Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

FusB Energizes Import across the Outer Membrane through Direct Interaction with Its Ferredoxin Substrate

Marta Wojnowska, Daniel Walker
M. Stephen Trent, Editor
Marta Wojnowska
aInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Walker
aInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel Walker
M. Stephen Trent
University of Georgia
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02081-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Phytopathogenic Pectobacterium spp. import ferredoxin into the periplasm for proteolytic processing and iron release via the ferredoxin uptake system. Although the ferredoxin receptor FusA and the processing protease FusC have been identified, the mechanistic basis of ferredoxin import is poorly understood. In this work, we demonstrate that protein translocation across the outer membrane is dependent on the TonB-like protein FusB. In contrast to the loss of FusC, loss of FusB or FusA abolishes ferredoxin transport to the periplasm, demonstrating that FusA and FusB work in concert to transport ferredoxin across the outer membrane. In addition to an interaction with the “TonB box” region of FusA, FusB also forms a complex with the ferredoxin substrate, with complex formation required for substrate transport. These data suggest that ferredoxin transport requires energy transduction from the cytoplasmic membrane via FusB both for removal of the FusA plug domain and for substrate translocation through the FusA barrel.

IMPORTANCE The ability to acquire iron is key to the ability of bacteria to cause infection. Plant-pathogenic Pectobacterium spp. are able to acquire iron from plants by transporting the iron-containing protein ferredoxin into the cell from proteolytic processing. In this work, we show that the TonB-like protein FusB plays a key role in transporting ferredoxin across the bacterial outer membrane by directly energizing its transport into the cell. The direct interaction of the TonB-like protein with substrate is unprecedented and explains the requirement for the system-specific TonB homologue in the ferredoxin uptake system. Since multiple genes encoding TonB-like proteins are commonly found in the genomes of Gram-negative bacteria, this may be a common mechanism for the uptake of atypical substrates via TonB-dependent receptors.

INTRODUCTION

Gram-negative bacteria have evolved a number of strategies for the acquisition of iron and other nutrients in which “TonB-dependent” transporters (TBDTs) play a central role (1). In the case of siderophore-mediated iron acquisition, the iron-siderophore complex is imported into the cell, captured by a siderophore-specific periplasmic binding protein, and delivered to an ABC transporter for importation into the cytoplasm (2). For iron acquisition from large host proteins such as transferrin, the iron-containing protein is captured at the cell surface through TBDT binding and the iron stripped and subsequently transported through the lumen of the TBDT (3). In addition to the outer membrane (OM) receptor, whose lumen constitutes the translocation route, TBDT-mediated transport requires a complex of three proteins anchored in the inner membrane: TonB, ExbB, and ExbD (4, 5). The ExbBD-TonB complex enables the entry of the nutrient by removal of a force-labile portion of the plug domain, which obstructs the receptor lumen (6). ExbB and ExbD are related to the flagellar motor proteins and harness proton motive force (PMF) to energize the transport process.

In addition to the uptake of iron siderophores and other metal chelating compounds such as vitamin B12, TBDTs also transport complex carbohydrates and simple sugars (7). A recent study also described the role of a TonB-dependent receptor in protein export, suggesting that TonB-dependent receptors are highly adaptable to the transport of diverse substrates across the OM (8). The flexibility in the range of substrates that are amenable to transport by TBDTs is exploited by protein antibiotics such as colicins and pyocins that use TBDTs as their primary cell surface receptor and translocator (9). As with the uptake of nutrients, translocation of colicins and pyocins via TBDTs is PMF dependent, although the periplasm-spanning protein TonB is required in such cases both to remove the force-labile region of the TBDT-plug domain and subsequently to energize protein translocation across the OM (10). Protein translocation occurs by direct interaction with an N-terminal intrinsically unstructured region of the toxin that, similarly to the TBDTs, carries a TonB-binding motif (10).

We recently demonstrated that TBDT-mediated iron acquisition from the iron-sulfur cluster containing protein ferredoxin represents an unprecedented example of protein translocation into the bacterial cell for nutrient acquisition (11). Ferredoxin binding at the cell surface is mediated by the TBDT FusA protein, and, following transport of intact ferredoxin into the periplasm, the substrate is subjected to proteolytic processing by the M16 protease FusC (11, 12). Cleavage by FusC results in release of the iron-sulfur cluster and is required for effective iron acquisition from ferredoxin by Pectobacterium. Together with the genes encoding FusA and FusC, the Fus operon contains two additional genes, with fusB encoding a TonB homologue and fusD a putative ABC transporter (12). Interestingly, the M-type pectocins M1 and M2, which we have previously described, parasitize the ferredoxin uptake system through an N-terminal ferredoxin domain that is highly homologous to plant ferredoxin domains (13, 14).

More recently, the X-ray structure of FusC bound to ferredoxin has been reported, showing that substrate recognition occurs at a site distant from the active site (15). Furthermore, only parts of the ferredoxin molecule are visible in the structure, implying that the bound substrate is largely present in an unstructured form. On the basis of these data, it was suggested that ferredoxin transport occurs by means of a Brownian ratchet mechanism in which FusC acts as a periplasmic anchor to facilitate translocation of ferredoxin across the OM via the lumen of FusA (12, 15). Similar mechanisms have been postulated to account for mitochondrial protein uptake, whereby cytoplasmically synthesized proteins are translocated via the TOM and TIM23 complexes (16, 17). As such, this would represent a hitherto-unexpected evolutionary link between mitochondrial and plastid protein import and bacterial protein import via the Fus uptake system (FUS) and other postulated protein uptake systems.

