Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

Intracellular Density of Wolbachia Is Mediated by Host Autophagy and the Bacterial Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Gene cifB in a Cell Type-Dependent Manner in Drosophila melanogaster

Mark Deehan, Weiwei Lin, Benjamin Blum, Andrew Emili, Horacio Frydman
Luis Teixeira, Invited Editor, Margaret J. McFall-Ngai, Editor
Mark Deehan
aDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark Deehan
Weiwei Lin
bCenter for Network Systems Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Blum
bCenter for Network Systems Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Emili
bCenter for Network Systems Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Horacio Frydman
aDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
cNational Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Horacio Frydman
Luis Teixeira
Instituto Gulbenkian De Ciencia
Roles: Invited Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret J. McFall-Ngai
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02205-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Knockdown of selective autophagy increased density of Wolbachia strain wMel but not wMelCS in the hub. Representative confocal z-stacks of hubs expressing RNAi against autophagy genes. Unpaired (Upd) was used to express small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) specifically in the hub and not male germ line and soma in the testis. DNA is colored cyan, D cadherin (labeling the hub) is yellow, and the HSP60 antibody detecting Wolbachia is in magenta. The insets display grayscale images of only the Wolbachia channel from the respective image. (A) Sibling control hub of wMel-infected male testis displaying Wolbachia at a low density. (B) Knockdown of Atg1 increased wMel density in the hub. (C) Control Atg8 RNAi wMel-infected male hub displaying low Wolbachia density. (D) Knockdown of Atg8 in the hub increased wMel density. (E) Control Ref(2)p RNAi hub of wMel-infected male testis where Wolbachia is at a low density. (F) Knockdown of Ref(2)p with RNAi increases Wolbachia wMel density in the hub. (G) Vertical raincloud plots display each quantified value overlaid on a box and whisker plot showing the median value, upper and lower quartiles (box), and upper and lower extremes (whiskers, 1.5× interquartile range). A split violin plot accompanies each box and whisker plot which displays the probability density function of the data set. Quantification of relative Wolbachia density reveals a significant increase in Wolbachia density upon knockdown of either Atg1 (Ncont = 37, Nexp = 47), Atg8 (Ncont = 54, Nexp = 50), or Ref(2)p (Ncont = 44, Nexp = 52) in the hub. (H) Control Atg1 RNAi hub of wMelCS (CS)-infected male testis where Wolbachia is at a moderate/high density. (I) Knockdown of Atg1 has no significant effect on moderating the density of CS. (J) Control Atg8a RNAi hubs of CS-infected male testis display a moderate/high density. (K) Atg8a knockdown displays a moderate/high density of CS similar to that for the control. (L) Control Ref(2)p hub of wMelCS-infected hubs displays moderate density. (M) Knockdown of Ref(2)p does not result in any change in wMelCS density, displaying moderately infected hub densities. (N) Quantification of relative CS density in the hub shows no difference in density upon knockdown of Atg1 (Ncont = 39, Nexp = 31), Atg8 (Ncont = 36, Nexp = 36), or Ref(2)p (Ncont = 59, Nexp = 50). Scale bars, 5 µM. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed for statistical analysis.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Expression of Wolbachia cytoplasmic incompatibility genes CifA and CifB modulate wMel density in the hub. Representative confocal z-stacks of hubs with overexpressed Wolbachia Cif genes. Unpaired (Upd) was used to overexpress Cif constructs specifically in the hub and not male germ line and soma in the testis. DNA is cyan, D cadherin (labeling the hub) is yellow, and a fluorescently labeled DNA probe to detect Wolbachia is in magenta. Grayscale insets display the Wolbachia-only channel. (A) Sibling control hubs displayed low relative wMel density. (B) Overexpression of CifB resulted in higher relative wMel density. (C) Overexpression of CifA in the hub resulted in a trend for lower relative wMel density. (D) Overexpression of both CifA and CifB resulted in wMel hub density similar to that of the control. (E) A Kruskal-Wallis test of significance revealed a significant difference in the data set (P < 0.0001). Quantification of relative wMel hub density showed overexpression of CifA results in a nonsignificant trend for lower wMel densities (Ncont = 29, NCifA = 11, P < 0.0905). Overexpression of CifB results in a significant increase in wMel density compared to that in the control (Ncont = 29, NCifB = 33, P < 0.00001) and to those with both CifA and CifB overexpression (NCifB = 33, NcifA-B = 36, P < 0.0019). Overexpression of both CifA and CifB resulted in no difference from the control (Ncont = 29, NCifA-B = 36, P = 1.0). P values reported for individual comparisons were from a Kruskal-Wallis post hoc Dunn’s test with Bonferroni correction. Scale bars, 5 µM.