Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
mBio
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • Topics
    • Applied and Environmental Science
    • Clinical Science and Epidemiology
    • Ecological and Evolutionary Science
    • Host-Microbe Biology
    • Molecular Biology and Physiology
    • Therapeutics and Prevention
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About mBio
    • Editor in Chief
    • Board of Editors
    • AAM Fellows
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
Research Article | Host-Microbe Biology

RNA Structure Duplication in the Dengue Virus 3′ UTR: Redundancy or Host Specificity?

Luana de Borba, Sergio M. Villordo, Franco L. Marsico, Juan M. Carballeda, Claudia V. Filomatori, Leopoldo G. Gebhard, Horacio M. Pallarés, Sebastian Lequime, Louis Lambrechts, Irma Sánchez Vargas, Carol D. Blair, Andrea V. Gamarnik
Carolyn B. Coyne, Editor
Luana de Borba
aFundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergio M. Villordo
aFundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franco L. Marsico
aFundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan M. Carballeda
aFundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia V. Filomatori
aFundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leopoldo G. Gebhard
aFundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Horacio M. Pallarés
aFundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Lequime
cInsect-Virus Interactions Group, Department of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
dEvolutionary Genomics, Modeling and Health, Unité Mixte de Recherche 2000, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France
eKU Leuven Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, Laboratory of Clinical and Epidemiological Virology, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louis Lambrechts
cInsect-Virus Interactions Group, Department of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
dEvolutionary Genomics, Modeling and Health, Unité Mixte de Recherche 2000, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Louis Lambrechts
Irma Sánchez Vargas
bArthropod-borne and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol D. Blair
bArthropod-borne and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea V. Gamarnik
aFundación Instituto Leloir-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn B. Coyne
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariano Garcia Blanco
University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston
Roles: Solicited external reviewer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Sarnow
Stanford University School of Medicine
Roles: Solicited external reviewer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02506-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Flaviviruses include a diverse group of medically important viruses that cycle between mosquitoes and humans. During this natural process of switching hosts, each species imposes different selective forces on the viral population. Using dengue virus (DENV) as model, we found that paralogous RNA structures originating from duplications in the viral 3′ untranslated region (UTR) are under different selective pressures in the two hosts. These RNA structures, known as dumbbells (DB1 and DB2), were originally proposed to be enhancers of viral replication. Analysis of viruses obtained from infected mosquitoes showed selection of mutations that mapped in DB2. Recombinant viruses carrying the identified variations confirmed that these mutations greatly increase viral replication in mosquito cells, with low or no impact in human cells. Use of viruses lacking each of the DB structures revealed opposite viral phenotypes. While deletion of DB1 reduced viral replication about 10-fold, viruses lacking DB2 displayed a great increase of fitness in mosquitoes, confirming a functional diversification of these similar RNA elements. Mechanistic analysis indicated that DB1 and DB2 differentially modulate viral genome cyclization and RNA replication. We found that a pseudoknot formed within DB2 competes with long-range RNA-RNA interactions that are necessary for minus-strand RNA synthesis. Our results support a model in which a functional diversification of duplicated RNA elements in the viral 3′ UTR is driven by host-specific requirements. This study provides new ideas for understanding molecular aspects of the evolution of RNA viruses that naturally jump between different species.

IMPORTANCE Flaviviruses constitute the most relevant group of arthropod-transmitted viruses, including important human pathogens such as the dengue, Zika, yellow fever, and West Nile viruses. The natural alternation of these viruses between vertebrate and invertebrate hosts shapes the viral genome population, which leads to selection of different viral variants with potential implications for epidemiological fitness and pathogenesis. However, the selective forces and mechanisms acting on the viral RNA during host adaptation are still largely unknown. Here, we found that two almost identical tandem RNA structures present at the viral 3′ untranslated region are under different selective pressures in the two hosts. Mechanistic studies indicated that the two RNA elements, known as dumbbells, contain sequences that overlap essential RNA cyclization elements involved in viral RNA synthesis. The data support a model in which the duplicated RNA structures differentially evolved to accommodate distinct functions for viral replication in the two hosts.

INTRODUCTION

The Flavivirus genus includes a large number of emerging and reemerging human pathogens that are transmitted by arthropods, including dengue (DENV), Zika (ZIKV), yellow fever (YFV), and West Nile (WNV) viruses. Dengue is the most prevalent arthropod-borne viral disease around the world. It is endemic in more than 100 countries, with about 390 million infections each year (1). In 2016, Latin America faced the worst DENV and ZIKV epidemics, and since 2017, YFV became, once more, a threat for South America, despite the existence of an effective live attenuated vaccine (2).

The DENV genome is a single-stranded RNA molecule of positive polarity that contains a great deal of information in RNA structures that function as signals to enhance, suppress, or promote viral replication (for review, see reference 3). Natural sequence variations in these RNA structures can be determinants for viral epidemiological fitness, pathogenesis, host adaptation, and transmission between mosquitoes and humans (4–10). Although a great deal has been learned in the last decades about how these RNA signals function during flavivirus infections, little is known about their molecular mechanisms of action.

The DENV 5' untranslated region (UTR) includes two essential elements for genome replication: (i) the promoter for RNA synthesis, known as stem-loop A (SLA), and (ii) cyclization sequences that mediate long-range RNA-RNA interactions (11). The general organization of the DENV 3′ UTR is similar to that in other flaviviruses, containing essential elements for viral replication, and accessory RNA structures that participate in both modulating viral processes and controlling host antiviral responses (for review, see reference 12). An intriguing feature of the 3′ UTR of flavivirus genomes is the evolutionary conservation of sequence repeats and duplicated RNA structures (13, 14). In the case of DENV, the 3′ UTR contains two almost identical stem-loop structures (SLI and SLII), two similar dumbbell elements (DB1 and DB2), an essential small hairpin (sHP), and the 3′ stem-loop (3′ SL) common to all flaviviruses (15–21). The two pairs of duplicated RNA elements (SLI-SLII and DB1-DB2) acquire stable secondary structures, including pseudoknot (PK) interactions that have the ability to stall genome degradation (22, 23). In DENV infections, SLI and SLII are responsible for the generation and accumulation of noncoding viral RNAs as products of incomplete genome degradation, known as subgenomic flavivirus RNAs (sfRNAs) (8, 24). These sfRNAs play important roles counteracting antiviral responses in mosquito and human cells (25–28; for review, see references 19, 29, and 30).

The biological significance of maintaining two almost identical RNA structures in the 3′ UTR of flaviviruses is enigmatic. Redundant functions, as replication enhancers, were proposed for the two DB elements (31, 32). However, predictions of distinct folding intermediates of DB1 and DB2 suggested possible distinct functions (32). Interestingly, an extensive pan-flavivirus sequence analysis proposed that repeated motifs and duplications were associated with the viral evolutionary process of acquiring multiple hosts (for review, see reference 33). More recently, experimental data obtained studying the function of the duplicated SLs in DENV supported a model in which RNA duplication allows the virus to accommodate mutations beneficial in one host (mosquitoes) but deleterious in the other (humans), conferring robustness during host switching (5).

Previous studies have determined other requirements for different viral RNA structures for DENV replication in the two hosts (5, 34–36). These observations raised important questions regarding the mechanisms by which viral RNA structures work in mosquitoes and humans and about the implications of the genetic variations in the 3′ UTR in host adaptation, transmission, and pathogenesis. In this regard, in regions of endemicity and hyperendemicity, cocirculation of different DENV genotypes or serotypes can lead to strain displacements, often associated with different transmission kinetics and clinical outcomes (37–40), highlighting the relevance of understanding the reasons for genome sequence variability in natural settings. Interestingly, sequence variability at the 3' UTR of DENV isolates was recently correlated with distinct epidemiological fitness (4).

Here, using DENV as a model, we found that each of the duplicated DB RNA structures in the viral 3' UTR is under different selective pressures in adult mosquitoes. Sequence analysis of DENV RNA populations showed adaptive mutations mapping in only one of the two DB structures. Using recombinant viruses with the identified mutations, a great advantage for viral replication in mosquito cells was associated with alterations in the DB2 sequence. Mechanistic analysis indicated that the two DB elements differentially regulate genome cyclization, which is a conformation required for viral RNA synthesis. We previously showed that sequences within DB1 hybridize with a region present in the capsid coding sequence, promoting genome cyclization (34). Now, we present experimental evidence showing a competition between a sequence at the top loop of DB2 and a core cyclization element for tertiary interactions. Our data support a model in which superimposed sequences involved in local RNA structures and long-range RNA-RNA interactions regulate different viral RNA conformations that are relevant for infection. Although we experimentally worked with DENV, these overlapping RNA signals were found in the genomes of all mosquito-borne flaviviruses (MBFV), suggesting a widely conserved mechanism. We conclude that the duplicated DB structures present in the DENV 3' UTR have redundant activities in both hosts but evolved divergent sequences with host specific functions. These results provide new ideas that shed light on flavivirus evolution and host adaptation.