In this work, we show that FusC does not facilitate ferredoxin import and that, like the import of other TBDT substrates, ferredoxin uptake is PMF dependent. Instead, we show that the TonB homologue encoded within the fus operon, FusB, is required for ferredoxin import and that the mechanism of ferredoxin import involves a direct interaction between FusB and the ferredoxin substrate. The evidence pointing to a direct interaction of the TonB-like protein with the substrate is unprecedented and explains the requirement for the system-specific TonB homologue in the Fus system. Our data also show that, in addition to the direct interaction with the substrate, FusB fulfils another role—similarly to other TonB proteins—in interacting with the “TonB box” of FusA for plug displacement. Since multiple genes encoding TonB-like proteins are commonly found in the genomes of Gram-negative bacteria, this may be a common mechanism for the uptake of atypical substrates via TonB-dependent receptors.

RESULTS

Ferredoxin import is independent of FusC but requires proton motive force.We previously showed that FusC is a highly specific protease that targets plant ferredoxin to release iron from this host protein in the periplasm of Pectobacterium spp. (11). However, it has also been suggested that FusC plays an additional role in iron acquisition through a direct involvement in ferredoxin transport across the outer membrane by means of a Brownian ratchet mechanism, specifically acting as a periplasmic anchor (15). Our own previous work suggests that if FusC does play a role in ferredoxin import, this role is not essential since the accumulation of Arabidopsis ferredoxin can still be observed in a Pectobacterium carotovorum LMG2410 (PcLMG2410) strain lacking FusC (11). However, using Arabidopsis ferredoxin (FerAra), it is not possible to directly compare the rates and extents of ferredoxin uptake between wild-type (WT) and ΔfusC P. carotovorum since FerAra is cleaved by FusC upon importation into the periplasm in the WT strain; hence, on the basis of these data, we could not rule out a possible role for FusC in ferredoxin import.

To test the hypothesis that FusC facilitates translocation of ferredoxin to the periplasm, we compared the levels of uptake of potato ferredoxin (FerPot) in wild-type and ΔfusC PcLMG2410. FerPot was used as we had observed that although, similarly to FerAra, it can be transported into cells (Fig. 1a), unlike FerAra and spinach ferredoxin (FerSp), both of which support robust growth of PcLMG2410 under iron-limiting conditions (12, 13), it is not cleaved at an appreciable rate by FusC and so accumulates intracellularly in wild-type PcLMG2410 (Fig. 1b). To compare the levels of uptake of FerPot in wild-type and ΔfusC PcLMG2410, cells were grown under iron-limiting conditions through the addition of the iron chelator 2,2′-bipyridine and were supplemented with FerPot. The amount of FerPot in whole-cell extracts and in the media was determined by immunoblotting. Levels of FerPot obtained from cell extracts increased at the same rate in whole-cell extracts, and rates of removal of ferredoxin from the media were similar (Fig. 1c). These data show that FusC does not play a role in protein import and that the role of FusC in iron acquisition is likely restricted to proteolytic processing of ferredoxin as we previously reported (11).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Import of ferredoxin is FusC independent and requires proton motive force. (A) Uptake of His-tagged FerAra and FerPot by ΔfusC cells over time determined by immunoblotting of whole-cell extracts. GroEL served as the loading control. (B) FusC-mediated cleavage assays of plant ferredoxins. Comparable cleavage rates were observed in >5 independent experiments. (C) Comparison of levels of FerPot uptake by wild-type (WT) and ΔfusC cells, with TolB as the loading control. The bottom panel shows the concomitant depletion of ferredoxin from the media. (D) Ferredoxin import assays in the presence of protonophore CCCP. FerPot was used as a reporter in wild-type cells, while FerAra was used in ΔfusC cells. TolB served as the loading control.

To further probe the mechanism of ferredoxin uptake, we tested the ability of PcLMG2410 cells to accumulate FerPot under iron-limiting conditions and in the presence of the uncoupling agent carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), which dissipates the PMF through transport of protons across the cytoplasmic membrane (18). The intracellular accumulation of FerPot by PcLMG2410 was markedly reduced in the presence of 10 μM CCCP, relative to cells grown in the absence of the uncoupling agent, and was abolished in the presence of 100 μM CCCP (Fig. 1d). Similar effects resulting from the action of CCCP were observed on the intracellular accumulation of Arabidopsis ferredoxin by ΔfusC LMG2410 (Fig. 1d). These data show that, analogously to other TBDT-mediated transport processes (10, 19), the import of ferredoxin is PMF dependent and a Brownian ratchet mechanism is unlikely to play a key role in ferredoxin import in Pectobacterium spp.

FusB mediates ferredoxin import into the periplasm.As we previously reported, in addition to fusA and fusC, the Fus operon carries genes that encode a TonB homologue, FusB, and an ABC transporter, FusD (12). Given the documented role of TonB in siderophore import in many bacterial species, we supposed that FusB might play a similar role in protein import, having perhaps evolved additional functionality required to mediate the passage of a large substrate through the lumen of the TBDT FusA. To test this hypothesis, we created ΔfusA and ΔfusB strains in PcLMG2410 and initially probed them using growth enhancement assays under iron-limiting conditions. As indicated by the loss of growth enhancement both on solid media (Fig. 2a) and in liquid culture (Fig. 2b), these two genes encode proteins which are essential for Fus-mediated iron acquisition. The possibility that deletion of either gene affected the expression or level of FusC and thus indirectly affected the growth enhancement phenotype was ruled out by immunoblotting whole-cell extracts with anti-FusC antiserum (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). We further investigated the ability of the ΔfusA and ΔfusB PcLMG2410 mutant strains to import ferredoxin relative to wild-type and ΔfusC strains using FerPot, which cannot be cleaved by FusC. Consistent with the hypothesized role of FusB in protein import, and in contrast to the wild-type and ΔfusC strains, we did not observe intracellular accumulation of FerPot in ΔfusA and ΔfusB PcLMG2410 (Fig. 2c). The ferredoxin import phenotype lost in the ΔfusA and ΔfusB strains was restored by plasmid-based complementation of fusA and fusB, respectively (Fig. 2d). In these experiments, the production of FusA and FusB was inducible by the use of IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) under the control of the T5 promoter, although in the case of FusB complementation, leaky expression in the absence of IPTG is sufficient to restore protein import.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

