Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article

Cryo-EM Structures of CusA Reveal a Mechanism of Metal-Ion Export

Mitchell A. Moseng, Meinan Lyu, Tanadet Pipatpolkai, Przemyslaw Glaza, Corey C. Emerson, Phoebe L. Stewart, Phillip J. Stansfeld, Edward W. Yu
Michael S. Gilmore, Editor
Mitchell A. Moseng
aDepartment of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meinan Lyu
aDepartment of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tanadet Pipatpolkai
bDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tanadet Pipatpolkai
Przemyslaw Glaza
aDepartment of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Corey C. Emerson
aDepartment of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phoebe L. Stewart
aDepartment of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Phoebe L. Stewart
Phillip J. Stansfeld
cSchool of Life Sciences & Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Phillip J. Stansfeld
Edward W. Yu
aDepartment of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Edward W. Yu
Michael S. Gilmore
Harvard Medical School
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00452-21
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Cryo-EM structure of the CusA trimer in the EEB state. (A) Ribbon diagram of the CusA trimer with two closed cleft “extrusion” state protomers and one open cleft “binding” state protomer viewed from the membrane plane with the “extrusion” and “binding” channels shown in yellow. (B) Ribbon diagram of the EEB CusA trimer viewed from the top of the periplasmic domain illustrating the channels (colored yellow) formed in the “binding” and “extrusion” states of the CusA protomers. (C) A cartoon displaying the conformation of the CusA trimer in the EEB form viewed from the top of the periplasmic domain. In panels A, B, and C, the two “extrusion” protomers and one “binding” protomer of CusA are colored pink, green, and blue, respectively. The bound Cu(I) ion in the “binding” protomer is represented as a dark orange circle. (D) The binding site of the Cu(I) ion (dark orange sphere) within the open periplasmic cleft of the “binding” protomer (blue). The bound Cu(I) ion is coordinated by residues M573, M623, E625, and M672 (gold sticks). The density of bound Cu(I) is shown in transparent light green.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Cryo-EM structure of the CusA trimer in the EBB state. (A) Ribbon diagram of the CusA trimer with one closed cleft “extrusion” state protomer and two open cleft “binding” state protomers viewed from the membrane plane with the “extrusion” and “binding” channels shown in yellow. (B) Ribbon diagram of the EBB CusA trimer viewed from the top of the periplasmic domain illustrating the channels (colored yellow) formed in the “binding” and “extrusion” states of the CusA protomers. (C) A cartoon displaying the conformation of the CusA trimer in the EBB form viewed from the top of the periplasmic domain. In panels A, B, and C, the one “extrusion” and two “binding” protomers of CusA are colored pink, green, and blue, respectively. The bound Cu(I) ions within the two “binding” protomers are represented as dark orange circles. (D) The binding site of the Cu(I) ion (dark orange sphere) within the open periplasmic cleft of the “binding” protomer (green). The bound Cu(I) ion is coordinated by residues M573, M623, E625, and M672 (gold sticks). The density of bound Cu(I) is shown in transparent light green.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Cryo-EM structure of the CusA trimer in the EEE state. (A) Ribbon diagram of the CusA trimer with three closed cleft “extrusion” state protomers viewed from the membrane plane with the “extrusion” channels shown in yellow. (B) Ribbon diagram of the EEE CusA trimer viewed from the top of the periplasmic domain illustrating the channels (colored yellow) formed in the “extrusion” states of the CusA protomers. (C) A cartoon displaying the conformation of the CusA trimer in the EEE form viewed from the top of the periplasmic domain. In panels A, B, and C, the three “extrusion” protomers of CusA are colored pink, green, and blue, respectively. (D) The Cu(I) binding site. No extra density representing bound Cu(I) is found within closed periplasmic cleft of this “extrusion” protomer (green). Residues M573, M623, E625, and M672 responsible for forming the Cu(I) binding site are in gold sticks.