RESULTS

DENV adaptive mutations associated with mosquito infection.To study the significance of DENV 3'-UTR variability in host adaptation, we sequenced viral RNA populations obtained from infected Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. Extracts from pools of five A. albopictus mosquitoes 14 days postinfection (dpi) were used for titrations and to infect fresh mosquitoes (passage 1 [P1]) (Fig. 1A). Viruses obtained from the second passage were harvested at 14 dpi (P2). Genomes from the original stock (input) and viral genomes obtained in P1 and P2 from two independent experiments were used for 3'-UTR amplicon sequencing by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and cloning. We searched for mutations that were absent in the input population but showed increased frequencies from P1 to P2. Four mutations with increased frequencies were detected above the threshold of 0.5% of the population (Fig. 1A). These mutations (delG284, delG287, A289G, and InsC345) mapped in the DB2 structure (Fig. 1B). Although mutations were also detected in DB1, no positive selection on any of them was observed from P1 to P2 (Fig. 1A). Because there is a special interest in understanding the function of RNA structure duplication in flavivirus genomes, and a deletion specifically introduced into DB2 results in attenuation of promising DENV vaccine candidates (41, 42), we further investigated the biological significance of these nucleotide variations.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

DENV adaptive mutations associated with replication in mosquitoes. (A) (Left) Experimental design of DENV adaptation in adult mosquitoes. (Right) Mutations identified in the input and passages P1 and P2. Red stars indicate mutations that showed increased frequencies from P1 to P2. (B) Location of adaptive mutations in the viral 3′ UTR. The secondary structures of the two DBs are shown. Nucleotide variations are indicated in red. (C) Replication of recombinant reporter DENVs carrying the identified mutations. The plot shows viral replication measured by luciferase activity as a function of time post-RNA transfection into mosquito cells. The luciferase values (in arbitrary units [a.u.]) are means ± standard deviations (representative results of three independent experiments). *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001.

To evaluate the relevance of the variants selected in mosquitoes, recombinant viruses carrying the identified point mutations were designed in the context of a reporter DENV infectious cDNA clone, and replication was tested in a mosquito cell line. Mutant viral RNAs were transfected along with a wild-type (WT) RNA and a replication-defective control with a mutation in the polymerase NS5. Viral replication was assessed by measuring luciferase activity as a function of time (Fig. 1C). The virus with the insertion InsC345, which debilitates formation of the PK that stabilizes DB2 (Fig. 1B), showed a 4-fold increase in luciferase expression with respect to WT virus. The mutants with the other three mutations, delG284, delG287, and A289G, which alter DB loop and DB stability, had between 2- and 3-fold increased viral replication with respect to WT.

We conclude that mutations positively selected in adult mosquitoes that affect DB2 structure result in enhanced RNA replication in mosquito cells. Therefore, we used this model to understand mechanistic aspects and functions of the adaptive mutations.

Distinct evolution of the two DB elements present at the 3′ UTR of DENV isolates.Based on the selection of advantageous mutations in mosquitoes in one of the two DBs, we examined the evolutionary relationship between the duplicated RNA structures in different DENV serotypes. To this end, we employed a tree alignment model algorithm, RNAforester (43), to compute pairwise alignments between DB secondary structures folded according to previous biochemical and covariation analyses. Results from individual comparisons were used to generate a similarity matrix that was plotted in dendrograms using UPGMA (the unweighted pair group method using average linkages) (Fig. 2A). This method allows determination of the relative similarity between two models of secondary structures by estimating the number of changes necessary to convert one structure to another. Thus, it was possible to determine how similar two structures are, independent of their sequence identity. The results indicate that the DB1 elements from different DENV serotypes are more alike between them than DB1 and DB2 from the same serotype (Fig. 2A). The same observation was valid for DB2, supporting a divergent evolutionary path and specialization of each structure after duplication.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Sequence and structure analysis of the two DB elements. (A) Fan dendrogram indicating the distance of DB structures from different DENV serotypes. The corresponding circle plot for each sequence is shown with arcs denoting base pairs. (B) Comparison of the natural sequence variability of DB1 and DB2 for different DENV2 genotypes. Asian I genotype was used as a reference. Variability of the DB sequences is indicated in red. The size bar indicates number of nucleotide substitution per site.

The sequence conservation of the two DBs was also analyzed using different genotypes of all four DENV serotypes. A conservation analysis per site for each structure showed 75% and 63% identity for DB1 and DB2, respectively. For example, in the case of DENV2, a higher sequence variability of DB2 was observed when genotypes from different geographic regions were compared (Fig. 2B). In this analysis, an Asian I genotype was used as a reference and compared to Cosmopolitan, American, Asian-American, Asian II, Sylvatic African, and Sylvatic Asian genotypes (Fig. 2B). The observation that DB2 displays more sequence variation than DB1 within the same serotype suggests that the two paralogous RNA elements are under different selective pressures in nature, which could be associated with the selection observed in mosquitoes (Fig. 1A).

Contrasting functions of the two DB RNA structures during DENV replication.The finding that DB2 displays more natural sequence variation than DB1 in different DENV isolates and that adaptive mutations in mosquitoes mapped to DB2 suggested a possible diversification of functions of the duplicated RNA structures. To examine this possibility, we designed deletions of each or both DB structures in mutated genomes and evaluated viral replication in mosquito cells. Viral RNA from the mutants (DENVΔDB1, DENVΔDB2, and DENVΔDB1-2 [Fig. 3A]) or controls was transfected into mosquito cells, and replication was assessed as a function of time. DENVΔDB1 showed about 10-fold reduction in luciferase expression by 72 hpi (Fig. 3B), in agreement with previous observations (34). However, deletion of DB2 resulted in about 8-fold increased viral replication with respect to WT virus. These results were unexpected because until now the DB elements were considered enhancers of viral replication. In addition, deletion of both DB structures (ΔDB1-2) resulted in a near-lethal phenotype, with a reduction of viral replication of more than 100-fold (Fig. 3B), indicating that although deletion of DB2 enhanced replication, the lack of both DB structures showed a synergistic negative effect on viral fitness. These results indicate that the duplicated RNA elements bear opposite functions during viral infection in the mosquito, but certain structural elements are redundant, and at least one copy is necessary (essential) for viral replication. The phenotypes were confirmed by deleting each of the DB elements in a DENV2 infectious clone and evaluating viral RNA accumulation (Fig. 3C) and production of infectious particles (Fig. 3D). The results indicate that deletions of DB1 or DB2 display opposite effects on DENV RNA accumulation in mosquito cells and deletion of both RNA structures greatly reduced viral RNA synthesis (Fig. 3C and D).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Divergent functions of the two DB structures. (A) Schematic representation of the DENV genome showing the RNA structures in the 5′ and 3′ UTRs. (B and E) Replication of DENV reporter mutants carrying deletions of individual DBs (ΔDB1 and ΔDB1) or both (ΔDB1-2) in mosquito and human cells, respectively. Plots show Renilla luciferase activity as a function of time post-RNA transfection. (C and D) Replication of WT DENV or mutants with DB deletions, using the original infectious DENV2 16681 clone. Luciferase values are means ± standard deviations (representative results from three independent experiments). (C) RNA accumulation. The plot indicates number of viral genome copies as a function of time in mosquito cells. (D) Production of infectious particles is expressed as PFU/ml. (F) Impact of the deletion of each DB on viral replication in mosquito and human cells. (G) Accumulation of sfRNAs in mosquito cells. Shown is a Northern blot using a radiolabeled probe that recognizes the viral RNA 3′ UTR. Different sfRNA species are indicated on the left (sfRNA1-4 and sfRNA1′). (H) Schematic representation of the del30 deleted sequence in DB2 and infectious particles produced in mosquito cells (top) and replication of the DENV del30 reporter mutant in mosquito and human cells along with the WT. Luciferase values are means ± standard deviations (representative results from three independent experiments). (I) Accumulation of gRNA (genomic RNA) and sfRNAs in mosquito cells. Shown is a Northern blot using a radiolabeled probe that recognizes the viral RNA 3′ UTR for sfRNA and NS2B for gRNA. Different sfRNA species separated by PAGE are indicated on the left. Asterisks indicate different sizes of sfRNA1 because of the DB deletions. The plot on the right shows the ratio of sfRNA to gRNA for each mutant.

To evaluate whether the phenotype observed with DENVs carrying DB deletions was host specific, the mutant viral RNAs and controls were transfected into A549 human cells. The deletion mutants DENVΔDB1 and DENVΔDB2 showed a subtle but significant reduction or increase of viral replication, respectively (Fig. 3E). Although deletion of each DB impacted replication in the same manner as that observed in mosquito cells, the magnitudes were markedly different. The deletion of both DBs (ΔDB1-2) reduced viral replication in human cells about 400-fold, supporting the idea of the requirement for at least one copy for viral replication. Together, the results indicate a diversification of functions of the two homologous RNA structures that is host specific in magnitude (Fig. 3F). In addition, at least one copy of a crucial cis-acting signal that is duplicated appears to be required in both hosts.

