Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

The Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein Regulates Quorum Sensing and Global Gene Expression in Yersinia pestis during Planktonic Growth and Growth in Biofilms

Jeremy T. Ritzert, George Minasov, Ryan Embry, Matthew J. Schipma, Karla J. F. Satchell
Jeff F. Miller, Editor
Jeremy T. Ritzert
aDepartment of Microbiology-Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Minasov
aDepartment of Microbiology-Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
bCenter for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Embry
cCenter for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew J. Schipma
cCenter for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karla J. F. Satchell
aDepartment of Microbiology-Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
bCenter for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karla J. F. Satchell
Jeff F. Miller
UCLA School of Medicine
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02613-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (Crp) is an important transcriptional regulator of Yersinia pestis. Expression of crp increases during pneumonic plague as the pathogen depletes glucose and forms large biofilms within lungs. To better understand control of Y. pestis Crp, we determined a 1.8-Å crystal structure of the protein-cAMP complex. We found that compared to Escherichia coli Crp, C helix amino acid substitutions in Y. pestis Crp did not impact the cAMP dependency of Crp to bind DNA promoters. To investigate Y. pestis Crp-regulated genes during plague pneumonia, we performed RNA sequencing on both wild-type and Δcrp mutant bacteria growing in planktonic and biofilm states in minimal media with glucose or glycerol. Y. pestis Crp was found to dramatically alter expression of hundreds of genes in a manner dependent upon carbon source and growth state. Gel shift assays confirmed direct regulation of the malT and ptsG promoters, and Crp was then linked to Y. pestis growth on maltose as a sole carbon source. Iron regulation genes ybtA and fyuA were found to be indirectly regulated by Crp. A new connection between carbon source and quorum sensing was revealed as Crp was found to regulate production of acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) through direct and indirect regulation of genes for AHL synthetases and receptors. AHLs were subsequently identified in the lungs of Y. pestis-infected mice when crp expression was highest in Y. pestis biofilms. Thus, in addition to the well-studied pla gene, other Crp-regulated genes likely have important functions during plague infection.

IMPORTANCE Bacterial pathogens have evolved extensive signaling pathways to translate environmental signals into changes in gene expression. While Crp has long been appreciated for its role in regulating metabolism of carbon sources in many bacterial species, transcriptional profiling has revealed that this protein regulates many other aspects of bacterial physiology. The plague pathogen Y. pestis requires this global regulator to survive in blood, skin, and lungs. During disease progression, this organism adapts to changes within these niches. In addition to regulating genes for metabolism of nonglucose sugars, we found that Crp regulates genes for virulence, metal acquisition, and quorum sensing by direct or indirect mechanisms. Thus, this single transcriptional regulator, which responds to changes in available carbon sources, can regulate multiple critical behaviors for causing disease.

INTRODUCTION

Yersinia pestis is the etiological agent of pneumonic, bubonic, and septicemic plague. While cases of plague are rare, Y. pestis evolved to adapt to environmental changes encountered during its life cycle in fleas, rodents, and mammals, including humans (1). The flea, buboes (lymph nodes), blood, and lungs differ in temperature, nutrients, and defense systems. To interpret changes in these environments, Y. pestis encodes more than two dozen two-component systems (2), three quorum sensing systems (3), and additional transcriptional regulators with specialized functions. This sensor network allows Y. pestis to translate changes in its extracellular environment into altered gene expression to promote growth and pathogenesis (4, 5).

The 3′,5′-cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (Crp) is required for Y. pestis virulence in mice (6). Crp is a 23.5-kDa transcriptional regulator that forms a dimer after binding its cAMP ligand (7). Dimerization allows activation or repression of gene expression by binding to the promoter region of its target genes (8). The activity of adenylate cyclase (CyaA) regulates intracellular concentrations of cAMP via the conversion of ATP into cAMP. This activity is increased at 37°C compared to lower temperatures, suggesting that cAMP-Crp signaling is important during mammalian infection (9, 10). In addition, phosphorylated EIIA from the phosphotransferase system activates CyaA when glucose is absent (11). During catabolite repression, the transport of glucose through PtsG depletes intracellular concentrations of phosphorylated EIIA as the phosphate group is transferred to the incoming glucose molecule.

While known for its role during catabolite repression and regulation of the lac operon, it is now appreciated that Crp regulates expression of other genes, including factors important during infection, to connect changes in glucose availability to regulation of bacterial behaviors. Across gammaproteobacteria, Crp regulates biofilm formation (12, 13), capsule production (14), the DNA damage response (15), toxin production (16, 17), luminescence (18), and iron acquisition (19).

Other proteins can regulate expression of the crp gene, suggesting that multiple input signals modulate expression of the Crp regulon. The two-component system PhoPQ and the small RNA (sRNA) chaperone Hfq regulate crp in Y. pestis (6, 20, 21). In turn, Crp regulates expression of the type III secretion system and the Pla protease essential for pneumonic plague (22–24). Crp also promotes biofilm formation via a mechanism involving the RNA-binding regulatory protein CsrA (13). Production of the main constituent of biofilms, poly-N-acetylglucosamine, is increased at 37°C in fully virulent strains of Y. pestis, suggesting additional roles for biofilm formation during mammalian infection (25). Further, we recently demonstrated increased expression of crp within biofilms in the lungs of Y. pestis-infected mice (26), revealing a link between in vivo biofilms, glucose availability, and essential virulence gene expression.

In this study, we utilized global transcriptional profiling of planktonic and biofilm states in the presence of glucose and glycerol to reveal previously unrecognized Crp-regulated genes in Y. pestis. We found that Crp indirectly represses genes required for siderophore biosynthesis and stimulates genes for carbohydrate uptake and metabolism, particularly for the use of maltose as an alternative carbon source. Unexpectedly, Crp was found to promote expression of the acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) quorum sensing genes. Crp directly binds to the promoter of the AHL receptor, ypeR, and thereby controls efficient production of AHLs within biofilms.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Experimental setup.Pneumonic plague is a biphasic disease consisting of an early noninflammatory phase and a damaging proinflammatory phase (27). As pneumonia develops, the lungs fill with Y. pestis, neutrophils, and fluid (Fig. 1A). Y. pestis proliferates to ∼109 CFU, forms large biofilms in the lungs, and consumes all available glucose in the process. The declining concentration of glucose activates expression of crp within biofilms (26). Expression of the Crp-activated gene pla, which is required for Y. pestis to grow within the lungs and disseminate to other organs, also increases (22). To better understand the changes in the lung environment, we sought to identify additional Crp-regulated genes dependent upon growth in biofilms and under glucose-limiting conditions.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Experimental setup for RNA-seq. (A) Diagram of changes during progression of pneumonic plague. Blue hexagons represent glucose. Black and green bacilli represent wild-type Y. pestis and Y. pestis expressing crp in biofilms, respectively. (B) Culture (10 ml) of Y. pestis grown in TMH medium for 18 h at 37°C showing the biofilm formed at the air-liquid interface. RNA was isolated from wild-type Y. pestis or Y. pestis Δcrp cultures grown in TMH medium with 0.2% glucose or glycerol in triplicate under the described conditions. (C) Intracellular concentrations of cAMP in wild-type Y. pestis, Y. pestis Δcrp, or Y. pestis ΔcyaA grown for 6 h in TMH medium with 0.2% glucose (black bars) or glycerol (white bars) at 37°C or 26°C as indicated. n.d. = not done. (D) Intracellular concentrations of cAMP in Y. pestis, Y. pestis Δcrp, or Y. pestis ΔcyaA grown for 18 h in TMH medium with 0.2% glucose or glycerol in planktonic (black bars) or biofilm (white bars) states at 37°C. Data represent means and standard errors of the means (SEM) of results from three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 from Student's t test.

To recapitulate human infection conditions, Y. pestis was grown at 37°C with shaking in defined liquid culture media with glucose to mimic early pneumonia or with glycerol to mimic later infection after glucose is consumed. As the cultures were aerated by shaking, Y. pestis formed a biofilm at the air-liquid interface, thereby facilitating comparisons of levels of gene expression of the planktonic state representing early infection and the biofilm state of later infection (Fig. 1B). In addition, a Δcrp mutant was included in parallel to facilitate identification specifically of Crp-regulated genes under these conditions. The combined set of six experimental conditions allowed identification of glucose-, Crp-, and biofilm-dependent genes that may play a role during pneumonic plague infection.

Carbon source and growth state do not affect cAMP requirement for Crp binding to DNA.A potential concern with this experimental setup is that differences in expression of Crp-regulated genes could be affected by changes in the activity of CyaA and the phosphotransferase system (28), leading to differences in Crp activity rather than in expression of crp. To control for this possibility, we measured cAMP concentrations in Y. pestis under all experimental conditions. In contrast to the expected increase, we observed a decrease in cAMP concentrations in Y. pestis grown in glycerol (Fig. 1C). This was also reported in a study of Vibrio fischeri, in which intracellular cAMP levels were reduced but total concentrations of cAMP (including extracellular cAMP) were higher (29). Deletion of the cyaA adenylate cyclase gene reduced cAMP levels, while deletion of crp had no effect. cAMP concentrations were much higher in cells grown at 37°C versus 26°C, suggesting the importance of Crp regulation during mammalian infection. cAMP concentrations were not significantly affected in comparisons between plankton- and biofilm-grown cells (Fig. 1D). These data indicate that any changes in expression of Crp-regulated genes observed by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) would not be due to differences in the cAMP levels.