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Cryo-EM structure of the CusA trimer in the BBB state. (A) Ribbon diagram of the CusA trimer with three open cleft “binding” state protomers viewed from the membrane plane with the “binding” channels shown in yellow. (B) Ribbon diagram of the BBB CusA trimer viewed from the top of the periplasmic domain illustrating the channels (colored yellow) formed in the “binding” states of the CusA protomers. (C) A cartoon displaying the conformation of the CusA trimer in the BBB form viewed from the top of the periplasmic domain. In panels A, B, and C, the three “binding” protomers of CusA are colored pink, green, and blue, respectively. (D) The binding site of the Cu(I) ion (dark orange sphere) within the open periplasmic cleft of the “binding” protomer (pink). The bound Cu(I) ion is coordinated by residues M573, M623, E625, and M672 (gold sticks). The density of bound Cu(I) is shown in transparent light green.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    The proton relay and methionine relay networks. (A) The proton relay network of the CusA heavy-metal efflux pump. (Left) The binding state of CusA (light blue). In this conformational state, the “proton sweeper” K984 was found to have two alternate rotamer conformations. One rotamer forms a hydrogen bond (yellow dashed line) with D405. D405 also forms hydrogen bonds with E939 and T987. The other rotamer of K984 is positioned away from D405 and forms a hydrogen bond with S1027. Black arrows represent the motion of the TM helices when they shift to the extrusion state. The densities of residue side chains (D405, K984, E939, and T987), which form the proton relay network are represented as a gray transparent surface. (Right) The extrusion state of CusA (light pink). In this conformation, K984 is swung away from D405 oriented to participate in a dipole-dipole interaction with M944. Superimposition of the CusA TM domain of the binding and extrusion states gives rise to an r.m.s.d. of 1.2 Å. (B) The methionine relay network of the CusA heavy-metal efflux pump. (Top left) Ribbon diagram of the binding state protomer of CusA with the channel for metal ion transport (yellow) and methionine residues (dark gold sticks) participating in metal transport viewed from the transmembrane region of the “binding” protomer of the EEB structure with the channel spanning from the cytosol into the periplasmic cleft. Black arrows indicate magnification and rotation to view the methionine pairs. (Top right) The methionine pair M1009-M391 near the entrance into the periplasmic cleft. (Bottom left) The methionine pair M486-M403 positioned in the middle of the transmembrane domain. (Bottom right) The methionine pair M501-M410 with side chains oriented away from each other near the entryway into the transmembrane domain from the cytosol.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Conformational change of a CusA monomer. (A) The final frame of a monomeric CusA 500-ns simulation starting from the “binding” state (red). This is structurally aligned with cryo-EM structures of the “extrusion” state (yellow) and “binding” state (blue). The spheres show the positions of the Cα atoms of N651 and R705. (B) Distribution of distances between Cα atoms of R705 and N651 over the last 100 ns of 500-ns simulations from the “extrusion” state with Cu-bound (E-Cu [panel III]), no Cu (E-Apo [panel IV]), “binding” state without Cu(I) (B-Apo [panel II]) and “binding” state with Cu(I) (B-Cu [panel I]). (C) The final frame of a monomeric CusA 500-ns simulation starting from an “extrusion” state with a Cu(I) ion docked into the binding site. This is structurally aligned with cryo-EM structures of the “extrusion” state (yellow) and “binding” state (blue). The spheres show the positions of the Cα atoms of N651 and R705.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    Proton permeation path through the CusA protein. (A) An analysis of the pore profile along CusA (blue) with protonatable residues highlighted in red for acidic residues (D405 and E939) and blue for basic residues (K482 and K984). Pore-lining residues are highlighted in green for polar residues and brown for hydrophobic residues. Different subdomains are colored in purple (PC2), blue (PC1), orange (DC), yellow (DN), green (PN1), and red (PN2). (B) A path of proton permeation across the membrane via a water wire from basic residues (blue) to acidic residues (yellow) based on the “extrusion” state of a protomer from the EEE trimer. The structure displays a solvated pore after 20-ns equilibration with Cα restrained. Putative hydrogen bonds are shown as black dashes with distances in angstroms. (C) Calculated pKa values of the four acidic and basic residues in the transmembrane region of the protein from the last 100 ns of the 450-ns simulation in the trimeric CusA pump with and without Cu(I). Data are shown for three repeats of the three subunits. Error bars display the standard errors of the means (n = 9). (D) Calculated number of water molecules involved in the water wire from the last 100 ns of the 450-ns simulation of trimeric CusA with (blue) and without (yellow) Cu(I). Data are shown for three repeats of the three subunits only in the subunit when water molecules are present in the pore. Error bars display the standard errors of the means (n = 8).

