    . 2007. Modern microbial seascapes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5:755–757.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Giovannoni SJ,
    2. Stingl U
    . 2005. Molecular diversity and ecology of microbial plankton. Nature 437:343–348.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Karl DM
    . 2007. Microbial oceanography: paradigms, processes and promise. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5:759–769.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.
    1. Moran MA,
    2. Miller WL
    . 2007. Resourceful heterotrophs make the most of light in the coastal ocean. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5:792–800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Suttle CA
    . 2005. Viruses in the sea. Nature 437:356–361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lindell D,
    2. et al
    . 2004. Transfer of photosynthesis genes to and from Prochlorococcus viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:11013–11018.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mann NH,
    2. Cook A,
    3. Millard A,
    4. Bailey S,
    5. Clokie M
    . 2003. Bacterial photosynthesis genes in a virus. Nature 424:741.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sharon I,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Viral photosynthetic reaction center genes and transcripts in the marine environment. ISME J. 1:492–501.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Sullivan MB,
    2. Coleman ML,
    3. Weigele P,
    4. Rohwer F,
    5. Chisholm SW
    . 2005. Three Prochlorococcus cyanophage genomes: signature features and ecological interpretations. PLoS Biol. 3:e144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sullivan MB,
    2. et al
    . 2006. Prevalence and evolution of core photosystem II genes in marine cyanobacterial viruses and their hosts. PLoS Biol. 4:e234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Breitbart M,
    2. Thompson LR,
    3. Suttle CS,
    4. Sullivan MB
    . 2007. Exploring the vast diversity of marine viruses. J. Oceanogr. 20:353–362.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Clokie MR,
    2. et al
    . 2006. Transcription of a “photosynthetic” T4-type phage during infection of a marine cyanobacterium. Environ. Microbiol. 8:827–835.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Dammeyer T,
    2. Bagby SC,
    3. Sullivan MB,
    4. Chisholm SW,
    5. Frankenberg-Dinkel N
    . 2008. Efficient phage-mediated pigment biosynthesis in oceanic cyanobacteria. Curr. Biol. 18:442–448.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Lindell D,
    2. Jaffe JD,
    3. Johnson ZI,
    4. Church GM,
    5. Chisholm SW
    . 2005. Photosynthesis genes in marine viruses yield proteins during host infection. Nature 438:86–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wilhelm SW,
    2. Suttle CA
    . 1999. Viruses and nutrient cycles in the sea. BioScience 49:781–788.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Bragg JG,
    2. Chisholm SW
    . 2008. Modeling the fitness consequences of a cyanophage-encoded photosynthesis gene. PLoS One 3:e3550.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hellweger FL
    . 2009. Carrying photosynthesis genes increases ecological fitness of cyanophage in silico. Environ. Microbiol. 11:1386–1394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bergh O,
    2. Børsheim KY,
    3. Bratbak O,
    4. Heldal M
    . 1989. High abundance of viruses found in aquatic environments. Nature 340:467–468.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Parsons RJ,
    2. Breitbart M,
    3. Lomas MW,
    4. Carlson CA
    . 2012. Ocean time-series reveals recurring seasonal patterns of virioplankton dynamics in the northwestern Sargasso sea. ISME J. 6:273–284.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.
    1. Proctor LM,
    2. Fuhrman JA
    . 1990. Viral mortality of marine bacteria and cyanobacteria. Nature 343:60–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. 21.
    1. Rohwer F,
    2. Thurber RV
    . 2009. Viruses manipulate the marine environment. Nature 459:207–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Suttle CA,
    2. Chen F
    . 1992. Mechanisms and rates of decay of marine viruses in seawater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:3721–3729.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Suttle CA
    . 1994. The significance of viruses to mortality in aquatic microbial communities. Microb. Ecol. 28:237–243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Wommack KE,
    2. Colwell RR
    . 2000. Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64:69–114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Angly FE,
    2. et al
    . 2006. The marine viromes of four oceanic regions. PLoS Biol. 4:e368.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Tadmor AD,
    2. Ottesen EA,
    3. Leadbetter JR,
    4. Phillips R
    . 2011. Probing individual environmental Bacteria for viruses by using microfluidic digital PCR. Science 333:58–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Goodridge L,
    2. Chen JR,
    3. Griffiths M
    . 1999. Development and characterization of a fluorescent-bacteriophage assay for detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1397–1404.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Goodridge L,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Griffiths M
    . 1999. The use of a fluorescent bacteriophage assay for detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in inoculated ground beef and raw milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 47:43–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Comeau AM,
    2. Noble RT
    . 2010. Preparation and application of fluorescently labeled virus particles, p 19–29. In Wilhelm SW, Weinbauer MG, Suttle CA , Manual of aquatic Viral ecology. American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Waco, TX.
