Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Molecular Biology and Physiology

A CRISPR Interference System for Efficient and Rapid Gene Knockdown in Caulobacter crescentus

Mathilde Guzzo, Lennice K. Castro, Christopher R. Reisch, Monica S. Guo, Michael T. Laub
Erin D. Goley, Invited Editor, Arash Komeili, Editor
Mathilde Guzzo
aDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mathilde Guzzo
Lennice K. Castro
aDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher R. Reisch
aDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monica S. Guo
aDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael T. Laub
aDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
bHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael T. Laub
Erin D. Goley
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Roles: Invited Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arash Komeili
University of California, Berkeley
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02415-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    CRISPRi systems to downregulate gene expression in Caulobacter crescentus. (A) Design of the different constructs used in this study. Each system consists of a nuclease-dead variant of the cas9 gene (dcas9) expressed under the control of a xylose (or vanillate) promoter and the corresponding specific single guide RNA (sgRNA) constitutively expressed (see Materials and Methods). (B) Efficiency of downregulating ctrA expression using the different CRISPRi systems from S. pyogenes, S. thermophilus CRISPR3, and S. pasteurianus. Shown are serial dilutions of each strain on PYE supplemented with 0.2% glucose or 0.3% xylose after 48 h at 30°C. Note that the commonly used S. pyogenes system is not functional in C. crescentus, although it targets the same sequence as the S. pasteurianus system here. Strand and sequence targeting of the different sgRNAs is detailed in Fig. S1A. (C) Strand and sequence targeting of the different sgRNAs for gcrA used in panel D. TSS, transcription start site; T, template; NT, nontemplate. (D) Efficiency of downregulating gcrA expression when targeting the nontemplate strand using dCas9 derived from S. thermophilus CRISPR3 and S. pasteurianus. Shown are serial dilutions of each strain on PYE supplemented with 0.2% glucose or 0.3% xylose after 48 h at 30°C. (E) Efficiency of downregulating ctrA expression with the dCas9 of S. thermophilus CRISPR3 under a vanillate-inducible promoter. Shown are serial dilutions of each strain on PYE or PYE supplemented with 500 μM vanillate after 48 h at 30°C.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Downregulation of ctrA and gcrA expression in asynchronous populations of cells using the Sth3 CRISPRi system. (A) ctrA (left) and gcrA (right) mRNA levels measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to rpoA levels. (B) CtrA (left) and GcrA (right) protein levels with and without induction of the CRISPRi system. Graphs show quantifications of CtrA or GcrA protein band intensity normalized to RpoA protein band intensity. (C) Flow cytometry profiles showing the DNA content of a mixed population of cells at different time points after induction or not of the ctrA-targeting CRISPRi system. (D) Phase-contrast images of cells 120 (top) or 240 (bottom) min after induction or not of dcas9 alone or in combination with the ctrA- or gcrA-sgRNA, as indicated. Bar, 2 μm.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Repression of ctrA expression by CRISPRi leads to misregulation of CtrA-regulated genes. Expression changes of CtrA-regulated genes in cells expressing dcas9 and the ctrA-sgRNA (+ xyl) compared to the noninducing condition (+ glu). Column 1, after 2 h by RNA-seq; columns 2 to 4, at t = 0, after 2 h, or after 4 h by microarray. As a control, expression changes of CtrA-regulated genes in the ctrA(V148F)ts strain compared to wild type (wt) are shown in columns 5 to 7 (23, 24).

