Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Minireview | Host-Microbe Biology

Defensive Properties of Mucin Glycoproteins during Respiratory Infections—Relevance for SARS-CoV-2

Maitrayee Chatterjee, Jos P. M. van Putten, Karin Strijbis
Danielle A. Garsin, Editor
Maitrayee Chatterjee
aDepartment Biomolecular Health Sciences, Division Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Maitrayee Chatterjee
Jos P. M. van Putten
aDepartment Biomolecular Health Sciences, Division Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jos P. M. van Putten
Karin Strijbis
aDepartment Biomolecular Health Sciences, Division Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karin Strijbis
Danielle A. Garsin
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02374-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Mucus plays a pivotal role in protecting the respiratory tract against microbial infections. It acts as a primary contact site to entrap microbes and facilitates their removal from the respiratory tract via the coordinated beating of motile cilia. The major components of airway mucus are heavily O-glycosylated mucin glycoproteins, divided into gel-forming mucins and transmembrane mucins. The gel-forming mucins MUC5AC and MUC5B are the primary structural components of airway mucus, and they enable efficient clearance of pathogens by mucociliary clearance. MUC5B is constitutively expressed in the healthy airway, whereas MUC5AC is upregulated in response to inflammatory challenge. MUC1, MUC4, and MUC16 are the three major transmembrane mucins of the respiratory tracts which prevent microbial invasion, can act as releasable decoy receptors, and activate intracellular signal transduction pathways. Pathogens have evolved virulence factors such as adhesins that facilitate interaction with specific mucins and mucin glycans, for example, terminal sialic acids. Mucin expression and glycosylation are dependent on the inflammatory state of the respiratory tract and are directly regulated by proinflammatory cytokines and microbial ligands. Gender and age also impact mucin glycosylation and expression through the female sex hormone estradiol and age-related downregulation of mucin production. Here, we discuss what is currently known about the role of respiratory mucins and their glycans during bacterial and viral infections of the airways and their relevance for the novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Understanding the impact of microbe-mucin interaction in the respiratory tract could inspire the development of novel therapies to boost mucosal defense and combat respiratory infections.

INTRODUCTION

MUCUS: FIRST LINE OF DEFENSE IN THE RESPIRATORY TRACT

Mucus plays a vital role in protecting the respiratory tract from chemical, microbiological, and physical noxious environmental factors. The respiratory tract can be classified into two zones: the upper respiratory airway and the lower respiratory airway. The upper respiratory tract includes the nose, the pharynx, and the larynx, which are located outside the chest cavity, while the lower respiratory tract comprises the trachea, the lungs, and all segments of the bronchial tree (including the alveoli) (Fig. 1A). The respiratory airways are lined with pseudostratified epithelium and are made up of three major cell types: ciliated cells, nonciliated secretory cells (goblet cells), and basal cells (1). Goblet cells secrete soluble mucus that acts as the first line of defense by protecting underlying epithelial cells from invading pathogens (Fig. 1B). The airway mucus layer is part of the innate defense mechanism and is aimed at trapping and keeping the microbes away from the host epithelial cell surface, a process called mucociliary clearance (MCC). MCC requires the coordinated functions of the secretory cells that release mucus and of the motile cilia on multiciliated cells to control the viscoelasticity and resulting transportability of secreted mucus, respectively (2, 3). Due to the MCC, the mucus layer is continuously renewed. The nasal mucus is replaced every 10 min. whereas mucus in the human lower respiratory tract is transported upward with a velocity of about 100 μm per s, resulting in complete turnover within minutes to hours. This high turnover rate is one of the major protective features of the respiratory mucosa (4). The mucus system captures and removes incoming pathogens, thereby preventing invasion of underlying epithelial cells. In this minireview, we summarize what is known about the respiratory mucosal defense system in the context of bacterial and viral infections and discuss its importance during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Mucosal defense in the respiratory tract during SARS-CoV-2 infection. (A) Human upper and lower respiratory tracts. (B) Respiratory epithelium with ciliated cells, goblet cells, and a submucosal gland. The soluble mucin MUC5AC is secreted by goblet cells, and the soluble mucin MUC5B is secreted by mucosal cells in the submucosal gland. (C) Ciliated epithelial cells express transmembrane mucins MUC1 (red), MUC4 (blue), and MUC16 (yellow) and the SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor ACE2. (D) Domain structure of transmembrane mucins MUC1, MUC4, and MUC16. Mucin O-glycan structures and, specifically, terminal sialic acids play an important role in virus-mucin interactions.

MUCINS, THE PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF MUCUS

The principal components of mucus are high-molecular-weight (HMW) mucin glycoproteins. To date, 22 different human mucins genes have been identified. The major mucins produced in the airways are soluble mucins MUC5AC and MUC5B, which are secreted by goblet cells, and the transmembrane mucins MUC1, MUC4, and MUC16, which are expressed on the apical surface of all epithelial cell types along the different tissues of the respiratory tract (5). The glycan structures on the extracellular domains of transmembrane mucins attract water, thereby forming a fluid layer surrounding the cilia. This layer is called the periciliary layer and is essential for normal ciliary action to remove mucus from the airways. A viscoelastic airway mucus gel is located on top of the periciliary layer that consists of gel-forming mucins which have been secreted by goblet cells (6).

Soluble and transmembrane mucins contain highly glycosylated variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) regions that are rich in proline, threonine, and serine (PTS) repeats. These amino acid residues are potential O-glycosylation sites for attachment of complex carbohydrate structures that contain N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), N-acetylglucosamine, fucose, galactose, sialic acid (N-acetylneuraminic acid), and traces of mannose. The O-glycan structures that are attached to mucins constitute up to 80% of the total molecular weight of the final mucin glycoprotein. During mucin synthesis, O-glycosylation is initiated in the Golgi apparatus after addition of the primary GalNAc to a serine or threonine residue on the mucin protein backbone, resulting in GalNAc-O-Ser/Thr or Tn antigen structures. This first step in mucin O-glycosylation can be catalyzed by up to 20 polypeptide GalNAc transferases (ppGalNAcTs). The next step in mucin O-glycosylation is the attachment of core 1, 2, and 3 structures. Core 1, also called T antigen, is synthesized by C1GalT1 and consists of Galβ1-3GalNAc structures. Core 1 can be converted to core 2 by the action of C2GnT1-3 enzymes, resulting in Galβ1-3(GlcNAcβ1-6)GalNAc structures. Core 3 is a GlcNAcβ1-3GalNAc structure that is synthesized from Tn antigen by the β3GnT6 enzyme. Once the core structures are attached, 30 or more distinct glycosyltransferases sequentially add other sugar moieties, resulting in the completed O-glycan structure. Sialyltransferases and fucosyltransferases often terminate chain elongation and branching, thereby generating mucins with terminal charged sialic acid and hydrophobic fucose residues that represent the interaction surface that is involved when engaging with microbes (7). Mucin expression and O-glycosylation are altered under inflammatory conditions of the respiratory tract and are directly affected by colonization and invasion by bacteria and viruses.

