Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

A Small-Molecule Modulator of Metal Homeostasis in Gram-Positive Pathogens

Lillian J. Juttukonda, William N. Beavers, Daisy Unsihuay, Kwangho Kim, Gleb Pishchany, Kyle J. Horning, Andy Weiss, Hassan Al-Tameemi, Jeffrey M. Boyd, Gary A. Sulikowski, Aaron B. Bowman, Eric P. Skaar
Paul Dunman, Editor
Lillian J. Juttukonda
aVanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
gDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William N. Beavers
aVanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
gDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daisy Unsihuay
aVanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
gDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kwangho Kim
bChemical Synthesis Core, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gleb Pishchany
cDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle J. Horning
dVanderbilt Brain Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andy Weiss
aVanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
gDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hassan Al-Tameemi
eDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey M. Boyd
eDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeffrey M. Boyd
Gary A. Sulikowski
aVanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
bChemical Synthesis Core, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
fDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron B. Bowman
dVanderbilt Brain Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric P. Skaar
aVanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
gDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Dunman
University of Rochester
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02555-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Identification of a small molecule that is antimicrobial to S. aureus. (A) Workflow for identifying compounds of interest. (B) Percent growth inhibition by treatment with the indicated concentrations of compound ‘921 relative to vehicle control for S. aureus Newman or ΔmntH/C strain. Data are mean ± standard deviation from duplicate measurements. Statistical significance was determined by t test where * = P < 0.05 and ** = P < 0.01. (C) Relative growth at 12 h with 5 μM ‘921 ± MnCl2 is graphed as % of growth without compound or MnCl2. Data are mean ± standard deviation from triplicate measurements acquired on two separate days and combined (n = 6). Statistical significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test comparing each concentration of Mn to no-Mn control where *** = P < 0.001. (D) CFU recovered at 2-h intervals from growth curve of S. aureus Newman treated with vehicle, 5 μM ‘921, or 5 μM ‘921 + 1 mM MnCl2 over time. Data are mean ± standard deviation from quadruplicate measurements. (E) CFU recovered following 24-h treatment of mid-exponential-phase S. aureus Newman cultures with the indicated combinations of vehicle, 1 mM MnCl2, 100 μM ‘921, and 1 mM EDTA. Data are mean ± standard deviation from triplicate measurements acquired on two separate days combined (n = 6). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple-comparison test comparing each concentration of Mn to no-Mn control where * = P < 0.05 and *** = P < 0.001. Experiments in panels F and G were performed in an anaerobic chamber. (F) Growth of S. aureus Newman in the presence of vehicle, 1 mM MnCl2, 5 μM ‘921, or 5 μM ‘921 + 1 mM MnCl2. Data are mean ± standard deviation for triplicate measurements. (G) CFU recovered following treatment of mid-exponential-phase cultures of S. aureus with vehicle, 1 mM or 100 μM MnCl2, 100 μM ‘921, or combinations of MnCl2 + ‘921 for 24 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation for triplicate measurements.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    VU0026921 induces a metal toxicity transcriptional response. RNA sequencing was performed on mid-exponential S. aureus Newman cultures exposed to vehicle, 1 mM MnCl2, 100 μM ‘921, or 100 μM ‘921 + 1 mM MnCl2 for 30 min. (A) Multidimensional scaling visualization of RNA sequencing biological replicates. The x and y axes are dimensionless units. The closeness of symbols to each other on the 2-dimensional plot represents the relatedness of the transcriptional profiles of the represented data sets. (B) Categories of genes whose transcription was significantly different between 100 μM ‘921 treatment alone and cotreatment with 1 mM MnCl2. (C) Fold change (log2) of transcript abundance for all S. aureus genes following treatment with VU0026921 compared to vehicle-treated controls. (D) Fold change (log2) of transcript abundance for all S. aureus genes following treatment with VU0026921 and 1 mM MnCl2 compared to ‘921 alone. For panels C and D, genes involved in metal homeostasis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) detoxification are highlighted. Dashed lines indicate genes with greater than 2-fold change and a false-discovery rate of less than 0.01.