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Epistasis analysis of Wolbachia CifB and Atg1 genes reveal Wolbachia effector CifB acts in the autophagy pathway. Representative confocal z-stacks of hubs. Unpaired (Upd) was used to express siRNAs or Cif constructs specifically in the hub and not male germ line and soma in the testis. DNA was not acquired for this experiment; D cadherin labeling the hub is yellow, and a fluorescently conjugated DNA probe to detect Wolbachia is in magenta. Grayscale insets display the Wolbachia-only channel. (A) Control hubs displayed low relative wMel density. (B) Overexpression of CifB resulted in higher relative wMel density. (C) Expression of Atg1 RNAi in the hub resulted in higher relative wMel density. (D) Overexpression of both CifB and Atg1 RNAi resulted in high wMel hub density, similar to that with Atg1 RNAi. (E) A Kruskal-Wallis test of significance revealed a significant difference in the data set (P < 0.0001). Quantification of relative wMel hub density showed overexpression of CifB results in a statistically significant increase in wMel density (Ncont = 20, NCifB = 22, P < 0.0001). Expression of Atg1 RNAi result in a significant increase in wMel density (Ncont = 29, NAtg1RNAi = 35, P < 0.0001). Coexpression of CifB and Atg1 RNAi results in a significant increase in wMel density compared to that in the control (NCont = 29, NCifB-Atg1RNAi = 33, P < 0.0001) and with CifB alone (NCifB-Atg1RNAi = 33, NCifB = 22, P < 0.0075) and a density similar to that with Atg1 RNAi expression alone (NAtg1RNAi = 35, NCifB-Atg1RNAi = 33, P = 1.0). P values reported for individual comparisons were from a Kruskal-Wallis post hoc Dunn’s test with Bonferroni correction. Scale bars, 5 µM.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Knockdown of autophagy in the female germ line decreases wMel density. Stage-specific confocal analysis reveals a decrease in relative Wolbachia density upon knockdown of autophagy genes during multiple stages of development. NGT;nos was used to knockdown Atg1, and MTD was used to knockdown Atg8a. DNA is colored cyan, D cadherin (labeling the follicle cells) is yellow, and a fluorescently conjugated DNA probe detecting Wolbachia is in magenta. Grayscale images display the Wolbachia-only channel. (A) Representative confocal z-stack images of control and Atg1 knockdown in the germ line of wMel-infected flies. (B) Quantification of wMel-infected stage-specific egg chambers upon Atg1 knockdown. Statistically significant P values are reported only. (C) Representative confocal z-stack images of wMel-infected stage-8 control egg chambers show high levels of germ line Wolbachia. (D) Representative confocal z-stack image of stage-8 egg chambers with Atg8 RNAi expression displays reduced wMel density in the germ line. (E) Quantification of wMel-infected stage-8 egg chambers for the control and Atg8 knockdown. Scale bars, 10 µM for stages 2 and 3, 20 µM for stages 4 to 6, and 40 µM for stages 7 and 8. Student’s t tests were conducted to determine significance.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Knockdown of autophagy in the female germ line decreases wMelCS density. Stage-specific confocal analysis reveals a decrease in relative Wolbachia density upon knockdown of autophagy genes during multiple stages of development. NGT;nos was used to knockdown Atg1, and MTD was used to knockdown Atg8a. DNA is colored cyan, D cadherin (labeling the follicle cells) is yellow, and a fluorescently labeled DNA probe detecting Wolbachia is in magenta. Grayscale images display the Wolbachia-only channel. (A) Representative confocal z-stack images of control and Atg1 knockdown in the germ line of wMelCS-infected flies. (B) Quantification of wMelCS-infected stage-specific egg chambers upon Atg1 knockdown. Statistically significant P values are reported only. (C) Representative confocal z-stack images of wMelCS-infected stage-8 egg chambers for control flies display a high Wolbachia density. (D) Representative confocal z-stack images of wMelCS-infected stage-8 egg chambers with Atg8 RNAi expressed display reduced germ line Wolbachia density. (E) Quantification of wMelCS-infected stage-8 egg chambers for the control and Atg8 knockdown reveal decreased density upon germ line expression of Atg8 RNAi. Scale bars, 10 µM for stages 2 and 3, 20 µM for stages 4 to 6, and 40 µM for stages 7 and 8. Student’s t tests were conducted to determine significance.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Ref(2)p does not regulate Wolbachia density in stage-8 egg chambers. (A) Representative confocal z-stack image of wMel-infected control stage-8 egg chamber shows moderate density of Wolbachia. NGT;nos was used to drive knockdown of Ref(2)p. DNA is colored cyan, D cadherin (labeling the follicle cells) is yellow, and a fluorescently labeled DNA probe to detect Wolbachia is in magenta. Grayscale images display the Wolbachia-only channel. (B) Representative confocal z-stack image of wMel-infected stage-8 egg chamber with Ref(2)p knocked down shows similar moderate density to that of the control. (C) Quantification of relative germ line Wolbachia density reveals no difference in density upon the expression of Ref(2)p RNAi. (D) Representative confocal z-stack image of wMelCS-infected control stage-8 egg chamber shows high germ line density. (E) Representative confocal z-stack image of wMelCS-infected stage-8 egg chamber with Ref(2)p knocked down displays similar germ line density to that of the control. (F) Scale bars, 40 µM. P values determined by Student’s t test.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    Differentially regulated metabolic pathways in Atg1 RNAi mutant ovaries of wMel-infected flies in the context of a metabolic model. All significantly differentiated pathways are reported between wMel-infected ovaries with autophagy knocked down (Atg1 RNAi) and the wild type. Downregulated metabolic pathways are highlighted with red, while upregulated pathways are green. Results are reported in the context of a proposed model of how they interact and could affect Wolbachia. NES, normalized enrichment score from fGSEA MetaboAnalyst results.