SOLUBLE GEL-FORMING MUCINS OF THE RESPIRATORY TRACT

The gel forming mucins MUC5AC and MUC5B are the primary macromolecular components of airway mucus and facilitate airway clearance by mucociliary transport. In healthy individuals, MUC5AC is produced by goblet cells in the nasal mucosa and tracheobronchial surface epithelium of the lower respiratory tract (Fig. 1B) (6). In contrast, MUC5B expression is restricted to the lower respiratory tract. MUC5AC and MUC5B play distinct roles in maintaining a healthy airway epithelium. MUC5B is the primary mucin in healthy human airways and is constitutively expressed. MUC5B is secreted as large linear mucus bundles by the mucous cells in the bronchial submucosal glands, which is achieved by the combination of intracellular packing of the mucin and gland morphology (Fig. 1B) (8). The degrees of sialylation of MUC5B differ between healthy and diseased airways, with the highly charged sialylated glycoform being predominant in healthy airways (9). MUC5AC is produced at much lower levels in healthy airways but is upregulated in response to microbial infection and inflammatory cytokines (10). The protein backbones of both MUC5AC and MUC5B contain multidomain structures with central O-glycosylated tandem repeats flanked by D, B, C, and CK domains. The two secreted mucins share common glycans and core structures, but MUC5AC is more extensively fucosylated than MUC5B. These fucose groups impart hydrophobic properties on MUC5AC, resulting in inhibition of MCC and mucus turnover under inflammatory conditions (5).

EPITHELIAL TRANSMEMBRANE MUCINS OF THE RESPIRATORY TRACT

Transmembrane mucins are long extended molecules that protrude from the apical surface of the epithelium. They consist of a heavily O-glycosylated N-terminal extracellular domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain. In most transmembrane mucins (except MUC4), the glycosylated extracellular domain is noncovalently associated with the transmembrane domain at the sea urchin sperm protein, enterokinase, and agrin (SEA) domain, which is autoproteolytically cleaved in the endoplasmic reticulum (11). MUC1 and MUC4 are expressed in the upper and lower respiratory tracts, whereas MUC16 is expressed only in the lower respiratory tract (12). In the lung, MUC1 mainly localizes around microvilli and extends at least 100 nm from the cell surface. MUC4, which is about 300 nm in size, and the even larger MUC16 are expressed on the surface of cilia (13) (Fig. 1C). MUC1, MUC4, and (possibly) MUC16 are closely associated with the liquid periciliary layer surrounding the microvilli and cilia. Because of their high levels of sialic acid and sulfate content, they provide a strongly negatively charged milieu around the airway epithelia. This facilitates the formation of mucin rafts of secreted mucins MUC5AC and MUC5B and their continuous removal from the lungs (12). Transmembrane mucins themselves form a barrier that prevents pathogen invasion of the underlying epithelium. In addition, pathogen binding can induce serine and/or tyrosine phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tail (14). Through the combined functions of the extracellular domain and the cytoplasmic tail, transmembrane mucins sense the external environment and activate intracellular signal transduction pathways. Transmembrane mucin-associated signaling pathways have been implicated in controlling inflammation and immune responses to infectious agents and in maintenance of the mucosal barrier (12, 13). While all transmembrane mucin cytoplasmic tails contain putative phosphorylation sites, the tails are highly diverse between different transmembrane mucins. However, tails of specific transmembrane mucins are conserved across species, suggesting important interspecies mucin-specific signaling functions (14).

An additional mechanism of mucin defense is shedding of the extracellular domain from the cell surface into the lumen. When microbes are bound to transmembrane mucins, mucin shedding can result in release of mucin-bound pathogens from the cell and clearance from the body via the MCC (15). Mucin shedding can take place at the noncovalently attached SEA domain or by proteolytic cleavage by endogenous proteases such as disintegrin and metalloprotease domain containing protein-17 (ADAM17) or membrane type 1 matrix metalloprotease (MMP-MT1) (16). The specific mechanisms of transmembrane mucin shedding in the respiratory tract have not been studied. As a group, the different transmembrane mucins provide important protection against invading pathogens during airway infection at several different levels. Studying the functions of individual transmembrane mucins and their glycosylation during infection could provide a promising direction to develop new strategies to improve mucosal defenses.

CHANGES IN MUCIN EXPRESSION AND GLYCOSYLATION DURING INFLAMMATION

Under inflammatory conditions, expression of soluble and transmembrane mucins is increased, and their glycosylation is altered to boost mucosal defense. These changes alter the interaction interface. The transmembrane mucin MUC1 is upregulated in the oral mucosal epithelia by proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6), gamma interferon (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (17). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of the bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Haemophilus influenzae enhances MUC5AC expression and impedes mucin glycosylation and sulfation (18). During pulmonary disease, expression of MUC4 is increased in the presence of the inflammatory protease neutrophil elastase, possibly to activate epithelial repair mechanisms (19). TNF-α also alters the sialylation of mucins in tracheal cells and changes the expression of fucosyltransferases and α2,3-sialyltransferases in normal bronchial mucosal explants (20). Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-9, and IL-13) and TNF-α increase sialylation and the negative charge of mucins, thereby contributing to defense mechanisms during epithelial injury. Negatively charged mucin carbohydrates inhibit the effect of cationic inflammatory proteins such as human neutrophil elastase and lysozyme as well as bacterial enzymes such as proteases and elastase and glycosidic enzymes which cleave carbohydrates from the mucin glycoprotein (21, 22). As mentioned above, MUC5B is upregulated under inflammatory conditions (10) and its increased fucosylation could negatively impact MCC and mucus turnover (5). Alterations in expression of fucosyltransferases and their fucosylated glycan products have also been observed in inflammatory diseases of the airway such as asthma and cystic fibrosis (17, 19).

BACTERIAL INTERACTIONS WITH SOLUBLE MUCINS AND MUCIN GLYCANS

The soluble mucins of the respiratory tract pose a strong barrier that prevents invasion by the majority of bacterial and viral pathogens. However, respiratory pathogens such as P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, H. influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes have evolved virulence factors to interact with mucins and mucin glycans during the course of airway infection (23). Experiments with mucin knockout and overexpression mice demonstrated that the soluble mucins play key roles in preventing microbial infection. Mice with knockouts for Muc5b were prone to bacterial infections and displayed a number of severe deficiencies in respiratory function. The lower respiratory tract of Muc5b knockout mice contained bacteria (particularly S. aureus) and inflammatory infiltrates and decreased levels of IL-23, a mediator of antimicrobial inflammatory responses, and the Muc5b knockout mice showed accumulation of impaired phagocytic macrophages in the lungs (24). S. pneumoniae is a commensal bacterium that resides in the human nasopharynx, typically without causing disease. However, under favorable conditions, S. pneumoniae can migrate from the nasopharynx to other sites of the body such as the lungs and bloodstream, causing pneumonia and sepsis. Pneumolysin, a virulence factor secreted by S. pneumoniae, played an important role in MUC5AC induction via Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-dependent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) both in human epithelial cells and in mice (25).

Several studies have reported that the terminal sugars of mucin O-glycans and, particularly, sialic acids play a key role in interactions with respiratory pathogens. S. pyogenes, the causative agent of acute pharyngitis and impetigo, primarily colonizes the upper respiratory pharyngeal mucosa. Streptococci first need to traverse the mucus layer in order to adhere to the underlying epithelial cells. Streptococcal surface M protein interacts with α2-6-linked sialic acid in bovine soluble mucins. Additionally, it was reported previously that sialic acids on cell surface proteins play a significant role in the binding of streptococci to pharyngeal epithelial cells (26). Sialic acids can also serve as binding receptors for P. aeruginosa (27) and H. influenzae (28). The flagellin of P. aeruginosa preferentially binds mucin sialyl-Lewisx moieties, which contain both sialic acid and fucose monosaccharides. Intriguingly, there is evidence that P. aeruginosa can increase the sialyl-LewisX content on mucins via its secreted virulence factor pyocyanin, thereby making the host environment more favorable for bacterial attachment to surface mucins and colonization (29). Furthermore, it was reported previously that S. pneumoniae prefers to adhere to oligosaccharide ligands terminating in NeuAcα2-3Galβ1 (or NeuAcα2-6Galβ1) in the human airway (30). Similarly, the surface-associated high-molecular-weight protein 1 (HMW1) adhesin of H. influenzae is mostly dependent on α2-3-linked sialic acid (31). Because interactions between pathogens and mucin glycans are very specific, these processes are attractive targets for novel drug development.