Another potential caveat concerning this experimental setup is the possibility that Crp could bind and regulate genes in Y. pestis entirely independently of cAMP. Earlier mutational studies on Escherichia coli showed that the specific double mutant variant T128L/S129I had extremely high cAMP-independent DNA binding affinity, comparable with the activity of cAMP-bound wild-type Crp (30). Y. pestis Crp shares 99% sequence homology with Crp from E. coli, with differences located on the C helix at positions 119, 123, and 127. We considered that the sequence differences might affect cAMP binding or dimerization and thus cause changes in DNA binding. To investigate this, we carried out structural studies using protein crystallography and solved the crystal structure of Y. pestis Crp in complex with cAMP. Crp was crystallized as a dimer, and each monomer had cAMP bound to the binding site (Fig. 2A). We compared the resulting structure to the structure of E. coli Crp bound to cAMP (PDB identifier [ID] 4R8H) (30). The structures aligned closely, with root mean square deviation (RMSD) values of 0.8 Å for 185 pruned Cα atom pairs and 1.1 Å for all 200 pairs (Fig. 2B). Notably, in the Y. pestis structure, C helix residues S119, N123, and I127 (unlike S129 in the constitutive binding mutant of E. coli Crp) are directed away from cAMP, suggesting that these altered amino acids should not impact cAMP binding (Fig. 2C). The side chain of residue N123 is involved in dimer formation and directly interacts with the side chain of E78 from another chain. The N123 exchange for arginine, which occurs in Y. pestis, disrupts this interaction, but the S119 replacement for alanine restores the hydrogen bond to E78; thus, these two mutations do not alter the stability of the dimer. V127 in Crp from E. coli is pointed away from dimerization interface, and it is not involved in the cAMP binding, so isoleucine at this position in Y. pestis does not have any impact that contributes to binding of cAMP or to dimer formation. As confirmation of our findings, an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) performed in the presence of cAMP (see Fig. 5A) indicated that Crp requires cAMP to bind a DNA fragment that corresponds to the pla promoter. This cAMP dependence is also consistent with studies of Crp from other Y. pestis isolates and from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (23, 31, 32).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

The structure of Y. pestis Crp closely aligns with that of E. coli Crp. (A) Structure (1.8-Å resolution) of Y. pestis Crp dimer bound to cAMP (PDB ID 6DT4). (B) Overlap of Y. pestis Crp chain A (blue) with E. coli Crp (yellow) (PDB ID 4R8H, chain A) (30). Residues that differ between Y. pestis and E. coli are marked, with the Y. pestis residue indicated first. Residues modified in E. coli that result in constitutive binding to DNA are also marked. (C) Dimer interface of Y. pestis Crp showing residues that differ from E. coli.

Thus, cAMP concentration data, structural comparisons, and EMSA data suggest that Crp function is controlled by cAMP in Y. pestis but that the cAMP concentrations did not vary dramatically under the conditions surveyed in this study. Thus, we expect that variations in gene expression noted in this study would be linked specifically to Crp. This expectation is consistent with our prior finding that regulation of pla (between planktonic and biofilm-grown cells) depends on differential expression of Crp as opposed to changes in cAMP (26).

Global analysis of gene expression.We subsequently performed RNA-seq on total RNA isolated from Y. pestis pCD1 and the Δcrp mutant under all experimental conditions. RNA from Y. pestis Δcrp growing planktonically and in biofilms was collected to identify Crp-regulated genes. Deep sequencing reads were mapped to the Y. pestis chromosome and plasmids pPCP1 and pMT1. Reads were also mapped to the location of annotated small RNAs (sRNAs) in Y. pestis (33). The raw RNA-seq data sets were deposited into GenBank (accession no. GSE135228). The cutoff value for significantly differentially expressed genes was set at log2 fold change greater than 1 or less than −1, with a false-discovery-rate (FDR) P value of <0.05. Complete lists of differentially expressed genes can be found in Data Sets S1 and S2 in the supplemental material. Principal-component analysis revealed close associations of most of the replicates across all conditions (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Crp and carbon source altered expression of thousands of Y. pestis genes in planktonic and biofilm growth states (Fig. 3A to D). Indeed, 1,200 unique protein-coding genes (713 Crp-activated and 487 Crp-repressed genes) were impacted by the presence of crp whereas the presence of glucose altered expression of 1,872 unique genes between the planktonic and biofilm growth states.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Identification of Crp-regulated, biofilm-regulated, and glucose-regulated genes in Y. pestis. (A to D) Volcano plots of genes differentially expressed between wild-type Y. pestis and Y. pestis Δcrp (A and C) and Y. pestis grown in 0.2% glucose versus glycerol (B and D) in the planktonic (A and B) and biofilm (C to D) states. Each individual dot represents a gene of Y. pestis; red dots and numbers indicate genes with log2 fold change greater than 1 or less than −1 and a false-discovery-rate P value of <0.05. (E) Venn diagram of Crp-regulated genes in Y. pestis from this study and Crp-regulated genes in the related Y. pseudotuberculosis (Y. pseudotb) YPIII strain (31). (F) Volcano plot of genes differentially expressed between Y. pestis grown in the planktonic and biofilm states in the presence of 0.2% glucose.

FIG S1

Principal-component analysis of RNA-seq dataset. Data represent principal-component analysis of results of comparisons of the six different conditions and three different replicates. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.6 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Only 47 genes were differentially expressed strictly between plankton- and biofilm-grown cells (Fig. 3F). The low number of differentially expressed genes might be due to overlap of planktonic cells with biofilm cells at the air-liquid interface or to heterogeneous expression of genes throughout the biofilm. Genes required for biofilm formation such as those encoding diguanylate cyclases, e.g., hmsT and Y. pestis 0449 (ypo0449), were not differentially expressed between planktonic and biofilm cells (12, 34, 35). A similar observation in a study reported previously by Vadyvaloo et al. revealed that these genes were also not significantly different between planktonic cells and biofilms in flow cells (36). Genes previously known to influence biofilm formation, namely, crp (12), csrA (13), rcsAB (37), rovM and rovA (38), phoPQ (39), fur (40), and hfq (35), were also not differentially expressed. These data more likely suggest that genes for regulating biofilm formation are controlled by environmental factors, such as temperature and growth in the flea (41, 42). Carbon source is also known to play a role (13), and while we observed no difference in the levels of expression of the diguanylate cyclases in biofilms, they were significantly upregulated in glycerol compared to glucose (Data Set S1). An additional possibility is that the biofilms observed in vitro are the result of adhesion and autoaggregation of Y. pestis cells to each other and to the flasks due to the presence of the Ail outer adhesin. Expression of the ail gene was downregulated in Y. pestis biofilms in glucose and glycerol as shown by RNA-seq, but we cannot discount the possibility that sufficient Ail was still present to account for the biofilm or aggregation.

DATA SET S1

List of differentially expressed mRNAs in Y. pestis CO92 from comparisons between all test conditions. Download Data Set S1, XLSX file, 0.9 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Significant genes were categorized and enriched by biological process with Gene Ontology (GO) at GeneOntology.org by the use of Y. pestis as a reference list (Data Set S3) (43, 44). Categorizing Crp-activated genes in planktonic or biofilm cells returned results that demonstrated enrichment of DNA-templated transcriptional regulators involved in a wide range of biological processes, including catabolism of carbohydrates (malT and araC), amino acid metabolism (leuO), and quorum sensing (ypeR and yspR). This category was also enriched in glucose-repressed (i.e., glycerol-activated) genes with overlap of multiple transcriptional regulators, including malT and ypeR. We anticipated overlapping of Crp-activated and glucose-repressed genes, as well as overlapping of Crp-repressed and glucose-activated genes, on the basis of the function of cAMP-Crp. By filtering these data sets for genes increased in glycerol compared to glucose and increased in wild-type Y. pestis compared to Y. pestis Δcrp, we were able to better identify cAMP-Crp-activated (or repressed) genes (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). Importantly, the pla gene, known to be Crp-activated and glucose-repressed and active during the end stages of pneumonic plague (6, 23), filtered into the Crp-activated category. Several Crp-regulated genes from a previous microarray of Y. pestis (pim, pst, ptsG, araF, rpoH, yfiA, and ompC) (32) were also identified. While GO analysis identified quorum sensing transcriptional regulators yspR and ypeR as Crp activated, the corresponding acyl-homoserine lactone synthetase genes (yspI and ypeI) also were identified as CRP activated (Table S2).

TABLE S2

Crp-activated and -repressed genes. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DATA SET S2

List of differentially expressed sRNAs previously identified in Y. pestis CO92 from comparisons between all test conditions. Download Data Set S2, XLSX file, 0.2 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DATA SET S3

Gene ontology. Download Data Set S3, XLSX file, 0.03 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Furthermore, while we observed few differentially expressed genes in comparisons of Y. pestis in biofilms to Y. pestis in planktonic cells, genes and enriched pathways classified as activated or repressed by Crp or glucose differed between planktonic and biofilm cells. In other words, the determination of which genes or pathways are turned on by Crp or respond to changes in carbon source depends on whether Y. pestis is growing in a planktonic or biofilm state. We subsequently focused on identifying Crp-regulated genes that may play a role during the progression of pneumonic plague as Y. pestis forms biofilms and the environment switches from Crp repressive to Crp active.

