Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Applied and Environmental Science

Availability of the Molecular Switch XylR Controls Phenotypic Heterogeneity and Lag Duration during Escherichia coli Adaptation from Glucose to Xylose

Manon Barthe, Josué Tchouanti, Pedro Henrique Gomes, Carine Bideaux, Delphine Lestrade, Carl Graham, Jean-Philippe Steyer, Sylvie Meleard, Jérôme Harmand, Nathalie Gorret, Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet, Brice Enjalbert
Pablo Ivan Nikel, Invited Editor, Sang Yup Lee, Editor
Manon Barthe
aTBI, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josué Tchouanti
bCMAP, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, IP Paris, Palaiseau, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pedro Henrique Gomes
aTBI, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carine Bideaux
aTBI, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Delphine Lestrade
cTWB, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRA, INSA, Ramonville-Saint-Agne, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carl Graham
bCMAP, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, IP Paris, Palaiseau, France
dInria‡
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Philippe Steyer
eINRAE, Université de Montpellier, LBE, Narbonne, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sylvie Meleard
bCMAP, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, IP Paris, Palaiseau, France
dInria‡
fInstitut Universitaire de France‡
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jérôme Harmand
eINRAE, Université de Montpellier, LBE, Narbonne, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathalie Gorret
aTBI, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet
aTBI, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet
Brice Enjalbert
aTBI, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pablo Ivan Nikel
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability
Roles: Invited Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sang Yup Lee
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02938-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    The length of the glucose-xylose lags in E. coli is background dependent. Thirteen different strains of E. coli were cultivated by switching strains previously grown on M9 glucose medium to 96-well microplates filled with 200 μl of fresh M9 xylose or M9 glucose medium. (A) Lag times (bars) and maximum growth rates (μmax) (circles) after the switch to glucose (white) or xylose (gray) for the 13 E. coli strains (n = 9 with 3 technical replicates for each of the 3 biological replicates). (B) Scatterplot of the regrowth lag time on xylose or glucose as a function of the maximum growth rate on xylose or glucose for each strain (gray circles for xylose, white circles for glucose). (C) Scatterplot of glucose-xylose diauxic lag times versus regrowth lag times (cells grown overnight on glucose switched to xylose). For diauxic growth, strains previously grown on glucose were transferred to a glucose-xylose M9 medium (12.5% glucose and 87.5% xylose). Diauxic lags were calculated as explained in Materials and Methods. The negative regrowth lag time calculated for the BL21 strain was due to a higher growth rate when this strain resumed growth on xylose than its maximum growth rate during its exponential growth on xylose. For diauxic lags, n = 9 for strains BW25113, 1404, LF82, and S5Vir, and n = 6 for strains MG1655, E2348/69, E22, BL21(DE3), BW3070, CA244, M1/5, Nissle 1917, and SP15 strains.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    XylR overexpression reduces regrowth lag time during the glucose-xylose shift of different E. coli strains. Strains carrying the pMET219 plasmid as a control (white symbols) or the same backbone plasmid with xylR expression under the control of the cysG constitutive promoter (pMET219_xylR; gray symbols), were grown like those shown in Fig. 1A (9 biological replicates but for strain E22 without xylR overexpression where n = 6; ** indicates a significant P value of <0.01 compared to the control strain not overexpressing xylR). The bars represent the lag time (in hours) before growth resumed. The circles represent the growth rates.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    XylR titration modifies regrowth lag time. The ability of the E. coli BW25113 strain to resume growth with different plasmid constructs was assessed by switching cells after overnight culture on glucose to a 96-well microplate filled with 200 μl of fresh M9 xylose (A) or M9 glucose (B) medium. The BW25113 strain (in black) with the empty pSB1C3 plasmid as a control, the BW25113 strain (in blue) with a pSB1C3 plasmid carrying the xylA promoter, the BW25113 strain (in red) with a pSB1C3 plasmid expressing the red fluorescent protein mRFP1 under the control of the xylA promoter, and the BW25113 strain (in green) with a pSB1C3 expressing mRFP1 under the control of a xylA promoter deprived of its XylR binding sites. n = 6 for all conditions.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    The length of the transition in the modified BW25113 strain is related to the emergence of a new subpopulation. Batch fermentations of the BW25113 strain transformed with the pSB1C3 plasmid carrying the PihfB-BFP PxylA-mRFP1 construct were carried out in minimum medium of 90 mMeqC and sampled at 30-min intervals. (A) Kinetics of substrate consumption and production and growth of the strain in M9 medium supplemented with a 40% glucose and 60% xylose mix. (B) Cytometric profiles of the 40% glucose−60% xylose batch over time. The y axis displays the blue fluorescence levels in arbitrary fluorescence units (a.f.u.), and the x axis displays the red fluorescence levels (a.f.u.). The blue gate represents the glucose population type as seen with the 100% glucose control. The red gate represents the xylose population type as seen with the 100% xylose control. (C) The theoretical biomass of each subpopulation was extrapolated from the percentages resulting from the flow cytometry analyses during growth on the 40% glucose and 60% xylose mix (glucose type cells in blue, xylose type cells in red, and the whole population in gray). (D) Same representation with 100% glucose growth. (E) Same representation with 100% xylose growth. Others substrate ratios are presented in Fig. S2 in the supplemental material.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Previous exposure to xylose creates a memory effect. The strain with the titration plasmid was grown on xylose and switched to a glucose-xylose mix on microplates with different concentrations of inoculant so that the number of generations on glucose differs between two growth phases on xylose. The duration of the diauxic lags are represented as a function of the number of generations on glucose. For each condition, four replicates were performed. n = 4 for all generation numbers but the highest (n = 2).