FUNCTIONS OF TRANSMEMBRANE MUCIN DURING RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS WITH BACTERIAL PATHOGENS

MUC1 is the most extensively studied transmembrane mucin and is expressed in both the nasal cavity and lower respiratory tract. MUC1 extends 100 nm from the plasma membrane, localizes around microvilli, and has been shown to play an important defensive role during infection by various bacterial pathogens. P. aeruginosa can cause acute and chronic respiratory tract infections. Various papers have demonstrated that MUC1 plays an anti-inflammatory role during infection with P. aeruginosa. In vivo studies with Muc1 knockout mice showed increased inflammation compared to wild-type mice during airway infection with P. aeruginosa (32). At the molecular level, the flagellin of P. aeruginosa interacts with the extracellular domain of MUC1. During P. aeruginosa infection, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) associates with MUC1 and phosphorylates the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail. This phosphorylation induces interaction between MUC1 and TLR5 (33). In another study, it was shown that the immunosuppressive effect of MUC1 on TLR5 in bronchial epithelial cells is mediated by prevention of recruitment of MyD88 to TLR5 and inhibition of downstream signaling (34). A recent study reported that the extracellular domain of MUC1 can act as a releasable decoy molecule during P. aeruginosa infection, thereby restricting pathogen adherence to the epithelial surface (35).

H. influenzae is another important bacterial pathogen which can cause severe pneumonia and meningitis and other invasive infections such as septicemia, which particularly affects young children. During infection with nontypeable H. influenzae, bacterial lysates induce inflammation mainly through the activation of TLR2. Subsequently, TLR2 activation leads to production of TNF-α, which upregulates MUC1 through the activation of TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1), which in turn suppresses TLR2 signaling (36). MUC1 also inhibits signaling of other TLRs, including TLR2, TLR4, TLR7, and TLR9, during infection with respiratory syncytial virus (37). While TLR2 and TLR4 are localized at the plasma membrane where MUC1 is expressed also, TLR7 and TLR9 are located in the endosomal compartment. Which mechanisms explain the immunoregulatory effects of MUC1 on these different types of TLRs? First, the TLR extracellular domain could be shielded by the glycosylated extracellular domain of MUC1, which could subsequently reduce TLR-ligand interactions. Second, ligand binding and recognition could be hampered by the formation of a MUC1-TLR receptor complex, preventing direct interaction of pathogens with the epithelial cell surface. Third, the binding of MyD88 to the TLR intracellular tail could be impeded due to the direct interaction between MUC1 and TLR. Fourth, the cytoplasmic tail of MUC1 could act downstream by interacting with components of the NF-κB pathway and thereby modulate immune activation as was previously described for the role of MUC1 during Helicobacter pylori infection in the stomach (15).

S. aureus frequently colonizes the oral cavity and can cause respiratory disease in hospitalized patients and the elderly. One publication demonstrated that S. aureus associated with the secreted antimicrobial salivary mucin MUC7 during oral colonization (38). A recent study demonstrated strong binding affinity of a S. aureus surface adhesin regulated by the transcription factor MgrA to mucus in pig trachea. The surface adhesin and specific mucin glycoprotein involved in this interaction are yet to be characterized (39).

In addition to expression on epithelial cells, MUC1 is also expressed by immune cells, including macrophages. A recent study demonstrated that MUC1 facilitates phagocytosis of S. pneumoniae by macrophages and thereby limits bacterial infection. However, effects of MUC1 on phagocytosis seem to be highly bacterium specific. While mouse Muc1 knockout macrophages exhibited a reduced capacity to phagocytose S. pneumoniae, phagocytosis of P. aeruginosa was increased compared to the level seen with wild-type macrophages (40). In addition to acting on phagocytosis at the plasma membrane, MUC1 is also an important suppressor of activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Stimulation of MUC1-deficient macrophages with either H. influenzae or S. aureus, either of which can activate NLRP3, resulted in elevated levels of proinflammatory IL-1β in comparison to wild-type macrophages (41). Overall, the existing data indicate that MUC1 plays an important anti-inflammatory role during infection with different bacterial pathogens at the respiratory mucosa.

In contrast to MUC1, information regarding the role of other transmembrane mucins (MUC4 and MUC16) in respiratory infections is still fragmentary. The role of these transmembrane mucins during airway infection needs to be addressed thoroughly to understand mucin-specific functions.

ROLE OF MUCINS AND MUCIN GLYCANS DURING INFLUENZA VIRUS INFECTIONS

Influenza A virus (IAV) is a highly infectious respiratory pathogen that is a constant threat to the human population. IAVs are negative-sense, single-stranded, segmented RNA viruses and belong to the family Orthomyxoviridae. IAV can be categorized into subtypes based on the two surface proteins of the viral envelope: hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) (42). Similarly to bacterial pathogens, IAV enters the respiratory tract through the nasal cavity and needs to traverse the soluble mucus layer and apical transmembrane mucins to be able to infect the underlying epithelial cells. Therefore, interactions with mucins and mucin glycans are essential steps in IAV pathogenesis. The protective role of mucins during IAV infection was demonstrated by overexpression of the soluble mucin Muc5ac in mice, which protected against viral infection (24, 43). This result is in line with the observation that upregulation of MUC5AC is part of the normal mucosal response during respiratory infections. A recent study showed increased morbidity and mortality in Muc1 knockout mice infected with IAV compared to wild-type mice. Sialylated Muc1 directly interacted with viral particles and prevented IAV entry into respiratory epithelial cells. In addition, enhanced inflammatory responses were observed in Muc1 knockout mice, which is in line with the anti-inflammatory effect of MUC1 during bacterial infection. McAuley et al. hypothesize that the anti-inflammatory activity of MUC1 could be mediated by the interaction of IAV with the extracellular domain of MUC1, release of the MUC1 extracellular domain, and shedding of the mucin-virus particle into the lumen (14).

Mucins of ciliated cells of the human upper respiratory tract primarily contain sialic acids that are bound to galactose by an α2,6 linkage, while α2,3-linked sialic acid predominates in the human lower respiratory tract on the bronchiolar nonciliated cuboidal cells and alveolar type II pneumocytes (44). In contrast, α2,3-linked sialic acids predominate on mucins in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts of avian hosts. Structural differences in sialic acid linkages play an important role in host restriction of the influenza virus. The human influenza viruses preferentially bind sialic acids with α2,6 linkages on extended glycans, while influenza viruses of avian and equine origin bind better to sialic acids with α2,3 linkages. The relative scarcity of α2,3-linked sialic acids in the upper respiratory tract of humans is thought to represent host restriction with respect to avian influenza viruses. The swine respiratory tract has been shown to express both α2,3-linked and α2,6-linked sialic acids, and for this reason, swine have been referred to as “mixing vessels” that foster reassortment of influenza viruses and increase the risk of zoonotic infections (45). Differential expression and activity of glycosyltransferases could lead to attachment of different sialic acid structures to mucins, but differences between species have not been characterized in detail.

