Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Molecular Biology and Physiology

Gcn5p and Ubp8p Affect Protein Ubiquitylation and Cell Proliferation by Altering the Fermentative/Respiratory Flux Balance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Antonella De Palma, Giulia Fanelli, Elisabetta Cretella, Veronica De Luca, Raffaele Antonio Palladino, Valentina Panzeri, Valentina Roffia, Michele Saliola, Pierluigi Mauri, Patrizia Filetici
Sang Yup Lee, Editor
Antonella De Palma
aProteomics and Metabolomics Unit, Institute for Biomedical Technologies (ITB-CNR), Segrate, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giulia Fanelli
bInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology/CNR, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
cDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies Charles Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabetta Cretella
bInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology/CNR, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
cDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies Charles Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Veronica De Luca
bInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology/CNR, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raffaele Antonio Palladino
bInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology/CNR, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valentina Panzeri
aProteomics and Metabolomics Unit, Institute for Biomedical Technologies (ITB-CNR), Segrate, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valentina Roffia
aProteomics and Metabolomics Unit, Institute for Biomedical Technologies (ITB-CNR), Segrate, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Saliola
cDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies Charles Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierluigi Mauri
aProteomics and Metabolomics Unit, Institute for Biomedical Technologies (ITB-CNR), Segrate, Italy
dInstitute of Life Sciences, School of Advanced Studies Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pierluigi Mauri
Patrizia Filetici
bInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology/CNR, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sang Yup Lee
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01504-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Expression and purification of His6-Ub proteins in S. cerevisiae. (A) Schematic protocol for the expression of His6Ub proteins in strains containing pDJ421 (41). Red oval, origin of replication; blue rectangle, pCUP promoter (LEU cassette). His6-Ub was expressed in CuSO4, purified through an Ni+ column, and analyzed by MS after trypsinization. (B) Western blot analysis showing the eluate of His6-Ub proteins with respect to the controls hybridized with anti-His6 antibody. Total lysates were probed with anti-Ada2p antibody as an internal standard. (C) Venn diagram of Ub protein distributions found in WT (blue), ubp8Δ (yellow), gcn5Δ (green), and ubp8Δ gcn5Δ (pink) strains. The areas of intersection contain proteins common to different strains. The 113 proteins absent in the WT are highlighted by a dashed circle.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Interactome networks built using STRING database through the mapping of the 103 differentially expressed Ub proteins identified comparing ubp8Δ, gcn5Δ, and ubp8Δ gcn5Δ strains versus the WT condition. The color code of distinct nodes represents the DAve value and the relevant chromatic scale (reported in the figure) and ranges from −2.00 to 0 (dark blue to white) and from 0 to +2.00 (white to dark red). Proteins with DAve (ratio of protein expression) ≥ l0.4l and a DCI (confidence of differential expression) ≥ l5l pass the filters and could be considered differentially expressed in the considered comparison. Positive DAve values indicate proteins down-expressed in mutant strains, while negative DAve values indicate proteins up-expressed in mutant strains. The differentially expressed proteins resulting from the three most interesting pairwise comparisons (WT/ubp8Δ, WT/gcn5Δ, and WT/ubp8Δ and gcn5Δ) have been plotted on a protein-protein interaction network built by means of STRING database (https://string-db.org) (16). Experimentally and computationally predicted interactions were considered for network construction, setting a confidence score of 0.4. Proteins are represented as colored nodes based on their DAve value and highlighted by gray edges; protein-protein interactions are clustered with respect to the functional pathway.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Major glycolytic enzymes are differentially ubiquitylated in the absence of Gcn5p and Ubp8p. (A) Glycolytic pathway in S. cerevisiae. Enzymes are indicated according to the ubiquitylation color code in Fig. 2B. The color code palette found in ubp8Δ, gcn5Δ, and ubp8Δ gcn5Δ strains is compared to WT for the indicated enzymes. (C) RT-qPCR of PFK1, PFK2, and PYC1 mRNA expression respect to actin in WT, ubp8Δ, and gcn5Δ strains. (D) Ubiquitylation pattern of Pfk1p the essential enzyme required for initiation of glycolytic flux. His6Ub-Pfk1pmyc version (∼120 kDa) was analyzed by Western blotting in the indicated strains hybridized with anti-myc and anti-tubulin (55 kDa) as internal loading control. The lower panel shows the eluted profiles of His6Ub-Pfk1pmyc in different strains.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Loss of Gcn5p and Ubp8p causes defects in glycolysis with poor growth in low sugar. (A) Serial dilutions (1:10) of the indicated strains grown for several days on medium containing high (2%) and low (0.1%) glucose show defects in the absence of Gcn5p, Ubp8p, and both not rescued by the addition of lactate and ethanol. (B) Growth of liquid cultures in 2% (black) and 0.1% glucose (white) of WT, ubp8Δ gcn5Δ, and ubp8Δ gcn5Δ strains. (C) Alcohol dehydrogenase activities of ADH1 and ADH2 stained by a native in-gel assay in the indicated strains grown in 2 and 0.2% glucose for 30, 60, and 90 h, respectively. G6PDHp staining shown as an internal standard. Schematics on the left show the compositions of Adh1p (gray) and Adh2p (orange) homo- and heterotetramers (44). (D) Glucose consumption (g) per 1 OD600 of cells of indicated strains.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Metabolic effects on glycolysis in the absence of Gcn5p and Ubp8p. The model shows enzymes whose ubiquitylation is altered in the absence of Gcn5p and Ubp8p and possible routes redirecting glycolytic flux toward fermentation, gluconeogenesis/anaplerotic routes, or a pentose phosphate shunt according to the altered redox balance of the mutants. The partial reoxidation of the cytosolic NADH by the mitochondrial transdehydrogenase Nde1p in gcn5Δ is deduced by the contemporary presence of Adh1p and Adh2p in high glucose medium.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • TABLE 1