FusA and FusB are required for ferredoxin uptake. (A) Growth enhancement assay using spinach ferredoxin spotted onto a soft-agar overlay containing the wild-type (WT) strain, deletion strains, and deletion strains recomplemented in trans with the respective plasmids. Similar phenotypes were observed in 5 independent assays. (B) Growth curve comparing the rates of growth of the wild-type strain and each deletion strain in the absence and presence of Arabidopsis ferredoxin. Comparable rates were observed in 3 independent experiments. (C) Internalization assay of FerPot. Mid-log-phase cells of each strain were supplemented with 2,2′-bipyridine and 1 μM ferredoxin and grown for 1 h, and whole-cell extracts were probed with anti-His antiserum for His-tagged FerPot. GroEL served as the loading control. (D) Internalization assay of His-tagged FerPot, including deletion strains recomplemented in trans using plasmids harboring the corresponding genes. ΔA+pA, ΔfusA plus pFusA; ΔB+pB, ΔfusB plus pFusB. Prior to the addition of 2,2′-bipyridine and ferredoxin, the cultures of recomplemented strains were split in two and either supplemented with 0.5 mM IPTG (“+”) or grown in the absence of inducer (“-”). TolB served as the loading control. (E) Internalization assay using His-tagged FerAra (see panel C). (F) Depletion assay showing the gradual reduction in the level of Arabidopsis ferredoxin in the media derived from uninoculated (-), wild-type, ΔfusA (ΔA), and ΔfusB (ΔB) cell cultures.

FIG S1

FusC is produced in ΔfusA and ΔfusB strains. The immunoblot shows the level of FusC (101 kDa) in the periplasmic fractions extracted from wild-type, ΔfusA (ΔA), ΔfusB (ΔB), and ΔfusC (ΔC) cells grown to mid-log phase in the presence of 2,2′-bipyridine. Download FIG S1, JPG file, 0.5 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Wojnowska and Walker.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

To ensure that the abrogation of substrate import is not specific to FerPot, we also monitored the ability of the ΔfusA and ΔfusB strains to utilize FerAra. However, for this substrate, instead of measuring intracellular ferredoxin accumulation, we determined loss of ferredoxin from the growth media, since accumulation of FerAra was observed only in the LMG2410 ΔfusC strain (Fig. 2e). Consistent with the internalization assay and growth enhancement assays, the ferredoxin content of the media decreased over time in the presence of wild-type cells but not in the presence of the ΔfusA and ΔfusB strains, indicating that both FusA and FusB are required for FerAra uptake (Fig. 2f). To exclude the possibility that the increased depletion of ferredoxin from the media in the wild-type cultures was due to the higher growth rate of this strain than of the ΔfusA and ΔfusB strains in the presence of FerAra, we directly compared levels of FerAra depletion from the media using the ΔfusA and ΔfusC strains (Fig. S2), as neither of these strains shows a ferredoxin-dependent growth enhancement. Over 7 h, FerAra was gradually depleted from the media by the ΔfusC strain and accumulated in the cells, as indicated by immunoblots of whole-cell extracts obtained at the end of the assay. In contrast, the level of FerAra in the media of the ΔfusA strain remained unchanged and no ferredoxin was detected in whole-cell extracts, providing further evidence that deletion of fusA (and fusB) abrogates the import of FerAra.

FIG S2

Comparison of levels of FerAra uptake by ΔfusA and ΔfusC cells. Upon reaching an OD600 of 0.5, both cultures were supplemented with 2,2′-bipyridine and FerAra (1 μM) and grown for a further 7 h. Immunoblots show the level of ferredoxin present in the media at each time point and in the final whole-cell extracts at 7 h. GroEL served as the loading control for the whole-cell extracts. Download FIG S2, JPG file, 0.4 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Wojnowska and Walker.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FusB directly interacts with the TonB box of FusA.Having determined that the TonB-like protein FusB is required for ferredoxin import, we aimed to elucidate the mechanism of ferredoxin uptake. Analysis of the FusA sequence showed the presence of a putative TonB box, DTILVRST, with a sequence similar to that of TonB boxes from well-characterized Escherichia coli TBDTs and other PcLMG2410 TBDTs (Fig. S3). The functional importance of this putative TonB box region was demonstrated using ferredoxin import assay and plasmid-based complementation of the ΔfusA strain, which showed that proline substitutions within the putative TonB box abolished internalization of the FusA substrate ferredoxin (Fig. S4). The similarity of the TonB box of FusA to the TonB boxes of other PcLMG2410 and E. coli TBDTs suggests that FusA may interact with PcLMG2410 TonB and not with FusB. Although PcLMG2410 has 6 genes that encode TonB-like proteins, we hypothesized that the protein that was most similar to E. coli TonB, and that we refer to here as PcTonB, would fulfil the same function as this protein in servicing multiple TBDTs, with the primary function of dislocating the plug domain to enable substrate transport.

FIG S3

Sequence alignment of the putative TonB box regions of FusA against other P. carotovorum (“Pc”) LMG2410 and E. coli TonB box regions. The numbers refer to the position of the predicted TonB box in the mature protein. Three P. carotovorum LMG2410 proteins were not included as their TonB boxes were not clearly identifiable. “Sm” refers to Serratia marcescens and “Ec” to E. coli. The consensus sequence shown at the bottom was generated using Weblogo. Download FIG S3, JPG file, 0.8 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Wojnowska and Walker.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Mutations within the putative FusA TonB box affect ferredoxin transport. (A) Potato ferredoxin import assay of ΔfusA cells recomplemented with a gene encoding either wild-type or FusA variants. (B) Outer membrane extracts confirming the expression and appropriate localization of wild-type and mutant FusA. Download FIG S4, JPG file, 0.6 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Wojnowska and Walker.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