PATHOGENESIS OF RESPIRATORY CORONAVIRUSES

Coronaviruses are large, positive-sense enveloped RNA viruses in the Nidovirales order and are divided into four genera: α (e.g., human CoV-NL63 [HCoV-NL63] and HCoV-229E), β (e.g., HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1), γ, and δ. Several zoonotic β coronaviruses have caused several outbreaks of deadly pneumonia in humans since the beginning of the 21st century. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) outbreak in 2002 was responsible for an epidemic with a fatality rate of 10% that spread to five continents. The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) emerged in the Arabian Peninsula in 2012 and has caused recurrent outbreaks in humans, with a fatality rate of 35%. The deadly coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by a novel coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 started in late 2019. Coronaviruses infect cells by receptor-mediated entry using the envelope-anchored spike (S) protein that induces fusion of viral and host membranes. SARS-CoV and HCoV-NL63 use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as an entry receptor, whereas dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) is recognized by the spike protein of MERS-CoV (46). One important feature of human coronaviruses is that, in addition to these entry receptors, they depend on sialic-acid-containing glycoproteins and gangliosides as primary attachment sites in the respiratory tract (47). In contrast, other coronaviruses such as HCoV-NL63, HCoV-229E, and porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCoV) seem to lack sialic acid binding activity (48, 49).

Coronaviruses of low pathogenicity such as HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, bovine coronavirus (BCoV), and porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus (PHEV) interact with 9-O-acetyl-sialic acid (9-O-Ac-Sia), a terminal residue corresponding to glycan chains on glycoproteins and lipids (50). Glycan array analysis revealed that MERS-CoV prefers to bind sulfated sialyl-LewisX with α2,3-linked sialic acid and, to a lesser extent, with α2,6-linked sialic acid. To further confirm the binding, lectin histochemistry analysis was performed in the upper and lower respiratory tissues of humans as well as of dromedary camels, the natural reservoir of MERS-CoV. The results demonstrated that α2,3-linked sialic acid is abundant in the camel nasal respiratory epithelium and the alveoli of the human lung. This specificity correlates with the predominant sites of MERS-CoV colonization in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of camels and humans, respectively (51). The study also provided evidence that neuraminidase treatment for removal of cell surface sialic acids inhibited MERS-CoV entry of Calu-3 human airway cells (52). This result suggests that interaction with surface sialic acids is essential for viral entry and indicates that sialic acids on soluble mucins could play a role in preventing MERS-CoV infection. Interestingly, the specific sialic acid binding site is present in MERS-CoV but in not found in SARS-CoV, which could possibly represent an important difference between the two viruses. However, an in silico study analyzed the interaction between the spike protein and its membrane receptors and, based on a quantitative characterization of surface regions of MERS-CoV spike and sialic acid molecules, the authors proposed that sialic acids may act as additional receptors of SARS-CoV-2 (53).

The roles of specific soluble and transmembrane mucins in coronavirus infection have not yet been studied in detail, but a study was recently deposited in bioRxiv that demonstrated that female Muc4 knockout mice lost more weight than male Muc4 knockout mice after infection with SARS-CoV and displayed increased disease severity (54). Muc4 knockout mice had viral titers similar to those of wild-type (WT) mice but enhanced inflammatory cytokine responses. In addition, female Muc4 knockout mice performed significantly more poorly than WT mice in pulmonary function measurements, including airway resistance and expiratory flow measurements. The results of that study suggest that the transmembrane mucin Muc4 plays an important protective role in female mice during coronavirus pathogenesis. The importance of Muc4 was also determined during pathology of the mosquito-borne Chikungunya virus, possibly indicating a broader importance of Muc4 during viral infection (54). Extensive research is needed to understand the role of transmembrane mucins and their glycans in coronavirus disease mechanisms.

MUCOSAL DEFENSE AGAINST SARS-CoV-2

There is pressing urgency to understand the pathogenesis of COVID-19, which is mostly characterized by pneumonia, fever, cough, and occasional diarrhea. SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein binds ACE2 and, in concert with host proteases, principally TMPRSS2, promotes cellular entry (55). The clinical stages of COVID-19 can be divided into three phases based on the cells that are likely infected: (i) the asymptomatic state (the initial 1 to 2 days of infection); (ii) the upper airway and conducting airway response (the next few days); and (iii) hypoxia, ground glass opacity, and progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (56). In stage 1, inhaled SARS-CoV-2 likely traverses the nasal mucus layer, invades nasal epithelial cells, and starts replicating. A recent single-cell RNA sequencing study generated by the Human Cell Atlas consortium reported the highest level of expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the nasal goblet and ciliated cells in healthy individuals (57). Single-cell transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) data analysis also revealed that the cluster of cells with ACE2 expression also expressed MUC1 (58) and the soluble mucin MUC5AC (59). These cells represent the most likely initial infection route for the virus, and nasal carriage is likely to be a key feature of transmission. The pore of the mucin gel is sufficiently large (approximately 500 nm) to ensure that it is readily penetrated by viruses which are generally 30 to 200 nm in diameter (4, 60). After initial replication, the virus propagates and migrates down the respiratory tract along the conducting airways, and a more robust infection is triggered. After acute infection, there may be less mucus production in the glands due to damage of glandular epithelial cells, leading to decreased mucus production and subsequent impaired mucociliary clearance. Subsequently, there are fewer droplets and virus particles and lower levels of other material cleared from the lungs, making the lungs more prone to infection (61). It is currently not known if and how SARS-CoV-2 interacts with human respiratory mucin and mucin glycans. However, a recent study indicated the presence of elevated levels of secreted MUC1 and MUC5AC in the sputum aspirated from the trachea of COVID-19 patients (62). COVID-19 patients also have a lower allelic frequency of the MUC5B genetic variant rs35705950 than healthy controls, which is associated with a higher level of expression of MUC5B, suggesting a protective role for MUC5B (63). The role of soluble and transmembrane mucins and their glycans during COVID-19 pathogenicity needs to be addressed to fully understand the course of the disease (Fig. 1C and D).

IMPACT OF GENDER AND AGE ON MUCIN EXPRESSION—IMPLICATIONS FOR COVID-19

The elderly are at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections that result in severe complications, with mortality higher in males than in females (64). Could it be that the gender and age differences that occur during respiratory diseases can be traced back to differences in mucin expression and glycosylation? In the final paragraph, we discuss changes to mucin expression, glycosylation, and lung function that relate to age and sex.

During cystic fibrosis, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), female patients generally have more-severe symptoms, poorer quality of life, and worse prognoses than male patients (65). Interestingly, it was previously demonstrated that expression and glycosylation of MUC5B and MUC5AC are regulated by the female sex hormone estradiol. In the human airways, the presence of estradiol increases the number of goblet cells, boosts expression of MUC5AC, and increases levels of expression of fucosyltransferases FUT4, FUT5, and FUT6 and total fucose residues (66). Due to the increased hydrophobicity of fucose residues, this increased fucosylation may negatively impact disease development in women suffering from chronic airway diseases (67). Estrogens also upregulate antibody sialylation, which yields an anti-inflammatory effect that is lost after menopause (68). Those authors speculate that reduction of sialylation of defensive respiratory mucus could contribute to the higher incidence of severe SARS-Cov-2 infections in men and elderly women (69). It has also been reported that interaction of 17β-estradiol with estrogen receptor alpha (ER-α) upregulates MUC5B gene expression through activation of the ERK-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (70). As mentioned above, female but not male Muc4 knockout mice display increased disease severity after infection with SARS-CoV, suggesting that the Muc4 transmembrane mucin plays an important protective role in female mice during coronavirus pathogenesis (53). Furthermore, epidemiological data from both SARS-CoV infection and SARS-CoV-2 infection indicate more-severe disease in male mice, with the female mice acquiring their resistance at least in part from estrogen signaling, which in turn upregulates mucin gene expression (54, 71). Future studies into the expression of ACE2 in different tissues and its regulation by 17β-estradiol will help us understand the mechanisms that underlie these epidemiological findings (72, 73).