We also observed overlapping of Crp-regulated genes identified here for Y. pestis and previously published expression profiling for Y. pseudotuberculosis compared to its isogenic Δcrp mutant (45). In total, 160 genes were shared across these data sets as differentially expressed in a manner dependent upon Crp, despite differing culture conditions and cutoffs for significance (Fig. 3E). An additional five genes (rseC, rpsL, rpsG, rpmA, and ybiT) were Crp activated in one species but Crp repressed in the other. Differences between the two data sets may also have resulted from the differing manners in which the crp gene is regulated among the two species. The small RNA chaperone Hfq is required for full production of Crp in Y. pestis but not in Y. pseudotuberculosis (6, 31). The PhoP response regulator is an activator of crp expression in one strain of Y. pestis (21), but variation in the DNA-binding domain of PhoP between Yersinia strains alters transcription of its target genes (46). In addition, these differences in regulation of the crp gene and in the extent to which genes are regulated by Crp likely result from changes in the promoter region of genes and reflect adaptations to the different environments that Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis inhabit.

Crp indirectly represses expression of genes for yersiniabactin biosynthesis and uptake.Among all the genes identified as controlled by Crp in the RNA-seq data set, it was noted that Crp represses expression of genes for metal acquisition (Data Set S1). These included genes for biosynthesis and uptake of the iron siderophore yersiniabactin (Ybt), such as fyuA, the gene for the Ybt receptor, and ybtA, the gene for the transcriptional regulator that controls expression of the Ybt locus (Table 1) (47). Consequently, the levels of expression of the irp genes, required for Ybt production, and genes for heme transport were also decreased, but the genes for the Yfe and Feo transport systems were not significantly differentially expressed (Table 1). Crp also represses expression of ybtX (irp8 in strain CO92), a known virulence factor and trigger of inflammation during pneumonic plague (48, 49).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Gene expression change due to Δcrp in metal acquisition genes

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) results supported the RNA-seq results, as transcript levels of ybtA and fyuA were reduced in glycerol-grown cultures and were also increased in the Δcrp mutant, albeit not to a statistically significant degree (Fig. 4C and D). Crp repression was observed in both the biofilm and planktonic states. EMSAs were also performed to determine whether Crp directly binds to the promoters of these genes. In contrast to Crp binding to the DNA sequence corresponding to the pla promoter in a cAMP-dependent manner (Fig. 5A), Crp did not bind to sequences corresponding to the ybtA or fyuA promoters (Fig. 5B and C). Thus, the control of Ybt by Crp is likely indirect. Crp did not alter expression of fur or of the RyhB sRNAs, known regulators of iron acquisition (Data Sets S1 and S2).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

qRT-PCR of Crp-regulated genes identified from RNA-seq. RNA was isolated from cultures grown under the same conditions for RNA-seq. qRT-PCR for (A) pla, (B) crp, (C) ybtA, (D) fyuA, (E) ptsG, (F) malT, (G) yspI, and (H) ypeR. Data represent the means and SEM of results from four independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (from one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparison test).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Crp binds to pla, malT, ptsG, and ypeR promoter sequences. EMSAs using purified Crp protein incubated with DNA fragments corresponding to promoters for (A) pla, (B) ybtA, (C) fyuA, (D) malT, (E) ptsG, (F) yspI, and (G) ypeR. Red arrows denote shifted band present in lanes containing Crp protein and cAMP. Table denotes concentrations of Crp protein, cAMP, and promoter DNA used in each reaction.

It is surprising to find that ybt genes are Crp repressed whereas other virulence factors, such as pla and psa, are Crp activated. Iron acquisition is critical for Y. pestis pathogenesis in multiple infectious routes (50) and would have been predicted to be required in the potential iron-limiting environment of the lung. It is possible that Ybt is necessary early in pneumonia and expressed when glucose is plentiful and crp expression is low. As the pneumonia progresses to the proinflammatory phase and host cells die of pyroptosis (51), iron is acquired by other means or is more available and Crp turns off expression of the Ybt genes indirectly.

Crp is required for growth on nonglucose sugars and directly binds to the malT promoter.Another potential important set of genes controlled by Crp during infection consists of those essential for the use of alternative carbon sources as glucose is depleted in the lung. Many of the Crp-activated genes identified by RNA-seq and enriched pathways identified by GO analysis are involved in metabolism or transport (Data Sets S1 and S3). This is not surprising given the historical role of Crp in regulating the lac operon and genes for alternative sugar metabolism mechanisms (52). In our RNA-seq data, we found that Crp activated expression of ptsG, which is a gene that is required for acquiring glucose during pneumonia and that is also important during bubonic plague (26). Crp was also found to increase expression of malT, the transcriptional activator of maltose metabolism (53). Genes ptsG and malT were confirmed to be controlled by Crp, as transcript levels were lower in the Δcrp mutant than in wild-type Y. pestis as shown by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4E and F), but transcript levels were not increased when grown in glycerol. This regulation was direct, as EMSAs demonstrated that Crp directly bound to the promoter sequences for ptsG and malT (Fig. 5D and E). In addition, the binding of Crp to these promoters required cAMP.

The direct regulation of the malT promoter by Crp suggested that maltose could be an important alternative to glucose to support growth of Y. pestis. Indeed, while Y. pestis grew well in thoroughly modified Higuchi (TMH) medium with maltose (Fig. 6A), the Δcrp mutant did not grow with maltose as the sole carbon source. Deletion of malT also reduced growth, although this mutant grew better than Y. pestis Δcrp, suggesting that Crp activates expression of additional genes involved in maltose metabolism. Complementation of crp and malT restored growth of the Δcrp and ΔmalT mutants, respectively. In addition to the results seen with maltose, Y. pestis grew better in TMH medium supplemented with galactose than in TMH medium alone (Fig. 6B). Genes for galactose catabolism were not significantly different between wild-type Y. pestis and Y. pestis Δcrp, but genes in the araF operon for arabinose catabolism were found to be dependent on crp for expression (Data Set S1). In TMH medium supplemented with glucose, Y. pestis formed a biofilm at the air-liquid interface that resulted in lowered observed growth in this assay (Fig. S2A). Such robust biofilm formation was not observed in the presence of the other carbon sources. In contrast, Y. pestis Δcrp grew only in TMH medium with glucose (Fig. 6C), suggesting that Crp-activated genes are necessary for metabolism of nonglucose carbon sources. However, which carbon sources Y. pestis uses in the lungs after glucose is consumed is unknown.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Crp is required for growth on nonglucose sugars. (A) Growth of wild-type Y. pestis and denoted strains on TMH medium plus 0.2% maltose for 16 h at 37°C. (B and C) Growth of wild-type Y. pestis (B) and Y. pestis Δcrp (C) in TMH medium supplemented with no carbon source or 0.2% of the indicated carbon sources for 16 h at 37°C. Data are combined from three independent experiments, and error bars represent means and SEM.

FIG S2

Biofilm formation after growth in TMH medium. The images show results of crystal violet staining of (A) Y. pestis and (B) Y. pestis Δcrp biofilms formed after 16 h of growth in TMH medium supplemented with indicated carbon sources. Wells were stained as described previously (35). Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.3 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Crp directly and indirectly regulates expression of quorum sensing genes.A final class of potentially important Crp-regulated genes identified in this study consists of those associated with the LuxIR-based acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) quorum sensing systems. The gene pairs in the Y. pestis genome are 100% identical to the AHL synthetase genes (yspI and ypeI) convergently transcribed with the receptors (yspR and ypeR) (Fig. 7A). Crp positively controlled expression of both the AHL synthetase genes and the AHL receptors (Table 2). qRT-PCR demonstrated that expression of yspI and ypeR in glycerol was increased in wild-type Y. pestis compared to Y. pestis Δcrp, similarly to the positive-control pla (Fig. 4A and G to H; not statistically significant). Moreover, expression of the AHL synthetase yspI gene was further increased during biofilm growth. A cAMP-Crp dependent shift of the DNA sequence corresponding to the ypeR promoter was observed by EMSA (Fig. 5E). However, Crp did not bind to yspI promoter sequence (Fig. 5F), suggesting that regulation of this gene is indirect.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

Crp directly and indirectly regulates expression of Y. pestis quorum sensing. (A) Schematic of arrangement of yspIR and ypeRI loci in genome of Y. pestis CO92. (B to E) Results of GFP reporter assays performed using the (B) PypeI-GFP, (C) PypeR-GFP, (D) PyspI-GFP, and (E) PyspR-GFP reporters integrated into wild-type Y. pestis and the Δcrp, ΔypeIR, ΔyspIR, and ΔypeIR ΔyspIR mutant strains. Background fluorescence was subtracted, and the remaining signal was normalized to wild-type Y. pestis, the value for which was set to 1. Data represent the means and SEM of results from three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (from one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparison test).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2

Gene expression change due to Δcrp in quorum sensing genes

In Y. pseudotuberculosis, expression of the same quorum sensing genes is autoregulated and regulated by each other and and Crp activated (31, 54). Both sets of synthetases and receptors are expressed from separate promoters antiparallel to each other (Fig. 7A). To determine if a similar pattern occurs in Y. pestis, green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporters containing the promoter regions of yspR, yspI, ypeI, and ypeR were integrated into wild-type Y. pestis, Y. pestis Δcrp, Y. pestis with deletion of ypeI plus ypeR (ΔypeIR), Y. pestis with deletion of yspR plus yspI (ΔyspRI), or Y. pestis with deletion of all four AHL genes (ΔyspRI ΔypeIR). Expression of all four reporters was reduced approximately 50% in Y. pestis Δcrp, confirming RNA-seq and qRT-PCR data showing that Crp stimulates expression of the ype and ysp AHL genes (Fig. 7B to E). Expression of the PypeI-GFP reporter showed no dependence upon ysp or ype genes. The PypeR-GFP reporter expression was reduced in the ΔypeIR and ΔyspRI ΔypeIR mutants, suggesting that ypeR expression may be positively autoregulated, but the differences were not statistically significant. Exactly the opposite occurs in Y. pseudotuberculosis, wherein the ypeIR (ypsIR) genes repress their own expression at 37°C (54). Expression of the PyspI-GFP reporter was reduced 2-fold in Y. pestis ΔypeIR, suggesting that the reduction in yspI expression in Y. pestis Δcrp could have been due in part to reduced expression of ypeR (Fig. 4G). Similarly, the yspI homolog in Y. pseudotuberculosis is dependent on ypeR (ypsR in Y. pseudotuberculosis) (54) and expression of ypeIR and yspIR homologs in Y. pseudotuberculosis YPIII may also be Crp regulated (31).