  • FIG 8
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 8

    Model of how autophagy regulates Wolbachia density differently in the germ line and somatic cell types. (A) Depiction of how autophagy regulates Wolbachia density in the hub in a strain-dependent manner. wMel is shown to be negatively regulated by selective autophagy. (B) In the germ line, Wolbachia is able to subvert Ref(2)p-mediated selective autophagy. Knockdown of autophagy proteins involved in bulk autophagy results in a decrease in Wolbachia density. This indicates a possible mechanism by which Wolbachia utilizes autophagy-derived nutrients for energy.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • FIG S1

    Ref(2)P staining confirms RNAi knockdown of autophagy genes. Ref(2)p is increased in tissues with autophagy knocked down. Image of hubs labeled with genotypes (control on the left, experimental on right) antibody stained for D-cadherin (yellow) and Ref(2)p (magenta). Prime-labeled panels are greyscale of Ref(2)p staining. (A) Control hub displays few small Ref(2)p puncta within the hub. (B) Atg1 RNAi expressed in the hub causes several smaller Ref(2)p puncta. (C) Control flies display several small Ref(2)p puncta within the hub. (D) Expression of Atg8a RNAi in the hub causes an increase in Ref(2)p puncta and size, indicating a block in autophagy. (E, E′) Control flies show a few small Ref(2)p puncta in the hub. (E′) Grayscale of the Ref(2)p channel is shown. (F) Ref(2)p RNAi knocks down expression of Ref(2)p in the hub. (F′) Grayscale image of Ref(2)p channel shows little to no expression of Ref(2)p in the hub. Scale bars, 5 µM. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 1.3 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Deehan et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Autophagy does not affect wMel and CS hub tropism. (A) Knockdown of either Atg1 or Atg8a does not affect the proportions of hubs displaying tropism for strain wMel. (B) Knockdown of Atg1 or Atg8a does not affect the proportions of hubs displaying tropism for the strain CS. (C) Ref(2)p knockdown does not affect hub tropism proportions in either wMel or CS. P values represent proportions test between control and knockdown. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 2.0 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Deehan et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    Knockdown efficiency of autophagy-related mRNA in the ovaries upon RNAi expression. RT-qPCR used to determine knockdown efficiency of different RNAi constructs in whole female ovaries. Genes were normalized to RPL32 expression. (A) Two replicates of 20 ovary pools show a knockdown efficiency of 64%. (B) Three replicates of 20 ovary pools shows an Atg8a knockdown efficiency of 47% when the NGT;nos driver was used. (C) Three replicates of 20 ovary pools show a Ref(2)p knockdown efficiency of 87%. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.8 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Deehan et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S4