The duplicated SL and DB structures in the 3' UTR of flaviviruses are capable of stalling genome degradation by the 5′-exonuclease XRN1 that results in sfRNA accumulation (22). To evaluate whether deletion of DB2 could result in alteration of sfRNA accumulation, we analyzed their production in transfected cells by Northern blotting. In this regard, as previously reported, the replication of viruses with SL2 deletions resulted in the generation of shorter species of sfRNAs (Fig. 3G), which was associated with increased fitness in mosquitoes but a reduction of fitness in human cells (5). DENVΔDB2 generated a large amount of the expected sfRNA1′, which differed in size from the WT sfRNA1 by 70 nucleotides (nt), due to the deletion (Fig. 3G). DENVΔDB1 produced a similar sfRNA1', but in very small amounts associated with lower levels of viral genome accumulation (Fig. 3G). The results suggest that viruses that lack either of the DB elements retain the ability to halt genome degradation at SLI.

A deletion within DB2 is an attenuating mutation of a live vaccine candidate, DENV delta30 (del30), which is currently in advanced clinical trials (42). Because our observations support the idea that deletion or specific mutations in this structure enhance DENV2 replication in mosquitoes, we examined the replication of DENV2 del30 in mosquito and human cells. Full-length RNAs of the WT and del30 mutant were transfected, and viral replication was evaluated. Interestingly, the del30 mutated genome showed about 2-fold reduction of replication with respect to WT virus in both cell types, measured by reporter virus replication and infectious particles produced in mosquito cells (Fig. 3H). Because del30 replication in human cells was shown to produce a defective ratio of sfRNAs to viral genome (44), the ratio of these viral RNAs were analyzed in infected mosquito cells using the del30 mutant and viruses with the complete deletion of each of the DB elements. Due to the different replication kinetics of the DB mutants, cells were infected with different multiplicities of infection (MOI) and harvested at different times after infection to obtain sufficient amounts of viral RNA, and the ratio of sfRNA to genomic RNA (gRNA) was estimated for each virus using specific radiolabeled probes (Fig. 3I). This analysis indicated that del30 displays a significant reduction of sfRNA production in the infected mosquito cell. In addition, a reduction of this ratio and the detection of an uncharacterized small RNA (sfRNAx) were observed with the ΔDB1 mutant (Fig. 3I).

The results support the idea that, although certain mutations or complete deletion of DB2 result in increased viral replication in mosquito cells, del30 in the context of DENV2 RNA is slightly attenuated in these cells, as had been observed earlier for vaccine candidates in Aedes sp. mosquitoes (45, 46).

Mutually exclusive structures due to overlapping sequences in DB2-PK and 3′ CS modulate viral RNA replication.To investigate the mechanism by which DB2 modulates viral replication, we analyzed the elements known to govern DENV RNA synthesis. The sequence at the top loop of DB2 forms a PK that stabilizes the RNA structure, but this PK includes nucleotides within the essential 3′ conserved sequence (3′ CS) (Fig. 4). This CS is complementary to the 5′ CS, and the long-range RNA-RNA interaction 5′-3′ CS is an essential cyclization element for DENV RNA replication (31, 47). The two secondary structures, local DB2-PK and long-range 5′-3′ CS, are mutually exclusive: one is present in the linear form of the viral genome and the other in the circular form, respectively (Fig. 4). Thus, we hypothesize that the DB2-PK structure modulates genome cyclization.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Mutually exclusive local and long-range RNA interactions. Shown is a schematic representation of linear and circular conformations of the DENV genome. Cyclization elements are indicated: 5′ and 3′ UAR (blue), 5′ and 3′ CS (purple), 5′ and 3′ DAR (gray), and C1-DB1 (red) in both structures (top linear and bottom circular). DB2 is indicated in green. In boxes, the sequences of pseudoknot (PK-IV) that overlap the 3′ CS are shown for both forms—linear (PK-IV) and circular (5′-3′ CS).

We have previously shown a tight regulation of the equilibrium between circular and linear forms of the genome for viral infectivity and analyzed hundreds of DENV mutants that disrupted/restored genome cyclization in mammalian cells (48). To examine the possible involvement of DB elements in modulating cyclization in mosquito cells, we tested mutant DENVs in which the equilibrium between linear and circular forms of the genome was drastically displaced, expecting a stronger selective pressure than in human cells. The mutants used, Mut Cyc+ or Mut Cyc−, increase or decrease complementarity between the ends of the viral genome, respectively (Fig. 5A). Viral RNAs were transfected into mosquito cells, and propagation was evaluated by immunofluorescence as a function of time. Both Mut Cyc+ and Mut Cyc− RNAs were replication impaired; however, 16 days after transfection, replicating viruses were rescued from cell cultures (Fig. 5A). For sequencing the genomes of recovered viruses, RNA was isolated, the viral genomes were circularized by end-to-end ligation after decapping, and both the 5′ and 3′ ends of the same genome were sequenced in single amplicons. The main revertant virus from cells transfected with Mut Cyc+ had a mutation that (i) reduced by 1 bp the upstream AUG region (UAR) complementarity (reducing cyclization) and (ii) increased stability of the 3′ SL by 1 bp (increasing stability of the linear form) (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, revertant virus from Mut Cyc−-transfected cells had two point mutations that (i) reformed a base pair in UAR, increasing cyclization, and (ii) introduced one mutation in the top loop of DB2, disrupting the PK interaction that competes with cyclization (Fig. 5B). This pseudorevertant virus with a mutation disrupting DB2-PK that compensates for reduced cyclization was particularly informative. This observation links a local RNA structure with long-range interactions.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

DB2 sequence negatively regulates genome cyclization. (A) Immunofluorescence of mosquito cells transfected with RNA from WT and recombinant viruses carrying the mutations Mut Cyc+ and Mut Cyc− in the 5′-3′ UAR sequence, as indicated. (B) Schematic representation of mutations identified in the recovered viruses. In the case of Mut Cyc+, the location of the mutations in linear and circular forms of the RNA is shown. In the case of Mut Cyc−, the location of mutations in the circular form is shown, indicating both the complementary region and disruption of DB2 PK. (C) (Left) Design of mutation to disrupt the DB2 PK (MutPK). (Right) Replication of DENV reporter mutants in mosquito cells. Luciferase activity measurements as a function of time are shown for each case. The luciferase values are means ± standard deviations (representative results from three independent experiments). **, P < 0.01.

In order to confirm our hypothesis that formation of the PK of DB2 competes with genome cyclization and negatively regulates viral RNA replication, a recombinant virus was designed impairing formation of the PK (Mut-PK [Fig. 5C]). This mutant RNA was transfected along with controls into mosquito cells, and replication was evaluated as a function of time. Disruption of the PK resulted in about 10-fold increased viral replication, showing a similar phenotype to that observed with the DENVΔDB2 mutant (Fig. 5C). These results support a role of the DB2-PK on genome cyclization, providing a possible explanation for the selection of mutations in mosquitoes that destabilize this structure.

Mapping 3′-UTR mutations identified in a previous intrahost study with DENV1-infected mosquitoes.An intrahost diversity study in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with DENV1 has recently been reported. This work investigated viral population expansions after the initial infection, shown to be randomly founded by a few tens of viruses (49). Deep sequencing of viral genomes obtained from midgut and salivary glands of individual mosquitoes at different time points postinfection identified a number of single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Here, we analyzed the original data focusing on viral 3′-UTR SNVs that reached frequencies above 10% in the mosquito organs. Eleven such SNVs were found and mapped to the predicted RNA structures (Fig. 6). In SLI, one mutation was detected in a variable element, while in SLII, the identified mutation disrupted the RNA structure. This observation is in agreement with previous host adaptation studies that showed increased fitness in mosquitoes of DENV with mutations disrupting specifically SLII (5). Within DBI and DBII elements, 2 and 6 mutations were identified, respectively. One mutation in DBI mapped to a bulge, and the other mapped to the top loop, maintaining or even enhancing PK interaction (a UG base pair was replaced by a CG) (Fig. 6B). In DBII structure, from the six mutations identified, three did not change the predicted RNA structure, one partially opened the stem, and the other two directly disrupted PK formation. These two substitutions occurred at each side of the PK, in the top loop and in the sequence downstream of DBII (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, this last mutation, located in the only nucleotide of the PK that is outside the 3′-CS sequence (position 10630 [Fig. 6B]), was almost fixed in the entire viral population in a midgut sample (99.2%), consistent with a replication advantage of a viral genome that released the competition between PK and long-range RNA-RNA interaction.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Mapping single nucleotide variations in the viral 3′ UTR from intrahost analysis in DENV1-infected mosquitoes (A) Distribution along the viral 3′ UTR of mutations identified in an intrahost analysis using A. aegypti mosquitoes. The plot represents the frequency of mutations identified indicated in the y axis and the position in a reference DENV1 genome (GenBank accession no. HG316481) shown in the x axis. Colors indicate each of the defined RNA structures along the 3′ UTR, as indicated on the right. Sequence variations detected in viruses included in the blood meal are also shown in the plot by open circles and on the right, indicating the position, nucleotide change, and frequency for each case. For SNVs detected in several samples, only the highest frequency is indicated. (B) Location of the mutations identified with frequencies above 10% on the secondary structure of the DENV1 3′ UTR. As a reference DENV1, GenBank accession no. HG316481 was used. Arrows indicate the position of the substitutions, including the frequency, the nucleotide change, and the source—midgut (MG) or salivary gland (SG). The green circle indicates a mutation found at a frequency of 99% that disrupts DB2-PK formation.