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    VU0026921 causes metal accumulation and oxidative stress in S. aureus. Metal isotopes 55Mn (A), 59Co (B), 63Cu (C), 56Fe (D), and 66Zn (E) were measured by ICP-MS in S. aureus Newman treated for 30 min with vehicle, 1 mM MnCl2, 100 μM ‘921, or 100 μM ‘921 + 1 mM MnCl2. Data are mean ± standard deviation normalized to 34S to account for differences in growth of four biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA where ns = P > 0.05, * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01, *** = P < 0.001, and **** = P < 0.0001. (F) ROS levels in S. aureus cultures treated with vehicle, 50 μM ‘921, 1 mM MnCl2, or 50 μM ‘921 + 1 mM MnCl2 for 6 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation for six biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test where ** = P < 0.01 and **** = P < 0.0001. (G) CFU recovered following 24-h treatment of mid-exponential-phase cultures of S. aureus Newman, ΔmntH/C, or ΔsodA/sodM with vehicle, 1 mM MnCl2, 100 μM ‘921, or 1 mM Mn + 100 μM ‘921. Data are mean ± standard deviation combined from three independent triplicate experiments, performed on separate days (n = 9). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test where ### = P < 0.001 compared to WT vehicle-treated bacteria and ** = P < 0.01 and *** = P < 0.001 for the comparisons indicated by the bars. (H) S. aureus Newman was treated with vehicle, 50 μM ‘921, 80 μM MitoTEMPO, or 50 μM ‘921 + 80 μM MitoTEMPO, and growth was monitored by optical density at 600 nm for 24 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation for six biological replicates.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Mn and Co protect S. aureus against VU0026921 toxicity, while Cu exacerbates it. (A to D and F) CFU recovered following 4-h treatment of S. aureus Newman with vehicle, 100 μM ‘921, 100 μM FeSO4 (A), ZnCl2 (B), MnCl2 (C), CoCl2 (D), and CuSO4 (F), or 10 μM ‘921 + 100 μM metal. Data presented are mean ± standard deviation from triplicate measurements. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test where ns = P > 0.05, *** = P < 0.001, and **** = P < 0.0001. (E and G) ROS levels in S. aureus cultures treated with vehicle, 50 μM ‘921, 100 μM CoCl2 (E) or CuSO4 (G), and 50 μM ‘921 + 100 μM metal for 6 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation for six biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined for each condition compared to ‘921 treatment by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test where *** = P < 0.001 and **** = P < 0.0001. (H) USA300, an MRSA strain, and USA300 ΔcopAZ ΔcopBL (Δcop) were treated with vehicle, 5 μM ‘921, 10 μM CuSO4, or 5 μM ‘921 + 10 μM CuSO4, and growth was monitored by optical density at 600 nm for 24 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation for six biological replicates.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Binding of divalent transition metals stabilized VU0026921. (A to H) Absorbance was measured from 280 nm to 600 nm in 10-nm increments of 0 or 100 μM ‘921 combined with vehicle (A) or 500 μM CoCl2 (B), CuSO4 (C), FeSO4 (D), MnCl2 (E), ZnCl2 (F), CaCl2 (G), or MgCl2 (H). Absorbance measurements were taken at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, or 120 min after the addition of metals. The final absorbance spectra are ‘921 + metal with spectra for metal alone subtracted. Spectra displayed are representative of a single experiment that was performed three times. The spectrum of ‘921 at 0 min was included in each panel as a reference of the compound absorbance alone.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Chemical features of VU0026921 required for toxicity. (A) Chemical structures of VU0026921 and analogs. (B) Relative potency of 100 μM (each) analog—VU0026921 (‘921), VU0849731 (‘731), VU0849732 (‘732), VU0849730 (‘730), or VU0849729 (‘729)—measured as growth of S. aureus as a percentage of untreated cells at 4 h for each compound tested at the indicated concentrations. Data are mean ± standard deviation from triplicate measurements. (C) S. aureus Newman was treated with vehicle, 100 μM ‘921, or 100 μM ‘921 analog, and growth was monitored by optical density at 600 nm for 24 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation from triplicate measurements. (D) ROS levels in S. aureus cultures treated with vehicle, 50 μM ‘921, or 50 μM ‘921-2 for 6 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation for six biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test where ns = P > 0.05 and **** = P < 0.0001.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    VU0026921 S. aureus killing is not through fatty acid biosynthesis inhibition. (A and B) MIC of irgasan (A), a FabI inhibitor that halts fatty acid biosynthesis and inhibits S. aureus strain RN4220, and VU0026921 (B). Irgasan has an increased MIC in S. aureus RN4220 mutants with fatty acid biosynthesis disabled when cotreated with oleic acid, while ‘921 (B) does not, indicating that ‘921 does not inhibit fatty acid biosynthesis. Note: no growth is observed for accD mutants in the absence of oleic acid. (C and D) Platensimycin (C), a FabF inhibitor, has an increased MIC in E. faecalis when cotreated with oleic acid, while ‘921 (D) does not, suggesting that ‘921 does not inhibit fatty acid biosynthesis in E. faecalis. All data are mean ± standard deviation for triplicate measurements. Note: 10 μg/ml was the highest concentration of platensimycin tested. The actual MIC of platensimycin against E. faecalis in the presence of oleic acid may be higher.