Due to aging of the human population, there is an increased incidence in pulmonary infections, associated with significant morbidity and mortality (74). The frequent occurrence of respiratory infections in the elderly could also be explained in terms of mucin. Decreased mucus production is a characteristic of aged lungs which can lead to weakened pathogen removal and increased susceptibility to respiratory infection and disease progression (75). Aging is also associated with lower mucociliary clearance due to changes in mucus property and a lower tracheal mucus velocity (76). Interestingly, old mice have a decrease in Muc5b mucin production and as a result a reduction in mucociliary clearance in comparison to young mice (77). On the basis of the studies cited here, the higher susceptibility of elderly individuals to SARS-CoV-2 may in part be explained by decreased mucus production and impaired MCC allowing the virus to descend to the alveoli more readily in aged individuals. Furthermore, it was recently demonstrated that lower sialic acid content of the respiratory mucosa associated with aging leads to more-favorable conditions for initiation of viral infections (69). These findings make the research area of age-related and gender-related changes to respiratory mucins and mucin glycans an important field for future studies.

CONCLUSION

The mucosal barrier is the body’s first line of defense in fighting infection, and it offers protection from noxious pathogens. Mucins, the major structural components of mucus, are complex glycoproteins. In addition to acting as a physical barrier, they are key players in cell signaling, inflammation, and carcinogenesis. Understanding specific interactions of bacterial and viral pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, with respiratory mucins could aid in the development of tailor-made drugs that block these interactions and prevent pathogen invasion. Another promising strategy could be to upregulate mucin expression or alter glycosylation in order to boost mucosal defense mechanisms and prevent respiratory infections.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Soledad Cook-Ordonez for creating the illustrations of Fig. 1. We thank Frank van Kuppeveld and Berend Jan Bosch for critically reading the manuscript.

M.C. is supported by One Health funding provided by Utrecht University. K.S. is supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ERC-2019-STG-852452).

We declare no conflict of interest.