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Modeling subpopulation behavior. (A) Scheme of the stochastic model. The diagram shows individual growth and transitions between cell types in the population. X1 corresponds to glucose consumers with the basal level of XylR, Y to xylose consumers with a high level of XylR, and X2 to glucose consumers that previously grew on xylose with an initially high but decreasing level of XylR. We assume that these mechanisms occur after a random time distributed according to an exponential law with the corresponding rates. Indeed, an individual that grows on glucose (class X1 or X2) divides at rate b1(S1) or switches to xylose consumption at rate λ(S) and (1+θ)λ(S), respectively. Specifically, in the X2 compartment, where cells have many xylR copies, each individual can give birth to a cell of the compartment X1 with probability 0 < α < 1 because of xylR dilution. In addition, an individual growing on xylose (class Y) divides at rate b2(S2) or switches to glucose consumption (class X2) at rate η(S1), if glucose is abundant. (B) Validation and predictions of the model (solid lines) compared to the experimental data (crosses) during growth on six glucose-xylose mixes (glucose cell type in blue, xylose cell type in red, glucose in green, and xylose in violet). The conditions 80% glucose−20% xylose and 20% glucose−80% xylose were not used to estimate the model parameters. The lines represent predictions, whereas in the other conditions, they represent validation.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • TABLE 1

    Escherichia coli strains used in the study

    TABLE 1
  • TABLE 2

    Plasmids used in this study

    TABLE 2

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • FIG S1

    Median fluorescence intensity of E. coli BW25113 strain carrying the dual fluorescence plasmid. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Barthe et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Kinetics of substrate consumption and production and growth of the strain in M9 medium supplemented with a 100% glucose, 80% glucose and 20% xylose mix, 60% glucose and 40% xylose mix, 40% glucose and 60% xylose mix, 80% glucose and 20% xylose mix, or 100% xylose. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Barthe et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    The biomass of each subpopulation extrapolated from the percentages resulting from the flow cytometry analyses during the growth on 100% glucose, 80% glucose and 20% xylose mix, 60% glucose and 40% xylose mix, 40% glucose and 60% xylose mix, 80% glucose and 20% xylose mix, or 100% xylose. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.8 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Barthe et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TEXT S1

    Mathematical modeling of an E. coli batch culture on glucose and xylose. Download Text S1, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Barthe et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S4

    Experimental and prediction data for the wild-type strain BW25113 on a glucose-xylose mix. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.6 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Barthe et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S5

    Sequence of the xylA mutated promoter used in this study. Download FIG S5, PDF file, 0.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Barthe et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S6

    List of primers used to build the plasmids used in this study. Download FIG S6, PDF file, 0.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Barthe et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S7

    Demonstration of the diauxic lag formula. Download FIG S7, PDF file, 0.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Barthe et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Availability of the Molecular Switch XylR Controls Phenotypic Heterogeneity and Lag Duration during Escherichia coli Adaptation from Glucose to Xylose
Manon Barthe, Josué Tchouanti, Pedro Henrique Gomes, Carine Bideaux, Delphine Lestrade, Carl Graham, Jean-Philippe Steyer, Sylvie Meleard, Jérôme Harmand, Nathalie Gorret, Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet, Brice Enjalbert
mBio Dec 2020, 11 (6) e02938-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02938-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Availability of the Molecular Switch XylR Controls Phenotypic Heterogeneity and Lag Duration during Escherichia coli Adaptation from Glucose to Xylose
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Availability of the Molecular Switch XylR Controls Phenotypic Heterogeneity and Lag Duration during Escherichia coli Adaptation from Glucose to Xylose
Manon Barthe, Josué Tchouanti, Pedro Henrique Gomes, Carine Bideaux, Delphine Lestrade, Carl Graham, Jean-Philippe Steyer, Sylvie Meleard, Jérôme Harmand, Nathalie Gorret, Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet, Brice Enjalbert
mBio Dec 2020, 11 (6) e02938-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02938-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

adaptation
Escherichia coli
subpopulations
heterogeneity
metabolic transition

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511