Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Therapeutics and Prevention

Novel Cassette Assay To Quantify the Outer Membrane Permeability of Five β-Lactams Simultaneously in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae

Tae Hwan Kim, Xun Tao, Bartolome Moya, Yuanyuan Jiao, Kari B. Basso, Jieqiang Zhou, Yinzhi Lang, Dhruvitkumar S. Sutaria, Alexandre P. Zavascki, Afonso L. Barth, Stephanie M. Reeve, Herbert P. Schweizer, Deanna Deveson Lucas, John D. Boyce, Robert A. Bonomo, Richard E. Lee, Beom Soo Shin, Arnold Louie, George L. Drusano, Jürgen B. Bulitta
Steven J. Projan, Editor
Tae Hwan Kim
aDepartments of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xun Tao
aDepartments of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bartolome Moya
aDepartments of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Bartolome Moya
Yuanyuan Jiao
aDepartments of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kari B. Basso
bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jieqiang Zhou
aDepartments of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yinzhi Lang
aDepartments of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dhruvitkumar S. Sutaria
aDepartments of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandre P. Zavascki
cUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Afonso L. Barth
cUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
dLaboratório de Pesquisa em Resistência Bacteriana, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie M. Reeve
eDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Herbert P. Schweizer
fDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Emerging Pathogens Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deanna Deveson Lucas
gInfection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John D. Boyce
gInfection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John D. Boyce
Robert A. Bonomo
hMedical Service and GRECC, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
iDepartments of Medicine, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Biochemistry, and Proteomics and Bioinformatics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
jCWRU–Cleveland VAMC Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Epidemiology (Case VA CARES), Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard E. Lee
eDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beom Soo Shin
kSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnold Louie
lInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George L. Drusano
lInstitute for Therapeutic Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jürgen B. Bulitta
aDepartments of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jürgen B. Bulitta
Steven J. Projan
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.03189-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Concentration-time profiles of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam for the cassette assay of the polymyxin-susceptible E. cloacae isolate EC3800. β-Lactams were dosed at 3 mg/liter of each drug for the supernatant control and at 1, 3, or 10 mg/liter of each drug for intact bacteria arms (A to E). (F) Bacterial density (3.2 × 109 cells/ml) after six washes and immediately before adding the antibiotics to the intact cell arms. β-Lactams were dosed at 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/liter of each drug for lysed bacteria arms (G to K). (L) Bacterial density (6.4 × 108 cells/ml) after the washes and immediately before lysing. The data (Table 1) represent biological triplicates. The individual profiles for all replicates are presented in the supplemental material.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Concentration-time profiles of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam for the cassette assay of the polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae isolate KP3800. β-Lactams were dosed at 3 mg/liter of each drug for the supernatant control and at 1, 3, or 10 mg/liter of each drug for intact bacteria arms (A to E). (F) Bacterial density (9.0 × 108 cells/ml) after six washes and immediately before adding the antibiotics to the intact cell arms. β-Lactams were dosed at 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/liter of each drug for lysed bacteria arms (G to K). (L) Bacterial density (1.8 × 108 cells/ml) after the washes and immediately before lysing. The data (Table 1) represent biological triplicates. The individual profiles for all replicates are presented in the supplemental material.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Concentration-time profiles of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam for the discrete assay of the polymyxin-susceptible E. cloacae isolate EC3800. β-Lactams were dosed at 3 mg/liter of each drug for the supernatant control and at 1, 3, or 10 mg/liter of each drug for intact bacteria arms (A to E). (F) Bacterial density (6.3 × 108 for imipenem, 4.2 × 109 for meropenem, 3.6 × 109 for cefepime, 3.8 × 109 for aztreonam, and 3.5 × 109 for ceftazidime) after six washes and immediately before adding the antibiotic to the intact bacteria arms. β-Lactams were dosed at 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/liter of each drug for lysed bacteria arms (G to K). (L) Bacterial density (6.3 × 108 for imipenem, 8.4 × 108 for meropenem, 7.2 × 108 for cefepime, 7.6 × 108 for aztreonam, and 7.0 × 108 for ceftazidime) after the washes and immediately before lysing. The data (Table 1) represent biological triplicates. The individual profiles for all replicates are presented in the supplemental material.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Concentration-time profiles of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam for the discrete assay of the polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae isolate KP3800. β-Lactams were dosed at 3 mg/liter each drug for the supernatant control and at 1, 3, or 10 mg/liter each drug for intact bacteria arms (A to E). (F) Bacterial density (1.1 × 108 for imipenem, 3.0 × 109 for meropenem, 9.5 × 108 for cefepime, 7.8 × 108 for aztreonam, and 7.5 × 108 for ceftazidime) after six washes and immediately before adding the antibiotic to the intact bacteria arms. β-Lactams were dosed at 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/liter each drug for lysed cells arms (G to K). (L) Bacterial density (1.1 × 108 for imipenem, 6.0 × 108 for meropenem, 1.9 × 108 for cefepime, 1.5 × 108 for aztreonam, and 1.6 × 108 for ceftazidime) after the washes and immediately before lysing. The data (Table 1) represent biological triplicates. The individual profiles for all replicates are presented in the supplemental material.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material
  • TABLE 1