To determine if TonB or FusB or both TonB and FusB interact directly with FusA, we produced a construct consisting of the N-terminal region of FusA (residues 21 to 66), excluding the signal peptide region, fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) (FusANTR-GFP) and determined if this interacts with the isolated C-terminal domains of PcTonB (TonBCTD) and FusB (FusBCTD) by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Clearly identifiable heat data representing binding were observed on titration of FusANTR-GFP into FusBCTD, although the affinity of FusBCTD for FusANTR-GFP is weak (57 μM) (Fig. 3a). No heat data representing binding were observed on titration of isolated GFP into FusBCTD (Fig. S5), showing that the C-terminal domain of FusB specifically interacts with the N-terminal region of FusA. Interestingly, similar heat data representing binding were observed on titration of FusANTR-GFP into TonBCTD (Fig. S6), demonstrating that the N-terminal region of FusA can also interact with PcTonB.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

FusB interacts with the FusA “TonB box” and, unlike PcTonB, is required for ferredoxin uptake. (A) ITC binding isotherm of 1 mM FusANTR-GFP titrated into 90 μM FusBCTD. The calculated Kd for the FusANTR-GFP-FusBCTD complex is 57 (±12) μM (n = 3). (B) Growth enhancement assay using spinach ferredoxin on soft-agar overlay containing ΔtonB cells. “x4” refers to the dilution factor. The experiment was repeated 5 times with comparable outcomes. (C) Uptake of His-tagged potato ferredoxin by ΔtonB and wild-type cells. Whole-cell extracts obtained after 1 h by incubation of each cell type with ferredoxin were probed with anti-His antiserum. TolB served as the loading control. The experiment was performed 4 times with comparable results. (D) Growth assay of wild-type (WT), ΔtonB, and ΔfusB cells spotted onto LB agar (LB) or LB agar supplemented with 400 μM 2,2′-bipyridine (LB+BIP). Comparable phenotypes were observed in two independent experiments.

FIG S5

GFP does not interact with FusBCTD. Data represent titration of 1.2 mM GFP, resulting from TEV-mediated cleavage of FusANTR-GFP, into 60 μM FusBCTD. Download FIG S5, JPG file, 0.4 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Wojnowska and Walker.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S6

TonBCTD forms a complex with the N-terminal domain of FusA. ITC was performed by titrating 1.2 mM FusANTR-GFP into 45 μM TonBCTD. Download FIG S6, JPG file, 0.2 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Wojnowska and Walker.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

To determine if the PcTonB plays a role in ferredoxin uptake, we deleted the corresponding gene in PcLMG2410 and tested the growth enhancement phenotype of this strain in the presence of FerSp. In contrast to deletion of fusB, the loss of tonB did not reduce the growth enhancement phenotype (Fig. 3b); in fact, the ΔtonB strain showed zones of growth enhancement in the presence of FerSp that were more prominent than those seen with the wild-type strain and showed increased intracellular accumulation of FerPot relative to wild-type PcLMG2410 (Fig. 3c). However, PcLMG2410 ΔtonB exhibited poor growth in the presence of 2,2′-bipyridine relative to the wild-type strain (Fig. 3d), with very faint growth observable after 24 h. These data indicate that, although PcTonB does play the expected generic role in iron uptake, this does not include iron acquisition from ferredoxin. Furthermore, despite the aforementioned observation that TonB interacts with FusA in vitro (and possibly in vivo), this interaction is not sufficient for ferredoxin uptake. Indeed, there may be competition between FusB and TonB for complex formation with FusA, with only the FusB-FusA complex being productive with respect to ferredoxin uptake.

FusB interacts directly with the ferredoxin substrate.The ability of FusB and PcTonB to interact with FusA, but with only the former able to mediate ferredoxin uptake, suggests that FusB plays an additional role essential for ferredoxin import. One possibility is that FusB directly interacts with the protein substrate after the initial binding of ferredoxin to FusA at the cell surface. To test this, we sought to determine if ferredoxin forms a complex with the isolated C-terminal domain of FusB by size exclusion chromatography (SEC). SEC of ferredoxin mixed with FusBCTD monitored at 280 nm and 330 nm gave a peak that indicated the presence of a species of higher molecular weight than FusBCTD or FerSp alone, providing evidence of complex formation (Fig. 4a). We further investigated the formation of the FusBCTD-FerSp complex by isothermal titration calorimetry, titrating FerSP into FusBCTD (Fig. 4b). These data show that FusB interacts directly with the ferredoxin substrate. In contrast, no complex formation was observed between ferredoxin and the purified C-terminal domain of TonB (TonBCTD) using SEC (Fig. 4c).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

FusB interacts with ferredoxin substrate. (A) Overlaid size exclusion chromatograms of FusBCTD (blue) and spinach ferredoxin (green) and a mixture of the two proteins (orange), with the arrows pointing at the ferredoxin-FusBCTD complex. Similar results were obtained from 5 independent runs. (B) ITC binding isotherm of 600 μM FerSp titrated into 70 μM FusBCTD. The calculated Kd value for the FerSp-FusBCTD complex is 8.7 (±3.5) μM (n = 3). (C) TonBCTD does not form a complex with ferredoxin. Overlay of size exclusion chromatograms shows TonBCTD in the absence (blue trace) and in the presence (orange trace) of FerSp. (D) Size exclusion chromatograms (280 and 330 nm) of FusBCTD R176K/R177K alone (blue) or in the presence of spinach ferredoxin (orange) showing no complex formation. (E) ITC titration of FerSp into FusBCTD R176K/R177K showing only heat data correlating to dilution. (F) Ferredoxin import assay showing the level of uptake of His-tagged potato ferredoxin by ΔfusB cells complemented with plasmids encoding either wild-type (WT) or FusBCTD R176K/R177K (2K). The experiment was performed 2 times.