Taken together, these data suggest direct regulation by Crp at the ypeR promoter and indirect regulation of yspI through ypeR resulting in stimulation of genes in glucose-limited media in biofilm. Despite the coding sequences of these genes being 100% identical, the quorum sensing genes are regulated differently between and within Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis.

Crp regulates production of AHLs in vitro.Given the decrease in expression of yspI and ypeI in Y. pestis Δcrp, production of AHLs should also have been reduced. Cell-free supernatants from Y. pestis strains were collected during planktonic growth in vitro and were used to stimulate the Rhizobium radiobacter AHL bioreporter. Levels of AHLs produced by Y. pestis increased with cell density during exponential-phase growth as expected for quorum sensing (Fig. S3A). In contrast, AHL production in Y. pestis Δcrp increased only slightly despite a 6-fold increase in bacterial density. Because the growth rate of Y. pestis Δcrp was found to be reduced, AHL concentrations were also compared between strains at similar cell densities. Even accounting for cell density, AHL production was reduced in the Δcrp strain (Fig. 8A). These data suggest that the reduction in AHL production was due to reduced ypeI and yspI expression and not to differences in cell density or growth of Y. pestis Δcrp. To determine if Crp alters production of specific AHLs, extracts were developed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Three spots were observed in all three strains that corresponded to 3-oxo-C6-homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C6-HSL), C6-HSL, and C8-HSL (Fig. 8C, top to bottom) as reported previously for Y. pestis (55). However, the areas of each of the spots from Y. pestis Δcrp were smaller. No spots were detectable in extracts collected from the ΔypeIR ΔyspRI mutant strain (ΔAHL, Fig. 8D).

FIG 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8

AHL production requires Crp and increases during pneumonic plague. (A) Comparison of levels of AHL production by wild-type Y. pestis and the Δcrp and Δcrp+crp strains at equivalent cell densities. (B) β-Galactosidase activity from AHL reporter strain of R. radiobacter incubated with BALF collected from mock-infected mice or mice infected intranasally with Y. pestis for 24, 48, or 72 h. (C) Representative TLC plate of AHL extracts collected from wild-type (WT) Y. pestis and the Y. pestis Δcrp and Δcrp+crp strains grown to an OD620 of 0.80 (wild-type Y. pestis and Y. pestis Δcrp+crp after 6 h, Y. pestis Δcrp after 12 h). From top to bottom, the proportions of the intensity of the AHL spots from Y. pestis Δcrp were 77%, 83%, and 76% those of the area of the wild-type strain corresponding to N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-l-homoserine, N-hexanoyl-l-homoserine, and N-octanoyl-l-homoserine lactones, respectively (55). Data are representative of results from three-independent experiments. Spot intensities were calculated in Fiji. (D) Representative TLC plate of AHL extracts collected from BALF samples. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 (from Student's t test).

FIG S3

Crp does not regulate AI-2-based quorum sensing. (A) Growth (OD620, left y axis, solid lines) and AHL production (Miller units, right y axis, dotted lines) of wild-type (black), Δcrp (red), Δcrp+crp (blue), and ΔypeIR ΔyspIR (purple) Y. pestis strains. Strains were grown in TMH medium with 0.2% glucose at 37°C. The OD620 of cultures was measured every 2 h, and culture supernatants were collected and used to stimulate a R. radiobacter bioreporter. (B) AI-2 production measured using the V. harveyi MM32 bioreporter from supernatants collected as described for panel A. (C) Comparison of AI-2 production by wild-type, Δcrp, and Δcrp+crpY. pestis strains at equivalent cell densities. Data represent the means and SEM of results from four independent experiments. (D) Luminescence production from the AI-2 reporter strain of V. harveyi incubated with BALF collected from mock-infected mice or mice infected intranasally with Y. pestis for 24, 48, or 72 h. Data are combined from two independent animal infections with n = 5 at each time point. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 (from Student’s t test). Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.0 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

To determine whether AHL molecules are produced during lung infection, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected from mice infected with fully virulent Y. pestis. AHLs were undetectable in BALF from mock-infected mice and mice at 24 h postinfection (hpi) (Fig. 8B). Only low levels of AHLs were detectable in BALF at 48 hpi, while BALF contained a 10-fold increase in AHLs at 72 hpi. Similar trends were present for AHLs from BALF developed by TLC plates (Fig. 8D). The significant increase in AHLs at 72 hpi correlates with the time frame during pneumonia when Y. pestis depletes glucose from the lungs, forms large biofilms, and, as a result, expresses crp at a high level (Fig. 1A) (26). The formation of biofilms in the lungs may provide a favorable environment for amplification of quorum sensing-based gene regulation. Indeed, yspI was more highly expressed in vitro in glycerol-grown biofilms than in glucose-grown biofilms (Fig. 4G). Taken together, these data provide strong evidence for Crp-dependent production of AHLs and induction of quorum sensing during lung infection. Transcriptome studies have linked Y. pestis quorum sensing mutants to defects in multiple behaviors (75). Deletion of both synthetase-receptor pairs impairs the ability of Y. pestis to make biofilms and metabolize maltose (55, 56). Both of these phenotypes are also Crp dependent (Fig. 6) (12) and suggest that connecting the Crp regulon to the quorum sensing regulon may allow Y. pestis to cooperatively regulate gene expression under conditions in which glucose is depleted and bacterial density is high.

While multiple measurements indicated that Crp regulates AHL-based quorum sensing, autoinducer-2 (AI-2)-based or LuxS-based quorum sensing is not Crp regulated in the planktonic state (Table 2; see also Data Set S1). The levels of AI-2 secretion were not significantly different between wild-type Y. pestis and Y. pestis Δcrp at equivalent cell densities in planktonic culture (Fig. S3B and C). In contrast to AHLs, the concentration of AI-2 in BALF samples increased in a stepwise manner from 24 to 48 to 72 hpi as Y. pestis density grew within the lungs even prior to the period of increased expression of crp (Fig. S3D) (26). These data suggest that AI-2 production is not dependent on Crp but rather that bacterial cell density increases between 24 and 72 hpi.

Conclusions.In this study, we solved the crystal structure of Y. pestis Crp while determining its regulon under planktonic and biofilm conditions. While crp is structurally similar to the E. coli Crp gene, the modes of regulation of the crp gene differ among pathogenic Yersinia spp., which colonize distinct environmental niches. Overall, transcription profiling conducted in this study revealed comprehensive insight into how Y. pestis adapts to growth in the biofilm state and the role of Crp and carbon sources during this growth. This is specifically relevant in the lungs, where Crp, through sensing of depletion of glucose, may serve as a switch turning on or off multiple behaviors of Y. pestis as disease progresses (26) (Fig. 9).

FIG 9
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 9

Model of identified Crp-activated genes and pathways in Y. pestis. Crp requires cAMP in order to regulate multiple behaviors of Y. pestis, including virulence, quorum sensing, iron acquisition, inflammation, and sugar uptake and catabolism. cAMP-Crp also regulates expression of hundreds of other mRNAs, including transcription factors, and small noncoding RNAs.

A unique result revealed by our transcriptional profiling was the observed indirect repression of Ybt genes by Crp (Table 1; see also Table S2). The Ybt and irp genes are critical for iron acquisition, virulence, and inflammation during pneumonic plague (48–50). Expression of these genes may be higher during the first 48 hpi, when expression and activity of Crp are low (Fig. 1A). After 48 hpi, Crp activates a second set of virulence factors such as pla and psa as disease progresses, correlating with the biphasic nature of pneumonic plague (23, 27, 32). The regulation of iron acquisition genes is unique to Y. pestis compared to Y. pseudotuberculosis. Even though these closely related species share 100% identical Crp proteins, the expression of the crp gene and the environments inhabited by these species may afford different sets of regulated genes.