    Outer membrane permeability coefficients for imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, aztreonam and ceftazidime for the polymyxin-susceptible E. cloacae (EC3800) and the polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae (KP3800) isolatesa

    TABLE 1
    • ↵a Data were determined via a discrete and a cassette assay, and additional cassette assay (“efflux”) studies were carried out with 25 mg/liter phenylalanine-arginine β-naphthylamide (PAβN) as an efflux pump inhibitor. Estimates represent averages from three biological replicates for the cassette and discrete assays and two biological replicates for efflux inhibitor assay. TSTD, too slow to be determined (for the initial inocula used; TSTD is equivalent to a permeability coefficient of <0.6 nm/s for the experiments with E. cloacae isolate and <3 nm/s for the K. pneumoniae isolate); NA, not quantifiable in this isolate due to insufficient hydrolysis of ceftazidime.

  • TABLE 2

    Protein production in strain ATCC 13833, a polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae isolate (KP3800), and a polymyxin-susceptible E. cloacae isolate (EC3800)

    TABLE 2

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • TABLE S1

    Predicted average unbound steady-state concentrations of five β-lactams in critically ill patients at the maximum clinical dose given as continuous infusion. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.03 MB.

    This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

  • FIG S1

    Concentration-time profiles of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, aztreonam, and ceftazidime for the cassette assay using the supernatant control (after 2 h of incubation) from the E. cloacae EC3800 (left) and the K. pneumoniae KP3800 (right) isolate. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.3 MB.

    This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

  • FIG S2

    Concentration-time profiles (left, second replicate; right, third replicate) of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam for the cassette assay using the E. cloacae EC3800 isolate. β-Lactams were dosed at 3 mg/liter of each drug for supernatant control and at 1, 3, or 10 mg/liter of each drug for intact bacteria arms (A to E). (F) Bacterial density (left, 3.6 × 109 cells/ml; right, 4.0 × 109 cells/ml) after six washes and immediately before adding the antibiotics to the intact cell arms. β-Lactams were dosed at 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/liter of each drug for lysed bacteria arms (G to K). (L) Bacterial density (left, 7.2 × 108 cells/ml; right, 8.0 × 108 cells/ml) after the washes and immediately before lysing. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.7 MB.

    This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

  • FIG S3

    Concentration-time profiles (left, second replicate; right, third replicate) of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam for the cassette assay using K. pneumoniae KP3800. β-Lactams were dosed at 3 mg/liter of each drug for supernatant control, and at 1, 3, or 10 mg/liter of each drug for intact bacteria arms (A to E); panel (F) shows the bacterial density (left: 8.0 × 108 cells/ml; right: 1.05 × 109 cells/ml) after six washes and immediately before adding the antibiotics to the intact cell arms. β-Lactams were dosed at 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/liter of each drug for lysed bacteria arms (G to K); panel (L) shows the bacterial density (left: 1.6 × 108 cells/ml; right: 2.1 × 108 cells/ml) after the washes and immediately before lysing. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.7 MB.