  • Copyright © 2020 Chatterjee et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hiemstra PS,
    2. McCray PB,
    3. Bals R
    . 2015. The innate immune function of airway epithelial cells in inflammatory lung disease. Eur Respir J 45:1150–1162. doi:10.1183/09031936.00141514.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fernández-Blanco JA,
    2. Fakih D,
    3. Arike L,
    4. Rodríguez-Piñeiro AM,
    5. Martínez-Abad B,
    6. Skansebo E,
    7. Jackson S,
    8. Root J,
    9. Singh D,
    10. McCrae C,
    11. Evans CM,
    12. Åstrand A,
    13. Ermund A,
    14. Hansson GC
    . 2018. Attached stratified mucus separates bacteria from the epithelial cells in COPD lungs. JCI Insight 3:e120994. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.120994.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Janssen WJ,
    2. Stefanski AL,
    3. Bochner BS,
    4. Evans CM
    . 2016. Control of lung defence by mucins and macrophages: ancient defence mechanisms with modern functions. Eur Respir J 48:1201–1214. doi:10.1183/13993003.00120-2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cone RA
    . 2009. Barrier properties of mucus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:75–85. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lillehoj EP,
    2. Kato K,
    3. Lu W,
    4. Kim KC
    . 2013. Cellular and molecular biology of airway mucins. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 303:139–202. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407697-6.00004-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Rogers DF
    . 2008. Airway mucus hypersecretion in asthma and COPD: not the same?, p 211–223. In Barnes P, Drazen J, Rennard S, Thomson N (ed), Asthma and COPD: basic mechanisms and clinical management, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Inc, San Diego, CA.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bennett EP,
    2. Mandel U,
    3. Clausen H,
    4. Gerken TA,
    5. Fritz TA,
    6. Tabak LA
    . 2012. Control of mucin-type O-glycosylation: a classification of the polypeptide GalNAc-transferase gene family. Glycobiology 22:736–756. doi:10.1093/glycob/cwr182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Trillo-Muyo S,
    2. Nilsson HE,
    3. Recktenwald CV,
    4. Ermund A,
    5. Ridley C,
    6. Meiss LN,
    7. Bähr A,
    8. Klymiuk N,
    9. Wine JJ,
    10. Koeck PJB,
    11. Thornton DJ,
    12. Hebert H,
    13. Hansson GC
    . 2018. Granule-stored MUC5B mucins are packed by the noncovalent formation of N-terminal head-to-head tetramers. J Biol Chem 293:5746–5754. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA117.001014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Denneny E,
    2. Sahota J,
    3. Beatson R,
    4. Thornton D,
    5. Burchell J,
    6. Porter J
    . 2020. Mucins and their receptors in chronic lung disease. Clin Transl Immunol 9:e01120. doi:10.1002/cti2.1120.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hattrup CL,
    2. Gendler SJ
    . 2008. Structure and function of the cell surface (tethered) mucins. Annu Rev Physiol 70:431–457. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.100659.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Van Putten JPM,
    2. Strijbis K
    . 2017. Transmembrane mucins: signaling receptors at the intersection of inflammation and cancer. J Innate Immun 9:281–299. doi:10.1159/000453594.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ridley C,
    2. Thornton DJ
    . 2018. Mucins: the frontline defence of the lung. Biochem Soc Trans 46:1099–1106. doi:10.1042/BST20170402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Dohrman A,
    2. Miyata S,
    3. Gallup M,
    4. Li JD,
    5. Chapelin C,
    6. Coste A,
    7. Escudier E,
    8. Nadel J,
    9. Basbaum C
    . 1998. Mucin gene (MUC 2 and MUC 5AC) upregulation by Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1406:251–259. doi:10.1016/S0925-4439(98)00010-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. McAuley JL,
    2. Corcilius L,
    3. Tan HX,
    4. Payne RJ,
    5. McGuckin MA,
    6. Brown LE
    . 2017. The cell surface mucin MUC1 limits the severity of influenza A virus infection. Mucosal Immunol 10:1581–1593. doi:10.1038/mi.2017.16.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lindén SK,
    2. Sheng YH,
    3. Every AL,
    4. Miles KM,
    5. Skoog EC,
    6. Florin THJ,
    7. Sutton P,
    8. McGuckin MA
    . 2009. MUC1 limits Helicobacter pylori infection both by steric hindrance and by acting as a releasable decoy. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000617. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Nath S,
    2. Mukherjee P
    . 2014. MUC1: a multifaceted oncoprotein with a key role in cancer progression. Trends Mol Med 20:332–342. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2014.02.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Nunes DP,
    4. Troxler RF,
    5. Offner GD
    . 2003. Pro-inflammatory cytokines up-regulate MUC1 gene expression in oral epithelial cells. J Dent Res 82:883–887. doi:10.1177/154405910308201107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Niv Y,
    2. Boltin D
    . 2012. Secreted and membrane-bound mucins and idiopathic peptic ulcer disease. Digestion 86:258–263. doi:10.1159/000341423.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fischer BM,
    2. Cuellar JG,
    3. Diehl ML,
    4. DeFreytas AM,
    5. Zhang J,
    6. Carraway KL,
    7. Voynow JA
    . 2003. Neutrophil elastase increases MUC4 expression in normal human bronchial epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 284:L671–L679. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00220.2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Linden SK,
    2. Sutton P,
    3. Karlsson NG,
    4. Korolik V,
    5. McGuckin MA
    . 2008. Mucins in the mucosal barrier to infection. Mucosal Immunol 1:183–197. doi:10.1038/mi.2008.5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Taherali F,
    2. Varum F,
    3. Basit AW
    . 2018. A slippery slope: on the origin, role and physiology of mucus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 124:16–33. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.10.014.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Aristoteli LP,
    2. Willcox MDP
    . 2003. Mucin degradation mechanisms by distinct Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in vitro. Infect Immun 71:5565–5575. doi:10.1128/iai.71.10.5565-5575.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ganesan S,
    2. Comstock AT,
    3. Sajjan US
    . 2013. Barrier function of airway tract epithelium. Tissue Barriers 1:e24997. doi:10.4161/tisb.24997.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Roy MG,
    2. Livraghi-Butrico A,
    3. Fletcher AA,
    4. McElwee MM,
    5. Evans SE,
    6. Boerner RM,
    7. Alexander SN,
    8. Bellinghausen LK,
    9. Song AS,
    10. Petrova YM,
    11. Tuvim MJ,
    12. Adachi R,
    13. Romo I,
    14. Bordt AS,
    15. Bowden MG,
    16. Sisson JH,
    17. Woodruff PG,
    18. Thornton DJ,
    19. Rousseau K,
    20. De la Garza MM,
    21. Moghaddam SJ,
    22. Karmouty-Quintana H,
    23. Blackburn MR,
    24. Drouin SM,
    25. Davis CW,
    26. Terrell KA,
    27. Grubb BR,
    28. O'Neal WK,
    29. Flores SC,
    30. Cota-Gomez A,
    31. Lozupone CA,
    32. Donnelly JM,
    33. Watson AM,
    34. Hennessy CE,
    35. Keith RC,
    36. Yang IV,
    37. Barthel L,
    38. Henson PM,
    39. Janssen WJ,
    40. Schwartz DA,
    41. Boucher RC,
    42. Dickey BF,
    43. Evans CM
    . 2014. Muc5b is required for airway defence. Nature 505:412–416. doi:10.1038/nature12807.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ha U,
    2. Lim JH,
    3. Jono H,
    4. Koga T,
    5. Srivastava A,
    6. Malley R,
    7. Pagès G,
    8. Pouysségur J,
    9. Li J-D
    . 2007. A novel role for IκB kinase (IKK) α and IKKβ in ERK-dependent up-regulation of MUC5AC mucin transcription by Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Immunol 178:1736–1747. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.178.3.1736.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ryan PA,
    2. Pancholi V,
    3. Fischetti VA
    . 2001. Group A streptococci bind to mucin and human pharyngeal cells through sialic acid-containing receptors. Infect Immun 69:7402–7412. doi:10.1128/IAI.69.12.7402-7412.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Vishwanath S,
    2. Ramphal R
    . 1985. Tracheobronchial mucin receptor for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: predominance of amino sugars in binding sites. Infect Immun 48:331–335. doi:10.1128/IAI.48.2.331-335.1985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Reddy MS,
    2. Bernstein JM,
    3. Murphy TF,
    4. Faden HS
    . 1996. Binding between outer membrane proteins of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and human nasopharyngeal mucin. Infect Immun 64:1477–1479. doi:10.1128/IAI.64.4.1477-1479.1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Jeffries JL,
    2. Jia J,
    3. Choi W,
    4. Choe S,
    5. Miao J,
    6. Xu Y,
    7. Powell R,
    8. Lin J,
    9. Kuang Z,
    10. Gaskins HR,
    11. Lau GW
    . 2016. Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyocyanin modulates mucin glycosylation with sialyl-Lewis x to increase binding to airway epithelial cells. Mucosal Immunol 9:1039–1050. doi:10.1038/mi.2015.119.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. Barthelson R,
    2. Mobasseri A,