Inspection of the amino acid sequence of FusB shows that the N-terminal portion of the predicted globular domain and the preceding linker contained a significant number of positively charged amino acids; such amino acids were absent from PcLMG2410 and E. coli proteins (Fig. S7). Two such residues (Arg176 and Arg177) were found in place of the highly conserved Gln-Pro-Gln residues, which form a part of the BtuB TonB box binding motif (QPQYP) in E. coli TonB (20). This arginine motif is located within a loop/linker region of TonB proteins, connecting the periplasm-spanning and globular domains. Substitution of the two FusBCTD arginine residues with lysines rendered a folded protein that did not comigrate with ferredoxin in SEC (Fig. 4d), and no heat data representing binding were detected by ITC on titration of FerSp into FusBCTD R176K/R177K (Fig. 4e). Similarly, PcLMG2410 ΔfusB could not be complemented with a pFusB plasmid encoding the FusB R176K/R177K variant (Fig. 4f). Therefore, at least one of these two arginine residues appears to be critical for FusB-substrate interaction.

FIG S7

ClustalW sequence alignment of the C-terminal domains of FusB, PcTonB, and EcTonB. Alignments started at residue 211 of FusB, residue 158 of PcTonB, and residue 140 of EcTonB. Black arrows indicate the highly conserved Tyr and Pro residues; red ones show arginines in FusB that were present in the first loop of the C-terminal domain. Download FIG S7, JPG file, 0.6 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Wojnowska and Walker.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DISCUSSION

Our recent discovery that ferredoxin is imported into the periplasm of P. carotovorum revealed an unprecedented example of protein uptake for nutrient acquisition in Gram-negative bacteria (11). In this work, we define key aspects of the mechanism of ferredoxin transport across the outer membrane. In a recent report, it was hypothesized that the M16 protease FusC acts as a periplasmic anchor that facilitates ferredoxin uptake by means of Brownian-ratchet mechanism (15). However, the data presented here are inconsistent with this model, showing that ferredoxin import is independent of FusC. Instead, ferredoxin uptake requires energy transduction from the PMF and the TonB-like protein FusB. Therefore, the mechanism of ferredoxin import shares some similarity with the mechanism of import of widely studied substrates of TBDTs, such iron siderophores and vitamin B12 (4, 21). For these substrates, according to the currently accepted models of TonB-dependent transport, the major role of TonB is in the displacement or partial displacement of the plug domain from their specific TBDTs (6, 10).

Interestingly, in the case of FusA, both FusB and PcTonB are able to interact with its N-terminal region and so both these proteins may be able to facilitate displacement of the FusA plug domain. However, deletion of the genes encoding the two TonB proteins showed that only FusB is essential for ferredoxin transport, demonstrating an additional role for FusB in this process that cannot be fulfilled by PcTonB. Although the affinity of FusBCTD for FusANTR is low (57 μM), comparable complexes showing low affinity between TBDT TonB-binding peptides and TonB proteins have been previously described. For example, the affinity reported for the TonB-like protein HasB interaction with a 21-mer HasR N-terminal peptide was 25 μM (22). Similarly weak interactions between TonB and TBDT TonB box peptides have been reported for FhuA (36 μM) (23) and BtuB (9.4 μM) (6). However, complex formation between TonB and TonB-binding peptides is characterized by β-strand augmentation, which is known to result in the formation of mechanically strong complexes (6). Indeed, it has been demonstrated in vitro using atomic force microscopy that the TonB-BtuB Ton box complex is sufficiently mechanically robust to induce partial unfolding of the BtuB plug domain, forming a channel through which the vitamin B12 substrate can translocate (6).

The ability of FusB to form a complex with ferredoxin, which PcTonB lacks, indicates that this additional role involves the direct interaction of FusB with the ferredoxin substrate and that this complex formation is essential for ferredoxin transport through the lumen of FusA. Consistent with this, we identified an arginine motif that is required for FusB-mediated ferredoxin uptake by P. carotovorum and formation of the FusB-ferredoxin complex. Our current model of Fus-mediated iron acquisition, whereby FusB fulfils two distinct roles, is schematically shown in Fig. 5. In this model, binding of the substrate on the extracellular side of FusA releases the TonB box into the periplasmic space, where it is captured by FusB. Due to the dimensions of the globular ferredoxin, which are similar to those of the lumen of its FusA TBDT (11), ferredoxin is unlikely to be able to readily diffuse into the periplasm after removal of the FusA plug domain. We therefore hypothesize that the interaction of FusB with the substrate involves a further PMF-dependent step required to pull the ferredoxin substrate through the lumen of FusA. This would involve the C-terminal domain of FusB, which is of a size comparable to those of plant ferredoxins, entering the lumen of FusA to contact ferredoxin on the cell surface. The FusB-ferredoxin complex would then be able to be pulled into the periplasm, using the ExbBD complex and PMF, after which the substrate would be processed by FusC. Although we present a model relying on a single FusB protein per import cycle, we cannot exclude the possibility that the removal of the FusA plug and ferredoxin import would involve two separate FusB molecules.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Proposed mechanism of FUS-mediated ferredoxin import mechanism. In the proposed mechanism, FusB (green) fulfils two roles, first, in displacement of the FusA plug domain, and, second, in directly mediating ferredoxin translocation via the FusA lumen. Binding of ferredoxin (red) to FusA at the cell surface (step 1) causes release of the FusA TonB box into the periplasm (step 2), where it is bound by FusB, which dislocates the plug domain (step 3) through energy transduced from the PMF via the ExbBD complex (step 4). FusB is then able to enter the lumen of FusA and bind ferredoxin (step 5) and, through transduction of the PMF, translocate ferredoxin into the periplasm (step 6). The plug domain is then able to reenter the FusA barrel (step 7) and return the FusA and FusB proteins to their resting states. Ferredoxin is then bound by FusC in the periplasm (step 8), which proteolytically cleaves the substrate, releasing the iron-sulfur cluster (yellow) (step 9).