    This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

  • FIG S4

    Concentration-time profiles (left, second replicate; right, third replicate) of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime and aztreonam for the discrete assay using E. cloacae EC3800. β-Lactams were dosed at 3 mg/liter of each drug for supernatant control, and at 1, 3, or 10 mg/liter of each drug for intact bacteria arms (A to E). (F) Bacterial density (left, 5.1 × 108 for imipenem, 3.0 × 109 for meropenem, 3.4 × 109 for cefepime, 4.0 × 109 for aztreonam, and 3.9 × 109 for ceftazidime; right, 5.4 × 108 for imipenem, 2.7 × 109 for meropenem, 3.5 × 109 for cefepime, 3.5 × 109 for aztreonam, and 3.5 × 109 for ceftazidime) after six washes and immediately before adding the antibiotic to the intact cell arms. β-Lactams were dosed at 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/liter of each drug for lysed bacteria arms (G to K). (L) Bacterial density (left, 5.1 × 108 for imipenem, 6.0 × 108 for meropenem, 6.8 × 108 for cefepime, 8.0 × 108 for aztreonam, and 7.8 × 108 for ceftazidime; right, 5.4 × 108 for imipenem, 5.4 × 108 for meropenem, 7.0 × 108 for cefepime, 7.0 × 108 for aztreonam, and 7.0 × 108 for ceftazidime) after the washes and immediately before lysing. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 1.7 MB.

    This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

  • FIG S5

    Concentration-time profiles (left, second replicate; right, third replicate) of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam for the discrete assay using the K. pneumoniae KP3800 isolate. β-Lactams were dosed at 3 mg/liter of each drug for supernatant control, and at 1, 3, or 10 mg/liter of each drug for intact bacteria arms (A to E). (F) Bacterial density (left, 1.3 × 108 for imipenem, 1.0 × 109 for meropenem, 7.5 × 108 for cefepime, 8.0 × 108 for aztreonam, and 9.0 × 108 for ceftazidime; right, 1.3 × 108 for imipenem, 7.5 × 108 for meropenem, 7.0 × 108 for cefepime, 7.0 × 108 for aztreonam, and 6.0 × 108 for ceftazidime) after six washes and immediately before adding the antibiotic to the intact cell arms. β-Lactams were dosed at 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/liter of each drug for lysed bacteria arms (G to K). (L) Bacterial density (left, 1.3 × 108 for imipenem, 2.0 × 108 for meropenem, 1.5 × 108 for cefepime, 1.6 × 108 for aztreonam, and 1.8 × 108 for ceftazidime; right, 1.3 × 108 for imipenem, 1.5 × 108 for meropenem, 1.4 × 108 for cefepime, 1.4 × 108 for aztreonam, and 1.2 × 108 for ceftazidime) after the washes and immediately before lysing. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 1.7 MB.

    This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

  • FIG S6

    Concentration-time profiles (left, first replicate; right, second replicate) of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam for the cassette assay (with 25 mg/liter PAβN) using E. cloacae EC3800 . β-Lactams were dosed at 3 mg/liter of each drug for supernatant control and at 1, 3, or 10 mg/liter of each drug for intact bacteria arms (A to E). (F) Bacterial density (left, 3.0 × 109 cells/ml; right, 2.75 × 109 cells/ml) after six washes and immediately before adding the antibiotics to the intact cell arms. β-Lactams were dosed at 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/liter of each drug for lysed bacteria arms (G to K). (L) Bacterial density (left, 6.0 × 108 cells/ml; right, 5.5 × 108 cells/ml) after the washes and immediately before lysing. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 1.8 MB.

    This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

  • FIG S7

    Concentration-time profiles (left, first replicate; right, second replicate) of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam for the cassette assay (with 25 mg/liter PAβN) using K. pneumoniae KP3800. β-Lactams were dosed at 3 mg/liter of each drug for supernatant control and at 1, 3, or 10 mg/liter of each drug for intact bacteria arms (A to E). (F) Bacterial density (left, 9.0 × 108 cells/ml; right, 8.0 × 108 cells/ml) after six washes and immediately before adding the antibiotics to the intact cell arms. β-Lactams were dosed at 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/liter of each drug for lysed bacteria arms (G to K). (L) Bacterial density (left, 1.8 × 108 cells/ml; right, 1.6 × 108 cells/ml) after the washes and immediately before lysing. Download FIG S7, TIF file, 1.9 MB.