We have expanded the pool of directly Crp-activated genes in Y. pestis to include genes for quorum sensing and alternative metabolisms. As glucose becomes a limiting resource, genes for carbohydrate catabolism and uptake are activated to support growth of Y. pestis. Within biofilms in the lungs, AHL-dependent quorum sensing is likely amplified due to the close proximity of cells. Here, we report production of AHLs in the lungs of plague-infected mice correlating with the time during which expression of crp is highest and Y. pestis is growing within biofilms of the lungs. Thus, Crp is directly regulating not only its own genes but also other transcriptional regulators and regulons (Fig. 9). These additional pathways may direct additional Yersinia behaviors and may serve as a link to the examples of indirect regulation observed in our data set. Future experimentation performed on the differentially expressed mRNAs and sRNAs identified in this study will provide additional information on biofilm-regulated and Crp-regulated genes and behaviors in Y. pestis and on their importance during pneumonia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, media, and growth conditions.The bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study are listed in Tables S3 and S4 in the supplemental material. Y. pestis strains (6, 74) were passaged on Difco brain heart infusion (BHI) agar (Becton, Dickinson) and into 2 ml of BHI broth or of the defined media, TMH (57), supplemented with 0.2% glucose for overnight growth at 26°C. Unless otherwise stated, overnight cultures in TMH medium were subcultured at an optical density at 620 nm (OD620) of 0.1 into 10 ml of TMH medium with 0.2% glucose in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks incubated at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm for measuring planktonic and biofilm cell differences. Planktonic cells were removed from the flask with a serological pipette. Biofilms were scraped and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) warmed to 37°C. For growth assays, overnight cultures were subcultured at an OD620 of 0.1 into 200 μl of fresh TMH medium with 0.2% of indicated carbon sources at 37°C in a 96-well plate. Absorbance was measured with a Molecular Devices Spectramax M5 microplate reader. E. coli strains were passaged on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar or in LB broth at 37°C. Vibrio harveyi MM32 (75) was cultured in ATCC 2034 medium or LB with kanamycin. R. radiobacter was passaged on BHI medium with gentamicin. Ampicillin (100 μg/ml), kanamycin (50 μg/ml), and gentamicin (15 μg/ml) were added as necessary.

TABLE S3

List of bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S4

List of oligonucleotides used in this study. Download Table S4, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Construction of new strains and plasmids.Y. pestis mutants containing deletions in crp, ypeIR, yspRI, and luxS were generated by lambda red recombination (6). The ΔypeIR ΔyspRI double mutant was generated by deletion of the ypeIR locus from the ΔyspRI mutant. Y. pestis Δcrp and ΔmalT were complemented in trans by cloning the crp or malT codons plus 500 bp flanking the genes into pUC18-R6k-miniTn7t by Gibson assembly. The resulting plasmid was integrated into the Tn7 site (58). GFP reporters were also integrated into the Tn7 site. Amplification of 500 bp upstream of the promoters for yspI, yspR, ypeI, and ypeR was performed by PCR, and the amplification products were adjoined to the codons of gfp by overlap extension PCR as described previously (35).

RNA extraction, sequencing, and qRT-PCR.Total RNA was isolated from Y. pestis cultures as described previously (59) except that RNA protect reagent (Qiagen) was added to planktonic or biofilm cells in PBS. RNA was treated with 1 μl of Turbo DNase (Invitrogen Life Technologies) for 30 min at 37°C followed by addition of another 1 μl for 30 min following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Next-generation RNA sequencing was carried out at the Northwestern University NUSeq Core Facility. Total RNA was checked for quality and quantity on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 and a Qubit fluorometer. An Illumina TruSeq stranded total RNA library preparation kit was used to prepare sequencing libraries from 500 ng of total RNA samples according to the manufacturer’s instructions without modifications. This procedure includes depletion of rRNA by the use of a Ribo-Zero rRNA removal kit (bacteria), purification and fragmentation of the remaining RNA, cDNA synthesis, 3′-end adenylation, Illumina adapter ligation, and library PCR amplification and validation. An Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencer was used to sequence the libraries with the production of single-ended, 75-bp reads.

The quality of DNA reads, in fastq format, was evaluated using FastQC. Adapters were trimmed, and reads that were of poor quality or that aligned to rRNA sequences were filtered out. The cleaned reads were aligned to the Y. pestis genome (NC_003143.1) and plasmids pPCP1 (NC_003132.1) and pMT1 (NC_003134.1) using STAR (60). Read counts for each gene were calculated using htseq-count (61) in conjunction with a gene annotation file for Y. pestis. Read counts for sRNA were obtained using bedtools and the annotated locations reported previously by Schiano et al. (33). Normalization and differential expression were determined using DESeq2 (62). The cutoff for determining significantly differentially expressed genes was a false-discovery-rate (FDR)-adjusted P value of less than 0.05. Raw and processed data were deposited into the GEO database at the NCBI (see below).

For validation of RNA sequencing results, qRT-PCR was performed using a SuperScript III Platinum SYBR green one-step qRT-PCR kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 25 ng of DNased RNA on a Bio-Rad iQ5 cycler with melt curve analysis following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Purification of Y. pestis Crp.The amplified crp gene corresponding to residues 1 to 210 from Y. pestis CO92 (www.csgid.org; accession no. IDP97063) was cloned by Gibson assembly into the SspI site of expression vector pMCSG7 (63, 76), which contains an N-terminal polyhistidine tag followed by the tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site and the start codon of the crp gene. The resulting plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) (Magic). The bacteria were grown at 37°C and 200 rpm in 3 liters of Terrific broth until the OD600 reached 1.6. Protein expression was induced with 0.6 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside), and cells were grown overnight with the shaking rate reduced to 180 rpm and the temperature to 22°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation. The resulting cell pellet was resuspended in 120 ml of lysis buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP), 10% (vol/vol) glycerol, 0.01% (vol/vol) IGEPAL CA630, Roche EDTA-free protease inhibitors (1 tablet/100 ml buffer)], and the suspension was frozen at –20°C until purification. The frozen suspension was thawed under the cold running water, sonicated, and centrifuged. The protein was purified in two steps using nickel (II) affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography as described previously (65). The polyhistidine tag was removed by incubation of the tagged protein with the recombinant TEV protease for overnight at 20°C. The resulting 58 mg of pure protein was at a final concentration of 13.7 mg/ml.

Structure determination of Y. pestis Crp.For crystallization screening, we used a protein solution with a concentration of 6.6 mg/ml in a mixture containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 500 mM NaCl, 5 mM TCEP, and 1 mM cAMP. Crystallization drops were equilibrated at a 1:1 protein/reservoir solution ratio against 96 conditions/screen using commercially available PACT, PEG and PEG II suites (Qiagen). Diffraction-quality crystals of Crp were grown under PACT suite condition H12.

Prior to flash-cooling in liquid nitrogen, crystals of Crp were transferred into a 5-μl drop of the reservoir solution that they had grown from. Data were collected on the LS-CAT 21-ID-F beamline at the Advanced Photon Source (APS) at Argonne National Laboratory. A total of 350 images were indexed, scaled, and integrated using HKL-3000 (66). Data collection and data processing statistics are listed in Table S1. The structure of Y. pestis Crp in complex with cAMP was solved by molecular replacement using Phaser (67) from the CCP4 suite (68). The structure E. coli Crp (PDB entry 3RYP) was used as a search model. The initial solution was processed by several rounds of refinement in REFMAC v.5.5, residues were mutated, and cAMP was added in Coot (69). Water molecules were generated using ARP/wARP (70), and the model refinement was continued in REFMAC. Translation-libration-screw (TLS) groups were created by the use of the TLSMD server (71) (http://skuld.bmsc.washington.edu/~tlsmd/), and TLS corrections were applied during the final stages of refinement. MolProbity (64; http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/) was used for monitoring the quality of the model during refinement and for the final validation of the structure. The final model and diffraction data were deposited in the Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/; see below). The final model consists of two polypeptide chains which form a dimer. Chain A contains Crp residues 6 to 208, and chain B contains residues 9 to 208. The crystal structure includes one cAMP molecule bound to each monomer, 3 chloride ions, and 292 water molecules. Refinement statistics and the quality of the final model are summarized in Table S1. Molecular graphics procedures and alignment with E. coli Crp bound to cAMP (PDB ID 4R8H) (30) were performed with the UCSF Chimera package.

TABLE S1

X-ray data collection and refinement statistics of Y. pestis Crp. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.
Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Gel shift assays.EMSAs were carried out using a LightShift chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Biotinylated primers were used for PCR amplification of gene-specific promoters (Table S4). PCR products were concentrated and gel purified using Wizard SV Gel and PCR cleanup protocol (Promega). Binding reactions were performed with the manufacturer’s binding buffer, 100 ng poly(dI-dC), and 20 fmol of biotinylated promoter fragment in a 20-μl reaction mixture. Reaction mixtures contained increasing amounts (6.25 to 100 ng) of purified Crp protein and cAMP (Sigma) (2 mmol). Binding reactions were carried out following the manufacturer’s instructions. Nylon membranes (Hybond-N+; 30 cm) were developed using X-ray film.

GFP reporter assays.For GFP reporter assays, 2-ml volumes of overnight Y. pestis cultures in TMH medium with 0.2% glucose were subcultured at an OD620 of 0.1 into 2 ml of TMH medium incubated at 37°C in a rotary drum for 6 h. Cultures were diluted to an OD620 of 0.25 to 0.40, and 200-μl aliquots were added in duplicate to a 96-well plate. Fluorescence was read on a Tecan Safire II plate reader, and results are reported as previously described (6).