  • FIG 8
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 8

    VU0026921 is growth inhibitory toward Gram-positive bacteria. (A to F) S. aureus MW2 (A), UAMS1 (B), HG003 (C), 8325-4 (D), RN6390 (E), and SH1000 (F) were treated with vehicle or 5 μM or 20 μM ‘921, and growth was monitored by optical density at 600 nm for 24 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation from triplicate measurements. (G and H) The Gram-positive organisms Bacillus anthracis (G) and Micrococcus luteus (H) were treated with vehicle or 5 μM ‘921, and growth was monitored by optical density at 600 nm for 16 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation from quadruplicate measurements.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • TABLE S1

    (A) MICs for compounds tested for antimicrobial activity against WT and ΔmntH/C S. aureus. MIC was defined as minimum concentration of compound that inhibited growth by at least 50% at 8 h. (B) Mn rescue of compound-mediated growth inhibition at 5 μM. *Rescue: concentration of Mn that resulted in 50% increase in S. aureus growth at 8 h. #N/A indicates that compound is not inhibitory to WT at 5 μM. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Juttukonda et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S1

    Antimicrobial activity of VU0026921. (A) S. aureus Newman was treated with vehicle, 5 μM ‘921, or 5 μM ‘921 + 1 mM MnCl2, and growth was monitored by optical density at 600 nm for 20 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation from triplicate measurements. (B and C) S. aureus Newman was untreated or treated with 50 μM (B) or 3 μM (C) ‘921 that was incubated with shaking in TSB at 37°C for 0, 4, 8, or 24 h prior to the addition of the bacterial inoculum to assess ‘921 compound stability, and growth was monitored by optical density at 600 nm for 24 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation from triplicate measurements. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 2.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Juttukonda et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    (A) Transcripts significantly* changed# by treatment with 100 μM ‘921. *Significance was defined as false-discovery rate (FDR) < 0.001. #Defined as |log2 fold change| >2. (B) COG analysis of upregulated and downregulated genes in S. aureus upon VU0026921 treatment. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Juttukonda et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S3

    Transcripts significantly* changed# between 100 μM ‘921 and 100 μM ‘921 + 1 mM MnCl2 combination treatment. *Significance was defined as FDR < 0.001. #Defined as >2 log2 fold change. Download Table S3, XLSX file, 0.03 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Juttukonda et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S4

    Transcripts significantly* changed# by treatment with 1 mM MnCl2. *Significance was defined as FDR < 0.001. #Defined as >2 log2 fold change. Download Table S4, XLSX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Juttukonda et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S5

    Expression of genes involved in metal homeostasis and detoxification following treatment with VU0026921 with or without Mn. Download Table S5, XLSX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Juttukonda et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    EDTA lowers ‘921-induced metal uptake, and Co protects S. aureus against VU0026921 killing. (A to E) Metal isotopes 55Mn (A), 59Co (B), 63Cu (C), 56Fe (D), and 66Zn (E) were measured by ICP-MS in S. aureus Newman treated for 30 min with vehicle, 100 μM EDTA, 100 μM ‘921, or 100 μM ‘921 + 100 μM EDTA. Data are mean ± standard deviation normalized to 34S to account for differences in growth of four biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA where ns = P > 0.05, * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01, *** = P < 0.001, and **** = P < 0.0001. (F) S. aureus Newman was treated with vehicle or 25 μM ‘921 and increasing molar ratios of CoCl2 to ’921. At 6 h following treatment, growth was determined by optical density at 600 nm. Data are mean ± standard deviation for six biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined for each condition compared to vehicle treatment by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test where ns = P > 0.05 and **** = P < 0.0001. (G) S. aureus Newman was treated with vehicle, 10 μM ‘921, 100 μM CoCl2 or vitamin B12, or 10 μM ‘921 + 100 μM CoCl2 or vitamin B12, and growth was monitored by optical density at 600 nm for 24 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation for six biological replicates. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 2.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Juttukonda et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    VU0026921 is not growth inhibitory towards Gram-negative bacteria. The Gram-negative organisms E. coli DH5α (A), E. coli SLO1B (B), E. coli MG1655 (C), E. coli BL21 (D), P. aeruginosa PAO1 (E), P. aeruginosa PA14 (F), K. pneumoniae TOP2 (G), and A. baumannii 17978 (H) were treated with vehicle or 0 μM (untreated) or 160 μM ‘921, and growth was monitored by optical density at 600 nm for 24 h. Data are mean ± standard deviation from triplicate measurements. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 2.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Juttukonda et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S6

    Bacterial strains used in this study. Download Table S6, XLSX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Juttukonda et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S7

    Primers used in this study. Download Table S7, XLSX file, 0.01 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Juttukonda et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
A Small-Molecule Modulator of Metal Homeostasis in Gram-Positive Pathogens
Lillian J. Juttukonda, William N. Beavers, Daisy Unsihuay, Kwangho Kim, Gleb Pishchany, Kyle J. Horning, Andy Weiss, Hassan Al-Tameemi, Jeffrey M. Boyd, Gary A. Sulikowski, Aaron B. Bowman, Eric P. Skaar
mBio Oct 2020, 11 (5) e02555-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02555-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Small-Molecule Modulator of Metal Homeostasis in Gram-Positive Pathogens
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Small-Molecule Modulator of Metal Homeostasis in Gram-Positive Pathogens
Lillian J. Juttukonda, William N. Beavers, Daisy Unsihuay, Kwangho Kim, Gleb Pishchany, Kyle J. Horning, Andy Weiss, Hassan Al-Tameemi, Jeffrey M. Boyd, Gary A. Sulikowski, Aaron B. Bowman, Eric P. Skaar
mBio Oct 2020, 11 (5) e02555-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02555-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

MRSA
Staphylococcus aureus
antibiotics
cobalt
copper
manganese
metalloregulation

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511