    3. Zopf D,
    4. Simon P
    . 1998. Adherence of Streptococcus pneumoniae to respiratory epithelial cells is inhibited by sialylated oligosaccharides. Infect Immun 66:1439–1444. doi:10.1128/IAI.66.4.1439-1444.1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. St Geme JW
    . 1994. The HMW1 adhesin of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae recognizes sialylated glycoprotein receptors on cultured human epithelial cells. Infect Immun 62:3881–3889.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Umehara T,
    2. Kato K,
    3. Park YS,
    4. Lillehoj EP,
    5. Kawauchi H,
    6. Kim KC
    . 2012. Prevention of lung injury by Muc1 mucin in a mouse model of repetitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Inflamm Res 61:1013–1020. doi:10.1007/s00011-012-0494-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Kato K,
    2. Lillehoj EP,
    3. Kim KC
    . 2016. Pseudomonas aeruginosa stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of and TLR5 association with the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail through EGFR activation. Inflamm Res 65:225–233. doi:10.1007/s00011-015-0908-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kato K,
    2. Lillehoj EP,
    3. Park YS,
    4. Umehara T,
    5. Hoffman NE,
    6. Madesh M,
    7. Kim KC
    . 2012. Membrane-tethered MUC1 mucin is phosphorylated by epidermal growth factor receptor in airway epithelial cells and associates with TLR5 to inhibit recruitment of MyD88. J Immunol 188:2014–2022. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1102405.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lillehoj EP,
    2. Guang W,
    3. Hyun SW,
    4. Liu A,
    5. Hegerle N,
    6. Simon R,
    7. Cross AS,
    8. Ishida H,
    9. Luzina IG,
    10. Atamas SP,
    11. Goldblum SE
    . 2019. Neuraminidase 1–mediated desialylation of the mucin 1 ectodomain releases a decoy receptor that protects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection. J Biol Chem 294:662–678. doi:10.1074/jbc.RA118.006022.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Kyo Y,
    2. Kato K,
    3. Park YS,
    4. Gajghate S,
    5. Gajhate S,
    6. Umehara T,
    7. Lillehoj EP,
    8. Suzaki H,
    9. Kim KC
    . 2012. Antiinflammatory role of MUC1 mucin during infection with nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 46:149–156. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2011-0142OC.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Dinwiddie DL,
    3. Harrod KS,
    4. Jiang Y,
    5. Kim KC
    . 2010. Anti-inflammatory effect of MUC1 during respiratory syncytial virus infection of lung epithelial cells in vitro. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 298:L558–L563. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00225.2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Heo SM,
    2. Choi KS,
    3. Kazim LA,
    4. Reddy MS,
    5. Haase EM,
    6. Scannapieco FA,
    7. Ruhl S
    . 2013. Host defense proteins derived from human saliva bind to Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 81:1364–1373. doi:10.1128/IAI.00825-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Parker CP,
    2. Akil N,
    3. Shanrock CR,
    4. Allen PD,
    5. Chaly AL,
    6. Crosby H,
    7. Kwiecinski J,
    8. Horswill AR,
    9. Fischer AJ
    . 2020. MgrA regulates interaction of Staphylococcus aureus with mucin. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/2020.04.09.035261.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Dhar P,
    2. Ng GZ,
    3. Dunne EM,
    4. Sutton P
    . 2017. Mucin 1 protects against severe Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Virulence 8:1631–1642. doi:10.1080/21505594.2017.1341021.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Dhar P,
    2. McAuley J
    . 2019. The role of the cell surface mucin MUC1 as a barrier to infection and regulator of inflammation. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:117. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00117.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    1. Taubenberger JK,
    2. Morens DM
    . 2013. Influenza viruses: breaking all the rules. mBio 4:e00365-13. doi:10.1128/mBio.00365-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Ehre C,
    2. Worthington EN,
    3. Liesman RM,
    4. Grubb BR,
    5. Barbier D,
    6. O'Neal WK,
    7. Sallenave J-M,
    8. Pickles RJ,
    9. Boucher RC
    . 2012. Overexpressing mouse model demonstrates the protective role of Muc5ac in the lungs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:16528–16533. doi:10.1073/pnas.1206552109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Richard M,
    2. van den Brand JMA,
    3. Bestebroer TM,
    4. Lexmond P,
    5. de Meulder D,
    6. Fouchier RAM,
    7. Lowen AC,
    8. Herfst S
    . 2020. Influenza A viruses are transmitted via the air from the nasal respiratory epithelium of ferrets. Nat Commun 11:766. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14626-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Zanin M,
    2. Baviskar P,
    3. Webster R,
    4. Webby R
    . 2016. The interaction between respiratory pathogens and mucus. Cell Host Microbe 19:159–168. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2016.01.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Li F
    . 2015. Receptor recognition mechanisms of coronaviruses: a decade of structural studies. J Virol 89:1954–1964. doi:10.1128/JVI.02615-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Fantini J,
    2. Di Scala C,
    3. Chahinian H,
    4. Yahi N
    . 2020. Structural and molecular modelling studies reveal a new mechanism of action of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Int J Antimicrob Agents 55:105960. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105960.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Tomlinson ACA,
    3. Wong AHM,
    4. Zhou D,
    5. Desforges M,
    6. Talbot PJ,
    7. Benlekbir S,
    8. Rubinstein JL,
    9. Rini JM
    . 2019. The human coronavirus HCoV-229E S-protein structure and receptor binding. Elife 8:e51230. doi:10.7554/eLife.51230.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Matrosovich M,
    2. Herrler G,
    3. Klenk HD
    . 2015. Sialic acid receptors of viruses. Top Curr Chem 367:1–28. doi:10.1007/128_2013_466.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Alejandra Tortorici M,
    2. Walls AC,
    3. Lang Y,
    4. Wang C,
    5. Li Z,
    6. Koerhuis D,
    7. Boons GJ,
    8. Bosch BJ,
    9. Rey FA,
    10. de Groot RJ,
    11. Veesler D
    . 2019. Structural basis for human coronavirus attachment to sialic acid receptors. Nat Struct Mol Biol 26:481–489. doi:10.1038/s41594-019-0233-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Widagdo W,
    2. Okba NMA,
    3. Li W,
    4. Jong AD,
    5. Swart RLD,
    6. Begeman L,
    7. Van den Brand JMA,
    8. Bosch BJ,
    9. Haagmans BL
    . 2019. Species-specific colocalization of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus attachment and entry receptors. J Virol 93:e00107-19. doi:10.1128/JVI.00107-19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Hulswit RJG,
    3. Widjaja I,
    4. Raj VS,
    5. McBride R,
    6. Peng W,
    7. Widagdo W,
    8. Tortorici MA,
    9. Van Dieren B,
    10. Lang Y,
    11. Van Lent JWM,
    12. Paulson JC,
    13. De Haan CAM,
    14. De Groot RJ,
    15. Van Kuppeveld FJM,
    16. Haagmans BL,
    17. Bosch BJ
    . 2017. Identification of sialic acid-binding function for the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike glycoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E8508–E8517. doi:10.1073/pnas.1712592114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Milanetti E,
    2. Miotto M,
    3. Rienzo LD,
    4. Monti M,
    5. Gosti G,
    6. Ruocco G
    . 2020. In-silico evidence for two receptors based strategy of SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/2020.03.24.006197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Plante JA,
    2. Plante K,
    3. Gralinski L,
    4. Beall A,
    5. Ferris MT,
    6. Bottomly D,
    7. Green RR,
    8. McWeeney S,
    9. Heise MT,
    10. Baric RS,
    11. Menachery VD
    . 2020. Mucin 4 protects female mice from coronavirus pathogenesis. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/2020.02.19.957118.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.↵
    1. Hoffmann M,
    2. Kleine-Weber H,
    3. Schroeder S,
    4. Krüger N,
    5. Herrler T,
    6. Erichsen S,
    7. Schiergens TS,
    8. Herrler G,
    9. Wu NH,
    10. Nitsche A,
    11. Müller MA,
    12. Drosten C,
    13. Pöhlmann S
    . 2020. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181:271–280.e8. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Mason RJ
    . 2020. Pathogenesis of COVID-19 from a cell biology perspective. Eur Respir J 55:2000607. doi:10.1183/13993003.00607-2020.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Sungnak W,
    2. Huang N,
    3. Bécavin C,
    4. Berg M,
    5. Queen R,
    6. Litvinukova M,
    7. Talavera-López C,
    8. Maatz H,
    9. Reichart D,
    10. Sampaziotis F,
    11. Worlock KB,
    12. Yoshida M,
    13. Barnes JL,
    14. Banovich NE,
    15. Barbry P,
    16. Brazma A,
    17. Collin J,
    18. Desai TJ,
    19. Duong TE,
    20. Eickelberg O,
    21. Falk C,
    22. Farzan M,
    23. Glass I,
    24. Gupta RK,
    25. Haniffa M,
    26. Horvath P,
    27. Hubner N,
    28. Hung D,
    29. Kaminski N,
    30. Krasnow M,