Although the adaptive nature of these mutations has not been directly tested, this study supports the concept that mutations in DBII disrupting PK interaction may provide a viral fitness advantage in the mosquito. It also shows that this type of variations can spontaneously arise in vivo and increase in frequency in the viral population in mosquitoes.

Conserved overlapping RNA signals in MBFV genomes.Taking into account that cyclization of the viral genome is a common feature of all flaviviruses, we also analyzed the relative distribution of the DB structures and cyclization signals in different flavivirus 3′ UTRs. MBFVs include a large number of human pathogens that are divided into seven groups: the DENV group (DENVG), Japanese encephalitis group (JEVG), YFV group (YFVG), Kokobera virus group (KOKVG), Aroa virus group (AROVG), Ntaya virus group (NTAVG), and Spondweni virus group (SPOVG) (50). The 3′ UTR of all these viruses bears a conserved DB structure, and in most, the structure is duplicated (Fig. 7). Exceptions are members of the YFVG and members of the SPOVG (including Zika virus). In these two cases, the single DB is preceded by a pseudo-DB (ΨDB, lacking conserved DB structural blocks), but forming a PK with sequences downstream of the DB structure (Fig. 7). An interesting feature in MBFV 3′ UTRs is the distinct distribution of the PKs that stabilize the two DB elements. In most cases, formation of both PKs results from pairing of sequences present in the top loops of the DBs with unstructured sequences located downstream of DB2. In contrast, in the four DENV serotypes, DB1 PK is formed with sequences located upstream of DB2 (Fig. 7). Interestingly, analysis of cyclization signals in each case indicates that, regardless of the location of the PKs, in all MBFVs analyzed, sequences involved in genome cyclization (3′ CS) overlap PK sequences that stabilize DB2 (Fig. 7). This conserved property shared among all MBFVs supports a regulatory role of overlapping sequences with contrasting functions in the viral 3′ UTRs. Special attributes were observed in RNA structures present in the YFV genome. In this case, both PK sequences (stabilizing ΨDB and DB structures) overlap cyclization elements, suggesting an additional function of the ΨDB element in regulating genome conformation of this particular virus.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

Conserved distribution of DB PK and cyclization elements in the genomes of mosquito-borne flaviviruses (MBFVs). Dumbbell structures of selected viruses from each subgroup of MBFV are shown. Locations and complementary bases that form PKs are indicated in blue. YFV and ZIKV form ΨDBs with PKs that are indicated in gray. Complementary sequences between the 5′ and 3′ ends of the genome that involve DB PKs are shown (5′-3′ interactions). Estimated P values show the reliability of indicated long-range RNA-RNA interactions, which were compared with a randomly sampled alignment. The distance tree was drawn using the neighbor-joining method of all complete genome sequences for each virus available in GenBank.

DISCUSSION

In these studies, we found that paralogous viral RNA structures originating from duplications in the 3′ UTR of flavivirus genomes are under different selective pressures in different hosts. The data support the hypothesis that duplicated DB elements, present in most MBFV genomes, conserve redundant functions, but also have evolved divergent host-specific activities that modulate viral RNA replication. Our work provides mechanistic details by which DB structures regulate viral genome conformation by either enhancing or competing with long-range RNA-RNA interactions that promote viral RNA synthesis. We propose a model in which different requirements for viral replication in mosquito and human cells may explain the conservation of duplicated RNA structures in flavivirus 3' UTRs.

Formation of two DB structures with PK interactions in the DENV genome was originally predicted (15–17) and then supported by chemical and enzymatic probing (5, 24, 51). Interestingly, predictions of RNA folding intermediates suggested unequal frequencies of occurrence of the two DB structures (32). Previous functional studies supported the idea that both DB elements act as enhancers of DENV replication (31, 32). These previous reports from our laboratory and others used replicon systems lacking cis-acting elements at the 5′ end of the genome that could alter DB functions (34, 52, 53). For this reason, in the present work, we used reporter DENV genomes that included all identified RNA structures located in the coding sequence of the capsid protein (34). Using this system, we provide new information about differential roles of the two DB elements in infected cells. Sequence and RNA structure analyses of different DENV serotypes and genotypes suggested that the paralogous DB structures diverged after duplication, also supporting specialized functions (Fig. 2).

We found that DB2 contains structural elements that regulate viral replication. Adaptive mutations selected in mosquitoes were identified that reduced DB2-PK stability, and experiments in mosquito cells with recombinant and rescued viruses, from infections with cyclization-impaired or -enhanced mutants, supported the involvement of DB2 in regulating genome cyclization (Fig. 1, 5, and Fig. 6). Together, the data indicate a function of the local DB2-PK folding in reducing long-range RNA-RNA interactions and viral RNA replication. We previously showed that sequences within DB1 hybridize with a region present in the capsid coding sequence (Fig. 4) and that disassembling DB1 structure promoted long-range interactions and genome cyclization (34). These functions of the two DBs in regulating genome conformations could explain the observed opposite impact of deleting each structure on viral RNA accumulation (Fig. 3C).

It is still intriguing why the overall structure of DB2 is retained in nature. Covariations that maintained the structure suggest that DB2 structure may play additional functions. In this regard, it is important to mention the presence of a conserved sequence (CS2), which is present in both DBs (17, 54). Perhaps a correct architecture around CS2 is important for the redundant function observed in mosquito and human cell infections (Fig. 3B and E). We propose that the two DB structures are complex RNA elements that accommodate multiple signals that modulate viral processes.

The DENV genome functions as a dynamic molecule, and changes in the equilibrium between linear and circular forms of the viral RNA have been previously demonstrated to have a great impact on viral infectivity (47, 48, 55–57). A number of functional RNA structures that exist in the linear form of the genome were found to overlap with cyclization elements (e.g., sHP, 3' SL, SLB, and DB), providing a mechanism for controlling conformations of the viral RNA during replication. Regulation of genome conformations could also modulate the efficiency of viral translation. In fact, mutations of the top loop of both DBs have been previously reported to moderately reduce translation (32). Our results with mutations or deletions of DB2 support its role in regulation of a viral process that requires cyclization. In this regard, it is expected that translation would not be promoted by genome cyclization through RNA-RNA interactions including 5′-UTR sequences. However, more work will be necessary to understand the possible involvement of the DB elements and the requirement of specific genome conformations during early stages of infection, such as uncoating and translation. It is likely that cellular or viral proteins with RNA helicase or chaperone activities also modulate conformations of the viral genome. In this regard, a number of mammalian cellular proteins have been reported as candidates to modulate viral RNA structures (58–63). In particular, a cellular DEAD box RNA helicase known as DDX6 has been demonstrated to interact specifically with DB elements, but the significance of this interaction requires further studies (60).

Interestingly, the windows of tolerance for alterations of the equilibrium between circular and linear forms of the genome for DENV viability were found to be different in infected mosquito or human cells. Mutations that displace this equilibrium that were tolerated for replication in human cells were detrimental in mosquito cells (34, 35). DB mutations that greatly impact viral replication in mosquito but not in human cells may be associated with different requirements in the two hosts for fine-tuning genome conformations. We conclude that evolution of viral sequences involved in mutually exclusive structures, local and long-range RNA-RNA interactions, has led to a mechanism to control utilization of the viral genome for different processes. It is remarkable that in all MBFV genomes, the DB-PK structures overlap cyclization sequences (Fig. 7), suggesting a widely conserved mechanism.

It has been shown recently that DENV genetic variations in mosquitoes alter the transmission kinetics (40). Our data support the idea that DENV infection in mosquitoes is a possible source for 3′-UTR sequence variations (Fig. 1 and 6). In this regard, an entomological surveillance in Brazil also revealed deletions and insertions in the viral 3′ UTR (10), supporting the idea that sequence variability in this region could be associated with different function/requirement of RNA structures in the two hosts. It is important to mention that variations in flavivirus 3′ UTRs can also be originated by selective pressures impinged by the RNA interference (RNAi) response of invertebrate cells. Studies using WNV have previously shown diversification of the viral genome by the mosquito RNAi machinery (64).

The structure of DB2 has been a target for viral attenuation in different flaviviruses (65, 66). In the case of DENVs, the delta30 mutant is a promising vaccine candidate. Thus, defining the mechanisms by which DB2 participates in viral processes is also important for understanding attenuation. Here, we observed that while complete deletion of DB2 resulted in increased replication capacity of the virus in mosquito cells, the delta30 mutation did not (Fig. 3). One possible explanation for these phenotypes is that a partial deletion of DB2 results in RNA misfolding or leads to structural rearrangements that do not occur when the complete structure is deleted (67). This may also explain the reduced amounts of sfRNAs in infected mosquito cells with DENV delta30 (Fig. 3I), in agreement with recent observations in human cells (44), which could also be associated with viral attenuation. Nevertheless, it is important to highlight that in mosquito cells, DENV2 delta30 did not display enhanced viral replication.

