Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Molecular Biology and Physiology

Vibrio cholerae CsrA Directly Regulates varA To Increase Expression of the Three Nonredundant Csr Small RNAs

Heidi A. Butz, Alexandra R. Mey, Ashley L. Ciosek, Shelley M. Payne
Edward G. Ruby, Editor
Heidi A. Butz
aDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra R. Mey
aDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashley L. Ciosek
aDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shelley M. Payne
aDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward G. Ruby
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01042-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Supplemental Material
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Csr system in V. cholerae. (A) The two-component system VarS and VarA regulates the activity of CsrA. The inner membrane protein VarS is a sensor kinase that activates VarA via phosphorylation. Activated VarA binds to the promoters of three small RNAs, namely, CsrB, CsrC, and CsrD (CsrB/C/D, or the Csr sRNAs), to induce their transcription; the portion of the Csr sRNA promoters indicated in green represents the VarA recognition sequence. When expressed, CsrB/C/D act to sequester CsrA, antagonizing the activity of CsrA. The data determined in the present study indicate that CsrA directly binds to varA mRNA to positively regulate protein expression, introducing a regulatory feedback loop in the Var/Csr pathway in V. cholerae. (B) The RNA folding program mFold was used to generate the secondary structures of CsrB/C/D. The GGA CsrA-binding sites are highlighted by the red lettering.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    The Csr sRNA levels, but not the CsrA protein levels, change in response to NRES. (A) The wild-type strain, N16961, harboring a V5 epitope tagged CsrA, was grown in minimal medium with and without NRES, and whole-cell proteins were resolved and immunoblotted with anti-V5 antiserum. (B) The total abundance, shown in arbitrary units (A.U.), of each Csr sRNA was determined by the use of standard curves. #, <1 A.U. of CsrC in minimal medium. The P values were determined by an unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test from the A.U. values (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). The normalized means and standard deviations (error bars) were calculated from three biological replicates. (C) Relative proportions of CsrB/C/D present when the wild-type strain was grown in the absence and presence of NRES. The amount of Csr sRNA present in the experiment whose results are presented in panel B was converted to a percentage. (D) The rate of decay for CsrB, CsrC, and CsrD was measured by qRT-PCR from wild-type cells grown to mid-log phase in minimal medium supplemented with NRES. Rifampin was added to stop transcription, and cells were harvested immediately after rifampin addition (t = 0) and at 4, 8, 16, and 64 min after rifampin addition. The half-lives, along with the 95% confidence intervals (C.I.), were determined using one-phase decay analysis (a nonlinear regression method) and GraphPad Prism 7 software. The extra sum-of-squares F test was used to compare the decay rate constants determined for the sample sets (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    NcsrC-only has increased CsrA activity in minimal medium. (A) N16961, NcsrB-only, NcsrC-only, and NcsrD-only were grown in minimal medium with and without NRES. Whole-cell proteins were resolved and immunoblotted with anti-ToxR antiserum (top panel) or stained with Coomassie blue (bottom panel). The proteins in both the immunoblot and Coomassie-stained gel were from the same samples and are representative of results from at least three biological replicates. (B to D) CsrB (B), CsrC (C), and CsrD (D) expression levels were examined by qRT-PCR in strain N16961 and strains NcsrB-only, NcsrC-only, and NcsrD-only, respectively. All strains were grown as described for panel A. The levels of CsrB/C/D were normalized to the internal control secA level. In each panel, the wild-type (WT) level seen in the absence of NRES is set to a value of 1. The P values were determined by an unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test from the ΔCT values (*, P < 0.05), comparing N16961 to the indicated mutant and comparing the levels of growth in minimal medium with or without NRES. Differences that are statistically significant are indicated on the figures. The relative means and standard deviations (error bars) were calculated from three biological replicates.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    CsrA positively affects the expression of the csr sRNAs. CsrB (A), CsrC (B), and CsrD (C) expression levels were examined by qRT-PCR in N16961 (WT), NcsrA.R6H (csrA mutant), and the complemented strain NcsrA.R6H/pFcsrA (csrA mutant/pFcsrA). All strains were grown in minimal medium with and without NRES. The levels of CsrB/C/D were normalized to the internal control secA level. In each panel, the WT level seen in the absence of NRES is set to a value of 1. The P values were determined by an unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test from the ΔCT values (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001). The relative means and standard deviations (error bars) were calculated from four biological replicates.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    CsrA positively affects the transcription of the csr sRNA genes. The activities of the full-length promoter fusions (A) and the truncated promoter fusions (B) for CsrB, CsrC, and CsrD were measured in the NlacZ::kan (WT) and NcsrA.R6H.lacZ::kan (csrA mutant) strains. The truncated fusions lack 50 nucleotides on the 5′ end encompassing the VarA-binding site, shown as the light blue segment in the schematic. The means are plotted, and the error bars represent standard deviations of data from three biological replicates. The P values were calculated using the unpaired t test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    CsrA positively affects the level of VarA and binds directly to the varA mRNA. (A) NvarA-V5 (WT), NcsrA.R6H.varA-V5 (csrA mutant), and NcsrA.R6H.varA-V5/pFcsrA (csrA mutant/pFcsrA) were grown in minimal medium supplemented with NRES. Cells were harvested at mid-log phase, and whole-cell proteins were resolved and immunoblotted with anti-V5 antiserum. The immunoblot is representative of results from at least three biological replicates. (B) The RNA EMSA was performed with purified CsrA, the negative-control 5′ biotinylated atpI RNA, and the 5′ biotinylated varA RNA. The highest concentration of CsrA in the gradient was 40 nM, followed by 8 nM and 1.6 nM. (C) The sequence of the varA oligonucleotide used for the RNA EMSA whose results are presented in panel B. The closed arrow is positioned above the annotated start of translation UUG (61), and GGA motifs are indicated in red and underlined. (D) In vivo CsrA-RNA immunoprecipitation showing that the varA transcript was enriched ∼5-fold in the immunoprecipitated (IP) sample compared to the input RNA population. The P values were determined by an unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test from the ΔCT values (**, P < 0.01). (E) The varA transcriptional reporter, pQFvarA.TS, includes the varA promoter sequence (−301 to −1 relative to the transcriptional start site, blue bar) fused to lacZ, while the varA translational fusion, pQEvarA.TL, includes the 5′ UTR and 73 amino acids of the coding sequence (−1 to +312 relative to the start of transcription, orange bar) as indicated in the schematic below the panel. The translational fusion uses the plasmid T5 promoter. The open arrow represents the start of transcription, while the closed arrow indicates the start of translation. The activity of these reporters was measured in the NlacZ::kan (WT) and NcsrA.R6H.lacZ::kan (csrA mutant) strains. IPTG (100 μM) was present in the growth medium during testing of the translational reporter. To generate the plotted means and standard deviations (error bars), three biological replicates were used for the transcriptional reporter, and four biological replicates were used for the translational reporter. The P values were calculated using the unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test (ns, not significant; ***, P < 0.001; bd, below detection).