    31. Kropski JA,
    32. Kuhnemund M,
    33. Lako M,
    34. Lee H,
    35. Leroy S,
    36. Linnarson S,
    37. Lundeberg J,
    38. Meyer KB,
    39. Miao Z,
    40. Misharin AV,
    41. Nawijn MC,
    42. Nikolic MZ,
    43. Noseda M,
    44. Ordovas-Montanes J,
    45. Oudit GY,
    46. Pe’er D,
    47. Powell J,
    48. Quake S,
    49. Rajagopal J,
    50. Tata PR, et al
    . 2020. SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat Med 26:681–687.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Zou X,
    2. Chen K,
    3. Zou J,
    4. Han P,
    5. Hao J,
    6. Han Z
    . 2020. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front Med 14:185–192. doi:10.1007/s11684-020-0754-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. 59.↵
    1. Smith JC,
    2. Sheltzer JM
    . 2020. Cigarette smoke triggers the expansion of a subpopulation of respiratory epithelial cells that express the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/2020.03.28.013672.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. 60.↵
    1. Johnson DC
    . 2011. Airway mucus function and dysfunction. (Letter.) N Engl J Med 363:978. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1014719.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. 61.↵
    1. Quinton PM
    . 1979. Composition and control of secretions from tracheal bronchial submucosal glands. Nature 279:551–552. doi:10.1038/279551a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    1. Lu W,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Wang T
    . 20 August 2020, posting date. Elevated MUC1 and MUC5AC mucin protein levels in airway mucus of critical ill COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol doi:10.1002/jmv.26406.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    1. van Moorsel CH,
    2. van der Vis JJ,
    3. Benschop C,
    4. Ruven HJ,
    5. Quanjel M,
    6. Grutters JC
    . 2020. The MUC5B promotor polymorphism associates with severe Covid-19. medRxiv doi:10.1101/2020.05.12.20099333.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. 64.↵
    1. Garg S,
    2. Kim L,
    3. Whitaker M,
    4. O'Halloran A,
    5. Cummings C,
    6. Holstein R,
    7. Prill M,
    8. Chai SJ,
    9. Kirley PD,
    10. Alden NB,
    11. Kawasaki B,
    12. Yousey-Hindes K,
    13. Niccolai L,
    14. Anderson EJ,
    15. Openo KP,
    16. Weigel A,
    17. Monroe ML,
    18. Ryan P,
    19. Henderson J,
    20. Kim S,
    21. Como-Sabetti K,
    22. Lynfield R,
    23. Sosin D,
    24. Torres S,
    25. Muse A,
    26. Bennett NM,
    27. Billing L,
    28. Sutton M,
    29. West N,
    30. Schaffner W,
    31. Talbot HK,
    32. Aquino C,
    33. George A,
    34. Budd A,
    35. Brammer L,
    36. Langley G,
    37. Hall AJ,
    38. Fry A
    . 2020. Hospitalization rates and characteristics of patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 — Covid-net, 14 states, March 1–30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:458–464. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.↵
    1. Harness-Brumley CL,
    2. Elliott AC,
    3. Rosenbluth DB,
    4. Raghavan D,
    5. Jain R
    . 2014. Gender differences in outcomes of patients with cystic fibrosis. J Women’s Heal 23:1012–1020. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    1. Tam A,
    2. Wadsworth S,
    3. Dorscheid D,
    4. Man SFP,
    5. Sin DD
    . 2014. Estradiol increases mucus synthesis in bronchial epithelial cells. PLoS One 9:e100633. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100633.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. 67.↵
    1. Fujii H,
    2. Shinzaki S,
    3. Iijima H,
    4. Wakamatsu K,
    5. Iwamoto C,
    6. Sobajima T,
    7. Kuwahara R,
    8. Hiyama S,
    9. Hayashi Y,
    10. Takamatsu S,
    11. Uozumi N,
    12. Kamada Y,
    13. Tsujii M,
    14. Taniguchi N,
    15. Takehara T,
    16. Miyoshi E
    . 2016. Core fucosylation on T cells, required for activation of T-cell receptor signaling and induction of colitis in mice, is increased in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 150:1620–1632. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Chen G,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Qiu L,
    4. Qin X,
    5. Liu H,
    6. Wang X,
    7. Wang Y,
    8. Song G,
    9. Li F,
    10. Guo Y,
    11. Li F,
    12. Guo S,
    13. Li Z
    . 2012. Human IgG Fc-glycosylation profiling reveals associations with age, sex, female sex hormones and thyroid cancer. J Proteomics 75:2824–2834. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2012.02.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    1. Morniroli D,
    2. Giannì M,
    3. Consales A,
    4. Pietrasanta C,
    5. Mosca F
    . 2020. Human sialome and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: an understated correlation? Front Immunol 11:1480. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01480.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. 70.↵
    1. Choi HJ,
    2. Chung Y-S,
    3. Kim HJ,
    4. Moon UY,
    5. Choi YH,
    6. Van Seuningen I,
    7. Baek SJ,
    8. Yoon H-G,
    9. Yoon J-H
    . 2009. Signal pathway of 17β-estradiol-induced MUC5B expression in human airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 40:168–178. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2007-0377OC.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    1. Channappanavar R,
    2. Fett C,
    3. Mack M,
    4. Ten Eyck PP,
    5. Meyerholz DK,
    6. Perlman S
    . 2017. Sex-based differences in susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J Immunol 198:4046–4053. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1601896.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. 72.↵
    1. Stelzig KE,
    2. Canepa-Escaro F,
    3. Schiliro M,
    4. Berdnikovs S,
    5. Prakash YS,
    6. Chiarella SE
    . 2020. Estrogen regulates the expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in differentiated airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 318:L1280–L1281. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00153.2020.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. 73.↵
    1. La Vignera S,
    2. Cannarella R,
    3. Condorelli RA,
    4. Torre F,
    5. Aversa A,
    6. Calogero AE
    . 2020. Sex-specific SARS-CoV-2 mortality: among hormone-modulated ace2 expression, risk of venous thromboembolism and hypovitaminosis D. Int J Mol Sci 21:2948. doi:10.3390/ijms21082948.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  74. 74.↵
    1. Stupka JE,
    2. Mortensen EM,
    3. Anzueto A,
    4. Restrepo MI
    . 2009. Community-acquired pneumonia in elderly patients. Aging Health 5:763–774. doi:10.2217/ahe.09.74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    1. Cho SJ,
    2. Stout-Delgado HW
    . 2020. Aging and lung disease. Annu Rev Physiol 82:433–459. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034610.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. 76.↵
    1. Ho JC,
    2. Chan KN,
    3. Hu WH,
    4. Lam WK,
    5. Zheng L,
    6. Tipoe GL,
    7. Sun J,
    8. Leung R,
    9. Tsang KW
    . 2001. The effect of aging on nasal mucociliary clearance, beat frequency, and ultrastructure of respiratory cilia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:983–988. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.163.4.9909121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. 77.↵
    1. Grubb BR,
    2. Livraghi-Butrico A,
    3. Rogers TD,
    4. Yin W,
    5. Button B,
    6. Ostrowski LE
    . 2016. Reduced mucociliary clearance in old mice is associated with a decrease in muc5b mucin. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 310:L860–L867. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00015.2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Defensive Properties of Mucin Glycoproteins during Respiratory Infections—Relevance for SARS-CoV-2
Maitrayee Chatterjee, Jos P. M. van Putten, Karin Strijbis
mBio Nov 2020, 11 (6) e02374-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02374-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Defensive Properties of Mucin Glycoproteins during Respiratory Infections—Relevance for SARS-CoV-2
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Defensive Properties of Mucin Glycoproteins during Respiratory Infections—Relevance for SARS-CoV-2
Maitrayee Chatterjee, Jos P. M. van Putten, Karin Strijbis
mBio Nov 2020, 11 (6) e02374-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02374-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MUCUS: FIRST LINE OF DEFENSE IN THE RESPIRATORY TRACT
    • MUCINS, THE PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF MUCUS
    • SOLUBLE GEL-FORMING MUCINS OF THE RESPIRATORY TRACT
    • EPITHELIAL TRANSMEMBRANE MUCINS OF THE RESPIRATORY TRACT
    • CHANGES IN MUCIN EXPRESSION AND GLYCOSYLATION DURING INFLAMMATION
    • BACTERIAL INTERACTIONS WITH SOLUBLE MUCINS AND MUCIN GLYCANS
    • FUNCTIONS OF TRANSMEMBRANE MUCIN DURING RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS WITH BACTERIAL PATHOGENS
    • ROLE OF MUCINS AND MUCIN GLYCANS DURING INFLUENZA VIRUS INFECTIONS
    • PATHOGENESIS OF RESPIRATORY CORONAVIRUSES
    • MUCOSAL DEFENSE AGAINST SARS-CoV-2
    • IMPACT OF GENDER AND AGE ON MUCIN EXPRESSION—IMPLICATIONS FOR COVID-19
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

mucosal barrier
mucin
muc1
O-linked glycans
glycosylation
respiratory pathogens
mucin-microbe interactions
SARS-CoV-2

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511