MBFV contain two pairs of duplicated RNA structures in the 3′ UTR: two SLs and two DBs. We previously investigated the function of the two SLs in mosquitoes and mosquito and human cultured cells and found that RNA duplication supports efficient DENV host switching (5). In this regard, it was found that SLII was subjected to sequence variations during host adaptation, while SLI was unchanged. In the case of DENV, the two SLs were found to be functionally coupled for sfRNA generation, and sequence variations acquired in mosquito adaptation were detrimental for sfRNA1 formation (8), which is an sfRNA important in counteracting interferon (IFN) responses in human cells. Here, we identified sequence variations in one of the two DB structures in DENVs that were isolated after passage in mosquitoes. This observation was intriguing because of the striking resemblance to that observed in the duplicated SLs. Because deletion of both DB elements was near lethal for viral replication in mosquito and human cells, and deletion of DB2 was greatly advantageous for mosquito infection, we propose that maintenance of double copies of RNA structures is a viral strategy to ensure functionality of one conserved element, while the other is under different selective pressures in the two hosts.

Most MBFVs contain duplications of DB elements in their 3′ UTRs. However, RNA structures containing conserved DB elements are also found in flaviviruses with no known vectors (NKVFs), such as Yokose virus (YOKV), Entebbe bat virus (ENTV) and Modoc virus (MODV), and in insect-specific flaviviruses (ISFs) related to MBFVs, such as Chaoyang virus (CHAOV) and Nhumirim virus (NHUV) (for review see reference 19). These viruses infect either vertebrate or invertebrate cells, lacking the ability to alternate between hosts. Interestingly, single copies of DB structures are found in their 3′ UTRs. This evolutionary trend supports the idea that duplicated DBs are required for flaviviruses with dual hosts.

The mechanisms by which the two pairs of duplicated RNA elements (SLs and DBs) participate in the viral transmission cycle appear to be different; however, both are under host-specific selective pressures. Sequence and RNA structure duplications at the viral 3′ UTR were also reported to be relevant for host adaptation in other arboviruses. In this regard, an interesting report using chikungunya virus (CHIKV) described the process of viral 3′-UTR evolution in different hosts (68). In this case, duplication of direct repeats (DRs) in the CHIKV 3′ UTR was found to be beneficial for viral replication in mosquito cells rather than in human cells. The accumulating data using different arthropod-borne virus systems suggest convergent evolutionary mechanisms associating RNA structure duplications with host adaptation.

In summary, our findings provide new insights about functions and host-specific requirements of duplicated RNA structures in flavivirus genomes. We believe that understanding mechanisms that enable these viruses to replicate in multiple hosts will help to elucidate factors that govern the geographic expansion of these important viral pathogens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell lines.C6/36HT cells (Aedes albopictus cell line, adapted to grow at 33°C) were cultured in Leibovitz's L-15 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 0.3% tryptose phosphate broth, 0.02% glutamine, 1% minimal essential medium (MEM) nonessential amino acids solution, and 0.25 µg/ml amphotericin B (Fungizone). A549 cells (human epithelial lung cell line) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle’s medium with nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin.

Mosquito adaptation experiments.Viral stocks were prepared in BHK cells. Supernatants were harvested at different times posttransfection, and viruses were quantified by plaque assays. Aedes albopictus, Lake Charles, strain laboratory mosquitoes originating from Louisiana were reared from eggs and maintained as adults at 28°C and 80% relative humidity and given water and sugar until infection. Adult female mosquitoes 5 days postemergence were intrathoracically (i.t.) inoculated with approximately 70 nl of cell culture medium with a total titer of 200 PFU, using a Nanojet II (Drummond Scientific Company). Mosquitoes were maintained for 14 days, and a pool of five mosquitoes was used for RNA extraction and sequencing (P1). In addition, two batches of 10 mosquitoes each were homogenized in 1 ml of grinding medium and virus titer was determined. New females were injected with 70 nl of P1 extracts. After 14 days, RNA from groups of five mosquitoes was extracted and used for sequencing (P2).

Sequencing analysis.Viral RNAs were TRIzol extracted (Invitrogen) from homogenized mosquitoes and used for reverse transcription-PCRs (RT-PCRs) in duplicates with tagged primers specifically designed to amplify the last 600 nucleotides of both genome ends, using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and Platinum Pfx DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). As a reference, the in vitro-transcribed viral RNA, the DNA plasmid template, and the viral RNA input from BHK supernatants were also sequenced. Libraries were sequenced using a 454 Genome Sequencer FLX Titanium XLR70 system (Roche), and raw data were analyzed as describe below. Reads covering 400 nucleotides of the 3′ and 5' UTRs were aligned to the reference sequence. Positions of alignments from low-complexity regions with repetitions major to four nucleotides were discarded from the analysis. To define selected viral variants, a sequence-to-vector approach was applied (69). For each alignment, a comparative matrix was constructed, and a dimensional reduction of matrices was performed using single-value decomposition. The 10 more important dimensions were used to determine the clusters of sequences using “density-based clustering.” Finally, prototype sequence of each cluster corresponding to each variant was determined by the consensus sequence.

Cloning and sequencing revertant viruses.Viral RNA was TRIzol extracted from clarified supernatants. RNA was treated with tobacco acid pyrophosphatase (Epicenter) to remove caps, and 3′ and 5′ ends of the RNA were ligated with T4 RNA ligase (Epicenter) as previously described (70). After phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, the pellet was resuspended in 20 µl of RNase-free water. Five microliters was used for RT using random primers and PCR using primers designed to amplify the 5′-3′ junction region. The RT-PCR products were directly sequenced to determine the consensus sequence and cloned into pGEM-T Easy plasmid (Promega). At least 20 independent clones were sequenced for each PCR product.

Dumbbell structure analysis.For RNA structure similarity analysis, the RNAforester software was used (43). Models based on previous biochemical and bioinformatics information were used as input, and from this, similarity matrices were built using “pairwise alignment” function. The matrices were normalized and used to calculate the distances to plot the dendrograms using the UPGMA method (unweighted pair group method using average linkages). For the RNA structure analysis, DENV2 isolates representative of different genotypes were used.

Construction of recombinant DENVs.The construction of recombinant DENV cDNAs (DENV2 full-length clones, pDV) was performed as previously described (31). For the reporter constructs, FullCapDVLuc, a monocistronic DENV reporter construct containing the Renilla luciferase (Rluc) gene previously described (34), was modified by replacing the AflII-XbaI WT fragment with a fragment containing the mutations. All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing analysis using ABI Prism 3130 genetic analyzer and BigDye terminator 3.1 chemistry (Applied Biosystems).

RNA transcriptions and transfections.Infectious viral cDNA plasmids were linearized with XbaI (New England Biolabs) and used as the templates for in vitro transcription using T7 RNA polymerase (Ambion) in the presence of m7GpppA cap analog (New England Biolabs). RNA integrity was confirmed in 1% agarose RNase-free gels. RNA transcripts were transfected into C6/36HT and A549 cells grown in 24-well plates using Lipofectamine 2000 and Opti-MEM media (Invitrogen). The Rluc activity in transfected cells was analyzed using the Promega Renilla luciferase assay system according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s or Dunnett’s correction for multiple comparisons.

RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and real-time PCR.For quantification by real-time RT-PCR, total viral RNA was TRIzol extracted at various time points posttransfection. RNA samples were reverse transcribed in 20-µl reaction volumes, as previously described (71). For real-time PCR, reactions were performed in duplicates in 96-well plates using 2 µl of the RT reaction mixture as the template, 5 µl FastStart SYBR green Master 2× mix (Roche), 300 nM each primer, and RNase-free water to 10 µl. The primers AVG1117 (5'-ACAAGTCGAACAACCTGGTCCAT-3′) and AVG1118 (5'-GCCGCACCATTGGTCTTCTC-3′) were targeted to amplify nucleotides 9937 to 10113 within the NS5 coding sequence. Reactions were run with the following parameters: 95°C for 10 min and then 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s and 60°C for 40s.

Immunofluorescence assays.C6/36HT cells transfected with WT or mutated DENV RNAs were grown in 24-well plates containing 1-cm2 coverslips. At various times posttransfection, coverslips were removed, and cells were fixed with methanol for 15 min at 20°C. For detection of viral antigens, a specific anti-E monoclonal antibody (MAb), E18, was used. Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Molecular Probes) was employed to detect the primary antibody under the same conditions.

Titration.Viral titers were determined by PFU in BHK-21 cells.

Northern blotting.For DENV sfRNA detection, total RNA was obtained from transfected cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) at different times posttransfection or postinfection and separated on 5% polyacrylamide–7 M urea gel, as previously described (8). For detection, uniformly 32P-labeled RNA probe complementary to the complete 3′ UTR (nucleotides 10269 to 10723) was used.

Slot blots.For detection of genomic RNA (gRNA), a uniformly 32P-labeled RNA probe complementary to a region of NS2B sequence was used. Samples were loaded into a slot blot apparatus using nylon membrane (Hybond-N; GE Healthcare).

