Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

The Microbiota Promotes Arterial Thrombosis in Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Deficient Mice

Klytaimnistra Kiouptsi, Sven Jäckel, Giulia Pontarollo, Alexandra Grill, Marijke J. E. Kuijpers, Eivor Wilms, Christian Weber, Felix Sommer, Magdolna Nagy, Carlos Neideck, Yvonne Jansen, Stefanie Ascher, Henning Formes, Cornelia Karwot, Franziska Bayer, Bettina Kollar, Saravanan Subramaniam, Michael Molitor, Philip Wenzel, Philip Rosenstiel, Hristo Todorov, Susanne Gerber, Ulrich Walter, Kerstin Jurk, Johan W. M. Heemskerk, Emiel P. C. van der Vorst, Yvonne Döring, Christoph Reinhardt
Federico Rey, Invited Editor, Nancy A. Moran, Editor
Klytaimnistra Kiouptsi
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven Jäckel
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
bGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giulia Pontarollo
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra Grill
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
bGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marijke J. E. Kuijpers
cDepartment of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eivor Wilms
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Weber
dInstitute of Cardiovascular Prevention, Department of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
eGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felix Sommer
fInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology (IKMB), Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Felix Sommer
Magdolna Nagy
cDepartment of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Neideck
cDepartment of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
dInstitute of Cardiovascular Prevention, Department of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yvonne Jansen
dInstitute of Cardiovascular Prevention, Department of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefanie Ascher
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henning Formes
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cornelia Karwot
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franziska Bayer
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bettina Kollar
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saravanan Subramaniam
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Molitor
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
bGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, Mainz, Germany
gCenter for Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Wenzel
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
bGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, Mainz, Germany
gCenter for Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Rosenstiel
fInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology (IKMB), Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hristo Todorov
hInstitute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susanne Gerber
hInstitute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Walter
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
bGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerstin Jurk
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
bGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan W. M. Heemskerk
cDepartment of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emiel P. C. van der Vorst
dInstitute of Cardiovascular Prevention, Department of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
eGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yvonne Döring
dInstitute of Cardiovascular Prevention, Department of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
eGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
iDivision of Angiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Reinhardt
aCenter for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
bGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christoph Reinhardt
Federico Rey
University of Wisconsin—Madison
Roles: Invited Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nancy A. Moran
University of Texas at Austin
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02298-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    HFD feeding promotes microbiota dysbiosis in Ldlr−/− mice as revealed by cecal 16S ribosomal DNA amplicon sequencing. (A) Principal coordinate analysis reveals distinct separation in microbiota composition due to diet (P = 0.003 for control diet [CD] versus high-fat diet [HFD]). LDLR, LDL receptor. (B) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA score) effect size (LEfSe) highlights differentially abundant microbial taxa (CD versus HFD). (C and D) Reduced alpha diversity in HFD versus CD using Chao richness (C) and Shannon entropy (D) metrics. (E) HFD-induced changes in microbiome composition on the phylum level. (F) Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in CD and HFD samples. In panels A, C, D, and F, the sex of the mice fed CD (triangles) and HFD (circles) is color coded (females [red] and males [blue]). In panels C, D, and F, means ± standard errors of the means (SEM) (error bars) are shown for the groups. Independent samples from mice fed HFD versus CD were compared by Student t tests, and values that were significantly different are indicated by bars and asterisks as follows: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Familial hypercholesterolemia is increased in GF Ldlr−/− mice on control diet (CD), but both cholesterol levels and atherosclerotic lesion size in the carotid artery are unchanged after 16 weeks on high-fat diet (HFD) for GF Ldlr−/− and CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice. (A and B) Total cholesterol level and fractioned cholesterol levels (VLDL, LDL, and HDL) of GF Ldlr−/− and CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice on CD (8 CONV-R mice; 6 GF mice) (A) and HFD (9 mice/group) (B). For the chromatogram, representative lipoprotein profiles detected in CONV-R (black lines) and GF (purple lines) mice are shown. OD, optical density. (C, left) Representative histology images showing hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained sections of carotid artery plaques in GF and CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice on HFD. Bars, 1 mm. (Right) Relative atherosclerotic plaque size (as a percentage) of the carotid artery of GF (17 mice [9 females and 8 males]) and CONV-R (17 mice [10 females and 7 males]) Ldlr−/− mice after 16 weeks on a HFD, split by sex. Means ± SEM (error bars) are shown for the groups. Independent samples were compared by Student t tests. Values that were significantly different are indicated by bars and asterisks as follows: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. Values that were not significantly different (n.s.) are indicated. (D and E) Correlation between age and the absolute plaque size (in square micrometers) (D) or relative plaque size (as a percentage) (E) at the carotid artery. For all panels, data for CONV-R mice are shown as gray dots, and data for GF animals are shown as white dots. The sex of the mice is color coded as follows: females in red and males in blue.