The occurrence of genes encoding multiple TonB-like proteins is a common feature of many Gram-negative bacteria (24), and specific TonB proteins are required in some cases for the uptake of specific substrates, as in the case of TonB2 of Vibrio anguillarum for anguibactin uptake (25), while other cases exhibit some level of functional redundancy (26). However, to our knowledge the Fus system represents the only substrate import system in which a TonB protein has been shown to directly interact with the substrate. This additional functionality displayed by FusB may reflect the nature of the ferredoxin substrate, which is atypically large in comparison to the well-studied TBDT siderophore substrates. In this respect, the uptake of ferredoxin is similar to the TonB-dependent uptake of the colicins and pyocins, which directly interact with TonB after threading their TonB box-containing intrinsically unstructured translocation domain (IUTD) though the lumen of the corresponding TBDT (10, 27). However, since plant ferredoxins are highly stable proteins that lack any kind of similar unstructured regions, our hypothesis is that in order to contact ferredoxin, FusB must enter the FusA lumen and contact FusA-bound substrate at the cell surface. This proposed mechanism also explains why the ferredoxin-containing bacteriocins do not require an IUTD that contains a TonB box to cross the P. carotovorum outer membrane, with FusB proteins able to directly contact their ferredoxin receptor-binding domains at the cell surface, thus enabling parasitization of the Fus system (12, 14).

In summary, we describe a novel mechanism of TonB-dependent nutrient uptake that requires a direct interaction between the substrate and the cognate TonB protein. The occurrence of multiple TonB proteins in many Gram-negative bacteria suggests that similar mechanisms may operate for atypical TBDT substrates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and media.E. coli was grown in LB broth or plated on LB agar and grown at 37°C. DH5α and BL21(DE3) strains were used as host strains for cloning and for IPTG-induced protein expression, respectively. P. carotovorum was grown in LB broth or plated on LB agar at 30°C with the addition of the iron chelator 2,2′-bipyridine where specified. LB media and agar for culturing plasmid-complemented deletion strains always contained 100 μg ml−1 ampicillin.

Generation of gene knockout strains and plasmids.The fusA (KAA3668913), fusB (KAA3668912), fusC (KAA3668914), and tonB (KAA3668374) sequences were determined from the genome sequence of P. carotovorum LMG2410 (GenBank BioProject accession no. PRJNA543207) (28). Genes of PcLMG2410 were deleted using the lambda red method as described previously (11, 29). The primers used for amplifying the kanamycin cassette from pKD4 template plasmid and gene sequences from genomic DNA and for plasmid site-directed mutagenesis are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. The gene knockouts were confirmed by PCR and sequencing. Table S2 shows all the plasmids used in this study. To construct all of the plasmids, except pFusANTR-GFP, the respective genes were amplified from wild-type genomic DNA using primers that contained flanking regions with NdeI (forward) and XhoI (reverse) restriction enzyme sites. Purified PCR products were digested and ligated into NdeI/XhoI-digested pJ404, which carries ampicillin resistance. To generate pFusANTR-GFP, the sequence encoding the N-terminal portion of FusA was amplified with primers containing XhoI (forward) and BamHI (reverse) restriction enzyme sites and the PCR products were inserted into XhoI/BamHI-digested pWaldo plasmid (30). The complementation plasmids were transformed into competent LMG2410 knockout strains by electroporation.

TABLE S1

List of primers used in this study. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Wojnowska and Walker.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

List of plasmids used in this study. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.01 MB.
Copyright © 2020 Wojnowska and Walker.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Protein production and purification.FusC, FusBCTD, TonBCTD, FusANTR-GFP, and all ferredoxin proteins were overproduced in E. coli and purified as described previously (11, 12), with the exception of spinach ferredoxin (FerSp), which was purchased from Sigma. GFP alone used as a negative control in ITC was produced by cleavage of FusANTR-GFP with tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease for 2 h at room temperature (RT) at a 50:1 ratio. The resulting GFP-His8 was separated from residual TEV protease by size exclusion chromatography, and the removal of the N-terminal region of FusA was confirmed by SDS-PAGE.

Growth enhancement assays.Growth enhancement in the presence of ferredoxin was performed on solid media as previously described (11). Briefly, 10 ml of 0.8% precooled agar was supplemented with 50 μl of mid-log culture in LB media and poured onto an LB agar base containing 400 μM 2,2′-bipyridine (and 0.2 mM IPTG where specified). For plasmid based complementation, Ampicillin (100 μg/ml) was added to the LB media base. A 4-μl volume of ferredoxin was spotted onto the solidified plate at the specified concentration. For growth enhancement in liquid media, bacteria were grown in M9 minimal media. Cultures (10 ml) were inoculated with a 1-in-50 dilution of overnight LB cultures and, upon reaching an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.45, were supplemented with 0.2 μM FerAra, and growth was monitored by measuring the OD600 for 6 h.

Ferredoxin internalization and depletion assays.All experiments were repeated at least once. The time course of ferredoxin internalization was initiated by supplementing LB cultures of wild-type or ΔfusC cells (OD600 of 0.5) with 2,2′-bipyridine to reach a final concentration of 200 μM. FerAra or FerPot was added to reach a final concentration of 1 μM, and the cultures were grown at 30°C with shaking over the specified time. At each time point, a volume equivalent to 1 ml of cell suspension at OD600 of 0.5 was removed and the cells were spun down and treated with BugBuster (Merck) for extraction of soluble protein. To determine if the ΔfusA and ΔfusB strains could take up ferredoxin, LB cultures of WT and deletion strains at an OD of ∼0.5 were supplemented with 200 μM 2,2′-bipyridine and 1 μM Arabidopsis or 5 μM potato ferredoxin. After 2 h at 30°C with shaking, 1 ml of cells was pelleted and soluble proteins were extracted using BugBuster (Merck). For internalization experiments involving plasmid-complemented deletion strains, LB cultures were grown until an OD600 of 0.4 was reached, whereupon 2,2′-bipyridine and potato ferredoxin were added. ΔfusA+pFusA and ΔfusB+pFusB cultures were split into two separate tubes, one of which was supplemented with IPTG to reach a final concentration of 0.2 mM. After 2 h, cells were harvested and subjected to BugBuster extraction as described above.

Depletion of Arabidopsis ferredoxin was monitored in 2 ml M9 minimal medium cultures of WT, ΔfusA, and ΔfusB strains over the course of 4 h. Each culture, as well as 2 ml of uninoculated media (negative control), was supplemented with 100 μM 2,2′-bipyridine and 1 μM FerAra. At each time point, 50 μl of culture was removed from each tube, and after the cells were pelleted, the supernatant was mixed with SDS loading dye.

