Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article

Novel Vaginal Microflora Colonization Model Providing New Insight into Microbicide Mechanism of Action

Raina N. Fichorova, Hidemi S. Yamamoto, Mary L. Delaney, Andrew B. Onderdonk, Gustavo F. Doncel
Peter Gilligan, Editor
Raina N. Fichorova
Laboratory of Genital Tract Biology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hidemi S. Yamamoto
Laboratory of Genital Tract Biology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary L. Delaney
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew B. Onderdonk
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gustavo F. Doncel
CONRAD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Gilligan
UNC Health Care System
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00168-11
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Colonization of human vaginal and cervical epithelial cells by vaginal bacteria showed consistent bacterial association with epithelial cells in the absence of apoptosis and cell toxicity. (A–D) Transmission electron microscopy image showing L. crispatus (A and B) and P. bivia (C and D) bacteria, visualized as electron-dense bodies, adherent to the surface of vaginal epithelial cells (Vk2/E6E7) with intact morphology after 24 h of colonization. The bars and images represent 500 nm and ×4,800 magnification (A), 500 nm and ×6,800 magnification (B), 2 µm and ×1,900 magnification (C), and 500 nm and ×13,000 magnification, respectively. (E) Caspase-3 cleavage is presented as percentages of cleaved total caspase-3 measured in vaginal epithelial cell lysates at 24 h after bacterial colonization or treatment with 1 µM staurosporine. Bars represent means and standard errors of the means (SEM) of the results determined with duplicate cultures used in two experiments. (F) Viability of vaginal epithelial cells assessed by trypan blue inclusion tests at 5 days postcolonization. Bars represent means and SEM of the results from triplicate culture experiments. (G) CFU counts per square centimeter of epithelial cell surface at 24 h and 48 h postcolonization of Vk2/E6E7 cells. Bars represent means and SEM of the results determined with triplicate cultures used in three experiments. (H) Parallel assessment of CFU counts associated with primary polarized (VEC-100) and immortalized monolayer (Ect1/E6E7) ectocervical epithelial cells at 48 h postcolonization.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Proinflammatory properties of vaginal microflora strains at 24 h postcolonization of epithelial monolayers in the absence of CS and HEC. (A) NF-κB activation assessed by luciferase activity. Bars represent means and SEM of the results determined with quadruplicate cultures in one of three independent experiments. (B) IL-8 levels measured in the vaginal epithelial cell culture supernatants. Bars represent means of the results determined with duplicate cultures in one of three experiments. For comparisons of the results determined with bacterially colonized cultures to those determined with control cultures without bacteria, ++ represents P < 0.01 and +++ represents P < 0.001 (ANOVA [Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test]).

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Cell viability determined by the MTT assay after 24 h of compound exposure. (A) Immortalized vaginal epithelial cell monolayers (Vk2/E6E7) exposed to the same dose range of cellulose sulfate and hydroxyethylcellulose; (B) comparison of primary polarized (VEC-100) and immortalized monolayer (Ect1/E6E7) ectocervical epithelial cells exposed to cellulose sulfate. Values represent means and SEM of the results determined with duplicate cultures in one of three experiments.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Effects of cellulose sulfate and hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) on bacterial colonization assessed after 24 h bacterial-epithelial coculture followed by 24h exposure to compound test doses. Bars represent means and SEM of CFUs associated with duplicate vaginal epithelial cell cultures in two experiments with two different batches of each test compound. For comparisons of the results determined with various compound doses to those determined with control medium, * represents P < 0.05, ** represents P < 0.01, and *** represents P < 0.001 (ANOVA [Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test]).

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Direct effects of hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) and cellulose sulfate on planktonic bacterial growth in the absence of epithelial cells. The bacterial suspensions that were used for epithelial colonization were simultaneously mixed with equal volumes of compound doses and incubated under anaerobic conditions for 24 h, followed by agar plating for enumeration of CFUs. Note that A. vaginae did not survive well in the absence of epithelial cells, whereas it maintained a stable colonization rate in the vaginal and cervical epithelial cells, as shown in Fig. 1G and H and 4D. Bars represent means and SEM of the results determined with triplicate cultures in two independent experiments performed with two different batches of test compounds. For comparisons of the results determined with various compound doses to those determined with control medium, *** represents P < 0.001 (ANOVA [Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test]).

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Compound-induced innate immune responses after 24 h of colonization with vaginal bacterial strains followed by 24 h of exposure to cellulose sulfate or hydroxyethylcellulose. Bars represent means and SEM of RANTES (AB), IL-8 (CD), and SLPI (EF) levels measured in supernatants from duplicate ectocervical epithelial cell cultures in one of three experiments with three different batches of cellulose sulfate. The dashed line represents medium-control basal levels in the absence of bacterial colonization. Similar results were obtained with the vaginal epithelial cells (data not shown). For comparisons of the results determined with various compound doses to those determined with control medium within each treatment group (shown at the bottom), * represents P < 0.05 and ** represents P < 0.01; for comparisons of the results determined with bacterially colonized cultures to those determined with cultures without bacteria for each compound dose, + represents P < 0.05 and ++ represents P<0.01 (ANOVA [Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test]).

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    Compound-induced NF-κB activation after 24 h of bacterial colonization followed by 24 h of exposure to cellulose sulfate (A) or hydroxyethylcellulose (B). Bars represent means and SEM from luciferase activity determinations performed with duplicate cultures in one of three experiments with three different batches of each test compound. For comparisons of the results determined with various compound doses to those determined with control medium within each treatment group (shown at the right), ** represents P < 0.01; for comparisons of the results determined with bacterially colonized cultures to those determined with cultures without bacteria for each compound dose, ++ represents P < 0.01 and +++ represents P < 0.001 (ANOVA [Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test]).

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Novel Vaginal Microflora Colonization Model Providing New Insight into Microbicide Mechanism of Action
Raina N. Fichorova, Hidemi S. Yamamoto, Mary L. Delaney, Andrew B. Onderdonk, Gustavo F. Doncel
mBio Oct 2011, 2 (6) e00168-11; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00168-11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel Vaginal Microflora Colonization Model Providing New Insight into Microbicide Mechanism of Action
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
Share
Novel Vaginal Microflora Colonization Model Providing New Insight into Microbicide Mechanism of Action
Raina N. Fichorova, Hidemi S. Yamamoto, Mary L. Delaney, Andrew B. Onderdonk, Gustavo F. Doncel
mBio Oct 2011, 2 (6) e00168-11; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00168-11
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Introduction
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511