    This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

  • TABLE S2

    Outer membrane permeability coefficients (nm/s) for imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, aztreonam and ceftazidime for three KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae. Data were determined via a discrete assay. Estimates represent the average ± the SD from three biological replicates for and KP3800 and a single biological assay for KP6478 and KP6484 (for the latter two strains, the employed MgCl2 concentration was 0.52 mM and the CaCl2 concentration 0.62 mM; in total 1.14 mM for these divalent cations). Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.

    This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

  • FIG S8

    Relative gene expression for two clinical, carbapenem-resistant isolates of E. cloacae (EC3800, grey colony) and K. pneumoniae (KP3800, white colony). The RNA extraction was performed under the same biological conditions as the samples obtained for proteomic analysis. Relative expression was normalized to that of K. pneumoniae strain ATCC 13883. Six biological replicates and two technical replicates (i.e., a total of 12 runs) were performed. *, For the calculation of blaKPC-2 a consensus value of 1 was used for the K. pneumoniae strain ATCC 13883. The primer sequences (5′ to 3′) used in this study were GCAATATTCTGGCAGTGGTGATC for RT-ompK35-F1, ACCATTTTTCCATAGAAGTCCAGT for RT-ompK35-R1, TTAAAGTACTGTCCCTCCTGG for RT-ompK36-F1, TCAGAGAAGTAGTGCAGACCGTCA for RT-ompK36-R1, CGTGACGGAAAGCTTACAAA for RT-KPC-F1, AGCCAATCAACAAACTGCTG for RT-KPC-R1, TCAAACCAGGTGTGCAGGTA for RT-acrB-F, TTAATACCCAGACCGGATGC for RT-acrB-R, AAGGCGTTCATTCTACCACC for RT-mgrB-F, TTAAGAAGGCCGTGCTATCC for RT-mgrB-R, TTGACGTTACCCGCAGAAGAA for RT-rrsE-F, and GCTTGCACCCTCCGTATTACC for RT-rrsE-R. Download FIG S8, TIF file, 0.2 MB.

    This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Novel Cassette Assay To Quantify the Outer Membrane Permeability of Five β-Lactams Simultaneously in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae
Tae Hwan Kim, Xun Tao, Bartolome Moya, Yuanyuan Jiao, Kari B. Basso, Jieqiang Zhou, Yinzhi Lang, Dhruvitkumar S. Sutaria, Alexandre P. Zavascki, Afonso L. Barth, Stephanie M. Reeve, Herbert P. Schweizer, Deanna Deveson Lucas, John D. Boyce, Robert A. Bonomo, Richard E. Lee, Beom Soo Shin, Arnold Louie, George L. Drusano, Jürgen B. Bulitta
mBio Feb 2020, 11 (1) e03189-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.03189-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel Cassette Assay To Quantify the Outer Membrane Permeability of Five β-Lactams Simultaneously in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Novel Cassette Assay To Quantify the Outer Membrane Permeability of Five β-Lactams Simultaneously in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae
Tae Hwan Kim, Xun Tao, Bartolome Moya, Yuanyuan Jiao, Kari B. Basso, Jieqiang Zhou, Yinzhi Lang, Dhruvitkumar S. Sutaria, Alexandre P. Zavascki, Afonso L. Barth, Stephanie M. Reeve, Herbert P. Schweizer, Deanna Deveson Lucas, John D. Boyce, Robert A. Bonomo, Richard E. Lee, Beom Soo Shin, Arnold Louie, George L. Drusano, Jürgen B. Bulitta
mBio Feb 2020, 11 (1) e03189-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.03189-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Enterobacter cloacae
Klebsiella pneumoniae
LC-MS/MS
beta-lactams
carbapenem resistance
carbapenems
cassette assay
cephalosporins
monobactams
outer membrane
permeability
polymyxin resistance

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511