The effect of dissipating PMF on ferredoxin uptake was determined using protonophore CCCP (Sigma), which was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to reach a final concentration of 10 mM. Mid-log cultures of wild-type and ΔfusC PcLMG2410 in M9 media were supplemented with 300 μM 2,2′-bipyridine, and 2 ml of each culture was mixed with 18 μl DMSO and 2 μl CCCP stock (for a 10 μM CCCP final concentration) or 20 μl CCCP stock (for a 10 μM final CCCP concentration) or with 20 μl DMSO alone for the “no-CCCP” control. The cultures were mixed and incubated at room temperature for 10 min, after which the wild-type cultures were supplemented with 1 μM FerPot and the ΔfusC cultures with 0.2 μM FerAra. After 45 min of incubation at 30°C with shaking, 1 ml of each culture was pelleted, washed with 0.5 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and subjected to BugBuster extraction.

Ferredoxin cleavage assays.Cleavage reactions were performed at RT in a mixture containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 2 μM FusC, and 250 μM ferredoxin. At each time point, a 12-μl volume was removed and mixed with SDS loading dye. Proteins were resolved on a 16% SDS-PAGE gel and visualized by Coomassie staining.

Analytical size exclusion chromatography.Proteins were concentrated to ∼600 μM, and 20 μl of TonBCTD or the relevant construct of FusBCTD was mixed with an equal volume of FerSp. The mixtures were then diluted with SEC buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl) to 0.2 ml and loaded onto Superdex 75 10/300 column (GE Healthcare), preequilibrated in the same buffer. Each protein was also passed through the column individually for reference. The chromatograms were recorded at both 280 and 330 nm.

