Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

Staphylococcus aureus Infects Osteoclasts and Replicates Intracellularly

Jennifer L. Krauss, Philip M. Roper, Anna Ballard, Chien-Cheng Shih, James A. J. Fitzpatrick, James E. Cassat, Pei Ying Ng, Nathan J. Pavlos, Deborah J. Veis
Marvin Whiteley, Editor
Jennifer L. Krauss
aDivision of Bone & Mineral Diseases, Musculoskeletal Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip M. Roper
aDivision of Bone & Mineral Diseases, Musculoskeletal Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philip M. Roper
Anna Ballard
aDivision of Bone & Mineral Diseases, Musculoskeletal Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chien-Cheng Shih
bWashington University Center for Cellular Imaging, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James A. J. Fitzpatrick
bWashington University Center for Cellular Imaging, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James E. Cassat
cDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
dDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
eDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
fVanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology and Inflammation (VI4), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
gVanderbilt Center for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James E. Cassat
Pei Ying Ng
hSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan J. Pavlos
hSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nathan J. Pavlos
Deborah J. Veis
aDivision of Bone & Mineral Diseases, Musculoskeletal Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
iDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
jShriners Hospitals for Children, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Deborah J. Veis
Marvin Whiteley
Georgia Institute of Technology School of Biological Sciences
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02447-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    S. aureus resides within osteoclasts (OCs) in vivo and in vitro. (A) Confocal microscopy of histological sections reveals internalized GFP+ S. aureus inside TRAPRed OCs within mouse calvarium (yellow puncta) 24 h postinfection (hpi). (B) OCs differentiated from bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) with 3 days of RANKL and M-CSF on devitalized bone, infected, and treated with gentamicin also harbor S. aureus (green puncta) 18 hpi. (C) TRAP staining of BMMs differentiated toward OCs for up to 3 days showing multiple TRAP+ mononuclear cells at day 2 (D2) and numerous TRAP+ multinuclear fully differentiated OCs at D3. (D) Enumerated CFU grown on tryptic soy agar from lysates of BMMs differentiated toward OCs for up to 3 days and infected with S. aureus for 18 h, with gentamicin killing of extracellular bacteria. Values that are significantly different from the values at D0 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc test are indicated as follows: ****, P < 0.0001. n = 3 technical replicates, representative of >5 biological replicates.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    S. aureus proliferates within OCs in vitro in a RANKL-induced Osteoclastogenesis-dependent manner. BMMs were treated with RANKL for up to 3 days and subjected to the gentamicin protection assay. (A) CFU from lysates of infected cells after OC differentiation for 0, 2, or 3 days. Cells were lysed immediately after gentamicin exposure (1.5 hpi) or after an additional 16.5 h in osteoclastogenic media (D2, D3) or control media (D0). n = 3 technical replicates, representative of >5 biological replicates. (B) CFU from lysates of infected human CD14+ monocytes isolated from peripheral blood and differentiated into OCs for 3 days before infection. n = 3 biological replicates. (C) CFU from lysates of infected BMMs after exposure for 2 days to either PBS, RANKL, IFN-γ, or IL-4. n = 3 technical replicates, representative of 3 biological replicates. (D) BMMs harvested from NFATc1 conditional knockout animals (cKO) show no basal (D0) or induced (D2) NFATc1 protein by Western blotting compared to littermate control mice BMMs (Ctrl). (E) TRAP staining after 3 days of RANKL exposure demonstrates failure of NFATc1-cKO BMMs to form TRAP+ multinuclear OCs. (F) CFU from lysates of Ctrl or NFATc1 cKO BMMs differentiated into OCs for 0 or 2 days and subjected to the gentamicin protection assay. All bars represent 18 h postinfection (hpi). White bars, Ctrl; black bars, NFATc1 cKO cells. (G) CFU from lysates of wild-type (WT) BMMs transfected with empty vector (pMX-EV [white bars]) or NFATc1-overexpressing vector (pMX-NFAT [black bars]) at 18 hpi, showing positive effect of NFATc1 at D2. (H) Rosiglitazone treatment of WT BMMs increases NFATc1 induction more than RANKL alone as measured by Western blotting of nuclear extracts. H3, histone 3 antibody. (I) CFU from lysates of WT BMMs treated with Rosiglitazone (+ROSI [black bars]) or untreated (-ROSI [white bars]) at 18 hpi. n = 3 biological replicates. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc test (A, C, F, G, and I) or Student’s t test (B).