Predicted RNA structures in the genome of mosquito-borne flaviviruses.Genome sequences of representative viruses corresponding to different subgroups of mosquito-borne flaviviruses were used (yellow fever virus [YFV], Kokobera virus [KOKV], Zika virus [ZIKV], Japanese encephalitis virus [JEV], Saint Louis encephalitis virus [SLEV], West Nile virus [WNV], Iguape virus [IGUV], and dengue virus [DENV]). The RNAfold package software was used to detect thermodynamically stable and evolutionarily conserved RNA secondary structures. To characterize possible tertiary interactions, complementary base pairs, and covariations, Biostring functions and the RNAaliduplex software were used together with predicted secondary structure models. For each long-range interaction, we calculated the Z-score using a methodology previously proposed (72). Detailed information of GenBank ID references of complete genome sequences used throughout this work is shown in Table S1 in the supplemental material.

TABLE S1

Accession numbers. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.5 MB.
Copyright © 2019 de Borba et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank members of the Gamarnik laboratory for helpful discussions.

A.V.G., L.B., C.V.F., and L.G.G. are members of the Argentinean Council of Investigation (CONICET). F.L.M., J.M.C., and H.M.P. were granted CONICET fellowships. This work was supported by NIH (NIAID) R01.AI095175 and ANPCyT Argentina PICT-2014-2111, -2015-2555, and -2017-1717 to A.V.G.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 November 2018
    • Accepted 27 November 2018
    • Published 8 January 2019
  • Copyright © 2019 de Borba et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bhatt S,
    2. Gething PW,
    3. Brady OJ,
    4. Messina JP,
    5. Farlow AW,
    6. Moyes CL,
    7. Drake JM,
    8. Brownstein JS,
    9. Hoen AG,
    10. Sankoh O,
    11. Myers MF,
    12. George DB,
    13. Jaenisch T,
    14. Wint GR,
    15. Simmons CP,
    16. Scott TW,
    17. Farrar JJ,
    18. Hay SI
    . 2013. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496:504–507. doi:10.1038/nature12060.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mir D,
    2. Delatorre E,
    3. Bonaldo M,
    4. Lourenco-de-Oliveira R,
    5. Vicente AC,
    6. Bello G
    . 2017. Phylodynamics of yellow fever virus in the Americas: new insights into the origin of the 2017 Brazilian outbreak. Sci Rep 7:7385. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07873-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Iglesias N,
    2. Byk L,
    3. Gamarnik A
    . 2014. Molecular biology of dengue virus, p 334–364. In Gubler DJ, Ooi EE, Vasudevan S, Farrar J (ed), Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever, 2nd ed. CABI, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Manokaran G,
    2. Finol E,
    3. Wang C,
    4. Gunaratne J,
    5. Bahl J,
    6. Ong EZ,
    7. Tan HC,
    8. Sessions OM,
    9. Ward AM,
    10. Gubler DJ,
    11. Harris E,
    12. Garcia-Blanco MA,
    13. Ooi EE
    . 2015. Dengue subgenomic RNA binds TRIM25 to inhibit interferon expression for epidemiological fitness. Science 350:217–221. doi:10.1126/science.aab3369.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Villordo SM,
    2. Filomatori CV,
    3. Sanchez-Vargas I,
    4. Blair CD,
    5. Gamarnik AV
    . 2015. Dengue virus RNA structure specialization facilitates host adaptation. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004604. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Chavali PL,
    2. Stojic L,
    3. Meredith LW,
    4. Joseph N,
    5. Nahorski MS,
    6. Sanford TJ,
    7. Sweeney TR,
    8. Krishna BA,
    9. Hosmillo M,
    10. Firth AE,
    11. Bayliss R,
    12. Marcelis CL,
    13. Lindsay S,
    14. Goodfellow I,
    15. Woods CG,
    16. Gergely F
    . 2017. Neurodevelopmental protein Musashi-1 interacts with the Zika genome and promotes viral replication. Science 357:83–88. doi:10.1126/science.aam9243.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Pompon J,
    2. Manuel M,
    3. Ng GK,
    4. Wong B,
    5. Shan C,
    6. Manokaran G,
    7. Soto-Acosta R,
    8. Bradrick SS,
    9. Ooi EE,
    10. Misse D,
    11. Shi PY,
    12. Garcia-Blanco MA
    . 2017. Dengue subgenomic flaviviral RNA disrupts immunity in mosquito salivary glands to increase virus transmission. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006535. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006535.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Filomatori CV,
    2. Carballeda JM,
    3. Villordo SM,
    4. Aguirre S,
    5. Pallares HM,
    6. Maestre AM,
    7. Sanchez-Vargas I,
    8. Blair CD,
    9. Fabri C,
    10. Morales MA,
    11. Fernandez-Sesma A,
    12. Gamarnik AV
    . 2017. Dengue virus genomic variation associated with mosquito adaptation defines the pattern of viral non-coding RNAs and fitness in human cells. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006265. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006265.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Leitmeyer KC,
    2. Vaughn DW,
    3. Watts DM,
    4. Salas R,
    5. Villalobos I,
    6. de Chacon,
    7. Ramos C,
    8. Rico-Hesse R
    . 1999. Dengue virus structural differences that correlate with pathogenesis. J Virol 73:4738–4747.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. de Castro MG,
    2. de Nogueira FB,
    3. Nogueira RMR,
    4. Lourenço-de-Oliveira R,
    5. dos Santos FB
    . 2013. Genetic variation in the 3' untranslated region of dengue virus serotype 3 strains isolated from mosquitoes and humans in Brazil. Virol J 10:3. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-10-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Filomatori CV,
    2. Lodeiro MF,
    3. Alvarez DE,
    4. Samsa MM,
    5. Pietrasanta L,
    6. Gamarnik AV
    . 2006. A 5' RNA element promotes dengue virus RNA synthesis on a circular genome. Genes Dev 20:2238–2249. doi:10.1101/gad.1444206.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Brinton MA,
    2. Miller WA
    . 2015. Positive strand RNA virus replication: it depends on the ends. Virus Res 206:1–2. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2015.06.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Gritsun TS,
    2. Gould EA
    . 2006. Direct repeats in the 3' untranslated regions of mosquito-borne flaviviruses: possible implications for virus transmission. J Gen Virol 87:3297–3305. doi:10.1099/vir.0.82235-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gritsun DJ,
    2. Jones IM,
    3. Gould EA,
    4. Gritsun TS
    . 2014. Molecular archaeology of Flaviviridae untranslated regions: duplicated RNA structures in the replication enhancer of flaviviruses and pestiviruses emerged via convergent evolution. PLoS One 9:e92056. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092056.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Proutski V,
    2. Gould EA,
    3. Holmes EC
    . 1997. Secondary structure of the 3' untranslated region of flaviviruses: similarities and differences. Nucleic Acids Res 25:1194–1202.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Shurtleff AC,
    2. Beasley DW,
    3. Chen JJ,
    4. Ni H,
    5. Suderman MT,
    6. Wang H,
    7. Xu R,
    8. Wang E,
    9. Weaver SC,
    10. Watts DM,
    11. Russell KL,
    12. Barrett AD
    . 2001. Genetic variation in the 3' non-coding region of dengue viruses. Virology 281:75–87. doi:10.1006/viro.2000.0748.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Olsthoorn RC,
    2. Bol JF
    . 2001. Sequence comparison and secondary structure analysis of the 3' noncoding region of flavivirus genomes reveals multiple pseudoknots. RNA 7:1370–1377.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  18. 18.↵
    1. Yu L,
    2. Markoff L
    . 2005. The topology of bulges in the long stem of the flavivirus 3' stem-loop is a major determinant of RNA replication competence. J Virol 79:2309–2324. doi:10.1128/JVI.79.4.2309-2324.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Villordo SM,
    2. Carballeda JM,
    3. Filomatori CV,
    4. Gamarnik AV
    . 2016. RNA structure duplications and flavivirus host adaptation. Trends Microbiol 24:270–283. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.01.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Men R,
    2. Bray M,
    3. Clark D,
    4. Chanock RM,
    5. Lai CJ
    . 1996. Dengue type 4 virus mutants containing deletions in the 3' noncoding region of the RNA genome: analysis of growth restriction in cell culture and altered viremia pattern and immunogenicity in rhesus monkeys. J Virol 70:3930–3937.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Zeng L,
    2. Falgout B,
    3. Markoff L
    . 1998. Identification of specific nucleotide sequences within the conserved 3'-SL in the dengue type 2 virus genome required for replication. J Virol 72:7510–7522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Pijlman GP,
    2. Funk A,
    3. Kondratieva N,
    4. Leung J,
    5. Torres S,
    6. van der Aa L,
    7. Liu WJ,
    8. Palmenberg AC,
    9. Shi PY,
    10. Hall RA,
    11. Khromykh AA
    . 2008. A highly structured, nuclease-resistant, noncoding RNA produced by flaviviruses is required for pathogenicity. Cell Host Microbe 4:579–591. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2008.10.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Funk A,
    2. Truong K,
    3. Nagasaki T,
    4. Torres S,
    5. Floden N,
    6. Balmori Melian E,
    7. Edmonds J,
    8. Dong H,
    9. Shi PY,
    10. Khromykh AA