AHL and AI-2 bioreporter assays.R. radiobacter carrying pZLR4 was grown overnight at 30°C. Cultures were diluted to an OD620 of 0.1 in 1 ml of BHI medium. A 1-μl volume of filter-sterilized supernatants of Y. pestis or 10 μl of filter-sterilized BALF, previously collected from mice intranasally infected with wild-type Y. pestis (26), was added. Tubes were incubated at 30°C with shaking at 250 rpm for 5 h. Cultures were pelleted and resuspended in 500 μl of Z-buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, pH 7.0). A 25-μl volume of chloroform and a 12.5-μl volume of 0.1% SDS were used to lyse the bacteria for 5 min. A 100-μl volume of 2-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (ONPG; 4 mg/ml) was added to initiate the galactosidase reaction, which was stopped by the addition of 250 μl of 1 M Na2CO3. The reaction mixtures were centrifuged for 5 min at 13,000 rpm, and 500 μl was added to a cuvette to record the OD420. Relative beta-galactosidase activity levels were expressed as ratios of OD420/OD620.

For TLC, 100-μl volumes of culture supernatants or BALF were extracted twice with 100 μl of ethyl acetate and concentrated to 20 μl in a 60-Hz Savant SpeedVac DNA 100 concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Volumes of 1 μl of culture supernatants or 7.5 μl of BALF samples were spotted onto aluminum-backed C18-W silica plates (Sorbent Technologies) and developed in 60% methanol–40% water as described previously (55).

To measure AI-2 concentrations, overnight cultures of MM32 were diluted 1:500 and grown at 30°C for 1 h. A 180-μl volume was added to a 96-well plate with 20 μl of either culture supernatant or BALF. Plates were incubated at 30°C with shaking for 5 h. Optical density and luminescence were recorded on a Molecular Devices Spectramax M5 microplate reader. Reported data are from 3 h of incubation (culture supernatants) and 4 h of incubation (BALF).

Measurement of intracellular cAMP concentration.Overnight cultures of Y. pestis were diluted to an OD620 of 0.1 in TMH medium with 0.2% glucose or 0.2% glycerol and grown for 6 h at 26°C or 37°C. Alternatively Y. pestis was grown in TMH medium overnight in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks to form biofilms. Volumes consisting of 0.2 OD620 equivalents were centrifuged and lysed in 0.1 M HCl–0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min. Cellular debris was pelleted by centrifugation, and the supernatant was stored at –20°C. A Direct cAMP ELISA kit (72) was used following the acetylation protocol. cAMP concentrations were normalized to protein content measured using a Pierce bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Statistical analysis and graphing.Statistical analyses, including Student’s t tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni multiple-comparison tests, were performed using GraphPad Prism, version 5.0, with a P value of <0.05 as a cutoff for significance. Venn diagrams and volcano plots were generated in R (Version 9.0) using the VennDiagram (Version 1.6.20) and tidyverse (Version 1.1.1) packages.

Gene ontology analysis.RNA-seq data were processed at GeneOntology.org (43, 44) using GO enrichment analysis (73). The PANTHER overrepresentation test (released 11 July 2019) was conducted with the GO Ontology database (released 3 July 2019). The reference list used was that of Yersinia pestis.

Data availability.Raw and processed data were deposited in the GEO database at the NCBI (GEO accession number GSE135228). The final model and diffraction data for Crp were deposited in the Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/) with the assigned PDB entry 6DT4.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ludmilla Shuvalova and Olga Kiryukhina for expression, purification, crystallization, and data collection of the Crp protein.