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Alternative NF-κB in OCs promotes intracellular S. aureus replication in vitro. (A and B) BMMs harvested from NIK knockout mice (Nik−/− [black bars]) (A) and RelB knockout mice (Relb−/− [black bars]) (B) were differentiated into OCs for 0, 2, or 3 days and subjected to the gentamicin protection assay. CFU of intracellular S. aureus proliferation were examined at 18 hpi. (C) TRAP-stained images of WT or Relb−/− BMMs transduced with empty vector (EV) or NFATc1-overexpressing virus (NFAT) and differentiated for 48 h. (D) Western blot of NFATc1 protein expression from WT or Relb−/− (KO) BMMs transduced with EV or NFAT and differentiated with RANKL for 0 (D0) or 2 (D2) days. (E) WT or Relb−/− (KO) cells transduced with EV or NFAT virus, differentiated in RANKL for 3 days, infected with S. aureus, and subjected to the gentamicin protection assay. Bars represent CFU of lysates at 18hpi. n = 3 biological replicates. Statistical significance: in panels A and B, ****, P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc test; in panel E,**, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc test.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    S. aureus proliferates within individual OCs to different magnitudes. (A) Images depict representative OCs infected with GFP+ S. aureus (green) and lysosomes labeled with LysoTracker (red). Outlines indicate cell boundaries. White arrows track the formation of intracellular GFP+ S. aureus within vesicles over the indicated time frames. Insets represent higher magnified images of enumerated white boxes. Bars = 20 μm and 5 μm within image and insert panels, respectively. (B) Offset histogram of flow cytometric data from infected cells differentiated in RANKL for 0 or 2 days and then infected with GFP+ S. aureus at an MOI of 1:1. Infected cells were detected by an increased signal in the FITC channel. The threshold for FITC+ is depicted by the dashed line, based on cells infected with GFP-labeled bacteria. n = 3 biological replicates. (C) Infected cells (GFP+) are shown as a percentage of total cells, as measured via flow cytometry. (D) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) as measured from the FITC+ fraction of cells via flow cytometry. **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc test. (E) Transmission electron micrograph of dividing S. aureus in a membrane-bound compartment inside an OC.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Significant percentage of OCs do not have high S. aureus colocalization with lysosomes. Confocal microscopy images of OCs at 2 or 18 h after being infected with GFP+ S. aureus. (A and B) Images show GFP+ S. aureus (green), lysosomes (LysoTracker, red), F-actin (turquoise), and nuclei (blue) within OCs. Enumerated inserts represent higher magnified images (C). (D) The cross-correlation analysis of the peaks of green (S. aureus) and red (LysoTracker) fluorescence intensity from the line scans (C1 to C3, white lines) is represented with the corresponding Pearson’s coefficient (Rr). (E) A bar graph depicting the percentage of OCs exhibiting either a strong, moderate, or partial degree of GFP+ S. aureus-LysoTracker colocalization as based on their respective Pearson’s coefficient (Rr). n = 3 biological replicates with 20 to 30 OCs counted per field. Bars = 10 μm.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • FIG S1

    Osteoclasts show increased intracellular bacterial load 18 hours after S. aureus infection by lysostaphin protection assay. Colony-forming units (CFU) from lysates of OCs differentiated for 0, 2, or 3 days (D0, D2, or D3, respectively) and subjected to the lysostaphin protection assay after infection with S. aureus. Lysates were harvested at 18 hours postinfection. **, P = 0.0014; ****, P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc analysis. n = 3 biological replicates. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Krauss et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    OCs grown on bone chips in vitro allow S. aureus replication similar to OCs grown on plastic. Colony-forming units (CFU) from lysates of OCs grown on bone chips for 5 days and subjected to the gentamicin protection assay after infection with S. aureus, harvested at 1.5 or 18 hours postinfection (hpi). **, P < 0.01 by t test. n = 3 biological replicates. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Krauss et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S1

    Increased S. aureus colony formation is not the result of an increased extracellular bacterial load. Colony-forming units (CFU) from sampled media during the course of the gentamicin protection assay. Samples taken from the media of cells differentiated into OCs for 0 (D0) or 2 (D2) days at 12, 15, or 18 h postinfection (hpi). Colonies are listed as total number of colonies formed (#) and the CFU (log) after 1,000-fold dilution. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.2 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Krauss et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • MOVIE S1

    GFP+ S. aureus signal increases over time within a single osteoclast. A time-lapse video depicts a single infected osteoclast over 810 minutes. The GFP signal of the GFP+ S. aureus appears within vacuoles and increases over that time and does not appear to colocalize with the LysoTracker Red (white arrows). Images were captured at 30-min intervals and played back at five frames per second. Download Movie S1, MOV file, 1.3 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Krauss et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    S. aureus in OCs on bone is not exclusively in lysosomes. Confocal microscopy images of BMMs differentiated into OCs on bone slices and then infected with GFP+ S. aureus, imaged at 2 hpi or 18 hpi in the indicated planes. GFP+ S. aureus (green), lysosomes (LysoTracker [red]), F-actin (turquoise), and nuclei (blue). OC at 18 hpi is the same as shown in Fig. 1B, with LysoTracker added and different pseudocolor. Scale bars = 10μm. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 2.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Krauss et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Staphylococcus aureus Infects Osteoclasts and Replicates Intracellularly
Jennifer L. Krauss, Philip M. Roper, Anna Ballard, Chien-Cheng Shih, James A. J. Fitzpatrick, James E. Cassat, Pei Ying Ng, Nathan J. Pavlos, Deborah J. Veis
mBio Oct 2019, 10 (5) e02447-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02447-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Staphylococcus aureus Infects Osteoclasts and Replicates Intracellularly
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Staphylococcus aureus Infects Osteoclasts and Replicates Intracellularly
Jennifer L. Krauss, Philip M. Roper, Anna Ballard, Chien-Cheng Shih, James A. J. Fitzpatrick, James E. Cassat, Pei Ying Ng, Nathan J. Pavlos, Deborah J. Veis
mBio Oct 2019, 10 (5) e02447-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02447-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Staphylococcus aureus
bone
osteoclasts
osteomyelitis
RANKL
intracellular bacteria

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511