    . 2010. RNA structures required for production of subgenomic flavivirus RNA. J Virol 84:11407–11417. doi:10.1128/JVI.01159-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Chapman EG,
    2. Moon SL,
    3. Wilusz J,
    4. Kieft JS
    . 2014. RNA structures that resist degradation by Xrn1 produce a pathogenic dengue virus RNA. eLife 3:e01892. doi:10.7554/eLife.01892.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Schnettler E,
    2. Sterken MG,
    3. Leung JY,
    4. Metz SW,
    5. Geertsema C,
    6. Goldbach RW,
    7. Vlak JM,
    8. Kohl A,
    9. Khromykh AA,
    10. Pijlman GP
    . 2012. Noncoding flavivirus RNA displays RNA interference suppressor activity in insect and mammalian cells. J Virol 86:13486–13500. doi:10.1128/JVI.01104-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Schuessler A,
    2. Funk A,
    3. Lazear HM,
    4. Cooper DA,
    5. Torres S,
    6. Daffis S,
    7. Jha BK,
    8. Kumagai Y,
    9. Takeuchi O,
    10. Hertzog P,
    11. Silverman R,
    12. Akira S,
    13. Barton DJ,
    14. Diamond MS,
    15. Khromykh AA
    . 2012. West Nile virus noncoding subgenomic RNA contributes to viral evasion of the type I interferon-mediated antiviral response. J Virol 86:5708–5718. doi:10.1128/JVI.00207-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Moon SL,
    2. Dodd BJ,
    3. Brackney DE,
    4. Wilusz CJ,
    5. Ebel GD,
    6. Wilusz J
    . 2015. Flavivirus sfRNA suppresses antiviral RNA interference in cultured cells and mosquitoes and directly interacts with the RNAi machinery. Virology 485:322–329. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2015.08.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Goertz GP,
    2. Fros JJ,
    3. Miesen P,
    4. Vogels CB,
    5. van der Bent ML,
    6. Geertsema C,
    7. Koenraadt CJ,
    8. van Rij RP,
    9. van Oers MM,
    10. Pijlman GP
    . 2016. Noncoding subgenomic flavivirus RNA is processed by the mosquito RNA interference machinery and determines West Nile virus transmission by Culex pipiens mosquitoes. J Virol 90:10145–10159. doi:10.1128/JVI.00930-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Clarke BD,
    2. Roby JA,
    3. Slonchak A,
    4. Khromykh AA
    . 2015. Functional non-coding RNAs derived from the flavivirus 3' untranslated region. Virus Res 206:53–61. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2015.01.026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kieft JS,
    2. Rabe JL,
    3. Chapman EG
    . 2015. New hypotheses derived from the structure of a flaviviral Xrn1-resistant RNA: conservation, folding, and host adaptation. RNA Biol 12:1169–1177. doi:10.1080/15476286.2015.1094599.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Alvarez DE,
    2. De Lella Ezcurra AL,
    3. Fucito S,
    4. Gamarnik AV
    . 2005. Role of RNA structures present at the 3'UTR of dengue virus on translation, RNA synthesis, and viral replication. Virology 339:200–212. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2005.06.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Manzano M,
    2. Reichert ED,
    3. Polo S,
    4. Falgout B,
    5. Kasprzak W,
    6. Shapiro BA,
    7. Padmanabhan R
    . 2011. Identification of cis-acting elements in the 3'-untranslated region of the dengue virus type 2 RNA that modulate translation and replication. J Biol Chem 286:22521–22534. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.234302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Gritsun TS,
    2. Gould EA
    . 2007. Origin and evolution of 3'UTR of flaviviruses: long direct repeats as a basis for the formation of secondary structures and their significance for virus transmission. Adv Virus Res 69:203–248. doi:10.1016/S0065-3527(06)69005-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. de Borba L,
    2. Villordo SM,
    3. Iglesias NG,
    4. Filomatori CV,
    5. Gebhard LG,
    6. Gamarnik AV
    . 2015. Overlapping local and long-range RNA-RNA interactions modulate dengue virus genome cyclization and replication. J Virol 89:3430–3437. doi:10.1128/JVI.02677-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Villordo SM,
    2. Gamarnik AV
    . 2013. Differential RNA sequence requirement for dengue virus replication in mosquito and mammalian cells. J Virol 87:9365–9372. doi:10.1128/JVI.00567-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Markoff L,
    2. Pang X,
    3. Houng Hs HS,
    4. Falgout B,
    5. Olsen R,
    6. Jones E,
    7. Polo S
    . 2002. Derivation and characterization of a dengue type 1 host range-restricted mutant virus that is attenuated and highly immunogenic in monkeys. J Virol 76:3318–3328.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Andrade CC,
    2. Young KI,
    3. Johnson WL,
    4. Villa ME,
    5. Buraczyk CA,
    6. Messer WB,
    7. Hanley KA
    . 2016. Rise and fall of vector infectivity during sequential strain displacements by mosquito-borne dengue virus. J Evol Biol 29:2205–2218. doi:10.1111/jeb.12939.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Vu TT,
    2. Holmes EC,
    3. Duong V,
    4. Nguyen TQ,
    5. Tran TH,
    6. Quail M,
    7. Churcher C,
    8. Parkhill J,
    9. Cardosa J,
    10. Farrar J,
    11. Wills B,
    12. Lennon NJ,
    13. Birren BW,
    14. Buchy P,
    15. Henn MR,
    16. Simmons CP
    . 2010. Emergence of the Asian 1 genotype of dengue virus serotype 2 in Viet Nam: in vivo fitness advantage and lineage replacement in South-East Asia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e757. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000757.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Lambrechts L,
    2. Fansiri T,
    3. Pongsiri A,
    4. Thaisomboonsuk B,
    5. Klungthong C,
    6. Richardson JH,
    7. Ponlawat A,
    8. Jarman RG,
    9. Scott TW
    . 2012. Dengue-1 virus clade replacement in Thailand associated with enhanced mosquito transmission. J Virol 86:1853–1861. doi:10.1128/JVI.06458-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Fontaine A,
    2. Lequime S,
    3. Moltini-Conclois I,
    4. Jiolle D,
    5. Leparc-Goffart I,
    6. Reiner RC, Jr.,
    7. Lambrechts L
    . 2018. Epidemiological significance of dengue virus genetic variation in mosquito infection dynamics. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007187. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007187.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Whitehead SS,
    2. Falgout B,
    3. Hanley KA,
    4. Blaney JE, Jr.,
    5. Markoff L,
    6. Murphy BR
    . 2003. A live, attenuated dengue virus type 1 vaccine candidate with a 30-nucleotide deletion in the 3' untranslated region is highly attenuated and immunogenic in monkeys. J Virol 77:1653–1657. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.2.1653-1657.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Whitehead SS,
    2. Durbin AP,
    3. Pierce KK,
    4. Elwood D,
    5. McElvany BD,
    6. Fraser EA,
    7. Carmolli MP,
    8. Tibery CM,
    9. Hynes NA,
    10. Jo M,
    11. Lovchik JM,
    12. Larsson CJ,
    13. Doty EA,
    14. Dickson DM,
    15. Luke CJ,
    16. Subbarao K,
    17. Diehl SA,
    18. Kirkpatrick BD
    . 2017. In a randomized trial, the live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine TV003 is well-tolerated and highly immunogenic in subjects with flavivirus exposure prior to vaccination. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11:e0005584. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005584.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Hochsmann M,
    2. Voss B,
    3. Giegerich R
    . 2004. Pure multiple RNA secondary structure alignments: a progressive profile approach. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 1:53–62. doi:10.1109/TCBB.2004.11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Bustos-Arriaga J,
    2. Gromowski GD,
    3. Tsetsarkin KA,
    4. Firestone C-Y,
    5. Castro-Jiménez T,
    6. Pletnev AG,
    7. Cedillo-Barrón L,
    8. Whitehead SS
    . 2018. Decreased accumulation of subgenomic RNA in human cells infected with vaccine candidate DEN4Delta30 increases viral susceptibility to type I interferon. Vaccine 36:3460–3467. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.087.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    1. Troyer JM,
    2. Hanley KA,
    3. Whitehead SS,
    4. Strickman D,
    5. Karron RA,
    6. Durbin AP,
    7. Murphy BR
    . 2001. A live attenuated recombinant dengue-4 virus vaccine candidate with restricted capacity for dissemination in mosquitoes and lack of transmission from vaccinees to mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 65:414–419.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  46. 46.↵
    1. Whitehead SS,
    2. Hanley KA,
    3. Blaney JE, Jr.,
    4. Gilmore LE,
    5. Elkins WR,
    6. Murphy BR
    . 2003. Substitution of the structural genes of dengue virus type 4 with those of type 2 results in chimeric vaccine candidates which are attenuated for mosquitoes, mice, and rhesus monkeys. Vaccine 21:4307–4316. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00488-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Alvarez DE,
    2. Lodeiro MF,
    3. Luduena SJ,
    4. Pietrasanta LI,
    5. Gamarnik AV
    . 2005. Long-range RNA-RNA interactions circularize the dengue virus genome. J Virol 79:6631–6643. doi:10.1128/JVI.79.11.6631-6643.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Villordo SM,
    2. Alvarez DE,
    3. Gamarnik AV
    . 2010. A balance between circular and linear forms of the dengue virus genome is crucial for viral replication. RNA 16:2325–2335. doi:10.1261/rna.2120410.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Lequime S,