Use of the Tecan Safire II plate reader and access to structure determination software and LS-CAT were provided by the Northwestern University Structural Biology Facility supported by NCICSG P30-CA60553. Chimera is developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco (supported by NIGMS P41-GM103311). This project was funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract number HHSN272201700060C and grant number R21 AI111018 (to K.J.F.S.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 3 October 2019
    • Accepted 8 October 2019
    • Published 19 November 2019
  • Copyright © 2019 Ritzert et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Perry RD,
    2. Fetherston JD
    . 1997. Yersinia pestis–etiologic agent of plague. Clin Microbiol Rev 10:35–66. doi:10.1128/CMR.10.1.35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Reboul A,
    2. Lemaitre N,
    3. Titecat M,
    4. Merchez M,
    5. Deloison G,
    6. Ricard I,
    7. Pradel E,
    8. Marceau M,
    9. Sebbane F
    . 2014. Yersinia pestis requires the 2-component regulatory system OmpR-EnvZ to resist innate immunity during the early and late stages of plague. J Infect Dis 210:1367–1375. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiu274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Atkinson S,
    2. Sockett RE,
    3. Camara M,
    4. Williams P
    . 2006. Quorum sensing and the lifestyle of Yersinia. Curr Issues Mol Biol 8:1–10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Heroven AK,
    2. Dersch P
    . 2014. Coregulation of host-adapted metabolism and virulence by pathogenic yersiniae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:146. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2014.00146.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chen S,
    2. Thompson KM,
    3. Francis MS
    . 2016. Environmental regulation of Yersinia pathophysiology. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:25. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2016.00025.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lathem WW,
    2. Schroeder JA,
    3. Bellows LE,
    4. Ritzert JT,
    5. Koo JT,
    6. Price PA,
    7. Caulfield AJ,
    8. Goldman WE
    . 2014. Posttranscriptional regulation of the Yersinia pestis cyclic AMP receptor protein Crp and impact on virulence. mBio 5:e01038-13. doi:10.1128/mBio.01038-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Green J,
    2. Stapleton MR,
    3. Smith LJ,
    4. Artymiuk PJ,
    5. Kahramanoglou C,
    6. Hunt DM,
    7. Buxton RS
    . 2014. Cyclic-AMP and bacterial cyclic-AMP receptor proteins revisited: adaptation for different ecological niches. Curr Opin Microbiol 18:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2014.01.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Savery NJ,
    2. Lloyd GS,
    3. Kainz M,
    4. Gaal T,
    5. Ross W,
    6. Ebright RH,
    7. Gourse RL,
    8. Busby SJ
    . 1998. Transcription activation at class II CRP-dependent promoters: identification of determinants in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit. EMBO J 17:3439–3447. doi:10.1093/emboj/17.12.3439.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Costache A,
    2. Bucurenci N,
    3. Onu A
    . 2013. Adenylate cyclases involvement in pathogenicity, a minireview. Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol 72:63–86.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lory S,
    2. Wolfgang M,
    3. Lee V,
    4. Smith R
    . 2004. The multi-talented bacterial adenylate cyclases. Int J Med Microbiol 293:479–482. doi:10.1078/1438-4221-00297.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gorke B,
    2. Stulke J
    . 2008. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:613–624. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1932.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Liu L,
    2. Fang H,
    3. Yang H,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Han Y,
    6. Zhou D,
    7. Yang R
    . 2016. CRP is an activator of Yersinia pestis biofilm formation that operates via a mechanism involving gmhA and waaAE-coaD. Front Microbiol 7:295.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Willias SP,
    2. Chauhan S,
    3. Lo CC,
    4. Chain PS,
    5. Motin VL
    . 2015. CRP-mediated carbon catabolite regulation of Yersinia pestis biofilm formation is enhanced by the carbon storage regulator protein, CsrA. PLoS One 10:e0135481. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135481.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ou Q,
    2. Fan J,
    3. Duan D,
    4. Xu L,
    5. Wang J,
    6. Zhou D,
    7. Yang H,
    8. Li B
    . 2017. Involvement of cAMP receptor protein in biofilm formation, fimbria production, capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis and lethality in mouse of Klebsiella pneumoniae serotype K1 causing pyogenic liver abscess. J Med Microbiol 66:1–7. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.000391.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Yang S,
    2. Xu H,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Liu C,
    5. Lu H,
    6. Liu M,
    7. Zhao Y,
    8. Tian B,
    9. Wang L,
    10. Hua Y
    . 2016. Cyclic AMP receptor protein acts as a transcription regulator in response to stresses in Deinococcus radiodurans. PLoS One 11:e0155010. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Silva AJ,
    2. Benitez JA
    . 2004. Transcriptional regulation of Vibrio cholerae hemagglutinin/protease by the cyclic AMP receptor protein and RpoS. J Bacteriol 186:6374–6382. doi:10.1128/JB.186.19.6374-6382.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Skorupski K,
    2. Taylor RK
    . 1997. Cyclic AMP and its receptor protein negatively regulate the coordinate expression of cholera toxin and toxin-coregulated pilus in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:265–270. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.1.265.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lyell NL,
    2. Colton DM,
    3. Bose JL,
    4. Tumen-Velasquez MP,
    5. Kimbrough JH,
    6. Stabb EV
    . 2013. Cyclic AMP receptor protein regulates pheromone-mediated bioluminescence at multiple levels in Vibrio fischeri ES114. J Bacteriol 195:5051–5063. doi:10.1128/JB.00751-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kim CM,
    2. Ahn YJ,
    3. Kim SJ,
    4. Yoon DH,
    5. Shin SH
    . 2016. Temperature change induces the expression of vuuA encoding vulnibactin receptor and crp encoding cyclic AMP receptor protein in Vibrio vulnificus. Curr Microbiol 73:54–64. doi:10.1007/s00284-016-1026-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ross JA,
    2. Trussler RS,
    3. Black MD,
    4. McLellan CR,
    5. Haniford DB
    . 2014. Tn5 transposition in Escherichia coli is repressed by Hfq and activated by over-expression of the small non-coding RNA SgrS. Mob DNA 5:27. doi:10.1186/s13100-014-0027-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Han Y,
    4. Yan Y,
    5. Tan Y,
    6. Zhou L,
    7. Cui Y,
    8. Du Z,
    9. Wang X,
    10. Bi Y,
    11. Yang H,
    12. Song Y,
    13. Zhang P,
    14. Zhou D,
    15. Yang R
    . 2013. Autoregulation of PhoP/PhoQ and positive regulation of the cyclic AMP receptor protein-cyclic AMP complex by PhoP in Yersinia pestis. J Bacteriol 195:1022–1030. doi:10.1128/JB.01530-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lathem WW,
    2. Price PA,
    3. Miller VL,
    4. Goldman WE
    . 2007. A plasminogen-activating protease specifically controls the development of primary pneumonic plague. Science 315:509–513. doi:10.1126/science.1137195.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kim TJ,
    2. Chauhan S,
    3. Motin VL,
    4. Goh EB,
    5. Igo MM,
    6. Young GM
    . 2007. Direct transcriptional control of the plasminogen activator gene of Yersinia pestis by the cyclic AMP receptor protein. J Bacteriol 189:8890–8900. doi:10.1128/JB.00972-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Zhan L,
    2. Yang L,
    3. Zhou L,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Gao H,
    6. Guo Z,
    7. Zhang L,
    8. Qin C,
    9. Zhou D,
    10. Yang R
    . 2009. Direct and negative regulation of the sycO-ypkA-ypoJ operon by cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) in Yersinia pestis. BMC Microbiol 9:178. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Yoong P,
    2. Cywes-Bentley C,
    3. Pier GB
    . 2012. Poly-N-acetylglucosamine expression by wild-type Yersinia pestis is maximal at mammalian, not flea, temperatures. mBio 3:e00217-12. doi:10.1128/mBio.00217-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ritzert JT,
    2. Lathem WW
    . 2018. Depletion of glucose activates catabolite repression during pneumonic plague. J Bacteriol 200:e00737-17. doi:10.1128/JB.00737-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Pechous RD,
    2. Sivaraman V,
    3. Stasulli NM,
    4. Goldman WE
    . 2016. Pneumonic plague: the darker side of Yersinia pestis. Trends Microbiol 24:190–197. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.11.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Deutscher J,
    2. Ake FM,
    3. Derkaoui M,
    4. Zebre AC,
    5. Cao TN,
    6. Bouraoui H,
    7. Kentache T,
    8. Mokhtari A,
    9. Milohanic E,
    10. Joyet P
    . 2014. The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system: regulation by protein phosphorylation and phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interactions. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78:231–256. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00001-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Colton DM,
    2. Stoudenmire JL,
    3. Stabb EV
    . 2015. Growth on glucose decreases cAMP-CRP activity while paradoxically increasing intracellular cAMP in the light-organ symbiont Vibrio fischeri. Mol Microbiol 97:1114–1127. doi:10.1111/mmi.13087.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Townsend PD,
    2. Rodgers TL,
    3. Glover LC,
    4. Korhonen HJ,
    5. Richards SA,
    6. Colwell LJ,
    7. Pohl E,
    8. Wilson MR,
    9. Hodgson DR,
    10. McLeish TC,
    11. Cann MJ
    . 2015. The role of protein-ligand contacts in allosteric regulation of the Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein. J Biol Chem 290:22225–22235. doi:10.1074/jbc.M115.669267.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Nuss AM,
    2. Heroven AK,
    3. Waldmann B,
    4. Reinkensmeier J,
    5. Jarek M,
    6. Beckstette M,
    7. Dersch P
    . 2015. Transcriptomic profiling of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis reveals reprogramming of the Crp regulon by temperature and uncovers Crp as a master regulator of small RNAs. PLoS Genet 11:e1005087. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005087.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Zhan L,
    2. Han Y,
    3. Yang L,
    4. Geng J,
    5. Li Y,
    6. Gao H,
    7. Guo Z,
    8. Fan W,
    9. Li G,
    10. Zhang L,
    11. Qin C,
    12. Zhou D,
    13. Yang R
    . 2008. The cyclic AMP receptor protein, CRP, is required for both virulence and expression of the minimal CRP regulon in Yersinia pestis biovar microtus. Infect Immun 76:5028–5037. doi:10.1128/IAI.00370-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Schiano CA,
    2. Koo JT,
    3. Schipma MJ,
    4. Caulfield AJ,
    5. Jafari N,
    6. Lathem WW
    . 2014. Genome-wide analysis of small RNAs expressed by Yersinia pestis identifies a regulator of the Yop-Ysc type III secretion system. J Bacteriol 196:1659–1670. doi:10.1128/JB.01456-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Bobrov AG,
    2. Kirillina O,
    3. Ryjenkov DA,
    4. Waters CM,
    5. Price PA,
    6. Fetherston JD,
    7. Mack D,
    8. Goldman WE,
    9. Gomelsky M,
    10. Perry RD
    . 2011. Systematic analysis of cyclic di-GMP signalling enzymes and their role in biofilm formation and virulence in Yersinia pestis. Mol Microbiol 79:533–551. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07470.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Bellows LE,
    2. Koestler BJ,
    3. Karaba SM,
    4. Waters CM,
    5. Lathem WW
    . 2012. Hfq-dependent, co-ordinate control of cyclic diguanylate synthesis and catabolism in the plague pathogen Yersinia pestis. Mol Microbiol 86:661–674. doi:10.1111/mmi.12011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Vadyvaloo V,
    2. Jarrett C,
    3. Sturdevant DE,
    4. Sebbane F,
    5. Hinnebusch BJ
    . 2010. Transit through the flea vector induces a pretransmission innate immunity resistance phenotype in Yersinia pestis. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000783. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000783.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Sun YC,
    2. Guo XP,
    3. Hinnebusch BJ,
    4. Darby C
    . 2012. The Yersinia pestis Rcs phosphorelay inhibits biofilm formation by repressing transcription of the diguanylate cyclase gene hmsT. J Bacteriol 194:2020–2026. doi:10.1128/JB.06243-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Liu L,
    2. Fang H,
    3. Yang H,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Han Y,
    6. Zhou D,
    7. Yang R
    . 1 March 2016, posting date. Reciprocal regulation of Yersinia pestis biofilm formation and virulence by RovM and RovA. Open Biol doi:10.1098/rsob.150198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Rebeil R,