    Significant changes in S. cerevisiae Ub-proteome of the three mutant strains, as determined by proteomic analysisa

    TABLE 1
    • ↵a Differentially expressed proteins resulted from the MAProMa comparison of ubp8Δ, gcn5Δ, and ubp8Δ gcn5Δ strains versus the WT. In particular, each protein is marked by a color code, which is defined by the DAve value obtained in the three examined comparisons. The color is assigned according to a chromatic scale representing the confidence ranges of DAve values adopted (−2.00 to 0 [from blue to white] and +2.00 to 0 [from red to white]). Positive DAve values indicate proteins down-expressed in mutant strains, while negative DAve values indicate proteins up-expressed in mutant strains. The molecular function, gene name, known physical (P) and/or genetic (G) interactions with Ubp8p and/or Gcn5p, and the name of the human orthologues are indicated. Yeast genes corresponding to human pathologies are indicated in green. The complete list of the reported proteins was extracted from the differential lists shown in Table S2 in the supplemental material.

  • TABLE 2

    Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains derived from isogenic W303

    TABLE 2

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • TABLE S1

    Complete list of Ub proteins detected in WT, ubp8Δ, gcn5Δ, and ubp8Δ gcn5Δ S. cerevisiae strains. Download Table S1, XLS file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 De Palma et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    Complete list of differentially expressed Ub proteins resulted from the MAProMa comparison of ubp8Δ, gcn5Δ, and ubp8Δ gcn5Δ strains versus the WT condition. Download Table S2, XLS file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 De Palma et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S1

    Growth curves (filled circles) of indicated strains in high glucose (2%) are diagrammed with measures (open circles) of glucose (in g/liter) consumed at increasing times (in h) in the same strains. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.5 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 De Palma et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Gcn5p and Ubp8p Affect Protein Ubiquitylation and Cell Proliferation by Altering the Fermentative/Respiratory Flux Balance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Antonella De Palma, Giulia Fanelli, Elisabetta Cretella, Veronica De Luca, Raffaele Antonio Palladino, Valentina Panzeri, Valentina Roffia, Michele Saliola, Pierluigi Mauri, Patrizia Filetici
mBio Aug 2020, 11 (4) e01504-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01504-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gcn5p and Ubp8p Affect Protein Ubiquitylation and Cell Proliferation by Altering the Fermentative/Respiratory Flux Balance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Gcn5p and Ubp8p Affect Protein Ubiquitylation and Cell Proliferation by Altering the Fermentative/Respiratory Flux Balance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Antonella De Palma, Giulia Fanelli, Elisabetta Cretella, Veronica De Luca, Raffaele Antonio Palladino, Valentina Panzeri, Valentina Roffia, Michele Saliola, Pierluigi Mauri, Patrizia Filetici
mBio Aug 2020, 11 (4) e01504-20; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01504-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

ubiquitylation
Gcn5p
Ubp8p
glycolytic flux
sugar utilization

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511