    2. Fontaine A,
    3. Ar Gouilh M,
    4. Moltini-Conclois I,
    5. Lambrechts L
    . 2016. Genetic drift, purifying selection and vector genotype shape dengue virus intra-host genetic diversity in mosquitoes. PLoS Genet 12:e1006111. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006111.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Fauquet CM
    . 2005. Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses, 8th ed. Elsevier, San Diego, CA. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780122499517.
  51. 51.↵
    1. Sztuba-Solinska J,
    2. Teramoto T,
    3. Rausch JW,
    4. Shapiro BA,
    5. Padmanabhan R,
    6. Le Grice SF
    . 2013. Structural complexity of Dengue virus untranslated regions: cis-acting RNA motifs and pseudoknot interactions modulating functionality of the viral genome. Nucleic Acids Res 41:5075–5089. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Groat-Carmona AM,
    2. Orozco S,
    3. Friebe P,
    4. Payne A,
    5. Kramer L,
    6. Harris E
    . 2012. A novel coding-region RNA element modulates infectious dengue virus particle production in both mammalian and mosquito cells and regulates viral replication in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Virology 432:511–526. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2012.06.028.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Liu ZY,
    2. Li XF,
    3. Jiang T,
    4. Deng YQ,
    5. Zhao H,
    6. Wang HJ,
    7. Ye Q,
    8. Zhu SY,
    9. Qiu Y,
    10. Zhou X,
    11. Qin ED,
    12. Qin CF
    . 2013. Novel cis-acting element within the capsid-coding region enhances flavivirus viral-RNA replication by regulating genome cyclization. J Virol 87:6804–6818. doi:10.1128/JVI.00243-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Hahn CS,
    2. Hahn YS,
    3. Rice CM,
    4. Lee E,
    5. Dalgarno L,
    6. Strauss EG,
    7. Strauss JH
    . 1987. Conserved elements in the 3' untranslated region of flavivirus RNAs and potential cyclization sequences. J Mol Biol 198:33–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    1. Friebe P,
    2. Shi PY,
    3. Harris E
    . 2011. The 5' and 3' downstream AUG region elements are required for mosquito-borne flavivirus RNA replication. J Virol 85:1900–1905. doi:10.1128/JVI.02037-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Song BH,
    2. Yun SI,
    3. Choi YJ,
    4. Kim JM,
    5. Lee CH,
    6. Lee YM
    . 2008. A complex RNA motif defined by three discontinuous 5-nucleotide-long strands is essential for flavivirus RNA replication. RNA 14:1791–1813. doi:10.1261/rna.993608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Alvarez DE,
    2. Filomatori CV,
    3. Gamarnik AV
    . 2008. Functional analysis of dengue virus cyclization sequences located at the 5' and 3'UTRs. Virology 375:223–235. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2008.01.014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Gomila RC,
    2. Martin GW,
    3. Gehrke L
    . 2011. NF90 binds the dengue virus RNA 3' terminus and is a positive regulator of dengue virus replication. PLoS One 6:e16687. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016687.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Ivanyi-Nagy R,
    2. Lavergne JP,
    3. Gabus C,
    4. Ficheux D,
    5. Darlix JL
    . 2008. RNA chaperoning and intrinsic disorder in the core proteins of Flaviviridae. Nucleic Acids Res 36:712–725. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm1051.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    1. Ward AM,
    2. Bidet K,
    3. Yinglin A,
    4. Ler SG,
    5. Hogue K,
    6. Blackstock W,
    7. Gunaratne J,
    8. Garcia-Blanco MA
    . 2011. Quantitative mass spectrometry of DENV-2 RNA-interacting proteins reveals that the DEAD-box RNA helicase DDX6 binds the DB1 and DB2 3' UTR structures. RNA Biol 8:1173–1186. doi:10.4161/rna.8.6.17836.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    1. Friedrich S,
    2. Schmidt T,
    3. Geissler R,
    4. Lilie H,
    5. Chabierski S,
    6. Ulbert S,
    7. Liebert UG,
    8. Golbik RP,
    9. Behrens SE
    . 2014. AUF1 p45 promotes West Nile virus replication by an RNA chaperone activity that supports cyclization of the viral genome. J Virol 88:11586–11599. doi:10.1128/JVI.01283-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. Friedrich S,
    2. Engelmann S,
    3. Schmidt T,
    4. Szczepankiewicz G,
    5. Bergs S,
    6. Liebert UG,
    7. Kummerer BM,
    8. Golbik RP,
    9. Behrens SE
    . 2018. The host factor AUF1 p45 supports flavivirus propagation by triggering the RNA switch required for viral genome cyclization. J Virol 92:e01647-17. doi:10.1128/JVI.01647-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Bidet K,
    2. Dadlani D,
    3. Garcia-Blanco MA
    . 2014. G3BP1, G3BP2 and CAPRIN1 are required for translation of interferon stimulated mRNAs and are targeted by a dengue virus non-coding RNA. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004242. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Brackney DE,
    2. Beane JE,
    3. Ebel GD
    . 2009. RNAi targeting of West Nile virus in mosquito midguts promotes virus diversification. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000502. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.↵
    1. Durbin AP,
    2. Karron RA,
    3. Sun W,
    4. Vaughn DW,
    5. Reynolds MJ,
    6. Perreault JR,
    7. Thumar B,
    8. Men R,
    9. Lai CJ,
    10. Elkins WR,
    11. Chanock RM,
    12. Murphy BR,
    13. Whitehead SS
    . 2001. Attenuation and immunogenicity in humans of a live dengue virus type-4 vaccine candidate with a 30 nucleotide deletion in its 3'-untranslated region. Am J Trop Med Hyg 65:405–413.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  66. 66.↵
    1. Shan C,
    2. Muruato AE,
    3. Nunes BTD,
    4. Luo H,
    5. Xie X,
    6. Medeiros DBA,
    7. Wakamiya M,
    8. Tesh RB,
    9. Barrett AD,
    10. Wang T,
    11. Weaver SC,
    12. Vasconcelos PFC,
    13. Rossi SL,
    14. Shi PY
    . 2017. A live-attenuated Zika virus vaccine candidate induces sterilizing immunity in mouse models. Nat Med 23:763–767. doi:10.1038/nm.4322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    1. Proutski V,
    2. Gritsun TS,
    3. Gould EA,
    4. Holmes EC
    . 1999. Biological consequences of deletions within the 3'-untranslated region of flaviviruses may be due to rearrangements of RNA secondary structure. Virus Res 64:107–123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Chen R,
    2. Wang E,
    3. Tsetsarkin KA,
    4. Weaver SC
    . 2013. Chikungunya virus 3' untranslated region: adaptation to mosquitoes and a population bottleneck as major evolutionary forces. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003591. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003591.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    1. Casari G,
    2. Sander C,
    3. Valencia A
    . 1995. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 2:171–178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. 70.↵
    1. Mandl CW,
    2. Heinz FX,
    3. Puchhammer-Stöckl E,
    4. Kunz C
    . 1991. Sequencing the termini of capped viral RNA by 5'-3' ligation and PCR. Biotechniques 10:484, 486.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  71. 71.↵
    1. Byk LA,
    2. Iglesias NG,
    3. De Maio FA,
    4. Gebhard LG,
    5. Rossi M,
    6. Gamarnik AV
    . 2016. Dengue virus genome uncoating requires ubiquitination. mBio 7:e00804-16. doi:10.1128/mBio.00804-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. 72.↵
    1. Fricke M,
    2. Marz M
    . 2016. Prediction of conserved long-range RNA-RNA interactions in full viral genomes. Bioinformatics 32:2928–2935. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw323.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
RNA Structure Duplication in the Dengue Virus 3′ UTR: Redundancy or Host Specificity?
Luana de Borba, Sergio M. Villordo, Franco L. Marsico, Juan M. Carballeda, Claudia V. Filomatori, Leopoldo G. Gebhard, Horacio M. Pallarés, Sebastian Lequime, Louis Lambrechts, Irma Sánchez Vargas, Carol D. Blair, Andrea V. Gamarnik
mBio Jan 2019, 10 (1) e02506-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02506-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this mBio article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
RNA Structure Duplication in the Dengue Virus 3′ UTR: Redundancy or Host Specificity?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from mBio
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in mBio.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
RNA Structure Duplication in the Dengue Virus 3′ UTR: Redundancy or Host Specificity?
Luana de Borba, Sergio M. Villordo, Franco L. Marsico, Juan M. Carballeda, Claudia V. Filomatori, Leopoldo G. Gebhard, Horacio M. Pallarés, Sebastian Lequime, Louis Lambrechts, Irma Sánchez Vargas, Carol D. Blair, Andrea V. Gamarnik
mBio Jan 2019, 10 (1) e02506-18; DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02506-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

RNA virus
RNA virus evolution
RNA-RNA interactions
dengue virus
flavivirus
host adaptation
viral RNA structures

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About mBio
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • AAM Fellows
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Warranty
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #mBio

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Online ISSN: 2150-7511