  • FIG 8
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 8

    Proposed model of heavy-metal efflux mechanism. During heavy-metal export, each protomer of the trimeric CusA pump autonomously undergoes a sequence of conformational transitions. This schematic diagram indicates that each protomer within the CusA trimer is able to independently go through conformational transitions, leading to the extrusion of metal ions (B, “binding” state; E, “extrusion” state).

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • FIG S1

    Cryo-EM analysis of CusA. (A) Processing of 6,772 micrographs to obtain initial pool of 1,769,806 particles and 2D classification selecting for 549,454 particles. (B) 3D classification results. (C) Reconstruction of trimeric CusA gave rise to four different structures (EEE, EEB, EBB, and BBB). The PDB IDs for the structures of EEB, EBB, EEE, and BBB are 7KF7, 7KF8, 7KF5, and 7KF6, respectively. Each panel contains the cryo-EM analysis of the indicated CusA structure with a side view of the cryo-EM map density for the CusA state composed of the individual protomers (pink, green, and blue) assembled as a trimer into a lipid nanodisc (gray). Following is the cryo-EM map of the CusA trimer viewed from the top of the periplasmic domain beside representative 2D classes and the gold-standard Fourier shell correction (GS-FSC) resolution of the cryo-EM map. Download FIG S1, JPG file, 2.6 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Moseng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    CusA protomer state classification. Different states of the CusA protomers are classified by (A) the conformation of the periplasmic cleft as measured by the distance between residues L658 (at the right side of the cleft) and L714 (at the left side of the cleft), (B) the size of the exit site of the extrusion channel as measured by the distance between residues P54 and A754, which form this exit site, and (C) the conformation of the proton relay residues, including D405, E938, and K984, in the transmembrane domain. In panel A, the distance between L658 and L714 is 20.4 Å for the “binding” protomer (with the periplasmic cleft open) of the EEB structure (PDB ID 7KF7). This distance is 9.9 Å for the “extrusion” protomer (with the periplasmic cleft closed) of the EEE structure (PDB ID 7KF5). The L658-L714 distance is 9.9 Å for the “resting” protomer (with the periplasmic cleft closed) of the X-ray structure of apo-CusA (PDB ID 3KO7). In panel B, the distances between P54 and A754 for the “binding” (PDB ID 7KF7), “extrusion” (PDB ID 7KF5), and “resting” (PDB ID 3KO7) protomers are 7.7 Å, 8.5 Å, and 7.6 Å, respectively. In panel C, these are superimpositions of the six “binding” protomers (left panel) and six “extrusion” protomers (middle panel) from the EEB (7KF7), EBB (7KF8), EEE (7KF5), and BBB (7KF6) structures, showing the comparison of the proton relay network at different conformational states. The left panel shows the overlay comparison of the one “binding” protomer of CusA EEB (light green), two “binding” protomers of CusA EBB (pink), and three binding protomers of CusA BBB (blue). The middle panel shows the comparison of the one “extrusion” protomer of CusA EBB (light green), two “extrusion” protomers of CusA EEB (pink), and three “extrusion” protomers of CusA EEE (blue). The superimpositions suggest that the six “binding” protomers are very similar in conformation (left panel). Likewise, the conformation of the six “extrusion” protomers are very similar to each other. The right panel displays the proton relay network of the “resting” protomer (bright green) of the X-ray structure of apo-CusA. Download FIG S2, JPG file, 2.3 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Moseng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S1