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hennes KP,
    2. Suttle CA,
    3. Chan AM
    . 1995. Fluorescently labeled virus probes show that natural virus populations can control the structure of marine microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3623–3627.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Mosier-Boss PA,
    2. et al
    . 2003. Use of fluorescently labeled phage in the detection and identification of bacterial species. Appl. Spectrosc. 57:1138–1144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Ohno S,
    2. et al
    . 2012. A method for evaluating the host range of bacteriophages using phages fluorescently labeled with 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 95:777–788.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Brussaard CP,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Global-scale processes with a nanoscale drive: the role of marine viruses. ISME J. 2:575–578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Fuhrman JA
    . 1999. Marine viruses and their biogeochemical and ecological effects. Nature 399:541–548.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Holmström C,
    2. Kjelleberg S
    . 1999. Marine Pseudoalteromonas species are associated with higher organisms and produce biologically active extracellular agents. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 30:285–293.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Suttle CA
    . 2007. Marine viruses—major players in the global ecosystem. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5:801–812.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Wichels A,
    2. Gerdts G,
    3. Schutt C
    . 2002. Pseudoalteromonas spp. Phages, a significant group of marine bacteriophages in the North Sea. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 27:233–239.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Brussaard CPD
    2004. Optimization of procedures for counting viruses by flow cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1506–1513.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Kenzaka T,
    2. Tani K,
    3. Nasu M
    . 2010. High-frequency phage-mediated gene transfer in freshwater environments determined at single-cell level. ISME J. 4:648–659.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Monier A,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Horizontal gene transfer of an entire metabolic pathway between a eukaryotic alga and its DNA virus. Genome Res. 19:1441–1449.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Miller ES,
    2. et al
    . 2003. Bacteriophage T4 genome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67:86–156.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Duhaime MB,
    2. Wichels A,
    3. Waldmann J,
    4. Teeling H,
    5. Glockner FO
    . 2011. Ecogenomics and genome landscapes of marine Pseudoalteromonas phage H1056/1. ISME J. 5:107–121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Paul JH
    . 2008. Prophages in marine bacteria: dangerous molecular time bombs or the key to survival in the seas? ISME J. 2:579–589.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Thingstad TF
    . 2000. Elements of a theory for the mechanisms controlling abundance, diversity, and biogeochemical role of lytic bacterial viruses in aquatic ecosystems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45:1320–1328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Bouvier T,
    2. del Giorgio PA
    . 2007. Key role of selective viral-induced mortality in determining marine bacterial community composition. Environ. Microbiol. 9:287–297.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Morris RM,
    2. et al
    . 2002. SAR11 clade dominates ocean surface bacterioplankton communities. Nature 420:806–810.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Sullivan MB,
    2. Waterbury JB,
    3. Chisholm SW
    . 2003. Cyanophages infecting the oceanic cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus. Nature 424:1047–1051.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Waterbury JB,
    2. Valois FW
    . 1993. Resistance to co-occurring phages enables marine Synechococcus communities to coexist with cyanophages abundant in seawater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:3393–3399.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Karl DM,
    2. Proctor L
    . 2007. Foundations of microbial oceanography. J. Oceanogr. 20:14–25.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    1. Lauro FM,
    2. et al
    . 2009. The genomic basis of trophic strategy in marine bacteria. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 106:15527–15533.