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    GF Ldlr−/− mice show reduced vascular inflammation after 16 weeks on HFD. (A to D) Blood cell counts of total leukocytes (18 or 19 mice/group) (A) and percentage of CD45+ cells: monocytes (16 to 18 mice/group) (B), neutrophils (15 to 19 mice/group) (C), and lymphocytes (18 or 19 mice/group) (D) from GF and CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice on HFD for 16 weeks, analyzed by flow cytometry. Means ± SEM (error bars) are shown for the groups. (E) Multiplex cytokine ELISA quantification of mouse plasma samples (6 to 16 mice/group). (F) Intravital epifluorescence video microscopy of endothelial adherent and rolling leukocytes (green) in the common carotid artery of GF and CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice on HFD for 16 weeks (11 to 16 mice/group). Nucleated cells were visualized with acridine orange. Means ± SEM are shown for the groups. Independent samples were compared by Student t tests. Statistical significance: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. For all panels, data for CONV-R mice are shown in gray, and data for GF animals are shown in white. For panels A to D, the sex of the mice is color coded as follows: females in red and males in blue.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Reduced FeCl3-induced carotid artery occlusion in GF C57BL/6J mice and reduced plaque rupture-induced thrombogenicity in GF Ldlr−/− mice. (A) Intravital epifluorescence video microscopy of thrombus formation (DCF-stained platelets [green]) at 0, 6, and 12 min in the 10% FeCl3-injured common carotid artery of GF (12 mice) and CONV-R (13 mice) C57BL/6J wild-type mice (representative images) with analysis of occlusion times. (B) Intravital epifluorescence video microscopy of thrombus formation (Rhodamin B-stained platelets [red]) in the common carotid artery of GF (7 mice) and CONV-R (13 mice) Ldlr−/− mice on HFD after plaque rupture induced by 5 min of ultrasound. Means ± SEM are shown for the groups. Independent samples were analyzed by Student t tests. Statistical significance was indicated by asterisks as follows: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. For all panels, CONV-R mice are shown in gray, and GF animals are shown as white dots.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Standardized whole-blood flow chamber analysis for platelet deposition on collagen type I (A) and collagen type III (B). End-stage representative images of whole-blood platelet deposits after 3.5 min on collagen type I (A), and collagen type III (B). (C) Subtraction heatmap of HFD-fed GF Ldlr−/− mice (12 mice/group) compared to CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice (11 mice/group) (not shown). The degree of reduction relative to CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice is indicated in green (see scale panel). The analyzed parameters are as follows: 1, morphological score; 2, platelet surface area coverage; 3, thrombus contraction score; 4, multilayer score; 5, thrombus surface area coverage; 6, phosphatidylserine exposure; 7, P-selectin expression; 8, integrin αIIbβ3 (GPIIbIIIa) activation. (D and E) Descriptive statistics of HFD-fed GF and CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice on collagen type I (D) and collagen type III (E) are shown only for significant results. Means ± SEM are shown for the groups. Independent samples were tested by Student t tests. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: *, P < 0.05; ****, P < 0.0001. For all panels, data for CONV-R mice are shown as gray dots, and data for GF animals are shown as white dots. The sex of the mice is color coded as follows: females in red and males in blue.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Effects of gut microbiota on late carotid artery atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis. (A) For this study, either GF or CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice on a conventional diet (CD) were fed for 16 weeks with a high-fat diet (HFD), thus resulting in the onset and progression of atherosclerosis. For CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice, the HFD yielded a reduced diversity of the commensal microbiota, with an increase in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio. Interestingly, when fed with a CD, GF Ldlr−/− mice presented higher cholesterol levels with respect to CONV-R counterparts. (B) After cholesterol accumulation, resulting from deposition of VLDL and LDL lipoproteins, an atherosclerotic plaque presents a subendothelial lipid core with infiltrating leukocytes characterized by the accumulation of smooth muscle cells (SMC) from the tunica intima and tunica adventitia of the blood vessels. Although the relative plaque sizes at the carotid artery were unchanged between the two groups, GF animals showed altered vascular inflammatory parameters and immune cell populations. EC, endothelial cells. (C) During atherothrombosis, the plaque rupture yields to platelet deposition to the exposed subendothelial collagen, and subsequently to a bloodstream-circulating thrombus growing on the platelet plug. In this context, GF Ldlr−/− mice fed with a HFD presented lower yields of plaque rupture, collagen adhesion, and thrombus growth. Arterial occlusion time was increased in CD-fed GF C57BL/6J mice compared to CONV-R controls.