Isothermal titration calorimetry.Experiments were performed on a MicroCal iTC200 instrument (Malvern) at 25°C in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)–150 mM NaCl, with a differential power setting of 3. All proteins were dialyzed against the ITC buffer overnight at 4°C with the exception of FusBCTD and TonBCTD, which were subjected to gel filtration in ITC buffer immediately before the experiment. Each type of titration was repeated at least once using different batches of purified proteins. Injection volumes of 2 μl were used, and the titrations were continued until the signal corresponded to heat data representing dilution. The magnitude of heat data representing dilution for each titrant was established in a separate experiment, where the titrant was injected into buffer. Dissociation constant (Kd) values are expressed as means (± standard errors of the means [SEM]).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grant BB/L02022X/1).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 24 July 2020
    • Accepted 5 October 2020
    • Published 27 October 2020
  • Copyright © 2020 Wojnowska and Walker.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Krewulak KD,
    2. Vogel HJ
    . 2011. TonB or not TonB: is that the question? Biochem Cell Biol 89:87–97. doi:10.1139/O10-141.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Noinaj N,
    2. Guillier M,
    3. Barnard TJ,
    4. Buchanan SK
    . 2010. TonB-dependent transporters: regulation, structure, and function. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:43–60. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Noinaj N,
    2. Easley NC,
    3. Oke M,
    4. Mizuno N,
    5. Gumbart J,
    6. Boura E,
    7. Steere AN,
    8. Zak O,
    9. Aisen P,
    10. Tajkhorshid E,
    11. Evans RW,
    12. Gorringe AR,
    13. Mason AB,
    14. Steven AC,
    15. Buchanan SK
    . 2012. Structural basis for iron piracy by pathogenic Neisseria. Nature 483:53–58. doi:10.1038/nature10823.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Celia H,
    2. Noinaj N,
    3. Zakharov SD,
    4. Bordignon E,
    5. Botos I,
    6. Santamaria M,
    7. Barnard TJ,
    8. Cramer WA,
    9. Lloubes R,
    10. Buchanan SK
    . 2016. Structural insight into the role of the Ton complex in energy transduction. Nature 538:60–65. doi:10.1038/nature19757.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Maki-Yonekura S,
    2. Matsuoka R,
    3. Yamashita Y,
    4. Shimizu H,
    5. Tanaka M,
    6. Iwabuki F,
    7. Yonekura K
    . 2018. Hexameric and pentameric complexes of the ExbBD energizer in the Ton system. Elife 7:e35419. doi:10.7554/eLife.35419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hickman SJ,
    2. Cooper REM,
    3. Bellucci L,
    4. Paci E,
    5. Brockwell DJ
    . 2017. Gating of TonB-dependent transporters by substrate-specific forced remodelling. Nat Commun 8:14804. doi:10.1038/ncomms14804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Glenwright AJ,
    2. Pothula KR,
    3. Bhamidimarri SP,
    4. Chorev DS,
    5. Baslé A,
    6. Firbank SJ,
    7. Zheng H,
    8. Robinson CV,
    9. Winterhalter M,
    10. Kleinekathöfer U,
    11. Bolam DN,
    12. van den Berg B
    . 2017. Structural basis for nutrient acquisition by dominant members of the human gut microbiota. Nature 541:407–411. doi:10.1038/nature20828.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gómez-Santos N,
    2. Glatter T,
    3. Koebnik R,
    4. Świątek-Połatyńska MA,
    5. Søgaard-Andersen L
    . 2019. A TonB-dependent transporter is required for secretion of protease PopC across the bacterial outer membrane. Nat Commun 10:1360. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09366-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kleanthous C
    . 2010. Swimming against the tide: progress and challenges in our understanding of colicin translocation. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:843–848. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. White P,
    2. Joshi A,
    3. Rassam P,
    4. Housden NG,
    5. Kaminska R,
    6. Goult JD,
    7. Redfield C,
    8. McCaughey LC,
    9. Walker D,
    10. Mohammed S,
    11. Kleanthous C
    . 2017. Exploitation of an iron transporter for bacterial protein antibiotic import. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:12051–12056. doi:10.1073/pnas.1713741114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mosbahi K,
    2. Wojnowska M,
    3. Albalat A,
    4. Walker D
    . 2018. Bacterial iron acquisition mediated by outer membrane translocation and cleavage of a host protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:6840–6845. doi:10.1073/pnas.1800672115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Grinter R,
    2. Josts I,
    3. Mosbahi K,
    4. Roszak AW,
    5. Cogdell RJ,
    6. Bonvin AMJJ,
    7. Milner JJ,
    8. Kelly SM,
    9. Byron O,
    10. Smith BO,
    11. Walker D
    . 2016. Structure of the bacterial plant-ferredoxin receptor FusA. Nat Commun 7:6840–6845. doi:10.1038/ncomms1330.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Grinter R,
    2. Milner J,
    3. Walker D
    . 2012. Ferredoxin containing bacteriocins suggest a novel mechanism of iron uptake in Pectobacterium spp. PLoS One 7:e33033. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Grinter R,
    2. Josts I,
    3. Zeth K,
    4. Roszak AW,
    5. McCaughey LC,
    6. Cogdell RJ,
    7. Milner JJ,
    8. Kelly SM,
    9. Byron O,
    10. Walker D
    . 2014. Structure of the atypical bacteriocin pectocin M2 implies a novel mechanism of protein uptake. Mol Microbiol 93:234–246. doi:10.1111/mmi.12655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Grinter R,
    2. Hay ID,
    3. Song J,
    4. Wang J,
    5. Teng D,
    6. Dhanesakaran V,
    7. Wilksch JJ,
    8. Davies MR,
    9. Littler D,
    10. Beckham SA,
    11. Henderson IR,
    12. Strugnell RA,
    13. Dougan G,
    14. Lithgow T
    . 2018. FusC, a member of the M16 protease family acquired by bacteria for iron piracy against plants. PLoS Biol 16:e2006026. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Neupert W,
    2. Brunner M
    . 2002. The protein import motor of mitochondria. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3:555–565. doi:10.1038/nrm878.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Backes S,
    2. Herrmann JM
    . 2017. Protein translocation into the intermembrane space and matrix of mitochondria: mechanisms and driving forces. Front Mol Biosci 4:83. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2017.00083.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kasianowicz J,
    2. Benz R,
    3. McLaughlin S
    . 1984. The kinetic mechanism by which CCCP (carbonyl cyanidem-chlorophenylhydrazone) transports protons across membranes. J Membrain Biol 82:179–190. doi:10.1007/BF01868942.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Braud A,
    2. Hannauer M,
    3. Mislin GLA,
    4. Schalk IJ
    . 2009. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyochelin-iron uptake pathway and its metal specificity. J Bacteriol 191:3517–3525. doi:10.1128/JB.00010-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Shultis DD,
    2. Purdy MD,
    3. Banchs CN,
    4. Wiener MC
    . 2006. Outer membrane active transport: structure of the BtuB:TonB complex. Science 312:1396–1399. doi:10.1126/science.1127694.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ferguson AD
    . 2002. Structural basis of gating by the outer membrane transporter FecA. Science 295:1715–1719. doi:10.1126/science.1067313.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Cardoso de Amorim G,
    2. Prochnicka-Chalufour A,
    3. Delepelaire P,
    4. Lefèvre J,
    5. Simenel C,
    6. Wandersman C,
    7. Delepierre M,
    8. Izadi-Pruneyre N
    . 2013. The structure of HasB reveals a new class of TonB protein fold. PLoS One 8:e58964. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058964.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Peacock RS,
    2. Weljie AM,
    3. Howard SP,
    4. Price FD,
    5. Vogel HJ
    . 2005. The solution structure of the C-terminal domain of TonB and interaction studies with TonB box peptides. J Mol Biol 345:1185–1197. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Schauer K,
    2. Rodionov DA,
    3. de Reuse H
    . 2008. New substrates for TonB-dependent transport: do we only see the ‘tip of the iceberg’? Trends Biochem Sci 33:330–338. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2008.04.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. López CS,
    2. Peacock RS,
    3. Crosa JH,
    4. Vogel HJ
    . 2009. Molecular characterization of the TonB2 protein from the fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum. Biochem J 418:49–59. doi:10.1042/BJ20081462.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Paquelin A,
    2. Ghigo JM,
    3. Bertin S,
    4. Wandersman C
    . 2001. Characterization of HasB, a Serratia marcescens TonB-like protein specifically involved in the haemophore-dependent haem acquisition system. Mol Microbiol 42:995–1005. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02628.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Cascales E,
    2. Buchanan SK,
    3. Duché D,
    4. Kleanthous C,
    5. Lloubès R,
    6. Postle K,
    7. Riley M,
    8. Slatin S,
    9. Cavard D
    , 2007. Colicin biology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71:158–229. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00036-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Rooney WM,
    2. Wojnowska M,
    3. Walker D
    . 2019. Draft genome sequence of the necrotrophic plant-pathogenic bacterium Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum strain LMG 2410. Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e00614-19. doi:10.1128/MRA.00614-19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Datsenko KA,
    2. Wanner BL
    . 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:6640–6645. doi:10.1073/pnas.120163297.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Waldo GS,
    2. Standish BM,
    3. Berendzen J,
    4. Terwilliger TC
    . 1999. Rapid protein-folding assay using green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 17:691–695. doi:10.1038/10904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
FusB Energizes Import across the Outer Membrane through Direct Interaction with Its Ferredoxin Substrate
Marta Wojnowska, Daniel Walker
mBio Oct 2020, 11 (5) e02081-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02081-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FusB Energizes Import across the Outer Membrane through Direct Interaction with Its Ferredoxin Substrate
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
FusB Energizes Import across the Outer Membrane through Direct Interaction with Its Ferredoxin Substrate
Marta Wojnowska, Daniel Walker
mBio Oct 2020, 11 (5) e02081-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02081-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Pectobacterium
TonB
ferredoxin
outer membrane
plant pathogens
plant-microbe interactions
protein transport

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511