Supplemental Material

  • Figures
  • FIG S1

    V5-tagged CsrA restores ToxR expression in NcsrA.R6H. N16961, NcsrA.R6H, NcsrA.R6H/pFcsrA, and NcsrA.R6H/pFcsrA-V5 were grown in minimal medium with and without NRES. Cells were harvested at mid-log phase and resuspended in LB sample buffer, and whole-cell proteins were resolved by 10% polyacrylamide SDS-PAGE. The gels were processed and immunoblotted with anti-ToxR antiserum. Download FIG S1, EPS file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Butz et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S2

    Verification of priming efficiency in RT and qPCR. (A) Total abundance of each Csr sRNA shown in raw nanograms (ng). To ensure that the RT priming efficiencies were the same for all three sRNAs, a specific probe that binds to identical sequences in the 3′ end of all three sRNAs was used. The abundance of each was determined by standard curves. The P values were determined by an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test using the raw nanogram values (**, P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001). The means and standard deviations (error bars) were calculated from three biological replicates. (B) Priming efficiency for qPCR analysis of the cDNA as described in the panel A legend. The slope, R2 value, and percentage of efficiency determined for each of the primer sets, which were extrapolated from their respective standard curves, are shown. Download FIG S2, EPS file, 0.10 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Butz et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • FIG S3

    Guide tree of the Csr sRNAs from multiple bacterial species. The DNA sequences of the csr sRNA genes from the indicated species were aligned through multiple ClustalW analyses. Download FIG S3, EPS file, 0.1 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Butz et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S1

    Strains and plasmids. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Butz et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

  • TABLE S2

    Primers. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB.

    Copyright © 2019 Butz et al.

    This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Vibrio cholerae CsrA Directly Regulates varA To Increase Expression of the Three Nonredundant Csr Small RNAs
Heidi A. Butz, Alexandra R. Mey, Ashley L. Ciosek, Shelley M. Payne
mBio Jun 2019, 10 (3) e01042-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01042-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vibrio cholerae CsrA Directly Regulates varA To Increase Expression of the Three Nonredundant Csr Small RNAs
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Vibrio cholerae CsrA Directly Regulates varA To Increase Expression of the Three Nonredundant Csr Small RNAs
Heidi A. Butz, Alexandra R. Mey, Ashley L. Ciosek, Shelley M. Payne
mBio Jun 2019, 10 (3) e01042-19; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01042-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

CsrA
CsrB
ToxR
VarA
Vibrio cholerae
sRNA

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511