    Cryo-EM data collection, processing, and refinement statistics. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.10 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Moseng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    Cα r.m.s.d. and residual r.m.s.f. (A) Cα r.m.s.d. of the cryo-EM structures. Calculated Cα r.m.s.d. of the first 200-ns simulation of the trimeric cryo-EM structures with three Cu(I)-bound subunits (BBB), two Cu(I)-bound subunits, and one extrusion state (EBB), one Cu(I)-bound state (EEB), and all three subunits in the extrusion state (EEE). The three colors indicate the three different repeats. The shaded region shows the running average every 1 ns. (B) Residual r.m.s.f. and secondary structure retention of the cryo-EM structures. Calculated residue r.m.s.f. of the first 200-ns simulation of the trimeric cryo-EM structures with three Cu(I)-bound subunits (BBB), two Cu(I)-bound subunits, and one extrusion state (EBB), one Cu(I)-bound state (EEB), and all three subunits in the extrusion state (EEE). The secondary structure analysis was sampled every 2 ns. The shaded region indicates the standard deviation around the mean of three repeats. (C) Residual r.m.s.f. and secondary structure retention of the monomeric structures. Calculated residue r.m.s.f. of 500-ns simulation of the monomeric structures with bound configuration in the presence and absence of copper (B-Cu and B-Apo) and the extruded state in the presence and absence of copper (E-Cu and E-Apo). The secondary structure analysis was sampled every 5 ns. The shaded region indicates the standard deviation around the mean of three repeats. Download FIG S3, JPG file, 1.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Moseng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    Simulations conditions and set-up. Download Table S2, PDF file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Moseng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S4

    Conformational change of CusA. (A) Conformational change between bound and extruded state structure in a monomer. Distances between Cα atoms of R705 and N651 over 500-ns simulations from the “extrusion” state without Cu(I) (E-Apo), “extrusion” state with Cu(I) (E-Cu), “binding” state without Cu(I) (B-Apo), and “binding” state with Cu(I) (B-Cu). The three colors indicate the three different repeats. (B) Conformational change of the CusA trimer in a modeled E. coli cell membrane. Distribution of distance between Cα R705 and Cα N651 over the last 100 ns of 450-ns simulations from the “binding” state with bound Cu(I) (BBB-Cu [A]), “binding” state without Cu(I) (BBB-Apo [B]), “extrusion” state with bound Cu(I) (EEE-Cu [ C]) and “extrusion” state without Cu(I) (EEE-Cu [D]). The distributions were taken from 3 monomers × 3 simulations, resulting in 909 data points per each analysis. (C) Conformational change of the CusA trimer. Measurement of distance between Cα R705 and Cα N651 over 450-ns simulations from the “binding” state with bound Cu(I) (BBB Cu), “binding” state without Cu(I) (BBB Apo), “extrusion” state with bound Cu(I) (EEE Cu), and “extrusion” state without Cu(I) (EEE Apo). The three colors indicate the three different repeats. The shaded region shows the running average every 1 ns. Download FIG S4, JPG file, 1.9 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Moseng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • MOVIE S1

    Transition from “binding” to “extrusion.” Download Movie S1, MP4 file, 7.4 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Moseng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • MOVIE S2

    Transition from “extrusion” to “binding.” Download Movie S2, MP4 file, 24.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Moseng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • MOVIE S3

    The membrane-spanning water wire. Download Movie S3, MP4 file, 11.8 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Moseng et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Cryo-EM Structures of CusA Reveal a Mechanism of Metal-Ion Export
Mitchell A. Moseng, Meinan Lyu, Tanadet Pipatpolkai, Przemyslaw Glaza, Corey C. Emerson, Phoebe L. Stewart, Phillip J. Stansfeld, Edward W. Yu
mBio Apr 2021, 12 (2) e00452-21; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00452-21

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cryo-EM Structures of CusA Reveal a Mechanism of Metal-Ion Export
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cryo-EM Structures of CusA Reveal a Mechanism of Metal-Ion Export
Mitchell A. Moseng, Meinan Lyu, Tanadet Pipatpolkai, Przemyslaw Glaza, Corey C. Emerson, Phoebe L. Stewart, Phillip J. Stansfeld, Edward W. Yu
mBio Apr 2021, 12 (2) e00452-21; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00452-21
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

CusA
antimicrobial resistance
cryo-EM
efflux pump
resistance-nodulation-cell division

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511