  51. 51.↵
    1. Polz MF,
    2. Hunt DE,
    3. Preheim SP,
    4. Weinreich DM
    . 2006. Patterns and mechanisms of genetic and phenotypic differentiation in marine microbes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 361:2009–2021.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Grime JP
    . 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242:344–347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Sillankorva S,
    2. Oliveira R,
    3. Vieira MJ,
    4. Sutherland I,
    5. Azeredo J
    . 2004. Pseudomonas fluorescens infection by bacteriophage Phi S1: the influence of temperature, host growth phase and media. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 241:13–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Bouvier T,
    2. Maurice CF
    . 2011. A single-cell analysis of Virioplankton adsorption, infection, and intracellular abundance in different bacterioplankton Physiologic categories. Microb. Ecol. 62:669–678.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Suttle CA,
    2. Chan AM
    . 1994. Dynamics and distribution of Cyanophages and their effects on marine Synechococcus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:3167–3174.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Moore LR,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Culturing the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 5:353–362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. Jia Y,
    2. Shan J,
    3. Millard A,
    4. Clokie MR,
    5. Mann NH
    . 2010. Light-dependent adsorption of photosynthetic cyanophages to Synechococcus sp. WH7803. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 310:120–126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    1. Cséke CS,
    2. Farkas GL
    . 1979. Effect of light on the attachment of cyanophage AS-1 to Anacystis-nidulans. J. Bacteriol. 137:667–669.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    1. Lindell D,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Genome-wide expression dynamics of a marine virus and host reveal features of co-evolution. Nature 449:83–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    1. Yooseph S,
    2. et al
    . 2007. The sorcerer II global ocean sampling expedition: expanding the universe of protein families. PLoS Biol. 5:0432–0466.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.↵
    1. Morris JJ,
    2. Johnson ZI,
    3. Szul MJ,
    4. Keller M,
    5. Zinser ER
    . 2011. Dependence of the cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus on hydrogen peroxide scavenging microbes for growth at the ocean’s surface. PLoS One 6:e16805.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Morris JJ,
    2. Kirkegaard R,
    3. Szul MJ,
    4. Johnson ZI,
    5. Zinser ER
    . 2008. Facilitation of robust growth of Prochlorococcus colonies and dilute liquid cultures by “helper” heterotrophic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:4530–4534.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Sher D,
    2. Thompson JW,
    3. Kashtan N,
    4. Croal L,
    5. Chisholm SW
    . 2011. Response of Prochlorococcus ecotypes to co-culture with diverse marine bacteria. ISME J. 5:1125–1132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. 64.↵
    1. Morris JJ,
    2. Lenski RE,
    3. Zinser ER
    . 2012. The Black Queen hypothesis: evolution of dependencies through adaptive Gene loss. mBio 3:e00036-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    1. John SG,
    2. et al
    . 2011. A simple and efficient method for concentration of ocean viruses by chemical flocculation. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 3:195–202.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    1. Duhaime MB,
    2. Deng L,
    3. Poulos BT,
    4. Sullivan MB
    . 2012. Towards quantitative metagenomics of wild viruses and other ultra-low concentration DNA samples: a rigorous assessment and optimization of the linker amplification method. Environ. Microbiol. 14:2526–2537.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. 67.↵
    1. Hurwitz BL,
    2. Deng L,
    3. Poulos BT,
    4. Sullivan MB
    . 2012. Evaluation of methods to concentrate and purify ocean virus communities through comparative, replicated metagenomics. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02836.x.
  68. 68.↵
    1. Allen LZ,
    2. et al
    . 2011. Single virus genomics: A New tool for virus discovery. PLoS One 6:e17722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    1. Nowak MA,
    2. et al
    . 1991. Antigenic diversity thresholds and the development of AIDS. Science 254:963–969.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.↵
    1. Gaschen B,
    2. et al
    . 2002. Diversity considerations in HIV-1 vaccine selection. Science 296:2354–2360.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. 71.↵
    1. Beerenwinkel N,
    2. et al
    . 2005. Computational methods for the design of effective therapies against drug resistant HIV strains. Bioinformatics 21:3943–3950.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. 72.↵
    1. Noble RT,
    2. Fuhrman JA
    . 1998. Use of SYBR Green I for rapid epifluorescence counts of marine viruses and bacteria. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 14:113–118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  73. 73.
    1. Sullivan MB,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Portal protein diversity and phage ecology. Environ. Microbiol. 10:2810–2823.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. 74.
    1. Sullivan MB,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Genomic analysis of oceanic cyanobacterial myoviruses compared with T4-like myoviruses from diverse hosts and environments. Environ. Microbiol. 12:3035–3056.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. 75.
    1. Pope WH,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Genome sequence, structural proteins, and capsid organization of the cyanophage Syn5: a “horned” bacteriophage of marine Synechococcus. J. Mol. Biol. 368:966–981.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  76. 76.
    1. Wichels A,
    2. et al
    . 1998. Bacteriophage diversity in the North Sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:4128–4133.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. 77.
    1. Sullivan MB,
    2. et al
    . 2009. The genome and structural proteome of an ocean siphovirus: a new window into the cyanobacterial “mobilome”. Environ. Microbiol. 11:2935–2951.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Contrasting Life Strategies of Viruses that Infect Photo- and Heterotrophic Bacteria, as Revealed by Viral Tagging
Li Deng, Ann Gregory, Suzan Yilmaz, Bonnie T. Poulos, Philip Hugenholtz, Matthew B. Sullivan
mBio Oct 2012, 3 (6) e00373-12; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00373-12

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contrasting Life Strategies of Viruses that Infect Photo- and Heterotrophic Bacteria, as Revealed by Viral Tagging
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Contrasting Life Strategies of Viruses that Infect Photo- and Heterotrophic Bacteria, as Revealed by Viral Tagging
Li Deng, Ann Gregory, Suzan Yilmaz, Bonnie T. Poulos, Philip Hugenholtz, Matthew B. Sullivan
mBio Oct 2012, 3 (6) e00373-12; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00373-12
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Introduction
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511