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • FIG S1

    Sterility controls on the feces from GF Ldlr−/− mice. Lane 1, molecular weight DNA marker; lane 2, feces from GF Ldlr−/− mice; lane 3, positive 16S rDNA control; lane 4, negative (empty) control. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.03 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Kiouptsi et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Taxon summary on the genus level. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.2 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Kiouptsi et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S1

    Differences in microbial taxa between HFD and CD mice. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.03 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Kiouptsi et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    High-frequency small animal ultrasound of both carotids of GF and CONV-R mice 8 weeks after HFD or CD. (A) Representative ultrasound B-images of the carotid arteries of HFD mice. (B) Measurement of the wall thickness of the anterior carotid wall from the right (RCC) and left common carotid (LCC) arteries. (C) Cumulative atherosclerotic plaque size of RCC (right) and LCC (left) in B-mode. Mean plus SEM (error bars) are shown for the groups (2 to 5 mice per group). For panels B and C, CONV-R mice are shown by gray bars, and GF animals are shown in white bars. Independent samples were tested by Student t test. **, P < 0.01. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.3 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Kiouptsi et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    Absolute (μm2) and relative (%) values for atherosclerotic plaque area at the carotid artery and aortic root (zero-level) of the 40 CONV-R (gray) and GF (white) animals fed for 16 weeks with HFD. Animals are color coded as in Fig. 2C and D: males are shown in blue, while females are shown in red. Download Table S2, PDF file, 0.04 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Kiouptsi et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S4

    (A) Standardized whole-blood flow chamber analysis for platelet deposition on collagen type I and collagen type III. (A) Subtraction heatmap of control diet (CD)-fed GF Ldlr−/− mice (14 mice/group) compared to CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice (12 mice/group). The degree of reduction relative to CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice is indicated in green. The numbers below the panels indicate the following parameters: 1, morphological score; 2, platelet surface area coverage; 3, thrombus contraction score; 4, multilayer score; 5, thrombus surface area coverage; 6, phosphatidylserine exposure; 7, P-selectin expression; 8, integrin αIIbβ3 (GPIIbIIIa) activation. Independent samples were tested by Student t tests. *, P < 0.05. (B and C) End-stage representative images of whole-blood platelet deposits after 3.5 min on collagen type I (B) and collagen type III (C). Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.7 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Kiouptsi et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S5

    Descriptive statistics on the standardized whole-blood flow chamber analysis for platelet deposition of HFD-fed GF Ldlr−/− and CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice on collagen type I and collagen type III. Means ± SEM are shown for groups. For all the panels, CONV-R animals are shown as black dots, while GF animals are shown as white dots. Download FIG S5, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Kiouptsi et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S6

    Descriptive statistics on the standardized whole-blood flow chamber analysis for platelet deposition of CD-fed (control diet fed) GF Ldlr−/− and CONV-R Ldlr−/− mice on collagen type I and collagen type III. Means ± SEM are shown. Independent samples were tested by Student t tests. **, P < 0.01. For all the panels, CONV-R animals are shown as black triangles, while GF animals are shown as white triangles. Download FIG S6, PDF file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Kiouptsi et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TEXT S1

    Commands. Download TEXT S1, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Kiouptsi et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Microbiota Promotes Arterial Thrombosis in Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Deficient Mice
Klytaimnistra Kiouptsi, Sven Jäckel, Giulia Pontarollo, Alexandra Grill, Marijke J. E. Kuijpers, Eivor Wilms, Christian Weber, Felix Sommer, Magdolna Nagy, Carlos Neideck, Yvonne Jansen, Stefanie Ascher, Henning Formes, Cornelia Karwot, Franziska Bayer, Bettina Kollar, Saravanan Subramaniam, Michael Molitor, Philip Wenzel, Philip Rosenstiel, Hristo Todorov, Susanne Gerber, Ulrich Walter, Kerstin Jurk, Johan W. M. Heemskerk, Emiel P. C. van der Vorst, Yvonne Döring, Christoph Reinhardt
mBio Oct 2019, 10 (5) e02298-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02298-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Microbiota Promotes Arterial Thrombosis in Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Deficient Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Microbiota Promotes Arterial Thrombosis in Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Deficient Mice
Klytaimnistra Kiouptsi, Sven Jäckel, Giulia Pontarollo, Alexandra Grill, Marijke J. E. Kuijpers, Eivor Wilms, Christian Weber, Felix Sommer, Magdolna Nagy, Carlos Neideck, Yvonne Jansen, Stefanie Ascher, Henning Formes, Cornelia Karwot, Franziska Bayer, Bettina Kollar, Saravanan Subramaniam, Michael Molitor, Philip Wenzel, Philip Rosenstiel, Hristo Todorov, Susanne Gerber, Ulrich Walter, Kerstin Jurk, Johan W. M. Heemskerk, Emiel P. C. van der Vorst, Yvonne Döring, Christoph Reinhardt
mBio Oct 2019, 10 (5) e02298-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02298-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

gut microbiota
germfree
low-density lipoprotein receptor
arterial thrombosis
atherothrombosis
carotid artery
atherosclerosis
microbiota
platelets
vascular inflammation

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511