    Starvation does not modify the effect of autophagy knockdown on Wolbachia density in the germline. Quantitative PCR of WSP normalized to 14-3-3 of 20 whole ovaries from 10 females. (A) Whole-ovary quantitative PCR of Wolbachia density revealed significant decreases in Wolbachia density upon knockdown of Atg1 under well fed and 2-day starvation conditions. Four-day starvation resulted in a similar trend in reduced Wolbachia density but was not significant. P values represent paired Student’s t test results. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 1.9 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Deehan et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S5

    Quantitative PCR of Ref(2)p RNAi mutants reveals no change in Wolbachia density in the female germline. (A) Quantitative PCR of wMel-infected ovaries reveals no change in density upon the knockdown of Ref(2)p. Five replicates of 20 ovary pools were used to determine average Wolbachia density. (B) Quantitative PCR of wMelCS-infected ovaries reveals no change in density upon the knockdown of Ref(2)p. Two replicates of 20 ovary pools were used to determine average Wolbachia density. Paired Student’s t tests were used for statistical analysis. Download FIG S5, PDF file, 0.6 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Deehan et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S6

    CifA and CifB overexpression do not affect wMel density in the female germline. NGT;nos was used to overexpress Cif constructs. DNA is colored cyan, D cadherin (labeling the follicle cells) is yellow, and a fluorescently conjugated DNA probe detecting Wolbachia is in magenta. (A) Control stage-8 egg chambers show high germline Wolbachia densities. (B) Stage-8 egg chambers overexpressing CifB result in a nonsignificant trend for lower relative wMel density. (C) Stage-8 egg chambers with overexpressed CifA result in a Wolbachia density similar to that in control egg chambers. (D) Stage-8 egg chambers overexpressing both CifA and CifB result in germline Wolbachia densities similar to that of the control. (E) A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the data set (P = 0.0171). A post hoc Tukey’s analysis revealed a significant difference between CifB overexpression and CifA-CifB overexpression groups (NCifB = 30, NCifA-CifB = 26, P = 0.024). Of note, CifB showed a trend for reduced wMel density in the germline compared to that in the control (NCont = 27, NCifB = 30, P = 0.0704). Grayscale panels display the Wolbachia-only channel. Scale bars, 40 µM. Download FIG S6, PDF file, 2.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Deehan et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S7

    Wolbachia infection and autophagy knockdown drive different metabolic profiles. (A) Heat map indicating Z-score values for each detected positive ion mode metabolite. (B) Principal-component analysis of all positive ion mode-detected features. Download FIG S7, PDF file, 2.4 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Deehan et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S1

    Positive ion metabolites and differentially regulated pathways. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 6.9 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Deehan et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    Drosophila fly stock genotypes used in experiments. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Deehan et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S3

    Average CT values in qPCR experiments. Download Table S3, XLSX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2021 Deehan et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Intracellular Density of Wolbachia Is Mediated by Host Autophagy and the Bacterial Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Gene cifB in a Cell Type-Dependent Manner in Drosophila melanogaster
Mark Deehan, Weiwei Lin, Benjamin Blum, Andrew Emili, Horacio Frydman
mBio Jan 2021, 12 (1) e02205-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02205-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intracellular Density of Wolbachia Is Mediated by Host Autophagy and the Bacterial Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Gene cifB in a Cell Type-Dependent Manner in Drosophila melanogaster
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Intracellular Density of Wolbachia Is Mediated by Host Autophagy and the Bacterial Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Gene cifB in a Cell Type-Dependent Manner in Drosophila melanogaster
Mark Deehan, Weiwei Lin, Benjamin Blum, Andrew Emili, Horacio Frydman
mBio Jan 2021, 12 (1) e02205-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02205-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Wolbachia
autophagy
effector functions
host-pathogen interactions
innate immunity
symbiosis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511