    2. Jarrett CO,
    3. Driver JD,
    4. Ernst RK,
    5. Oyston PC,
    6. Hinnebusch BJ
    . 2013. Induction of the Yersinia pestis PhoP-PhoQ regulatory system in the flea and its role in producing a transmissible infection. J Bacteriol 195:1920–1930. doi:10.1128/JB.02000-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Sun F,
    2. Gao H,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Wang L,
    5. Fang N,
    6. Tan Y,
    7. Guo Z,
    8. Xia P,
    9. Zhou D,
    10. Yang R
    . 2012. Fur is a repressor of biofilm formation in Yersinia pestis. PLoS One 7:e52392. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052392.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Kirillina O,
    2. Fetherston JD,
    3. Bobrov AG,
    4. Abney J,
    5. Perry RD
    . 2004. HmsP, a putative phosphodiesterase, and HmsT, a putative diguanylate cyclase, control Hms-dependent biofilm formation in Yersinia pestis. Mol Microbiol 54:75–88. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04253.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Vadyvaloo V,
    2. Viall AK,
    3. Jarrett CO,
    4. Hinz AK,
    5. Sturdevant DE,
    6. Joseph Hinnebusch B
    . 2015. Role of the PhoP-PhoQ gene regulatory system in adaptation of Yersinia pestis to environmental stress in the flea digestive tract. Microbiology 161:1198–1210. doi:10.1099/mic.0.000082.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Ashburner M,
    2. Ball CA,
    3. Blake JA,
    4. Botstein D,
    5. Butler H,
    6. Cherry JM,
    7. Davis AP,
    8. Dolinski K,
    9. Dwight SS,
    10. Eppig JT,
    11. Harris MA,
    12. Hill DP,
    13. Issel-Tarver L,
    14. Kasarskis A,
    15. Lewis S,
    16. Matese JC,
    17. Richardson JE,
    18. Ringwald M,
    19. Rubin GM,
    20. Sherlock G
    . 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25:25–29. doi:10.1038/75556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    The Gene Ontology Consortium. 2019. The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D330–D338. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1055.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Chain PS,
    2. Hu P,
    3. Malfatti SA,
    4. Radnedge L,
    5. Larimer F,
    6. Vergez LM,
    7. Worsham P,
    8. Chu MC,
    9. Andersen GL
    . 2006. Complete genome sequence of Yersinia pestis strains Antiqua and Nepal516: evidence of gene reduction in an emerging pathogen. J Bacteriol 188:4453–4463. doi:10.1128/JB.00124-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Fukuto HS,
    2. Vadyvaloo V,
    3. McPhee JB,
    4. Poinar HN,
    5. Holmes EC,
    6. Bliska JB
    . 2018. A single amino acid change in the response regulator PhoP acquired during Yersinia pestis evolution affects PhoP target gene transcription and polymyxin B susceptibility. J Bacteriol 200:e00050-18. doi:10.1128/JB.00050-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Perry RD,
    2. Fetherston JD
    . 2011. Yersiniabactin iron uptake: mechanisms and role in Yersinia pestis pathogenesis. Microbes Infect 13:808–817. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2011.04.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Bobrov AG,
    2. Kirillina O,
    3. Fosso MY,
    4. Fetherston JD,
    5. Miller MC,
    6. VanCleave TT,
    7. Burlison JA,
    8. Arnold WK,
    9. Lawrenz MB,
    10. Garneau-Tsodikova S,
    11. Perry RD
    . 2017. Zinc transporters YbtX and ZnuABC are required for the virulence of Yersinia pestis in bubonic and pneumonic plague in mice. Metallomics 9:757–772. doi:10.1039/c7mt00126f.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Pechous RD,
    2. Broberg CA,
    3. Stasulli NM,
    4. Miller VL,
    5. Goldman WE
    . 2015. In vivo transcriptional profiling of Yersinia pestis reveals a novel bacterial mediator of pulmonary inflammation. mBio 6:e02302-14. doi:10.1128/mBio.02302-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Fetherston JD,
    2. Kirillina O,
    3. Bobrov AG,
    4. Paulley JT,
    5. Perry RD
    . 2010. The yersiniabactin transport system is critical for the pathogenesis of bubonic and pneumonic plague. Infect Immun 78:2045–2052. doi:10.1128/IAI.01236-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Caulfield AJ,
    2. Walker ME,
    3. Gielda LM,
    4. Lathem WW
    . 2014. The Pla protease of Yersinia pestis degrades fas ligand to manipulate host cell death and inflammation. Cell Host Microbe 15:424–434. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2014.03.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Malan TP,
    2. Kolb A,
    3. Buc H,
    4. McClure WR
    . 1984. Mechanism of CRP-cAMP activation of lac operon transcription initiation activation of the P1 promoter. J Mol Biol 180:881–909. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(84)90262-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Steinsiek S,
    2. Bettenbrock K
    . 2012. Glucose transport in Escherichia coli mutant strains with defects in sugar transport systems. J Bacteriol 194:5897–5908. doi:10.1128/JB.01502-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Atkinson S,
    2. Chang CY,
    3. Patrick HL,
    4. Buckley CM,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Sockett RE,
    7. Camara M,
    8. Williams P
    . 2008. Functional interplay between the Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YpsRI and YtbRI quorum sensing systems modulates swimming motility by controlling expression of flhDC and fliA. Mol Microbiol 69:137–151. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06268.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Bobrov AG,
    2. Bearden SW,
    3. Fetherston JD,
    4. Khweek AA,
    5. Parrish KD,
    6. Perry RD
    . 2007. Functional quorum sensing systems affect biofilm formation and protein expression in Yersinia pestis. Adv Exp Med Biol 603:178–191. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72124-8_15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. LaRock CN,
    2. Yu J,
    3. Horswill AR,
    4. Parsek MR,
    5. Minion FC
    . 2013. Transcriptome analysis of acyl-homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing regulation in Yersinia pestis. PLoS One 8:e62337. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062337.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. 57.↵
    1. Rempe KA,
    2. Hinz AK,
    3. Vadyvaloo V
    . 2012. Hfq regulates biofilm gut blockage that facilitates flea-borne transmission of Yersinia pestis. J Bacteriol 194:2036–2040. doi:10.1128/JB.06568-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Choi KH,
    2. Gaynor JB,
    3. White KG,
    4. Lopez C,
    5. Bosio CM,
    6. Karkhoff-Schweizer RR,
    7. Schweizer HP
    . 2005. A Tn7-based broad-range bacterial cloning and expression system. Nat Methods 2:443–448. doi:10.1038/nmeth765.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. Koo JT,
    2. Alleyne TM,
    3. Schiano CA,
    4. Jafari N,
    5. Lathem WW
    . 2011. Global discovery of small RNAs in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis identifies Yersinia-specific small, noncoding RNAs required for virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:E709–E717. doi:10.1073/pnas.1101655108.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    1. Dobin A,
    2. Davis CA,
    3. Schlesinger F,
    4. Drenkow J,
    5. Zaleski C,
    6. Jha S,
    7. Batut P,
    8. Chaisson M,
    9. Gingeras TR
    . 2013. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    1. Anders S,
    2. Pyl PT,
    3. Huber W
    . 2015. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31:166–169. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    1. Love MI,
    2. Huber W,
    3. Anders S
    . 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Eschenfeldt WH,
    2. Makowska-Grzyska M,
    3. Stols L,
    4. Donnelly MI,
    5. Jedrzejczak R,
    6. Joachimiak A
    . 2013. New LIC vectors for production of proteins from genes containing rare codons. J Struct Funct Genomics 14:135–144. doi:10.1007/s10969-013-9163-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Chen VB,
    2. Arendall WB, III.,
    3. Headd JJ,
    4. Keedy DA,
    5. Immormino RM,
    6. Kapral GJ ,
    7. Murray LW,
    8. Richardson JS,
    9. Richardson DC
    . 2010. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 66:12–21. doi:10.1107/S0907444909042073.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. 65.↵
    1. Shuvalova L
    . 2014. Parallel protein purification. Methods Mol Biol 1140:137–143. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0354-2_10.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.↵
    1. Minor W,
    2. Cymborowski M,
    3. Otwinowski Z,
    4. Chruszcz M
    . 2006. HKL-3000: the integration of data reduction and structure solution–from diffraction images to an initial model in minutes. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 62:859–866. doi:10.1107/S0907444906019949.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. 67.↵
    1. McCoy AJ,
    2. Grosse-Kunstleve RW,
    3. Adams PD,
    4. Winn MD,
    5. Storoni LC,
    6. Read RJ
    . 2007. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40:658–674. doi:10.1107/S0021889807021206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. 68.↵
    1. Winn MD,
    2. Ballard CC,
    3. Cowtan KD,
    4. Dodson EJ,
    5. Emsley P,
    6. Evans PR,
    7. Keegan RM,
    8. Krissinel EB,
    9. Leslie AG,
    10. McCoy A,
    11. McNicholas SJ,
    12. Murshudov GN,
    13. Pannu NS,
    14. Potterton EA,
    15. Powell HR,
    16. Read RJ,
    17. Vagin A,
    18. Wilson KS
    . 2011. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67:235–242. doi:10.1107/S0907444910045749.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 69.↵
    1. Emsley P,
    2. Cowtan K
    . 2004. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60:2126–2132. doi:10.1107/S0907444904019158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. 70.↵
    1. Morris RJ,
    2. Perrakis A,
    3. Lamzin VS
    . 2003. ARP/wARP and automatic interpretation of protein electron density maps. Methods Enzymol 374:229–244. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(03)74011-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. 71.↵
    1. Painter J,
    2. Merritt EA
    . 2006. Optimal description of a protein structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TLS motion. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 62:439–450. doi:10.1107/S0907444906005270.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. 72.↵
    1. Herrero M,
    2. de Lorenzo V,
    3. Timmis KN
    . 1990. Transposon vectors containing non-antibiotic resistance selection markers for cloning and stable chromosomal insertion of foreign genes in gram-negative bacteria. J Bacteriol 172:6557–6567. doi:10.1128/jb.172.11.6557-6567.1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. 73.↵
    1. Mi H,
    2. Huang X,
    3. Muruganujan A,
    4. Tang H,
    5. Mills C,
    6. Kang D,
    7. Thomas PD
    . 2019. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D419–D426. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1038.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    1. Lathem WW,
    2. Crosby SD,
    3. Miller VL,
    4. Goldman WE
    . 2005. Progression of primary pneumonic plague: a mouse model of infection, pathology, and bacterial transcriptional activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:17786–17791. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506840102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. 75.↵
    1. Yu J,
    2. Madsen ML,
    3. Carruthers MD,
    4. Phillips GJ,
    5. Kavanaugh JS,
    6. Boyd JM,
    7. Horswill AR,
    8. Minion FC
    . 2013. Analysis of autoinducer-2 quorum sensing in Yersinia pestis. Infect Immun 81:4053–4062. doi:10.1128/IAI.00880-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. 76.↵
    1. Eschenfeldt WH,
    2. Lucy S,
    3. Millard CS,
    4. Joachimiak A,
    5. Mark ID
    . 2009. A family of LIC vectors for high-throughput cloning and purification of proteins. Methods Mol Biol 498:105–115. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-196-3_7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein Regulates Quorum Sensing and Global Gene Expression in Yersinia pestis during Planktonic Growth and Growth in Biofilms
Jeremy T. Ritzert, George Minasov, Ryan Embry, Matthew J. Schipma, Karla J. F. Satchell
mBio Nov 2019, 10 (6) e02613-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02613-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein Regulates Quorum Sensing and Global Gene Expression in Yersinia pestis during Planktonic Growth and Growth in Biofilms
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein Regulates Quorum Sensing and Global Gene Expression in Yersinia pestis during Planktonic Growth and Growth in Biofilms
Jeremy T. Ritzert, George Minasov, Ryan Embry, Matthew J. Schipma, Karla J. F. Satchell
mBio Nov 2019, 10 (6) e02613-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02613-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Yersinia pestis
plague
CRP
RNA-seq
structure
quorum sensing
biofilms
catabolite repression
cyclic AMP
regulation of gene expression
three-dimensional structure

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511