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Downregulation of ctrA and gcrA expression in synchronized cells. (A) Schematic of CtrA and GcrA abundance during the Caulobacter cell cycle. (B) Normalized ctrA expression in synchronized cells after induction of the CRISPRi system at t = 0 min after synchronization or t = 20 min before synchronization. (C) CtrA protein levels in synchronized cells after induction of CRISPRi system at the same times as indicated for panel B. (D) Flow cytometry profiles after SYTOX staining showing DNA content of synchronized cells when targeting ctrA. (E) Normalized gcrA expression in synchronized cells after induction of the CRISPRi system at t = 20 or 40 min before synchronization. (F) GcrA protein levels in synchronized cells after induction of CRISPRi system at the same times as indicated for panel E. (G) Flow cytometry profiles after SYTOX staining showing DNA content of synchronized cells when targeting gcrA.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Dual targeting of cpaA and blaA with CRISPRi. (A) Assay to assess sensitivity to phage ΦCbK. Downregulation of the prepilin peptidase gene cpaA confers resistance to the ΦCbK. Phage dilutions were spotted on a lawn of C. crescentus on PYE supplemented with kanamycin and 0.2% glucose or 0.3% xylose. (B) Growth inhibition assay to assess sensitivity to carbenicillin. Downregulation of the β-lactamase gene blaA enhances sensitivity to carbenicillin. Pictures on the left show the zone of growth inhibition (dark zone) surrounding carbenicillin-soaked disks for each indicated strain grown on PYE supplemented with kanamycin and 0.2% glucose or 0.3% xylose. The graph on the right represents the average diameter of inhibition normalized to wild type (WT), measured on n = 6 replicates from n = 2 biological replicates for each strain.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • FIG S1

    Controls for assessing CRISPRi systems to downregulate gene expression in Caulobacter crescentus. (A) Strand and sequence targeting of the different ctrA-sgRNAs used in Fig. 1B. TSS, transcription start site; T, template; NT, nontemplate. (B) Serial dilutions of the ctrA401ts control spotted on PYE plates incubated for 48 hours at 30°C or 37°C where indicated. (C) Expression of the sgRNAs targeting ctrA or gcrA do not affect cell viability in cells lacking the dCas9 protein. Shown are spotting of serial dilutions of each strain on PYE supplemented with 0.2% glucose or 0.3% xylose after 48 hours at 30°C. (D) Serial dilutions of the ΔgcrA Pvan-gcrA strain spotted on PYE plates supplemented with 500 μM vanillate where indicated and incubated for 48 hours at 30°C. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 2.6 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Guzzo et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Loss-of-function phenotypes for cells lacking CtrA or GcrA. (A) Flow cytometry profiles showing the DNA content of a mixed population of ctrA401ts cells at different time points. t = 0 corresponds to when cells were split for growth at 30 and 37°C. (B) Phase-contrast images of cells 120 min after shifting to 37°C for the ctrA401ts strain (top) or after washing away the vanillate for the ΔgcrA Pvan-gcrA strain (bottom), as indicated, leading to cell elongation in both cases. Bar, 2 μm. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 2.3 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Guzzo et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    Off-target effects of the Sth3 CRISPRi system. Log2 fold changes in gene expression for the ctrA-sgRNA strain in xylose versus glucose compared to the dcas9-only strain in xylose versus glucose. The effects on ctrA (pink) and the 40 genes that exhibit the largest gene expression changes following induction of ctrA-sgRNA (orange) are shown (Table S1). The dashed line demarcates where gene expression changes are equal between the ctrA-sgRNA and the dcas9-only strain. Genes that are induced or repressed in the ctrA-sgRNA strain but lie along the dashed line are genes whose expression changes are dependent on the shift from glucose to xylose. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 2.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Guzzo et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S1

    Top 40 most affected genes following CRISPRi downregulation of ctrA. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.02 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Guzzo et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    Analysis of sgRNA target sequences. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Guzzo et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S3

    Strains, plasmids, and primers used. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Guzzo et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S4

    List of all Caulobacter nontemplate-strand sgRNAs. Download Table S4, XLSX file, 0.6 MB.

    Copyright © 2020 Guzzo et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
A CRISPR Interference System for Efficient and Rapid Gene Knockdown in Caulobacter crescentus
Mathilde Guzzo, Lennice K. Castro, Christopher R. Reisch, Monica S. Guo, Michael T. Laub
mBio Jan 2020, 11 (1) e02415-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02415-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A CRISPR Interference System for Efficient and Rapid Gene Knockdown in Caulobacter crescentus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A CRISPR Interference System for Efficient and Rapid Gene Knockdown in Caulobacter crescentus
Mathilde Guzzo, Lennice K. Castro, Christopher R. Reisch, Monica S. Guo, Michael T. Laub
mBio Jan 2020, 11 (1) e02415-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02415-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

CRISPR
Cas9
Caulobacter crescentus
gene knockdown

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511